Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-02512 ApplicationAPPLICATION FOR REZONING TO THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION: FIRE DISTRICT NO.� P,C„APPROVED: , 19 P.C'CRj2ff:E`$ : 19 0 BD . OF D IR . APPROVED: r i C , 192L BD a OF DIR,--DAB ` , 19 ORDINANCE N0, 5 -53 ZONING CASE N0. Z Filing Date: Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Board of Directors of Little Rock, Arkansas, through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas law on City Planning, Act 186, of 1957, Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance No. 5420 as amended, petitioning for a rezoning of the following described area: Ld& 6iNLWM Subdiyis feta of .r3 . Ir 6 of U n.* rd , ,flu -is su1milid Si on a thS F.aat W2 IM 2/4 IM 1/4 Seation '6s Towmhlp i North t;ange tsest ftl"ki Comid s Arkansas. Title to this property is vested in: jMy,, r*_ r ;- rrt �. , ��._, _' •. 4 e) It is desired that be reclassifified IIBB the boundaries showL. on the District Map be amended and that this area from the present "" District to District. Present Use of Property: s,.B■UMM- aa'] o P a t Desired Use of Property:_-,� (4LexP,,, c) (there are no) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of this.property. The filing fee, required by Ordinance No. 9455 will be paid at the City Collector's Office on the filing and acceptance of this application by the Zoning Office, It is understood that notice of the public hearing hereon before the Little Rock Planning Commission will be published at least 15 days prior to said hearing in a daily newspaper as required by Act 186 of the 1957 Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of said Ordinance, and that notice of preliminary hearing before the Commission (PC -18) must be circulated by the applicant to all other parties in interest, including owners of land within 200 feet of the boundary of the area under consideration as required by the rules of the Commission, and that the cost of these notices shall be borne by the applicant. DATE: % / / Form ZA 5-4-71 (6 0) (OWNER) �• , ADDRESS: 303 ga ri PHONE : _22#—U32 THIS IS NOT A PETITION Filed",t 1 , lg11 t� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST, including owners of 1 d lying W1 h"11 200 feet of the boundary of property at owned by_. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a rezoning of the above described property requesting a change of zone classification from District to "�� ✓l�,j District by amendment of the Little Rock code of Ordinances (Chapter 43) has been filed with the Little Rock Planning Commission, City Hall. A Public Hearing on said petition by this CoMiss" w'il be held in the Board of Directors' Chamber, City Hall on 19_7,,/_at tv-00 P.M. Z:06 ALL PARTIES -IN INTEREST MAY BE HEARD at said time and place or may notify the Commission by letter of their views on this matter. ATTENTION: PROPERTY OWNERS The rules of the Little Rock Planning Commission require that the applicant for rezoning serve notice to all parties in interest. Your signature below simply indicates to the Commission that you have read this notice announcing the time, place, and purpose of the public hearing on this case. Address e_Y� z! �- e c-) 1) l -1 13 Ct© 6-16-71 - 200 - - THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE MUST ACCOMPANY THE REZONING APPLICATION (Fill in or cross out words or lines not appropriate) 1. I am the (owner) (1g 1yx ) of the property involved in this application. 2, (a) (b) The rezoning of this property has been requested before (Mm.) The rezoning of this property was requested previously (date) changing it from District to District 3. For what purpose is property presently used: )no) Residentiml - Reutxl. 4. The intended use of this property is : E1, !quiet Business. 5. I (do) (do not) propose use of the property as it is (exclusive of minor repair) if rezoned. (I i, s se i Di ion of t• ` - ) (no) 6. If rezoned: (a) I have an immediate builder -) - (no) (b) Plan to develop in the future - (yes) (no) i (c) Plan to sell after rezoning - (yes) k 7. The proposed rezoning: (a) Is compatible with the established land -use pattern of adjacent properties in the immediate area (yes)" (b) Would create an isolated oned lot or tract incompatible with adjacent zoned property J (no)L.