Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpc_06 12 1997LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING HEARING SUMMARY AND MINUTE RECORD JUNE 12, 1997 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being nine (9) in number. II. Approval of the minutes of the May 15, 1997 meeting. III. Members Present: Members Absent: Larry Lichty Hugh Earnest Mizan Rahman Herb Hawn Bill Putnam Craig Berry Pam Adcock Doyle Daniel Sissi Brandon Suzanne McCarthy Ron Woods City Attorney: Stephen Giles LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING HEARING AGENDA JUNE 12, 1997 I. DEFERRED ITEMS: A. Repeal of the Little Rock General Plan B. Master Street Plan Amendment; Pinnacle valley Road II. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. Land Use Plan Amendment in the Ellis Mountain Planning District; changing an area from Mixed Office Warehouse to Commercial. 2. Master Street Plan Amendment; modifying the collector pattern in the Kirk Road area. 3. Parks Master Plan Amendment; removal in the River Mountain Neighborhood Park Expansion. 4. Land Use Plan Amendment in the River Mountain Planning District; changing an area from Park Open Space to Single Family. 5. Land Use Plan Amendment in the 65`h Street West Planning District; changing various areas to Commercial and Office. 6. Master Street Plan Amendment; removing two collectors in the Otter Creek Planning District. III. OTHER MATTERS 7. Presentation to the Planning Commision from Chenal Properties. June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.: A NAME: Little Rock General Plan Ordinance #15738 LOCATION: Little Rock REQUEST: Repeal Ordinance #15738 which adopted the Little Rock General Plan SOURCE: Planning Staff STAFF REPORT: The Little Rock General Plan was adopted by Ordinance on September 5, 1989. Depicting land use city wide on a board scale, the plan also includes written narrative on Little Rock's growth policies, land use plans, transportation, district planning, population, downtown information, and implementation. In the eight years since its adoption, the General Plan has become out dated. The narrative contains information which is no longer valid. For example, many on the planning districts described have since been reshaped and renamed. There have been numerous changes to the map since its publication. The Planning Staff feels that the General Plan provides a good generalized guide to Little Rock's policies on growth and development and that it should continue to be available to the public. However, Staff feels that the General Plan should not be adopted by Ordinance because of the continuing need for updates. The Planning Staff recommends the document be a publication of the Department of Planning and Development, much like the Annual Report, allowing the General Plan to be quickly revised when necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends approval to repeal Ordinance ##15738. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAX 1, 1997) Walter Malone, Planning Manager introduced the item and yielded the floor to Commissioner Earnest. Commissioner Earnest moved that the item be referred to the Plans Committee. By unanimous vote (9 for 0 against) the item was deferred. June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: A (cont.) STAFF UPDATE: The General Plan, Ordinance 17,738, is really a composite of several other Plans and Ordinances. However, the General Plan Ordinance has not been modified with each change to the respective ordinances. This has resulted in an ordinance which is in conflict with more up to date ordinances. The General Plan does serve a useful purpose, but having two ordinances attempting to do the same thing leads to problems - inconsistencies. In order to assure that the General Plan is accurate, this ordinance should be each of the ordinances which together are the "Generale or comprehensive plan. Thus a new ordinance should be adopted which is the various ordinances: Master Parks Plan, City Land Use Plan, and Master Street Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 1997) Walter Malone, Planning Manager, indicated that Staff wished to replace the current "General Plane with a General Plan which would be made up of the Master Street Plan, City Land Use Plan, Parks Master Plan and each of the Neighborhood Action Plans. Commissioner Hawn stated he felt it was important to include the Neighborhood Plans as a part of this document. There was discussion about Ordinance versus Resolution. Commissioner Earnest as Plans Committee Chair asked to see the ordinance language before it is sent to the Board of Directors. A motion to approve the request as presented was made by Commissioner Hawn (Commissioner Rahman seconded). By a vote of 9 for, 0 against the item was approved. 