Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutboa_05 20 2021LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA PROCEDURE MAY 20, 2021 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum II. Approval of the Minutes of the March 18, 2021 meeting of the Board of Adjustment Ill. Presentation of Consent Agenda IV. Presentation of Hearing Items LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY OF MINUTES MAY 20, 2021 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being five (5) in number. II. Approval of the Minutes of the March 18, 2021 meeting of the Board of Adjustment. The Minutes of the March 18, 2021 meeting were approved. Members Present: Frank Allison -Chairman Richard Bertram-Vice Chair Justin Grinder Joe Justus Katherine Lashley Members Absent: None City Attorney Present: Shawn Overton LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ABBREVIATED AGENDA MAY 20, 2021 4:00 P.M. I. OLD BUSINESS: No Old Business II. NEW BUSINESS: 1.Z-6631-A 4700 Crestwood Drive 2.Z-9500-A 3708 Garrison Road 3.Z-9579 4907 Crestwood Drive 4.Z-9580 1724 S. Pine Street 5.Z-9581 2217 West Road 6.Z-9582 3608 Doral Drive 7.Z-9583 Tract 1: 701 Broadway Street and Tract 2: 403 W. 7th Street MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 1 Z-6631-A File No.: Z-6631-A Owners: Patrick and Mary O'Brien Applicant: Yeary Lindsey Architects Address: 4700 Crestwood Drive Legal Description: Lot 31 R, Cliffwood Addition Zoned: R-2 (Single -Family District) Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance(s) Requested: Request from the building line provisions of Sec. 31-12 to allow a building addition which crosses a platted side yard building line. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated February 15, 2021. STAFF REPORT C Planning and Development Civil Engineering: No Comment. Landscape and Buffers: In October 2020 the City adopted the "Heights Landscape Design Overlay District," requiring installation of one tree per 40 linear feet of street frontage within the Heights District Boundary, applicable to [among other types] residential construction in excess of 600 square feet. Building Codes: The required fire separation distance (building to property line) prescribed by the building code terminates at five (5) feet. Buildings are allowed to be closer than five (5) feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite one (1) hour fire resistance rating. When buildings are five (5) feet or more from 1 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 1 Z-6631-A the property line, the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself, only the projections such as eaves or overhangs. Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three (3) feet from the property line and are prohibited when the exterior wall is less than three (3) feet from the line. There is no restriction on openings when the exterior wall is more than three (3) feet from the property line. Contact City of Little Rock Building Codes at (501)371-4832 for additional details. D.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located in the Heights Overlay District at 4700 Crestwood Drive is occupied by a two-story, brick and frame single-family residence. The parcel occupies the northwest corner of Crestwood Drive and Palm Street with the home facing Crestwood. A detached carport and off-street parking are accessed on the east side of the property from Palm Street. The applicant is proposing a first-floor master bedroom suite addition to the east side of the existing home. A 20-foot platted building line parallel with the east property line is indicated on the survey. The approximate 16' x 40' first-floor addition would project past this building line roughly 10 feet at its widest point leaving no less than 10 feet for a remaining side yard setback. This setback would increase as the addition runs southward leaving approximately 13 feet from the property line at the southeast corner of the addition. Section 31-12(b) of the City's Subdivision Ordinance states, "In those instances where a recorded subdivision plat has established building setback lines in accordance with this chapter variances of those lines shall only be granted by the Board of Adjustment." The platted front building setback for the subject property is 20 feet, and the requested setback is 10 feet. Staff views the request as reasonable and is supportive of the platted side yard setback line variance. Typically, side yard setbacks in R-2 zoning districts are not less than ten (10) percent of the average width of the lot, not to exceed eight (8) feet. The average width of the subject property is approximately 80 feet requiring a maximum 8-foot side yard setback. The proposed house addition will not encroach into the R-2 side yard setback requirements. In staffs opinion, the proposed addition poses no negative effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the general public, and will not detract from the value or aesthetic of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. If the Board approves the requested side yard setback line variance, the applicant must then produce a one-lot replat reflecting the approved change. As such, the applicant must also review filing procedures with the County Clerk's office to 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 1 Z-6631-A determine if the replat will require a revised Bill of Assurance and respond as necessary and appropriate, as part of said replat. E.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested platted front setback line variance, subject to the following conditions: 1.Completion of a replat reflecting the above-described building line change. 2.Install any required trees in accordance with the Heights Landscape Design Overlay District. Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent. 3 Yeary Lindsey Architects February 15, 2021 Mr. Tim Herndon Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Pat and Mary O'Brien Variance Request 4700 Crestwood Drive Little Rock, AR 72207 Dear Tim, Please find attached our submittal to the Little Rock Board of Adjustments requesting a variance to allow the crossing of a platted building line at 4700 Crestwood Drive. Our clients plan to add a first floor master bedroom suite to the east side of their existing home. There is an existing 20' platted building line along the east side of the property. We are proposing an addition that would project past the building line approximately 10' at the widest point leaving no less that 10' for a remaining side yard setback. This setback would increase as the addition runs southward leaving approximately 13' from the property line on the southeast corner. We feel this is a reasonable request as these setbacks are still beyond the required typical 8' side yard setback for a lot of this size. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me. We appreciate your consideration of our request. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellen Yeary, AIA 3416 Old Cantrell Road Llttle Rock, Arkansas 72202 501-372-5940 Fax: 501-663-0043 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 2 Z-9500-A File No.: Z-9500-A Owner: Gary S. & Andrea R. Goodwin Applicant: Andrew V. Francis, PA; Barber Law Firm, PLLC Address: 3708 Garrison Road Legal Description: On file Zoned: R-2 (Single-Family District) Variance(s) Requested: An appeal of the City's denial of a Business License for Home Occupation Accessory Use. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in attached letter dated March 16, 2021. STAFF REPORT A.Planning and Development Civil Engineering: No Comments. B.Landscape and Buffers: No Comments. C.Building Codes: No Comments. D.Staff Analysis: Rezoning Application and Appeal 3708 Garrison Road, aka Goodwin Manor, lies within the City of Little Rock extra­ territorial jurisdiction (ET J), outside the City limit, and is zoned R-2 Single-Family district. The property has been the residence of the Goodwin · family for approximately 25 years. The Goodwins advertise and rent/lease the property (indoor and outdoor portions of the residence and grounds) for weddings, charitable functions, and similar events. Responding to a complaint, in October 2019 the City issued a Zoning Violation Notice, stating operation of an event center is not allowed in the R-2 zoning district. The owners subsequently communicated extensively with City staff in hopes of resolving the violation. While the owners objected to a "commercial" designation, staff then knew, and presently knows of no alternative to a commercial designation, because Goodwin Manor operations involve the following: -Advertising in a variety of publications and host sites, including own website. Advertised rental of the venue. -Stock in trade including advertised round tables, rectangle tables, chairs and linens. (On-site or off-site source, type and quantity of equipment is presently unknown.) 