Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-02579 ApplicationA P P L I C A T I O N LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR A ZONING VARIANCE FIRE DISTRICT *� CASE NO. Z fx S APPLICATION WAS - GRANTED - DENIED r— SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Chairman Little Rock. Board of Adjustment APPLE CANT e Z `t"d�f ADDRESS o f W ,5m , ST OWNER . o CC'' r _f _ ,f -TC ADDRESS. Phone Phone # TO THE LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: Application is hereby made Ordinances relative to pr described as 4�) 3 Zoned " E:>" (1) Requestin to your Board pursuant to A a:acas Statutes 43-22 of the Code of pe ty orated at iS/�o(� Streets) , ck E. �d T C I Z u T Addn. District. Ahr, ' Aar 1241IJS.SiQAJ OA1761L -T,lE-Provisions of Section ) of that ordinance to permit /(77- J,A� (1) Requescin_Variance from ( –p 0 a ) of that the T ,ACE' Provisions of Section ordinance to permit Requesting a Variance from the Provisions of Section of that ordinance to permit as shown on the attached plan. The applicant feels that a. strict enforcement of these provisions would be a hardship because* I understand that I must notify all property owners within 140 feet of any point of the property involved herein of the public hearing according to instructions furnished with this application form and that a 11 costs incident thereto will be borne by me; and that I shall furnish to the Zoning Office not later than five (5) calendar days prior to the public hearing proof of such notification. I also understand that the required publication of legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City will be handled by the Secretary of the Board of Adjust- ment. I will submit the names and addresses o he owners of properties concerned to the Secretary of the Board of Adjustment at the t' e the u f publication is submitted to him. There ate (no) covenants on record affe.ctin s pe.rty. Phone No . j /7� 34 FILING DATE Applicant's S at.ure NOTE: This application is for a Variance from the zoning requirements based on extreme hardship caused by unusual and unique characteristics of the above described property. The Board does not have the power to change the zone classification of the property to accommodate a use nor to make any change in the provisions of the Ordinance. PC 27 250 6-28-71 NO. 484 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FILING -FEES Little Rocky Ark, f 19 ($75) Zoning Application Fee $ ($- Board of Adjustment Application Fee $ ($10 plus 500 per lot/acre)Preliminary Subdivision Fee $ ($10 plus 500 per lot/acre) Final Subdivision Fee $ ($5. plus $1 per lot) Replat Fee- $ ($20 per intersection) Street Name Signs Fee $ The above fees shall be paid to the City Collector, 1st Floor, City Hallf Address of property involved: Name of applicant: /-r>fyjd TOTAL $ r 1 DIRECTOR CJ OMNIUNITY DEVELOPWIENT DEPT. By:: 4-19-76 Item No. 16 - DETERRED MATTERS —-. Case Number: Z-2579) Applicant: B.C. Corp. and Fairmont, Inc. Location: 724 Bishop Street Description: EZ of Lots 7 and 8, and all of the E125 ft. of Lot 9, Block 12, Fausts Addition Present Classification: 1°D" Apartment District Variance: Requests a variance from pro- visions of Sec. 43-22(4D) of the Code of Ord. to permit parking in residential district Staff Recommendation: This item has been deferred by the Board several times since April, 1972. A one year deferral was granted each time and on each occasion to await information concerning the disposition of the Mills Freeway (I-630) right-of-way. This applicant has, since th.e initial request, paved and used the lots as parking. The applicant was advised by the Board that any improvements placed on the property would be placed at his risk and th.e Board did not approve of their installation. The Arkansas Highway Dept. informs us that the subject property has been appraised and, will be purchased in the near future. The staff, would at this time recommend that the case be with- drawn from further consideration and that the minutes reflect that such improvements as may have been installed were not required of the applicant and the Board does not approve their installation. We recommend this notation to clearly show in the record how the lot was improved should purchase by the state involve litigation, -- 17 - DEFERRED MATTERS Item No. 4 Case Number: Z-2579 Applicant: B.C, Corp. and Fairmont, Inc. Location: 724 Bishop Street Description: E2 of Lots 7 and 8 and all of the E 125 ft. of Lot 9, Block 12, Fausts Addition Present Classification: "D" Apartment District Variance: Requests consideration of previous variance request for parking lot in