HomeMy WebLinkAboutLU99-05-01_BOD CommunicationsOFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION
OCTOBER 19, 1999 AGENDA
Subject
Land Use Plan Amendment in
the Downtown and I-30
Districts
RECOMMENDATION
CITIZEN
PARTICIPATION
BACKGROUND
Action Required
gOrdinance
Resolution
Approval
Information Report
'N
Cy Carney
City Manager
Replace existing text with Downtown Framework vision, goals
and objectives, add a new land use classification and modify the
land use map consistent with the Downtown Framework.
Staff recommends approval.
Planning Commission recommends approval (10 for, 0 against).
Citizen committee developed the concepts then held various
meetings around the City in 1997 and 1998. Two mailings to
over 900 property owners were sent (with zoning information)
in May 1999 and August 1999. Public hearing before the
Planning commission September 16, 1999. (Notices sent to
1,004 property owners and organization representatives,)
A citizen committee was formed to review the City's Plans for
Downtown. This committee worked as four subcommittees to
develop general proposals for the future of Downtown in four
geographic areas: Capitol (West), Central Business District
(Office Core), MacArthur (East) and East of I-30. These
groups developed similar concepts; thus one committee was
formed out of the four. From their work the Framework. for the
Future was developed, this document has been presented to the
Commission and recommended.
The Framework of the .Future recommended that the City Land
Use Plan be modified. This item is the first step in that process.
Three changes are requested to bring the Land Use Plan into
line with the recommendations of the Framework for the
Future. First, a new land use category is proposed. This
BACKGROUND
CONTINUED
category is meant to help create a more traditional urban
development form. The exact use is not as important as the
design. Pedestrian friendly design and 24-hour activity are
important elements. A mix of uses is desirable. The new
category would be MXU — "Mixed Use — Urban."
The second change to the Land Use Plan is a complete change of
the plan map for District 5 — Downtown. This is an area from the
Arkansas River south to I-630 and from the Missouri Pacific Rail
Line east to 1-30. (The current classifications date to 1980.) In
this area the new land use classifications would be described
here. The entire district, except those areas described below,
would be shown as the new "MXU" — Mixed Use — Urban
category.
The following areas would be Public Institutional (PI)
State Capitol area — west of Woodlane and south of 3rd
Streets; the Federal Buildings - Capital Avenue to 4th
Street, Arch Street west to State Street, and City/County
Buildings — Broadway/Markham area.
The following areas would be shown as Low Density
Residential (LDR): 6th Street to 9th Street from Ferry to
Cumberland; and 91h to 1-•630 from Commerce to alley
between Scott and Cumberland.
The following areas would be shown as Park/Open
Space (PK/OS): MacArthur Park — 9th Street to 1-630,
McAlmont to Commerce; and Riverfront Park -Arkansas
River to Little Rock and Western Railroad Spur.
In addition, the northern portion of the I-30 District from I-30
to John and Arkansas River to 3rd Street is changed to Public
Institutional from Industrial (the Presidential Library site) and
from ata Street to 9th Street 1-30 to College is changed to Mixed
Use — Urban from Industrial and Transition.
The third change to the Land Use Plan is a complete
replacement of the text for the Downtown District. The new
text is from the Framework of the Future. It is basically the
vision statement, goals/objectives with a verbal description of
the Land Use Plan Map.
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT
Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - Downtown District
Request: Adopt New Plan for Downtown
STAFF REPORT:
A citizen committee was formed to review the City's Plans
for Downtown. This committee worked as four subcommittees
to develop general proposals for the future of Downtown in
four geographic areas: Capitol (West), Central Business
District (Office Core), MacArthur (East) and East of I-30.
These groups developed similar concepts; thus one committee
was formed out of the four. From their work the Framework
for the Future was developed, this document has been
presented to the Commission and recommended.
The Framework of the Future recommended that the City Land
Use Plan be modified. This item is the first step in that
process. Three changes are requested to bring the Land Use
Plan into line with the recommendations of the Framework
for the Future. First, a new land use category is
proposed. This category is meant to help create a more
traditional urban development form. The exact use is not
as important as the design. Pedestrian friendly design and
24-hour activity are important elements. A mix of uses is
desirable. The new category would be MXU - "Mixed Use -
Urban." The proposed category is as follows:
Mixed Use - Urban: This category provides for a
mix of residential, office and commercial uses
not only in the same block but within the same
structure. This category is intended for older
"urban" areas to allow dissimilar uses to exist,
which, support each other to create a vital area.
