HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-02585 ApplicationAPPLICATION FOR REZONING
TO THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION:
FIRE DISTRICT NO.
P.C.AFPROM: , 19
P.C.DENIED
•� s 4
BD.OF DIR. APPROVED: , 19
BD.OF DIR. DENIED , 19
ORDINANCE NO.
ZONING CASE NO. Z
Filing Date:
Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Board of Directors of Little Rock, Ankansas,
through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas law on City Planning, Act 186, of
1957, Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance No. 5420 as
amended, petitioning fnr a rezoning of the following described area:
art of the SES of the SWC: of Section 25. Township _I North. Range 1
West, and described as beginning 1141.9 feet West of the intersection
o -F tba atth i i ne o f C 7 T "1 y
e��r¢ea;e xx=ev—v-s v��'-�c�3-^- TIN, - � Y�V��'�YZ �.. �i. � Wast �l�g• h��c��
line of the Missouri gacific Railroad'and 20 feet North of said Section-
Highway as now paved, 114.0 feet, thence East parallel to the South line
of Sec. 25, 245.1 feet., thence South eet to a point 20 feet Nort of
South line Sec.25. thence West 315.2 feet parallel to South line of_
Sec. 25, to the point of beginning, .707 acre more or less, lying and being ii
Title to this property is vested in: J. L. Graves and Marguerite Graves
It is desired that the boundaries shown on the District Map be amended and that this area
be reclassifified from the present " A " qingle Family District to
" F-11 Commercial District.
Present Use of Property: Single f_aMily_r,"_idence
Desired Use of Property RPta i 1 Rtnrp
-00[KNK,)LW (there are no) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of this property.
The filing fee, required by Ordinance No. 9455 will be paid at the City Collector's Office
on the filing and acceptance of this application by the Zoning Office.
It is understood that notice of the public hearing hereon before the Little Rock
Planning Commission will be published at least 15 days prior to said hearing in a daily
newspaper as required by Act 186 of the 1957 Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of said
Ordinance, and that notice of preliminary hearing before the Commission (PC -18) must
be circulated by the applicant to all other parties in interest, including owners of land
within 200 feet of the boundary of the area under consideration as required by the rules
of the Commission, and that the cost of these notices shall be borne by the applicant.
SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS
Attorneys for
(OWNER) _I T.. Gra-,tng and Marguerite Grave.
or
(AGENT) By
John P. Gill
ADDRESS: 825 F}raMid Y.if+e Bldg,
•
DATEPRONE : Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Form�ZA 6-4-71 (600) — —376 3161
NO. 494 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FILING -FEES
Little Rock, Ark. 1112A,4 19
($75) Zoning Application Fee $�
($25) Board of Adjustment Application Fee $
($10 plus 50¢ per lot/acre)Preliminary Subdivision Fee $
($10 plus 50¢ per e) Final Subdivision Fee $
($5. plus $1 P "1 t Fee $
($20 per in ion) reet Name Signs Fee $
/ � TOTAL $
The above fees sha ubd
paid to the Ci 31 or, j2
1st Floor, C.H21.
GN DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT,
By:
Address of property involved:
Name of applicanto
I
or . V ft
4v k ko A . I
ko
7
Ps r t of t!lp n P ii I r,
d e &or I ted as regi m Ing i 41 9 f t west 0" t tLe L; t pa, r
w,
Soot 1..Ia of Se f! t I on I i N- R. I' 'w 'Wit -
AM 0 # t: p F *j r I Pft,- 1 11
'i '47 d
of t.le Anblepvftle AghwAy i'kF -too- jave-til i r
to, tae South I Inp of 1-145 -1 So,,i
ft
20 ft . North or SdQt'n I ' 71P 5ea 0g, v. o- r, 0 e rt T
ra TI el to
ftsith I ine Ben tO t':- ')O!T.* 0'
- -47-F.
Surveyor
p is
P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL
Planning Division Public Works
Permits & Inspections Division LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Real Estate
Traffic Division 72201
I}
Oil �y
itirG°/4 Re: Case No. Z
j. Address
1l (,� 4
Dear `-
This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a change in, -zoning
from District to
District, the following 3Ctio as taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on
(a) J - Denied
i
(b) Approved as applied for
(c)
Approved - provided:
(d) Rezoned to
(e) Deferred to
Y
An ordinance effecting this rezoning (will not) be submitted to the Board of
Directors for its consideration at its meeting
1-10-72
250
Yours very truly,
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
Don R. Venhaus,
Secretary.
Tract'N'6.10 Za2585 7221 ftbelvale Pike
From: "A"' -One -family District
To ° "P -Commercial District
The Staff"s recommendation was read as follows.- "The Staff recommends denial of this
application. An "F" -Commercial ,use of this property would be out of character with
the immediate residential neighborhood and would adversely affect adjacent properties.
®10=
4
Planning Commission Minutes f
June 1,, 1972
Any change to this property would ultimately result in potential change in the other
properties at this intersection. This has been a well established neighborhood of
fine homes for years. It should be pointed out that the Commission on consideration
of previous rezoning applications involving Mabelvale Pike has maintained the resi-
dential character of this street. Applicant indicates that he proposes to sell
property after rezoning.9°
Mr. John Gill, attorney, was present to represent the applicant, J. L. Graves who
plans to sell the property for the construction of a convenience food store on the
site. He indicated that the application is incorrectly described as it is intended
that the building will front on Forbing Road. He said he was aware of the present
zoning classification on this property, but called attention to the fact that it
is located in the vicinity of U. S. Highway 67/70 or South University Avenue, and
Interstate #30. The J. A. Riggs Tractor Company is located to the south of this
property. It is directly across the street from 99E" classification and in the general
area of very high commercial use. From the map it appears to be in the middle of an
established residential neighborhood. It was in the middle of an established resi-
dential neighborhood when Mabelvale Pike was a main artery in this particular part
of Little Ruck, but that is changed by virtue of the Interstate and University Avenue
in this area. This part of Little Rock is cut off from any food facilities or food
stores, said Mr. Gill, and asked that the property be reclassified for the requested
use as set out in their application.
