Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-02503 ApplicationAPPLICATION FOR REZONING I Z\ r TO THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION: FIRE DISTRICT NO. P.C.APPROVED: , 19 P.C.DENIED 19 BD.OF DIR, APPROVED: , 19 BD.OF DIR. DENIED 19 ORDINANCE NO. ZONING CASE N0, Z C2_. Ute' Filing Date: f , Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Board of Directors of Little Rock, Arkansas, through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas law on City Planning, Act 186, of 1957, Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance No. 5420 as amended, petitioning for a rezoning of the following described area: "A". The North 118 Feet of the East 165 feet of the El-,. NE4 NE4 NE4 Section 351, T -2-N, R -13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. "B". The West 162.5 feet of the E., NE4 NE4 NE4 Section 351, T -2-N, R -13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. "C". The East 175 feet of the North 237.2 feet of the W, NE4 NE4 NE4 Section 35, T -2-N, R -13-.W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. "D". The East 165 feet of the South 560 feet of the Title to E i NE4 NE4 NE4 Section 353, T -2-N, R -13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. It is de s area be reclassifified from the present A " S .n ale ^arnily District to " I" ����c�u l District. Present Use of Property: • 3 All r,P;1� F-'Lmilu Desired Use of Property: "F" Corwmercial (there are no) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of this property. The filing fee, required, by Ordinance No, 9455 will be paid at the City Collectors Office on the filing and acceptance of this application by the Zoning Office. It is understood that notice of the public hearing hereon before the Little Rock Planning Commission will be published at least 15 days prior to said hearing in a daily newspaper as required by Act 186 of the 1957 Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of said Ordinance, and, that notice of preliminary hearing before the Commission (PC -18) must be circulated by the applicant to all other parties in interest, including owners of land within 200 feet of the boundary of the area under consideration as required by the rules of the Commission, and that the cost of these notices shall be borne by the applicant. DATE: October 4: 1073 Form ZA 5-4-71 (600) (OWNER) or (AGENT) '14raines Lard ?z ADDRESS: 911 North Street Little :tock, Arkansas 72201 PHONE : 374-0251 RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS 911 North Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 374-9251 January 10, 1972 Mr. Richard Wood Little Rock Planning Commission City Hall Little Rock, Arkansas Re: Mississippi -Iowa Streets Zoning Amendment Dear Richard: Please withdraw the following property from my zoning application that will come up for the Planning Commission Meeting on February 3, 1972. "A1° - The North 118 feet of the Ea:3t 165 feet of the EZ NEI NEI NEI Section 35, T -2-N, R -13-W; "B" - The West 162. 5 feet of the E NEI NEI NEI , Section 35, T2N, R13W; "C" - The East 175 feet of the North 237. 2 feet of the W; NEI NEI NEI, Section 35, T2N, R13W, all in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. Part "D" in the rezoning application should be amended to include only three lots instead of the seven as shown in the application and the survey. The proper legal description should be: Part of the EI z NE4 NEI NE4 of Section 35, T2N, R13W, in Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Commencing at a point 25 feet West and 335 feet North of the Southeast corner of said EZ NE4 NEI NEI for the point of beginning; thence North, parallel to East line thereof, a distance of 225 feet; thence West, a distance of 140 feet; thence South, parallel to East line of said E2 NEI NEI NEI, a distance of 225 feet; thence East a distance of 140 feet to the point of beginning. Please note further that the "F" Commercial ,request, should be changed to "E-1" Quiet Business on these three lots and that all the previous descriptions be withdrawn, except with that shown in the paragraph above. Thank you. Sincerely, RAINES LAND COM Y/REA ORS LAW OFFICES SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS HENRY E. SPITZBERG H. MAT RICE MITCHELL STEELE HAYS BERESFORD L. CHURCH, JR. JOHN P. GILL JOSEPH W. GELZINE W. CHRISTOPHER BARRIER JERRY D. JACKSON OF COIINSEL BROOKS HAYS Miss Jane Czech City Clerk City Hall Little Book, Arkansas Bear Mise Janes PYRAMID LIFE BIIILDING LITTLE Rocx,ARxANSAS 72201 501) 376-3151 August 1pr 1972 I have been advised by my calientsts a Mr, and Mrs„ F. M. sates that they do not wish to pursue the appeal now pending before the Little boom Board of Di- rectors concerning the rezoninq of 7640 Iowa Strept_o Little mak. Consequently, I would appreciate your removing the l-aattar from the Board's agenda. Thank you. Very truly yours,, John P. Gill JBCtrb cc; a !,z . cion venhaus city Mali, Little Mock, Arkansas Mr. and Mrs. F. B. Bates 7600 Iona Little Book, Arkansas Z; {t�4kwN6►5.• DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL FR 4-4311 Planning blvision LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS Public Works Permits & Inspections Division ' Real Estate Traffic Division 72201 Dear Re: Case No. -Z- A5 03 / Address 600 =- ,,e s This isgo advi fou that in co ection with yourpp, ication for change in zoning from C'Wr E- fJ District to :_rC`1la v'YtOi' ,C, (AA District, the following ction�' a taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on V Cil (a) Denied (b) Approved as applied for (c) Approved - provided: (d) (e) (f) Rezoned to Deferred '�f 3 -jj 7 An ordinance a tingth}s—ronirtg wi].(will not) be submitted to the Board of Directors for i seder s meeting Yours very truly, LITTLE ROCK PLANNING.COMMISSION Don R. Venhaus, Secretary 5-7-71 250 225-6629 I L6 C&AORI jgCkGGJS 7700 Ohio Street 4� 311 North Elm Street i. yy LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72207 November 1, 1971 Members of the Staff Little Rock Planning Commission City Hall Little Rock, Arkansas Gentlemen: Re: A request by Raines Land Company for a change of Zone Classification from "A" One Family District to "F" Commercial District of property owned by various individuals in the 1800 block of Mississippi Avenue and the 7600 block of Iowa and Ohio Streets. Rather than take up your time with a telephone call or office visit, it was felt that a letter outlining our opposition to the proposed change would be more appropriate. No doubt the Anthony School will be one of the most vitally affected, inasmuch as the entire block of land in the proposed change borders the school campus on the east, a distance of 663' from Iowa to Ohio Streets. We feel that Commercial Zoning adjacent to a school would be extremely detrimental to the environment and atmosphere so necessary to learning. Both Iowa and Ohio Streds are very narrow and woefull-,/ inadequate to carry the existing traffic. ;Iowa Street being only 16' to 18' wide wits places where automobiles cannot pass. It is realized that traffic is increasing everywhere, but unless and until these streets are widened, any increase in traffic would be intolerable. In an attempt to assit in alleviating the problem, a paved driveway 663, long was constructed across the entire length of school property from Ohio Street of Iowa Street. Thus establishing a one way traffic pattern in to and out of our school campus. You are, of course, aware that should the 1800 block of Mississippi Avenue be changed to "F" Commercial, the tre ndency would be for strip Zoning commercial along the street and furtherencroachment into a fully developed one family area. We cannot speak for other property owners in the area, however, it appears to us that the 1800 block of Mississippi might be suitable for "E-1" quiet zoning and property fronting on Iowa and Ohio Street suitable for low density apartments. In other words, we recognize that a property owner is entitled to the highest and best use of his property as long as it does not detract from the neighborhood. Respectfully submitted. Anthony S of By Allen D. Anthony, Pre,�i nt November I4, 1971 LITTLE BOCK PLANNING COMMISSION MENlBER.S City Hall Little Rock, Arkansas Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of a Petition signed by forty-four (44) persons in the general neighborhood area of the proposed re- zoning of Iowa Street adjacent to Mississippi and Mississippi from Iowa South to Ohio. These signers have expressed their disapproval of the rezoning proposal but because of other commitments could not appear be- fore this Meeting today. Please accept this Petition as our plea against the rezoning of the property in question. Sincerely, Mrs. G. K. Waters 7800 Bonnie Brae Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 Atch. 0 We the undersigned object to the rezoning pf ronerty on Iowa. street belong- ing to F. E. Rates and Ruth 'lustison, for the following reasons. It creates a traffic problem because of the narrow street which is already inadequate for (resent usage. 4Ze a sewage problem also exists which is inadequate for the homes it serves. It would depreciate surrounding property and set a precedent for other undesirable rezoning. V / ! 'J ( i .� MISSISSIPPI PROJECT OWNERS: Parcels "A" & "B" Parcel "C" 7619 Iowa Parcel "D" REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS F. E. Bates (1824 North Mississippi) Ruth Mary Tustison 1800 North Mississippi 1802 North Mississippi 1806 North Mississippi 1808 North Mississippi 1810 North Mississippi 1812 North Mississippi 1814 North Mississippi Adolph Cernin Bob Adams Sharp M. Langley Joe M. Holladay Vernon Dowdy William Bradley Nora E. Rowland a THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE MUST ACCOMPANY THE REZONING APPLICATION (Fill in or cross out words or lines not appropriate) 1. I am the " (legally designated agent) of the property involved in this application. 