Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLU00-05-01_BOD Comm.OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION September 19, 2000 AGENDA Subject Action Required Submitted By 4Ordinance Future Land Use Plan Resolution Amendment — Downtown Approval Planning District Information Report Cy Carney City Manager SYNOPSIS An ordinance to change an area of the Future Land Use Plan in the Downtown Planning District from Service Trades District (STD) to Public Institutional (PI) and Parks and Open Space (PK/OS) and Mixed Use (MX). RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommends approval (8 for 0 Against 3 Absent). Planning staff recommends approval. CITIZEN The Capitol View Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plan PARTICIPATION Update Committee discussed options of changes to the Future Land Use Plan. These options were also presented at a Capitol View Stifft's Station Neighborhood Association meeting held on June 12, 2000. Public Hearing August 17, 2000 before the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND As a part of the Capitol View Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plan Update staff presented the committee with several proposed changes to the Future Land Use Plan. After review the committee accepted the staff recommendation to pursue a change for the site of the Cathedral School located adjacent to Cantrell Road, a changed from Service Trades District to Public Institutional and Parks and Open Space, to more accurately reflect the existing use in the area. In addition the committee determined the lands east of this site (an bound by Cantrell Road and North Street) should also be changed from Service Trades District to Mixed Use. For the most part the area is used as residential or office type uses. BACKGROUND Notices were mailed to property owners in the area and one CONTINUED person responded in opposition. The property is currently zoned as office and used as an office type use. With the current zoning and use the property owner is not affected. Should this proposed change be enacted and the property owner desire to redevelop the property he is "losing" the option of a Planned Development with an industrial component. He is however, "gaining" the option of a Planned Development with a commercial component as well as the option for residential. This item was placed on the Planning Commission August 17, 2000 agenda as a Public Hearing item. No one was present at the Public Hearing to speak in opposition of this item. The Planning Commission voted 8 ayes 0 noes and 3 absent for approval of this item on the Consent Agenda.