HomeMy WebLinkAboutLR Port expandsion concepts 2008LITTLE ROCK PORT INDUSTRIAL PARK
EXPANSION CONCEPTS
MARCH, 2008
LITTLE. ROCK,-
PORT
OCK,___.-PORT AUTNORIT
i
LITTLE ROCK PORT INDUSTRIAL PARK
EXP ANSION CONCEPTS
GENERAL
The property encompassed by the current boundary of the Little Rock Port Industrial
Park (Port) has reached total occupancy with only 33 acres remaining. While there is
land available in the Slackwater Harbor, the tracts are small in nature, can only be
leased by Federal constraints, can only be leased to a water transportation user, and
the land has been deemed "Floodway" by FEMA, which imposes severe restrictions
on new construction. Thus, the Port needs to expand its industrial park in order to
have properties to serve additional industries interested in locating close to the barge,
rail, airport, and highway facilities so readily available there.
The proposed expansion of the Port will improve approximately 2,200 acres located
adjacent to and south of the current southern Port property line and west of the
property recently purchased by Welspun. The southern boundary of the study area is
an extension of the south line of the Welspun property for a distance of 1.5 miles,
and a line beginning approximately one half mile south of the previous line and
extending west 1.5 miles to the Fourche Bayou. The westerly line of the study is a
natural boundary - Fourche Bayou. Its gentle, curved shape divides the open, flat
lands in the study area from the higher, hilly terrain to the west. A fully developed
plan of this property showing existing and proposed roadways, Port Railroad
extensions, and utilities is shown on Exhibit B - "Proposed Infrastructure" in this
report.
All of the available lands in this study are adjacent, or nearby, to the Port's Industrial
Park and would be annexed to the City of Little Rock upon purchase.
This report includes the following Exhibits:
A.
General Development Area
B.
Proposed Infrastructure
C.
Environmental Features
D.
Ownership Map
E.
Development Phases
F.
Topographic Map.
Page 1 of 6
2. DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
The development process required by the Little Rock Code begins with a plan for
roadway access to serve tracts of appropriate size and shape owned by the
developer, A "Preliminary Plat" of the entire expansion area is prepared by the
Engineer and is filed with the City Planning Department for review. It shows the
proposed infrastructure, including roads, lot lines, building setbacks, easements,
and utilities. A Master Drainage Plan is also required by Public Works to assure
that adequate outfall routes and detention are provided to protect downstream
neighbors, The Planning Commission then reviews and approves the Preliminary
Plat, which forms the basis for construction of streets under the review and
acceptance of the Public Works Department.
After the physical improvements are constructed and accepted, the Planning Staff
reviews and approves a "Final Plat" and "Bill of Assurance" for the land in the
r� first phase. The land is divided into numbered "Areas" (500, 501, 502, etc) by the
streets shown on the Preliminary and Final Plats. Replats are then prepared on
demand to define the "Tracts" in response to buyer requests.
The development process, therefore, consists of the following steps:
A. Concept Approval Meeting with Planning Staff
B. Purchase of Property
C. Preliminary Plat
D. Subdivision Committee Review
E. Planning Commission Review
F. Construction of Infrastructure
G. Final Plat
H. Sale of Platted Lots.
The Port Authority has maintained essential compliance with the above steps in
the past. In 1969 the existing Industrial Park was created with large initial
purchases of property. After a preliminary design conference and plan review, a
_ Final Plat was approved and filed. Infrastructure construction was allowed to
proceed as income from sales of property and other sources became available.
"Replats" were filed to indicate the property sold to each industry.
The exhibits contained in this study will be sufficient for presentation to the
Planning Staff at a pre -design conference, and this can take place at any time.
J
J
Page 2 of 6
1 A Preliminary Plat will be necessary so that development will continue in an
organized fashion through the generations. The previous practice, however, is
rl that the LRPA files a Final Plat which includes all of the presently acquired
I property, and dedicates rights of way, setbacks, and easements for the area. Land
is sold not by predetermined lots, but by replatting tracts of land according to the
need of the incoming industry. Thus, we have not recommended a series of lot
shapes and sizes, but left this to be defined by potential buyers.
1 This development will require a large investment of funds for property and
infrastructure. A phased development has been indicated, but this phasing is not
1 mandatory as long as growth proceeds in accordance with the approved
Preliminary Plat.
