HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutesJuly 6, 2000
ITEM NO.: 4
Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - 65th Street East
District
Location: Various
Request: Commercial, Industrial, Mixed Commercial
Industrial, Multifamily, Single Family, Low
Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial
and Public Institutional to Single Family,
Multifamily, Public Institutional, Commercial,
Park/Open Space, Low Density Residential, Mixed
Use and Service Trades District.
STAFF REPORT
As part of the review of the Geyer Springs and Wakefield
area, the adopted Land Use Plan was reviewed. A set of Land
Use Plan changes were developed to more accurately reflect
the existing as well as the likely short and mid-term uses.
The changes are scattered over an approximate 3 square mile
area. This report will review each change one at a time
rather than use the customary format for Land Use Plan
Amendments.
1. The site is either side of 53rd Street west of Geyer
Springs Road, the existing use is a church and related
uses. Currently, the Land Use Plan shows the church as
Public Institutional; however, the education building
is shown as Commercial and the..church office and
parking are shown as Single Family. To the west is
commercial, east is multifamily and south is single
family for both use and Plan. No adjacent street is
classified as collector or above by the Master Street
Plan. The proposal is to recognize the entire site as
Public Institutional.
2. The area is north of Mabelvale Pike near Sunnydale, the
existing is a single family structures which has been
cut into several rental units and a large vacant area.
The future land use is Multifamily. The proposed
change is to Low Density Residential. The existing
uses to the west, north and south are single family as
July 6, 2000
File No.: 4 (Cont.)
is the proposed use. To the east is an existing
commercial center which is shown as Commercial on the
Plan. Mabelvale Pike is a minor arterial and is
proposed to be widened from the current two lanes.
3. A large area between University Avenue and Geyer
Springs Road south of 57th Street is the next area.
Most of the area is currently used by auto related
retail uses - car lots, installation shops, etc. Some
of the area is vacant or has other retail uses. The
Plan shows Mixed Commercial Industrial for the area in
question. To the west and north are commercial
existing and planned uses. South of the site is shown
as Industrial and to the east is single family homes
with a Plan designation Single Family. The proposed
change is to Commercial. University is a primary
arterial and Geyer Springs Road is a minor arterial.
V
4. An area south of 57th Street and east of Geyer Springs
Road is a church parking area. The Plan shows the use
as Single Family. To the north is the church shown as
Public Institutional. To the south and east is single
family use and designated as such on the land use plan.
To the west is auto related commercial uses with a
Mixed Commercial Industrial classification. The
proposal is to change the area to Public Institutional.
Geyer Springs Road is classified as a minor arterial by
the Master Street Plan.
5. At the northeast and southeast corner of Geyer Springs
Road and 65th Street are several small retail buildings
and a mobile home park. The Land Use Plan recommends
Mixed Commercial Industrial. To the west is Industrial
on the Plan and is a mix of light industrial and heavy
commercial uses such as auto repair and warehousing.
To the south is a warehouse showroom designated Mixed
Commercial Industrial. To the north and east is Sysco
Foods which is shown as Mixed Commercial Industrial.
The proposal is to change the area to Commercial. Both
Geyer Springs Road and 65th Street are classified as
minor arterial by the Master Street Plan.
6. At the northeast corner of Big Oak Lane and Geyer
Springs Road is a warehouse showroom designated Mixed
Commercial Industrial on the plan. To the north is a
retail center shown as Mixed Commercial Industrial on
the Plan. To the south is residential and commercial
E
July 6, 2000
File No.: 4 (Cont.)
structures shown as Commercial on the Plan. West of
the site is a warehouse shown as Industrial on the
Plan. While to the east the existing use is single
family which is planned for Single Family. The
proposed change is to Service Trades District. Geyer
Springs Road is classified as a minor arterial while
Big Oak Lane is not classified a collector or above by
the Master Street Plan.
7. An area generally between Battle and Geyer Springs
Roads north of 65th Street is currently used as Sysco
Foods warehouse - distribution center. The Plan
recommends Mixed Commercial Industrial. To the north
and northeast are single family and mobile home uses
with Single Family shown on the Plan. To the west and
south are areas of commercial and office uses shown as
Mixed Commercial Industrial. To the east is a
warehouse/distribution use shown as Mixed Commercial
Industrial. The new proposed use is Light Industrial.