- 8. no)!r8. The basic land -use pattern of the immediate area has changed recently - (yes) - 9. The proposed zoning: Will Not'� (a) (waw (x111xnot), in my opinion adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood (b) :(WIIU (will not), in my opinion, adversely affect the value of adjacent properties (c) *dli* (wiles t),in my opinion, deter the improvement or development of adjacent property (d) * (will not),in my opinion, adversely affect the character of the immediate area X 10. (a) The general character of the immediate area is "built up" yes; (b) The general character of the immediate area is r 11. In my opinion, the rezoning of this property (wil-T:j (will not) result in an (increase) J"gxxot&g:J in traffic incident to the intended use of the property. 12. I have parking spaces sufficient to comply with requirements of the City Ordinance under my present zoning classification (yes) :(rrvi 13. If property is rezoned: (a) Sufficient parking is now available (yes) (b) The required additional parking will be provided (yes) (xvi 14. There *ax) (is not) any restriction on this property imposed by a Bill of Assurance (Should there be one, I realize I shall be liable to the property owners having a common interest in this matter.) Signature of owner, or _ Date: L4J / / I _� I 5-4-71 PC 150 0 TO ALL PARTIES IN I of property `' a� owned by THIS IS NOT A PETITION Filed !- ,19� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION 14 ST, includiEg owners of,lid lying wit4in 200,feet of the boundary NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a rezoning of the above described property requesting a change of zone classification from District to District by amendment of the Little Rock code of Ordinances (Chapter 43) has been filed with the Little Rock Planning Commission, City Hall. A Public Hearing on said petititin by this Commission will be held in the Board of Directors' Chamber, City Hall on 19at P.M. ALL PARTIES -IN INTEREST MAY BE HEARD at said time and place or may notify the Commission by letter of their views on this matter. V? Little Plock, Arkansas September 1, 1971 The Little Rock Planning CO-11missiou Room 304, City mall, Little Rocks Arkansas Gentlemen: i am submitting, for your kind consideration, an application for rezoning- a resi fential lot at 4934 ";jest . arkham Street to E1 quiet Business. Legal deseriptica and other pertinent information are disclosed in the attao' ed Forma yA and PC. Also attached is a copy of the "evr Rezoning Plan Near 1,11arkham and University. You wall please note that three lots guest of my property, in the same block, have been rezoned E1 quiet Business and are being used in that classification.. you Till also Dlease note that my property is one of the lots indicated by the I>la=- ing Conmission to be rezoned to El quiet Business. Rezoxing to be approved upon individual application and payment of filing fee. In ray opiason the "rezoning would be compatible with the established land -}ase Dattern of adjacent properties in the immediate area; would not adceraely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; and, in fact, ,r,-ould enhance she value of adjacent properties. I believe others in the block are desirous of rezoning and selling their properties as soon as buyers can be found.. p Frankly, I think the time -has come, oral I .-uld like to'seq the emi=-=ng lots in this block an dept 14.Tarkham, between Notth Monroe Aind y-orth Jackson Streets, retomed to El quiet Business and built up in that class - If icatiou. 