2. (a) The rezoning of this property has been requested before�afe (b) The rezoningof this ro w s cue ted reviouslt a �� P Y � � P y(changing it fro rs District to hoeo District �1 3. For what purpose is property presently used: a �Ml �,LZH�• 4. The intended use of this property is 5. I 4W (do not) propose use of the property as it is (exclusive of minor repair) if rezoned. (If you do, have you discussed this with the Building Inspection Division of this Department (yes) (no) 6. If rezoned: (a) I have an immediate builder - {Jj - (no) (b) Plan to develop in the future - (yes) .' (c) Plan to sell after rezoning - (yes) JW 7. The proposed rezoning: (a) Is compatible with the established land -use pattern of adjacent properties in the immediate area (yes) AW41 (b) Would create an isolated zoned lot or tract incompatible with adjacent zoned property " (no) 8. The basic land -use pattern of the immediate area has changed recently - (yes) - 9. The proposed zoning: (a) A40W (will not), in my opinion adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood (b) �W) (will not), in my opinion, adversely affect the value of adjacent properties (c) A$O*) (will not),in my opinion, deter the improvement or development of adjacent property (d) (will not),in my opinion, adversely affect the character of the immediate area 10. (a) The general character of the immediate area is (b) The general character of the immediate area i cant land 11. Inm o inion, the rezoning of this property (will) �) result in an (increase). jQ%) in traffic incident to the intended use of the property. 12. I have parking spaces sufficient tocom ly with requirements of the City Ordinance under my present zoning classification (no) 13p If property is rezoned: (a) Sufficient parking is now available (yes) (b) The required additional parking will be provided (yes) AW 14, There JM (is not) any restriction on this property imposed by a Bill of Assurance (Should there be one, I realize I shall be liable to the property owners having a common interest in this matter.) RNWE'25 LAMO Date: cUL 4 wit 5-4-71 PC 150 Signature of o r ga author zed agent RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS TO RAINES LAND COMPANY You are hereby authorized to act as our agent to obtain a higher zoning classification on our property with the street address of 1802 N. Mississippi Street, Little Rock, Arkansas with the legal description to be within the zoning application. We further understand that there will be no expense to us for the preparation of the rezoning application; filing fee; postage; or any other expenses related to a rezoning up and through a hearing by the City of Little Rock, Arkansas Board of Directors. This authorization is in effect until the zoning appli- cation is approved or denied by the City of Little Rock, Ark- ansas Board of Directors. WITNESS my hand and seal this the day of ,1971. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED 0 J LND COM NY y 41 RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS TO RAINES LAND COMPANY You are hereby authorized to act as our agent to obtain a higher zoning classification on our property with the street address of 1806 N. Mississippi Street, Little Rock, Arkansas with the legal description to be within the zoning application. We further understand that there will be no expense to us for the preparation of the rezoning application; filing fee; postage; or any other expenses related to a rezoning up and through a hearing by the City of Little Rock, Arkansas Board of Directors. This authorization is in effect until the zoning appli- cation is approved or denied by the City of Little Rock, Ark- ansas Board of Directors. WITNESS my hand and seal this the V-2- day of S'4ii ,1971. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED RAN ,AND COMP i by; RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS TO RAINES LAND COMPANY You are hereby authorized to act as our agent to obtain a higher zoning classification on our property with the street address of 1808 N. Mississippi Street, Little Rock, Arkansas with the legal description to be within the zoning application. We further understand that there will be no expense to us for the preparation of the rezoning application; filing fee; postage; or any other expenses related to a rezoning up and through a hearing by the City of Little Rock, Arkansas Board of Directors. $ . WITNESS my hand and seal this the', -Z? day of .ti ,1971. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED RAINLAND COM b -&Z�f � /7q NO. 0030 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FILING FEES Little Rock, Ark. ,19 ($75) Zoning Application Fee $� $25) Board of Adjustment Application Fee $ $10 plus 50� per lot/acre] Preliminary Subdivision Fee $ $`10 plus 50� per lot/acre) Final Subdivision Fee $ $5 plus $1 per lot) Replat Fee $ $20 per intersection) Street Name Signs Fee $ TOTAL $ The above fees shall be paid to the City Collector, 1st. Floor, DIF By: 19TI Address of ptbperty involved: -- f Name of apri RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS TO RAINES LAND COMPANY You are hereby authorized to act as our agent to obtain a higher zoning classification on our property with the street address of 1810 N. Mississippi Street, Little Rock, Arkansas with the legal description to be within the zoning application. We further understand that there will be no expense to us for the preparation of the rezoning application; filing fee; postage; or any other expenses related to a rezoning up and through a hearing by the City of Little Rock, Arkansas Board of Directors. This authorization is in effect until the zoning appli- cation is approved or denied by the City of Little Rock, Ark- ansas Board of Directors. WITNESS my hand and seal this the -7-� day of 311971. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED RAIN LAND COMPANY Y %t RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS TO RAINES LAND COMPANY You are hereby authorized to act as our agent to obtain a higher zoning classification on our property with the street address of 1812 N. Mississippi Street, Little Rock, Arkansas with the legal description to be within the zoning application. We further understand that there will be no expense to us for the preparation of the rezoning application; filing fee; postage; or any other expenses related to a rezoning up and through a hearing by the City of Little Rock, Arkansas Board of Directors. This authorization is in effect until the zoning appli- cation is approved or denied by the City of Little Rock, Ark- ansas Board of Directors. �r WITNESS my hand and seal this the day of c ACCEPTED AND APPROVED RAINS AND CSMPA b y '`rI RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS TO RAINES LAND COMPANY You are hereby authorized to act as our agent to obtain a higher zoning classification on our property with the street address of 1814 N. Mississippi Street, Little Rock, Arkansas with the legal description to be within the zoning application. We further understand that there will be no expense to us for the preparation of the rezoning application; filing fee; postage; or any other expenses related to a rezoning up and through a hearing by the City of Little Rock, Arkansas Board of Directors. This authorization is in effect until the zoning appli- cation is approved or denied by the City of Little Rock, Ark- ansas Board of Directors. WITNESS my hand and seal this the day of 1- ,1971. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED w L 4 ab Planning Commission Minutes June 1, 1972 prior to the October meeting. The applicant made application for the November, 1971 meeting for rezoning of a larger tract to "F" -Commercial, which included that in the previous "E- Apartment September application. The Staff recommended denial of this application basically for the reasons of incompatibility of land use and the inadvisability of development of commercial on Mississippi due to the excessive grade in this area. At the November meeting the applicant again requested a deferral until the February 3, 1972 meeting.) Prior to the meeting on that date applicant withdrew application entirely. The application now filed for consideration encompasses only the 2.5 acres lying west of and immediately behind the houses along Mississippi Avenue. The Staff recommends denial of this application as it is felt that an "E-1" use of the land lying between residential property on Mississippi and Anthony School adjacent on the west would be highly inadvisable. It would be incompatible with adjacent properties. It is felt that low density multifamily "MF 6" development would be appropriate and a practical use of the land." Mr. John P. Gill, attorney for the applicant, F. E. Bates, was present. There were approximately 12 objectors present, two letters of objection filed, and a petition having 30 signatures in opposition filed. Mr. Gill stated that this particular tract is at present vacant. The property is part of a tract which includes the southwest corner of Mississippi and Iowa zoned "E-1" which is also owned by Mr.Bates to the east. This request is to permit the use of this entire tract including that "E-1°" corner for the Arkansas Allergy Clinic offices. There are at present single-family houses along Mississippi Street, and one