5307 RESOLUTION NO 5 ,307
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE MANPOWER (C.E.T.A. ) PLAN; AND
FOR OTHER PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
SECTION 1. Pursuant to requirements of CETA regulations
and recommendations from staff and Manpower Planning (Advisory)
Council the Board of Directors hereby authorizes modificationcf
the Comprehensive Manpower (C.E.T.A. ) Plan. A copy of the pro-
posed modifications is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit
"A" hereto.
SECTION 2 . This Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its adoption.
ADOPTED: December 17, 1974
ATTEST: APPROVED: w '"'
City Clerk Mayor
e
. .. .-.war'•, - •_ _w._
r r
•
•
•
.
1
• GRANT Nl/f/h(:r1
V.e. Ocr•AATNItt T Or LnnQn • Dl.n ro,••t ACmintstr•liuu
GRANT SIGNATURE "';�F'T 05-5-101-10__
• MUOIP•1CAT IoIN 1.U•Md+. H
• GOMYIAEIICrr1.I�•r. E�tILUYMi:2:T AJ:L iilAINING ClloGaAm •� --'-.I
- GHAe 1ti.
Grp 7----K i
U.S. . Department of Labor, :I.A • •Central Arkansas' Consortium ,
Federal iiuiidi.n7,, 7th Floor City 'Hall 1
1160 Co::::.:crc:: Strc: I Markham & Broadway Streets i
Dallas_,__:C�•<rtS '/5202 • I Little R�ls, Arkansas 72201. •
This grant is catered into by the United States of America, Department of Labor, Manpower Adrr.irustration,
hereinafter referred to as Grantor and !:ane of rn'e 3ponQ,/ ..0grCx.q..LAxkaT7,54.5...0415ortl_um
• • hereinafter rciecred to as Grantee. The Grantee acrees to o;.c:ate a.Cernpcehcns:ve 1.:::pioyrnent and Tratr,Ir.g
;r; this a^ ^^:r�rt. incieciin.; tit' ComrrehPr•n•rc• '1^*.^',r.: :?!in
Fray t co:l!I�nc^ vr.th the provisions n more. _ _
Program it ne
and such_gcnt';;J and spacial as -as a:c taclad.d l.t':c:r S_:` 'a:.;s and corva`ts er.tcndtnl o —
than one year beyond the term:nation D_.—..t f thts groat.ray Le entered info b' t i ci ntee.
A.GRANT PERIOD 07/05/74 • ' to —06/30/75
. This Grant agreement covers the period (Dore) fKxn . .
B.OBLIGATION
•
0 increases 0 decreases 0 does r.ot change
•
• .This action
the,' federal obligation for this grant by (this coma) 300, 2.5Q
� i0 (new kvtl) .fi....?a.t7.l..5.a. : •%/••••.•
C.TITLE'AND FISCAL YEAR —�
_ -----
TITLf•. 1975 I 1 o
l ...... •
1 7
,1�74•n:r.-r ,.... -..•v,-. .,
rL I J 2, 566, 915
2,515,590 51,325 i i
I 1
Incentive I
__ I 1
• Di'CrelinnSry 1 248, 925 I 248,925
(Summer)1 248, 925
�
ULE II 1 I i
• . Di+.-r tionary I
i iTLF. 1.l j j
I rn1 a1.`,...:--■J
t.tigraol 1 -...._- -J
Od,err I
- - - 1 i I ' 2,815,840
• TOTAL 1 ; •
Air aot'L'D }71t Til:. GII A• '1:
..---------------_ -.
1_ ArrnovcU t oit Ti'r Gr:ANtoit .
I- UV
VV i
I
Central Arkansas Consortium ____••___-_ 1
•�
'o .AND TSILC i
HA64: r•ND TITLE - ,
Carleton B. McMullin, City Manager
fr _
y1.; �AlViil. ( A L 1,.I;'•,•.Al VIIG 1� `I
I
I
1 ._1..—_. t•
,... . .
