Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutesAugust 3, 2000 ITEM NO.: C FILE NO.: LU00-16-03 Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - Otter Creek Planning District Location: 12800 County Line Road. Request: Single Family to Commercial Source: Doug Loftin PROPOSAL / REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Otter Creek Planning District from Single Family to Commercial. The Commercial category includes a broad range of retail and wholesale of products, personal and professional services, and general business activities. Commercial activities very in type and scale, depending on the trade area that they serve. The applicant wishes to develop the property under review for a day care center and a mini -storage warehouse. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-2 Single Family Residential and is approximately 3.54 + acres in size. The property to the north and east is zoned R-2 Single Family Residential and is occupied by the Irish Spring subdivision. A convenience store is located to the west on a piece of property zoned C-3 General Commercial at the northeast corner of the Vimy Ridge / County Line Road intersection. The property to the south lies in Saline County and in the city limits of Shannon Hills. It is zoned R-1 Single Family. Directly across county Line road lies Davis Elementary school, part of the Bryant School district. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: On November 4, 1997 three changes took place from Low Density Residential to Single Family along both sides of Vimy Ridge Road with in a mile north of the applicant's property. On November 4, 1997 a change was made from Low Density Residential to Commercial at the northwest corner of the August 3, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU00-16-03 Vimy Ridge / County Line Road intersection about 300 feet west of the applicant's property. In November 21, 1995 various changes were made on both sides of Vimy Ridge Road on large tracts of land within a mile north of the applicant's property, one of those changes included the change Neighborhood Commercial to Commercial west of the applicant's property on the northeast corner of the Vimy Ridge / County Line Road intersection west of the applicant's property. The applicant's properties, as well as the property to the north and east, are all shown as Single Family on the Land Use Plan West of the applicant's property are two areas shown as Commercial on the northwest and northeast corners of Vimy Ridge Road and County Line Road. The area to the south of the applicant's property is located in Saline County. The Shannon Hills Comprehensive Development Plan shows the southwest corner of the intersection as Commercial and the southeast corner as Park/Elementary School. The remainder of the area along Vimy Ridge Road and County line road is shown as Residential. MASTER STREET PLAN: Vimy Ridge Road is shown as a minor arterial from Alexander Road to the Saline County line. County Line Road is shown as a minor arterial from Vimy Ridge Road with a proposed extension east as a minor arterial to connect to the proposed South Loop. Vimy Ridge Road is also shown as continuing south from the County Line through Shannon Hills as a minor arterial on the Central Arkansas Transit System (CARTS) Future Classification Plan. The CARTS Future Classification Plan shows County Line Road as a major collector from Vimy Ridge Road to the Donnie Drive / Joan Drive intersection in Shannon Hills. Both the Master Street Plan and the CARTS Future Classification Plan show County Line Road continuing west from the intersection with Vimy Ridge Road as a residential street. PARKS: The Master Parks Plan does not show any parks, existing or proposed, effected by this amendment. 2 August 3, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU00-16-03 CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The Chicot West / I-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan states the recommendation of concentrating "...development efforts in the more urbanized northern portion of the study area..." and "...view the southern portion of the study area as an `urban reserve' to be developed as market forces become stronger in the area." This amendment is located next to the southern boundary of the study area. ANALYSIS: Much of the area surrounding the Vimy Ridge / County Line Road intersection consists of large tracts of undeveloped land in a semi -rural setting. R. L. Davis Elementary School lies across the street from the applicant's. Commercial uses across from a school on a street may cause traffic conflicts from both the loading and unloading of school students and the commercial traffic throughout the day. The undeveloped tract of land on the southwest corner of the intersection provides for future development of commercial areas. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Meyer Lane Neighborhood Association, Otter Creek Homeowners Association, Quail Run Neighborhood Association, and Rolling Pines Neighborhood Association. Staff has received 17 comments from area residents. None are in support and 17 are opposed to the change. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes the change is premature and therefore not appropriate. The area shown as Commercial on the southwest corner of the Vimy Ridge / County Line Road intersection provides an area for future Commercial uses. This area will be reviewed in a year or so as part of the Chicot West I-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan review. 3 August 3, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: FILE NO.: LU00-16-03 (MARCH 2, 2000) Brian Minyard, of Staff, presented the item to the Commission. Doug Loftin, the applicant, stated that the property was improperly zoned R-2 residential instead of multi -family. The applicant would prefer a commercial zoning, but if denied, would want a multi -family zoning. Mr. Loftin gave a description of his proposed development. Joe Longinotti spoke in opposition to the item. Mr. Longinotti opposed the development of either commercial property or a day care center, next to his property. Donna Jones spoke in opposition to the item. Ms. Jones expressed concern that a the proposed development would flood her property and complained that the gas station on the corner of Vimy Ridge and County Line Road caused flooding on her property. Michelle Ready spoke in opposition to the item. Ms. Ready stated that development of the applicant's property would cause drainage problems and added concerns about noise form a daycare facility. Ms. Ready closed by adding a concern about the potential for increased traffic in the area. Chair Pam Adcock asked if several options could work to develop the property without a land use plan change to commercial. The applicant expressed an interest in construction of either a day care center or development of residential units. Winston Simpson, Superintendent of Bryant School District, spoke in opposition to the item. Mr. Simpson expressed concerns about the safety of children attending, and walking to Davis Elementary School. Mr. Simpson stated that he did not oppose development of a day care on the property, but opposed commercial development on the property. Mack Blann spoke in opposition to the item. Mr. Blann stated that any development would hurt the property values of area residents and added that he would prefer that the 4 August 3, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU00-16-03 property in question would be developed for residential purposes. The speaker closed his remarks with concerns about drainage. Doug Loftin requested a deferral on the item. Mr. Loftin wanted time to arrive at a consensus with the area property owners on the issue of how to best develop the property in question. Commissioner Mizan's expressed thanks for participation and comments made by a representative of the Bryant School District in the meeting. Commissioner Hawn requested that the Public Works Department study the drainage issue in the vicinity of the property discussed in this item. Commissioner Downing expressed concern about improperly zoning of the property in question made by Mr. Loftin. Mr. Lawson, city staff, stated that the property in question is zoned R-2 Single Family, but if a mistake was made, city staff would request that the Board of Directors change the zoning of the property back to the original zoning. A motion was made to defer the item to the April 13 meeting and was approved with a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 13, 2000) This item was placed on the consent agenda for deferral to the June 22, 2000 meeting to coincide with a Planned Development application. A motion was made to accept the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant on May 25, 2000 requested a deferral to the August 3, 2000 planning commission hearing. This is their third deferral for this item. The applicant states that "We will also be filing a PZD application for the same 5 August 3, 2000 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU00-16-03 property prior to June 26. By deferring item LU00-16-03, the commission can review both items for this property on the same agenda." PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 22, 2000) This item was placed on the consent agenda for deferral to the August 3, 2000 meeting. A motion was made to accept the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant on July 18, 2000 requested that this item be withdrawn without prejudice. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2000) The item was placed on the consent agenda for withdrawal. A motion was made to approve the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent. 6