HomeMy WebLinkAboutemails and letters receivedLetters, emails and petitions
for Items 8 (Z-7880) and 8.1
(LU05-19-02) — 6, 12, 14,
and 17 Norton Road.
EDWARD T. OGLESBY, P.A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
EDWARD T. OGLESBY*
100 MORGAN KEEGAN, SUITE 110
LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202
Email: edward,@ozlesbylaw.net
Telephone (501) 664-1000
Facsimile (501) 664-1012
July 12, 2005
City of Little Rock
Department of Planning and Development
City Planning Commission
723 West Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
Re: Case: LU -05-1902
Request for Rezoning from Single Family to Commercial
To Whom It May Concern:
* Also Admitted
In Louisiana
write to advise that, as both a citizen of Little Rock and a resident of the neighborhood
abutting the land proposed to be rezoned, I vehemently object to the same.
My objections are multifold. First, the owners of the land cannot be heard to complain that
they are somehow being deprived of any right to develop their property as the subject property has
been zoned single family for a great length of time and many owners, including the members of my
neighborhood and its Property Owners Association, have built single family residences and/or
purchased the same in reliance upon the surrounding neighborhood area. Additionally, ingress and
egress to the subject property via Cantrell Road will only increase an already high traffic count and
will further be via a route uncontrolled by stop light. Moreover, the owners the property cannot
show that there is not other available property previously zoned commercial which is available for
development.
In visiting with our neighborhood residents, which are comprised of 199 households, I have
yet to find one household in support of this proposed rezoning.
I respectfully request that the rezoning application be denied.
.ECEIVED
JUL 14 005
BY:
ETO/cp
Sincerely,
Edward T. Oglesby
Attorney at Law
July 13, 2005
City of Little Rock
Department of Planning and Development
Planning Zoning and Subdivision
723 West Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
Re: Case Number LU05-19-02
Dear Planning Commission,
We are neighbors that are directly boarding the area (6, 12, 14 and 17 Norton
Road) that is requesting the C-3 rezone from Residential (R-2). We are not going to be
here for the hearing on the 21St of July and we want to express our opposition to this
change.
First this area (between the Ranch and Wal-Mart) is in the planning commission's vision
to be residential only.
Second, our neighborhood and adjacent neighborhood are also apposed to this
development as it would bring more noise to this quiet area and more traffic.
Third, there are areas that are already zoned C-3 in the area before (In Ranch) and after
(Corner area of Chenal and Hwy 10) that have not been developed.
Fourth, there are developments that are already complete that still sit empty with no
tenants (e.g. Belle Rosa Commerce Center).
Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration when making your decision. We
continue to express our opinion against any further changes in this area to bring in more
commercial development. This area should remain single family dwelling (R-2).
Mike and Jenny Cogan
23 Maywood Drive
Little Rock, AR 72223
Page 1 of 1
Moore, Monte
From: Alicia Finch [finch. a licia@comcast. net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:55 PM
To: Moore, Monte
Cc: Janet; Carol Bulloch; Susan Billingsley
Subject: Rezoning at Hwy 10 and Norton Road
Dear Mr. Moore,
As the president of the Maywood Manor Neighborhood Association I am expressing the neighborhood's concern
over the zoning change request for the property on Norton Road. This property backs up to our neighborhood
along Maywood Drive. We are against any commercial zoning in this area beyond what is currently present.
There are several commercial centers east of the Ranch that have been developed or are currently being
developed. Those that have been completed still sit empty with no tenants (i.e Bella Rosa Commerce Center),
Do we need more of the same?
It is my understanding the planning commission's vision for the area between the Ranch and Wal Mart does not
recommend commercial development. Our neighborhood is a very quiet and peaceful residential area and we
would not want this to be disrupted by commercial development such as a big box store. The Hwy 10 Plan does
not include commercial development in this area. We, as a neighborhood, would strongly encourage the planning
commission to stay with the plan as designed and refrain from further changes.
Our neighborhood is also opposed to the zoning change request at the west entrance of Little Rock Christian
Academy. This is already on record, or should be. We know this issue was deferred to July 7 due to staff
opposition. Again our neighborhood would urge the planning commission to remain with the plan as currently
proposed -no commercial zoning.
