HomeMy WebLinkAboutemail on change on pride valley 13-02-10Malone, Walter
From: Malone, Walter
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:17 AM
To: 'Aaron Glazier'
Subject: RE: Proposed zoning change - Case LU13-02-10
With this email you have voiced your preference.
However, the issue does involve your subdivision and the map is correct. The Land Use Plan shows your property for
Public Institutional use (churches, schools etc.). We believe the intended location was the school south of your
subdivision. Your zoning is PDR (Planned District Residential) and the subdivision is developed as single-family
homes. The change to the Land Use plan from PI to RL is intended to bring the City Land Use Plan into conformance with
what is really there and how the land is zoned.
The Land Use Plan is a document the City uses when property owners such as yourself come to the City and ask for a
rezoning. If you believe your subdivision should be shown as single family and should continue to be single-family
homes then you would support the change to Residential Low Density from Public Institutional.
Currently we are in an informational phase only on this proposed change along with many others. If the City processes
you will receive a second notice with the time and location of a public hearing where the Planning Commission will vote
on the package of changes for your general area (this being only one for those changes).
If you have any additional question feel free to contact me again.
Walter Malone, AICP
Planning Manager
From: Aaron Glazier[mailto:aaron.glazier(Pcimail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:01 AM
To: Malone, Walter; Rebecca Anne Glazier
Subject: Proposed zoning change - Case LU13-02-10
Hi Walter,
I recently received a notice that the proposed land between Kanis and Pride Valley Road is subject to re-
zoning. I believe the map that was included in the letter is erroneous, as it seems to point directly to our home,
not to area proposed for re -zoning.
Regardless, I was hoping to know if there will be a public hearing regarding this proposed re -zoning. My
family would like the land to remain zoned as "Public Institutional" as opposed to the proposed change to
"Residential Low Density." What can we do to voice our preference?
Sincerely,
Aaron and Rebecca Glazier