3. ROADWAYS and LOTS
r In general, a plan for minimum road construction has been indicated in this
Report.
Zeuber Road extends from the existing industrial Park into the expansion area and
will be the major east -west roadway serving the proposed development. Zeuber
will be extended to Thibault Road (extended) near the east side of the property.
Since the existing roads began as gravel or `'chip and seal" rural faun roads, they
have traditionally received a minimum of 3 1/2 to 7 inches of asphalt to withstand
industrial traffic loading. Paved shoulders are also necessary to achieve Little
Rock's minimum "Industrial Street" cross section.
The extension of new roadways to the south and west in the study area leads
traffic west of Fourche Bayou along a connection road to State Highway 365
approximately '/ mile outside of the study area. A major drainage structure or
bridge is required to cross .Fourche Bayou. This road is required to serve all the
9 property within Phase A as well as the Phase C area.
The route of the future South Loop has not yet been defined, but an environmental
! evaluation may soon be commissioned by MetroPlan. This will result in a more
definite route for South Loop. The route shown connecting to Fourche Dam
Pike/Thibault Road at the south line of the existing Industrial Park has been
considered in the past by a MetroPlan study as it provides the most efficient
J connection to I-440 through the Port Industrial Park, and also serves Welspun and
other potential industrial sites.
J
J
Page 3 of 6
J
4. RAIL SERVICE
As shown on Exhibit B, rail service from the existing Port property will be
.� extended into the expansion area in the form of three loops which roughly define
I the phases. The location of their common center line follows along a gas
transmission line/Entergy transmission line to avoid additional severance of the
land. The tracks also lie along the edge of environmentally preserved areas or
flood plains. The route along the west in Phase A-1 follows Fourche Bayou. A
loop to the east in Phase B follows the westerly line of the Welspun site, and can
.� provide a connection to a future outbound route desired by Welspun. The Phase
C track lies along the Fourche Bayou on the west, and property lines on the south
and east.
Rail service to industrial sites is generally desirable on the rear or the sides rather
than on the front. The three loops provide this arrangement in most cases.
5. UTILITY SERVICE
A. Water
Central Arkansas Water has a 24 -inch water main entering the west side of
the Park along Frazier Pike with an operating pressure of approximately
75 psi. A 16 -inch water main extends south along Thibault Road from the
1 24 -inch to the southeast corner of the Port property. This 16 -inch line
would be extended into the expansion area south along Thibault Road to
reconnect with the existing system at Frazier Pike, south of the Welspun
property. From this 16 -inch line, a new 16 -inch line will be constructed
west, along the proposed railroad track, to tie in at Dulin Road, and a new
16 -inch line will be extended west along Zeuber Road to loop in with the
Dulin Road extension. This loop will provide the 3000 gallons per minute
fire flow with excellent residual pressures required for the Port area.
North/south extensions off the 16 -inch loop will be made with 12 -inch
water main. The layout of the water mains is shown in Exhibit B.
Substantial storage volume is available for fire flow conditions.
B. Sewer
.1
The water table at this tract is approximately elevation 235 MSL (0 to 10
feet deep) based on geotechnical information collected in the existing
industrial park. Sewering of this tract by gravity collectors is possible, but
is expected to be quite expensive due to the dewatering which will be
J required to install the gravity lines. A sewerage plan using force mains
and grinder pump stations on each site is the more desirable and cost-
effective alternative. Pressure collector lines can be constructed with a
1 standard depth of three feet more economically than gravity collectors
j
Page 4 of 6
J
below the water table. This system type is used to generate the values
shown in the cost estimates.
Little Rock Wastewater (LRW) is currently in design of a new 30 -inch
force main connecting its Arch Street Pump Station to its Fourche
Treatment Facility. This 30 -inch line will run along Zeuber Road and will
be the basis for sewer collection in the proposed Port Industrial Park
expansion area. In order to serve the area, new publicly owned, smaller
diameter force mains will be extended from LRW's proposed 30 -inch line.
These smaller mains will be connected to individual grinder pump stations
on each site. Depending on flow characteristics and hydraulics from the
individual industries, one or more booster pump stations may be required
within the new system, prior to connecting with the 30 -inch force main.