As residents in this area we greatly appreciate your consideration of our concerns for future development of this
area. We have observed, been actively opposed and have grudgingly accepted the changes that have occurred
in our area. We will continue to monitor and express our concerns. We hope they will be heard.
Sincerely,
Alicia Finch
President
Maywood Manor Neighborhood Association
7/13/2005
Janet & Greg Floyd
I C5 Ab .r••i+: en t't~'z
i,R 722L"
July 7, 2005
City Planning Commission
City of Little Rock
Department of Planning & Development
723 W. Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
To the members of the Planning Commission:
As residents of the Aberdeen Court Subdivision we are deeply concerned about
the proposed rezoning of 11.7 acres on the south side of Cantrell Road at
Norton Road (Case No. LU05-19-02) from single family to commercial. This
property abuts the Aberdeen Court neighborhood and rezoning to commercial
will adversely affect property values and quality of life for the residents. This is a
quiet residential area with little crime. By allowing commercial property directly
behind homes, noise and traffic levels will increase as well as the possibility of
increased crime.
We are also concerned about the amount and types of development taking
place all along Cantrell Road west of the 1-430 interchange. Is there no plan to
avoid turning Cantrell into another Rodney Parham? This has always been a
beautiful, serene, scenic stretch of land and it is becoming nothing more than
one long stretch of businesses and traffic lights. Please do not add to the
clutter that is already there by rezoning more single family property to
commercial. We ask that you oppose Case number LU05-19-02.
Sincerely,
Janet Floyd
Y
reg Floyd 4 � �t/
RECEIVED
JUL 112005
$Y:
C����,�.o�i�, G� f✓10, � T" ?ooh'
RECEIVED
JUL 112005
BY:
JUL-11-2005 10:088 FROM:
r Pagel
July 11, 2005
723 W. Markham
Little Rook, AR 72201
Dear Little Rock On Planning Commission and Staff Members,
o: s J,54SD r: s
July 11, 2005
We are wiling regarding the rezoning application to change numbers 6.12.14 and 17 Norton Road in
West Little Rock from a residential (R-2) zone to a commercial (C-3) zone. This is case # LU06-19.02
It is understandable that the four families on Norton Road are requesting the C-3 classification. They
would stand to reap a tremendous prafrt upon selling to a Mr Laha, who as I understand it initially
planned to develop only along Cantrell Road until approached by these four families. However, the
entirety of these properties extends south quip® deeply off of Cantrell Road and comes in direct contact
with the Aberdeen subdivision In Chanel and the Maywood subdivision to the west If allowed to
become C-3 property, many in these two neighborhoods wouki be adversely affected by having
businesses literally at their back doors. Consftctlon, noise, harsh security lighting, heavy traft and
visual blight would ensue, More Importantly, a loss in property value would occur, not only for those
directly behind or beside the proposed area, but for all other residents of Aberdeen and Maywood as
wail.
In addition, there are many conditions sued in Sections 36-01 and 36-452 of the Planning
Commission's Code and Regulations that the property on Norton Road does not and can never meet.
1. " It is the intent of this article that application for a PD commercial not be granted for the sole
benefit of the applicant' Obviously, granting this petition would greatly benefit the applicants
and be extremely detrimental to hundreds of homeowners in Chanel and Maywood.
2. A PD commercial development should be "harmonious with the character of the
neighborhood'. An office, restaurv% or a tire store Is not going to be in harmony with the
residenoes that could surround it on three sides.
3. A PD commercial should "not have a negative impact upon the future development of the
area". Allowing the area along Norton Road to become C-3 would be a forerunner for the
destruction of many neighborhoods in West Little Rock designed to be $tingle -Family
Residential.
4. PD Commercial requires'maximum enhancement and minimal disruption of existing natural
features and amenities". Having businesses at our back doors would enhance nothing in
Aberdeen or in Maywood. Almost all the natural woodlands around Aberdeen and Maywood
would be destroyed, as would one of our greatest amenities, the privacy we all paid for when
we purchased our homes here. There can be nojustifimbon for allowing commercial
development not outlined in the current Land Use Plan to encroach on existing single family
zoned areas.
S. The Commission wants" to encourage office development which is consistent with the long
range comprehensive plan of the city`. I iaON spoken with one of the Commission members I
was told this rezoning application woulci appear to be inconsistent with future plans, especially
in West Little Rock.