Both Geyer Springs Road and 65th Street are designated
minor arterials while Battle does not have a collector
or above classification on the Master Street Plan.
B. An area either side for 65th Street, east of Battle is
currently warehouse showroom types of uses. To the
northeast and south are single family homes which are
shown as Single Family on the Plan. To the east are
commercial businesses, shown as Commercial on the Plan.
West of this area is shown as Mixed Commercial
Industrial with warehouse/distribution use to the
northwest and commercial businesses to the southwest.
The proposal is to change the Plan to Service Trades
District for this location. 65th Street is shown on the
Master Street Plan as a minor arterial, no other
adjacent street is classified collector or above.
9. South of 65th Street between Battle and Lancaster Roads,
a site is shown for Mixed Commercial Industrial and is
retail commercial use. To the north, west and south
are warehouse/retail uses shown as Mixed Commercial
Industrial on the Plan. A commercial retail center is
located to the east and shown as Commercial on the
Plan. The suggested change is to Commercial. The
Master Street Plan shows 65th Street as a minor
arterial.
3
July 6, 2000
File No.: 4 (Cont.i
10. Either side of Lancaster Road north of 65th Street is
shown for Commercial west of Lancaster Road and
Multifamily east of Lancaster Road. To the north are
single family homes, shown as Single Family on the
Plan. East of the site is an apartment complex shown
as Multifamily on the Plan. The areas south and east
are shown on the Plan as Commercial and are commercial
businesses. The current use for the site is single
family. The proposed use for the Plan is Single
Family. No adjacent road is classified collector or
above on the Master Street Plan.
11. An area either side for Patterson Road between Hoffman
and the Union Pacific rail line is shown for Commercial
and is used for mini -warehouse, warehouse/showroom and
a strip center which is primarily office use. East of
V
the site is industrial (warehouse and fabrication)
shown as Industrial on the Plan. To the south the Plan
shows Industrial with a use pattern of office (union
halls, etc.) and warehouse/showroom. Single family
homes are located to the east with Single Family shown
on the Plan. North of the site is a city park, open
space and a landfill, the Plan shows Park/Open Space.
The suggested use for this area is Service Trades
District. Patterson Road is classified a collector by
the Master Street Plan no other adjacent roads are
classified collector or above.
12. The area west of Patterson Road from Hoffman Road south
has a use pattern of support office (union halls, etc.)
and office warehouse/showroom, with a future land use
of Industrial. The areas to the east and south are
shown on the Plan for Industrial and have uses such as
warehouse/distribution or fabrication. To the west are
single family homes shown as Single Family on the Plan.
North of the site is shown for Commercial on the Plan
with mini -warehouse and office (in a strip center)
uses. The suggested use for the site is Service Trades
District. The only road classified as collector or
above is Patterson Road (a collector).
13. An area either side of Wakefield Drive south of 65th
Street is shown for Mixed Commercial Industrial and is
a mix of commercial uses. To the north and east, the
Plan shows Industrial, currently to the north is
industrial use but to the east is open space. South of
4
July 6, 2000
File No.: 4 (Cont.)
this area is shown as Single Family on the Plan with
homes currently located there. To the west is a
apartment complex shown as Multifamily on the Plan.
The recommended changed is to Commercial. 65th Street
is classified as minor arterial by the Master Street
Plan, no other adjacent street is classified collector
or above.
14. This area is the City's Fire Training facility, and is
shown as Single Family and located west of Doyle
Springs Road across from Clemont Drive. The
surrounding use is single family, likewise the adopted
Land Use Plan shows Single Family surrounding the site.
The recommended change is to Public Institutional. No
adjacent road is classified collector or above by the
Master Street Plan.
15. The site is the northwest corner of Doyle Springs and
Young Roads, the current use is a church with a Plan
designation of Single Family. To the north and west
are single family homes shown as Single Family on the
Plan. To the south is I-30 with support service
industrial uses further to the south. East of the site
is shown for Industrial on the Plan with an existing
use of commercial. The proposal is to change the Plan
to Public Institutional for this site. No adjacent
street is classified collector or above by the Master
Street Plan.