residential district, Sec. 43-22 (0) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION: THE BOARD VOTED TO DEFER THE CASE FOR AN ADDITIONAL YEAR - APRIL 1976 meeting. ( 5 ayes - 0 noes - 0 absent) Staff Recommendation: This application was originally filed in 1972 as the result of a zoning violation investigation. The property lies within the Mills Freeway right-of-way. At its meetings in April of 72, 73 and 74, the Board deferred any action on the issue for a period of one year. The owner was advised he would not have to comply with ordi- nance requirements. The State Highway Dept. has again been notified of the recurrence of this application and they reply no disposition of the property has been made. Therefore, the staff recommends an additional one year deferral of the issue. There was no one present to represent the applicant. There were no objectors present. Mim DEFERRED MATTERS: Item No. 1 Case Number: Applicant: Location: Description: Present Classification: Variance: Z�--is- 9 y Z-2579 B.C. Corp. and 'Fairmont, Inc. 724 Bishop Street The EZ of Lots 7,8 and all of the east 125 ft. of Lot 9, Block 12, Fausts Addition "D" Apartment District Consideration of previous variance request for parking lot in residential zoning district BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION: THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DEFERRED THIS CASE FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIOD. (3 ayes - 0 noes - 1 absent) Staff Recommendation: This application was originally filed in 1972 as the result of a zoning violation investigation. The property lies within the Mills Freeway right -'of -way, and at its meeting April 17, 1972 the Board deferred any action on the issue for a period of one year. T���e owner was advised he would not be forced to comply with ordinance requirements. On April 1973 the Board agnin considered the case and granted an additional one year deferral of all action. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:40 p.m. L. Dickson Flake Chairman - 10 - Don R. Venhaus Secretary DEFERRED MATTERS Item No. L - Z-2579 Applicant: Location: Description: Present Classification: Variance: B. C. Corporation and Fairmont, Inc. 724 Bishop Street The E2 of Lots 7 and 8 and all of the east 125 ft. of Lot 93, Block 12, Fausts Addition "D" Apartment District Consideration of previous variance request for parking lot in residential district The Staff's recommendation was read as follows: "This application was filed for a hearing in April, 1972, at which time the Board of Adjustment deferred action due to the property lying within the Mills Freeway right-of-way (I-630). The Staff At that time suggested a one year deferral for the purpose of Little Rock Board ;of Adjustment Minutes April 16, 1973 dteri[tiniag status of right-of-way acquisition and that property not be used in the intervening period. The State Highway Department has been contacted and their position will remain the same. They recommend no additional improvements be placed on the site as such would only increase public acquisition costs. We have been advised there are no plans to purchase this property in the immediate future." Mr. Venhaus said that notice is taken that a portion of this property will be under consideration to be required for the 8th Street Expressway and that if the applicant makes any improvements to the property, those im- provements are not sanctioned by this Board. A motion was made for one year's deferral and any improvements to the property by the applicant will not be sanctioned by the Board of Adjust- ment, which was seconded and passed. LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT M I N U T E S APRIL 17 1972 MEMBERS PRESENT arrell Dover, Chairman S. Spencer mmpton, Vice Chairman L. Dickson Flake Lawrence Woolsey Capp Shanks, Jr. MEMBERS ABSENT None STAFF PRESENT Don R. Venhaus John L. Taylor Louis E. Barber Richard Wood James Finch Floyd Villines Dorothy Riffel OTHERS Perry Whitmore, Asst. City Attorney J. Huddleston, Gazette Reporter To may Jordan, Democrat Reporter 2:00 P.M. There being a quorum present, the meeting was c alled to order by the Chairman at 2:00 P.M. A motion was made for approval of the minutes of the last meeting which was seconded and passed. Action was taken on new matters advertised for public hearing: Tract No. Z-25 9 Applicant: B. C. Corporation and Fairmont, Inc. Location: 724 Bishop Street Description: E2 of Lots 7 and 8, and all of east 125 feet of Lot 9, in Block 12, Faust's Addition Classification: "D" -Apartment District Variance: Requests (1) permission under the Provisions of Section 43.22(4)(d) of the