HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutesMarch 18, 1999
ITEM NO.: 7 FILE NO.: LU99-11-02
Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - I-430 Planning District
Location: 1001 Embassy Drive
Request: Office to Commercial
Source: Dan Robinson for Embassy Suites Hotel
PROPOSAL / REQUEST:
Land Use Plan amendment in the I-430 Planning District from
Office to Commercial. The Commercial category includes a broad
range of retail and wholesale sales of products, personal
services, and general business activities. Commercial activities
vary in type and scale, depending on the trade are they serve.
CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING:
The property is currently zoned R-2 and is approximately 4.5
acres in size. This site adjoins the Embassy Suites Hotel to the
north (a PDC in a MOC classification), to the south lies single
family homes and a paint shop that have access off of Kanis Road.
That area is also zoned R-2 and is shown as Office. To the west
is an undeveloped tract of land zoned POD in an office
classification and to the east lies C-2 zoned property that
currently has single family houses on it and is shown as
Commercial.
RECENT AMENDMENTS:
May 20, 1997, a change from Office to Commercial for an area
north of Chenal Parkway between Bowman and Autumn Roads.
June 18, 1996, various changes occurring with the John Barrow
Neighborhood Plan.
MASTER STREET PLAN:
Financial Center Parkway is shown as a principal arterial on the
plan. The Master Street Plan shows the extension of Embassy
Drive to the south to intersect with Centerview Drive at Kanis.
It is to be a Collector Street and will curve on the southern
half to meet Centerview as shown by the dashed line on the Plan
Amendment graphic.
March 18, 1999
ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.)
PARKS:
FILE NO.: LU99-11-02
The closest area of park land to the site is Rock Creek, which
lies in the median of Chenal Parkway from Bale Chevrolet to the
eastern Kanis intersection and an additional area that the city
owns that lies to the north and west of the Bowman and Markham
intersection.
BACKGROUND:
This area has seen major growth in the past ten years changing
from a rural area to the heavier intensity that it is today. The
Land Use Plan, during that time, has slowly been changed from
residential uses to more intense uses. At this time, there is
still an inventory of Commercial area that has not been
developed.
While the application is associated with the Embassy Suites
Hotel, this will place Commercial off of Financial Center Parkway
for unusually large depth. This site will be accessed off of
Embassy Drive. This in turn may encourage the entirety of
Embassy Drive to be Commercial. That commercialization of the
corner of Embassy Drive, Kanis and Centerview would be in
conflict with the recently adopted (3-2-99) Land Use Plan for the
Kanis Corridor.
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN:
This area is covered by the Rock Creek Neighborhood Plan dated
November 1998. The plan did not make any land use plan changes.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations:
John Barrow Neighborhood Association, Sandpiper N.A., Twin Lakes
"A" Neighborhood Assoc., Campus Place N.A., Kensington Place
N.A., Westbrook N.A., Birchwood Neighborhood Association,
Pennbrook/Clover Hill Place N.A., Sewer District #147, and Twin
Lakes "B" Neighborhood Assoc. Staff has received no comments from
area residents.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is not appropriate at this time.
2
March 18, 1999
ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: LU99-11-02
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 18, 1999)
Brian Minyard of Staff presented the item and referenced the
letters of support that was given to the Commissioners at the
agenda meeting.
Chairman Earnest asked a question of Mr. Minyard as to the
extension of the collector street known as Embassy Drive. Mr.
Minyard referenced the graphics provided in the agenda.
Dan Robinson spoke in behalf of Embassy Suites Hotel and made a
brief presentation of the history of the site and nature of the
hotel company. He continued to speak of the financial
investment and benefits to the City in the form of taxes. He
continued to speak of the extension of Embassy Drive. Mr.
Robinson indicated that the future plans include additional
rooms, conference space, additional parking and ancillary
restaurant facility to support the hotel.
He continued to speak about traffic patterns and the overall
traffic pattern to Shackleford Road to the south.
Commissioner Putnam asked for clarification as to the nature of
the expansion.