1 am sure it would be much more attractive and more beneficial, tax prise, to tine City. I shall be very grateful for your efforts in this matter and will cooperate in every way 3 can* Res Of fully, Edna T. Crain (lrs. J. L-) 303 So. T:edgewood Rd. P. S. Also attached are three copies of a recent plot plan prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor shoving all existing improvements at the tt-e of filing. Survey performed huguat 31, 1971. Little Rook, Arkansas September 27, 1971 Mr. Richard Woods, Little Rook Planning Commission, Little Roek, Arkansas. Re: Additional Form 200 Dear Mr. Woods: On September 14th I mailed to you Form 200 on which I had obtained signatures of property owners within 200 feet of my property at 4934 West Markham Street. On further investigation to ascertain if I had contacted all property owners within the prescribed 200 feet, I discovered that owners of two pieces of property in the first 100 block of 11orth Monroe should be contacted since their property is within 200 feet of mine. The owners are: Mir. H. G. Bozarth at 122 No. Monroe, and Mr. Louis East at 118 No. Monroe Street. I have obtained their signatures on the attached Form 200 and I shall appreciate very much your making this Form a part of my petition on fila in your office. Thank you. Encl. Ford 200 Yours very truly, t Edna T. Crain (Mrs. J. L.) 303 So. Wedgewood Rd. 4 1 THIS IS NOT A PETITION Filed ! r2_ ~! , r 19 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEr.^,.RTNG BEFOx..1 THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING CGI'VIISSION TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST, including owners of la d lyi g within 200 feet of the b9pndary of property at owned by Ci•.r-, jlYt�es. , C3 . ►_ } NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a rezonipg of the above described property requesting a change of zone classification from District to District by amendment of the Little Rock code of Ordinances (Chapter 43) has been filed with the Little Rock Planning Commission, City Hall. A Public Hearing on said petition by this Cocwissk_on wl,ll be held in the Board of Directors' Chamber, City Hall on 19 %/ at P.M. ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST MAY BE HEARD at said time and place or may notify the Commission by letter of their views on this matter. ATTENTION: PROPERTY OWN—ERS The rules of the Little Rock Planning Commission require that the applicant for rezoning serve notice to all Parties in interest. Your signature below simply indicates to t:,e Commission that you have read this notice announcing the time, place, and purpose of txe public hearing on this case. Address APPLICANT COMPLETE REVERSE SIDE 6-16-71 - 200 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL FR 4-4311 Planning Division LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Permits & Inspections Division ]2201 Traffic Division r-1_ C4.6'" Dear 10-�(=7( Public Works Real Estate Re: Case No. Z-� Address} `j J aMA, This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a change in zoning from Z District to E-- ( District, the follow' g action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on (a) Denied (b) Approved as applied for Approved - provided: Rezoned to Deferred An ordinance effecting this rezoning will (wt) be submitted to the Board of Directors for its consideration at its meeting Yours very truly, LITTLE ROCK PLANNING.COMMISSION Don R. Venhaus, Secretary 5-7-71 250 Her THE KROGER CO. 1302 PIKE AVENUE • NORTH LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72114 February 22, 1972 Mr. Lou Barber City Hall Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Mr. Barber: Enclosed are three copies of the development plan for our store at Cantrell and Taylor Streets, Little Rock, Arkansas. Would you please have approved and return one copy to this office. A letter is being forwarded to your office re- garding the sewer easement at this location. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours truly, Tommy iter Real E' ate Manager TL/srb Enclosures cc: Mr. Gene Pfeifer III Mr. Gaylon Boshears Form 710-28A Little Rock, Arkansas September 14, 1971 !,,r. Richard Toods, Little Rock Planning Commission, Little Rock, Arkansas. Re: Completed Form 200 Bear Sir: I am attaching hereto Form 200 on which I have obtained signatures of property owners within 200 feet of my property at 4934 Iffiest LParkham Street for which I have requested rezoning from "B" Residenee to "El" Quiet Business. You will please -note that I have signatures of all property owners in Brickton Place, North of my property; and, with oae exception, signatures of all property owners within the block between North I--.onroe and. North Jackson Streets. The one exception is I.;rs. HE. Fay H. Jones who mems the properties at 4908, 4910, and 4928 West Harkham Street, which are rental properties. Yesterday, September 13, I went to the office of 1.1r. James H. Penick, Sr., brother of Mrs. Jones, inasmuch as I was advised that he was in charge of her properties, to obtain his signature on the Notice of Public Hearing* He informed me that Mrs. Jones is traveling abroad and will not return to the St$tes until early in October. He also stated that he did not want to sign the ?otice for her - he preferred that she do that herself. IiI.1hich, of course, she cannot do since she is presently in Turkey. From conversations with her years ago and with other concerned persons more recently, it is my opinion that would not have any objections to the rezoning - rather, would approve. Therefore, since -1 feel that I have complied with all requirements prescribed in the Instructions I am submitting the attached complete& Form 200. Thank you very much for your very kind assistance in this matter. Yours very truly, � `�' i Edna T. Crain f-, rs. J. L. } 303 So. Wedgewood Rd. Property Owners Name: Address I hereby certify that I have notified all the property owners within 200 feet of the property aforementioned that the property is being considered for rezoning and that a Public Hearing will be held at the time and place described above. I understand that if all interested parties are not notified at least five (5) days before the public hearing on this petition, then any petition which may be granted by the Planning Commission will automatically become null and void. Cj Date: f /77/ Applicant a Planning Commission Minutes October.? 1971 --- v000w Tract No. 4 Z-25 - 4934 West• Markham Street From: "B"- esidence District To Quiet Business District The Staff's recommendation was read as follows: "The Staff recommends approval of this application. The proposed "E-1" zoning complies with .the land -use plan adopted by the Planning Commission :-for this area of West Markham Street." There were no objectors. A motion was made for approval of the application, whic4 was seconded and passed, NO.j CITY OF LITTLE ROCK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FILING FEES Little Rock, Ark a 19 (t75) Z A U $25) oning pplication Fee Board of Adjustment Application Fee. $ p $10 $!10 plus 50¢ per lot/acre Preliminary Subdivision Fee $5 plus 50� per lot/acre Final 'Subdivision Fee $ plus $1 per lot) Replat Fee $ $20 per intersection) Street Name Signs Fee $ TOTAL The vON a e paid Y for lst. oor, City H SER on DIRECTOR COM IT' JONES By: Addre [--)ICK CMP-EC-T-gEfnvolved : ; Name of applicant: E. V .Crain 303 So. Wedgewood. lid., Little Rock, Ark. 72205 Mrs. H. Fay H. Jones Rivereligf Aps.rtments Little Rock, Arkansas RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED N 2 W. D to I REUTLING R A Q . o..._� rz r STF,M L _ �© I CAX TT E AVE 1' 1 A[#Tf N 6 .� 4934 w. Ocfi 7171 mo; A rte: F.- I N a 'PL—rift l 5 WAR MEMORIAL PARK EI ARKANSA )%,C) -50..0, 6' .,-A*) v b M O 4 V C `\ 0 8 C. LOWE, JA. P,EGISTE.RED LAND SURVEYOR BT&TMK OMS j ARKANSAS No. 12 I l SIRNATUPE This is to certify that we have surveyed Lot 5, Bank's Subdivision of Block 6 of Howard Adam's Subdivision of the E*, NIS, NE -1. of Section 6, T -1-N, R-12 W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. All corners were set or found as shown and were established in accord- ance with the existing monuments and apparent property lines of the area. Improvements are as shown on the plat, For: Mrs. J. L. Crain RWIP-AAI"A. Ass Date: August 31, 1971 Scale: 1"' = 30' 50. i R 1 o rh 11V4ft5T MAk2k19,4M ST. ASf�ho/�' PI?ven7enf Certificate # 12 8A • ARKANSAS GA7.L17T', Sun.. Feb. 4, 1968. Thames Threat 11 " To Landon Stirs Demands LONDON (UPI) — Demands are growing here for govern- ment action to remove what many fear is a grave threat. that London could experience a flood disaster akin to that which devastated Florence. The potential