A plan for sewerage based on these premises is shown in Exhibit B of this
report. Final routes and sizing of the new system will naturally be dictated
and driven by the actual size, type, and location of new industries, as they
begin to occupy the Expansion Area,
6. FEMA FLOOD PLAINS
The study area is affected by two very notable environmental features: flood
plains and wetlands. Much of the area lies within the designated FEMA Flood
Plain, and a Flood Plain Development Permit will need to be issued by the City of
Little Rock. There has been no .formal wetlands study done at this time, It is
1 likely that some of the low areas are of marginal wetlands value and these areas
could be filled and become usable sites. In fact, filling of lands below the 100
year flood is very likely to be permitted in this backwater situation. However, the
cost of a formal wetlands study would be substantial. The costs for any filling of
these areas has not been included in this Report,
Revised flood maps and elevations have recently been released by FEMA, and the
matters related to development limitations are currently being dealt with on a
political level throughout Arkansas, These matters will eventually be resolved,
l but until then development can proceed in accordance with existing Flood Plain
- j maps. These extensive Flood Plains are shown in light blue shading on Exhibit C.
All of the Port of Little Rock, and the lands noted in the study area, are protected
by a levee under the jurisdiction of the Fourche Island Levee District. FEMA is
requiring certification of levees. This levee is participating in the Provisional
J Accredited Levee (PAL) program in partnership with FEMA and the US Army
Corps of Engineers. The results of the certification process will not be known for
at least two years. The Fourche Island Levee District has paid the initial $12,000
to participate in the PAL program. Upon receipt of the Corps recommendations
J
Page 5 of 6
J
for certification, the Fourche Island Levee District must work with the Corps to
9 implement these recommendations. These costs are unknown at this time.
] While there is a risk of non -certification, and that risk should be noted, there is a
j high enough level of confidence in the process to proceed.
7. WETLANDS
The Corps of Engineers has indicated that the low lying land and a part of the
farmland may be classified as "wetlands" or "farmed wetlands," but their policy is
not clear at this time. A "Section 404 Permit" will almost certainly be required of
all the areas indicated by swamp symbols on the USGS quadrangle sheets.
I Mitigation (replacement) of such lands will be required in a factor of 2:1, 3:1, or
as much as 4:1. No cost has been assigned to this type of wetland mitigation in
the project cost estimates. The purchase price has not been adjusted for this
reason, either. We have identified these areas as "Preserved Natural Areas" on the
Exhibits.
Naturally occurring woodlands will provide attractive buffers for industrial sites
and existing ponds are to be preserved, and can be made into excellent site
E enhancements. It is estimated that at least 500 acres of the 2,200 acre total are
unbuildable wetlands.
8. PROBABLE COSTS
The estimates of probable cost for the phased expansion are presented in a table
entitled "Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost."
General costs per linear foot (L.F.) for these items are:
Street Construction $450 per L.F.
Road Upgrades $200 per L.F.
Railroad Track $310 per L.F.
16" Water Main $110 per L.F.
6" SS Force Main $65 per L.F.
J
Page 6 of 6
J
w' i ,." .� r - �~ `e'� rr•��,; ��'ITT
i µ:=,
'>, i .LE ROCK NATIONAL AIRPORT
—
.. �'' v • . , %•ur `�i '�e �4•'arT•. f , � "VV �,� ��r � i c�! � r.s :,� �%�' •J.��'-� �_y`�ti.
_ J ' .. .. r .! 1 :al _ I':k • � � yy� ' J'- �L�� 1 t �' .f F � 5 � J
.� .
