Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutboa_04 29 2019LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY OF MINUTES APRIL 29, 2019 2:00 P.M. I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being four (4) in number. II.Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings The Minutes of the March 25, 2019 meeting were approved. Members Present: Frank Allison -Chairman Richard Bertram -Vice Chair Austin Grinder Joe Justus Members Absent: Carolyn Lindsey Polk City Attorney Present: Sherri Latimer LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA APRIL 29, 2019 2:00 P.M. I.OLD BUSINESS: A.Z-9392 10 Turtle Creek Lane B.Z-9400 1509 Rebsamen Park Road 11.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Z-3410-E 11100 Financial Centre Parkway 2.Z-7794-A 5205 Hawthorne Street 3.Z-8929-A 3 Cantrell Road 4.Z-9113-B 2005 Argyll Cove 5.Z-9410 111 Weston Place 6.Z-9411 2318 N. Palm Street 7.Z-9412 5401 Sherwood Road APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: A File No.: Z-9392 Owner: The Student Loan Guarantee Foundation of Arkansas Applicant: Mark Rose, KATV Address: 10 Turtle Creek Lane Description: Tract M-2A, Riverdale Addition Zoned: O-3 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the height provisions of Section 36-201 to allow a broadcast tower with increased height. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Office Building Proposed Use of Property: Office Building with broadcast studio STAFF REPORT A.Public Works Issues: 1.Public Works staff has no comment on the variance to Section 36-201. 2.Public Works staff has not reviewed any other part of this project at this time, and additional comments may be provided prior to approval of the building permit. B.Staff Analysis: The O-3 zoned property at 10 Turtle Creek Lane is occupied by a two-story office building located within the south half of the overall 3.98 acre property. The property is located on the north side of Turtle Creek Lane, between Brookwood Drive and Riverfront Drive. A driveway from Turtle Creek Lane and a driveway from Brookwood Drive serve as access to the property. Paved parking is located on the south and west sides of the building. The north half of the overall property is undeveloped and grass covered. Sinclair Broadcast Group/KATV is in the process of purchasing this property at 10 Turtle Creek Lane, with the intent of relocating their broadcast studio from its current location at 410 Main Street. As part of the relocation, the applicant proposes to construct a 100 foot tall broadcast tower within the undeveloped, north portion of the property, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed tower will be a APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: A (CONT.) Z-9392 self-supporting metal truss frame tower. The proposed tower will be located well over 100 feet back from the building and all property lines. The tower structure finish will be galvanized steel. A small antenna or dish will be attached to the tower structure near the top, but will not extend past the top of the 100 foot tall tower. Section 36-201 (e)(1 )a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum tower height of 75 feet for metal ground-mounted towers. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the proposed tower with increased height. Staff is supportive of the requested tower height variance. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed tower height of 100 feet will not be out of character with the heights of other buildings and tower structures in this general area. Signal Media Radio at 2400 Cottondale Lane has a 154 foot tall broadcast tower. There are also several multi-story buildings in this area along Riverfront Drive. The applicant notes that studies were conducted and it was determined that the absolute minimum tower height that will work for this location is 100 feet. Staff believes the proposed 100 foot tall tower at this location will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested tower height variance, as filed. Board of Adjustment (February 25, 2019) Mark Rose and Joe White were present, representing the application. There were several objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval. Marks Rose addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained that the proposed height of the tower was planned for long term use of the tower structure. He noted that there would be no lights on the tower. He explained that the width of the tower narrowed as the height of the tower increased. Joe White also spoke in support of the application. He explained that the elevation of the proposed tower site was 252 feet and that the elevation of the Treetops condo development was approximately 356 to 360 feet. He further explained that the Treetops condos owners would look down on and over the proposed tower and not into the tower. He noted that the proposed tower should not adversely impact the view of the river from the condos. Bob McKuin addressed the Board in opposition. He noted that he was opposed to the tower's close proximity to nearby multi-family developments. He stated that the variance should be denied. 2 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: A (CONT.) Z-9392 Bob Ratchford also spoke in opposition. He explained that the tower would impact the views from his condo. He noted that the tower would devalue his property. He asked that the application be deferred. James Corner also spoke in opposition. He also stated that views from his condo would be impacted. He noted that towers were not allowed in office zoning and quoted from the zoning ordinance. Jack Cherry also spoke in opposition. He asked for a deferral to allow more time for questions about the tower to be answered. Dana Carney, of the Planning Staff, explained that towers were accessory uses to broadcast studios and that towers were permitted in office zoning. Joe White further explained that the elevation of the top of the tower was less than the elevation of the Treetops property. Chairman Allison offered a deferral to the applicant based on the fact that only three (3) members of the Board were present. Mr. White requested to move forward. Chairman Allison noted that he had issues that needed to be addressed. Sherri Latimer, City Attorney, noted that the Board could defer an application on its own motion. A motion was made to defer the application to the March 25, 2019 agenda. The vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position. The application was deferred. Staff Update: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on May 6, 2019. The revised site plan moves the tower location slightly to the west, within the west portion of the north yard area. The proposed tower will be located 170 feet from the north property line, 100 feet from the west property line, and over 200 feet from the east and south property lines. The applicant notes that the location of the proposed tower was moved to provide a better signal than would be accomplished at the original location. The applicant also notes that additional information on health/safety issues and sight distance/visibility issues will be presented at the March 25, 2019 public hearing. The information will include photos with a simulation of the tower depicted. Staff continues to be supportive of the requested tower height variance. Board of Adjustment (March 25, 2019) Staff informed the Board that on March 18, 2019 the applicant submitted a letter to staff requesting this application be deferred to the April 29, 2019 agenda. Staff supported the deferral request. The item was placed on the consent agenda and deferred to the April 29, 2019 agenda. