Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutemail Richardson & Gentry about draft sept 2009Page 1 of 2 Malone, Walter From: Richardson, Ken Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:57 PM To: 'mwoods@smark.org'; Gentry, Frederick; Stodola, Mark; 'mstodola@catlaw.com'; Moore, Bruce; 'blallen@ualr.edu'; 'aricker@lcgdenver.com'; 'bcunningham@lcgdenver.com'; 'bobbyr@cals.org'; Bozynski, Tony; 'carlabackus@yahoo.com'; 'cvann@aristotle.net'; 'CAnderson@WRFoundation.org'; 'dave.roberts@craftontullsparks.com'; 'dprppy@sbcglobal.net'; 'dernst@cals.org'; Ehenger, Shelly; 'egustafson@bankozarks.com'; 'johnny@kincaiddp.com'; 'Julie.Luther@craftontullsparks.com'; 'mwperry@newfuturesforyouth.org'; Nayles, Dorothy; Thomas, Stuart; 'butlertoms@uams.edu'; 'bcdinc@aristotle.net' Cc: Coop, Griffin; Malone, Walter Subject: Re: Mike, Thanks for your comments. Point of clarification. We've involved actual residents from the beginning of our planning process and at every juncture throughout the process. We will need residential input as we develop the codes and specifics of our form base approach. Director Richardson From: michael woods <mwoods@smark.org> To: Gentry, Frederick; Stodola, Mark; mstodola@catlaw.com <mstodola@catlaw.com>; Moore, Bruce; Allen Barrett <blallen@ualr.edu>; Ann Ricker <aricker@lcgdenver.com>; Bill Cunningham <bcunningham@lcgdenver.com>; Bobby Roberts <bobbyr@cals.org>; Bozynski, Tony; Carla Backus <carlabackus@yahoo.com>; Charles Vann <cva n n@aristotle. net>; Corey Anderson <canderson@wrfoundation.org>; Dave Roberts <dave.roberts@craftontullsparks.com>; David Perry <dprppy@sbcglobal.net>; Don Ernst <dernst@cals.org>; Ehenger, Shelly; Eric Gustafson <egustafson@bankozarks.com>; John Kincaid <johnny@kincaiddp.com>; Julie Luther <Julie.Luther@craftontullsparks.com>; Mark Perry <mwperry@newfuturesforyouth.org>; Nayles, Dorothy; Richardson, Ken; Thomas, Stuart; Tom Butler <butlertoms@uams.edu>; William Robinson < bcdinc@aristotle. net> Cc: Coop, Griffin; Malone, Walter Sent: Tue Sep 15 13:43:35 2009 Subject: RE: Ken Thanks for the explanation and clarity. Based on paragraph 5 of your email, are we at the point of including a more diverse group, one that includes actual residents of the 12th Street Corridor, so that their input would be taken under advisement? From: Gentry, Frederick [mailto:fgentry@littlerock.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:51 AM To: Stodola, Mark; mstodola@catlaw.com; Moore, Bruce; Allen Barrett; Ann Ricker; Bill Cunningham; Bobby Roberts; Bozynski, Tony; Carla Backus; Charles Vann; Corey Anderson; Dave Roberts; David Perry; Don Ernst ; Ehenger, Shelly; Eric Gustafson; John Kincaid; Julie Luther; Mark Perry; michael woods; Nayles, Dorothy; Richardson, Ken; Thomas, Stuart; Tom Butler; William Robinson Cc: Coop, Griffin; Malone, Walter 9/15/2009 Page 2 of 2 Subject: Dear Steering Committee Members: Thanks for your responses regarding form based zoning. Several of you had some questions, concerns and good insight. I had a discussion with our Planning Staff to work through some of the dialogue in the emails that were sent. One concern was that form based zoning is more focused on the "form" of the building design versus the actual use of the land which might result in a "bunch of pretty liquor stores." Form Based zoning does go beyond building design and includes some land use requirements. Under current zoning a liquor store could open on any land that is already zoned `C-3' general commercial which is most of the property that fronts 12th Street west of the Hinton Resource Center however there are fewer properties zoned commercial on the east side. If the desire is to have non- residential along 12th street the possibility of more liquor stores exists with either the current zoning code or if Form Based code is used. To control the growth of liquor stores in the future other regulatory measures will have to be investigated and would have citywide affects. Another point brought up was whether or not the corridor's model supports the suggested extended area. If formed based zoning is adopted at this stage it would only be for the current boundaries until it can be determined what type of impact it would have on the Central High DOD which is now pending. If the form based concept is adopted the next step would be to hire a group that is familiar with this type of zoning who would help write the regulatory plan that would govern the corridor. This process would include a thorough inventory of existing conditions and education components. Working with area residents and property owners, the specifics of the code would be development. Education on the affects and meaning of the code would be done for the general public, local residents and owners as well as members of the development community and city staff. Particular efforts to help enforcement staff understand the new code and correct methods for enforcement would be included. Thanks, Ken Richardson City Director, Ward 2 Frederick Gentry Assistant to the Board of Directors City of Little Rock 371-6801 500 West Markham Room 203 9/15/2009