HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Final Action Letter Approved With Conditions 111020October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 FILE NO.: Z-9536
NAME: Woodlands Valley PRD
LOCATION: South side of Cooper Orbit Road, at Kanis Road
DEVELOPER:
Woodlands Hill of Little Rock, LLC
15100 Pride Valley Road
Little Rock, AR 72223
OWNER/AUTHORIZED AGENT:
Brian Dale
White-Dater & Associates, Inc.
24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
SURVEYOR/ENGINEER:
AREA: 17.35 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 81 FT. NEW STREET: 2,590 LF
WARD: N/A PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 CENSUS TRACT: 42.07
CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-Family District
VARIANCE/WAIVERS:
1. A variance for advanced grading of the entire property with the construction of the
infrastructure.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST/APPLICANT’S STATEMENT:
The applicant proposes to rezone 17.35 acres from R-2, Single-Family District, to
PRD, Planned Residential Development. The plan calls for the development of
attached residential townhomes and garden patio homes (detached) on eighty-one
(81) lots. The subdivision will be constructed in four (4) phases.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
2
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The property is located on the west side of Woodlands Trail, south of Kanis Road.
The site is undeveloped and heavily wooded. North of the property is mixed
development of commercial and residential uses. The properties to the east and
west are primarily undeveloped. Woodlands Edge Subdivision is located to the
south of the subject property.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site; and Parkway Place,
Citizens of West Pulaski County, Woodlands Edge and Spring Valley Manor
Neighborhood Associations were notified of public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
1. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street
Plan. Construct street improvement to these streets including 5-foot sidewalks
with planned development.
2. At time of abandonment of Cooper Orbit Road, a concrete driveway ramp
should be constructed connecting old Cooper Orbit Road into the new realigned
section to provide a secondary emergency fire access route to the subdivision.
3. A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required
prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential
subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved
prior to the start of construction. An advance grading variance is being
requested to advance grade future phases with construction of the first phase
and to clear and grade the lots with construction of the streets.
E. UTILITIES/FIRE DEPARTMENT/PARKS/COUNTY PLANNING:
Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: No comments received.
Entergy: No comments received.
CenterPoint Energy: No comments received.
AT & T: No comments received.
Central Arkansas Water: No comments received.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
3
Fire Department:
Maintain Access:
Fire Hydrants.
Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D
of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road
width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access
road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders.
Grade
Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire
Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads
shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. If
the grade exceeds 10 percent, approval will be denied and the applicant must
submit request to be reviewed by Fire Chief for Approval.
Loading
Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012
Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading.
Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be
accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus
access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable
of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds.
Dead Ends.
Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix
D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead
Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be
provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4.
Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads.
Gates
Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012
Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access
road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with
all of the following criteria:
1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet.
2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type.
3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one
person.
4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and
replaces or repaired when defective.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
4
5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire
department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices
shall be approved by the fire code official.
6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock
unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or
when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location.
7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code
official
8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with
UL 325.
9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and
installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200.
One- or Two-Family Residential Developments.
As per Appendix D, Section D107.1 of the Arkansas Fire Prevention Code
Vol. 1, One- or Two-Family dwelling residential developments. Developments
of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30
shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads,
and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3.
Exceptions:
1. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or
private fire apparatus access road and al dwelling units are equipped
throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the
Arkansas Fire Code, access from two directions shall not be required.
2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall
not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect with
future development, as determined by the fire code official.
Fire Hydrants
Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire
Prevention Code. Section C101 – C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas
Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshal’s Office
(Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number
and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1.
Parks and Recreation: No comments received.
County Planning: No Comments.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
5
F. BUILDING CODES/LANDSCAPE:
Building Code: No comments.
Landscape: No comments.
G. TRANSPORTATION/PLANNING:
Rock Region Metro: No comments.
Planning Division: The request is in the Ellis Mountain Planning District. The Land
Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) and Mixed Office Commercial
(MOC) for the requested area. The Residential Low-Density category provides for
single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 dwelling units per acre. Such
residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family
homes, but may also include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided
that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. Mixed Office Commercial
provides for a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur. Acceptable uses are
office or mixed office and commercial. The application is to change an area from
R-2 (Single Family District) to PRD (Planned Residential Development) District to
allow the future development on the site.
Surrounding the application area, the Land Use Plan shows Residential Low
Density (RL) to the west and south. Suburban Office (SO) is shown to the north
and Mixed Office Commercial (MOC) is shown to the east of the application area.