Code of Ordinances to permit a parking lot in a residential zone; (2) requests a Variance from the Front Yard Open Space Provisions of Section 43.20(2)(f) of the Code of Ordinances to permit parking in the Front Yard Space -1- -ard of Adjustment Minutes April 17,1972 The Staff's recommendation was read as follows: "(This Variance request is the result of a zoning violation investigation.) A Variance to permit parking was suggested to the applicant rather than rezoning due to this site being located within the proposed Mills Freeway right-of-way. The Staff recommends deferral of this matter for a period of one year for purpose of determining status of acquisition of property by Highway Department." Mr. Taylor explained the recommendation'saying this would allow the applicant to continue to use the lot in its present form with no improvements, but he would be "stayed" on further proceedings by the Staff, and continue its use until some- thing is determined on the right-of-way question. Mr. .Claude Carpenter, Jr., attorney for the applicant, was present who said he did not entirely understand the Staff's recommendation to permit its use in its present firm. He indicated that they are presently parking on one lot, but the other they have not. The application is the result of the City inspector informing them that under penalty of the law parking would have to stop. He stated that they had not improved the lot according to City ordinance (the one on the corner) and the other they have done nothing to except to tear the house down that was there. "Our request is for parking space unrestricted. We will improve it according to City Ordinance and make every effort to comply with every zoning regulation and improvement regu- lation by the City. We do not want to be restricted in this property. We want to know something before the year is out. It would be to our advantage to improve the property by paving it for our tenants." Mr. Venhaus said the posture of the Staff would remain the same even in view of Mr. Carpenter's statement. He indicated that they would be able to continue to use this property for off-street parking as they are presently doing. "They would not be required to improve the property, pave it, curb it, etc. There would be no point in being evasive about it. Our position is based on the notion that we do not want to see additional value built into this property that would have to be acquired by the public when the Mills Freeway is being built, nor do we want to risk any dependence or relationship being established between the property in question and the principal structure. Therefore we would be opposed to granting a variance allowing this use of the property. Parking in a residential district is a privileged use of the property. It does require a variance from the Board of Adjustment to proceed with parking, and in view of what seems to me to be a clear public interest here our recommendation would be that we not approve that use, and that we continue this case for a year." Mr. Carpenter asked if that meant that they could not pave the parking area.. Mr. Venhaus replied that they could pave it but would do so at their own risk.."Assuming that if the Board reflected the Staff's recommendation in its decision., if they surface the parking area they would have done so without any clear definitive posi- tion from the City as to their .right to use it for off-street parking. We would not be authorizing or sanctioning the improvement of the property for parking use." Mr. Whitmore was asked to comment on this position. He said basically he agreed with the Staff's position, but the City would be in an awkward position if they went to the trouble of improving it under this type of arrangement and then the City should determine a year from now not to continue the use. -2- Board of Adjustment Minutes April 17,1972 Mr. Carpenter said the property is presently zoned."D"Apartment and asked what the City's position would be if they decided to build an apartment. Mr. Venn-aus replied that the City would refuse to issue a building permit and give the Highway Department an opportunity to purchase the land before an apartme-nt could be built. Mr. Carpenter then stated that either they are going to use it as they want to us -e it with free and unrestricted use of the property, or the City of. the Highway Department is going to purchase it, and that they would take whatever steps necessary to comply with the ordinance. The only question, he said, was whether or not they are permitted to pave it. Mr. Dover answered that the City will not stop them from paving it, but they wanted him to know that