1 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 2(CON'T.) Z-9500-A - Musicians, bands and/or DJs for ceremonies, receptions, and parties. - Food service personnel including caterers, servers and bussers. - Other vendors including photographers, florists, bridal consultants, etc. - Associated assembly, breakdown, equipment and facility maintenance personnel. - Equipment haulers, trash disposal, etc. - Security provided on -site. - Associated vehicles and parking. In April 2020 the applicant filed an application to Little Rock Planning Commission for rezoning of the property from R-2 to Planned Commercial Development (PCD). Approval of PCD zoning would allow "events" or "events center" as an accessory use at the Goodwin residence. However, the request was denied by the Planning Commission by a vote of 4 ayes, 5 nays and 2 absent. The applicant then filed an appeal of the Planning Commission denial of rezoning to the Little Rock Board of Directors. In December 2020, the Board denied said appeal by a vote of 4 ayes, 3 nays, 2 absent and 1 present (6 "aye" votes are required for approval.) Business License Application Denial and Appeal — Following denial of rezoning by the Planning Commission and Board of Directors, in March 2021 the applicant applied for a business license as a "Home Occupation Accessory Use." Per Section 36-253(b)(6)(d), Planning and Development Department is the authorizing agency for granting or denying and accessory use permit, and the permit application was denied by Planning and Development Department on the following grounds (additional staff comments in italics.) Sec. 36-253(b)(6)a. Home occupations shall be permitted that will not: 2. Generate traffic, parking, sewage or water use in excess of what is normal in the residential neighborhood. Event activity at 3708 Garrison Road has proven to generate excessive traffic in the neighborhood, and sewage and water usage will exceed normal residential neighborhood use during events. The property will accommodate 200 guests, and site plans submitted by the applicant delineate parking for approximately 80 vehicles. 3. Create a hazard to persons or property, result in electric interference or become a nuisance. Numerous complaints indicate events and/or directly associated activities are perceived as a nuisance. 7. Limited to five hundred (500) square feet in area, but in no case more than forty-nine (49) percent of the floor area in a dwelling. Although floor area square footage used for events has not been plainly disclosed by the applicant, event activities are certain to occupy more than the 500 square feet maximum allowable by Code. 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 2(CON'T.) Z-9500-A For example, the owners' February 3, 2020 letter to staff states, ''Five or fewer rooms of our home are utilized ... " In order for the allowable 500 square-foot area to be adhered to, these five rooms would have to average 1 0' x 1 0' each -which, separately or in total, would not accommodate 200 guests and/or 80+ automobiles expressed by the owners. In addition, space for office/administration of the operation, dressing rooms for bride, groom, wedding party and family, equipment and material storage, food preparation, etc. is likely to occupy more than the 500 square feet allowed by Code (500 s.f = less than a 23' x 23' area.) Also, the Goodwins' September 4, 2020 letter to neighbors states, "No additional permanent structures are allowed other than the single [40' x 80'] proposed outbuilding shown on the site plan ... " Said 3,200 s.f outbuilding itself would be greater than eight times the square footage allowed by Code for a Home Occupation Accessory Use. Finally, the March 2, 2021 Application for Business License submitted by the owner states, ''Floor Area Used: Typically, no more than 3 rooms of the home, totaling less than 25% of the floor area of the home." ... 25% of the Goodwin Manor floor area is roughly 3,500 square feet of the 14, 102 total square-foot structure, and is therefore not support.able as a Home Occupation Accessory Use. Note: the above criteria in Sec. 36-253(b )(6)a. must be met in order for City staff to grant a business license. In a March 16, 2021 cover letter accompanying this [subject] appeal of the Planning and Development Department denial of the Home Occupation Accessory Use business license, the applicant states: "The Goodwins believe that due to the factors listed above, including but not limited to the remote location of their property, the enormous size of the property, the rural nature of the Ferndale neighborhood, the fact that the City has stated the property is in the ET J, and other factors support granting the Goodwins' Applications for a Business License and Home Occupation Accessory Use." Staff hereby responds as follows: In accordance with the City Code, "remoteness" is not a factor for consideration in the context of Sec. 36-253, and while the subject site is relatively far from other more urbanized neighborhoods, the site is not remote relative to adjacent and nearby affected neighbors. The "rural nature" of the neighborhood is not a factor in the context of Sec. 36-253. The "enormous size" of the property is not a factor for consideration within the context of Sec. 36-253, although staff notes the subject development and parking area lies within 100 feet of the property boundary, near to adjacent properties to the east. 3 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 2(CON'T.) Z-9500-A As stated in the applicant's letter, the property lies within the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ET J ,) over which the City of Little exercises land use and zoning regulation authority, pursuant to Ordinance No. 15,814 (establishing zoning districts within three miles of the corporate limits of Little Rock) and to Resolution No. 8,170. Additional Notes (staff comments in italics) - Commercial Use The April 2, 2020 PZD application submitted by the owners states, "Desired Use of Property: Single Family Residence and part time wedding/event rental." As evidenced by the content of this report and based upon ample information and applications submitted by the owners, Goodwin Manor operates, and proposes to operate, as a commercial use and business. Frequency of Events The Goodwins' February 3, 2020 cover letter states, " ... we allow a limited number of weddings to be hosted at our home, usually no more than 15-20 times a year." The Goodwins' March 2, 2021 Application for Business License states, "Number of events: Not to exceed twenty-four (24) events per year, so events will occur a maximum of 24 days out of a 365 day year." Relative Location The Goodwins' February 3, 2020 cover letter states, "The tract which Goodwin Manor sits on, is in the middle of the 80 total acres, which is owned by our family." Per the attached site plan, it is apparent the parking lot is generally adjacent to (within 100 feet of) off-site properties to the east. Access Access to Goodwin manor is via an existing 1,600-foot drive from Garrison Road to the north, and via a 1, 100-foot drive to the south. These drives are not constructed to public street standards and are suited to low­ volume private residential use, shared by area residents. While the Goodwins have stated they will widen, pave and illuminate these roadways "if their application is approved," doing so would impact area residents by creating a formal thoroughfare for approaching and departing Goodwin Manor attendees. Prospective off-site street lighting (for what is essentially a private drive) would be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. The Board of Adjustment is asked to determine if Staff's denial of a Business License application for Home Occupation Accessory Use is appropriate pursuant to Section 36-253(b)(6)a of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances. 4 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 2(CON'T.) Z-9500-A Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There was a motion to defer the item at the applicant's request. The motion was seconded. There was no further discussion. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. 