_TSTAT -_ _ _' �.ti. _ � �, � :`�:��• ��,.:.. -�r
E 4-0a — _ _ �• .: .. •!. . W `r / '� ---.SCALE:
000
O� - fit. r ,•� •�` LINDSEY!' AM I. -i r.. r; 1
_ .:
1k .sl ,LITTLE ROCK PART IPfDUTRIAL PARK
FRAZIER PIKE
COLLEGE . I ~ . [V� SLCJANI= 47RIVE
CITY OF LITTLE. BOCK
STATION
n + r10
FOURCHE
7,. { i
+I
i"V"
- z V_ rc ZEUBER ROAD ; _ _ TREATMEN
TWIBAULT
+ ::::• -PLANT
,
WELSPUN t
INDUSTRIAL PARC EXPANSION r ,
THIBAULTROA
7.7
or -
C_9
W m q
71
ClY lFiad'S` .ry y'r 6; 'i �7 l,ii !► l it v
477
•Jik,
��A
365 '
I
33B II
PROPOSED 601PROVEiBIT'S
PROPOSED PSMST AL PARK EXPANSION
SIVIROVM EXfSTRNQ STREETS/ROADS
NEW rxm7 TIAL STREETS
PORT RAIRDAD TRACKS
—16 so W—
WATER
- — - FM---
Mr SMTARY SEWER FORCE MM BY OTHERS
r SANITARY SEWER FORCE IIIAEIS
110 1000 . 2000 4000
SCALE: 1 ..
N6
�0
be; EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
LITTLE ROCK PORT INDUSTRIAL PARK EXPANSION
8E""ma[Ri%ww
GARVER ENGINEERS
0
_a
0
0
i
�0
a
x
K.
1. .c
L AT O NAL; R7+
A.. a-~ [: s�y.e� _ t .'3v.' •y' - •, .. - •� -syr
IL
9O
COLLEGE-_'�- � � _, �� �
9a STATL7N EXfST.. ��-i'1OLE ROCK q -
�+ �# PSR _ SMAL.,PARK
•.I �•".� - � . �-j4'.1y7� .. [ .t yr [ � � --F E � '+ �,� _, s ..r
• F �� CITY OF LITTLE FLOCK
� r•- Lucas r.. � - � �.. ,a -.. ;; �.
. FRENCH MARKLA JANE M, -
- ' REALTY SAUGUS ENTERGY
• 4 28 ACp
HA IN I, p 60 AC. r 11I �-
;r+' WILLIAM M. ¢ 8grl 6IIRCHE,
r, ac
5oAp f = yTRFATMENT`
C.. 50 ACC.. Col1 14 AC. X PLANT
.. ! 1911Y ...� 177.41
Cl7H•A0
RK
1•:.. - .r. TYLER c i' - (�� - }.•
f �;
RED
JANE ! BUILDERS ' 60 AC.
BAUOU5 5ELZ t
.�-, i
MARK
WILLIAM M. � BS AC. JAMES
�v ea AC.
STI
RS
DOROUGH ------ - 130 AC.
BDAC40 AC. a 35 Ap n"�•uu� 7�r�.� *� - .•r..y4 :. y.
ppppp
f _
1900' d 70 AA� RfCHRRi7 ,• . J �.
,
j
r MARY L. FOURCHE MARY JACK
RATCLIFFE ISLAND, INC TO EY TYLER
�• i i60 AC. ! WILLIAM M. VIRDY 40 AC. 46 AC.
f • DOROUGH 60 AC. FLETCNI R
LIFFE JR. 30 AC. J-_., � ....' �1, 7. � �,Y . {1 1
c 80 AC. 1 _� •• .. IRAIIY 7604 j1CAROLYN •� is 11� 'r� .
r• r 16 AA j THA$AQLT
JANE A1� -
SAURUS JANE WORTHEN BANK OUNAWAY
TRUSTEE MVRA
BAUL7US
Al + 6D AC. 120 AC. 7H[14A
ao AC. OAhIMAWAWAY
80 RC.A.
, 1
. JLBEFLNS{30 r, f[}pCi i.C[I-� �sn
{
a
C.
OWIMEF _ �- SCALE 1 • - 20w
y . HIA i. CtlNNA & MARY L. WILLIAM M. •+ a
RATCLIFFE
RA LIFFE DUPRFEScc
T
16O Ac. CORDi1GH [.
40 AC.
1 (14O
p t,
�0.1f.wh.
. seRti
sa.ea w m
EXHIBIT D
YA
YA11.1
SPfR ,
rj r. 12-6 AC. - - WOWNERSHIP MAP
fM>
n
o�
i�
°a
�I
LL11 I
I
wE LSPUN
1000 2000 3000
2000
EXHIBIT E
DEVELOPMENT PHASES
LITTLE ROCK PORT INDUSTRIAL PARK EXPANSION
0l"EMBER 10, 4007
GARVER ENGINEERS