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. 3 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: A (CONT.) Z-9392 Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) Staff informed the Board that on April 23, 2019 the applicant submitted a letter to staff requesting this application be withdrawn. Staff supported the withdrawal request. The item was placed on the consent agenda and withdrawn. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 4 CJ KATV 501.324.7777 • katv.corn •PO Box 77 Little Rock, AR 72203 January 29, 2019 Mr . Dana Carney City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas. 72201 RE: 10 Turtle Creek Lane Zoning variance request Mr. Carney, Attached please find the zoning variance application for 10 Turtle Creek Lane. This site is in the Riverdale neighborhood of Little Rock and is zoned 0-3. We are requesting a variance to the height limit of 75 feet in order to place a 100 foot tall broadcast tower on the site. Sinclair Broadcast Group/ KATV is in the process of purchasing this property which is currently owned by the Student Loan Foundation. KATV intends to relocate their broadcast studio operations from their current location at 410 Main Street to the building at 10 Turtle Creek. The broadcast signal function of the station has certain requirements that can only be met by the placement of a tower on this site. Studies have been conducted to determine that the absolute minimum height for a tower at this location is 100 feet. The proposed tower is a self-supporting truss frame type towertypical to these functions. A 154' tall tower of similar construction is located at the Signal Media radio station at 2400 Cottondale lane near the Verizon campus in Riverdale. Drawings and photographs of the type of tower proposed are attached to this request. The tower structure finish would be galvanized steel. A small antenna or dish would be attached to the side of the tower structure near the top but would not extend past the top of the 100-foot tower. The height of this tower is below the threshold that would require a beacon light at the top, so no light will be placed. Given that the tower is critical to provide a broadcast signal and fundamental to station operation, we respectfully request a variance to the 0-3 height limit of 75 feet to allow this tower height of 100 feet. We believe that the variance is justified and will be a benign element in the neighborhood landscape. Please place this item on the Board of Adjustment docket for the February 25, 2019 meeting. Don't hesitate to call us if you have any questions or require any additional information. Thank you, General Manager cc: Mr. Bill Russell, Sinclair Broadcast Group Mr. David Porter, AIA, Principal I CEO ON YOURSIDE APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: B File No.: Z-9400 Owner: Off the Fronf, LLC Applicant: Lillian H. McRae, Cromwell Architects Engineers Address: 1509 Rebsamen Park Road Description: Lot 1, Rosenbaum Acres Addition Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the building line provisions of Section 31-12, the area provisions of Section 36-301 and the parking provisions of Section 36-502 to allow an addition to an existing commercial building with a reduced front setback and which crosses a front platted building line, and a reduced number of off-street parking spaces. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Commercial Proposed Use of Property: Restaurant, food production and sake brewery STAFF REPORT A.Public Works Issues: 1.Public Works staff has no comments in regard to the setback variances. 2.A grading permit is not required for the proposed site work. However, all construction work must include appropriate drainage and erosion control measures (i.e. hay bales, silt fencing, mulching etc.) to protect the municipal storm water drainage system and neighboring properties from sediment runoff. New development may be subject to inspections for compliance. 3.Prior to approval of the building permit, the applicant must agree to provide boundary street improvements. Boundary street improvements shall include, but not be limited to, reconstruction of one-half section of the abutting street if the existing street is not up to city standards. Repair, replace, or extend existing damaged, missing, and noncompliant curb and gutter, sidewalk, access ramps or concrete driveway aprons within the public right-of-way adjacent to the site. Remove abandoned driveway cuts and replace with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. All work within the public right-of-way shall conform to City of Little Rock Standard Details and ADA guidelines. APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: B (CONT.) Z-9400 4.Prior to approval of the building permit, all proposed striping and signage must conform to the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and designs are subject to approval by the Public Works department. 5.Prior to approval of the building permit, any proposed landscaping must provide safe sight distance at the adjacent intersection. Landscaping located within the 50 foot sight triangle at the intersection of Rebsamen Park Drive and Old Cantrell Road must be maintained below a height of 30 inches. Landscaping within the right of way may be subject to a franchise agreement with the Public Works. 6.The Public Works may provide additional comments or conditions prior to approval of the building permit. B.Landscape and Buffer Issues: C. 1.Site plan must comply with the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance and the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Any new development shall adhere to the current landscape code. 2.Any existing vehicular use area that does not meet current code requirements may continue as nonconforming until such time a building permit is issued to rehabilitate a structure on the property exceeding fifty (50) percent of the current replacement cost of the structure. At such time fifty (50) percent of the existing vehicular use area shall be brought into compliance with current code and shall continue to full compliance on a graduated scale based upon the percentage of rehabilitation cost. 3.All ground or roof mounted mechanical systems shall be screened from abutting properties and streets. Any trash receptacles or pickup shall be oriented away from a primary street side of the property and screened from the public right-of-way. Screen shall exceed the height of the dumpster or trash containment areas by at least two (2) feet not to exceed eight (8) feet total height. 