JUL-11-2005 10:09A FROM:
TO:3993435 P:313
The Commission desires' to encourage the clustering of commercial and office activttles
within areas spwaifcally designated m a=m suun uses and to aiscourage the
pmlbferallon ofcommercleI uses along major thorougMares and non-commercial a as". The
Norton Road properties a:a surrounded by residences. it is inconceivable that businesses
shouid be plopprrd dawn in the middle d them.
We know this letter is a tittle longwinded. However, we sincerely hope that you have read It Intently,
even imagining yourself in such a predicament where your home. family. pets and especlaty peace of
mW and property Investments are threatened. We also hope you can see this rezoning request Is
Intended sorely for personal profit and not for the improverri6nl of the C ity of Little Ruck, We pray your
thoughtful odnsideration of this issue will convince you to vote against rezoning Norton Road as a
commercial property of any kind at any time in the fm re.
Sincerely,
plc" . D --
Anne Magee and Delane Left
Aberdeen Court Residents
RECEIVE]
JUL 112005
BY: X., 4!�`--�
2— P er-a--
JUL-12-2UCIE, i'7: 15 WKHNSHI-+ U I ULHK•rNIiULUUY Nd 1 t -t r '. at6jts r. Uz. Ue
ARKANSAS OTOLARYNGOLOGY CENTER, P.A.
10201 Kanim Road
1.lttlr Rock, Arkalnsas722138.6203
Phonr. 501 -22? -MO Fax: 601.227-5161
IJBH ROdk fi - 50 S. fwva+elt} NOO LMLO pwk - 4761 ra],V .9kned
. C Ban - 3 IL"dirA; I -k DMU mmonYEl! -1420 Braden Cow-2"Wfaw-1 Dr.
WxIWalpfd6 SdFue Mad. Cia'lai Cm Won-- O+10C.'d% M & O"kir HEOtl: SpJ22 - . VIO. Go," 8 rri - 73107 W Wonen- Bract Cu. h16M CVnW
To: Monte Moore
Little Rock Plarming Cormnission
From: Edward " Ward" Gardner and Nancy Gardner
37 Aberdeen Drive
Little Rock, AR 72223
Re: Planned Roxoaing of Norton Rd.
Meeting Date July 21", 2005
To whom it may concern,
Please consider receipt of this letter as reconfinnatiori of all objections already
outlined by the Aberdeen Property Ownere Association. time concur with the opinion that
the plaimed rezoning project appears not to be in accordance with the existing land use
plan in wast Little Rock, that k is unnecessary expansion, and that this rezoning will
degrade Little Rock both acutely and chronically. Thank you for time and ccmzmitmem to
the betterment of our city.
Sincerely,
Edward k, Gardner
cv +t .
� , &40-
4y B. Gar
1h1 tlaewrwnl QWWnsrmAWa V wio�e Vial IS ts,ri,}ypr.AeW and a�hlch Is rrlatled br the um of Ne addrRrtle.:' ybu artndl UW IrAww4d Mp.wL. yararr ntf v nolined IAe: NWOKIDWM. e.>,rr+n0.
w.�,..mi..,�..n.....n1.Ms.Hlrw a,ru anrritlFxlACaY IanNNlatl Y van hwa w*WO INS doclmla 40 OrM, pWarally ara SVnp!• Yn•TrANt1dy tp prtnge larfvh at MIA aoV~.
TIITRL P.02
July 10, 2005
Mizan Rahman, Chair
1510 S. Broadway
Little Rock, AR 72204
RE: CASE NUMBER LU05 19-02
Dear Mr. Rahman:
We are a concerned property owner living at 43 Aberdeen Dr, Little
Rock, AR. Two weeks ago we received a certified letter from Mr. Troy
Laha as a notice of a public hearing before the Little Rock Planning
Commission on a request for use change or development of land.
We have lived at this the property for 10 years and are most concerned
regarding the request to rezone the property located directly behind
our house to C 3.
Our concern is two fold. Is this request for rezoning because more
commercial property is needed on Cantrell Road or is this just an
opportunity for the "property sellers" to take advantage of increased
property values if it is rezoned commercial?
It is our opinion that more families will be affected in a negative
evaluation of their property as well as way of life.
We ask you to consider the negative impact on our neighborhood
versus the few people who will benefit from this rezoning.