house to the west of the tract on Iowa Street, and the Anthony School and houses across Ohio Street. The proposed use contempates leaving the south half ("A"-Single- family) ""A"-SIngle=family) vacant for future development as the owners have no plans for that particular portion of the tract at present. Although there is not any immediate need for that zoning as such, it does pose somewhat of a question in the proposed use of the land if the doctors intend to develop it for a clinic, it would seem that they should have the assurance that for future expansion that property could be used for "E=1" and the only way it could be assured is to zone it at this time. Mr. Gill filed a petition signed by property owners along Mississippi and Iowa Street indicating no objection to the use of "E-1"' on the entire tract. Mr.Wesley Stevenson, 1720 Mississippi, was present in opposition and filed a petition having 30 signatures of adjacent property owners objecting to the rezoning. He also stated that the drainage situation is very critical at this location. Mr. M. E. McGahan, 7603 Ohio, who lives directly across the street from this property was present in opposition. The suggestion that the south half be retained as ""A"-Single4 family zoning was acceptable to him, and the north half be rezoned to "E=1" Quiet Business District as requested. Mr. Allen Anthony representing the Anthony School at 7700 Ohio Street, was present and expressed no objection to the Allergy Clinic, but would not want "E-1" zoning on the entire tract. He later modified his statement to approve "E -l" in the 1500 block and the remainder "A"' -One -family to be a buffer zone between the commercial property and "A" zoned property. Mrs.G. K. Waters, 7500 Bonne Brae, was present in opposition stating that in her opinion the entire tract should remain "A" single-family as the streets in the area are narrow, particularly Obio, that the sewer is not adequate now and the situation -3- Planning Commission Minutes .lune 1,1972 would be worsened. Mr. Venhaus responded saying that because of the importance of this property and its relationship to Mississippi Street and that whole area, if the north half of this property cannot be reasonable used for "A"-Sing.le-family, then realistically the south half cannot be either, so all we are doingis deferring the problem. "I don't think that anybody would expect the south half of this property would be used at some point in the future for "A" Si.ngiemfamiiy. If it cannot be used now it certainly won't be a better piece of property for "A" -Single family its the future, and it won't be maintained in perpetuity as a buffer strip, I am sure, if the value of the land is as high as it is suggested to be. So I think that is a problem that might simply be deferred to another time and place. Again I want to remind you that the application as filed places these frontage properties on Mississippi in your judgment in such a situation as to become a very strong argument for "'F`' Commercial zoning. You would bane, if this application is approved "F" Commercial zoning on every corner on Iowa and Mississippi except the southwest corner which the applicants own and does not propose to develop for professional office use. That leaves it in perfect set up .for "F11 - Commercial zoning, if not through the City then through the Court. Once that corner property is zoned "F" -Commercial it appears to me that we have jeopardized that entire strip of houses on the west side of Mississippi.,, Mr. Gill stated that the fact that the streets are narrow (Ohio and Iowa) would make it necessary to .improve them however the property is improved whether it be single- family residential or any other use, from the property line out to the existing street which would entail a large expense. "Because of that expense and because the property owner is entitled to use the property for the highest and best uses, it seems to me that there should be a consideration certainly on the north part of the property for "E-118 use where it ,joins the existing "Eml'" which the Bates owes. With reference to the south part of the tract, the suggestion was made by the Planning Staff that 'IMF 6.P would be appropriate on the south portion, and after conferring with my clients their position is that they will accept your best judgment insofar as that lower portion is concerned. I suggest that if the Planning Commission feels that the south 300 feet of that tract deserves some classification anther than "Eel'" that it be given the classification as recommended by the Staff." Mr. Gill said the south 300 feet would provide ample room for the development of the north portion of the tract to permit park- ing that they propose. The parking is to the south of the 'Nailding. Mr. Putnam asked Mr. Gill if he were amending the request for "B-111' Qu ie t Business for all the property except the south 300 feet of the tract. Mr. Gill replied that the owners would like "E -i" on the whole tract, but this would be an appropriate method of handling the ownership because it esn't put a limitation on the expansion of the clinic, but there has been a suggestion by the Staff for some other type of classifica= tion, but he would not like to be the one to set it. "If there is to be ones, I would like to request that it be done by the Commission on my petition as it stands, and again recall that the Staff has recommended "MF 6" on that southern portion." Mr. Venhaus corrected him saying the Staff recommended '"MF 6" for the entire tract. Mr. Putnam then restated his motion that all except the south 300 feet of subject tract be zoned "E-1" Quiet Business a to the south boundary line of Lot C. He re- phrased his motion to rezone all of the tract to "E-1" Quiet Business with the exception of that portion lying south of an extension of the south line of Lot C running westward, which was seconded. Mr. Venhaus at this point said that the motion as stated does not satisfy the concern that the Staff has expressed throughout. "It places "'E-1" on theinterior tract behind the single-family dwellings on Mississippi. It certainly enables them to rezone their property '�E-1" on demand. I think it sets up the corner property at Mississippi and Iowa for an "V_Coamtcercial application. By this action I believe we in effect are committing all those frontage property on -4- Planning Commission Minutes June 1, 1972 Mississippi �,o a change in zoning to "E=1" and possibly "F" -Commercial."' The: motion failed for lack of sufficient affirmative votes. Mr. Putnam asked Mr. Kemp if this killed the modification to which he replied "yes, but the application has not been acted on yet." The Chairman asked &.Stevenson if this modification was acceptable and he replied that he would go along with it although he was not happy with it. Mr. Carroll Foley was in the audience saying that he had bought a house on Mississippi for an investment and he objected to the rezoning of half of the subject property, and -in his opinion that area needs to be developed in its enti.retyp otherwise the "A" -Single-family on Mississippi would probably want to get 'IF" -Commercial zoning. Mr. Wickard said he wanted to go on record of sharing Mr.Venhaus concern about the southwest corner of the intersection of Mississippi and Iowa. "I am daiinitely against any IT"- Commercial on that portion of the block or anywhere else on that block. Of course, it is possible to go to Court and override the Commission, but I would like to state that I am opposed to that. I would like to make the same motion in essence that Mr. Putnam made that this property be rezoned - the north so many feet, but up to the property line to an extension of the south boundary of Lot C, and the balance remain "A" -Single-family. The motion was seconded. Mr. Gill then asked to address a comment to what seems to be the Staff's concern about that particular corner e that at some future date it may change classification to #T ". "I am fully aware that when the property is classified, it is classified for whatever use, is permissible there. I am also aware that by the time an individual places an expenditure of funds and erects a doctors' office, which is an "Eml"" use, the chances of that doctors' office requiring "V-CoTroiercial are nonexistent, and chances of vacating this property for some "F" Commercial use are likewise rather remote. It just does not seem realistic that in the future a recommendation or request for "F"0 would be made. We have submitted this application in toto. We have asked for a full development plan for this particular plat as an "E=1"" use. I am not unwilling to try again for a motion by the Commission as to what might be done on the north half, but that failing that some type of concurrence of the members of the Commission it would be proper to look at the whole applicatlzn. I would like for you to vote on the petition as filed." Dr. Miller asked if he would be in order to move for a thirty day deferral with instructions to the professional staff that they completely review the area between Iowa and Ohio m all property facing Mississippi back to the Anthony -School, and property north of it with the idea of making a total zoning recommendation that would be in keeping with the good of the neighborhood and community. The Chairman agreed that this might be well taken, and Dro Miller made a motion to defer for thirty clays action on this application and the professional staff be instructed to make a study and recommendation on that area. The motion failed for lack of a second. Mr. Gill countered that the Staff had apparently made a study