Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutboa_08 31 2009LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY OF MINUTES AUGUST 31, 2009 2:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being five (5) in number. II. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings The Minutes of the July 27, 2009 meeting were approved as mailed by unanimous vote. III. Members Present: Members Absent: David Wilbourn, Chairman Robert Winchester, Vice Chairman Leslie Greenwood Scott Smith James Van Dover None City Attorney Present: Debra Weldon LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA AUGUST 31, 2009 2:00 P.M. I. OLD BUSINESS: No Old Business II. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Z -6563-A 11 Pinnacle View Cove 2. Z -7385-A 15 Ranch Valley Road 3. Z-8491 5524 Chevaux Court 4. Z-8492 11518 Ponderosa Drive 11 1 I'll 1; , i ! I ;; i ;I; wsX LL C) 4-a Clb SbMOHI NVO EN 4-a 0 a3 IV wC7 NvArnn Z Ir OOC AVMHO H Oa S)*wds wp 910 co -RIV, ,rQ 0 0 N Q oNfe S NIVISH 0N'd3H a Vs A`C�Nfo T" j F Ft 00 ST 11 m U00 ARCVi Z. Z Z 0 1 04 SE)Nl8dS V4 blf�=[ I 2L I ry 9A U'a, 'S as SONIaLL a3A3a 13 Idd Sill IWN •L —W1 031HP am mioAumatj N nnoaatla NHO -j t \ ON SIOWS as -4 HS S oco" S a3-LN1 m m a 9 01:1 3VG1kJ 1A EN 4-a 0 a3 IV wC7 NvArnn Z Ir OOC AVMHO H Oa S)*wds wp 910 co -RIV, ,rQ 0 AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 1 File No.: Z -6563-A Owner/Applicant: Tracye Smith Thomason Address: 11 Pinnacle View Cove Description: Lot 252, Cypress Point Addition (The Ranch) Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from easement provisions of Section 36-11 to allow construction of a swimming pool which encroaches into a utility easement. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: 1. No objection to encroachment on City easement, however obstructions placed in City maintained easements are subject to removal or damage if maintenance of utilities or stormwater drainage facilities is needed. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 11 Pinnacle View Cove is occupied by a two-story brick single family residence. There is a two -car wide driveway from Pinnacle View Cove which serves as access. The property backs up to a pond area which is back -water from the Little Maumelle River. There is a ten (10) foot wide utility easement which runs along the rear (north) property line. The applicant proposes to construct a swimming pool at the northwest corner of the property, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed pool will be located approximately eight (8) feet from the northwest corner of the residential structure, and extend 5 to 6 feet into the rear utility easement. It will be located 4 to 5 feet back from the rear (north) property line and approximately 20 feet AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 1 (Con't.) from the west side property line. The pool will be located in a grass covered area of the rear yard. There are no overhead power lines in the rear yard area. Section 31-11(f) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that encroachments into utility easements be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the swimming pool to encroach 5 to 6 feet into the rear utility easement. None of the public utility companies object to the requested encroachment. The applicant has submitted written sign -offs from all the public utility companies. Staff is supportive of the requested easement encroachment. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed swimming pool meets/exceeds the minimum required setbacks from property lines and separation from the residence. The property was left with a relatively small rear yard area after construction of the residence, due to the irregular "pie shape" of the lot and the need to push the house further back on the lot to achieve the side setbacks and a driveway serving a side -loading garage. As noted previously, all the public utility companies approved the proposed pool placement. Staff believes the proposed pool, with easement encroachment, will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested easement encroachment, as requested. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (AUGUST 31, 2009) The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 noes. Tracye Smith Thomason. 11 Pinnacle View Cove 5� 3 -4 Little Rock., AR 72223 July 21, 2009 Dana Carney, Zoning Manager City of Little Rock Planning and Development Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Dear Dana, Please accept this as the cover letter for justification and reasons for requesting a variance from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. My family would like to put a swimming pool in our back yard. After much research we found we didn't have as much space as we had thought. There is a 10 ft. easement in the backyard -this was originally dedicated for utility usage if needed. I have contacted all the utility companies and they all have approved the encroachment, (see attachments). There is plenty of room in the back of my property to place a pool with the added 10 ft. and I will only use 5-6 ft of the easement for the pool itself. There is another 70 + feet that are designated as community property that leads on down to the lake (see attachment). In 1998, we also requested a variance to place my house a little further back on the property. As you can see on the plot plan, my lot is pie shaped which makes it difficult to place structures a certain way so we had to move it back a bit. After talking with the pool design crew, we have come up with a creative design to get a beautiful pool in the back which will only raise the value of our area. My neighbors have all agreed! If there are any questions or concerns, you may contact me at (501) 352-3404 or (501) 868-8000. Sincerelv, Tracye Thomason AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 2 File No.: Z -7385-A Owner/Applicant: James and Andrea Gary Address: 15 Ranch Valley Road Description: Part of Lot 29, Pine Manor Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A time extension is requested for previously approved setback variances associated with a proposed carport addition. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Staff Analysis: On July 30, 2007 the Board of Adjustment approved side and rear setback variances for a proposed carport/covered walkway addition on the east end of the residence located at 15 Ranch Valley Road. The addition was approved with a rear setback of 13.5 to 14.5 feet and side setback of 18 inches minimum (with a maximum overhang of five (5) inches), with the following conditions: 1. Guttering must be provided to prevent water run-off onto the adjacent property to the east. 2. The carport structure must remain unenclosed on the north, south and east side, with the exception of the small enclosed storage room at the southeast corner of the carport structure. 3. The carport must be constructed to match the existing single family residence. Please see the attached July 30, 2007 Board of Adjustment minute record and applicant letter for more information on the proposed carport project. On July 22, 2009 the applicant submitted a letter to staff requesting a time extension for the approved variances, as a building permit has not yet been issued/obtained for the proposed construction. A variance approved by the Board is active for two (2) years, within which time the applicant must at least AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 2 (Con't.) obtain the permit for construction. At the time the variances were approved for the carport addition, the applicant was in the process of making additional renovations to the residence. The applicant notes in an attached letter that those projects needed to be completed prior to construction of the carport addition. Staff is supportive of a one (1) year time extension (from the July 30, 2009 expiration date) for the previously approved variance. Staff believes an additional year will be sufficient time for the applicant to obtain the building permit for the carport project. To staff's knowledge, there have been no changes in circumstances which would change staff's previous recommendation of approval for the project. Also attached is a letter from the property owner immediately to the east supporting the proposed addition. B. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year time extension for the previously approved setback variances. The building permit for the carport addition must be obtained no later than July 30, 2010. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (AUGUST 31, 2009) The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in the "staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 noes. James M. Gary One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, 20th Floor Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Direct (501) 975-3140 Cell (501) 680-9096 Home (501) 664-1919 iim.gary(@kutakrock.com July 22, 2009 Via Hand Delivery Mr. Monte Moore Department of Planning/Development City of Little Rock 723 West Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Case No: Z -7385-A — Setback Variance r7-� -r4 Request: Extension of setback variance approved on July 30, 2007 Owner: James and Andrea Gary Description: 15 Ranch Valley Road — Request for extension of variance (Part of Lot 26, Pine Manor) Zoned: R-2 Dear Mr. Moore: We respectfully request an extension of time in connection with a setback variance which was approved by the Board of Adjustment with conditions on July 30, 2007. A copy of the Board's approval is attached hereto for your convenient reference as Exhibit A. The reason for this request is that we decided to wait to construct the new carport and covered walkway, which is the subject of the approved variance, until after we had completed the additional renovations to the home and recovered from that construction. Our plans, including our contractor Jack Hartsell, have not changed in terms of the planned construction approved with conditions by the Board of the carport and covered walkway, as more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A. We thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. Should you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. 4846-1828-8900.1 Best personal regards. Sincerely, 93-4-31k 9Z5 Jim and Andrea Gary Enclosures 4846-1828-8900.1 c J j 3 7,007 JULY 30, 2007 ITEM NO.: 1 y+ File No.: Z -7385-A -2 Owner/Applicant: James and Andrea Gary Address: 1 5 Ranch Valley Road Description: Part of Lot 29, Pine Manor Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36- 254 to allow a carport addition with reduced side and rear setbacks. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 15 Ranch Valley Road is occupied by a 11/2 story brick and frame single family residence. There is a two -car wide driveway from Ranch Valley Road at the northeast corner of the lot which runs along the east property line to a side -loading garage on the east end of the house. There is also a circular driveway in the front yard area. The applicants propose to construct a 20 foot wide carport/covered walk addition on the east end of the house, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed addition will be constructed to match the existing residence and be unenclosed on its north, south and east sides, with the exception of a small enclosed storage area at the southeast corner of the carport. The proposed addition will have a side setback (east side) ranging from one (1) foot at its northeast corner to 22 inches at the southeast corner of the proposed carport structure. The addition will have a rear setback of 13.5 to 14.5 feet. There is a small Rubbermaid storage building near the southeast corner of the lot which will be removed with the proposed addition. The applicants note that the J U LY 30, 2007 ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.) proposed carport/walk addition will be for a disabled child who will be both a driver and passenger of vehicles to be parked under the carport. Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side setback of eight (8) feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Section 31-254(d)(3) requires a minimum rear setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the applicants are requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the proposed carport/covered walk addition with reduced side and rear setbacks. Staff does not support the variances as requested. Although staff has no problem with the proposed rear setback given the separation between this house and the properties/residences to the south, staff cannot support the proposed side setback. Staff believes the proposed one (1) foot side setback at the northeast corner of the carport structure is slightly too small to allow for the construction and maintenance of the carport. Staff could support an 18 inch minimum side setback for the carport structure, with a maximum overhang of five (5) inches (as proposed by the applicant), and guttering provided to prevent water run-off onto the adjacent property to the east. If the applicants were to agree to revising the application accordingly, Staff could support side and rear setback variances. Staff feels the unenclosed carport structure will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. The applicant's submitted a letter from the property owner immediately to the east supporting the proposed addition. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the requested setback variances, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JULY 30, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff informed the Board that the applicant contacted staff on July 30, 2007 and amended the application to provide a minimum side setback of 18 inches for the proposed carport, with a maximum overhang of five (5) inches. Staff supported the amended application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Guttering must be provided to prevent water run-off onto the adjacent property to the east. 2. The carport structure must remain unenclosed on the north, south and east sides, with the exception of the small enclosed storage room at the southeast corner of the carport structure. 3. The carport must be constructed to match the existing single family residence. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. James M. Gary One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, 20"' Floor Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Direct (501) 975-3140 Cell (501) 680-9096 Home (501) 664-1919 iim.gary(a,kutakrock.com June 21, 2007 Via Hand Delivery Department of Planning/Development City of Little Rock 723 West Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Owner: James and Andrea Gary Description: 15 Ranch Valley Road — Request for Variance (Part of Lot 26, Pine Manor) Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from Section 36-254 to allow a carport addition with reduced side and rear yard setbacks Dear Sir or Madame: We respectfully request a variance to construct a new carport and covered walkway structure as indicated by the enclosed survey plot. The proposed new construction has been drawn on the survey by our architect Ellen Yeary of Yeary Lindsay Architects. We recently purchased this home with these improvements in mind. As indicated on the enclosed survey, the proposed construction will be attached to the east side of the existing house. The existing house is a 1 1/2 story brick and frame single family residence. Although, we are doing significant additional repairs and construction updating to the existing house, this will be the only totally new construction. The proposed carport will attach to the house on the west side of the carport and the three other sides (east, north and south) will remain open. All construction and improvements to the inside and out, including the proposed carporUwalk, has been designed by our architect. Our contractor is Jack Hartsell. Both enjoy excellent reputations for high quality design and workmanship. Moreover, the proposed 4811-7341-5937.1 carport/walk will be constructed using the same design, color, trim, and other architectural material so as to match the existing structure as if it had been original construction. We request that the carport be 20.1 feet at the front � and extend back a depth of 34 feet as shown on the enclosed drawing. The roofing and guttering systems will be -- state of art -- designed and constructed to direct any water flow either down our drive to the street or into a covered "French" drain which will flow to the street. We request that you please consider the following factors in making a determination of our variance request: _ • One of the primary reasons we are seeking to construct the carport and walkway is to accommodate our disabled daughter. Our daughter was born with Spina Bifida and is permanently confined to a wheelchair. Because our daughter is both a driver and at times a passenger, we need sufficient room on both sides of a vehicle for her to be able to side load — from her wheelchair to vehicle or vehicle to wheelchair — either from or into the driver or passenger side. We also need sufficient room on both sides of a vehicle for our