We trust that you will do the right thing.
Best Regards,
Michael R. & Paula L. Allen /4
CAROLINE BEAUCHAMP JONES
24 ROSAIRES WAY
LITTLE ROCK, AR 72223
July 12, 2005
City of Little Rock
Department of Planning and Development
City Planning Commission
723 W. Markham St.
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Case No. LU05-19-02
Norton Road project
To Whom It May Concern:
PLEASE do not change the zoning of this land from Single
Family to Commercial.
object to this change for the following reasons:
de t ucti n of-1hg of-1htrees and other ngltural habits backing
up to our homes and our subdivision
excassiye_noise created by commercial property
uns gbtly view of Ahis cornmercl a I or nerty FROM MY
HOME AND -IMY SUBDIVISIO
increased sec b ems
excessive_ [lab created by commercial property
excessive traffic created by commercial property
unneeded and unsiahtiv commercial propertv in our
residential area
1 live in Aberdeen subdivision and have for ten (10) years.
moved here with the expectation of never moving again. I
selected my subdivision because it is quiet and nestled in a
warm, natural looking RESIDENTIAL area.
PLEASE DO NOT DO ANYTHING TO CHANGE OUR
SUBDIVISION. We are good neighbors. We care about our
neighbors. We care about our homes - they are not just houses.
Thank you for continuing to give us the right to have our
neighbor.
Very oncerned resident,
Caroline Beaucha p
Aberdeen Resident
Gary Cooper
64 Aberdeen Drive
Little Rock, AR 72223
To: Planning Commission/LR City Board
From: Gary Cooper
Date: July 11, 2005
RF-: Highway 10 rezoning
The proposed rezoning of the residential property on Highway 10 that adjoins the
Aberdeen neighborhood is going to create irreparable harm to our neighborhood. As an
Aberdeen resident, I value the security and peacefulness that a neighborhood such as ours
enjoys. We have worked hard to preserve the beauty and safety of our homes. If a
commercial development is allowed to go in this area, it is going to do several things:
1. Make the sellers rich — which I don't mind but not at the expense of 200 other
homes.
2. Demolish a buffer between our neighborhood and the commercial developments
on Highway 10.
3. Decrease our property values because the,attractive characteristics that our
neighborhood offers will now be gone.
4. Significantly increase the noise level that on Aberdeen drive.
My family and I are not opposed to developments out west as long as they are well
planned keeping the residents in mind first. We would appreciate the board not allowing
Ns rezoning so close to our home.
f
rY'Y �`Y
July 11, 2005
Mr. Robert Stebbins
28 Sherrill Heights
Little Rock, AR 72202
Subject: Opposition to Case No. LU05-19-02
Rezoning of 6, 12, 14, & 17
Norton Road from R-2 to C-3. (Z-7880)
Dear Mr. Stebbins
When my husband and I bought our house at #35 Aberdeen Drive
last year., we did so•only after checking to be sure that the
property adjoining our neighborhood was zoned residential. We
had searched for months for just the right house that backed up
to trees, insuring privacy and preacefulness. Now, a mere 15
months later, that "way of life" is threatened by this proposal
to rezone.
We humbly ask that you oppose this move to add even more
commercialization to our area.
Sincerely,
Retha Lamb
July 11, 2005
Commissioners & Staff
Little Rock City Planning Commission
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Ar 72201
Dear Commissioners & Staff:
I write to you with a heavy heart My husband Charles died just a few weeks ago. He had been on the
Board of Directors of Aberdeen for many years and loved this small neighborhood. One of his greatest
fears was that the City would allow commercial development to encroach on and destroy Aberdeen, the
spot we chose for our retirement home.
Our home is across the street from property which abuts the North edge of Aberdeen Court I join with my
neighbors in protesting any attempt to place commercial development where it has a negative impact on
our homes.
Please consider whether we truly need additional commercial zoning in this area before you vote. I, for
one, will never darken the doors" of most of those businesses that are invading our area. How many
banks, offices, and restaurants do we need?
Yours Truly,
Eva Dixon
33 Chatel
Little Rock, Arkansas 72223
July 1 1, 2005
Little Rock Planning & Development Commission
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Ar 72201
Re: Your File No. Z-7880 and LU 05-19-02
Dear Staff & Commissioners:
1 write with regard to request to amend the land use plan and to re -zone
1 1.7 acres from single family (R-2) to (C-3) General Commercial District on
the south side of Cantrell Road at 6, 12, 14 and 17 Norton Road by four
property owners.