2 June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.: B NAME: Master Street Plan Amendment LOCATION: Pinnacle Valley Road - Maumelle Park to Hwy. 300 REQUEST: Modify design standards for arterial APPLICANT: State Parks and Recreation Department STAFF REPORT: Staff received a request to reduce the classification or design standard for Pinnacle Valley Road through Pinnacle State Park. City Staff from the Public Works, Planning and Parks Departments review the request. Pinnacle Valley Road provides a connection between Hwy. 300 and Hwy. 10 and is almost 6 miles long. In the area north of Cantrell Road (Hwy. 10) east of Hwy. 300 (an area of over 10 square miles), Pinnacle Valley is the only arterial. The area serviced to Pinnacle Valley Road is largely agricultural or recreational with a scattering on single family homes. There is a State Park - Pinnacle, Corps of Engineers Park - Maumelle and Proposed City Park - River Mountains. These recreational uses generate traffic including large vehicles (RV/campers, buses). Due to the existing Parks and lack of alternative routes, staff cannot recommend changing the classification. Pinnacle Valley Road will function as an Arterial-- "...provide short distance travel..." However, a lesser standard is acceptable as the Plan indicates "...areas where development will be limited. - Staff met with representatives of the Parks Department to discuss options and alternatives. The State representatives strongly want no major widening or "improvement- of the road. They wish to keep the road within the existing right-of-way. City Staff has no problem with a two lane road. A rural standard is proposed which would include shoulders. The shoulders are desirable due to the bicycle traffic and recreational vehicles campers using Pinnacle Valley Road. City Staff believes the industrial collector design standard should be used for this section of Pinnacle Valley with added pavement to provide left turn lanes at major intersections. A special notation can be made that a 60 foot right-of-way will used through the state park. In the other areas, the right-of- way is likely to be close to 80 feet. June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) The other property owners have been notified of the change and today's meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the reduced design standard. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 1, 1997) Walter Malone, Planning Manager indicated that the Master Street Plan Amendment to reduce the design standards for Pinnacle valley Road was at the request of State Parks. A letter requesting deferral has been received from the Parks Department and Staff has no problem with a deferral. By unanimous vote (9 for 0 against) the item was deferred. STAFF UPDATE: After review for a letter from the State Parks Department, Staff can support the future reduction of the design standard through the Park. Since the area will be left natural (no adjacent development and access), the further reduction is acceptable. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 1997) Walter Malone, Planning Manager, indicated that Staff would agree to the reduced standard for Pinnacle Valley Road. From the parks property line west of Highway 300, the State Parks Department cross-section would be used. From the property line to Maumelle Park the "industrial open drainage" section would be used. Mr. Stan Graves, the Manager of Planning and Development of Parks and Tourism asked to clarify the standards and "rural." Mr. Malone repeated the standard as described in an April 29 letter from Mr. Graves and the section found in the agenda; a rural section is open ditch (no curb). Commissioner Hawn moved approval. By a vote of 9 for, 0 against the item was approved. 2 June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.: 1 NAME: City Land Use Plan Amendment -- Ellis Mountain District LOCATION: South of Chenal Parkway, west of Kanis REQUEST: Mixed Office Warehouse to Commercial SOURCE: STAFF REPORT: Property Owner At the request of a property owner, planning staff developed an amendment to commercial for an area south of Chenal Parkway, west of Kanis Road. The property owner wishes to allow commercial uses for the site. As stated in the letter of request, this location is an appropriate location for a grocery store. Currently the Land Use Plan recommends Mixed Office Warehouse. The land use pattern in the immediate area (along Chenal Parkway) has not changed in the last ten years. However to the North there have been several changes. In 1995, a Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban Office area was moved south from the Loyola --Wellington village Road intersection to north of the Methodist Church. Also in 1995, south of the West Loop a Multifamily and Community Shopping area was changed to Office, Mixed Office Commercial and Multifamily -- an urban village'. To the East of Rock Creek, an area was changed from Low Density Multifamily to Suburban Office and Single Family. The Chenal Parkway/Kirk Road area is currently not fully developed. There is vacant commercial (C3), office (03) and multifamily (MF18) areas to the North and west. Rock Creek provides a barrier to the South; however, with single family across the creek care should be taken along the creek edge. There is available vacant commercially zoned property to the East and west. The City has consistently been opposed to commercial zoning of the area in question. Concerns about strip commercial, etc. have