daughter to be able to safely wheel along the side of a vehicle. The drive has a significant upward slope and the carport and walkway will be constructed at the top of the drive which is a flat area needed for our daughter to safely gain access to vehicles and the house. The planned carport and walkway will afford her covered and safe access from an automobile into the house. Taking these factors into consideration, there is no where else to reasonably accommodate our daughter's disability and needs in this regard. Not being able to construct this i���provement would work a significant hardship upon our daughter and us in this regard. • Our architect and builder -- both enjoy an excellent reputation for expertise and top quality workmanship. Taking into consideration the lot configuration, it is our intent for the proposed construction to of the highest quality possible and to insure that our neighbors and the general public are taken into consideration at all times. For example, care will be taken in the design and construction to insure the best possible access to the property, drainage flow, overhang, maintenance, etc. • We recently purchased this property with a mind toward constructing the carport and walkway. The property had previously been owned by Matthew and Susan Jeter, who like us, had plans to construct almost the same structure. The Jeter's variance request was granted by the City. See File No. Z-7385. In accordance with Department procedure, we enclose the following: • Six (6) copies of a recent survey, dated April 24, 2007, certified by a registered professional land surveyor, which shows all exisiting and proposed improvements properly dimensioned and labeled by our architect. • Our application fee in the amount of $80.00, and sign fee in the amount of $5.00. 4811-7341-5937.1 We thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. Should you need any additional information, including the full architect plans and drawings, please do not hesitate to contact us. Best personal regards. Sincerely, Pr- r?5 Jim and ea Gary Enclosures 4811-7341-5937.1 -T-, q4-- 2 -Z- 7395-/4 July L(q_, 2007 Department of Planning/Development City of Little Rock 723 West Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: 15 Ranch Valley Road Dear Sir or Madame: We understand the owners, Andrea and Jim Gary, of the house next door to ours located at 15 Ranch Valley Road have applied for a variance to construct a new carport and covered walkway. I am aware that these plans have been designed by Ellen Yeary of Yeary & Lindsay Architects, and that the general contractor will be Jack Hartsell. I have reviewed the variance request and the plans. Both meet with our approval and we have no objection to the Gary's variance request. Sincerely, Thomas A. d Nancy Monroe 11 Ranch Valley Road AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 3 File No.: Z-8491 Owner: Samuel and Beth Highsmith Applicant: Greg Conley Address: 5524 Chevaux Court Description: Lot 2, Block 3, Chevaux Court Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36- 254 to allow a covered patio addition with a reduced rear setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF NOTE: The applicant submitted a letter to staff on August 19, 2009 requesting the application be withdrawn. Staff supports the withdrawal request. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (AUGUST 31, 2009) The applicant was not present. Staff informed the Board that the applicant had requested the application be withdrawn. Staff supported the withdrawal request. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and withdrawn by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. ca Ao�i ti L �;��- J�, C�� -(O\ TY141C�, {'r , Chi p I cl -7 i��Vi�� lk rvvc��cmcevylW�e C�,U-c, .Y-zImVA 0' �u.C�,�,� t�e`�j c�Ct U�1fi� 1,�1�. --r VC� KA' +D AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 4 File No.: Z-8492 Owner: Andrew and Kathy Gibson Applicant: Andrew Gibson, JR. Address: 11518 Ponderosa Drive Description: West side of Ponderosa Drive, north of Yarberry Lane Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: The applicant is requesting an administrative appeal of a denied home occupation/business license. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential with home occupation. STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 11518 Ponderosa Drive is occupied by a one-story brick and frame single family residence. There is a one -car wide driveway from Ponderosa Drive which serves the property. The property is located on the west side of Ponderosa Drive, north of Yarberry Lane (east of Chicot Road) On June 3, 2009 the applicant submitted an application for a home occupation/business license for the property at 11518 Ponderosa Drive. The request is for a home office for a "mobile auto repair" business. The applicant, Andrew Gibson, JR., lives on the property with his mother. He proposes to utilize approximately 120 square feet (bedroom) of the residence as a home office for the "mobile auto repair" business. He will have one (1) truck, Ford F- 150 pick-up, parked on the site. Please see the attached letter from the applicant for a description of the "mobile auto repair" business. AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 4 (Con't.) Staff denied the requested home occupation application based on the fact that the proposed use, "mobile auto repair", is not on the list of permitted home occupations as per Section 36-253(b)(6)b. of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Following are the home occupation standards as per Section 36-253(b)(6) of the code: (6) Home occupation. a. Home occupations shall be permitted that will not: 1. Change the outside appearance of the dwelling or provide product display visible from the street. 