Mr. Barber reminded the Commission that another corner in the area had been rezoned -
for a Kwick-Chek grocery and a development.plan has been submitted although a build-
ing permit has not been requested. (corrections records reveal building permit
issued December 1971).
The Chairman commented that that particular corner is bad trafficwise and asked
if the owner would dedicate the triangular piece of the property to the City.
Mr. Gill replied haat his client advised him they would not object to a dedication
of some type of strip at that corner but did not know the size they had reference
to. He said he assumed it was for the purpose of straightening out the street at
that intersection.
Mr. Gill asked if it would be appropriate to suggest approval subject to the
dedication of a triangular piece of ground on the wrest part of the tract and
leave it up to the Department of Community Development as to what is really needed.
Mr. Frank Cox, attorney, representing a number of property owners in the vicinity
who opposed the rezoning, was present and filed a petition having 14 signatures. He
took issue with Mr. Gill that Mabelvale Pike has not changed; that the Planning
Commission had been successful in retaining Mabelvale Pike as a residential street.
Mr. Cox: said they feel that this application should be denied because (1) this tract
of land is not adjacent to any commercial establishment and it is some 200 feet west
of a commercial zoning which would be spot zoning; (2) all property in the area is used
and occupied as single-family dwellings and all the property owners have substantial
investments in their property which would depreciate the value of it. Also that Mabel -
vale Pike was constructed many years ago by the County and is a narrow residential street
and Forbi,ng Road is not much better, if any. He added that there is no need to create
any rezoning at this intersection which would generate any more traffic. He said the
situation along Mabelvale Pike is somewhat similar to Mississippi Street in that once
you rezone this corner there would be no reason at all not to rezone Mabelvale Pike
on up to the Interstate.
Planning Commission Minutes -
June 1,1972
Mr. R. L. Collard, who owns property across the street from the subject
property was present and expressed the doubt that a food store is needed
in the area, and added that the values of residences in the area would be
adversely affected.
Mr. Gill said this is not spot zoning as
street and repeated that the owner would
of that triangular portion to the City.
there is "E" zoning across the
be agreeable to dedicating a portion
A motion was made to accept the Staff's recommendation for denial, which was
seconded, but failed for lack of sufficient votes.
The Chairman said he would entertain a motion to defer this matter, but Mr.
Vanhaus said it might be appropriate to entertain a motion based on the appli�
cant's petition to rezone the property to "F"commercial.
A motion was made to rezone the property to "F" -Commercial, which was seconded
but failed for lack of sufficient affirmative votes.
W. Gill asked if it would be appropriate to suggest a motion that the applica-
tion be approved subject to the dedication of the triangular tract on the
western portion of the tract to the City.
The Chairman: asked Mr. W ickard to act as Chairman and Mr. McLean made a motion
that the property be rezoned to "F"- Commercial subject to the dedication
of the western triangular area of 70 foot base and approximately 90 foot height,
which was seconded. The motion failed foc 'lack of sufficient affirmative votes.
Mr. Kemp confirmed that this action was in effect a denial of the application.
BEACH ABSTRACT & GUARANTY COMPANY
BURTON DOUGAN
PRESIDENT
E. A. BOWEN. JR.
VICE PRES. & SECRETARY
CHARLES R. DOUGAN
VICE PRES. & TREASURER
THOS. P. McDONNELL
VICE PRES. & ESCROW OFFICER
JOHN A. CAMERON
VICE PRES. & ESCROW OFFICER
213 WEST SECOND STREET
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
May 6, 1972
Mr. John Gill
Spitzberg, Mitchell & Hays
Pyramid Building
Little Rock, Arkansas
Re: Property within
SW4. Section 25,
Range 13 West.
Dear Mr. Gill;
LEOLA LAMBERT
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
TRUMAN NOLEN
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HAROLD T. WILLIAMS
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
DAN CATO
ASST. ESCROW OFFICER
MELVIN ORENDER
ASST. ESCROW OFFICER
200' of Part of SE -1
Township 1 North,
We have examined the records of Pulaski County, Arkansas, up
to May 3, 1972 @ 8:00 A. M. as to the property lying within 200
feet of the following described tract:
Part of the SE -1- of the SWI of Section 25, Township 1 North,
Range 13 West and described as beginning 1141.9 feet West of
the intersection of the South line of Section 25, with the West
right-of-way line of Missouri Pacific Railroad and 20 feet North
of said Section line; thence North 37 degrees 54 minutes East
along the East right-of-way line of Mabelvale Highway as now
paved, 114.0 feet; thence East parallel to the South line of
Section 25, 245.1 feet; thence South 90 feet to a point 20 feet
North of South line of Section 25; thence West 315.2 feet parallel
to South line of section 25 to the point of beginning, containing
0.707 acres more or less
and find that the property described on the attached three sheets
lies within 200 feet of the above property and that the names set out
opposite the descriptions shown thereon are the last apparent owners
of record of said property. We do not certify as to validity of title
nor do we guarantee the correctness of the addresses furnished.
Sincerely yours,
E. A. Bowen, Jr.
Vice President
encl
Funning Commission Minutes
June 1, 1-972
He cited its relationship to theBaptist Hospital complex on the north, and a pattern
being established along Kanas Road of high intensity commercial to the east with
institutional and public use next to their property. The proposed project would
have 60 1 -bedroom townhouses, 20 3 -bedroom units,and 158 2 -bedroom units, costing
$3,500,000. which would generate approximately $25,000, in taxes to the public
and school system. These are proposed to be luxury type apartments or townhouses.
Mr. Paul Stittle, 1615 East Twin Lakes Drive, was present and presented a petition
having approximately 150 signatures. Basically his ob,jecti s concerned increased
traffic which would be hazardous to the many children in he area, and in his
opinion there- is no need for this density at this time" this area.