16. The northwest corner of Dartsmouth Drive and Young Road
is shown on the Plan as Low Density Residential. The
current use is open space (vacant). Single family
homes are located to the east, west and north with a
Plan designation of Single Family. To the south, the
Plan calls for Neighborhood Commercial with a mix of
commercial and vacant land currently. The suggested
Plan Change is to Mixed Use. Young Road is classified
as a collector by the Master Street Plan, no other
adjacent roads is classified collector or above.
17. South of Young Road from Portsmouth Drive to west Eda
Drive is a mix of commercial and vacant lots. The
adopted Land Use Plan recommends Neighborhood
Commercial. To the north and west are generally single
family use (with some vacant), shown as Single Family
on the Plan. South of this area is I-30 with support
office, retail and public uses further south. To the
5
July 6, 2000
File No.: 4 (Cont.)
east are commercial business designated Commercial on
the Plan. The proposed change is to Mixed Use. Young
Road is classified a collector by the Master Street
Plan. No other adjacent street is classified collector
or above.
18. This area is either side of Eda Drive and to the north,
with a use pattern of single family along Eda Drive and
multifamily to the north. The Plan shows the entire
area as Low Density Residential. East of the site is
Single Family on the Plan and larger lot single family
use. To the west and north are commercial uses with
the Plan classification of Commercial. South of the
site is shown as Neighborhood Commercial with a use
pattern of commercial and vacant. The suggested Plan
change is to Mixed Use. Young Road is classified a
collector by the Master Street Plan. No other adjacent
road is classified collector or above.
19. The site is east of Woodson Road and south of Halifax
Drive. The current use is a city park with a
classification of Public Institutional on the Plan. To
the north and west, the Plan shows Single Family and
the use is single family. The Plan shows Public
Institutional to the east and south where churches
exist. The suggested Plan change is to Park/Open
Space. No adjacent road is classified a collector or
above by the Master Street Plan.
Within the 65th Street East Planning District, there have
been three approved plan changes in the last four years.
There were two in 1996. Both were northwest of the
Forbing/Geyer Springs Road intersection. In February 1996,
the single family homes along Myerson Road west of Geyer
Springs Road were changed from Industrial to Mixed Use with
those on Geyer Springs changed to Suburban Office. Later
that year, in June, an area of Commercial along Forbing Road
was changed to Industrial.
The final amendment in the district was approved a year ago
(July 1999). That request was to allow the expansion of
Sysco Foods across Battle Road. It changed Single Family to
Mixed Commercial Industrial with an open space corridor
adjacent to a single family neighborhood.
R
July 6, 2000
File No.: 4 (Cont.)
The neighborhood associations in the area were contacted in
May to get suggestions and comments. No response was
received from either the Geyer Springs or Wakefield
Neighborhood Association. Staff identified property owners
using Pulaski County Assessor records in late May. tach
property owner was sent a certified letter explaining the
Land Use change and requesting response (agree/disagree).
This notice resulted in about two dozen informational calls
and a similar number of "agree" responses. As of the
writing of this report only one owner (5610 65u' Street) had
responded with a "disagree".
The Land Use Plan changes included in this item are intended
to more accurately reflect the existing conditions and
likely short to mid-term development pattern within the
area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approval
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(JULY 6, 2000)
Chair Adcock and Walter Malone, Planning Staff, discussed
what should be presented. Commissioner Downing asked if any
commissioner had questions.
Mr. Malone reviewed two changes staff wished to make based
on comments received from property owners. The first was
east of Patterson Road, leaving a commercial designation
(Subarea 11). This area is zoned C-4 Commercial and used
for auto related commercial. None of the other areas
proposed for Service Trades is zoned commercial. The second
was either side of Battle Road, north of 65u' Street (parts
of Subareas 7 and 8). This area would remain Mixed
Commercial Industrial. It is zoned Industrial, with an
industrial use but staff is open to allowing the possibility
of a downzone to Commercial.
Commissioner Lowry moved the approved item 4 as revised
by Staff less Subareas 7, 8 and 10. By a vote of 10 for
0 againsts (Commissioner Nunnley absent) the motion was
approved.
7
July 6, 2000
File No.:
4 (Cont.)
Commissioner Lowry moved approval of Subareas 7, 8 and 10
as revised by Staff. By a vote of 9 for 0 againsts
(Commissioner Nunnley absent, Commissioner Lowry not
voting). The motion was approved.
8
LDR
PK/OS
>-01
c
c
PK/OS
LDR
wal
%1
PK/OS
mfAR