I live in the neighborhood just south of and adjoining the proposed re -zoning
and want you to know that our whole neighborhood is very upset over the
application. if this passes, four people will be ruining the quality of life for
many in our neighborhood. Many of us have lived too close to businesses
in the past and know that they cause noise, increased crime, and bad odors
just to mention a few of the problems. When we bought here, we thought
those problems were behind us.
Every day we have more and more traffic in the area and more office
buildings and strip shopping centers going in. We see bank after bank
when we drive down Highway Ten. We simply do not need any more
businesses in this area.
Please consider that we are at certain times in bumper -to -bumper traffic out
here. What will it be like when all of the empty buildings are filled?
Sincerely yours,
Birgul & Ibrahim Duy r'
74 Aberdeen Drive
July 10, 2005
Commissioners & Staff
Little Rock City Planning Commission
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Ar 72201
Dear Commissioners & Staff:
Fiveyears ago, my family moved to Aberdeen Court from a "nice" area, the upper Heights, where we
were in the midst of "high" traffic volume on Kavanaugh, and Cantrell, the high noise level from that
traffic, odors from local restaurants, lights from businesses along Kavanaugh, and constant traffic
accidents, etc., with the attendant sirens. Crime from the robberies of the businesses and purse
snatchings, etc. were occurring.
We thought a long time before we left the Heights, where we had many friends and wonderful
neighbors, but the atmosphere created by the businesses made life there increasingly unpleasant. We
invested in property in Aberdeen and kept our home in the Heights for over ayear because we wanted
to be sure that we would be happy here before we gave it up.
We had the impression that development plans for this area established a commercial development plan
which maintained a good Quality of life in the residential areas.
In the past fiveyears, we have seen traffic lights and traffic levels doubled, noise levels increased, litter
increased, roads deteriorating, and an unbelievable level of commercial development. It is now literally
knocking on Aberdeen Courts' door.
We look toyou, the Planning Commission to protect the Quality of life in our family oriented
neighborhood where we are fortunate to have many young children. Therefore, we reQuest thatyou
deny the zoning reQuest to make the Norton Road area commercial.
If the commercial businesses are allowed to overrun our neighborhoods, I suppose, we can always
relocate, so that in five or tenyears, the businesses can vacate this area and come running after us
again.
Sincerelyyours
Wil and Ian Rauch
14 Aberdeen Drive
Little Rock, Arkansas 72223
Little Rock Planning Commission
Siva Soora Family
Planning and Development Department
45 Aberdeen Drive
723 W Markham Street, Little Rock
Little Rock,
Arkansas 72201
Arkansas 72223
Date: July 11, 2005
Subject: Objection to Conversion from R-2 to C-3 (Z-7880), File Number LU 05-19-02
Dear Sir/Madam,
My family and I have resided at 45 Aberdeen Drive since May 1994. We moved to
Aberdeen Drive for several reasons, the primary being serenity, the greenery and the
wonderful wooded lots behind our house and the lack of any commercial development
adjacent to our residence. We have enjoyed the peace and tranquility over the years with
friendly neighbors and it has been wonderful to reside in Aberdeen.
Our decision to move to this area was entirely due to the fact that we could get away from
the hustle and bustle of everyday life and be surrounded by nature. This very reason that
we moved for is now being challenged. Chenal properties told us that all of the
surrounding houses were single family dwelling and that there was no chance of any
commercial real estate ventures near our house. At that time, we reviewed Chenal
properties overall plan and accepted the commercial development proposed by them as it
was not anywhere close to where we lived.
The new zoning request by Debusk, Elridge, Allen and McFatrich (File #LU 05-19-02)
from residential R-2 to C-3 commercial is going to infringe our very basis of living, the
serenity and tranquility in this neighborhood. Not knowing what commercial enterprise
will be located in our midst, we object very strongly to this re -zoning request. The noise
level will increase, along with the traffic and our privacy will definitely be violated. We
are afraid of security lights, odors (if it were a restaurant) or other vandals who might be
much closer than we desire.