Mr. Paul Brow- 9615 Relda Drive was
present and stated that he bought his house
for $20,000. in`Q.ctober, 1971, and his property has increased in value from 2% to
5%, and this project would depreciate the value of his property.
Mr. Richard Cox, 9412 Cerelle Drive, was present and stated his concern was the
large increase in residents in 238 units, that access would be from Kanis Road and
Barrow Road only into the complex, and the safety of children living in the area
from the increased traffic.
Mrs. Madge McDaniel, 9419 CeAbba
ve, was present stating that the parking area
for the complex would be in yard.
Mr. Roy N. Chancellor, 1512 East Twin' `k'es Drive, was present saying that he had
lived there for five years and bought hhouse as a retirement location. He said
Kanis Road is very narrow and the intersection of Kanis and Barrow Road is a high
accident area, and in his opinion there is no need for more apartments in the
vicinity.
Mr. Hodges answered some of the voiced objections saying that the traffic problems
will be there from now on, but that Kanis Road has been'. designated as an arterial
street as has Barrow Road, and while they have no solution.for the traffic problem,
there is no way to avoid it regardless of the proposed project. As to the parking
it will be located in the 100 foot buffer between the property line and the build-
ing and will provide a 30 foot strip between any parking or any construction which
would ,be heavily landscaped on the total periphery of their property. The architect-
ural design they will establish here is going to be a positive one, he said, and that
th plan more screening and landscaping than is required by City standards.
A motion was made for approval of the application, which was seconded, but failed
for lack of sufficient affirmative votes.
Mr. Venhaus pointed out that inasmuch as this constituted a denial of the applica-
tion, the applicant had the right of appeal to the Board of Directo s, and that
notice of the hearing would again be sent out to property owners witihin 200 feet
of the property if the r re appealed.
Tract No.10 = Z- 2585 7221 Mabelvile Pike
From: "A" -One -family District
To ^ "F" -Commercial District
The Staff's recommendation mas read as follows: "The Staff recommends denial of this
application. An "F" -Commercial ,use of this property would be out of character with
the immediate residential neighborhood and would adversely affect adjacent properties.
-10-
Pining Commission Minutes
June 1, 1972
Any change to this property would ultimately result in potential change in the other
properties at this intersection. This has been a well established neighborhood of
fine homes for years. It should be pointed out that the Commission on consideration
of previous rezoning applications involving Mabelvale Pike has maintained the resi-
dential character of this street. Applicant indicates that he proposes to sell
property after rezoning."
Mr. John Gill, attorney, was present to represent the applicant, J. L. Graves who
plans to sell the property for the construction of a convenience food store on the
site. He indicated that the application is incorrectly described as it is intended
that the building will front on Forbing Road. He said he was aware of the present
zoning classification on this property, but called attention to the fact that it
is located in the vicinity of U. S. Highway 67%70 or South University Avenue, and
Interstate #30. The J. A. Riggs Tractor Company is located to the south of this
property. It is directly across the street from "E" classification and in the general
area of very high commercial use. From the map it appears to be in the middle of an
established residential neighborhood. It was in the middle of an established resi-
dential neighborhood when Mabelvale Pike was a main artery in this particular part
of Little Rock, but that is changed by virtue of the Interstate and University Avenue
in this area. This part of Little Rock is cut off.from any food facilities or food
stores, said Mr. Gill, and asked that the property be reclassified for the requested
use as set out in their application.
Mr. Barber reminded the Commission that another corner in the area had been rezoned -
for a Kwick-Chek grocery and a development plan has been submitted although a build-
ing permit has not been requested. (corrections records reveal building permit
issued December 1971).
The Chairman commented that that particular corner is bad trafficwise and asked
if the owner would dedicate the triangular piece of the property to the City.
Mr. Gill replied that his client advised him they would not object to a dedication
of some type of strip at that corner but did not know the size they had reference
to. He said he assumed it was for the purpose of straightening out the street at
that intersection.
Mr. Gill asked if it would be appropriate to suggest approval subject to the
dedication of a triangular piece of ground on the west part of the tract and
leave it up to the Department of Community Development as to what is really needed.
Mr. Frank Cox, attorney, representing a number of property owners in the vicinity
who opposed the rezoning, was present and filed a petition having 14 signatures. He
took issue with Mr. Gill that Mabelvale Pike has not changed; that the Planning
Commission had been successful in retaining Mabelvale Pike as a residential street.
Mr. Cox said they feel that this application should be denied because (1) this tract
of land is not adjacent to any commercial establishment and it is some 200 feet west
of a commercial zoning which would be spot zoning; (2) all property in the area is used
and occupied as single-family dwellings and all the property owners have substantial
investments in their property which would depreciate the value of it. Also that Mabel -
vale Pike was constructed many years ago by the County and is a narrow residential street
and Forbi.ng Road is not much better, if any. He added that there is no need to create
any rezoning at this intersection which would generate any more traffic. He said the
situation along Mabelvale Pike is somewhat similar to Mississippi Street in that once
you rezone this corner there would be no reason at all not to rezone Mabelvale Pike
on up to the Interstate.
Planning Commission Minutes -
June 1,1972
Mr. R. L. Collard, who owns property across the street from the subject
property was present and expressed the doubt that a food store is needed
in the area, and added that the values of residences in the area would be
adversely affected.
Mr. Gill said this is not spot zoning as there is "'R" zoning across the
street and repeated that the owner would be agreeable to dedicating a portion
of that triangular portion to the City.
A motion was made to accept the Staff's recommendation for denial, which was
seconded, but failed for lack of sufficient votes.
The Chairman said he would entertain a motion to defer this matter, but Mr.
Vanhaus said it might be appropriate to entertain a motion based on the appli-
cant's petition to rezone the property to "F"=Commercial.
A motion was made to rezone the property to "F" -Commercial, which was seconded
but failed for lack of sufficient affirmative votes.
Mr. Gill asked .if it would be appropriate to suggest a motion that the applica-
tion be approved subject to the dedication of the triangular tract on the
western portion of the tract to the City.