by not stopping him no legal rights would be gained. Mr. Carpenter said "in paving .it the City will not force me to put in all the requirements under the local ordinance for paving parking lots?" To which Mr. Venhaus replied that the City would not require him to comply TAth the parking ordinance. Mr. Ver -haus added that the Staff is basing its, recommendation on the fact that the land has been identified as property clearly within the proposed right-of-way of Mills Freeway and we have been assured that the Highway Department or the public will be purchasing the property within 22 years. He added that "we do not mean to be devious or complicate the matter or in any way impair the use of the property but we think there is a strong public interest here and we are trying to avoid additional expense in the acquisition of the property when it is necessary for the Freeway." A motion was made that the matter be deferred for a twelve. months 2eriod, whi.ch was seconded and passed, Mr, Dickson Flake abstained from the discussion and voting. HIGHUY DIPARTMIHT P. O. BOX 22611"' „ ; LITTLE ROCK, 72203 Little Rock Planning Commission City Hall Markham & Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas Attention: Mr. Mike Dooley Dear Mr. Dooley: April 14, 1975 Job 6873-2 Ark. I-630-2(125)141 Dennison Street -Cross Street Pulaski County This is in reference to our telephone conversation this date, concerning the status of Lots 7 and 8, Block 12, Faulks Addition to the City of Little Rock, more particularly described as 724 Bishop Street. The Department has researched its records and find that the above des- cribed property is totally within the right of way taking of Interstate I-630. If we may be of further service, please advise, Y9 ��.iy;.ryl Jaccsa/ Assistant Chie Right of Way Dvision GJ/sc THIS IS NOT A PETITION NOTICE OF HEARING TO BE HELD BY THE LITTLE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ON AN APPLICATION FOR A ZONIbG VARIANCE ROCK FILED-j�&�i4—,1970 TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST cluding owners of land lying within 140 feet df the boundary property at ��+ � 0 P S1 owned by NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON p eJ�— % T/-4 , 197 at 2:00 Po M. in the CHAMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 2nd Floor, City Hall, ittle Rock, the undersigned Board will hold a public hearing on an application filed by C Lie— ckjfie -5 requests t Sectiones — 4 to permitAiZV�f IJC (0- 5/6AN 6Wd9EIZ 711E Provisions of of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances (Sec. 43) 13, 19'20 requests .a Variance f om e T�U_1J 1Zt2 OP-(�L provisions Section L�3(� ( 02 ) of that Ordinance to permit on said lot. of requests a Variance from the Provisions of Section ( ) of that Ordinance to permit ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD at said time and place or may notify the Board of Adjustment by letter of their views on this matter. Plans and other pertinent data are available for inspectinn at the office of the Little Rock Planning Commission, Room 304, City Hall. All persons interested in this request are invited to review the application in said office and to discuss the details with the Staff. Signature o Applic: �'- ATTENTION: PROPERTY OWNERS The rules of the Little Rock Board of Adjustment require that the applicant serve notice to all parties in interest in the above matter, Your signature below simply indicates to this Board that you have read this notice announcing the time, place, and purpose of the Public Hearing on this case. THIS IS NOT A PETITION APPLICANT ADDRESS ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESSES f� hw f , C r _' PC 35 12-6-71 " 150 (USE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNATURE SPACE AND SIGN) ADDRESSES r G� I, y9v"">i��TTc ✓L �y do hereby Y certif that I have notified all r the property owners within 140 feet of the property aforementioned that the property is being considered for a zoning Variance, and that a public hearing will be held at the time and place described above. I understand that if all interested parties are not notified at least five (5) days prior to the:public hearing on this petition, then this application will not be considered by tht Board of Adjustment, and that a refiling of this case, and payument of additional filing fee, will be required. Date AD .4. Applicant April 18,1972 Mr. Claude Carpenter, 1515 West 7th Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. Dear Sir: fF cn � Re: 724 Bishop Street Parking Lot Variance On April 17,1972, the Little Rock Board of Adjustment deferred action on the above referenced matter for