of this area, and considered the property along Mississippi and made their recommendation, and it would seem that the Staff's recommendation is in a posture so that we could go forward with it. We do need to get it resolved today, he said. Mr. Putnam then made a motion to rezone thenorth 325 feet "E=1" Quiet Business, which was seconded but failed for lack of sufficient affirmative votes. -5- Planning Commission Minutes June 1,1972 Mr. Gilmore then made a motion to adopt the Staff's recommendation, which was seconded, but failed for lack of sufficient affirmative votes. Mr. Gill stated that they filed an application to rezone that entire tract. ""We did it for the purpose of using the north part of it for immediate development and the south part for future development. The owners of that particular piece of ground is entitled to use it for its highest and best use. That particular piece of ground has a drop on the front end in excess of 20 feet. It is a rough piece of ground and any development on that tract is going to require enormous expenditure of mosey whether for single-family or a doctors' clinic. The only highest and best economic use of that property is going to be for a doctors' clinic, or for some mother type of clinic or use that would go in an "E-1" District. If you cannot economically justify the development of that property for single family use - that is the present use - because of the street grades that would be requested on ""MP" use o you can't economi- cally do that either. You can economically place haat building where it is placed on the plan and provide parking on both the south and west, and to that end we Mould like to ask that you give favorable recommendation to the "E-1" request. There is really no other good use of that property bearing in mind that the Bates already own a piece of property zoned "QEal" to the east, and for that reason they have requested that the entire strip that is behind the row of houses on Mississippi be rezoned to "E=140 use. I would request that you grant this particular petition as it has been presented to you. - When asked about the status of the motion made by Mr. Gilmore, Mr. Kemp replied that the proper approach is to act on the petition and not the Staff's recommenda- tion. Mr. Wickard added that basically his opinion was that the entire block needs to be rezoned "E -l" ultimately. Mr. Gill said "it is .important that we bear in mind that these are two obligations Of this Commission, (1) the highest and best use of this particular property upon which an application is made; (2) the obligation for the proper planning in the community. This tract is under one ownership now and will remain in one ownership if rezoned. I have spoken to you about what is the highest and best economic use of this ground rough terrain s expensive to develop m its inaccessibility. This is already single- family. I would ask you again to permit it to be developed for its highest and best economic use and permit it to be developed under "E -l" classification. In reply to this statement, Mr. Venhaus said "if Mr. Gill is going to talk about the highest and best use, and the obligation of the Planning Cosmmis.ion, I feel obliged to point out to you haat it seems completely foolish to me to construe a piece of property for its highest and best use - to take a piece of property that has no adjacency - no frontage on a major street, that is separated from a major street by existing "QA..- Si-ngleafamily dwellings, and to argue that the highest and best use for that property is "E-1" professional office when it lies between two developed strips of "A" -Single family property. I dont think the highest and best use has any application here at all. The Planning Commission has an obligation, of course, to render a judgment that they think is best for the benefit of that area." At this point the Chairman (Mr. McLean) asked Mr. Wickard to take the chair, and. he (Mr. McLean) made a motion that this matter be deferred for a period of thirty days to the regular July 6th meeting "as we are down to a bare minimum of a quorum". The motion was seconded and passed. -6- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL Public Works Planning 1111"'1010nieian LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS Real Estate Perm, ts & Inspections Division Traffic Division 72201 Re: Case No. Z J (� Address Dear This is to advise yo hat, Vi connection with your applic.,ation f a -chpg42in zoning from /'1 District to Districtthe following actio was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on (a) .I: (c) (d) f (e)' (f) Denied Approved as applied for Approved - provided: Rezoned to Deferred to An ordin ecting t - rezoning will (will not) be submitted to the Board of Director r i consideration at its meeting Yours very truly, LITTLE ROCK PLANNING 'COMMISSION Don R. Venhaus, Secretary. 1-10-72 250 6. Z-2503 - 7600 Block between Iowa and Ohio Streets - F. E. Bates From: "A" -One -family District To "E-1" Quiet Business District The Staff's recommendation was read as follows: "(After a lengthy dis- cussion, this case was deferred by the Commission at last moath's meeting.)" Case History: This case file has a long history of changes and deferrals which was reported last month in the Staff recommendation. The Staff- restates its recommendation of denial of this application. It is felt that an "E-1" use of the land lying between residential property on Mississippi and Anthony School adjacent on the west would be highly undesirable and inadvisable. Such a development would be incompatible with adjacent properties. In our opinion, low density multi -family ( MF 6 ) development would be appropriate and a practical use of the land." Mr. J. H. Carmical, Attorney, was present representing objectors to "E-1" and asked that the petition be denied and property left as is. Mr. Wesley Stevenson, 1720 Mississippi, was present in opposition and asked for denial of this application and preserve the residential character of this neighborhood. Mr. M. E. McGahan,- 7603 Ohio, said he would like to see the neighborhood left as it is -- a quiet residential area. The Chairman asked for those who opposed to please stand. There were 12 people. Mr. John Gill, Attorney, representing the owners said the sloping area would require a.great deal of expenditure to develop to any use. "E-1" Quiet Business would be favorabl-eHe pointed out that the property would be more difficult to use as ''A" family.` He said that "E-1" is compatible to the rest of the community. Since adjacent property is also owned by Bates and already zoned "E-1" the owners want all property zoned alike. Neighborhood has enough apartments already. Motion was made for denial of the application, which was seconded and passed. 4 a Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, n ,OmMUNI in pjE:PR July 19 1972. Little Bock Planning 00 --mission city Hall Little Hock, Ark. Gentlemen: I have attended each meeting of the Planning Commission when the rezoning of the Iowa -Ohio strip of land has come before the Commission. Nothing that the owner offered has convinced se that changing the zoning of the property involved to business property would be in the best interest of the community. In view of the strong opposition of the surrounding property owners, I feel that the present zoning should be upheld rather than resort to !spot soning". The owners right to put his property in use is not questioned, but don't othero have rights too? And we who oppose the change bought our hoses under the impression that we would not be subJected to f*rther zoning chanpes. Sincerely, 22. Le -T7 - E -RS OF � 0 L V �,C- ' jr, July 4 Mr. Russell L. McLean, 8hairMan Planning Commission Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadwgy Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Sir: This letter refers to property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, *Nest of Mississippi St, up for rezoning from A-1 to B -l. The inevitable result of this rezoning would bd gradual rezoning of property to Business and Commercial creeping into our neighborhood. We would like to keep this property A-1 residential as this has been our home for ten years. T4ank you for consideration in this case. Sincerely, Roy H. Sherd DF -PA r Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P.•Gill, representing Mr. -and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to M-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to F�1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, JP 1 Jul, 3, 1972 Four Ohio Cove Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassify ing the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property, Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr,'and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to F-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr, Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to M-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to T-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, 2xt, a..4 h'i-'-z'j a-, { rV i Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mf. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr, and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask'_.that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property.' Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, r !v Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr.' Russell L.' McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr.' John P,' Gill, representing Mr."and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area; Reciassifying the zoning from A-1 to F-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property." Thank you for your consideration of this matter.