There are several commercial properties already available on Cantrell Road we feel that it
is not necessary for re -zoning to a Commercial venture 25 feet from our residence and
our neighborhood. To put this in perspective, this distance is less than that from my front
door to my back door in my own house. We are also worried that the property values in
this are will be lowered. Our house is one of the single largest investments we have made.
We do not wish to suffer financial damage along with our neighbors.
Our carni! y req uests the commission that this re-zonin be denied.
With R ards,
}�Nl
Siva Soora Family
ECEIVED
JUL - 7 2005
[R,
YA
July 7, 2005
Item No. File no. LT 05-19-02
Name: Land Use Plan Amendment
Location: South side of Cantrell Road at 6, 12, 14 and 17 Norton Road
Request: Single Family (R-2) to (C-3) General Commercial District (Z-7880)
Source: Troy Laha
Owners: Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families
OBJECTION
Aberdeen Court Property Owners' Association, Inc., a Chenal Neighborhood, lying South of
Cantrell Road, North of the Chenal Parkway and West of Chenonceau between Chenonceau and
the convergence of The Parkway and Cantrell Road, represents the 198 homeowners in Aberdeen
Court.
On behalf of the Aberdeen Court residents, the Aberdeen POA objects to the proposed captioned
request and states:
1. The Aberdeen Court Neighborhood has six lots which abut the applicants' property
and which would be profoundly affected by the change in zoning from single family to
commercial.
2. There are another twenty homes in Aberdeen Court which would be seriously affected
by the visibility of, the noise, and odors attendant to many commercial establishments.
Additionally there are homes in the adjoining subdivision, Maywood Manor, which will suffer
greatly were this application to be approved.
3. The property values of all residents would be diminished proportionately as those of
the residents who lived in close proximity to the proposed commercial establishment were
diminished.
4. There is no need for additional commercial property in the general area since a large
amount of commercial property in the immediate vicinity is zoned for commercial development
and is awaiting development.
5. To allow the rezoning of the captioned property would require that the Commission
totally ignore its own previously approved policy of allowing commercial development only at
arterial nodes. The property sought to be rezoned borders two residential neighborhoods; namely,
Maywood Manor and Aberdeen Court and is not part of an arterial node.
6. There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical times
of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
7. Protestant reserves the right to expand and voice additional concerns and objections, as
it explores the possible ramifications of this proposed change in zoning.
8. For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the best interests
of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock.
Therefore, the Aberdeen Court Property Owners' Association, Inc., respectfully requests that this
Commission vote to deny this application.
By: �ZL
Wil Rauch, President
Aberdeen Court Property Owners' Association, Inc.
P. O. Box 241992
Little Rock, AR 7 223
n �.
By: LJ
Jai ern
Argo, Se et.
A rdeen Court Propert Owners' Association, Inc.
P Box 241992
LiWt e Rock, Ar 72223
501-868-5533
July 10, 2005
Item No. File No. Z-7884 and LU05-19-02
Name: Amend Land Use Plan
Location South side of Cantrell Road at 6, 12, 14 and 17 Norton Road
Request: To Re -zone 11,1'.7 acres from Single Family (R-2) to (C-3) General
Commercial District (Z-7880)
Source: Troy Laha
Owners: Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families
PETITION TO DENYAMENDING LAND USE PLAN
AND REZONING
WHEREAS, Aberdeen Court is a Chenal Neighborh9od consisting of 198 homes, lying South of
Cantrell Road, North of the Chenal Parkway and West of Chenonceau between Chenonceau and
the convergence of The Parkway and Cantrell Road;
WHEREAS, The Aberdeen Court Neighborhood has six lots which abut the applicants' property
and which would be profoundly affected by the change in zoning from single family to
commercial;
WHEREAS, There are another twenty homes in Aberdeen Court which would be seriously
affected by the visibility of, the noise, and odors attendant to many commercial establishments.
Additionally there are homes in the adjoining subdivision, Maywood Manor, which will suffer
greatly were this application to be approved;
WHEREAS, The property values of all 198 families would be diminished proportionately as
those of the residents who lived in close proximity to the proposed commercial establishment
were diminished;
WHEREAS, There is no need for additional commercial property in the general area since a large
amount of commercial property in the immediate vicinity is zoned for commercial development
and is awaiting development;
WHEREAS, To allow the re -zoning of the captioned property would require that the
Commission totally ignore its own previously approved policy of allowing commercial
development only at arterial nodes. The property sought to be re -zoned borders two residential
neighborhoods; namely, Maywood Manor and Aberdeen Court and is not part of an arterial node.
