HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes staff updatesNovember 10, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 Cont.) FILE NO.: LU05-18-02
of the lost potential residential units from changes in the 1990s, while leaving
abundant undeveloped areas of office type uses in the general vicinity.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Brodie Creek,
John Barrow, and Sandpiper. Staff has received one neutral comment from an
area resident. None of the Neighborhood Associations contact have indicated a
position to the City on the change.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is appropriate.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 10, 2005)
The applicant requested the item be deferred to January 5, 2006 prior to the
meeting. The Commission placed this item on the consent agenda for deferral.
By a vote of 9 for, 0 against, and 2 absent the consent agenda was approved.
5
January 5, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.. C_ CCont.) _ _ _ __ FILE NO.: LU05-18-02
of the lost potential residential units from changes in the 1990s, while leaving
abundant undeveloped areas of office type uses in the general vicinity.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Brodie Creek,
John Barrow, and Sandpiper. Staff has received one neutral comment from an
area resident. None of the Neighborhood Associations contact have indicated a
position to the City on the change.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is appropriate.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(NOVEMBER 10, 2005)
The applicant requested the item be deferred to January 5, 2006 prior to the
meeting. The Commission placed this item on the consent agenda for deferral.
By a vote of 9 for, 0 against, and 2 absent the consent agenda was approved.
STAFF UPDATE:
There has been on contact from the applicant. No new information on this item,
Staff recommendation remains the same.
R
January 5, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: C
FILE NO.: LU05-18-02
of the lost potential residential units from changes in the 1990s, while leaving
abundant undeveloped areas of office type uses in the general vicinity.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Brodie Creek,
John Barrow, and Sandpiper. Staff has received one neutral comment from an
area resident. None of the Neighborhood Associations contact have indicated a
position to the City on the change.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is appropriate.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(NOVEMBER 10, 2005)
The applicant requested the item be deferred to January 5, 2006 prior to the
meeting. The Commission placed this item on the consent agenda for deferral.
By a vote of 9 for, 0 against, and 2 absent the consent agenda was approved.
STAFF UPDATE:
There has been on contact from the applicant. No new information on this item,
Staff recommendation remains the same.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(JANUARY 5, 2006)
The item was placed on consent agenda for deferral. By a vote of 11 for,
0 against the consent agenda was approved.
5
February 16, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: C Cont.) FILE NO.: LU05-18-02
of the lost potential residential units from changes in the 1990s, while leaving
abundant undeveloped areas of office type uses in the general vicinity.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Brodie Creek,
John Barrow, and Sandpiper. Staff has received one neutral comment from an
area resident. None of the Neighborhood Associations contact have indicated a
position to the City on the change.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is appropriate.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIO
(NOVEMBER 10, 2005)
The applicant requested the item be deferred to January 5, 2006 prior to the
meeting. The Commission placed this item on the consent agenda for deferral.
By a vote of 9 for, 0 against, and 2 absent the consent agenda was approved.
STAFF UPDATE:
There has been on contact from the applicant. No new information on this item,
Staff recommendation remains the same.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(JANUARY 5, 2006)
The item was placed on consent agenda for deferral. By a vote of 11 for,
0 against the consent agenda was approved.
STAFF UPDATE:
The applicant has not contact staff as required. Therefore, Staff recommends
this item be withdrawn with out prejudice at this time.
5