` Sincerely, 790 k Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City, Hall Markham at Brbwdway Little Rock, Arm nsas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr, and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the appli- cation. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your,, -consideration of this matter. Sincerely, JJ) 4 r �:1 Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to T-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, '- 71 B Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs.' Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business.' As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I as?r'.hat you consider denial of the application.` The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, --C�idf �vrl l\lTl� C)EV s Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Air. Russell L." McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Rates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa -and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application,' The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ��77% DEPARTMENT Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 'ncerely, r" `77/�� DE?AR"i"MENT July 11 1972. Little Rock Planning Commission City Hall Little Rock, Ark. Gentlemen: I am particularly disturbed abput the suggested rezoning of the strip of property between Ohio and Iowa just West of Mississippi. Those of us who own our own homes in this area are very reluctant to see this happen, for many reasons. The need to put this land to use is obvious, but to me, business is not the answer. Judging from the measurements of my own lot -which is quite adequate -- why cannot five or six lots be plotted for split level, moderate priced homes? A private drive from Ohio to Iowa would give access. The houses could be back to back, or backed to the houses on i�dississippi. Houses are being built on much worse terrain every day, and here the residential area could be maintained intact. Would not the proposed rezoning to business b --"spot zoning"? Sincerely, Y 2 J-0. h1V1UNi s Y DEVEL0Fj''t: N �. DEPARTIVIENT t Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of lfississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask thkt you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property.' Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, r July 11 1972. Uttle pock Planning Commission City Hall little pock, Ark. Gentlemen: I am particularly disturbed about the suggested rezoning of the strip of property between Ohio and Iowa just pest of Mississippi. Those of us whf7 own our own homes in this area are very reluctant to see this happen, for many reasons. The need to put this land to use is obvious, but to me, business is not the answer. Judging from the measurements of my own lot -which is quite adequate - why cannot fire or six lots be plotted for split level, moderate priced homes? A private drive from Ohio to Iowa would give access. The mouses could be hack to back, or backed to the houses on bUssissippi. Houses are being built on mach worse terrain every day, and here the residential area could be maintained intact. Would not the proposed rezoning to business be"spot soning'"? A Bineerely, OFPAF July 1, 1972. Little Rock Planning Commission City Hall Little Rock, Ark. Gentlemen: I have attended each meeting of the Planning Commission when the rezoning of the Iowa -Ohio strip of land has come before the Commission. Nothing that the owner offered has convinced me that changing the zoning of the property involved to business property would be in the best interest of the community. In view of the strong opposition of the surrounding property owners, I feel that the present zoning should be upheld rather than resort to ?spot zoning". The owners right to put his property in use is not questioned, but don't others have rights too? And we who oppose the change bought our homes under the impression that we would not be. subjected to firther zoning changes. Sincerely, k July 3, 1972 7823 Ohio Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to S-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, V 'D .01V1i'1rt NiTY DF-FIAFZTMF—t\'T July 3, 1972 Five Ohio Cbve Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Rassell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City gall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iona and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E -i would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter, Sincerely, July 3, 1972 Light Ohio Cove Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Wississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, :DWAU �� RTtv'�� ��r'ivl�i�!"C July 3 , 197Z- Three Ohio Gbve Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr, Russell L, McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mrs John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to %1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, duly 3, 1972 One Ohio Cove Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr, John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sin Ile rl NIFEN mill A J, "-* , / Jwz-ar 031, 7 1 —1 - [16 2 --- 7 pp si 4 f 13 BONNIE BRAE 1. =:�o sd 5c. , '547, 5,, sar 50v J, "-* , / Jwz-ar 031, 1 —1 - [16 2 --- pp 4 14 13 BONNIE BRAE 1 12- 6 7 9 110. J, "-* , / Jwz-ar 031, All .2 MOM v I a CA 14 F G HONEYSUCKLE 14 - INDIAN TRAIL 15091 LTIL� 1401 1 39's DICKSON DR - 40L — - --E-- -'-;A 410 Z 2503 7&00 awd. I OW& jun 1972 WALE 1"-& 200 JAY SMITH Rp / A� SUBDIVISON TANG 2 EY17F.5Z Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr, Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City mall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Mr. John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to R-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E_1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL Punning ""vi'"" LITTLE ROCK> ARKANSAS PublicWorks Per -Its & Irsj,CetRealEste Traffic Divsion 72201 Re: Case No. Z - `` (A,4 1 I �- Address _,_k ; f Vis' _ _ -- Dear This is Ao advise you that -n connection with your application for change in zoning from . t ;J District to c.vc.G• iv2� Distri ",' the fol�ng action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on may. A Denied Approved as applied for Approved - provided: Rezoned to Deferred to An ordinance effecting this rezoning uCTt (will not) pe submitted to the Board of Directors for its consideration at its meeting'f7-2 Yours very truly,,. LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION Don R. Venhaus, Setretary, 1-10-72 250 APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION: FIRE DISTRICT NO. 6 P.0 , 19-- P.C.DENIED , 19- 2-Z BD.OF DIR. APPROVED: , 19 BD.OF DIR. DENIED , 19 ORDINANCE NO. ZONING CASE NO. Z Filing Date: Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Board of Directors of Little Rock, A33kansas, through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas law on City Planning, Act 186, of 1957, Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance No. 5420 as amended, petitioning for a rezoning of the following described area: 11 of.E, NES NES NES Section 35. Towhship 2 North, Ranke 13 West , EXCEFT beginning 25 teet West and 2U feet North of Southeast corner of said Ez NE4 NE4 NE4 Section 35 and run thence North, parallel to the East line of said Ek NE4 NE4 NE -14 a distance of 540 -feet. 1 thence West 140 feet; then _e South S40 feet - 140 140 feet to beginning. Title to this property is vested in: F. E. Bates and Tola S Bate It is desired that the boundaries shown on the District Map be aT nded and that this area be reclassifified from the present " lel " dd J District t)6X and If A " single family District. To "EPI Quiet Business Present Use of Property: - Desired Use of Property: doctors clinic :C�FaXX) (there are no) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of this.property. The filing fee, required by Ordinance No. 9455 will be paid at the City Collector's Office on the filing and acceptance of this application by the Zoning Office. It is understood that notice of the public hearing hereon before the Little Rock Planning Commission will be published at least 15 days prior to said hearing in a daily newspaper as required by Act 186 of the 1957 Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of said Ordinance, and that notice of preliminary hearing before the Commission (PC -18) must be circulated by the applicant to all other parties in interest, including owners of land within 200 feet of the boundary of the area under consideration as required by the rules of the Commission, and that the cost of these notices shall be borne by the applicant. SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS Attorneys for (OWNER) F_ E. Rates and Folz S_ pates or (AGENT) B ' John P. Gill ADDRESS :g_ 2.5_1! rnmid T.i f_Q_ R1 d a _ Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 DATE•.PHONE FormZA 6-4-71 (600) Planning Commission, City of Little Rock Mr. Russell L. McLean, Chairman Little Rock City Hall Markham at Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Gentlemen: Imo°, John P. Gill, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bates, recently applied for rezoning of property between Iowa and Ohio Streets, west of Mississippi, from A-1, residential, to E-1, quiet business. As an owner of property near that for which rezoning has been requested, I ask that you consider denial of the application. The current status of the neighborhood is that of a quiet, residential area. Reclassifying the zoning from A-1 to E-1 would detract from this status and could cause the surrounding residential property to deteriorate in value as residential property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE MUST ACCOMPANY THE REZONING APPLICATION (Fill in or cross out words or lines not appropriate) 1. I am the (c) (legally designated agent) of the property involved in this application. 