The Residential Low-Density category provides for single family homes at
densities not to exceed 6 dwelling units per acre. Such residential development is
typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may also include
patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less
than 6 units per acre. The Suburban Office category shall provide for low intensity
development of office or office parks in close proximity to lower density residential
areas to assure compatibility. A Planned Zoning District is required. Mixed Office
Commercial provides for a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur.
Acceptable uses are office or mixed office and commercial.
Master Street Plan: To the north is Cooper Orbit Road is a Local Street on the
Master Street Plan. The primary function of Local Streets is to provide access to
adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use
or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as “Commercial Streets”.
This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street
improvements for entrances and exits to the site.
Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
6
ANALYSIS:
The applicant proposes to rezone the 17.35 acre property located along the south
side of Cooper Orbit Road at Kanis Road from “R-2” Single Family District to “PRD”
Planned Residential District. The applicant proposes to subdivide the 17.35 acres
into 81 lots for attached and detached single family residential development. Lots
1 through 48, Block 3 will be developed for garden patio homes. Lots 1 through
33, Block 4 will be developed for attached single family townhomes. The
subdivision will contain a 2,590 linear foot loop street, Woodlands Valley Circle,
which will serve all of the lots. The townhouse lots within Block 4 will have a shared
alley access along their rear property lines. Woodlands Valley Circle will extend
from Woodlands Hills Blvd., a new street extending from the east side of
Woodlands Trail. A secondary emergency access will be located between Lots 15
and 16, Block 3 along the south portion of the subdivision. Another secondary
emergency access will be located between Lots 22 and 23, Block 3 at the
northwest corner of the plat.
Cooper Orbit Road is located along the north boundary of the subdivision, and is
shown to be located within Tract E. Stormwater detention will also be located
within Tract E, at the southeast corner of the subdivision. A mail kiosk will be
located within Tract G, at the west end of Woodlands Valley Circle.
The applicant proposes to final plat the subdivision in four (4) phases as follows:
Phase 1: Lots 1 – 7 and Lots 46 – 48, Block 3 and Lots 19 – 28; Block 4
Phase 2: Lots 8 – 16, Block 3 and Lots 29 -33, Block 4
Phase 3: Lots 36 – 45, Block 3 and Lots 12 – 18, Block 4
Phase 4: Lots 17 – 35, Block 3 and Lots 1 – 11, Block 4
The applicant notes that the residential structures on all lots will conform with the
typical maximum R-2 building height of 35 feet. Sections 36-254 (d) (1) – (3) of
the City’s Zoning Ordinance typically requires a minimum front building setback of
25 feet, a minimum rear setback of 25 feet and minimum side setbacks of eight (8)
feet or 10 percent of the lot width. The applicant is proposing minimum building
setbacks as follows:
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
7
BLOCK 3 BLOCK 4
Front Setback – 20’ Front Setback – 15’
Rear Setback – 15’ Rear Setback – 20’
Side Setback – 5’ Side Setback – 0’
Variances from Section 36-254 are not required due to the fact that this is a PRD
rezoning request and not a standard R-2 zoned plat.
The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Alteration Regulations to
advance grade the entire subdivision with the issuance of the grading permit for
construction of the streets, drainage infrastructure, and utilities in Phase 1 of
Woodlands Hills subdivision located to the south. Fill material will be hauled from
Woodlands Hills subdivision to Woodlands Valley subdivision to balance the
earthwork with no hauling over public streets. The applicant proposes, if Cooper
Orbit Road is still open to the public and not relocated or abandoned at time of
issuance of a grading permit for Woodlands Hills Subdivision Phase 1, the
applicant will work with the Public Works staff on providing a combination of buffers
and berms to screen the advanced graded area from Cooper Orbit Road. Staff
recommends approval of the advance grading variance conditioned on, if Cooper
Orbit Road is open to public use, the applicant will provide a combination of an
undisturbed buffer and earthen berm along the south side of Cooper Orbit Road.
Also, temporary stormwater detention is required to be provided until the
permanent detention pond is installed. All advance graded disturbed areas along
with berms should be stabilized prior to the approval of the final plat for Woodlands
Hills Subdivision Phase 1.
The proposed plat shows a monument-type subdivision sign at the entrance to the
subdivision. The applicant notes that the sign will comply with Section 36-551 of
the code, with a maximum height of six (6) feet and a maximum area of 32 square
feet.