been the issues. This request would significantly increase the commercial areas in the vicinity. There has not been any indication of need for more commercial land. Large areas remain undeveloped and new residential or intensification of residential have not occurred. In addition to the size of the commercial expansion, there is an additional area to the West that may also ask for commercial if this is granted. The result is likely to be another Bowman/Markham/Chenal/Kanis area -- large box commercial. The Plans intent to have a mix of uses would be lost in the Kanis/Chenal/Kirk area as it has been in the June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) Bowman/Chenal/Markham/Kanis area. If this area is changed to commercial over a mile stretch of Chenal Parkway would be commercial. This will effectively strip the parkway way. Considering comments from citizens about previous commercialization of Chenal Parkway, Staff believes the mixing of uses is still to preferred development pattern. To that end Mixed Office Warehouse is appropriate or a change to Mixed Office and Commercial would be appropriate. Such a change would permit to a grocery store as suggested by the application as long as other non-commercial using are also included in the development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends deferral as filed. A change to Mixed Office Commercial is appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 1997) Walter Malone, Planning Manager, presented the item. Mr. Malone reviewed the Land Use Plan in the area. Staff's concern is that if this location is changed to Commercial, the result would be in strip commercial for over a mile in both directions along Chenal Parkway. In addition, staff is concerned that the commercial could continue to the west to the West Loop at Kanis Road. At the request of the Plans Committee, the Land Use Plan for a two mile radius is shown as well as a map of commercial with acreage. These maps show numerous commercial sites (vacant) both to the northwest and east -- several are over 10 acres. Staff wishes to prevent another commercial strip and believes that Mixed Office Commercial is a good compromise. As long as there is some office in the development than the request would be in conformance. Commissioner Earnest read a section of the staff report dealing with need for more commercial. Commissioner Putnam asked about the requirements of Mixed Office Commercial. There was some discussion of the use pattern allowed - Office or Mixed Office and Commercial with a PZD. Robert Brown, Development Consultants, spoke for the applicant. Mr. Brown reviewed the reason why this site had been selected for the request - access, visibility, spacing, growth potential. This site would reduce trip distance and provide a destination point, with larger retailers. Joe Whisenhunt, the developer of the shopping center, stated other sites were reviewed but none met the requirements. This would be 2 June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) a destination center providing all shopping needs. Kroger is opposed to a mix with Office due to traffic volumes, etc. Ruth Bell, League of Women voters, asked that the Plan be followed. Ms. Bell raised concern about traffic intensity, stripping with commercial, creating another bottleneck. There was discussion about the Kanis Study and having that group review the implication. Commissioner Berry and Tony Bozynski, Assistant Director of Planning, provided information on the status of the Kanis Study. In response to a question by Chairman Lichty, there was discussion about service area, etc. Commissioners Daniel and Berry discussed the need for commercial and in particular a grocery. Also discussed was the reduced trip length. The Commission discussed deferral to allow the Kanis "Public Meeting" to occur first. There was discussion about the employment to be added, etc. After much discussion about potential deferral dates and whether that would work for the applicant. The applicant asked for a vote. Commissioner Hawn moved the Plan be amended to Commercial (Daniel seconded). By a vote of 4 for, 5 against the item failed to be approved. Based on the vote, the item is forwarded to the Board with a recommendation of denial. 3 June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.: 2 NAME: Master Street Plan Amendment -- Modification of collector pattern LOCATION: South of Chenal Parkway, Kirk Rd area REQUEST: Relocation of Collectors SOURCE: STAFF REPORT: Property Owner The property owner on the south side of Chenal Parkway, west of Kanis Road wishes to realign a collector to the West. The new alignment would connect to Kirk Road on the north side of Chenal Parkway. This change would affect the north side collector pattern. Staff agrees that the modification on the south side of Chenal is minor. The new alignment provides the same basic function and needs the same basic need. On the north side of Chenal Parkway, the proposed change moves the collector location to Kirk Road. The northern section of Kirk Road is already designated a collector. The mostly likely (re)development of the Kirk Road area would result in all of Kirk being a Collector, if this change is approved. Since all the land along Kirk Road is zoned commercial, office or multifamily, having a long collector should not have any significant negative impacts. Staff believes that moving the collector alignment to Kirk Road will serve the same basic propose. The Public Works and Planning Staffs are comfortable with moving the collector, with a realigned north --south through movement. Adjacent property owners and the surrounding neighborhoods have been notified of this meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends approval as revised. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 1997) Walter Malone, Planning Manager, presented the item. Staff believes the modification in collector locations will serve the same needs, and therefore is supporting the request. Staff does believe Kirk Road will to the through movement to the north of Chenal Parkway, with this change staff recommends approval. June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) Commissioner Hawn (Rahman seconded) moved approval. By a vote of 9 for, 0 against the item was approved. E June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.: 3 NAME: River Mountain Neighborhood Park Expansion Master Parks Plan Amendment LOCATION: Northwest of Russ Street between Walton Heights/Candlewood and Pankey REQUEST: Remove area from the Master Parks Plan SOURCE: Property Owner STAFF REPORT: The site is located north of Cantrell Road between the communities of Pankey and Walton Heights/Candlewood. The property lies northeast of Russ Street and is part of the hillside that rises to Walton Heights/Candlewood. Single Family homes of the Pankey Community are along Russ Street. The Master Parks Plan, which was adopted in 1983, depicts this site as an area for expansion of the River Mountain Neighborhood Park. The River Mountain Park has not yet been developed though the City does own property for part of it. The area to the north and southeast is shown on the Land Use Plan as Parks/Open Space. The area to the east is depicted as Parks/Open Space and Singe Family. Single Family is also shown on the Plan to the west and southwest of the site. The area is zoned R-2 Single Family. Parks staff has reviewed the proposal by the owner requesting a change from Parks/Open Space to Single Family. This property is on the Parks System Master Plan as a Priority One acquisition. The property was originally planned to be part of a regional park, and due to its rugged nature, would primarily be used as open space and rustic trails. Since the Park System Master Plan was adopted, the City has acquired adequate open space (such as, Fourche Creek Bottoms, Two Rivers and other River Mountain property). Currently, the City's priority is for land that accommodates active recreational needs (soccer, ballfield etc.). Consequently, Parks will not recommend acquiring this property and will be amenable to owner's request of removal from the Parks Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (June 12, 1997) The item was presented by Pat Herman, Planner II. She indicated that owner was requesting the removal from the property from the Parks Master Plan to allow for development. The Parks Department had prepared a written statement indicating they were amenable to the owners request. Jack Matthews, representative for the property owner, spoke in favor of the change. Ruth Bell, League of Women Voters, spoke against amending the Master Parks Plan. The Commission discussed alternative means of acquiring park and open space land and mentioned the possibility on an easement in the properties northeast corner. The Planning Commission requested that the Parks Department meet with the property owner to discuss alternatives for the property. The Commission voted (7-2) to defer the item to the July 10 meeting. 2 June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.• 4 NAME: Land Use Plan Amendment - River Mountain District LOCATION: Northwest of Russ Street between Walton Heights and Pankey REQUEST: Amendment Land Use Plan from Parks/Open Space to Single Family SOURCE: Property Owner STAFF REPORT• The site is located on the hillside between the community of Pankey and the Walton Heights/Candlewood Subdivision, north of Cantrell Road. It is shown on the Land Use Plan as Parks/Open Space. This mirrors the Master Parks Plan which shows the property as an extension area of the planned River Mountain Neighborhood Park. The area to the north and southeast is shown on the Land Use Plan as Parks/Open Space. The area to the east is depicted as Parks/Open Space and Singe Family. Single Family is also shown on the Plan to the west and southwest of the site. The area is zoned R-2 Single Family. Land Use as Single Family is compatible with the surrounding uses and with the amendment to the Master Parks Plan. This would be a minor plan amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends approval of the Land Use Plan Amendment from Parks/Open Space to Single Family. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (June 12, 1997) Pat Herman, Planner II, requested the item be defered until the July 10 meeting. The Planning Commission voted (9-0) for the deferal. June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.: 5 NAME: LOCATION• REQUEST: SOURCE: Staff Report: City Land Use Plan Amendment - 65`h Street West Planning District South of Colonel Glenn Road, east of David O'Dodd Road and west of Interstate 430 From various uses to Commercial and Office White-Daters and Associates At the request of a property owner, a plan amendment review was initiated. The property owner requested a Community Shopping - Office -Suburban Office area be changed to Commercial and that a Suburban Office -Single Family area be changed to Office. Planning Staff reviewed the existing land use and zoning patterns in,the area, as well as the land use plan. North - State Farm Insurance Office and Baptist System Support Center; zoned C-2 South - Vacant woodland; zoned R-2 East - Interstate 430 right of way West - J. A. Fair High School, single family residential and woodland; zoned R-2 There has been one recent land use amendment within the immediate area of the proposed land use changes. This change occurred in May 1996. The amendment was in the immediate area that the current request is in. The changes included: changing the area at the northwest corner of I-430/Colonel Glenn from CS to MOC, changing an area at the southwest corner of I-430/Colonel Glenn from CS to C, changing an area east of the High School from CS/SF to SO, changing an area north of the High School from SF to 0, changing an area at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lawson/Colonel Glenn from C to CS, and changing an area at the northwest corner of Colonel Glenn/Bowman from 0 to CS. The applicant has requested that the current Commercial land use area be extended to the south to a line that is even with the northern border of the High School; and be extended to the west to David 0' Dodd Road. After review of the area, Staff can support the expansion of the Commercial land use. The applicant has also requested that an area directly east of the High School be changed from Suburban Office and Single Family to Office. Staff believes that the Single Family south of the proposed Office needs to be protected. This could be done with a 50 foot Park/Open Space strip between the Office and Single June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) Family, or with a Suburban Office strip between the Office and Single Family. Staff believes that Office is not an inappropriate land use, but there needs to be protection of the future viability of the Single Family to the south. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends expansion of commercial. Staff cannot recommend the approval of the Office as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 1997) Shawn Spencer, Planner II, presented the item. Mr. Spencer reviewed the Land Use Plan in the area. Staff did not have any concerns with the enlargement of the Commercial land use. Staff did have concerns with Office land uses abutting Single Family land uses. Staff feels the future viability of the Single Family would decrease if there was not any buffer between the two uses. Commissioner Adcock asked for deferral until information is provided on who the applicant is, what it is, what the intentions are for the property, and the effect on the area/city. Tim Daters, White-Daters and Associates, was present. Mr. Daters informed the Commission that he recently filed for a rezoning on this property at the July 10th Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Daters stated he would be willing to defer the item if the land use request could be considered at the same time as the zoning request. Commissioner Hawn proposed a Suburban Office area to be a buffer between the Office and the Single Family. Mr. Daters stated that the zoning he will be requesting at the next zoning hearing meeting is 0-2, which is not allowed in Suburban Office. Suburban Office requires a POD. Chairman Lichty asked Mr. Daters if he would briefly explain what was being planned for the property. Mr. Daters responded that a hospital was planned for the site. In response to a question by Commissioner Putnam there was discussion on why land use change request and zoning requests are heard at a different meetings. Commissioner Adcock asked staff to also provide if more hospital beds are needed and the empty bed vacancy rate. Commissioner Rahman asked staff for input from the School District about the impact of Office land use on Fair High School. He was also concerned with Office land use being next to potential Single Family. 