The Chairman asked Mr. Wickard to act as Chairman and Mr. McLean made a motion
that the property be rezoned to "P- Commercial subject to the dedication
of the western triangular area of 70 foot base and approximately 90 foot height,
which was seconded. The motion failed for Lack of sufficient affirmative votes.
Mr. Kemp confirmed that this action was in effect a denial of the application.
LAW OFFICES
SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS
HENRY E. SPITZBERG
H. MAURICE MITCHELL
STEELE HAYS
BERESFORD L. CHURCH, JR.
JOHN P. GILL
JOSEPH W. GELZINE
W. CHRISTOPHER BARRIER
JERRY D. JACKSON
OF COUNSEL
BROOKS HAYS
Mr. Richard Wood
Department of Community
Development
City Hall
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Re: 7221 Mabelvale Pike
Dear Richard:
PYRAMID LIFE BUILDING
LITTLE Rocx,ARHANSAs 72201
(501) 3Z6-3151
May 23, 1972
I have enclosed herewith an Abstractor's
Certificate showing the owners of property Within 200
feet of the above property, together with' a lcopy of
a letter sent to each owner by certified mail,, and
the receipts therefor.
Very t u.ly yours,
/ 4
Jolie P. Gill
JPG:rb
Enclosures
-alaq p3gli3sap aplya paiagwnu ay} paAlaaay
ldl333a
aassaippe 01 RaJan119p aJaym
AINO iaAilaQ L—! ssa.ippe pue a}ep'wogm 01 M014 Ij
(saaga.Lae asav aof pasynba.a sa54-10 louopg?ppY)
(S)N301S 03N33H3 AS 031V310N[ (S)331AH3S HSINmnzI 3SV31d
apls iayfo uo sum anipul Mollo} of air's 36 :IMINH
IIN3sv 3MINOOV RC1 auftv=
N.V
0 3W_tlN a0.3 lLL S
mopq pagliasap apipa paiagwnu ay{ paAlaoall
141333?!
eassa.ippe 01 pajaA!Jap aiaym
AINO iaAlIGG D ssaippe pue a}ep'wOgm o}mOgG LI
(saozaZas 909117 lof pa.cznba.c saffevgo pauoyjjppy )
(SMOIS 03N33H3 AS Q31VOICINI (0301AUS HSINmnJ 3SV31d
apls iayfo u® suol}zni}sul inollo} of gins aB :jr3GN3S
FS Form 3811 Nov. 1970 a,—m-81277-1
A
T
oc
MENIL I "Z
aq.9finxt }
iholaq paglrasap a)i,fao--
ld1333H
aassaappe 01 paianilap aiaym
AINO i9A!Ia(3 ssaippe pue a}ep'uloym 0}MOyS
(saoza as asaw aoj paatnbaz safi.evya PuoMppy)
(S)N0018 (33)133H3 AS 031VOIGNI (S)33103S HSINi w 3SV31d
apls iayfo uo suol}oni}Sul A+ollot Of air's a8:?l3QN3„` ~'
f ---
t, -zo
--to
if
111
C
nto
C] 0
r
to r -
m
z my
N
(n
0
f9
w
0
I
-o
m
m
CA
J a
m
3cncn
�
2 O Z
en
m3 omm
aCL P
m �
h n Q
91 m
d i —
a w v
M -?
CL
d
rncny.O
0
�m
h W
m �
�n
�x
n
01 m
w= a
C. <
a CD W
CD
N Z ('
CD
v
O y
N O S
®CD `°
tA
'da
c m n
O
e
n T�
N36
m
CL
Q
m a m
0
m
-_
-0
04
w
-
-0,. � c O
�'
� W
F
b O
N ro
m
C.i
A
T
oc
MENIL I "Z
aq.9finxt }
iholaq paglrasap a)i,fao--
ld1333H
aassaappe 01 paianilap aiaym
AINO i9A!Ia(3 ssaippe pue a}ep'uloym 0}MOyS
(saoza as asaw aoj paatnbaz safi.evya PuoMppy)
(S)N0018 (33)133H3 AS 031VOIGNI (S)33103S HSINi w 3SV31d
apls iayfo uo suol}oni}Sul A+ollot Of air's a8:?l3QN3„` ~'
f ---
t, -zo
--to
if
111
C
nto
C] 0
r
to r -
m
z my
N
(n
0
f9
w
0
I
-o
m
m
CA
J a
m
3cncn
�
2 O Z
en
m3 omm
aCL P
m �
h n Q
91 m
d i —
a w v
M -?
CL
d
rncny.O
0
�m
h W
m �
�n
�x
n
01 m
w= a
C. <
a CD W
CD
N Z ('
CD
v
IC
WD
0a
W�
EL'S
in
z
r0
�
W
OL a
d pj
0
O
U
a `m
a a u
Nc c
zM00
O 3y
5 O
O
O 0 C U Y
O
0 Q: �� a
W ~Y a0
c in 0
9 U
u CO
m w N co
13 E
z .N c
E m d
w O m 0
2 W
a J3 E
d ,� E
ca tio
U y ti
sl m
sa Om w
a y
•' N O
C • •
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services
Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
I I where delivered [I to addressee
RECEIPT
AL- ....,.,hissed arficle described below
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
" P"LE'tSE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
Show to whom, date and address((�"� Deliver ONLY
where delivered 11 to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
No.
'URE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Vu3t aluy:vs 4c filled in)
r
SURE OF ADDRE 'S AGEML iF ANY
M DEUV' RED (Only if requested, and include ZIP Cada)
SENDER: Qsuie to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNIS S;RVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
Showto whom, date and address Fi Deliver ONLY
where delivered I ` to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
t-LLZSS—Bt-54D 0161 'ADN UUod Sd
:n
O ON
•y Lu IG
W a�
a W
e L) a
0
e m m
O o"i
V W
y c..i m
3 0 a
Z a a
O ca
�► a
O W Is
r. L) d
U
LI,1 0
m O 0
W
C!7 s ar
O Z 0 7
iu
N U.