4.The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. Staff Analysis: The C-3 zoned property at 1509 Rebsamen Park Road is occupied by a one-story commercial building The property is located on the east side of Rebsamen Park Road, at its intersection with Old Cantrell Road. Paved parking is located along the north and east sides of the existing building. An access driveway is located at the northwest corner of the property. The lot contains a 40 foot platted front 2 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: B (CONT.) Z-9400 setback line. A small portion of the existing building crosses the front platted building line by approximately nine (9) feet to 22 feet. The property backs up to a railroad right-of-way and drainage area. The applicant proposes to remove approximately 2,500 square feet of the front of the existing building and reconstruct the front portion of the building with approximately 3,356 square feet of building space, as noted on the attached site plan. The front 3,356 square foot portion of the building will be utilized as a restaurant use, with a new 1, 186 patio/outdoor seating area on the front of the building. The patio area will be uncovered and unenclosed. The area will be bordered with a short fence. The remaining 7,634 square feet of the building will be used for food production and a sake brewery. As part of the project the applicant will refurbish the existing paved parking on the north and east sides of the building. The site will contain 32 paved parking spaces. The applicant is requesting three (3) variances with the proposed redevelopment of the property. The first variance is from the area provisions of 36-301 (e) (1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. This section requires a minimum front setback of 25 feet. The reconstructed portion of the front of the existing building will be located approximately 13 feet to 33 feet back from the front (west) property line. The second variance is from the building line provisions of Section 31-12 (b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires platted building line encroachments be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. The proposed reconstruction of the front portion of the existing building will extend across the 40 foot front platted building line by approximately seven (7) feet to 27 feet. The last variance is from the parking provisions of Section 36-502 (b) (3) which requires 52 paved on-site parking spaces for the proposed use of the building. As noted previously, the site will contain 32 paved parking spaces. Staff supports the requested building line and building setback variances. Staff views this request as reasonable. The reconstructed front portion of the commercial building will maintain essentially the same front setback and building line encroachment as the existing building. Additionally, the proposed front setback will not be out of character with other commercial buildings in this area. The existing commercial buildings to the north have similar front building setbacks. However, staff cannot support the requested parking variance. Staff has concerns that the amount of parking proposed will not be enough to serve the proposed use of the building. The applicant has not proposed any off-site parking to accommodate the shortage of on-site spaces. Additionally, on-street parking is not allowed in this area. In the past, staff has supported parking variances in this general area when the applicant provides a combination of on-site and off-site spaces to either meet or come very close to meeting the minimum required by code. 3 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: B (CONT.) Z-9400 If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete a one-lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line for the addition. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. D.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the requested setback, building line and parking variances, as filed. Board of Adjustment (March 25, 2019) Staff informed the Board that the application needed to be deferred to the April 29, 2019 agenda, based on the fact that the applicant failed to send the required notifications to surrounding property owners. The item was placed on the consent agenda and deferred to the April 29, 2019 agenda. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. Staff Update: The applicant submitted a revised site.plan to staff on April 18, 2019. The new plan proposes to remove the existing building from the site and construct a new one-story commercial building, as noted on the attached site plan. The new building will occupy a similar portion of the site on the existing building. As noted previously, there is a 40 foot front platted building line on this lot. The proposed building will have a front setback ranging from 12 feet-11 inches to 38 feet-4 inches. Section 36-301 (e)(1) requires a minimum front setback of 25 feet for C-3 zoned property. Therefore, the applicant continues to request front setback and building line variances, with the resulting front setback being very similar to the original site plan. The revised site plan shows approximately 3,800 square feet of restaurant space, including an interior courtyard area for seating. The food and drink production area will be 5,200 square feet. The amount of building area will require 45 off-street parking spaces. The revised site plan shows 48 parking spaces. The parking space size and maneuvering areas comply with ordinance requirements. Therefore, there is no variance for reduced parking being requested with the revised site plan. The proposed new building is approximately 14 feet narrower than the existing building and will contain almost 2,000 square feet less building square footage. Staff continues to be supportive of the requested front setback and building line variances, as noted in paragraph C. of the staff report. The revised parking design will likely require a variance or variances from the City's Landscape Ordinance. The City Beautiful Commission must review and approve variances from this section of the code. 4 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: B (CONT.) Z-9400 Revised Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested front setback and building line variances, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1.Compliance with the Public Works and Landscape/Buffer requirements as noted in paragraphs A and B of the staff report. 2.Completion of a one-lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted building line as approved by the Board. 3.The City Beautiful Commission must approve any variances from the City's Landscape Ordinance prior to a building permit being issued. Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 5 April 16, 2019 Mr. Monte Moore Zoning Administrator Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: 1509 Rebsamen Park Road, Application for a Non-residential Zoning Variance Dear Mr. Moore, Please find enclosed our application for a Non-residential Zoning Variance. We are proposing to demolish the existing buildings on site at 1509 Rebsamen Park Road and build a storage and production space for a new restaurant that includes a courtyard dining space and an indoor food and beverage operation. The redevelopment of 1509 Rebsamen Park Road, formally known as the Marshall Clements Antique Store, is consistent in principle with the work that has been done developing downtown Riverdale with new restaurants and bar locations. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship of the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Little Rock. The occupant, Three Fold, plans to use the property as a restaurant with indoor and courtyard dining space featuring a bar and on site sake brewery. Specifically, Three Fold anticipates indoor seating to be allow for roughly 90 people and 30 outdoor seats. With the successful approvals of the City and state requirements, Three Fold hopes to begin operating as a restaurant and brewery in the Spring of 2020. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or concerns about the project development. Thank you, Lillian H. McRae APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 1 File No.: Z-3410-E Owner: Iberia Bank Applicant: Alex J. Bennett Address: 11100 financial Centre Parkway Description: Tract H-1-R, Pyramid Park Addition Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the height provisions of Section 36-301 to allow a flag pole which exceeds the maximum building height allowed. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Vacant Commercial Building Proposed Use of Property: Branch Bank STAFF REPORT A.Public Works Issues: No Comments B.Staff Analysis: The C-3 zoned property at 11100 Financial Centre Parkway is occupied by a one-­ story branch bank building located near the center of the site. The property is located at the northwest corner of Financial Centre Parkway and Hardin Road. A driveway from Hardin Road serves as access to the property. Drive-thru lanes are located at the west end of the building. Paved parking is located on the south side of the building. The applicant proposes to construct a 90 foot tall flag pole at the southeast corner of the building, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed flag pole will be located within an existing landscaped island. The applicant's intent is to fly a 30 foot by 50 foot American flag from the proposed flag pole. Section 36-301 (d) of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum building/structure height of 35 feet in C-3 zoning. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the proposed flag pole with a height of 90 feet. APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 1 (CONT.) Z-3410-E Staff is supportive of the requested height variance. Staff views the request as reasonable. The height of the proposed flag pole will not be out of character with other structures in this general area along Financial Centre Parkway. There are several other structures in this general area ranging from five (5) to nine (9) stories in height. Additionally, there are several other flag poles with similar height throughout the city. Staff believes the proposed flag pole with increased height will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested height variance, as filed. Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2 Anchor Realty Investments 302 Country Club Parkway • Maumelle, AR 72113 March 25, 2019 City of Little Rock Board of Adjustment 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Height Variance Application 11100 Financial Centre Parkway, Little Rock, AR 72211 Dear Board Members, This letter shall serve as both a request and permission to allow a flag pole structure which will be used to display the American flag at 11100 Financial Centre Parkway, Little Rock, AR 72211. We respectfully request permission for the following modifications: •Increase the height provision of Section 36-301(d) of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances to permit the erecting of a flag pole structure exceeding the current 35' height limitation in C-3 Zoning. We are asking for this variance due to the fact that, at the current zoning height limitation for structures, an erected flag pole would not be able to be seen from the public due to interstate obstructions, building and other obstructions. In addition, based on the current height limitation, there is an inherent obstruction based on the coiled composition of Financial Centre Parkway and the speed of traffic traveling to and from the I- 430 I l-630 Big Rock Interchange. We've created the attachments in order to accurately depict how the flag pole and American flag will look within the existing site conditions. Furthermore, we are requesting a height variance of 55 feet; the flag pole being 100 feet with approximately 10 feet below the ground to support the structure. The American flag will be approximately 30 feet tall by 50 feet wide. We understand that the requested 90' in height is taller than normally allowed, however, other subdivisions height variances have granted variances due to obstructions or otherwise. Adjacent building heights in the vicinity should also be noted to exceed the normal height restrictions, creating obstructions. As a result, we've attached examples of other flag pole structures in similar zonings that have been granted such height increases. We believe the height of the flag pole relative to the adjacent obstructions is in keeping with the intent of the ordinance. We are proposing that this site only needs this variance because of the obstructions, the declining slope of the property location, and the composition of Financial Centre Parkway. Furthermore, we do not believe increasing height for the flag pole to 90 feet at this location would have a negative impact on I-430's or I- 630's designation as a scenic corridor by triggering other businesses in the area to request similar sign heights. Respectfully, Alex J. Bennett APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 2 File No.: Z-7794-A Owner: Dwight and Margaret Blissard Applicant: Carolyn Llindsey Address: 5205 Hawthorne Road Description: Lot 2, Block 11, Newton's Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 and 36-156 to allow construction of a new residence with reduced front and rear setbacks, and an accessory structure with reduced side setback and increased rear yard coverage. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A Public Works Issues: No Comments B.Building Codes Comments: The required fire separation distance (building to property line) prescribed by the building code terminates at five (5) feet. Buildings are allowed to be closer than five (5) feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite one (1) hour fire resistance rating. When buildings are five (5) feet or more from the property line, the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself, only the projections such as eaves or overhangs. Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three (3) feet from the property line, and are prohibited when the exterior wall is Jess than three (3) feet from the line. There is no restriction on openings when the exterior wall is more than three (3) feet from the property line. Contact the City of Little Rock Building Codes at 371-4832 for additional details. APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.) Z-7794-A C.