a period of one year. This office will advise you of the rehearing date at the appropriate time. Youss verb truly, L. E. Barber, Chief, Planning Division leb;djr POUTS SLIP Address: ( ) Your Information ) Note and Return ( ) Per Conversation ( ) Your Files ( ) Your Approval f ) Please Handle ( ) Please Advise i ) See Remarks Remarks: ��.oGoLGaC .e 7.2 -- _- -- - - -- FOLD HERE FOR RETURN --------- 4 From: Address: April 22, 1976 Mr.. Claude Carpenter ISIS West Ith Street Little Reek, Arkansas 72202 Re: 124 Bisbap Streit, vArisece to permit parting is a residential zon.ipL&trict �.Q�-z Sir: At its .aeting on April 19, 1976, the Little Rock Board of Ad jastineat ithdrew the cagtiowW matter frow further toasidoration. By this action they have Walther required, aor:*Pproved any Improvements vbieh '.ave been inetelled oa the property. Very t roily yours, iY ,`o as XV141�sari Sebdivisioa Administrator Office of Comprehensive Pla=inj Midi Gip I. Robertson, Jr., Chief Right-of-way Divisiou Ark. Stage Highway Dept., L.R. Mr. ClaWs Carpenter 1513 Wiest 7th Street Little Rock, Arkansas Yeti Sir: April 18, 1974 72202 Re- 724 Bishop Street Board of AdJustment Variance Request _ At its isactiag April 15, 1974 the Little Rock Board of Adjastmnt deterred action on ymr application for an additional one Maar period. this date hay$ not heem met as gait. This office will adaise you at the appropriate time. Yours very truly: Richard W. Wood Planning DIvIsion 1:dl ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS COPY Mr. Richard - ood City�r Pl ra x° nAy April 13, 1972 Job No. 6873 FAil No. 1-63D-2(94)140 -2(94)140 slilbur Mills Expres emy Pulaski County In relation to your telepne conversation with Mr. Glandol Jackson of this Division concexning a proposed parking lot on the corner of 8th and Bishop Streets, specifically part of Lots 7 and, 8, Block 12, Faust's Addition to the City of Little Rocks the following infozup- ation is fconished. The area is tonally within they proposed richt of vay required for constriction of Inters is Le 630, and it is anticipated that acWisi- ticn of th.'s property should be within 2 to * years. I would like to request, due to the nature of the situation, that L—prcvement of the area in gees tion for specific parking puq�oses not be dawWW of this individual. It is the Departrient6a position that continued use of these lots for parking with minimal dwelo eant v,ould be mst appropriate In order to avoid additional expenditure of public funds at the time of acquisition. e feel that the provisions of aW ordinance concerning developr_ent could be mived in the best interest of they public. If you have any cuestions concerning this matter, please contact me. GT/'e�, cat Jack Taylor Yours truly, «ard Goodhan Director ofHishvaya Gip I. Robertson,, Jr., Chief Right of1-;ay Division r(,q -z33! P. O. BOX 2261CK, 72203 Mr. Richard Wood City Planner Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Mr. Wood: HIGHWAY Upflumini April 13, 1972 Job No. 6873 FAP No. I-630-2(94)140 Wilbur Mills Expressway Pulaski County In relation to your telephone conversation with Mr. Glendol Jackson of this Division concerning a proposed parking lot on the corner of 8th and Bishop Streets, specifically part of Lots 7 and 8, Block 12, Faust's Addition to the City of Little Rock, the following inform- ation is furnished. The area is totally within the proposed right of way required for construction of Interstate 630, and it is anticipated that acquisi- tion of this property should be within 2 to 22 years. I would like to request, due to the nature of the situation, that improvement of the area in question for specific parking purposes not be demanded of this individual. It is the Department's position that continued use of these lots for parking with minimal development would be most appropriate in order to avoid additional expenditure of public funds at the time of acquisition. We feel that the provisions of any ordinance concerning development could be waived in the best interest of the public. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me. Yours truly, Ward Goodman Director of Highways Gip I. Robertson, Jr., Chief Right of Way Division GJ/eg cc: Jack Taylor 4--/D- 72 R'4/ /0�' / Z 3 � S � 6 �- �N• ` L.gY�JT fO.o 57.E ly- �. S>L\7j, 77, ti �3s .� 33 3Z .3/ zy z� 30 8 Z7 • ?� Zf Z Z3h '�. N ¢ N t^ /6 /7ZZNJ \ \ kv D IS- N � /S /4 /3 /2 P Nf V\� 2 �Nj N 4V 4-/O- 7Z - .s� I I I r g � Pi4DF�SCD AAs?/C/�/6' LAY�JT 5%9 vz Nd Y7Z4N5"5� �T/�"r!