W G) 3
W
W 01
a
0
K I—
Z
7 0
F
W
W
Wz
N
A
0
O —
a. U
LL
Vl la.
=i O
I-LUIS-9T—SP OL6T 'nor
V)
f
LJ,
(r -
`— ....
I,r IL
CL
=3
U)
T iB� UL10J Sd
L--
12
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
p\l AASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Addit7onal charges required for these services)
Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered D to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
EjShow to whom, date and ad4iess Deliver ONLY
where delivered Q to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
`(&Po� dlZ a n ul un sa011 .!.a r u )
tl333h113tl 3S3HM MONS (s3it3A133tl 31Vtl
Z
'ON
�r tl3�l1SN
ANtl 31
'1N
30V,-S,33SS3h0Y O k1MIS
2!
11111193
(,Lx palig ag rfcnsalo 7-10 335maay n nyN 8a 3a_n1VN31S ON GMUSiO3i1
Molaq psgposap apipa paaaquinu ag} panlaaall
1d13338
aassaippe o; paJaAllap GJ914M 1J1
AINO JGA►1aa 11 ssaippe pug a}ep 1WogM o} MogS I�
(saoea4as asaxl7 xof pulnba.c s9fmyo pouox7;eppy)
(S)N3018 (33)133H3 A8 (331V31CINI (S)331AH3S HSIN2lfl-4 3SV3Id
apls SOW uo sucli3fi4sul Moho; of awns Of :V3GN3S
�
O �
c=L
a
a
a�
W
Wz
N
A
0
O —
a. U
LL
Vl la.
=i O
I-LUIS-9T—SP OL6T 'nor
V)
f
LJ,
(r -
`— ....
I,r IL
CL
=3
U)
T iB� UL10J Sd
L--
12
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
p\l AASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Addit7onal charges required for these services)
Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered D to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
EjShow to whom, date and ad4iess Deliver ONLY
where delivered Q to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
`(&Po� dlZ a n ul un sa011 .!.a r u )
tl333h113tl 3S3HM MONS (s3it3A133tl 31Vtl
Z
'ON
�r tl3�l1SN
ANtl 31
'1N
30V,-S,33SS3h0Y O k1MIS
2!
11111193
(,Lx palig ag rfcnsalo 7-10 335maay n nyN 8a 3a_n1VN31S ON GMUSiO3i1
Molaq psgposap apipa paaaquinu ag} panlaaall
1d13338
aassaippe o; paJaAllap GJ914M 1J1
AINO JGA►1aa 11 ssaippe pug a}ep 1WogM o} MogS I�
(saoea4as asaxl7 xof pulnba.c s9fmyo pouox7;eppy)
(S)N3018 (33)133H3 A8 (331V31CINI (S)331AH3S HSIN2lfl-4 3SV3Id
apls SOW uo sucli3fi4sul Moho; of awns Of :V3GN3S
Y Jm
ci Z N
0 0Cn
m �v
C >�
W °' o
W 2 F13:
•S
V
m%
m
W
Q in
V d a
ZIga
�. I
(A a c
W a
V p ++
a
E
s
U) 3 d
Z` °a
Ir 3
M 0
3
W
Cl)❑
Q
W
a
3
d
.a
'o
s
.o
U
a
a'a
d
I— u
G.+=
W o
L) -0
W�
E
d
A
w
U
w
04
i-LLZi8-9I—SSS OM 'soN 119C ar,oj Sd
W
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered ❑ to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered ❑ to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
REGISTERED NO.SIGNATURE OR NA14E OF ADDRESSEE (Must always bu filied in)
CERTIFIED NO. 1
';� i C) � 4 T SJGNATQRE dF ADORESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY
if rrquFaterl, and inclWs 21P Code)
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICES) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
QAdditional charges required for these services)
Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered ❑ to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
REGISTERED NO. ` SIGNATURE OR NAME OF Af)ORESSE'E (+Must aheetug bs fiald in)
C-
0
0
Z
F o
W,a
ut
W
FN
ao
sC)
ao
W�-
o2
}�
0 y
�<
U N
=a-
IL m`
LLS
NL N
hoO U
Cn C a
Z a O m
tjF
� Y O
V • _ o
O
t.
y � 9
a
U 9
Ix
o E m
Z�._v
41 W
�
T a
E
3 m ami
in
o y a
mo > E
cWi Ch
a°
>w
mdE
o Z
m
N to
a
7
m
F J
o
O Q
U
D
• •
bf 0
CO.
i-LLZi8-9I—SSS OM 'soN 119C ar,oj Sd
W
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered ❑ to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
(Additional charges required for these services)
❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered ❑ to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
REGISTERED NO.SIGNATURE OR NA14E OF ADDRESSEE (Must always bu filied in)
CERTIFIED NO. 1
';� i C) � 4 T SJGNATQRE dF ADORESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY
if rrquFaterl, and inclWs 21P Code)
SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side
PLEASE FURNISH SERVICES) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)
QAdditional charges required for these services)
Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY
where delivered ❑ to addressee
RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
REGISTERED NO. ` SIGNATURE OR NAME OF Af)ORESSE'E (+Must aheetug bs fiald in)
C-
�1
GRACE R 0 A rL)
r
! I I
", ..A
722.1 IMSELVA4.9
UVAPE (ot 19 7Z ***-,PfAfg-r
SC&I 11L lit* 7.000
MAA
The 0 6 cr &a
M-E.GRIPPEN
J, r,. KU ESE
le
/ IDO
A
GEO. D
BARB
iER'SON
BRUC
H.
DYE ns
a.
3K
--o
WELCH
L. L
LRAVES BOYER 4E T I 4i
I U!