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at 5205 Hawthorne Road contains a one-story brick and frame single family residence. The property is located on the south side of Hawthorne Road, between Newtol') and N. Harrison Streets. A one-car wide driveway from Hawthorne Road is located at the northeast corner of the property. The driveway extends along the east side of the residence. The applicant proposes to remove the existing home from the property and construct a new 1 ½ story single family residence, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed residence will be located 23 feet back from the front (north) property line, with steps from the porch being 20 feet back from the front property line. The structure will be located 22.5 feet back from the rear (south) property line. The residence will be located five (5) feet back from the west side property line and 12 feet from the east side property line. A 22.33 foot by 23 foot detached garage will be located within the rear yard area at the southeast corner of the lot. The garage will be located four (4) feet from the rear property line and 1.5 feet from the east side property line. The garage will occupy 37.5 percent of the required rear yard area (rear 25 feet of the lot). A covered walkway will be located between the residence and the garage. Sections 36-254(d)(1) and 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires 25 foot front and rear setbacks for principal structures in R-2 zoning. Section 36- 156(a)(2)c. allows a maximum rear yard coverage of 30 percent for accessory structures in R-2 zoning. Section 36-156(a)(2)f. requires a minimum three (3) foot side setback for accessory structures. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the new residence with reduced front and rear setbacks, and the accessory garage structure with a reduced side setback and increased rear yard coverage. Staff is supportive of the requested variances associated' with the proposed new residence. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed lot development, with respect to building setbacks and overall lot massing, will not be out of character with many other lots within this neighborhood. The proposed front encroachment will be for only a small portion (66 square feet) of the porch and step area. The proposed rear encroachment will be for only approximately 10 square feet of the structure. Additionally, the variances associated with the accessory garage structure are very minor in nature. Staff believes the proposed residence with accessory garage will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. D.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and coverage variances, subject to compliance with the Building Codes requirements as noted in paragraph B.of the staff report. 2 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 2 (CONT.) Z-7794-A Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 3 Yeary Lindsey Architects March 26, 2019 Mr. Monte Moore Department of Neighborhoods and Planning 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Zoning Variance Application for 5205 Hawthorne Rd. Dear Monte, This project consists of a new 2900 square foot story-and-a-half house with a detached garage on the site of an existing house the owners have owned for 47 years. They are tearing down the existing house in order to build a new house that will allow them to age in place. We are requesting a zoning variance to allow the following: 1)Rear setback coverage of 39% to allow for a detached minimally sized 2-car garage. 2)Reduced side yard setback to the east of 18" at the detached garage only. 3)Reduced front yard setback of 20' that closely aligns with the current setback of the existing house and the house directly to the west of this lot. The front porch of the existing house is 19.8' from the front setback. We are requesting a 20' setback to the third step at the front porch to enable better maneuverability at the garage entry. The house proper will be set back 3' further than the current house due to the steps off the front porch being located on the north side of the porch. The hipped roof of the garage will be guttered to control the roof runoff along the east side. We feel this new house will be in keeping with the existing streetscape and density of the neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 501-372-5940 Fax: 501-663-0043 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 3 File No.: Z-8929-A Owner/Applicant: Jason Smith Address: 3 Cantrell Road Description: Lot 7, Pine View Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 to allow a building addition with a reduced rear setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A.Public Works Issues: No Comments B.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at 3 Cantrell Road is occupied by a one-story brick and frame single family residence. The property is located on the south side of Cantrell Road, at Beechwood Street. A circular driveway from Cantrell Road serves as access to the property. The lot contains a 45 foot front platted building line. The house is located over 80 feet back from the front (north) property line. The applicant proposes to construct a 28.4 foot by 44 foot two-story addition to the rear (southeast corner) of the existing residence, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed addition will include a carport. The proposed addition will be located 11 feet to 16 feet back from the rear (south) property line, and approximately 40 feet back from the east side property line. The applicant also proposes to construct a new accessory structure at the southeast corner of the lot. The proposed accessory structure will be located three (3) feet back from the east side property line and over five (5) feet back from the rear property line. It will be separated from the proposed two-story addition by approximately 19 feet. Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 25 foot rear setback for the principal structure on this R-2 zoned lot. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the addition to the principal structure with a rear APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 3 (CONT.) Z-8929-A setback ranging from 11 feet to 16 feet. The proposed accessory structure complies with the minimum ordinance setback requirements. Staff is supportive of the requested variance to allow a reduced rear setback for the proposed building addition. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed rear setback will not be out of character with other residences along the south side of Cantrell Road in this immediate area. Several of the residences in this immediate area have reduced rear setbacks, as they are located considerably more than 45 feet back from the front property lines. Ample separation will exist between the proposed building addition and the nearest structure to the south. Staff believes the proposed addition with reduced rear setback will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested rear setback variance, as filed. Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2 Date: March 20, 2019 Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 501-371-4790 RE: Variance for rear yard encroachment Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing to you in regards to the home at 3 Cantrell Rd in the city of Little Rock, AR 72207. I am requesting a variance to the code requiring a minimum of 25'-0" rear yard setback at rear of the existing house. The existing house currently sits on the property approximately 100 feet from Cantrell Road, well past the front building setback. Since the property is on Cantrell Road, all of the private area of the home has to be located in the rear of the house in order to have privacy and create a safe haven for cars, bicycles, and personal properties. The home currently has a two car open carport, and we are asking to expand that carport to encompass four cars for the whole family to park safely in the rear of the home. The front driveway is exposed to Cantrell making it an easy target for break-ins and theft of vehicles. Our proposed design calls for expanding the carport to a total width of 44' -0", which encroaches into the rear yard setback 14' feet at the closest corner and 10'-6" at the western corner. We will also add a half story to rear of the home in order to create a home office and studio above for the homeowners. We hope you will consider our request to encroach into the rear yard setback allowing us to park cars safely in the rear of the property. Sincerely, Jason Smith APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 4 File No.: Z-9113-B Owner: Joseph and Susan Tama Applicant: Donnie Holland Address: 2005 Argyll Cove Description: Lot 15R, Lochridge Estates Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow a residence with reduced front setback and which crosses a front platted building line. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A.Public Works Issues: No Comments B.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at 2005 Argyll Cove is occupied by a split level brick residence which was recently constructed. The property is located near the end of Argyll Cove which runs in a southeastern direction from Lochridge Drive. The property is located outside the Little Rock City limits, but it is within the City's extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction. The property contains a 25 foot front platted building line. A portion of the existing residence crosses the front platted building line, as noted in the attached site plan. The residence encroaches across the front platted building line by 15.5 feet to 8.1 feet at certain points, resulting in a front setback ranging from 9.5 feet to 26.9 feet. It is apparent that a mistake was made when the house was laid out on the lot. The City conducted no building inspections (including footings) since the property is located outside the city limits. Section 36-254(d)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front setback of 25 feet. Section 31-12(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that building line encroachments be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.) Z-9113-B Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the new residence with reduced front setback and which crosses a front platted building line. Staff is supportive of the requested front setback and building line variances. Staff views the request as reasonable. The options which exist would be to grant the variances or require that the residence be torn down. Staff can see no reason to require the residence to be removed. Much of the Lochridge Estates subdivision complies with the hill side standards as per the City's Subdivision Ordinance, based on the slope of many of the lots. The hillside standards allow front setbacks of 15 feet. Front setback and building line variances for several lots within this subdivision have been granted in the past, based on the fact that the homes needed to be pulled closer to the front property line based on the slope of the property. This lot has a 19 percent slope from front to back, which qualifies for the hillside standards (slope of 18 percent or greater). Staff believes the existing residence, as constructed with reduced front setback, has no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete a one-lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line for the residence. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. C.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line variances, subject to completion of a one-lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted building line as approved by the Board. Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2 Holland Surveying, LLC Professional Land Surveying Services 4281 Lake Norrell Road, Alexander, Arkansas 72002 (Cell): 501-993-2893 (Fax): 501-320-4365 (E-Mail): hollandsurveying1@gmail.com TO: Little Rock Board of Adjustment 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR This application is to request a variance for the current building setback lines for Lot 15, Lochridge Estates, Pulaski County, Arkansas and recorded in Plat Book "I" at Page 56 of the Pulaski County Records. The reason for requesting this variance is that the as-built location of the existing residence encroaches into the currently platted building line location. Attached is the survey plat of the lot with the areas requested for variance. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Donnie Holland, PS#1625 APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 5 File No.: Z-9410 Owner: Blain and Cindra Burgess Applicant: Tim Daters Address: 111 Weston Place Description: Lot 3, Block 17, The Villages of Wellington Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow a step and landing structure with reduced front setback and which crosses a front platted building line. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residence under Construction Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A.Public Works Issues: No Comments B.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at 111 Weston Place is occupied by a two-story single family residence which is under construction and nearing completion. The property is located on the east side of Weston Place, south of Wellington Village Road. The property is located within a curve of Weston Place, with a compound front property line running along the west and south property boundaries. A 25 foot platted building line is located along the compound frontage. A new two-story residence is in the process of being constructed on the lot, as noted on the attached site plan. The applicant proposes to construct a six (6) foot by 25 foot landing/step structure to the front of the residence. The landing/step portion of the residence will cross the front platted building line by six (6) feet, resulting in a front setback of 19 feet. The landing/step portion of the residence will be uncovered and unenclosed. Section 36-254(d)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front setback of 25 feet. Section 31-12(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that building line encroachments be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 5 (CONT.) Z-9410 Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the steps and landing portion of the new residence with reduced front setback and which crosses a front platted building line. Staff is supportive of the requested front setback and building line variances. Staff views the request as reasonable. The requested front encroachment is for only a small portion (150 square feet) of the overall residence. The landing/step portion will remain uncovered and unenclosed. Because of the curvature of the street, the residence will not have the appearance of being out of alignment with other adjacent residences. Staff believes the proposed landing/step portion of the residence will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete a one-lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line for the addition. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. C.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line variances, subject to the following conditions: 1.Completion of a one-lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted building line as approved by the Board. 2.The landing/step portion of the residence must remain uncovered and unenclosed. Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2 Blaine and Cindra Burgess 14324 Orleans Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Re: 111 Weston Place Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Final Plot Plan Lot 3, Block 17 The Villages of Wellington Little Rock, Arkansas To Whom it May Concern: We have recently purc hased the home located at 111 Weston Place, in the Villages of Wellington subdivision here in Little Rock. The house was in a state of roughly 75% -80% completion when purchased and has sat in a state of partial completion for nearly 2 ½ years by our best estimate. In our attempt to finish construction of our new home, it was discovered that the original survey was inaccurate, due to a shifting of the structure on the lot, for reasons unknown to us. As a result, while trying to design a front entry with curb appeal worthy of ours and the surrounding residences, it was determined that there was only two feet (2' 0") available to construct our stairs which would be impossible based on the required setback. r have received an architect's sketch rendering of what we would propose for a sufficient entryway, working hard to correct what we have inherited, while also maintaining the standards of appearance for such a fine neighborhood. Based on the sketch and our contractor's bid to completion, we would require a variance on the setback of 6.0' X 25.0' to construct our landing and steps on such a steeply graded lot. As our house is situated on a curved corner lot, I do not believe there would be any encroachment of the sight lines, nor do I anticipate there would be any objections from our new neighbors. They will be thrilled to have this eyesore cleaned up with construction finally completed. I appreciate your thoughtful consideration of our request for a setback variance of 6.0' X 25.0' and look forward to your reply. Blaine A. Burgess APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 6 File No.: Z-9411 Owner: 2318 Palm, LLC Applicant: Fred Lord Address: 2318 N. Palm Street Description: Lots 9-12, Block 9, Country Club Heights Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 and 36-156 to allow a new residence with reduced rear setback and an accessory structure with reduced front setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A Public Works Issues: No Comments B.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at 2318 N. Palm Street is occupied by a two-story brick single family residence located near the center of the overall property. The property is located on the west side of N. Palm Street, at the north end of the street where it dead-ends into the Little Rock Country Club golf course. A one-car wide driveway from N. Palm Street is located near the southeast corner of the property. An accessory structure is located along the south property line. The applicant proposes to remove the existing residence and accessory structure from the property, and construct a new two-story residence and accessory structure, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed residence and accessory structure will occupy essentially the same foot print as the existing structures, and will have a similar architectural style. The proposed residence will be located 25 feet back from the front (east) property line and 20.5 feet (at its closest point) from the rear (west) property line. The proposed residence will be located 42.6 feet from the north side property line and over 50 feet from the south side property line. The proposed accessory (detached) structure will be located 51 feet back from the front (east) property line, approximately 60 feet from the rear (west) property line and 10.8 feet APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 6 (CONT.) Z-9411 from the south side property line. The accessory structure will be separated from the principal structure by 16.6 feet. Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear setback of 25 feet for principal structures in R-2 zoning. Section 36-156(a)(2)c. requires a minimum front setback of 60 feet for accessory structures. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the proposed residence with a reduced rear setback and the accessory structure with a reduced front setback. Staff is supportive of the requested setback variances for the proposed residence and accessory structure. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed residence and accessory structure will occupy essentially the same foot print as the existing structures. The two (2) setback variances are very minor in nature and will not be out of character with other principal and accessory structures in the neighborhood. Staff believes the proposed residence and accessory structure with reduced setbacks will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or general area. C.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variances, as filed. Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2 Fred Lord, Builder, Inc. P.O. Box 17567, Little Rock. AR 72222-7657 501-821-1212 flbld@aol.com March 5, 2019 City of Little Rock Department of Planning & Development 723 W Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Board of Adjustment: We propose to build a new home at 2318 North Palm Street to replace the existing home currently on that site. Being sensitive to the historical and architectural nature of the existing home, we propose to build a new home that reflects the same style and architectural detail of the existing structure. We intend to build the home within the 25' setback line on the East side, or street side of the property, but are seeking a variance to encroach into the 25' setback on the West side, or rear of the property 4'6" in order to satisfy the space requirements of the new home. We have spoken to the property owners directly to our West (who are also building a new home} and they have no objection to this encroachment. We are also seeking a variance to have an accessory building located 51' from the front, or East property line, instead of the 60' requirement. The reasons for this are two-fold: 1)We are trying to preserve a 12' oak tree and several 6' magnolia trees immediately to the West of the proposed structure, and 2)We think it would be more aesthetically pleasing for the neighborhood to have the accessory building line up with the garage portion of the main structure Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Fred Lord Agent for 2318 N. Palm LLC APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 7 File No.: Z-9412 Owner: David and Sheffield Duke Applicant: Ellen Yeary Address: 5401 Sherwood Road Description: Lot 184, Prospect Terrace No. 3 Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 to allow a deck addition with reduced side setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A Public Works Issues: No Comments. B.Building Codes Comments: The required fire separation distance (building to property line) prescribed by the building code terminates at five (5) feet. Buildings are allowed to be closer than five (5) feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite one (1) hour fire resistance rating. When buildings are five (5) feet or more from the property line, the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself, only the projections such as eaves or overhangs. Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three (3) feet from the property line, and are prohibited when the exterior wall is Jess than three (3) feet from the line. There is no restriction on openings when the exterior wall is more than three (3) feet from the property line. Contact the City of Little Rock Building Codes at 371-4832 for additional details. C.Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 5401 Sherwood Road is occupied by a two-story frame single family residence. The property is located on the south side of Sherwood Road, west of N. Harrison Street. A circular driveway from Sherwood Road serves as APRIL 29, 2019 ITEM NO.: 7 (CONT.) Z-9412 access to the property. The property slopes downward from front to back (north to south). An elevated deck, approximately eight (8) feet above grade, is located at the southeast corner of the residence. The deck is uncovered and unenclosed. The applicant proposes to remove the existing deck from the rear, southeast corner of the residence and construct a new deck, as noted on the attached site plan. The new deck addition will be slightly larger than the existing deck. The new deck will be located 1.5 feet to two (2) feet back from the east side property line. The steps leading from the existing deck to the rear yard area will remain, as the new deck will maintain the same elevation above grade as the existing deck. The proposed new deck will have a 36 inch high solid deck rail. Seven (7) foot high operable shutters will be located along the north and east sides of the new deck. Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side setback of approximately 5.9 feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the new deck addition with a reduced side setback. Staff is supportive of the requested variance to allow a reduced side setback for the new deck addition. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed deck addition will be uncovered and unenclosed (except for the operable shutters), and should have a very minimal visual impact on the adjacent properties. The property owners immediately to the east have submitted a letter of support for the new deck structure. Staff believes the proposed deck with reduced side setback will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. D.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested side setback variance, subject to the following conditions: 1.Compliance with the Building Codes requirements as noted in Paragraph B. of the staff report. 2.The deck addition must remain uncovered and unenclosed (except for the operable shutters). Board of Adjustment (April 29, 2019) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2 Yeary Lindsey Architects March 25, 2019 Mr. Monte Moore Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: David and Sheffield Duke Variance Request 5401 Sherwood Road Little Rock, AR Dear Monte, Please find attached our submittal to the Little Rock Board of Adjustments requesting a variance regarding the property at 5401 Sherwood Road. Our clients are requesting a variance to the side yard setback regulations in order rebuild and extend their existing second-floor deck. We are asking that we be allowed to build within 18" of the existing fence line which is on the property line. The main floor of the house is elevated an average of 6 to 8 ½' above grade and the proposed deck will be elevated similarly. This puts the decking at or above the top of the fence line as it travels toward the back of the site. The east property and fence line also angles away from the house so that the 18" space will only occur twice and widens as the fence line splays back to the south. The existing elevated deck was previously screened by plantings on the adjacent neighbor's property but new neighbors have removed all plantings and poured a concrete drive to the fence line to access a new two story addition with parking below. Our clients plan to do a solid deck rail 36" high with operable shutters to 7' high on the north and east sides to reclaim some privacy from the east side in particular. If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me. We app reciate your consideration of our request. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellen Yeary, AIA, LEED AP 3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 501-372-5940 Fax: 501-663-0043 SHEFFIELD C. DUKE 5401 SHERWOOD ROAD LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 April 12, 2019 Mr. Gary Duke Mr. Jeffery Chapman 5327 Sherwood Road LittIe Rock, AR 72207 Re: Requested Variance for Reduced Side Setback Dear Gary and Jeffery, David and I have hired Ellen Yeary to design the restoration of our deck to recover some privacy. Ellen has recommended that we request a reduced side setback to extend the deck to the east. The deck expansion would be one foot from the fence between our prope1ties. This plan requires us to apply for a zoning variance, and the public hearing is scheduled for April 29, 2019 at 2:00. Ellen also recommended that we ask you two to sign a letter approving the deck addition and the requested reduced side set back. David and I felt that it would be easier for us to draft this letter to evidence your consent. Please let us know if you have problems with our request for the zoning variance. Otherwise, we would appreciate your approval of the variance by signing this consent. APPROVAL By signing this Approval, we both consent to your request for the reduced side setback between our adjoining prope1iies, and request the City to grant your request for a reduced set back autl1orizing you to expand your deck to one foot between our deck and your fence. GARY DUKE Date: JEFFERY CHAPMAN Date: DATE: Ar/l.,;,' / -z--, , � t 5 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VOTE RECORD r J MEMBER ALLISON, FRANK BERTRAM, JAM ES GRINDER, AUSTIN JUSTUS, JOE LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN TIME IN AND TIME OUT ALLISON, FRANK BERTRAM, JAM ES GRINDER, AUSTIN JUSTUS, JOE LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN ✓AYE • ft ... • a ,. - � 2,:00 � A NAVE -- r-.. � A -Pi I 1,, � if � ' 7 / r, / � , ryJ � v t 1.JV' " As{J/1, V / \ (1 1/\ ,...v / ... ;,/' 1./' A ABSENT .1_ABSTAIN Meeting Adjourned 't�of P.M. APRIL 29, 2019 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:04 p.m. Date: Chairman Secretary