5 ANDREW V. FRANCIS, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 2311 BISCAYNE DRIVE, SUITE 205 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 TELEPHONE (501) 954-7390 ANDREW V. FRANCIS E-MAIL ADDRESS: A VFPA@SBCGLOBAL.NET March 16, 2021 Mr. Monte Moore Development Administrator Planning and Development Department City of Little Rock 723 W. Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Via Hand Delivery RE: Goodwin Manor, 3708 Garrison Road, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas 72223 Appeal from Staff Decision; and Request for Variance from Home Occupation Provisions of R-1 Zoning Ordinance, Section 36-253(b)(6) Dear Mr. Moore: Mark Stodola of the Barber Law Firm, PLLC, and I represent Gary and Andrea Goodwin in the above-referenced matters. Enclosed please find the following documents. I.Application for Business License and Home Occupation Accessory Use Application for Goodwin Manor, both dated March 2, 2021 ; 2.Email from City of Little Rock dated March 12, 2021, denying Home Occupation Accessory Use Application for Goodwin Manor dated 02/02/2021; 3.Application for Zoning Variance (hardship variance) for Goodwin Manor; 4.Application for Zoning Variance (appeal of staff decision) for Goodwin Manor; 5.Twelve (l 2) copies (six copies for each variance application) of a boundary survey of the Goodwin property at 3 708 Garrison Road and access easement to Garrison Road dated January 27, 2020, by Johnston Surveying, Inc.; 6.Twelve (12) copies (six copies for each variance application) of a site plan of Goodwin home dated January 27, 2020, by Johnston Surveying, Inc.; 7.My firm check in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) as the filing fee for the hardship variance application; and 8.My firm check in the amount of Seventy-Five Dollars ($75) as the filing fee for the appeal of staff decision. Below is a discussion of these applications and the facts supporting the Goodwins applications. Page 2 Mr. Monte Moore March 16, 2021 Since 2001, the Goodwins have lived in a large, manor-style home secluded on 83 +/-heavily­- wooded acres in far western Pulaski County. The Goodwins have always entertained at their home and used the home for events and gatherings. For the past several years, the Goodwins have occasionally used a small portion of their property to host charitable events and weddings, averaging two per month with the total number of events having never exceeded more than 27 events in a single year. The Goodwins have vehicular access to their home over two non-exclusive easements -one from Garrison Road, and another over an easement that runs from a gate on Kanis Road to a gate on the Goodwin property (the "Kanis Easement"). The Kanis Easement includes the right for the Goodwins as well as their "invitees" to use the easement. Around the year 2019, some of the owners of the other properties that use the Kanis Easement began to object to the Goodwins' use of the Kanis Easement. On or about October 14, 2019, shortly after the dispute over the Kanis Easement arose, the Goodwins received a Zoning Violation Warning Notice from the City of Little Rock that stated the Goodwins were in violation of the City of Little Rock Zoning Ordinance by using their home as an "event center." After receiving the Zoning Violation Warning Notice, the Goodwins contacted the City. The City told the Goodwins that the only way to resolve the violation was to petition the City to rezone their property as commercial. The Goodwins are now, and always have been, adamantly opposed to any designation of their property as "commercial." The primary use of the Goodwin home has always been as their family homestead. Even with the limited number of weddings and charitable events the Goodwins host, they still view their home as a residence and not a commercial property. On average it is their exclusive residence a minimum of 340 days per year. Nevertheless, after numerous discussions with the City, the Goodwins agreed to follow the City's recommendation and file an Application for a Planned Zoning Development (the "Application"). On or about April 2, 2020, the Goodwins filed the Application with the Little Rock Planning Commission to rezone their property from R-1 to PCD to allow the continued occasional use of a small part of their property to host charitable events and weddings. The City recommended the Planning Commission approve the Goodwin's Application. On or about September 24, 2020, the Little Rock Planning Commission heard the Application and voted 4 ayes, 5 nays, and 2 absent, resulting in a denial of the Application. The Goodwins timely filed and perfected an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of the Application to the Little Rock Board of Directors. On December 1, 2020, the Board heard the appeal of the Application from the Little Rock Planning Commission. The City conducted the December 1, 2020, Board meeting in person and with some Directors participating via Zoom or other digital means. There were some apparent technical difficulties with these digital connections that may have prevented some Directors from fully hearing presentations, Page 3 Mr. Monte Moore March 16, 2021 participating in the meeting, or even voting. Nevertheless, the City forged ahead with the public hearing on the Application and the Board's vote was 4 ayes, 3 nays, two absent, and one "present" vote. Because the Application did not obtain 6 votes in its favor, the Application was deemed denied. The Goodwins have filed an appeal of the Board of Directors decision with the Pulaski County Circuit Court, and that appeal is now pending. The Goodwins were informed by the City that their property is withing the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City and that it is zoned R-2. Little Rock City Code Section 36-254(b )(2) (the R-2 zoning ordinance) states that other uses permitted in the R-2 zone are home occupations as in the R-1 district. Section 36-253(b )(6) (the R-1 zoning ordinance) contains the specific provision related to home occupations. There are three general classifications under the home occupation provisions -permitted uses, prohibited uses, and uses that are neither permitted nor prohibited. First, Section 36-253(b)(6)(a) states that home occupations shall be permitted if they do not violate eleven factors. Second, Section 36-253(b)(6)(b) lists several categories of home occupations that will be permitted if they do not violate the aforementioned eleven factors. Section 36-253(b)(6)(c) lists twelve home occupations that are completely prohibited. Section 36-253(b)(6)(d) addresses those home occupations that are neither expressly permitted nor expressly prohibited by the ordinance. Goodwin Manor falls into this category. Such uses require an accessory use permit that is granted or denied by city staff. If staff does not grant the permit, then the applicant can appeal staff's decision to the Board of Adjustment. As an alternative to resolving these issues in court, the Goodwins filed an Application for Business License and a Home Occupation Accessory Use Application. The application included a set of conditions that Goodwin Manor would comply with during any charitable function or wedding. A copy of the applications and conditions are attached to this letter. Planning Department staff met with the Goodwins and reviewed their applications. On March 12, 2021, staff notified the Goodwins that it was rejecting their application. Appeal from Staff Decision The first application the Goodwins are filing with the Board of Adjustment is an appeal of staff's decision to deny the Application for Business License and Home Occupation Accessory Use Application. The Goodwins believe that due to the factors listed above, including but not limited to the remote location of their property, the enormous size of the property, the rural nature of the Ferndale neighborhood, the fact the City has stated the property is in the ETJ, and other factors support granting the Goodwins' Applications for a Business License and Home Occupation Accessory Use. The Goodwins respectfully request that the Board of Adjustment reverse the Page 4 Mr. Monte Moore March 16, 2021 decision of staff denying the Business License Application and Home Occupation Accessory Use Application and grant the application. Variance The second application the Goodwins are filing with the Board of Adjustment is a request for a variance from the provisions of Section 36-253(b)(6). Even if the Board of Adjustment finds that staff correctly denied the applications pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 