The applicant also proposes to abandon the portion of Cooper Orbit Road adjacent
to this overall property as part of the development plan. The applicant proposes
for Cooper Orbit Road to re-align with Panther Branch Drive to the northwest for a
new intersection with Kanis Road. The City of Little Rock and Pulaski County are
in a joint effort to re-align Cooper Orbit Road with Panther Branch Drive. The
abandonment request for the portion of Cooper Orbit Road adjacent to this
proposed subdivision will not be submitted to the City Board of Directors for
approval until the re-alignment project is complete.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
8
The applicant provided responses and additional information to all issues raised
during staff’s review of the application. To staff’s knowledge there are no
outstanding issues.
Staff is supportive of the requested PRD zoning in order to develop an 81 lot single
family subdivision on 17.35 acres. Staff views the request as reasonable. The
development will include 48 patio home lots and 33 attached single family
townhouses. The majority of the property is designated as “RL” Residential Low
Density on the City’s Future Land Use Plan. This designation allows single family
development of up to six (6) units per acre. The PRD development as proposed
will have approximately 4.67 residential units per acre, well within the “RL”
designation. Staff believes this single family development will have no adverse
impact on the general area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested PRD zoning, including advance
grading variance and right-of-way abandonment, subject to compliance with the
comments and conditions outlined in paragraphs D and E, and the Staff Analysis,
in the agenda staff report, along with the following conditions:
1. Full width right-of-way is to be dedicated for the extension of Panther Branch
Drive across the Hastings property;
2. The Panther Branch Drive extension is constructed with a total width of 24 ft.
of pavement with no curb and gutter to the existing Cooper Orbit Road;
3. Following the completion of Panther Branch Drive, Cooper Orbit Road right-of-
way south of McKenzie Apartments to Kanis Road is abandoned and Panther
Branch Drive is the remaining access from Cooper Orbit Road to Kanis Road;
4. With completion of the Panther Branch Drive extension to Cooper Orbit Road,
the boundary street improvements to both the north and south sides of Cooper
Orbit Road are waived as required by the Boundary Street Ordinance.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 29, 2020)
Items 10. (Z-9536), 11. (S-1879), 13. (Z-5096-E) and 14. (S-1881) were reviewed and
discussed simultaneously.
The applicants were present for all items. There were several persons present in
opposition. Staff presented the items with a recommendation of approval of each item.
Staff noted that the applicants had agreed to install a traffic signal at Woodlands Trail and
Kanis Road and to leave a 50-foot wide buffer along the east side of the proposed
commercial Lot 6, with the traffic signal being installed at the applicants’ expense. Staff
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
9
noted that the traffic signal should be installed when measured volumes are sufficient to
meet the warrants.
Don Eilbott (Attorney) was present, representing the application. Mr. Eilbott offered to
defer to the opposition after an introduction of the development team for the application:
Graham Smith (Developer), Jesse Munn (Rocket Properties), Scott Hurley (Community
Developer), Ernie Peters (Professional Engineer), Tim Daters (President, White-Daters &
Associates), and Brian Dale (VP, White-Daters & Associates).
Wallace Smith, Resident of Woodlands Edge Community and Civil Engineer, addressed
the Commission in opposition of application. Mr. Smith presented a Power Point
Presentation to address the Woodlands North Slope Master Plan (i.e., Agenda Items 10-
14). In his presentation, Mr. Smith expressed concerns regarding the increased traffic at
the Kanis Road and Woodlands Trail intersection; the proposed 50-foot Advanced
Grading Buffers along Kanis Road; and the adherence to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act. He explained that the opposition to the Traffic Analysis conducted by Peters and
Associates “does not conclude this development is a good idea.”
Also, Mr. Smith offered the following alternatives to address the opposing points:
1. Three (3) lanes on Kanis Road from Taylor Park Boulevard to Panther Branch Drive.
2. A traffic light at the Kanis Road and Woodlands Trail intersection.
3. Spread the traffic more evenly onto Kanis Road using Panther Branch Drive for the
primary connection for Woodlands Hills and Woodlands Valley.
4. Section 404 Permitting with wetlands delineations and hydrology and hydraulic
modeling per USACE Little Rock along with Environmental Assessment (EA) of
property.
Mr. Smith concluded by stating that without these four (4) items being implemented, the
Commission should vote no to Items Numbers 10-14.
Ross Phillips, Spring Valley POA, addressed the Commission in opposition of the
application. He confirmed his support of Wallace Smith’s presentation. Mr. Phillips briefly
explained concerns regarding access and abandonment of Cooper Orbit Road; the
timeframe for the completion of Panther Branch Road; the advanced grading of Woodland
Hills and Woodland Valley; and the designation of a responsible party for the maintenance
of Cooper Orbit Road after annexation.