2y. '
Ll #
4 RAY "INC
k
N V-4 L
I
33 i t-06ITT
c -T
PARat
2
mg
14#*
33
IG
�'
.o
r
� �,
+�
I38
10
PARat
2
mg
OWNER
DESCRIPTION
Thomas Richard Kesler and
Part of the SEk of the SWk, Section 25,
Martha Sue Kesler
Township 1 North, Range 13 West, described
7208 Mabelvale Pike
as follows: Beginning at a point 501.0
feet North of and North 89 degrees 45
minutes East 522.0 feet of the Southwest
corner of said SEk SWk; thence South 2
degrees 06minutes East 320.6 feet; thence
East 103.4 feet; thence North 15 degrees
21 minutes East 70.0 feet; thence South
66 degrees 02 minutes East 170.0 feet to
the West line of Mabelvale Pike; thence
North 37 degrees 40minutes East 254.3
feet along the West line of Mabelvale
Pike; thence North 83 degrees 54 minutes
West 176.0 feet; thence North 0 degrees
15 minutes West 100.0 feet; thence South
89 degrees 45 minutes West 271.4 feet to
the Point of Beginning.
Doyne C. Oliver and
Part of the SEk of the SWk, Section 25,
Dovie Lee Oliver
Township 1 North, Range 13 West, described
7212 Mabelvale Pike
as follows: From a point on the North
Right -of -Way line of the Mabelvale Pike,
which point is 20 feet North and 537.6 feet
East of the Southwest corner of the said
SEk SWk; run North 2 degrees 06 minutes
West for 160.7 feet; thence East 103.4
feet to the Point of Beginning; thence
North 15 degrees 21 minutes East 70.0 feet;
thence South 66 degrees 02 minutes East
170.0 feet to a point on the Westerly Right -
of -Way line of the Mabelvale Pike; thence
Southwesterly along said Westerly Right -of -
Way line to a point which is on said Right -
of -Way line and which is South 26 degrees
16 minutes East and 145.8 feet from the
Point of Beginning; thence North 26 degrees
16 minutes West 145.8 feet to the Point
of Beginning.
R. L. Collard and
Part of the SEk of the SWk, Section 25,
Anna Pauline Collard
Township 1 North, Range 13 West, described
7220 Mabelvale Pike
as follows: Begin 537.6 feet East and 20
feet North of the Southwest corner of said
SEk SWk; thence North 160.7 feet; thence
East 103.4 feet; thence South 26 degrees
16 minutes East 145.8 feet to the West line
of Mabelvale Pike; thence Westerly along
the West line of said Pike to the Point
of Beginning.
E. G. Puett and
Part of the SWk SEk and part of the SEk SWk,
Viola M. Puett
Section 25, Township 1 North, Range 13 West,
6624 Forbing Road
described as follows: Begin 406.7 feet
West and 20 feet North of intersection of
South line of SWk SEk, Section 25 with West
Right -of -Way line of MoPac Railroad; thence
West 140 feet parallel to South line of
SWk SEk and South line SEk SWk Section 25;
thence North 180 feet; thence East 140
feet; thence South 180 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing .643 acres more
or less.
OWNER
Leroy D. Boyett and
Gladys Boyett
6708 Forbing Road
Leo E. Gaither and
Verna M. Gaither
6720 Forbing Road
Jessie L.,'Graves and
Marguerite Graves
7721 Mabelvale Pike
Cecil M. Howell and
Reba B. Howell
8003 Edwine Drive
Joe E. Rhodes
Vada H. Rhodes
7201 Mabelvale
and
Pike
DESCRIPTION
Part of the SE4 of the SW4, Section 25,
Township 1 North, Range 13 West, described
as follows: Beginning 546.7 feet West
of the intersection of the South line of
the SW4 SE4 Section 25 with the West Right -
of -Way line of the MOP Railroad and 20 feet
North; thence West 140 feet parallel to
the South line of the SE4 SW4 Section 25;
thence North 180 feet; thence East 140
feet; thence South 180 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing .643 acres, more
or less.
Part of the SE4 of the SW4, Section 25,
Township 1 North, Range 13 West, described
as follows: Begin 686.7 feet West and 20
feet North of intersection of South line
SE4 SW4 said section with West Right -of -
Way line of MoPac Railroad? :thence:_Mest
140 feet parallel with South line SE4 SW4;
thence North 180 feet; thence East 140
feet; thence South 180 feet to Beginning,
containing .643 acres, more or less.
Part of the SE4 SW4, Section 25, Township
1 North, Range 13 West, described as begin
1141.9 feet West of intersection of South
line of Section 25, T1N, R13W, with the
WestRight-of-Way line of MoPac Railroad
and 20 feet North of said Section line;
thence North 37 degrees 54 minutes East
along the East line of Mabelvale Highway
as now paved 114.0 feet; thence East
parallel to South line of Section 25, 245.1
feet; thence South 90 feet to a point 20
feet North of South line Section 25;
thence West 315.2 feet parallel to South
line of section 25, to Point of Beginning,
containing .707 acres more or less, in
Pulaski County, Arkansas.
Part of the SE4 SW4, Section 25, Township
1 North, Range 13 West, described as
beginning 1141.9 feet West and 20 feet
North of the intersection of the South line
of Section 25 with the West Right -of -Way of
the MOP Railroad; thence North 37 degrees
54 minutes East 114.0 feet along the East
line of the Mabelvale Highway to the South-
west corner of the land to be described;
thence East 245.1 feet parallel to the South
line of Section 25; thence North 100.0
feet; thence West 167.2 feet parallel to
the South line of Section 25; to the East
line of Mabelvale Highway; thence South 37
degrees 54 minutes West along said Highway
126.7 feet to the Point of Beginning
Part of the SE4 SW4, Section 25, Township
1 North, Range 13 West, described as begin
200 feet North and 4 feet West of Southeast
corner of SE --4 SW4 Section 25; thence North
221.4 feet; thence North 88 degrees 20
West 281.8 feet to East line of Mabelvale
Highway and 25 feet from center line as now
paved; thence South 37 degrees 54 minutes
(CONTD.)
OWNER
Joe E. Rhodes (CONDT.)
DESCRIPTION
West 287.2 feet along said East line of
Mabelvale Highway; thence East parallel to
South line of SEk SW'k a distance of 167.2
feet; thence South 10 feet; thence East
parallel to South line of SEk SWk 280 feet
to Beginning, containing 1.85 acres, more
or less.
