Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutesAugust 6, 1998 ITEM NO.: 13 FILE NO.: LU98-23--01 Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - Arch Street Planning District Location: Intersection of Arch Street and Dixon Road Request: Single Family and Park/Open Space to Commercial and Single Family to Commercial Source: Staff PROPOSAL / REOUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Arch Street Planning District from Single Family to Commercial on the east side of Arch Street Pike from Old Castle Drive to Dixon Road, Single Family to Park Open Space for a 50' buffer on the east and north side of the previously mentioned commercial area, Park Open Space to Commercial on the east side of Arch Street Pike from Dixon Road south to the gravel drive, Single Family to Commercial on the west side of Arch Street Pike from the intersection of Old Castle south to the Commercial classification at the intersection of Vinson and Arch Street Pike. CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING: Current Land Use shows Single Family in the England Acres subdivision east of Arch Street Pike and north of Dixon Road. To the west, across Arch Street Pike, is a large tract of Industrial that extends south. A node of'Commercial is located on either side of Vinson Road at the intersection of Arch Street Pike. Single Family is to the west of the Commercial and Industrial and extends between the two. On the east side of Arch Street Pike is Park/Open Space. Single Family is north of Dixon Road and Mining is to the south. There is no zoning in this area. RECENT AMENDMENTS: There has not been any recent amendment in this area. This area was last reviewed in the Arch Street Plan of 1988 and again in the Little Rock General Plan of 1989. MASTER STREET PLAN: Arch Street Pike is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and is currently built to a two-lane section with left turn lanes at the intersection of Dixon Road. Dixon Road is shown as a Collector from Arch Street Pike to the proposed east extension of Baseline Road. Ironton Cutoff is shown as a collector. Both Dixon and Ironton Cutoff are two lane roads with open ditches. August 6, 1998 ITEM NO.: 13_ (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU98-23--41 BACKGROUND: A logical place to have Commercial is at the intersection of a Principal Arterial and two collectors as it is at the intersection of minor and principal arterials. At the intersection of Arch Street Pike, Dixon and Ironton Cutoff there is a history of commercial uses. It is logical to place a node of Commercial to recognize the three corners. At Vinson and Arch Street Pike, it is the intent to acknowledge the existing uses by extending the commercial node northerly to recognize the auto repair, grocery, food service, and other uses. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Staff records do not indicate any active neighborhood organizations in this area. Two comments have been received to date: One of a neutral nature and one affected property owner in support of the amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes the changes are appropriate to acknowledge the existing pattern of the area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 6, 1998) Brian Minyard of Staff presented the item. Commissioner Muse asked what was contained in the lower hatched area. Mr. Minyard answered that it was a pizza place, grocery store, sheriff's patrol division office, and auto repair shop. The applicant, Bob McFarland, who is representing the owner, made a statement. He stated that when the subdivision was built in 1973 or 1974, this corner was labeled at that time to be commercial. They propose to put in a strip shopping center with three buildings with multiple occupants. Mr. Ananias Alexander, the President of England Acres, spoke in opposition to the amendment. He produced a map of England Acres and had questions as to where the development actually lies. Discussion followed. The gentlemen from England Acres, Tony Bozynski and the applicant adjourned to the hallway to discuss in detail aspects of the map. Upon returning, Mr. Boyznski, of Staff, clarified the discussion and stated that the concerns about the layout of the land were resolved and issues about sewer were discussed. Mr. Bozynski stated that the subdivision is opposed to the commercial development of the four and one-half acres. 2 August 6, 1998 ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU98-23-01 Mr. Alexander restated that the neighborhood is still opposed to the development. Commissioner Muse asked for a clarification on the extension of Ironton Cutoff. Mr. Minyard and Mr. McFarland explained that it was a right of way line and that the road was not actually there. Commissioner Hawn spoke of concerns about putting commercial that close to a neighborhood. Mr. Lawson explained some of the history of the site. Commissioner Hawn spoke of other options other than commercial. Commissioner Adcock asked about access. Mr. McFarland answered that access would be off of Arch Street and Dixon Road only, not off of Old Castle. He further stated that he had planned a 75' buffer adjacent to Old Castle Drive. Mr. McFarland offered to bring in a site plan for review by the staff. Commissioner Hawn stated that an option would be to zone the 75' buffer Open Space instead of C-3 and that would insure the 75, of buffer. Chairman Lichty explained the concept of the buffer to Mr. Alexander. Chairman Lichty noted that Item 13 has been amended to include a 75, Park/Open Space buffer adjacent to Old Castle Drive. A motion was made by Commissioner Hawn to approve the item as amended to include the PK/OS and opaque fence along Old Castle Drive and the motion was seconded. Motion was approved with a vote of 6 ayes, 2 nays and 3 absent. 3