villain is the River Thames. The city is sinking and Thames' t i d e s are getting ibigher. The Greater London Council and a group of members of Parliament have warned that unless some sort of barrier is built across the Thames, the danger of flood remains greater than in 1953 when 307 persons were killed, 32,000 made home- less and $120 million damage was caused on the English East Coast. , : The Thames division police said recently: "It is likely that, sooner or later, unless some- thing is done to remedy the situation, large areas of London will be devastated when tht Thames bursts its banks." The GLC reports that London sinks about 13 inches every cen- tury. Flood defenses built lower down the Thames after the last disaster have channeled the threat further upstream to Lon- don. The coincidence of very high tide, strong gale and heavy fresh water flow — perhaps raising the Thames by an extra 10 feet — might not happen in 100 years, experts agree. They also agree it could happen twice in one week. According to estimates, if the coincidence ever occurs more than 1 million London residents will be in a 45 -square -mile area below adequate. defense. This :lrr.k N"Ne as 'I .!r m ' .Film fr4ii 1ou5 fifili Ili 1■lruri■...ro ti •- r rrrrrr5o■1■. It■ ow■■,uu5 ■■,■:u 10 o,■i,rr ■ r■ uool■■1u1■i■r■1irr,r■■■1r■irlri■ „ 11■i■1■■■,■■i■,■■■■i■ir■■■1,■i"kir.. w w lir.rr, r r rrrlr r rnaf r■ ur r5 rf iiw■f ■ 1 r1■1i■■■iii■■■■.}■■■■rr■i■■ii■iii■ �lf■a■Rf.rou■■ rf' f1■■■u1■uf■r■ ■ 1,■■■■■a■1f,if■■■��■■■■■■■s■■irf■iir Now IiiRt +■�■+� Ing.■■■1.i■..... .R. R...akrlffff5■ I® �liiiif., ffff■fRff■fff5■■1■5R■f■■■■■fit■0■■■ ■.y R F.' 1 R ■■f.0,0,i +f1■i■u■■i■ilsi■■lus■■■iw1R■iR.w... Cih 1 �1 laii'7i lit.f■kRiiiiRl,iiRRRR■f1■fR,f■f■■■■■' 1H■■■ �f�■o1e�■oi���ou�■oa���ou■o■ iirrr. ��e"-z1oi-1i■f-■■-pii—■i------- ,-ton aa■k■ifl:: 1 .111:1500,:21-11 1160m.■■moi■:. fnl 501110 ..■cr1.f■R.,■■.uaik:■:■i■i,,,,,r■I I■■r ■■ikli■ ms�r■■rr..�i1■1si1■■�r-■,■rl lia■ - -- irr.lrll in■rr.o i1lv.aii 1■,I 1'I■11 i lit■■■■■i li1■ua111i ieiifi>;i 11 LM oru■il • silr■ui -w.oe,s,m� urrrr.ii rovnmoa:>:� I iiiil��i■i. i� ST V,itct "TJ; .Hoar. To S E "5-1' QuIrr > USINUSS ZGNINO 3;S150 ocy_ 'ro aE "a" APAK"Wr 2091NO wr To -a W f Gj1 1 Wt? FAMR.Y ZONE " s »rAtbltn A/ •ra611 -00% Fulbright Group Seill 3 -year Le., EXIsTltiO 7A1Ji1'Y0r fC! Gazette Washington Bureau LEE ST. WASHINGTON from disastrous Ile 1rirr Z■R1a1r�t':-=i1iri�■i55�i� witnesses - , r Senatere the Committee t rf■15u1i■!�f! T.! $ _ LAFA-Ve tT R William Fulbright (D' and four constituent sFriday in •support of , tion of laws affectinf ftq=Aer - $ from disastrous Ile 1rirr Z■R1a1r�t':-=i1iri�■i55�i� witnesses - , r Senatere the Committee t rf■15u1i■!�f! t 1IOwhich both the -lend, A New Rezoning Plan Near Markham and University, borrower know to be i✓ of fulfillment. Emery The Little Rocq Planning Commission adopted this rezoning plan Thursday for the area bounded by West Markham, Monroe and Lee Streets and University Avenue. The plan does not rezone the property—it only specifies what the Commis- sion will approve if property owners want to, apply for rezoning. The plan was adopted because of increasing requests for D apartment and C two-family zonings in the area. The letters on the blocks indicate the existing zoning. Unshaded blocks were recommended to be left in their present zonings, the heavily shaded blocks were recommended to become C A Trembling Princess Benedikte Marries a German in Copenhagen COPENHAGEN (M -- 'The first trip out of Italy since his Carl Gustaf of Sweden, and •ide's hands trembled and she December 14 f 1 i g h t from Princesses Margrethe of Den - as two minutes late, but DenGreece, looked on. (mark and Beatrix of the Nether ark's PrincesEkte - Benediduly k u., a.urt-+., " +n,. i..t �,a rt.