� 7 -5 -If r.a=— '"T� Fr�� - re le— �A`tr2E�C/�E aE-CI21 A P P L I C A T 1 0 N LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - FOR A ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION WAS - GRANTED - DENIED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOVING COND11-TIONS: FIRE DISTRICT CASE NO. Z Chairman Little Rock Board of Adjustment -C li,- ADDRESS. t,56 W, 7, APPLICANT- —Ad9!Q& J Phone # 27c; 4;:G K to OWNER. TO THE LITTLE ROCK BOARD 0'F Application is hereby made Ordinances relative to 0 pr described as 49et+0 /M Zoned " Z2 if 04 MIT 114 C, I ADDRESS Phone # ADJUSTMENT: to your Board pursuant zo sas Statutes 43-22 of the Code of pe 724 '�!;P.SkOP ,Ftyjocated at Street (s) %eck Z4 7- !J / Nee —TZ , Rvs-Fs Addn. District, 11 (1) Req 4:1 u8stin1MIA ArX-�f Ar - %4M41/JtA J0)J 4NO01- j of that ordinance to permit S I LAE A114 -L (2) Requestin ariance from the Z1aQJ-T YAR© 0 PEA S of that ordintance to permit Requesting a Variance from the ) of that ordinance to Une applicant feels that a strict enforcement of Pmvisions of S tion 'At 6 Z 0 -r /W Provisions of Section Provisions of Section permit as shown on the attached these provisions would plan. e a hardship because - I'. understand that I must notify all property a;qners within 140 feet of any point of the property involved herein of the public hearing according to instructions furnished with this application form and that a 11 costs incident thereto will be borne by me; and that I shall furnish to the Zoning Office not later than five (5) calendar days prior to the public hearing proof of such novification. I also understand that the required publication of legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City will be handled by the Secretary of the Board of Adjust- ment. I will submit the -names and addresses onhe owners of properties concerned to the Secretary of the Board of Adjustment at the tVMe/the .4rf5-5-f-vf publication is submitted to him. lhereV-e covenants on record affeccin" �8 perty,- q1r Jam' Phone No. 57 9 -J -4b FILING DATE Applicant's Si,-ature NOTE. This application is for a Variance from the zoning requirements based on extreme hardship caused by unusual and -unique characteristics of the above described property. The Board does not have the power to change the zone classification of the property to accommodate a use nor to make any change in the provisions of the Ordinance. PC 27 250 6-28-71 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT qUESTIONNAIRE THIS COMPLETED_ QUESTIONNAIRE MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION FOR A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE - FILL IN OR CROSS OUT WORDS OR LINES NOT APPROPRIATE. 1. I am the (owner) (legally designated agent) of the property involved in this application. 2. A Variance of this nature (has) has net) been previously requested on this property. (If Variance has been previously requested, state date: ) 3. The property is presently used forr7 4. The Variance requested is for the purpose of: (a) Adding, to existing- structure (b) New construction (c) Other (describe) 5. I (have) (have not) already contacted the adjacent property owners who might be affected by this requested Variance. 6. (He)the ) have indicated: v(a) no objection to requested Variance (b) objection to requested Variance (c) non-commital to requested Variance 7. In my opinion, the proposed Variance (will or (will not) result in an (increase) (decrease) in traffic to and from subject property. 8. There (is) (i! s not) any restriction on this property imposed by a Bill of Assurance. (Should there be one, I realize I shall be liable to the property owners having a common interest in this matter.) 9. Realizing that the Board of Adjustment considers requests for Variances where strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance causes undue hardship due to circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, I feel that my request is warranted because: �r r �f W(4- r� vrZf r �7 ave o we„ e z •�drl�Tic�, Filing Date Form BOA - 100 4-7-71 ignature of Owner oi-/y r��r --;3. c_ Co1zn 7 o 210 V14f 4f R -4;?7' SETsT- i v V r /45!5wQ14=LO7 ` ALL z . 'L SC,/' .r IU-rl -,I 1-ZY.7nV t SlJ2�-9izl�� u8T `A WAS Awl- lip X/71Z�`/LTi-,�/!fes J � �.Ii-y fa��l • 1 3 i f �' ST 712 5) -S-Z7-11-7/.SfMX In �' ST 712 5) -S-Z7-11-7/.SfMX April 170 1973 Mr. Claude Carpenter 1515 Wiest 7th Street Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Sir. Re: Z-2579 Board of Adjustment Variance at 726 Bishop Strut for r arki lot. On April 16, 1973 the Little Rock Board of Adjustment deferred action on the above referenced matter for an additional one year period. This office will advise you of the rehearing date st the appropriate tiara. Yours truly, Richard W. stood Planning Division RWW:dl