Development should reinforce the urban fabric
creating a 24-hour activity area. Using the
Planned Zoning District or the Urban Use
District, high and moderate density developments
that result in a vital (dense) pedestrian
oriented area are appropriate.
The second change to the Land Use Plan is a complete change
of the plan map for District 5 - Downtown. This is an area
from the Arkansas River south to I-630 and from the Missouri
Pacific Rail Line east to I-30. (The current classifications
date to 1980.) In this area the new land use classifications
would be as shown on the attached sketch and described here.
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Cont.)
The entire district, except those areas described below,
would be shown as the new "MXU" - Mixed Use - Urban category.
The following areas would be Public Institutional (PI)
State Capitol area - west of Woodlane and south of 3rd
Streets; the Federal Buildings - Capital Avenue to 4th
Street, Arch Street west to State Street, and
City/County Buildings - Broadway/Markham area.
The following areas would be shown as Low Density
Residential (LDR) : 6th Street to 9th Street from Ferry
to Cumberland; and 9th to I-630 from Commerce to alley
between Scott and Cumberland.
The following areas would be shown as Park/Open Space
(PK/OS): MacArthur Park - 9th Street to I-630,
McAlmont to Commerce; and Riverfront Park -Arkansas
River to Little Rock and Western Railroad Spur.
In addition, the northern portion of the I-30 District from
I-30 to John and Arkansas River to 3rd Street is changed to
Public Institutional from Industrial (the Presidential
Library site) and from 3rd Street to 9th Street I-30 to
College is changed to Mixed Use - Urban from Industrial and
Transition.
The third change to the Land Use Plan is a complete
replacement of the text for the Downtown District. The new
text is from the Framework of the Future. It is basically
the vision statement and goals/objectives. The new text
would be as follows:
DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPALS:
Downtown should become a place where people want to
live and visit and should have a lasting and
recognizable image, distinguishable from all other
nearby environments.
Because it is the State Capitol and proud symbol of a
metropolitan area, Downtown Little Rock has many
opportunities. Downtown should be the financial,
office and governmental center of the region and as
such should be planned as a place where people live,
visit and work in a safe, vibrant, pedestrian -friendly
environment.
The built environmental should encourage a sense of
community and safety among residents and visitors.
K
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Cont.)
Downtown should be planned to become a place of 24-
hour activity. These general planning goals should be
reinforced by such urban design and planning
interventions as the following:
• Specify land uses for entertainment and residential use.
• Preserve and reuse existing buildings.
• Capitalize on the Presidential Library as an economic
development tool.
• Provide an effective transportation plan with a variety
of modes.
• Provide landscaping throughout the area.
• Utilize the Presidential Library as a regional
educational resource center.
• Develop streetscaping plans designed for specific needs
in designated areas.
• Develop a means to encourage property owners to reinvest
in Downtown.
• Work with Federal, State and County governments to ensure
the success of the vision.
■ Specify land uses that will encourage the development of
a niche for retail activities.
• Encourage a built form of quality architectural styles
that evoke character.
• Preserve civic and historic heritage.
• Recognize the riverfront as a key urban activity
generator.
Objective: The Downtown urban form should be
protected by, requiring structures be built to the
street with street level activity and visual
connection between the street and interior.
Action Statement: Modify the development standards to
encourage higher density development and zero lot line
construction. Modify parking regulations (number of
spaces, screening, etc.)
Special design studies should be undertaken and
regulations implemented for streets and corridors of
community -wide importance.
Objective: To support an urban land use form, a fixed
transit system is needed. An investment should be
made in a fixed transit system for Downtown that
effectively connects the different parts of Downtown
and moves people within that area.
3
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Cont.)
Action Statement: Build a transit infrastructure -
fixed routes to serve the Downtown and immediate
vicinity.
Objective: Residential use is essential for -an active
and successful Downtown. Because the Downtown
residential area has lost most of its residential
units, the City of Little Rock should invest in
downtown housing to assist in reviving the area
thereby creating housing opportunities for high as
well as moderate -income levels.
Action Statement: Create development and use
incentives for owner occupied, market rate rental, and
affordable rental residential developments in
Downtown.
Objective: Downtown must be actively marketed. In
most cities a quasi -public agency does this work. The
City should explore (with Downtown property owners)
the possibility of establishing an agency to advance
the economic development of Downtown.
Action Statement: Develop a quasi -public downtown
development agency to market and assist with the
implementation of projects.
Objective: In order to achieve an active Downtown,
developments should be mixed use and linked.
Action Statement: Using the Framework for the Future
document as a reference, establish consensus among
quasi -public, City, County, and State entities
regarding the vision of Downtown. Implement
strategies conducive to the objectives of the
established vision. Assist only developments that
conform to the Framework guidelines.