2. (a) The rezoning of this property has been requested before (b) The rezoning of this property was requested previously (date) changing it from District to District 3. For what purpose is property presently used: Sin le family residence 4. The intended use of this property is: 5. I (dW (do not) propose use of the property as it is (exclusive of minor repair) if rezoned. (If you do, have you discussed this with the Building Inspection Division of this Department (yes) (no) 6. If rezoned: _ (a) I have an immediate builder - (yes) (no) (b) Plan to develop in the future - (yes) (no) (c) Plan to sell after rezoning - (yes) IM 7. The proposed rezoning: (a) Is compatible with the established land -use pattern of adjacent properties in the immediate area (yes) OW (b) Would create an isolated zoned lot or tract incompatible with adjacent zoned property (yM (no) 8. The basic land -use pattern of the immediate area has changed recently - (yes) - () 9. The proposed zoning: (a) (W) (will not) in my opinion adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood (b) (X) (will not) in my opinion, adversely affect the value of adjacent properties (c) () (will not) in my opinion, deter the improvement or development of adjacent property (d) (TIM) (will not) in my opinion, adversely affect the character of the immediate area 10. (a) The general character of the immediate area is "built up" 11. In my opinion, the rezoning of this property M) (will not) result in an (Y,p_) (decrease) in traffic incident to the intended use of the property. 12. I have parking spaces sufficient to comply with requirements of the City Ordinance under my present zoning classification (yes) (nYA 13. If property is rezoned: (a) Sufficient parking is now available (yes) () (b) The required additional parking will be provided (yes) (no) 14. There (W (is not) any restriction on this property imposed by a Bill of Assurance - (should there be one, I realize I shall be liable to the property owners having a common interest in this matter) SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS Attorneys. -'for;, F. E. Bates and To la S . Be to s-� -Sl n�Lture of Owner, or legally Authorized Agent. John P. Gill Date: April 28,, 1972 825 Pyramid Life Building 12-6-71 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M 433 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FILING -FEES Little Rock? Ark, 19� i ($75) Zoning Application Fee $ ($25) Board of Adjustment Applic on Fee $ ($10 plus 50¢ per lot/acre)Pre12- nary Subdivision Fee $ ($10 plus 500 per lot/acre) F1 --hal Subdivision Fee $ ($5. plus ($20 per $1 per lot) Replat,$ intersection) Stre"e-t'Name,4'ign5/ Fee $ $ TOTAL $ r A. 'S The above 'fee ] �F paid to the City C ollec , t L,. 1st F10or:.0ityHa 1 FFAA�� DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT* By: 0't Address of property involved; = f Am'® Name of applicant: Tract No. 4 - Z-2503 7600 Iowa Street From. "A" -One -family District and "E-1" Quiet Business District To ° "F" -Commercial District The Staff's recommendation was read as follows. "A portion of this property was involved in a request for "E" -Apartment and "E-1" filed for the September Planning Commission meeting. The applicant requested deferred of thirty days which was granted by the Commission. On October 4th., prior to the scheduled re -hearing, the applicant withdrew the apartment portion of the request. The "E-1"1_lot was rezoned on September 20, 1971. The applicant has submitted by this application all of the former "E" - Apartment request, the "E -l" lot and the adjacent lots along Mississippi Avenue which have not been previously considered on -a rezoning request. The Staff recommends denial of this application, An "F" -Commercial development at this location would be highly undesirable and incompatible with the sunrounding land uses - Anthony School is adjacent on the west, practically new homes on the north, and a well established and stabilized residential development on the south. Tanglewood apartment complex lies across the street to the east and the topography physically separates the Tanglewood commercial complex lying across the street to the north portion of this property. It is the opinion of the Staff that the -location and topography favor single-family development of the property similar ,to other single-family development in this area. The tract is sufficiently wide enough to permit construction of a street between Iowa and Ohio with the lots rearing onto those facing Mississippi which are occupied by well maintained and high quality single-family homes. The sharp grade of Mississippi at this point does not favor commercial develop- ment on the east side of subject tract, An "F" -Commercial development of this property would be an undesirable land use adjacent to Anthony School and not in the interest of public safety." Mr, Samuel Raines, the applicant, was present. He stated that this property abuts Anthony School, but this is a private school and can't be classified as a public school. It is a business -type operation, he said, and can be a buffer to the property to the west. Mississippi Street has been widened and is now an arterial street and this is the reason for the application for "F" -Commercial zoning in order to obtain prices for the property owners in this area that they would like to have. "In its present use as residential property, this would not -be justified as far as price is concerned. There is a definite hazard to those living on Mississippi." Mr- Raines pointed out commercial and apartment uses in the area on Bryant and Cantrell Road and stated that since there is a considerable amount of "F" -Commercial in the area, his firm has undertaken to obtain the best price possible for the land owners. He asked if it would be possible to ask for another deferral of the application in order that he could obtain the Staff's recommendation for the highest and best use of this property that would be economically feasible. The Chairman pointed out to Mr. Raines that there are about 44 objectors to this petition from property owners in the vicinity, Mr. Walker suggested that this location would be very difficult for commercial development because of parking problems, but a well-planned multi -family unit might be a better use of the ground than some form of commercial use, aad even better than a quiet business use. Mr. Raines asked that the case be deferred until the February,1972 meeting, and a motion was made to that effect which was seconded and passed. Planning Commission Minut October 7,1971 -100 DEFERRED MATTERS 1. Z-2 - Bates and Ruth Tustisan - 7600 Iowa Street From: "A" -One -family District To • "E"-11 artment District This case was withdrawn by the applicant Prior to=the'meeting. RAINES LAND COMPANY 911 North Street Little Rock, October 51, 1971 Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Little Rock, Arkansas / REALTORS Arkansas 72201 (501) 374-9251 Re: Zoning Case Z-2503-7600 Block Iowa Gentlemen: Please withdraw the above styled rezoning application from the meeting on October 7, 1971; and withdraw completely from consideration by the planning commission on this particular application. After many hours of study and research, we feel that there is a higher zoning classification needed for the proper development of this property; and therefore, we have filed for a much higher zoning classification which was done on October 4, 1971. Thank you. j Very truly yours, RAINES LAND COMPANY/R RS W. amuel L. Raines Planning Commission Minutes = September 2 1971. V` Tract No. 7 -2503 7600 Block Iowa Street From: "A" -One -family District To : "E" -Apartment District The Staff recommended denial of "E" -Apartment zoning, and recommended '-MF 6 -- Multi -family District instead. The applicant, F. E. Bates and Ruth T.ustison requested a deferral of thirty .days to the October 7th. meeting,and a motion was made to this effect, which was seconded .and passed. Mrs. G. K. Waters, 7800 Bonne Brae Drive, was present and stated that this is a single-family area nine years old and is a well kept neighborhood. The zoning to apartment use would depreciate their property values, would add traffic to neighborhood streets which are narrow, and add to sewer problems which now exist, she said. She 1A was told that the matter had been deferred to the next regular meeting,at which time her objections could be heard again. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL FR 4-4311 Planning Dlvislon LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Public works Permits a Inspections Division Real Estate Traffic Division 72201 Re: Case No. Z- 5 ©� Address ! 0 0 ' Cakwxj Dear This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a change in zoning from District to r District, the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on r, (a) Denied (b) Approved as applied for (c) (d) i (e) (f) Approved - provided: Rezoned to Deferred I I,A -rr1 t en C--7 S?.