Leo Tollett and Part of the SEk SW'k, Section 25, Township
Maxine Tollett 1 North, Range 13 West, described as Begin
7117 Mabelvale Pike at a point 421.4 feet North and 4 feet
West of the Southeast corner of said SEk
SW'k; thence North 88 degrees 20 minutes
West 281.8 feet to the East line of Mabel -
vale Highway, and 25 feet from the center
line of said Highway as now paved; thence
Northeasterly along said Highway 100 feet;
thence South 88 degrees 20 minutes East
236 feet; thence South 90 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing .535 acres,
more or less.
Wade F. Hansford and
Ora G. Hansford
700 East 9th Street
Dr. John Hugh Abercombie (1/3)
Dr. Charles W. Fowler (1/3)
Edward Penick (1/3)
Vesta J. Abercrombie
1123 West 8th Street
Raymond P. Merritt and
Taletta M. Merritt
6707 Forbing Road
J. 0. Dickey and
Essie J. Dickey
#3 Wanda Lane
James J. Holland and
Herta M. Holland
7323 Mabelvale Pike
Lot 3, HANSFORD SUBDIVISION.
All that part of the Ek W-3/4 E2 NEk NWk,
Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 13 West,
which lies North of a line described as
follows: Beginning at a point on the West
line of said Ek W-3/4 Ek NEk NWk 317.7 feet
South of the Northwest corner thereof;
thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes East
247.65 feet, more or less, to the East line
of said Ek W-3/4 Ek NEk NWk.
The North 317.7 feet of E' W-3/4 NEk NWk,
EXCEPT the West 247.5 feet thereof,
Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 13 West.
Lots 1 and 2, THE TALETTA SUBDIVISION.
Lot 30 A, Replat of Lot 30, J. 0. DICKEY'S
SUBDIVISION.
Lot 30 B, Replat of Lot 30, J. 0. DICKEY'S
SUBDIVISION.
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
TO THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION:
FIRE DISTRICT NO. O
P.C„A , 19
P.C.DENIED U(AAA-k !, 1922
BD.OF DIR. APPROVED: , 19
BD.OF DIR. DENIED , 19
ORDINANCE NO.
ZONING CASE NO. Z
Filing Date:
Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Board of Directors of Little Rock, Arkansas,
through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas law on City Planning, Act 186, of
1957, Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance No. 5420 as
amended, petitioning £or a rezoning of the following described area:
Part of the SE'k, of the SWI; of Section 25, Townshig 1 North, Range U
West, and described as beginning 1141.9 feet West of the intersection
OF t'he _2011t14 3inA of 96G.255 TIN, R 13 W, wLyh the wer'+- D4
C) ht Wa3 —
line of the Missouri gacific Railroad and 20 feet North of said Section-
ttnU9 LhenCe North 37 and 54' EasC atong the East Itne of the
Highway as now paved, 114.0 feet, thence East parallel to the South line
or Sec. 25, 245.1 feet', thence South feet to a point 20 feet Nor—t——of
South line Sec 25 thence West 315.2 feet _parallel to South line of
Sec. 25, to the point of beginning, .707 acre more or less, lying and being ii
Title to this property is vested in:J. L Graves and Marguerite Graves
It is desired that the boundaries shown on the District Map be amended and that this area
be reclassifified from the present " A " Single Family, District to
if F-11 Commercial District.
Present Use of Property:
Desired Use of Property: RP ai 1 Star
Off) (there are no) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of this -property.
The filing fee, required by Ordinance No. 9455 will be paid at the City Collector's Office
on the filing and acceptance of this application by the Zoning Office.
It is understood that notice of the public hearing hereon before the Little Rock
Planning Commission will be published at least 15 days prior to said hearing in a daily
newspaper as required by Act 186 of the 1957 Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of said
Ordinance, and that notice of preliminary hearing before the Commission (PC -18) must
be circulated by the applicant to all other parties in interest, including owners of land
within 200 feet of the boundary of the area under consideration as required by the rules
of the Commission, and that the cost of these notices shall be borne by the applicant.
SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS
Attorneys for
(OWNER) Grave;
or
(AGENT) B
John P. Gill
ADDRESS: 82
spyramid T fe glfgg.
DATE•.PHONE : Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
FormZA 6-4-71 (600) - .37;�-313
THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE MUST ACCOMPANY THE REZONING APPLICATION
(Fill in or cross out words or lines not appropriate)
1. I am the (gX) (legally designated agent) of the property involved in this
application.
2.
(a) The rezoning of this property has been requested before )
(b) The rezoning of this property was requested previously (date)
changing it from District to
District
(no)
3. For what purpose is property presently used: Single family residence
4. The intended use of this property is: Retail Store
5. I (aM (do not) propose use of the property as it is (exclusive of minor repair) if
rezoned. (If you do, have you discussed this with the Building Inspection Division of
this Department (yes) (no)
6. If rezoned:
(a) I have an immediate builder - (yes) (no)
(b) Plan to develop in the future - (yes) (no)
(c) Plan to sell after rezoning - (yes) )
7. The proposed rezoning:
(a) Is compatible with the established land -use pattern of adjacent properties in
the immediate area (yes) (9£)
(b) Would create an isolated zoned lot or tract incompatible with adjacent zoned
property (" (no)
8. The basic land -use pattern of the immediate area has changed recently - (yes) -)
9. The proposed zoning:
(a) (VW) (will not) in my opinion adversely affect living conditions in the
neighborhood
(b) X) (will not) in my opinion, adversely affect the value of adjacent
properties
(c) (T�M) (will not) in my opinion, deter the improvement or development of
adjacent property
(d) (TIM) (will not) in my opinion, adversely affect the character of the
immediate area
10. (a) The general character of the immediate area is "built up"
(DO X XI X
11. In my opinion, the rezoning of this property (M) (will not) result in an
(�R (decrease) in traffic incident to the intended use of the property.
