HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutesMay 14, 1998
Item No.: 3 Fig NQ.,:,.LU98-12-02
arae: Land Use Plan Amendment - 65th Street West District
Location: 6400 Stagecoach Road
Request: Single Family to Office
Source: John E. Kurtz
We] " Lai ;
A Land Use Plan amendment in the 65th Street West Planning District changing from Single
Family to Office. Total acreage for the proposed amendment is approximately one-third of an
acre (0.34±). Office represents services provided directly to consumers (such as legal, financial
and medical) as well as general offices that support more basic economic activities.
CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING:
The property is currently zoned R-2 Single Family and is shown on the plan as Single Family.
All tracts adjacent to the site are also zoned R-2. Across Stagecoach Road is a convenience store
that is shown as Neighborhood Commercial. Directly south of the site across Stagecoach Road
is David O. Dodd Elementary School. To the east, west and north of the site area single family
homes. The homes along Stagecoach Road are in good repair and sit on large lots. The area
along David O. Dodd is a stable area of older homes.
RECENT AMENDMENTS%
March 17, 1998, a change was made from Multi Family and Single Family south of Talley Road
adjacent to I-30 to Services Trades District.
A change was made from Parks / Open Space, Multi Family and Single Family on the west side
of Shackleford Road north of Stagecoach Road to Services Trades District.
A change from Multi -family and Parks / Open Space on the east side of Shackleford Road north
of Stagecoach Road to Office and Public Institutional.
December 19, 1995, a change from Single Family along both sides of Stagecoach Road east of
I-430 to Commercial, Mixed Use and Park/Open Space.
May 7, 1991, the area shown as Neighborhood Commercial was reduced at the intersection of
David O. Dodd and Stagecoach and at the intersection of Stagecoach and Shackleford.
PLAN:MASTER SIREET
David O. Dodd and Stagecoach Road are shown as a Minor Arterials on the plan. Stagecoach
Road is currently a two lane road. There are no plans to widen the road within the next five to
ten years with current development patterns.
BACKGROUND:
This is a section of Little Rock which has not changed much in the last decade. There has been
no indication of any major changes in the next few years. The roads are not proposed for
widening and thus no change should be expected in the next five or more years. Under these
conditions, the existing single family character, the 'neighborhood' can be expected to continue.
The amendment presented is a result of an enforcement case. The current occupant has
converted a house to an office. However, both to the north near Colonel Glen and south near I-4-
30 are vacant available areas either zoned or shown on the Plan as appropriate sites for office or
commercial uses. No evidence has been presented to show why the Plan should be changed to
increase the amount of non-residential use in the area.
N-EIGHBORIJOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Crystal Valley and Pecan Lake.
As of printing date, we have received _ letters/comments in response and in opposition
and questions with a neutral response.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS;
Staff believes that a change to any non-residential use is not appropriate at this time.
�-II:�Iiil�i;Lsi��]uluL��•�.Ci�i;1:[�31-11-[a� • • ;
Brian Minyard of the Planning Staff presented the item to the Commission and stated the Staff
recommends denial.
John Kurtz, applicant, spoke of existing businesses and other non-residential uses in the area. He
spoke of the low traffic volume of his business and the suitability of the building to his needs.
Commissioner Adcock asked if his business was conducted by phone or if people came to his
office. The response was that few people came to his office and most business was conducted
via phone or fax machine. He stated that no one lived on site and office hours were normally 8
to 5.
Sandy Berryman, spoke in support of the applicant and spoke of drainage problems.
John Rognrud spoke in opposition of the application. He presented photos of the site. He spoke
of living in the neighborhood for 35 years and that the area was quite and rustic. He spoke
against the intrusion of commercial and industrial. He asked the commission to deny that
change.
Commissioner Putman asked Mr. Rognrud if he had a problem with office if it is a POD. Mr.
Rognrud stated that the structure should be a single family house and that there were office space
downtown.
Commissioner Berry asked staff when the area was reviewed last. Walter Malone answered that
it was in 1989.
Commissioner Muse asked what was occupied as a house prior to the offices.
John Rognrud stated that he thought that the school bus stopped there and was questioning the
safety factor.
James Corbitt stated that the structure had been improved since the current owner had taken
over.
Julie Wilson, resident of David O Dodd spoke of the family that lived in the house prior to the
mortgage company.
Chairman Lichty asked how long Mr. Kurtz had been in business. Mr. Kurtz spoke that the
corporation had been formed in June of 1997. When he purchased the property, he stated that he
spoke with the planning department and that the property was non -conforming status, but since
then, the cards had vanished. He also stated that the rock is leftover from the sewer
improvements.
Commissioner Putman asked how long the company had been in the structure. The applicant
answered that it was around the end of December. When asked, the applicant stated that he knew
it was a non -conforming use.
Commissioner Adcock asked of staff as to the question of non -conforming status. Jim Lawson
stated that according to our files, this is not a non -conforming use.
Commissioner Hawn made a motion to approve item as presented and was seconded. The item
was denied by a vote of 0 ayes, 8 noes, and 2 absent and 1 abstention.