2. Generate traffic, parking, sewage or water use in excess of what is normal in the residential neighborhood. 3. Create a hazard to persons or property, result in electric interference or become a nuisance. 4. Result in outside storage or display of any material or product. 5. Involve accessory buildings. 6. Result in signage beyond that which may be required by other government agencies. 7. Limited to five hundred (500) square feet in area, but in no case more than forty-nine (49) percent of the floor area in a dwelling. 8. Stock in trade shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the floor area of the accessory use. 9. Require the construction of, or the addition to, the residence of duplicate kitchens. 10. Requirement or cause the use or consumption on the premises of any food product produced thereon. 11. Provide medical treatment, therapeutic massage or similar activities. b. The following are permitted home occupations, provided they do not violate any of the provisions of the previous subparagraph a: 1. Dressmaking, sewing and tailoring. AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 4 (Con't.) 2. Painting, sculpturing or writing (artistic endeavors). 3. Telephone answering service or radio monitoring service. 4. Home crafts such as model making, rug weaving and lapidary work. 5. Tutoring limited to two (2) students at a time. 6. Music instruction limited to two (2) students at a time. 7. Catering and home cooking. 8. Computer programming. 9. Clock or watch repair. 10. Personal or home care products marketing without stock in trade on premises. c. The following are prohibited as home occupations: 1. Barbershops and beauty shops. 2. Animal hospitals 3. Dance studios. 4. Mortuaries. 5. Nursery schools. 6. Private clubs. 7. Small appliance repair shops. 8. Restaurants. 9. Stables or kennels. 10. Animal grooming. 11. Engine or motor repair shops. 12. Paint shops. AUGUST 31, 2009 ITEM NO.: 4 (Con't.) d. Any proposed home occupation that is neither specifically permitted by subparagraph b., nor specifically prohibited by subparagraph c., shall require an accessory use permit and be granted or denied by the city department designated by the city manager upon consideration of those standards contained in this paragraph. Appeals from the administrative judgment of the staff shall be filed with the board of adjustment. The content of the filing shall consist of: 1. A cover letter addressed to the chairman and members of the board of adjustment setting fort the request; 2. A copy of all pertinent graphic materials or correspondence. This filing shall occur within thirty (30) calendar days of the action by the staff. No activity which requires an accessory use permit shall be conducted prior to issuance of the permit. Any proposed use requiring employees who are not residents of the dwelling shall be approved by the board of adjustment prior to the issuance of permits. The applicant is requesting a home occupation use that is not specifically listed as a permitted home occupation use as per Section 36-253(b)(6)b. of the code.' Therefore, the Board of Adjustment is being asked to determine whether or not the applicant's proposed use, "mobile auto repair", should be allowed as a home occupation. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (AUGUST 31, 2009) The applicant was not present. Staff noted that the application needed to be deferred to the September 28, 2009 Agenda at the request of staff and the City Attorney's office, to study the issue further. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred to the September 28, 2009 Agenda by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. Executive Summary Dru's Mobile Auto Repair (also referred to as "the Business") is a start up business that will be the premier mobile automotive repair business in the Little Rock/North Little Rock Metro area. The business will provide its clientele with top of the line service, specializing in preventive maintenance, troubleshooting, and parts changing, at minimal cost to its clients. The Business will solely focus on preventive maintenance, troubleshooting, and parts changing. The Business will not undertake in any major repairs such as engine swapping, transmissions, or auto body repair (exterior/interior). Services will include: •'• Brakes •'• Tune Ups ❖ Oil Changes ❖ Changing Water Pumps, Thermostats, Alternators, and other Automotive Parts ❖ After Hours Roadside Assistance Andrew Gibson, Jr. will own and operate the business. Mr. Gibson holds an Automotive Technology Degree from Pulaski Technical College located in North Little Rock, Arkansas and also received a Certificate of Completion from the Wheel Vehicle Mechanic School from the United States Army. Mr. Gibson will put all major automotive repair compliances in place for all operations of the business. He will make sure that all used oil is properly disposed of at local automotive parts stores, all old parts and scrap metal parts are disposed of at the appropriate scrap metal disposal yards, and that all refrigerants are properly excavated, maintained, and recycled. Dru's Auto Repair's is being capitalized by Andrew Gibson, Jr. 100% in direct owner investment. Hours of Operation Monday Friday 8:00am-5:30pm Saturday (by appointment only) • • O U W w W H O F— Z LLI2 V) Q LL O Q O Do W Q D �i �a 9 ~ w pJ m LU ui_0 _W J 0_ m Lij J > ~ O m Z 0 C U F - Z - pz p O L ui H ui 3S x U � W LU W Q p U uj z (If= ~ w pJ m LU ui_0 J Cts O ~ O W Z p Z U F - Z - z p = O o W ui W � m Z z �CD -�iU>� n. -0 CL) c 0 Q m c a) a) PEW �i z w Ci m w Q z 2 W �Q August 31, 2009 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:04 p.m. Date: 712e1DI 704 Chairman < Secretary