LAND USE:
Residential:
The blocks, north and west of MacArthur Park, in the
southeast corner of the District are designated as Low
Density Residential (LDR). Within this area, north of
Ninth Street is predominately Multifamily with some
Single Family while south of Ninth Street is
predominately Single Family with some Multifamily.
4
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Cont.
Mixed Use:
The majority of the district is designated for Mixed
Use Urban. The uses range from high-rise office
buildings to single family homes. The intent is to
create a vital diverse area, which is pedestrian- ,
friendly.
Parks and Open Space:
Riverfront Park runs along the Arkansas River along
the northeast portion of the district boundary.
MacArthur Park, the City's first municipal park
established in 1892 is in the southeast corner of the
district.
Public/Institutional:
The State Capitol and related buildings are designated
as Public Use, in the western end of the district.
The Federal Buildings between Capitol Ave. and 4t'
Street from State to Arch Streets are also designated
Public Use. The third Public Use area is the County
and City Buildings along Markham Street around
Broadway.
These changes to the City Land Use Plan will begin the
implementation of the Framework for the Future already
reviewed by the Commission.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(SEPTEMBER 2, 1999)
Because of the changes proposed by this item, the
Commission asked that the item be deferred to allow more
time for reviewing the proposal. The item was placed on
the Consent Agenda for deferral to September 16, 1999. By
a vote of 10 for 0 against (Commissioner Adcock absent) the
item was deferred.
5
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Cont.)
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(SEPTEMBER 16, 1999)
Walter Malone, Planning Staff, requested that the Chair
recognized people with cards for item 2 or item 3 on each
of the items. Mr. Malone proceed with the Land Use Plan
Amendment. This brings the Land Use Plan in line with .the
Downtown Framework document.
Mr. Malone reminded the Commission of the Framework
committees desires for Downtown. Mr. Malone proceed to
review the text and map changes: Addition of definition;
map changes and inclusion of the vision statement and
goals/objections from the Framework document.
There was discussion about the Public/Institutional
designation area for the Presidential Library site.
Commissioner Nunnley asked about the Low Density
Residential (LDR) area shown between 6t' and 9t' Streets on
the eastern edge. There was discussion about the planning
efforts around the Presidential Library site as well as the
use and zoning pattern in the LDR area.
Kathy Wells, presidential of Downtown Neighborhood
Association, stated she was here to "cheer -you -on" and urge
a speedy affirmative vote. At a conference for Downtown
revitalization, James Kunstler was scalding in criticism of
a block of blank wall. This zoning would work to prevent
this. Professor Glasser, University of Arkansas, listed
cities which require street -access shops in parking decks.
The mixed use is important and parking on Main Street is a
problem. Also, use of rooftops is important. On Page 5 of
regulations in the height section, the northern boundary
should be 3rd Street not Markham. The Committee wanted the
skyscrapers back from the Old Statehouse and other public
buildings.
Dickson Flake, this is a good product and will be an asset
for redevelopment. Question about the definition of
"primary street". Mr. Malone, using 3rd Street, explained
the definition. More work is needed on this definition
because of the impact with the alley system and existing
orientation of buildings. Mr. Flake suggested using a
different set back west of Broadway where development more
typically has not been to the street and more auto
oriented. Finally, the regulations should not be made
effective for one year from adoption, due to the long
development process downtown (land consolidation, to
design/finance to construction).
6
LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Cont.)
Commissioner Rahman stated there was a lot of debate about
these issues by the Committee. The definition of "primary
street" may need work but the setbacks were debated.
Things may need to be modified in the future, but the
Commission should approve this. This is a good start.
Commissioner Berry stated he was glad to see this before
the Commission. There were a lot of competing interests
involved in the development of these regulations. We are
lifting the land use regulation, but we need to have design
regulations to make sure everything fits in Downtown. This
is a good starting point and feel good about the proposals.
Commissioner Faust stated this represents a good piece of
staff work. The process brought a lot of interests (some
competing) to the table. This process always works. This
plan iz an example of good sustainable development policy.
Commissioner Adcock asked about the street buffers not
being required. Mr. Malone stated in the "Urban Use"
district the front landscape would not be required because
you want the buildings close to the street not landscape or
parking lot.
Chairman Earnest spoke to the Goals and Objectives and how
that was sustainable development. As we go forward these
objectives should be used as the basis for downtown
revitalization.
Commissioner Hawn moved the approval of the Plan Amendments
(seconded Commissioner Adcock). By a vote of 10 for
0 against the item was approved.
7