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
` ":/, V,! l- "; , "Ti il , i ? '
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME ADDRESS
ct
J
-7 zzZ3
L �,;�
ze��-6
219-F
72zz 3
z Z-
lZ3
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties -
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
ADDRESS
Lle4
D L xA
1 ,(-z �
I A An a ,.. ( INA
C-;
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
ADDRESS
1)/4R- Id !# Civ v.- —7
Ct
WITEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
Mz
ADDRESS
1 Ir-1�
�lOi7,l tje* W,4
Y
Y7 LA k .A' t 4 .. to 1 I� nn. I f
Ll
L�
N
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
ADDRESS
jvq�j L ((9-1/ CA L�(t, 7Z 2,z S
&-�TE 0-�� V -�2 e Oe4,7,r, /- �J/, -?,3
C zd rql (4 D z 44( - 0,4- 2
C'� Z4 .
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by -yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME ADDRESS
Q'
0.1Y ew k A-, �Q iib J �
WI-fEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
ADDRESS
NAME
5A
r
,�b
deem 0 r'
ADDRESS
�4zl-
7z z 1
I• p
L2 72223
�, 2 L)
• I.
-7222-3
NAME
ADDRESS
K .7 zZ2-3
.
Qf, A2 7 L22 j
0
NAME ADDRESS
� `' � � � •L�}-ems. L� �
NAME
ADDRESS
C-4
July 10, 2005
Item No.
Name:
Location
Request
Source:
Owners
File No. Z-788
Amend Land Use Plan
South side of Cantrell Road at 6, 12, 14 and 17 Norton Road
To Re -zone 111.7 acres from Single Family (R-2) to (C-3) General
Commercial District (Z-7880)
Troy Laha
Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families
-19-02
PETITION TO DENY AMENDING LAND USE PLAN
AND REZ�NII VG
WHEREAS, Aberdeen Court is a Chenal Neighborhpod consisting of 198 homes, lying South of
Cantrell Road, North of the Chenal Parkway and West of Chenonceau between Chenonceau and
the convergence of The Parkway and Cantrell Road;
WHEREAS, The Aberdeen Court Neighborhood has six lots which abut the applicants' property
and which would be profoundly affected by the change in zoning from single family to
commercial;
WHEREAS, There are another twenty homes in Aberdeen Court which would be seriously
affected by the visibility oC the noise, and odors attendant to many commercial establishments.
Additionally there are homes in the adjoining subdivision, Maywood Manor, which will suffer
greatly were this application to be approved;
WHEREAS, The property values of all 198 families would be diminished proportionately as
those of the residents who lived in close proximity to the proposed commercial establishment
were diminished;
WHEREAS, There is no need for additional commercial property in the general area since a large
amount of commercial property in the immediate vicinity is zoned for commercial development
and is awaiting development;
WHEREAS, To allow the re -zoning of the captioned property would require that the
Commission totally ignore its own previously approved policy of allowing commercial
development only at arterial nodes. The property sought to be re -zoned borders two residential
neighborhoods; namely, Maywood Manor and Aberdeen Court and is not part of an arterial node.
WHEREAS, There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical
times of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
NOW THEREFORE, For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the
best interests of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock and the following residents of
the area respectfully Petition this Commission vote to deny applicants' the relief sought..
NAME
-:,I4 S5
0
ADDRESS
5 k 6PU zzz3
ck� r AV
CS 7 z3
V 77.,
-, v
G-�a5•f�A� ' 7e- 2 2_3
rCoS � Y CK,4Y 7 &C,
;2'6' Ra sA.- RES lel! LZ23
LA 7 �
�. /-V- 7z
201 ex r _- 72 Z ?j
7-U-7
J
NAME ADDRESS
r
S 27.� 3
Jeel C.-4 f� a rC z L�
A
c, �a
��
Al �
lzzz
Petition
To: Honorable Members of the Little Rock Planning Commission
From: Maywood Manor Neighborhood Property Owners
Re: Opposition to Rezoning Request:
To rezone 11.7 acres from "R-2" Single Family District to
"C-3" General Commercial District. (Z-7880)
We, the property owners in the subdivision known as Maywood Manor,
respectfully petition the Little Rock Planning Commission to deny the following rezoning
request submitted by Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families:
To rezone 11.7 acres Lrom "R-2"—Single FamilDistrict to
3" General Commercial District. (Z-7880) at 6. I Z 14, and 17 Norton Road
Maywood Manor Petition, Page 2
We, the property owners in the subdivision known as Maywood Manor,
respectfully petition the Little Rock Planning Commission to deny the following rezoning
request submitted by Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families:
To rezone 11.7 acres from "R-2 " Single F'amd y District to
-C-3 " General Commercial District. 0-78801 at G. 12, 14, and 17 Norton Road.