� gVS5"T 4� A PLl CA47 An ordinance a ec re (will not) be submitted to the Board of Directors for its `d ae on a me Yours very truly, LITTLE ROCK PLANNING.COMMISSION Don R. Venhaus, Secretary 5-7-71 250 RAINES LAND COMPANY / REALTORS 911 North Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501j 11CL 374-9251 August 27, 1971 Mr. Louis Barber Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Little Rock, Arkansas Re: Zoning Case Z-2503-7600 Block Iowa Dear Louis: Please defer the above styled rezoning application until the October 7, 1971 meeting. The reason for this request is that I will be in Chicago next week and will not have ample time between now and September 2, to see if your recommendations will fit our proposed use of the property. Thank you. Sincerely, L��; amuel L. Raines RAINES LAND COMPANY/REALTORS 3c APPLICATION FOR REZONING FIRE DISTRICT N0, d P . C , A.PPROVED : ' 19 P,C.DENIED 19 BD.OF DIR, APPROVED: , 19 BD,OF DIR. DENIED , 19 ORDINANCE N0, TO THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION: ZO ING CASE N0, Z �� Fkcko- August 2, 1971 Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Board s of Little Rock, Arkansas, through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas it Planning, Act 186, of 1957, Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of the Litt�e Ordinance No, 5420 as amended, petitioning for a rezoning of the folkcv ng described area: The West 162.5 feet of t -4-114.1 €C-13-YV, me past 1ee Sectio 35, 2-- 1C� Yi Title to this propertyisve.st NE -'4J, S9,etion 35, oun y r ansas AND I�Oet of the 3� 4 -NE -14, k, Pulaski County, Arkansas : F. E. BATES & MXRYXXNN RUTH MARY TUSTISON It is desired that the boundaries shown on the District Map be amended and that this area be reclassifified from the present " A If Single _Family District to " E--" Apartment District, Present Use of Pro ert : "A" Single Family Desired Use of Prope.rtv: "F11 CIM XRXOO (there are 'no) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of this property. The filing fee, required by Ordinance No, 9455 will be paid at the City Collector's Office on the filing and acceptance of this application by the Zoning Office, It is understood that notice of the public hearing hereon before the Little Rock Planning Commission will be published at least 15 days prior to said hearing in a daily newspaper as required by Act 186 of the 1957 Acts of Arkansas and Section 23 of said Ordinance, and that notice of preliminary hearing before the Commission (PC -18) must be circulated by the applicant to all other parties in interest, including owners of land within 200 feet of the boundary of the area under consideration as required by the rules of the Commission, and that the cost of these notices shall be borne by the app tcant. AMiIE L L (0 oil or A�l (AGENT) 911 North Street ADDRESS: _r-,t:L3e Ro,k, Arkansas —72201 DATE : 'August 2, 1971 PHONE _ 374-9251 Form ZA 5-4-71 (600) THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE MUST ACCOMPANY THE REZONING APPLICATION (Fill in or cross out words or lines not. appropriate) 1. I am the (legally designated agent) of the property involved in this application. 2. (a) The rezoning of this property has been requested before AgeA.W. )no) (b) The rezoning of this property was requested previously (date) changing it from _ District to District 3. For what purpose is property presently used: f� /�, lv 4. The intended use of this property is : /�� /�%MoMAIM 5. I Affo not) propose use of the property as it is (exclusive of minor repair) if rezoned. (If you do, have you discussed this with the Building Inspection Division of this Department (yes) (no) 6. If rezoned: (a) I have an immediate builder - (yes) - (b) Plan to develop in the future - (yes) �! (c) Plan to sell after rezoning - (yes) 7. The proposed rezoning: (a) Is compatible with the established land -use pattern of adjacent properties in the immediate area (yes) 4* (b) Would create an isolated zoned lot or tract incompatible with adjacent zoned property 4W (no) 8. The basic land -use pattern of the immediate area has changed recently - (yes) - 4W 9. The proposed zoning: (a) Mlwrpry) (will not), in my opinion adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood (b) j� (will not), in my opinion, adversely affect the value of adjacent properties (c) ) (will not),in my opinion, deter the improvement or development of adjacent property (d) () (will not),in my opinion, adversely affect the character of the immediate area 10. (a) The general character of the immediate area is "built u " (b) The general character of the immediate area i< vacaxat lan 11. In my o inion, the rezoning of this property (will) ­o0hdh&2fta6-Ar_ result in an (increase) in traffic incident to the intended use of the property. 12. I have parking spaces sufficient toly with requirements of the City Ordinance under my present zoning classification 1W (no) 13. If property is rezoned: (a) Sufficient parking is now available ( (no) (b) The required additional parking will be provided (yes) ►1► 14. There 40 (is not) any restriction on this property imposed by a Bill of urance (Should there be one, I realize I shall be liable to the propertrs h r common interest in this matter.) _SAMUEL L. AGEN Date: August 2, 1971 Signature of owner, or legally authorized agent 5-4-71 PC 150 FARRELL-WIMEBERLY, INC. A R C H I T E C T S PENTHOUSE UNIVERSITY TOWER LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72204 666-9445 May S, 1972 Mr. Richard Woods Little Rock City Hall Little Rock, Arkansas Re: RE -ZONING APPLICATION For Property Located West of Mississippi Between Ohio and Iowa Streets Dear Richard; I am enclosing a development plan for the above referenced property. The re -zoning application has already been filed by Mr. Burton Speights with Fausett and Company. If you have any questions on this or need additional prints, please call me. Sincerely, Ed Wimberly EW/pc cc/ Mr. Burton Speights Z V DEFERRED MATT 1. Z-2 7600 Block between Iowa and Ohio Streets - From: "A"-One-family Dist. pplicant; Various Owners by Sam Raines Land To. "E-1" Quiet Bus. Dist. Company The Staffs recommendation was read as,followso "This case file has a long history of changes and d.efarrals. Initially the applicant requested rezoning a large adjacent tract from "A" to "E" which the Staff recommended denial, and so informed the applicant. At the Commission meeting on September 12, 1971 the applicant request- ed a 30 day deferral which was granted. The applicant then withdrew the case prior to the October meeting. The applicant made application for the November meeting for rezoning of a larger tract to "F" -Commercial, which included that in the previous "E" Apartment September application. The Staff recommended denial of this application basically for the reasons of incompatibility of land use and the inadvisability of develop- ment of commercial on Mississippi due to the excessive grade in this area. At -the November meeting the applicant again requested a deferral until the February 3,1972 meeting. The applicant now requests a rezoning from "A" to "E-1" the 3 lots on Mississippi adjacent to the Bates "E-1" lot which is located on the southwest corner of Mississippi and Iowa Streets. The Staff recommends denial of this application. This property is well buffered by the "E-1" lot adjacent on the north, The grade of the street and below street grade of the properties at issue do not favor ""E-1" usage. The rezoning as requested would only encourage further extension of same use to the south end the terrain and shallow lots do not lend to such develop- ment. Provision for off-street parking is not possible with the located present structures.," Mr. Sam %ines was present representing the applicants. He stated they had had problems with this property and would like to withdraw the application at this time. A motion was made to withdraw the 2 lica.tion, which was seconded and passed. o -q �- may 25, 1972 City Board of Directors, Mr. Russel Xclean, Chairman Gentlemen: I was under the impression that the matter of rezoning the property between Iowa and Ohio just west of Mississippi had been settled, so I destroyed a letter which I had written to you earlier. To my surprise I find that I was too optimistic. If you could walk down Iowa some warm summer afternoon and see and smell the stream of trash and sewage often flowing in the make -shift gutter, you would understand paft of my objection to certain plans: of rezoning. This condition is not new. I don't have the answer, but I know more business would only make a bad matter worse, I can see the needq perhaps, for the use of this land, and the owners desire to sell, but I can also envision a strip of moderately priced homes on this land, with a private street from fowa to Ohio, and a buffer zone of trees or shrubs, to shield the homes from the school. Why doesn't some imaginative realtor take advantage of something like this, instead of forcing business in where it is so obviously not wanted by many people in the area? Have y&u checked the area? Sincerely, n s 7802 Bonnie Brae Road . .06 .__- City Planning Commission City of Little Rock Arkansas Gentlemen: This is to advise that we, the undersigned, have reviewed the proposed preliminary plans for development for an allergy clinic to be located between Ohio and Iowa Streets with the address to be known as 1824 North Mississippi and we have no objections to the rezonement of this property from "A -Single Family" to "E-1 Quiet Business". N Address' 0 Name % l re C Addre s woe' Na Addre s Name `< 7 `ice Td -dress Name ddress ,4l — �7Z �3 /- /9 7z Address Name Address Name �j 0 % Z_� /b/c� Address E Name Address 45 xne --dress �/, - I -.7Q--" FA .