Raymond Abramson, President of the Woods Homeowners Association, addressed the
Commission in opposition of the application. He stated the association opposes the
proposals based on the traffic and drainage concerns. Mr. Abramson also expressed
support of the remaining issues presented by Wallace Smith.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
10
Stephanie Duty, Resident of Woodlands Edge Community, addressed the Commission
in opposition of the application. She expressed support of the presentation by Wallace
Smith. Ms. Duty briefly explained that she was concerned with the entrance and exit
points available for the current and future residents; and the lack of communication about
the proposals to the residents.
Amanda Smith, Resident of Woodlands Edge Community, addressed the Commission in
opposition of the application. She expressed support of the presentation by Wallace
Smith. Ms. Smith explained her concerns for the traffic congestion at Woodlands Edge
and Kanis Road; and the safety concerns for the teen drivers in the community.
Dan Veach, Resident of Woodlands Edge Community, addressed the Commission in
opposition of the application. Mr. Veach requested that the Commission table the request
and/or allow the residents to communicate where they stand on the issues. If not, the
community supports Wallace Smith’s presentation.
Bobbi Lane, Resident of the Woodlands Edge Community, addressed the Commission in
opposition of the application. Ms. Lane challenged the accuracy of the applicants’ Traffic
Study. She stated that new developments along Kanis Road will add to the existing traffic
issues. Ms. Lane added concerns regarding the potential flooding of Panther Branch
Creek as a result of the new developments.
Dennis Young, Resident of Taylor Park Addition, addressed the Commission in opposition
of the application. He briefly explained his opposing points are related to the total
confusion, potential land swaps, and commercial zoning requests.
Ruth Bell, League of Women Voters, addressed the Commission in opposition of the
application. Mrs. Bell stated that the adverse traffic implications due to multiple
developments, the feasibility of street improvements to traffic demands, and the proposed
setbacks for Agenda Item 11 were her primary concerns.
Patty Snipes, Resident of Taylor Park, addressed the Commission in opposition of the
application. Ms. Snipes expressed her concerns regarding the heavy traffic on the two
(2) lanes of Kanis Road and the effect of the commercial zoning on the existing traffic
issues.
Mr. Eilbott addressed the Commission to introduce the development team. He also noted
that the proposed density for Woodlands Valley and Woodland Hills is 20% and 50% less
than the density permitted in the current zoning classification.
Graham Smith stated that development group aimed to create a product with the best
benefits. The plans were developed from an inclusive perspective among a group of
advisors and professionals using open concepts which would create a product for the
greater community of Little Rock.
October 29, 2020
ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9536
11
Scott Hurley offered that the team develops based on the demand and not based solely
on revenue. Acknowledging the challenges along Kanis Road, he stated the team is
addressing the traffic issues.
Jesse Munn expressed that the development represents the final piece of an award-
winning neighbor. To address the some of the concerns for the residents and his
neighbors, the team worked together to provide a 50-foot evergreen, dense buffer against
Taylor Park and green spaces with some undisturbed next to the homes on the South.
He also stated that early in the development process he met with neighborhood
associations and hosted a community meeting with the engineering team to answer any
questions for the community.
Ernie Peters briefly explained the general nature of the traffic study focused on five (5)
scenarios with varying traffic conditions. Recognizing variances in the traffic volume due
to the COVID-19 environment, Mr. Peters noted the proposed estimates are reasonable.
In addition, the interim improvements to widen Kanis Road to three (3) lanes and to install
the traffic signal have been offered in the proposal. The associated benefits are the right-
of-way assignment and the increased safety. Mr. Peters also noted that the traffic signal
will not be implemented until the warrant criteria is outlined by the City.
Tim Daters and Brian Dale emphasized the rationale for the need of the traffic signal and
the awareness of the 404 Permitting Requirements. Mr. Daters acknowledged that the
firm remains in compliance on every project with the assistance of consultants familiar
with the regulatory requirements. Mr. Dale confirmed that Environmental Engineers have
been engaged for the Hastings’ Tract. He also briefly explained the collaborative efforts
between the County, City, and Develop Team to get Panther Branch Drive connected
prior to the abandonment of Cooper Orbit Road.
Mr. Eilbott made three (3) observations regarding Wallace Smith’s presentation:
1. There is no alternative exit to Panther Branch Drive because the applicants do not
own the property which will allow access.
2. The Development Team confirms adherence to the U.S. Corps of Engineers in
keeping with all requirements.
3. The proposed developments will generate between $900K and $1.1M in annual real
estate taxes for the benefit of Pulaski County and the Pulaski County Schools.
A motion was made to approve Item 10 (Z-9536) as recommended by staff. The motion
was seconded. The vote was 9 ayes, 2 noes and 0 absent. The application was
approved.