12. I have parking spaces sufficient to comply with requirements of the City Ordinance
under my present zoning classification (yes) (rte
13. If property is rezoned:
(a) Sufficient parking is now available (yes)
(b) The required additional parking will be provided (yes) (no)
14. There (W (is not) any restriction on this property imposed by a Bill of Assurance -
(should there be one, I realize I shall be liable to the property owners having a
common interest in this matter) SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & DAYS, Attorney for
J. L. Graves and Marguerite Graves
Date: April 28, 1972
12-6-71 200
Signature of Owner, or legally Authorized Agent.
John P. Gill
1825 Pyramid Life Building
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
P E T I T I O N
TO: THE MEMBERS OF THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
We, the undersigned property owners, and residing in the
vicinity of the intersection of Forbing Road and Mabelvale
Pike, do hereby respectfully object to the application of J. L.
Graves and Marguerite Graves, seeking to rezone their property
from "A" Single Family to "F" Commercial.
We submit that said application for rezoning should be
denied for the following reasons:
1. The property sought to be rezoned is not adjacent to
any commercial property and would constitute "Spot Zoning".
2. All the property in the area is used and occupied as
Single Family Dwellings, and we all have substantial invest-
ments in our homes. We feel that if this application is approved
and the property rezoned, it will substantially lower the values
of our homes.
3. Mabelvale Pike and Forbing Road were not constructed
to carry the heavy traffic that would be generated by commercial
use of property in this area.
4. The rezoning of this property would be an encroachment
on a well established Single Family Residential District.
RESPECTUFLLY SUBMITTED,
z�
Z ,
7 0.>_ s ��-
i
?z
/ lf6f
P E T I T I O N
TO: THE MEMBERS OF THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNIISG COMMISSION
We, the undersigned property owners, and residing in the _
vicinity of the intersection of Forbing Road and Mabelvale
Pike, do hereby respectfully object to the application of J. L.
Graves and Marguerite Graves, seeking to rezone their property
from "A" Single Family to "F" Commercial.
S ,
We submit that said application for rezoning should be
denied for the following reasons:
1. The property sought to be rezoned is not adjacent to
any commercial property and would constitute "'Spot Zoning".
2. All the property in the area is used and occupied as
Single Family Dwellings, and we all have subartantial invest-
ments in our homes. We feel that if this application is approved
and the property rezoned, it will substantially lower the values
of our homes.
3. Mabelvale Pike and Forbing Road were :not constructed
to carry the heavy traffic that would be genenated by commercial
use of property in this area.
4. The rezoning of this property would bee an encroachment
on a well established Single Family Residential District.
RESPEC=TUFLLY SUBMITTED,
3
LS
zzLaztz g�L
72— Zo �-
%/l /'M, le, A,
P E T I T I O N
TO: THE MEMBERS OF THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
We, the undersigned property owners, and residing in the
vicinity of the intersection of Forbing Road and Mabelvale
Pike, do hereby respectfully object to the application of J. L.
Graves and Marguerite Graves, seeking to rezone their property
from "A" Single Family to "F" Commercial.
We submit that said application for rezoning should be
denied for the following reasons:
1. The property sought to be rezoned is not adjacent to
any commercial property and would constitute "Spot Zoning".
2. All the property in the area is used and occupied as
Single Family Dwellings, and we all have substantial invest-
ments in our homes. We feel that if this application is approved
and the property rezoned, it will substantially lower the values
of our homes.
3. Mabelvale Pike and Forbing Road were not constructed
to carry the heavy traffic that would be generated by commercial
use of property in this area.
4. The rezoning of this property would be an encroachment
on a well established Single Family Residential District.
VIA
RESPECTUFLLY SUBMITTED,
P E T I T I O N
TO: THE MEMBERS OF THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
We, the undersigned property owners, and residing in the
vicinity of the intersection of Forbing Road and Mabelvale
Pike, do hereby respectfully object to the application of J. L.
Graves and Marguerite Graves, seeking to rezone their property
from "A" Single Family to "F" Commercial.
We submit that said application for rezoning should be
denied for the following reasons:
1. The property sought to be rezoned is not adjacent to
any commercial property and would constitute "Spot Zoning".
2. All the property in the area is used and occupied as
Single Family Dwellings, and we all have substantial invest-
ments in our homes. We feel that if this application is approved
and the property rezoned, it will substantially lower the values
of our homes.
3. Mabelvale Pike and Forbing Road were not constructed
to carry the heavy traffic that would be generated by commercial
use of property in this area.
4. The rezoning of this property would be an encroachment
on a well established Single Family Residential District.
RESPECTUFLLY SUBMITTED,
6
lei kJ 7t6_,,
-1"
7d J0 zle
AIL_
Ll
42 / �► -
�/
72- 00 �- �
This letter will advise that an application has
been filed with the Little Rock Planning Commission to
rezone from "A" single family to "F" coumtercial classifi-
cation of the following described property, to wit:
Part of the SE -1/4 of the SW -1/4 of
Section 25, Township 1 North, Range 13
West, and described as beginning 1141.9
feet West of the intersection of the
South line of Sec. 25, T1N, R13 West, with
the West right-of-way line of the Missouri -
Pacific Railroad and 20 feet Porth of said
section line, thence North 37 degrees and
54' East along the East line of the Mabel -
vale Highway as now paved, 114.0 feet,
thence East parallel to the South line of
Sec. 25, 245.1 feet, thence South 90 feet
to a point 20 feet North of South line
Sec. 25, thence West 315.2 feet parallel
to South line of Sec. 25, to the point of
beginning, .707 acre more or less, lying
and being in the County of Pulaski, town
of Little Rock, State of Arkansas.
A public hearing on said application will be
held by the Planning Corcanission in the Board of Directors
Chamber, City Hall on June 1, 1972, at 3 o'clock p.m.
While your presence thereat is not necessary, you may
appear at that time to express your views on the request.
SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS
Attorneys for J. L. Graves
and Marguerite Graves
By
John P. Gill