Commissioner Faust stated that hotel motel is listed as a
conditional use in 02. She asked of the applicant why he was
seeking to change the Land Use Plan. Mr. Robinson replied that
they were seeking an actual use for a hotel in C-3. If the site
was larger, it could be filed in C-2; or if detailed plans were
available, the PCD could be amended. Commissioner Faust stated
that she was still not clear and asked Mr. Minyard if she was
missing something. Mr. Minyard reiterated that the applicant
does not have detailed plans of what they want to do. He further
clarified the options of revising the PCD, 02 with a CUP in
Office, and changing the Land Use Plan amendment. Mr. Minyard
further stated that conversations had taken place with the
applicant to explain all the options and that the applicant had
chosen to revise the Land Use -Plan in lieu of providing specific
plans for development.
Commissioner Putnam asked if they owned the land. Mr. Robinson
stated that they had it under contract subject to commercial
zoning. Discussion followed that the Commercial on the Land Use
3
March 18, 1999
ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: LU99-11-02
Plan would open up a multitude of uses in addition to the hotel
uses. Mr. Putnam asked to have specific plans for development on
the site and not open it up for all commercial applications.
Commissioner Berry stated to the applicant that if the applicant
was turned down for the Land Use Plan amendment, that he
suspected that they would be back with a conditional use permit.
Jim Lawson interjected that the applicant wants C-3, not a
conditional use permit. Commissioner Berry wanted to clarify
that nothing restricts the applicant from coming back and
applying for an expansion of his current PZD under Office on the
Land Use Plan. Mr. Lawson stated that he did not think that was
the case, and that the applicant's deal would be off if he did
not get the C-3 zoning.
Mr. Robinson stated that when Mr. Hammond buys a piece of
property to develop, he wishes to have commercial zoning that
permits the development. -He spoke of timing to buy the property,
develop the plans, and obtain the zoning. He stated that he does
not have the detailed plans at this time.
Commissioner Putnam spoke of amending the PCD. Mr. Lawson stated
that the applicant wants C-3 zoning which would not require any
PZD or any review.
Commissioner Mizan asked if the land could be sold after being
changed to C-3 if a downturn in the hotel market occurred. Mr.
Robinson stated that the land could be sold but due to street
patterns and topography, the site does not lend itself to be
there unless there is a direct relation to the hotel.
Mr. Lawson stated that he is not necessarily opposed to the
extension of the hotel, but what does not make sense to the staff
is the fact that Commercial would be fronted by Office on Kanis
Road. He further explained that was not his intention, but
stated that would be the case.
Mr. Robinson spoke of the future of the intersection of Embassy
Drive, Centerview Drive and Kanis and the land use pattern.
Commissioner Downing asked Mr. Lawson to explain the zoning
process. Mr. Lawson stated that if it were changed to commercial
today, they would come back for C-3 zoning. Then it would be
sold to Mr. Hammond and at some point it would be developed by
Mr. Hammond. If it comes in with more than one building, it
would require site plan review. If it were one huge building
4
March 18, 1999
ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: LU99-11-02
with a parking deck, he would just need to get a building permit.
There is uncertainty as to how this relates to the PCD that was
approved.
Ruth Bell, of the League of Women voters, stated her opposition
to the proposed Land Use Plan change. She stated that it is not
in the best interest of the city without knowing a lot more
details.
Commissioner Putnam asked Mr. Lawson if there was some way to
allow this to pass. Mr. Lawson stated that he had been thinking
and was not able to come up with any solution yet.
Commissioner Downing stated when the real world considers future
expansion; pieces of property do not always fall into place at
the time that their plans are ready. He continued to speak of
surrounding uses and the compatibility of those uses with the
proposed use.
Commissioner Hawn spoke of othe Kanis Road Land Use Plan that was
recently adopted.
Commissioner Faust noted the March 2, 1999 adoption of the Land
Use Plan along Kanis. She spoke of the options of C-3 and the
adopted Land Use Plan does not preclude the development of the
hotel.
Commissioner Berry spoke of the Land Use Plan trying to mitigate
impact, but without knowing what the development is, the
Commission is afraid of going commercial and continued to speak
of the process. Chairman Earnest noted that with performance
zoning the same conversation would be taking place.
Walter Malone of staff, added that this property was not changed
in the Kanis Corridor Land Use Plan that was recently adopted.
Discussion followed with Commissioner Putnam as to whether this
site had been the subject of a Land Use Plan amendment before.
Mr. Lawson stated that it was the piece to the southwest of the
site. He continued to speak about both the applicant and the
city limiting their risks concerning buying and zoning of the
property.
Commissioner Hawn made a motion to approve the motion and the
motion failed with a vote of 3 ayes, 7 nays and 1 absent.
0