36-253(b )( 6), the Goodwins respectfully request a variance from those provisions to allow the Goodwins to continue to host occasional charitable functions and weddings, subject to all of the conditions attached as Exhibit A to the Application for Business License and Home Occupation Accessory Use Application, which the Goodwins incorporate into this variance application by this reference. The Goodwins believe that the facts stated above show that it would be an undue hardship to require the Goodwins to comply with the provisions of Section 36-253(b)(6). Hearing I have a copy of the City's notice form from the Planning Department website. I will obtain the abstract company list of owners withing 200 feet of the Goodwin property, mail the required notices, and provide you with proof of mailing within the time required. I will obtain a notice sign and my client will post it on the property in accordance with applicable requirements. I will provide you the Affidavit from the Goodwins authorizing my firm and the Barber Law Firm, PLLC, to represent them in these matters. Please schedule both applications for a hearing before the Board of Adjustment at its next regular meeting and notify me of the date of the hearing. Thank you very much and please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments or if you need anything else from me or my clients. Cordially, ANDREW V. FRANCIS, P.A. Digitally signed by Andrew V. Andrew V. Francis Francis Date: 2021.03.16 14:30:15 -05'00' Andrew V. Francis /avf Enclosures Page 5 Mr. Monte Moore March 16, 2021 cc: Gary S. Goodwin Andrea Goodwin Mark Stodola MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 3 Z-9579 File No.: Z-9579 Owners: Brandon Baldwin Applicant: Brandon Baldwin Address: 4907 Crestwood Dr. Legal Description: Lot 94, Cliffwood Addition to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas Zoned: R-2 (Single-Family District) Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance(s) Requested: Request from the area provisions of Section 36-156 to permit more than 30% coverage of the rear yard for an accessory building and to permit an accessory structure with a reduced side yard setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated March 18, 2021. STAFF REPORT A.Planning and Development Civil Engineering: No Comments. B.Landscape and Buffers: In October 2020 the City adopted the "Heights Landscape Design Overlay District," requiring installation of one tree per 40 linear feet of street frontage within the Heights District Boundary, applicable to [among other types] residential construction in excess of 600 square feet. C.Building Codes: The required fire separation distance (building to property line) prescribed by the building code terminates at five (5) feet. Buildings are allowed to be closer than five (5) feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite one (1) hour fire resistance rating. When buildings are five (5) feet or more from the property line, the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself, only the projections such as eaves or overhangs. 1 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 3(CON'T.) Z-9579 Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three (3) feet from the property line and are prohibited when the exterior wall is less than three (3) feet from the line. There is no restriction on openings when the exterior wall is more than three (3) feet from the property line. Contact the City of Little Rock Building Codes at (501 )371-4832 for additional details. D.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located in the Heights Overlay District at 4907 Crestwood Street is occupied by a two-story single-family masonry home. An existing drive apron connects to the street along the east side of the property. The survey indicates that the rear yard is mostly unoccupied except for a concrete and partially dirt and gravel drive connecting the rear of the property to the street. The adjacent and surrounding properties are also predominantly single-family residences. The applicant is proposing to construct a three-car garage, behind the primary dwelling in the rear of the property. The new structure will be located 1-foot, 6-inches to approximately 3-feet from the east property line. A 6-feet easement is located adjacent to the south property line and the south wall of the proposed building is shown to be located just north of the easement. The rear and west side yard setbacks will comply with code requirements for accessory buildings. Sec. 36-156(a)(2)f states, "Accessory buildings shall maintain at least a three-foot setback from any side or rear yard property line except where said rear yard abuts on a dedicated alley. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the proposed accessory structure with a reduced setback from the east side of the property line. The rear yard for this property is approximately 1140 square feet. The new garage is indicated to be 794 square feet with an approximate 646 square feet located within the 25-foot rear yard setback. The new building is proposed to cover approximately 56% of the rear yard exceeding the maximum coverage requirements by 26%. Sec. 36-156(a)(2)c states, "Accessory buildings or structures in the R-1 through R- 4A districts ... may not occupy more than thirty (30) percent of the required rear yard area ... " This proposal is similar to other neighborhood installations. In Staffs opinion, the proposed rear yard coverage variance will pose no negative effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the general public, and will not detract from the value or aesthetic of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 3(CON'T.) Z-9579 E.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested coverage variance per the attached site plan subject to the following conditions: 1.A building permit being obtained for all construction. 2.Install any required trees in accordance with the Heights Landscape Design Overlay District. Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent. 3 March 18, 2021 Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 To whom it may concern Re: 4907 Crestwood Dr, Little Rock, AR 72207 Variance Approval I am asking for a Variance for the Area pr ovisions of Section 36-156 (2) (c) of the Little Rock Code of Ordinance to permit occupation of more than 30% of the required rear yard for an accessory building. I have attached an Elevation of the Proposed Garage, The Original Survey, and the Proposed Survey showing the Garage (accessory building) The Garage will be constructed to match the character of the house and neighborhood and will be set back from the East property line by 1' -6" as required by code. It will also be set back from the rear property line by 6' --0" as not to encroach on the Easement. The reasons for requesting the variance are as follows: •To house and Protect 3 Vehicles from Weather, Theft and Vandalism. •Keep 3 Cars from Congesting the Street and Detracting from the Character of the street. •Store lawn equipment and tools without the need for multiple unsightly storage sheds Calculations: •The Rear Setback measured from the rear property line x 25' is 1,156.2sf •The portion of the Accessory building within this 25' is 646sf •This equates to 55.8% •This is 25.8% over the allowable 300/4 coverage area. I am asking for your variance approval to construct this Garage (Accessory Building) as shown. Many people have chosen to demo these old houses and, in their place, build new houses with front loading garages. This changes the historic character of these neighborhoods. The house backs up to a green space so there is no rear neighbor. The driveway is approximately 11' wide therefore making visibility from Crestwood minimal. With the design matching the existing house I feel the character and integrity of the neighborhood will be maintained. Your consideration is appreciated. Sincerely Brandon Baldwin 501-410-0880 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 4 Z-9580 File No.: Z-9580 Owner: John Hughes Applicant: Ron Bene' Woods Address: 1724 S. Pine Street Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Heights Addition, Pulaski County, Arkansas Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-301 to allow a building addition with a reduced side yard setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated March 23, 2021. Present Use: Recreation Hall Proposed Use: Recreation Hall STAFF REPORT A.Planning and Development Civil Engineering: No Comments B.Landscape and Buffer Issues: 1.Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2.A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. The property is located in the City's designated mature area. A twenty-five (25%) percent reduction of the buffer requirements is acceptable. The minimum dimension of the perimeter planting strip shall be six (6) feet nine (9) inches. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30)linear feet of perimeter planting strip. The north and south perimeter planting strips are deficient. 1 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 4 (CONT.) Z-9580 3.Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street rights-of-way. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. 4.A land use buffer six (6) percent of the average width / depth of the lot will be required when an adjacent property has a dissimilar use of a more restrictive nature. As a component of all land use buffer requirements, opaque screening, whether a fence or other device, a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be required upon the property line side of the buffer. A minimum of seventy (70) percent of the land use buffer shall be undisturbed. Easements cannot count toward fulfilling this requirement. The plantings, existing and purposed, shall be provided within the landscape ordinance of the city, section 15-81. Screening requirements will need to be met adjacent to the north residential zoned property. Surveyor to mark and place protective fencing adjacent to the residential buffer before any site work begins. 7.An irrigation system shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. For developments of less than one (1) acre a there shall be a water source within seventy-five (75) feet of all plant material if an automatic irrigation system is not provided. 8.All landscape areas shall be protected as per City of Little Rock Landscape Ordinance (Sec. 15-100). Provide notes on plan specifying type and location of mulch, edging, wheel stops, and/or concrete curb and gutter. 9.All ground or roof mounted mechanical systems shall be screened from abutting properties and streets. Any trash receptacles or pickup shall be oriented away from a primary street side of the property and screened from the public right-of-way. Screen shall exceed the height of the dumpster or trash containment areas by at least two (2) feet no to exceed eight (8) feet total height. 10.The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. C.Staff Analysis: The C-3 zoned property located on the northwest corner of Pine and 18th Streets is occupied by a one-story masonry commercial building and a separate one-story frame residential structure. The commercial structure was built in 1919 and is positioned on the south property line. The front of the building faces east towards Pine Street and is located approximately 3-feet from the street right-of-way. The adjacent properties to the north and west across the alley are zoned R-3 and both are occupied with single family homes. The property across Pine Street is zoned R- 3 and includes a church and associated parking while a commercial building is located south of the subject property across 18th street on a C-3 zoned property. 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 4 (CON'T.) Z-9580 The existing masonry building to be retained is approximately 1,900 square feet and currently being utilized as a recreation hall. The applicant has stated that the frame structure will be demolished, and on-site parking will be provided in place of this former residence. The applicant is proposing a 550 square foot addition to the rear of the commercial building to serve as restrooms and a lounge area for the recreation hall. The site plan indicates that the walls of the new construction will be constructed in line with the side walls of the existing building and extend 17-feet 4-inches to the west. Additionally, 5 parking spaces are purposed between the building addition and the west property line which will be accessed from the alley. Section 36-301 (e)(2) states "No side yard shall be required except where abutting a residential district; then there shall be a side yard width of not less than fifteen (15) feet. On a ·corner lot, the side yard on the street side or exterior side shall be equal to the front yard setback." Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the building addition with a side yard setback of less than 1-foot and an interior side setback of approximately 14 feet. The existing building to remain does not fall within the front or side yard setback requirements of the current code. To provide an addition to this building that would comply with the setback requirements would only allow for a structure 7-feet in width. Staff views the side yard variance request as reasonable. The proposed reduced side yard setbacks will not be out of character with how this site has developed. In addition, the variance will allow the building expansion to advance in a logical progression. The proposed parking does not meet the north or south or perimeter planting strip requirements of a minimum of 6-feet 9-inches. A variance from The City Beautiful Commission will be required before the parking can be developed as indicated on the site plan. Staff recommends reducing the parking to 4 spaces and providing perimeter planting areas, landscape, and screening as per Chapter 15 - Landscaping and Tree Protection. D.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested building addition with a reduced side yard setback subject to the following conditions: 1.Compliance with the Landscape and Buffer requirements as noted in paragraph B.of the staff report. 2.Revise plan to remove/eliminate concrete curb and gutter from extending beyond north property line onto adjacent property and adjacent property alleyway frontage at the northwest portion of the site. 3 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 4 (CON'T.) Z-9580 Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent. 4 \¥GROUPINC WOODS GROUP ARCHITECTS March 23, 2021 Monte Moore Development Administrator City of Little Rock 723 West Markham Little Rock, Ar 72201 RE: 18th Street Recreation Mr. Moore: We are submitting the attached Site Plan for review by the Little Rock Board of Adjustment. The existing use of the building is a recreation hall, and this use will remain unchanged. We are requesting waivers from the setback requirements of this C-3 zoned property; so we can add an approximately 550 square-foot addition to the rear of the building. We are requesting variances from both side yard setbacks which if adhere to would only allow an addition that is 7 feet wide (see Site Plan). We are demolishing the residential structure to the west of this building to make way for five(S) new on-site parking spaces. Currently we only have street parking. We are also requesting landscape variances to allow for encroachments as shown on the Site Plan to install the new parking. This addition will allow my client to install some desperately needed restroom facilities and a lounge area away from the recreation area. We hope this submission is viewed favorably and we thank you for the opportunity to make this request. If there is any additional information required please contact our office or my cell listed below. Respectfully, WOODS GROUP ARCHITECTS Ron Bene' Woods President (501)425-4972 1401 BISHOP STREET ♦LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 ♦PH (501) 372-2230 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 5 Z-9581 File No.: Z-9581 Owners: Kelly Olson Applicant: Yeary Lindsey Architects Address: 2217 West Road Legal Description: Lot 120, Westover Hills Addition Zoned: R-2 Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance(s) Requested: A variance is requested from area regulations of Sec. 36-254 to allow a reduced rear yard and front yard setback in the R-2 district. A variance is requested from the building line provisions of Sec. 31-12 to allow a building addition which crosses a platted side yard building line. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated March 22, 2020. STAFF REPORT A. Planning and Development Civil Engineering Comments: No Comments. B. Buffering and Landscape Comments: No Comments. C. Building Codes Comments: No Comments. D. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 2217 West Road is located within a predominantly R-2 zoned neighborhood. The parcel occupies the southeast corner of West Road and Westover Drive with the home facing West Road. The survey indicates the lot to be 65 feet in width and 133.8 feet in length. A drive and attached garage are accessed on the north side of the property. MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 5 (CONT.) Z-9581 The applicant is proposing a new wrap around covered porch on the front and side of the house which will face the adjacent streets right-of-way. A 30-foot platted building line parallel with the west property line is indicated on the survey. The porch addition is indicated to project past this building line 7 feet into the 30-foot platted setback line leaving no less than 22.5 feet for a remaining front yard setback. This setback would slightly increase as the addition progresses northward leaving approximately 23 feet from the property line at the northwest corner of the addition. The north side of the porch will be in compliance with the 10% side yard setback. The applicant is also proposing to enclose the exiting garage on the east side of the home to create an additional living space. As part of this request an expansion of the home is being proposed to serve as a new 2-car garage. The proposed length of the primary structure will be approximately 99 linear feet expanding into the rear yard setback 19.7 feet. This will reduce a portion of the required 25-foot setback width to 6 feet. If this were an accessory structure (detached) it would be permitted in the rear yard with setbacks as narrow as three (3) feet and with no variance. Section 36-254(d)(3) states "There shall be a rear yard setback having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet." Section 36-254(d)(1) states, "There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet." Therefore, the applicant requests variances to allow the extension of the primary structure into the rear yard setback reducing the setback to no less than 6 feet and a reduction of the front yard setback to 23-feet. Section 31-12(b) of the City's Subdivision Ordinance states, " In those instances where a recorded subdivision plat has established building setback lines in accordance with this chapter variances of those lines shall only be granted by the Board of Adjustment." The platted front building setback for the subject property is 30 feet, and the requested setback is 23 feet. In Staff' s opinion, the proposed additions will pose no negative effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the general public, and will not detract from the value or aesthetic of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. If the Board approves the requested front platted building line variance, the applicant must then produce a one-lot replat reflecting the approved change. As such, the applicant must also review filing procedures with the County Clerk's office to determine if the replat will require a revised Bill of Assurance and respond as necessary and appropriate, as part of said replat. E. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested rear yard setback reduction from twenty-five (25) feet to a minimum of 6 feet, per the attached site plan. Staff additionally recommends approval of the requested platted building line from 30 feet to a minimum of 22.5 feet, subject to the following condition: Completion of a replat reflecting the above-described building line change. 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 5 (CONT.) Z-9581 Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent. 3 Yeary Lindsey Architects March 22, 2021 Mr. Tim Herndon Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Olson Residence Variance Request 2217 West Road Little Rock, AR 72207 Dear Tim, Please find attached our submittal to the Little Rock Board of Adjustments requesting a rear yard setback variance and variance to allow the crossing of a platted building line for the property at 2217 West Road. Our client hopes to convert her existing garage into a den and exercise room and allow for enlargement of an existing small bedroom. We are proposing the addition of a new 2 car garage directly east of the existing garage. This addition would require the rear yard setback to be reduced to 6' from the east property line. We feel this request is reasonable because the house is on a comer lot and the side yard to the south (which is what the owner considers her backyard) is 19.7' from the south property line and creates plenty of usable yard space and breathing room from the neighboring lot. We are also asking for a variance to allow the crossing of a platted building line to allow a covered wrap-around porch at the northwest comer of the house. The north side of the porch will project 10'-4" creating a side yard setback of 6'-8" at the porch area. This north side of the porch is in compliance with the 10% side yard setback requirement The west side ot the new porch is proposed to project 7' into a platted 30' building line that runs along West Road, reducing the front yard setback to 23' from the west property line. When traveling further to the south on West Road it is evident that some properties have already breached this 30' line. We feel that this new porch would blend nicely with the neighborhood and help the front façade feel more inviting. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me. We appreciate your consideration of our request. Thank you. Sincerely, Jtl@h ';Y Ellen Yeary, AIA 3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 501-372-5940 Fax: 501-663-0043 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 6 Z-9582 File No.: Z-9582 Owners: Carl / Kimberly Carter Applicant: Carl / Kimberly Carter Address: 3608 Doral Drive Legal Description: Lot 34, Block 9, Pleasant Valley Addition Zoned: R-2 Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance(s) Requested: A variance is requested from the building line provisions of Sec. 31-12 to allow a building addition which crosses a platted front yard building line. A variance is requested from area regulations of Sec. 36-254 to allow a reduced front yard setback in the R-2 district. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated March 15, 2021. STAFF REPORT A. Planning and Development Civil Engineering Comments: No Comments. B. Buffering and Landscape Comments: No Comments. C. Building Codes Comments: No Comments D. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located in the Pleasant Valley neighborhood at 3608 Doral Drive is occupied by a one-story two-family brick and frame home. The adjacent and surrounding properties are also occupied by single family residences except for a larger parcel further to the east zoned R-2 CUP which houses the Congregation B'nai Israel. The terrain along Doral is generally characterized as having a higher elevation on the north side of the street and sloping to the homes at a lower elevation to the south. The subject property is located on the south side of the road with drive access located on the east side of the property. 1 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 6 (CON'T.) Z-9582 The applicant is proposing to install a treated pine stairway approximately 24-feet in length from the street level of the property to the home's lower entry. The sketch provided indicates a 10-foot easement south of the property line adjacent to Doral Street and a 35-foot platted building setback line. The normally required front yard setback for R-2 zoned properties is 25-feet. The stairway will start immediately south of the 10-foot easement locating 14-linear feet of the proposed structure outside of the 25-foot building setback. The remaining 10-linear feet of the stairway will continue to extend southward and terminate at the 35-foot platted building line. Section 31-12(b) of the City's Subdivision Ordinance states," In those instances where a recorded subdivision plat has established building setback lines in accordance with this chapter variances of those lines shall only be granted by the Board of Adjustment." The applicant requests a variance to allow a reduction of the 35-foot platted front building setback to10-feet. Section 36-254(d)(1) states, "There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet." The applicant requests a variance to allow a reduction of the required front yard setback to 10 feet. The applicant has stated that there are existing stairway structures in the neighborhood that are similar in style and function as the proposed. In addition, the applicant has communicated that the design and location of the structure has been reviewed by the neighborhood homeowner's association and approved. In Staffs opinion, the proposed stairway will pose no negative effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the general public, and will not detract from the value or aesthetic of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. In addition, Staff finds the request to generally be in conformance with the development pattern in the neighborhood. Based on the above assessment and analysis, Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable. If the Board approves the requested front yard setback line variance, the applicant must then produce a one-lot replat reflecting the approved change. As such, the applicant must also review filing procedures with the County Clerk's office to determine if the replat will require a revised Bill of Assurance and respond as necessary and appropriate, as part of said replat. E.