-ft so City Planning Commission City of Little Rock Arkansas Gentlemen: This is to advise that we, the undersigned, have reviewed the proposed preliminary plans for development for an allergy clinic to be located between Ohio and Iowa Streets with the address to be known as 1824 North Mississippi and we have no objections to the rezonement of this property from "A -Single Family" to "E-1 Quiet Business". Name & -PL Address x'mame 1�G g) Address F /- Name .101.7 6 -9 Z Address 7� 1410 - �.� Name Address 2 -- Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address . Name Address Na- me Address U� s -r �+ N Law. OFFICES SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS HENRY E. SPITZBERG H. MAURICE MITCHELL STEELE HAYS BERESFORD L. CHURCH, JR. JOHN P. GILL JOSEPH W. GELZINE W. CHRISTOPHER BARRIER JERRY D. JAC$SON OF COUNSEL BROOKS HAYS Mr. Richard Wood Department of Community Development City Hall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: 7600 Iowa Street Dear Richard: PYRAMID LIFE BUILDING LITTLE Rocx,AREANSAS 72201 (501) 376-3151 May 23, 1972 I have enclosed herewith an Abstractor's Certificate showing the owners of property within 200 feet of the above property, together with a copy of a letter sent to each owner by certified mail, and the receipts therefor. Very truly yours, E John P. Gill JPG:rb Enclosures This letter will advise that an application has been filed with the Little Rock Planning Commission to rezone from "A" single faiiiily to "E-1" quiet business classification of the following described property, to wits The West 162.5 feet of the Eh NEU NEU NEU Section 35, Township 2 North, Range 13 West, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. A public hearing an said application will be held by the Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, City Hall on June 1, 1972, at 3 o'clock p.m. While your presence thereat is not necessary, you may appear at that time to express your views on the request. SPITZBERG, MITCHELL & HAYS Attorneys for F. E. Bates And Tola S. Bates By John P. Gill. . 0 0 v Z m D: 06, . 0 ww W a r 3 0 d .O b N d a 0 I- u aZ W o Q Wd SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Or Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Alastclmys be AU go op - s " 7 `9' 1'2 7 -1-1 SENDER: Be sure f follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERtEO N0. ILSIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Must always be fll.:d in) �X- . 4 SIGNATImE OF ADDRESSEE'S �AU.NT. SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other -side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICES) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below o z :.i a N t ai x_ to O v i N S c `v a.� z O m _ e U F CY O C:1:_ - O m F m ^ d (0 O U 0 f m Y h � J La N O y V W C.) ' 4 j ` E > W md E W Z W — 7 Mm CL (n W C J m d m °� 6 y .t+ a Q 0 C •C IL • • rei 0 a OL6T '11oN [-Ltz[8—st—ss� MOA Sd r 3 0 d .O b N d a 0 I- u aZ W o Q Wd SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Or Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Alastclmys be AU go op - s " 7 `9' 1'2 7 -1-1 SENDER: Be sure f follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERtEO N0. ILSIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Must always be fll.:d in) �X- . 4 SIGNATImE OF ADDRESSEE'S �AU.NT. SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other -side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICES) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below c 9 5 d Q m i ♦� f �I W � .ac �Q C da �w Q Y 0 d v {t 0 U of IL a u, N s v Ir to O U Uf E c F C Y O V p c � U M (Y N A d ba U O a RR qqq F -t rT p 3' O U U +r • z E v 3 Q p N � N p m m O N d E m ul E M W — (n U) a _ oo IG_ Q°7 U F- J O 0 Cn ¢ I c .� IL LL • • a a` 1 U i-LLZi8-9i—SSS OL6I '-oN t X8£ uu0j Sd J N y Z h O O� d 'a O coo W r Y p.0 b L) a x G V O m m e m m o c V to Co � I � via c o W a 1° L) >�ca E d du7 N L '° _ r> Q u): 3.� UA Z �v a� au 0 a`, V) u' -I-- LU W ..J a. W r +.,.� .. A• "SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered 11 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. i► SIGNAnRE OR NAME OF ADDRE$$EE (Must always be filled in) SISttAAili OF ADORES S AGENT, CF ANY " ]. 2 DATE UELIVLREO SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested, a -Ad includo ZIP Code) SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) CShow to whom, date and address �` Deliver ONLY � j where delivered U to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: -Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered 1:1 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO- ► SIGNATURE OR RAME OF ADDRESSEE (Must alacup 6a fL&d in) 19 ":6 MW T-LL9[8-9[-990 OL61 .AaN T I 8 TOAaj Sd A } Y � d C) Z N O 0 i m CD U Q 0 Ld a) LLI m a a a v 13 m m a Gw o Ld o b aUj a U -a tv W o - 0a L W U ate. a, Wcn -:tot EN i co 3� a Z o •a ov m LL t L SirMDER: Be sure to follow instructions an other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered 1-1 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCKS) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address�{ Deliver ONLY where delivered 17 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below A 5 b ca I 4 v z Au lsJ Lemli � 0 a; d d i� O tjo O U y c 0 C � Z v 0 m G ❑ o ' ej F U Y U C V O U ba ~ Y r Z v m 'S moE DR4 Wp 'a Uw mz mvE U _ V)� Qz c 7 m y d a U c n. • • vi „u. a` �o T-LL9[8-9[-990 OL61 .AaN T I 8 TOAaj Sd A } Y � d C) Z N O 0 i m CD U Q 0 Ld a) LLI m a a a v 13 m m a Gw o Ld o b aUj a U -a tv W o - 0a L W U ate. a, Wcn -:tot EN i co 3� a Z o •a ov m LL t L SirMDER: Be sure to follow instructions an other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered 1-1 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCKS) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address�{ Deliver ONLY where delivered 17 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RF -(;LIF I Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SMATURE OR NAME Of ADDRESSEE (Ywtaltmus bell'kdCr) ry , C=RTMEii NO. I r' GNATUFRE OF A65R€SSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY n T-=19-91—No 0161 WN T I8£ wuoA Sd r ca s Z p ! I 00 O0 0 E . I�" W {G i a d4 i 3 s e ow o r W aai v a C u� U N a m b r nn ° ° C m m c r ti 0 � o m z u {yt � p � 5 ♦- o " U C Y O Q U) O C � ♦} Z nr 2'1 R � � to �� IS Z m E -- ° a E * o w v � m a - � o T �9 ray 3 v O y Vrij �Iii`l C �2E > u1 tY Z m v E N J N`7 w t9 CL m Y a N O Q i 'd rL0 LL too to z• • a_ Z u SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RF -(;LIF I Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SMATURE OR NAME Of ADDRESSEE (Ywtaltmus bell'kdCr) ry , C=RTMEii NO. I r' GNATUFRE OF A65R€SSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY n T-=19-91—No 0161 WN T I8£ wuoA Sd Only if requested, and include ZIP Code) SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, dateand address Deliver ONLY where deliverdd 0 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below `;- r ca d ra U O0 0 E . L` a W ai 3 s e Y d-.0 o r W -0 �. a C V b r C m m tJ L1 r ti 0 k u {yt � q 5 ♦- o " to Q U) I— u VLU h N 07 > uv b N`7 w .�. am 3 'd to Z u w W o ac d to az = 3 W rn W o � Only if requested, and include ZIP Code) SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, dateand address Deliver ONLY where deliverdd 0 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below `;- U Only if requested, and include ZIP Code) SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, dateand address Deliver ONLY where deliverdd 0 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered ❑ to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below `;- SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered El to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED -BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) FShow to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY ywhere delivered to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below t SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) QShow to whom, date and gdjlress _ Deliver ONLY where de#ivered 171 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below 0 z j l 4 CD W Ll� r fid �0. fl0 1 m O 0 (n U < Q Y�I O_ `y T N a y 1 m O U C_S z -a O D i; o , c U - v O m In m W m A •� rr(�\ •.Kiy� C �J Q Z Gl `W W = V u�i i o LLI�I a j- O. ;: a > lU cOi N � iill wz a— de 4A � (n to J ca .. m ._ v d •r01, � F J N O Q � CL us W U. c • • a 0 W 1-44ZTS-91-990 OL61 'AOM Tb£ uuoj Sd SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered El to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED -BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) FShow to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY ywhere delivered to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below t SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) QShow to whom, date and gdjlress _ Deliver ONLY where de#ivered 171 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below i V J 41 1 4 Cy ZN m O 0 (n a y ra > m W .� D i; o �= Go v d'� W m A •� C Ca dti Gl o u�i -O w w O. ;: a d a a Q `p 4A � � Q'' � 1u W w 3 z� o Uak — r m � W 11Wc F g -0 v (a ; E »` Ci U +• Co 44 N N LLJ p N .4.¢ b (nom 0 a m "d LLS 93 Z r a d UMW a� t 1%1 Iz RR. a a was rS SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY where delivered El to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED -BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) FShow to whom, date and address Deliver ONLY ywhere delivered to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below t SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) QShow to whom, date and gdjlress _ Deliver ONLY where de#ivered 171 to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below