Property Owner's Name (print) Address Signature Date
c,,- rill
a l 71
-3-0 x,411. M0
S
V.
OFS
WAEM
7 , tt -d r -
OWN �IIT�a`1 ' .. ��/, / rig.. J ._ _ _ �� �.I � � M1�Wawhh MINW,
I -T e A) /3`10 o R C- !p ,� �� Q,,�P. wes cl�l
L) Tr,, Tr,, 0 oL t'fQC1Wr 11 tL-0..,
711/ /6 f
r
.aywood Manor Petition, Page 3
We, the property owners in the subdivision known as Maywood Manor,
respectfully petition the Little Rock Planning Commission to deny the following rezoning
request submitted by Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families:
To rezone 11.7 acres gum "R-2" Sin le Famil District to
3" General Commercial District_ (Z-7880) at b, 12, 14, and 17 Norton Road.
Pro eq Owner's Name(print) Address Signature Date
/l e-Iv1 17 T1 1'h-ey YnCx
J
EC::EUVE
JULA 7 ZQD5 .
July 7, 2005
Item No. File no. LU05-19-02
Name: Land Use Plan Amendment
Location: South side of Cantrell Road at 6, 12, 14 and 17 Norton Road
Request: Single Family (R-2) to (C-3) General Commercial District (Z-7880)
Source: Troy Laha
Owners: Debusk, Eldridge, Allen and McFatrich Families
OBJECTION
Aberdeen Court Property Owners' Association, Inc., a Chenal Neighborhood, lying South of
Cantrell Road, North of the Chenal Parkway and West of Chenonceau between Chenonceau and
the convergence of The Parkway and Cantrell Road, represents the 198 homeowners in Aberdeen
Court.
On behalf of the Aberdeen Court residents, the Aberdeen POA objects to the proposed captioned
request and states:
1. The Aberdeen Court Neighborhood has six lots which abut the applicants' property
and which would be profoundly affected by the change in zoning from single family to
commercial.
2. There are another twenty homes in Aberdeen Court which would be seriously affected
by the visibility of, the noise, and odors attendant to many commercial establishments.
Additionally there are homes in the adjoining subdivision, Maywood Manor, which will suffer
greatly were this application to be approved.
3. The property values of all residents would be diminished proportionately as those of
the residents who lived in close proximity to the proposed commercial establishment were
diminished.
4. There is no need for additional commercial property in the general area since a large
amount of commercial property in the immediate vicinity is zoned for commercial development
and is awaiting development.
5. To allow the rezoning of the captioned property would require that the Commission
totally ignore its own previously approved policy of allowing commercial development only at
arterial nodes. The property sought to be rezoned borders two residential neighborhoods; namely,
Maywood Manor and Aberdeen Court and is not part of an arterial node.
6. There is severe traffic congestion in the area on Cantrell Road at certain critical times
of the day which would only be exacerbated by yet additional commercial properties.
7. Protestant reserves the right to expand and voice additional concerns and objections, as
it explores the possible ramifications of this proposed change in zoning.
8. For the foregoing reasons, approval of the application would not be in the best interests
of the residents of the area or the City of Little Rock.
Therefore, the Aberdeen Court Property Owners' Association, Inc., respectfully requests that this
Commission vote to deny this application.
By:
Wil Rauch, President
Aberdeen Court Property Owners' Association, Inc.
P. O. Box 241992
N Little Rock, AR 7 23
By:�
Ja ' ernswirth Argo, Se etary
A rdeen Court Propert Owners' Association, Inc.
P Box 241992
LiWe Rock, Ar 72223
501-868-5533