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested platted front building line reduction from 35 feet to a minimum of 10-feet, with the following condition: Completion of a replat reflecting the above-described building line change. 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 6 (CONT.) Z-9582 Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent. 3 BLACKWOOD CONSTRUCTION License No. 0408321221 Variance Application for 3608 Doral Drive Little Rock AR 72212 3/15/2021 Attn: Little Rock Board of Adjustment We are seeking to obtain a variance to construct a 24' Staircase within a 35' build line located at the North side of 3608 Doral Drive Little Rock AR 72212 as marked on provided survey. The staircase will be set of 10' from Doral Drive to observe 10' easement and will be constructed of treated pine set in concrete footings with 36" handrailing. The purpose of the proposed staircase is to ensure safe pedestrian traffic to and from the residence for the occupants and visitors. The grade of the hill is very steep and creates a hazard that could cause injury. The local HOA has already approved the style and location of the staircase and all residents with 200' of 3608 Doral Drive have been notified as requested with application process. To further support our approval there are already existing structures in the neighborhood that are very similar in style and purpose as to what we are proposing. We thank you for your consideration in this variance as it is paramount we ensure pedestrian safety while maintaining a visual appeal to the neighborhood. Sincerely, Jason Rogers Blackwood Construction I.LC MA7 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 7 Z-9583 File No.: Z-9583 Owners: Tract 1: RBA Broadway Partners, LLC Tract 2: Spring Street Holdings, LLC Applicant: Stephen R. Giles Address: Southeast Corner of Broadway Street and 7th Street Tract 1: 701 Broadway Street Tract 2: 403 W 7th Street Legal Description: Tract 1: Lot 1, 2, and 3 Block 107, of the original City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas Tract 2: Lot 10, 11, and 12 Block 107, of the original City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas Zoned: UU Urban Use District Present Use: Tract 1: Restaurant with drive-through service (Vacant) I Surface Parking Tract 2: Commercial I Restaurant/ Surfacing Parking Proposed Use: Drive-Thru Restaurant Variance(s) Requested: The drive-thru provisions of Sec. 36-342.1 to allow a new drive-through facility that is visible and takes direct access from the primary streets. The landscape provisions of Sec. 36-342.1 to eliminate the required street trees. The building orientation provisions of Sec. 36-342.1 to allow a building without orientation to the primary street. The street-level floor provisions orientation provisions of Sec. 36-342.1 to allow the ground level floor of a structure without the minimum surface area of 60% transparent or window display. The sign provisions of Sec. 36-342.1 to allow a ground mounted sign. 1 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 7 (CONT.) Z-9583 The provisions of use regulations of Sec. 36-342.1 to allow the number of seats in an outdoor seating area to exceed 50% of the seats within the eating place. The sign provisions of Sec. 36-557 to allow a on-premise sign without street frontage. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated March 23, 2021. STAFF REPORT A. Planning and Development Civil Engineering Comments: 1. At time of building permit, a 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Broadway St. and W. 7th St. 2. At time of building permit, repair or replace any curb, gutter, sidewalk and access ramps that are damaged and not in compliance with ADA recommendations in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 3. At time of building permit, obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 4. A franchise agreement must be approved by the Little Rock Board of Directors for the use of the public alley prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. At time of building permit, street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Public Works must approve completed plans prior to construction. 6. Prior to building permit, submit a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed project. Study should address trip generation, trip distribution, and queuing lengths for the development and also should take into account existing and projected traffic growth. 7. Damage to public and private property due to hauling operations or operation of construction related equipment from a nearby construction site shall be repaired by the responsible party prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. B. Buffering and Landscape Comments: 1. Site plan must comply with the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 36-342.1. UU Urban Use District and the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. Signage is to be reviewed and permitted separately. 3. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least 2 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 7 (CONT.) Z-9583 4. nine (9) feet wide. The property is located in the City's designated mature area. A twenty-five (25%) percent reduction of the buffer requirements is acceptable. The minimum dimension of the perimeter planting strip shall be six (6) feet nine (9) inches. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30)linear feet of perimeter planting strip. 5. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street rights-of-way. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. 6. For parking areas with twelve or more spaces eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). The minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be one hundred fifty (150) square feet for developments with one hundred fifty (150) or fewer parking spaces. 7. Building landscape areas shall be provided between the vehicular use area used for public parking and the general vicinity of the building. These shall be provided at the rate equivalent to planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. One (1) tree and four (4) shrubs shall be planted in the building landscape areas for each forty (40) linear feet of vehicular use area abutting the building. 8. An irrigation system shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. For developments of less than one (1) acre a there shall be a water source within seventy-five (75) feet of all plant material if an automatic irrigation system is not provided. 9. All landscape areas shall be protected as per City of Little Rock Landscape Ordinance (Sec. 15-100). Provide notes on plan specifying type and location of mulch, edging, wheel stops, and/or concrete curb and gutter. 10. All ground or roof mounted mechanical systems shall be screened from abutting properties and streets. Any trash receptacles or pickup shall be oriented away from a primary street side of the property and screened from the public right-of-way. Screen shall exceed the height of the dumpster or trash containment areas by at least two (2) feet no to exceed eight (8) feet total height. 11. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 12. Any Chapter 15, landscape code requirements that cannot be met may require a variance from the City Beautiful Commission. C. Building Codes Comments: No Comments 3 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 7 (CON'T.) Z-9583 D. Staff Analysis: Chick-fil-A is proposing to construct a new restaurant on the Urban Use (UU) zoned property located at the southeast corner of Broadway and W. 7th Streets. The applicant has stated that the property will be developed with a two-lane drive­ thru and order pick up windows. Traffic will ingress and egress from a modified Broadway curb cut and a second location from the current Spring Street drive curb. There will be no indoor dining, but outdoor dining and a service window will be provided for the restaurant. The proposed development consists of two separate tracts of land. The first tract is the site of a vacant former McDonalds restaurant on the corner of Broadway and W. 7th Streets. Surface parking is located south and east of the building. The second tract of land is located on the southwest corner of Spring and W. 7th Streets. This parcel is occupied by single commercial building built to the north, east and west, property lines. Surface parking is located south of the building. The west property line is adjacent to a platted alley that divides the two tracts. The applicants are requesting several variances from the UU district development criteria established in Section 36-342.1 (c). The variances are as follow: 1. Section 36-342.1. (c)(3) [Drive-in or drive-through facilities.] states, "No new drive­ in or drive-through facilities may be visible or take directed access from a primary street." (Broadway and Spring Streets). Drive-through facilities will be located on the northside of the building adjacent to W. 7th Street and will be visible from both 7th and Broadway Streets. 2. Section 36-342.1 (c)(5)(b) Landscaping. B. states, "Street trees a minimum of three-inch caliper shall be required ... The trees shall be located a minimum of two (2)feet off the back of a curb and shall be thirty (30) feet on center and no closer than thirty (30) feet to a street intersection with a water source provided ... " Broadway is a state/US Highway and the right-of-way is controlled by ARDOT. There are utilities on both 7th and Spring Streets which may prohibit the planting of street trees. The applicant is requesting that the requirement for street trees be eliminated adjacent to the proposed development. 3. Section 36-342.1 (c)(7) Building orientation, states, "Buildings must be oriented to the street. The primary entrance of the building shall be at street level on the street at the sidewalk. Entrances shall be designed so that the door will not swing beyond the property line." The building will not include indoor dinning or ordering. Drive-through service will be located adjacent to 7th Street and pedestrian traffic will order at widows facing Broadway separated by a drive aisle. 4 MAY 20, 2021 ITEM NO. 7 (CON'T.) Z-9583 4. Section 342.1 (c)(B) Street-level floor, states, "The ground-level (street fronting) floor of nonresidential structures shall have a minimum surface area of sixty (60) percent transparent or window display." Transparency requirements are requested to be less than 60% due interior public spaces not being provided. 5. Section 36-342.1 (c)(11) Signs, states, Ground-mounted signs are discouraged and may only be permitted as a variance as per division 2 of this chapter. If permitted the sign must adhere to the size requirements of Sec. 36-555 -Signs permitted in commercial zones. Applicant is requesting a variance to allow for a ground mounted sign. 6. Section 36-342.1 (d) Use Regulations, (1) a. 2. states, "The number of seats in the area of outdoor seating shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the number of seats within the eating place," The applicant is requesting outdoor seating to be allowed to exceed 50% interior requirement due to the elimination of the interior dining area. 7. Section 36-557 (a) Special provisions for on-premises signs and other sale promotion devices., states, "All on-premises wall signs must face required street frontage ... " The applicant is requesting an additional sign that will face the adjacent south property. This sign will be visible to traffic traveling north on Broadway. The applicant is attempting to develop a vehicular oriented restaurant and feels the UU requirements would not be favorable to this business and has noted that the requested variances have been granted to other drive-thru restaurants in the area. Staff believes that each of the requested variances is appropriate. E. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested variances, subject to compliance with the Public Works and Landscape comments outlined in paragraphs A & B of the staff report. Board of Adjustment (May 20, 2021) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent. 5 DOVER DIXON HORNE PLLC Attorneys at Law CYRIL HOLLINGSIIIIORTH MICHAEL 0. PARKER JOSEPH H. PURVIS JOHN B. PEACE MICHAEL G. SMITH GARY 8. ROGERS THOMAS S. STONE STEVE l. RIGGS GARLAND W. BINNS, JR. WILLIAM DEAN OVERSTREET MONTE D. ESTES 425 W, CAPITOL AVE STE 3700 LITTI.E ROCK., ARKANSAS 72201-3465 TELEPHONE {501) 375,9151 FACSIMILE (501) 375-6484 DARRELL D. DOVER (1933-2009) PHILLIP E DIXON (1932-2005) ALLAN W. HORNE (1932-2018) STEPHEN R. GILES JAMES PAUL BEACHBOARD CAL McCASTl,AIN CARL F, [TREY) COOPER, Ill ADRIENNE M. GRIFFIS WILLIAM J. OGLES WWW doyC?tdtx,oQh?:no g,m iii MERITAS MARK H. ALLISON RANDALL L. BYNUM ELIC. BAUER TODD WOOTEN MICHAEL M. POLLOCK T.J. LA\11/HON MATTHEW C. BOCH March 23, 2021 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Re-development of the North Half of Block 107 at the Intersection of Broadway and 7th Street Dear Zoning Administrator: This letter is to request zoning variances for the property described above. The variances are enumerated in the Application presented to Staff. Essentially, the re­ development will be for a new Chick-fil-A ("CFA") drive-thru restaurant at this location. CFA plans to remove the vacant former McDonald's restaurant building and the strip office/retail building facing 7 th Street. After demolition and removal CFA intends to construct a new restaurant with a two-lane drive-thru to order and pick-up windows. Traffic ingress and egress will be from the current Broadway drive cut and a second access drive on the east side off Spring Stmet at the curreint drive cut. There will be no indoor dining but there will be outdoor dining and window service as shown on the submitted site plan. The applicant has requested variances from the strict application of certain development regulations. Without these variances the applicant submits that it would suffer substantial hardship in that: a.The property is zoned UU Urban Use which is modeled to facilitate "pedestrian amenities" and "pedestrian-urban orientation". b. CFA is proposing essentially a vehicle oriented use which makes it unfeasible to comply with the requirements of the UU district. c. The applicant is basically requesting the same variances that have been granted to other drive-thru facilities in the area, such as the new McDonald's, Jimmy John's, Popeye's, Wendy's, Starbucks, and a branch bank and 8th and Broadway. DOVER DIXON HORNE PLLC Page 2 d. The re-design of this property will accomplish better traffic safety and security particularly at the ingress and egress points of the property. e. We request the variance from the building landscaping provisions of Chapter 15, Section 15-98 to not require building landscaping. Removing direct buil ding planting areas decreases the effect of water intrusion on the prepared foundation soils of the building and helps to remove potential areas for rodent hiding places around the perimeter of eating establishments. We respectfully submit our application and supporting document information for the variance request. Please let us know if any additional information is needed for the May 20, 2021, Little Rock Board of Adjustment meeting. Sincerely, DOVER IXON HORNE PLLC Stephen R. Giles Agent for Property Owners and Outside Counsel of Chick-fil-A, Inc. SRG/als Board of Adjustment 20-May-21 Webex Attendees Item# Name Email Phone# For/Against Speaker General Attendance George Bujarski georgebl@me.com 501-944-1556 Neutral No 7 Todd Rogers tmrogers@greydenlle.com -For If needed 7 Getra Sanders getra.sanders@cfacor .com -for If needed BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -VOTE RECORD DATE: 05-20-21 Time In / Time Out ALLISON, FRANK BERTRAM, JAMES GRINDER, AUSTIN JUSTUS, JOE LASHLEY, KATHERINE Time: 4:00PM In p A p A p ITEM & VOTE Item Number: Minutes 03-18-21 ALLISON, FRANK ✓ BERTRAM, JAM ES A GRINDER, AUSTIN ✓ JUSTUS, JOE A LASHLEY, KATHERINE ✓ Out Consent 1 2 ✓ ✓ Deferral A A A ✓ ✓ Deferral A A A ✓ ✓ Deferral 3 ✓ A ✓ A ✓ P= Present R=Webex 4 ✓ A ✓ A ✓ 5 6 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ A A A ✓ ✓ ✓ A A A ✓ ✓ ✓ _::/__AYE _•_NAVE ABSENT _JLRECUSE AB ABSTAIN Meeting Adjourned 4:11 PM MAY 20, 2021 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 4:11 p.m. Date: ------------ Chairman Secretary