2 June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont. Commissioner Hawn stated that the expansion of the Commercial was reasonable and rational. He was concerned with the abrupt change from Office to Single Family. Commissioner Hawn suggested Suburban Office as a stepdown from Office to Single Family. Mr. Daters proposed a strip of Suburban Office along the southern portion of the site. Then during the rezoning process some conditions would be added to the 0-2 zoning that would make it compatible with the Suburban Office land use, such as limiting building heights, building set backs, and extent of clearing and fill. These conditions would not negatively impact the adjacent undeveloped residential property. Commissioner Adcock made a motion to defer the item to the July 10th Planning Commission meeting and hear the land use change request and the rezoning request at the same hearing; and the applicant is to incorporate a buffer between the Office and Single Family land uses. Motion was seconded. Motion carried. (8 ayes, 0 naves, 3 absent) STAFF UPDATE: Staff has compiled the information as requested, and has included the information separately in the packet. 3 June 12, 1997 ITEM NO. • 6 NAME: LOCATION• Master Street Plan Amendment - Otter Creek Planning District Otter Creek Subdivision REQUEST: Reclassification of Fawn Tree and removal of the westerly leg of Wimbledon Loop from the Master Street Plan SOURCE: Otter Creek Land Company Staff Report Staff received a request from the Otter Creek Land Company to reclassify Fawn Tree Drive from a collector to a local street; and to remove the westerly leg of Wimbledon Loop from the Master Street Plan. Wimbledon Loop is currently classified as a collector. Fawn Tree Drive was not designed or constructed to collector street specifications. Staff believes that Fawn Tree Drive will function as a collector once the westerly connection to the Outer Loop is completed. Once the Outer Loop is constructed, this connection will provide the Otter Creek Subdivision with greater access. Staff can not support the reclassification. Staff believes that the future construction of the Outer Loop may cause the neighborhood to re-evaluate the westerly leg of Wimbledon Loop as a desirable connection. Leaving it on the Master Street Plan will insure that when the area is platted, the right of way will be reserved. Staff will support a deferral of the collector construction until requested by the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that Fawn Tree Drive be left as a collector on the Master Street Plan. Staff recommends that the westerly leg of Wimbledon Loop be left as a collector on the Master Street Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 1997) David Scherer, Design Review Engineer, presented the Master Street Plan Amendment. Mr. Scherer explained the current street layout and the future street connections in the area. He stated that the reason for denial is based on the connectivity of the neighborhoods, and concern that the amendment would force an June 12, 1997 Planning Hearing ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) overload on the arterials because traffic would have to circle around Otter Creek. Tommy Hodges, Otter Creek Land Company, described the development of Otter Creek over the last twenty years and the traffic pattern through Otter Creek. Mr. Hodges withdrew his request for the western leg of Wimbledon Loop to be removed from the Master Street Plan. Mr. Hodges stated he would reserve the right-of- way, but not build a part of it until some future date when the neighborhood wants to build it. Mr. Hodges stated that Fawn Tree was designed and built to residential street standards, and was never intended to be a collector. He stated that the Otter Creek Land Company, the Board of Otter Creek, and the residents of Otter Creek are opposed to Fawn Tree being connected to the Outer Loop. Mr. Hodges was concerned with connecting to the Outer Loop, which is not in Pulaski County. He stated that there was little or no control of land use or zoning across the county line. There was discussion about the Outer Loop's location in Saline County and it's proximity to Otter Creek. Mr. Scherer stated that staff is not asking for the road to be built at this time, but to reserve a corridor for when the need arises. Mr. Hodges stated that Otter Creek did not want its future determined by development in another county. Otter Creek wants to put a cul-de-sac at the end of Fawn Tree. There was discussion about why a corridor needs to be reserved and about the design standards that the connection would need to be built to. A motion was made to declassify Fawn Tree as a collector with no connectivity, on the Master Street Plan; as per the applicant's request. The vote was: 5 ayes, 3 nayes, 3 absent. Due to a lack of 6 votes, either for or against the motion, the item will be forwarded to the City Board with a recommendation for denial. E June 12, 1997 ITEM NO.• 7 Mr. McCray, of Chenal Properties, was not able to attend the meeting. There was no discussion on the item. There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. 2 i I� I �x Date C'Chairman 0 cc 0 0 uj cc uj 0 z 0 0 z H Z CL -t 71- son MMM MINOR Kv NEI I I I ININ11111 IN31111111118 Bill LLJ NMI Illmil z III 1211MID (.D W:D r,�j Z < C) z0 11 - Mimi M < d: LU Emil >�Lu rr C/) z 0 0 z M< C-) 0 :E < III cc Llj cr: < Ir CD < z < C) 0 =) 0 C) F- (n Lu co 2 Ir p¢ 0- 3: -:3 =1 -t 71- 0 VA cc I I I LLJ z LLJ Oz w< z (.D W:D r,�j Z < C) z0 Z M Cl) M < d: LU >�Lu rr C/) z 0 0 z M< C-) 0 :E < LLJ cc Llj cr: < Ir CD < z < C) 0 =) 0 C) F- (n Lu co 2 Ir p¢ 0- 3: -:3 =1 0 VA cc I I I LLJ z