�,_ lands. J Kludge Enters Innocent Plea In Bribe Case RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (m — .ate Supreme Court Justice two-family, the checked blocks were recommended to become should run for at D apartment zones and the dotted blocks were recommended years, unless the fat fies a desire to retic to become E1 quiet business zones. earlier." Other witnesses in McKinnon, a Manil man; Earl 'Wildy, a farmer; Jim Pullian Jury Acquits Accused Killer • farmer; Gary Jug works with the County poverty p Burdette, and farrr Victim's Kin Shout With Ragechants from Geonbarna. The Arkansans tc PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A jury's decision that a young they had suffered fr, Indiana man was innocent of a 21 -month-old murder charge secutive bad wea has brought cries of anger from the victim's family. which has left then - "I don't care about nothing. I banks, feed and sec- s n�me �r j hardware companies - the Agriculture Dep make emergency it Esru L i maturities of three yc 8 the borrower choose., term. Fulbright told the E t $ he was not quarreling; F :: service Arkansas f & ceive from the Depar irlf= E I He said, "I merely what these farmerz T. They say that three STi►Tr are more r l HI= t_Tti OF -FT. permit them to to plan -.2>. ations without an t 1IOwhich both the -lend, A New Rezoning Plan Near Markham and University, borrower know to be i✓ of fulfillment. Emery The Little Rocq Planning Commission adopted this rezoning plan Thursday for the area bounded by West Markham, Monroe and Lee Streets and University Avenue. The plan does not rezone the property—it only specifies what the Commis- sion will approve if property owners want to, apply for rezoning. The plan was adopted because of increasing requests for D apartment and C two-family zonings in the area. The letters on the blocks indicate the existing zoning. Unshaded blocks were recommended to be left in their present zonings, the heavily shaded blocks were recommended to become C A Trembling Princess Benedikte Marries a German in Copenhagen COPENHAGEN (M -- 'The first trip out of Italy since his Carl Gustaf of Sweden, and •ide's hands trembled and she December 14 f 1 i g h t from Princesses Margrethe of Den - as two minutes late, but DenGreece, looked on. (mark and Beatrix of the Nether ark's PrincesEkte - Benediduly k u., a.urt-+., " +n,. i..t �,a rt.�,_ lands. J Kludge Enters Innocent Plea In Bribe Case RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (m — .ate Supreme Court Justice two-family, the checked blocks were recommended to become should run for at D apartment zones and the dotted blocks were recommended years, unless the fat fies a desire to retic to become E1 quiet business zones. earlier." Other witnesses in McKinnon, a Manil man; Earl 'Wildy, a farmer; Jim Pullian Jury Acquits Accused Killer • farmer; Gary Jug works with the County poverty p Burdette, and farrr Victim's Kin Shout With Ragechants from Geonbarna. The Arkansans tc PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A jury's decision that a young they had suffered fr, Indiana man was innocent of a 21 -month-old murder charge secutive bad wea has brought cries of anger from the victim's family. which has left then - "I don't care about nothing. I banks, feed and sec- s n�me �r j hardware companies -POST OFFICE DEFAirTmElfT OFF;CIAI_ VLISiNESs LO C. 44 C5 Z POSTMARK OF DEI..tV1;RIMG OFFICE Print your name and restrict delivery, or to shown on this receipt, '_rio seen Surnmeci ends vrocle. PPJIALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAym.--7 Or vosTA GE. Svc address below. If you want To have the address of delivery RETURN check block(s) on orher side, and 2mch this card to bod, of TO 5 -CR F1fn>r 'C'D �o. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL -30c (plus postage) TO e a 6�� tE @SR POSTMARK OR DATE AND N0. P.O.. STATE AND OE DPTIgNAI SERVICES Fill!DDt71UNAl FEES t Shows to whom and date delivered............3 t r RETURN • RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ......--.... 6 where Aeiiveretf 3 �� 2. Shows to whom, state and .. SERVICES With delivery to addressee Only ............ 8s DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ... ...... ..................... --- ............... —"- (extra fee required). .......................».. ....... PS Farm NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— 3800 MAIL (See ocher side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL GPO: 19700-397-404