Page 1 of 14 pages
li......... - --
•
•
-2-
The applicant certifies that this modification has been
reviewed and approved by all members of the Consortium.
William H. Walters
Mayor, City of Little Rock
B. Frank Mackey
County Judge, Pulaski County
O. I .j
masse Carter
County Judge, Faulkner County
C.H. Benafield
County Judge, Lonoke County
H.W. Green
County Judge, Saline County
•
•
R`k:
-3-
MODIFICATION SHEET
Grant No. 05-5-101-10
Modification No.
GENERAL INTENT:
To modify the Title I grant to include unexpended fiscal year 1974 funds,
to include 1974 summer employment unexpended funds, to reflect actual first
quarter accomplishments, and to change the program narrative in the 1975
Comprehensive Manpower Plan.
MODIFICATION:
1. Page 4, Project Operating Plan, of this modification replaces Page 12,
Project Operating Plan, in the original grant.
2. Pages 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, Program Narrative Des-
cription, of this modification replaces Pages 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 23,
29, 30, 31, 32, Program Narrative Description, in the original grant.
3. This modification consists of:
a. Grant Signature Sheet
b. Modification Sheet
c. Project Operating Plan
d. Program Narrative Description
•
[ •.
•
l' •
..-.... +ar r u•.. .fie,-<-„ r, <.. �... ,. _. ... ...-.. ..._ _r
—4— •
V•a, ocrAnrMr!Nr O• Lnoon b. GAAN7 NUMBER a, GRANTEE'S NAME AND ADDRESS hlenpuw•r Adrnb,latr•tlon GflAN NUMOI
CENTRAL ARKANSAS CONSORTIUM cETn PROJECT OPERATING PLAN
CITY HALL • c. PROGRAM YEAR COVERED oY THIS GRANT a.TVPI. Or PROGRAM
MARKHAM & BROADWAY STS. (Atonal,Day, Year) LI 1•TRIe I 0 2.TRt. II
' LITTLE ROCK,ARKANSAS 72201 Frorni 07/05/74 Tot 06/30/75 0 3.Other Specify
PROGRAM YEAR-TO.OATE" PLAN
v .
I. ENROLLMENT AND TERMINATION SUMMARY 9/30 I 12/31 3/31 I 6/30
It) I 1!!I
I —CO- 1250 -
INDIV-- — -_of ------------- 1 1750_ 1__2_655 _I
A. TOTAL IN is Ent•ALS TO DE SE�7VED (Sum of A.1'ond A.2) 469 1-1250—'1' 1 750 i 2655
1. Individuals Cnlering This Program Year �_ 1- .1,...--.-••--.•"••"1^^T"•'•"---ll
2. Individuals Carried Over From Previous Program Year 1 -0 L....:.".:...a...::c ir.;.y :4':h:..at.;•••..•�••L••-�"•'-""""""'
__ 5 ;31')0 /'r' 1 1280
D. 1101:..INOIViount:.TO Dl:TI:DMINATCO DVfUNG PROGIWA YF.nl (Sum n/Ill Uirovlth'. 1 �Tr.e_, n.)
t1. Totes I:nlrrinq CmploYr^"lit
0 i 95 254 I 11118
a. OlrrcI Placements• No CETA Training or Employment 1 1 1 122 1 258 t 11,
N. Indirect Placement' Following CS:rA Traln{nq/Employment t
I 2 15 I 32 —I 5_2-
�
C. Self Placement 1 2 46 1 70 1 102
2. Other Pauline Terminations I; II_ 62_I` 11011 I 205
3. Non•PoaRlve Terminations - mom. D) 1 'ro'r 1 910 1—.1-0-27 101 I 1205
C. NO. INOIVIDUAIS. PLANNED TO Rc r3vROLLf.D AT TI+C L'NO OF EACH QUARTER (A
II. I;LANNI:O ENROLLMENTS IN PIlOGIlAM ACTIVITIES
'
Enter baOW CO Plena d to number of f•nr,oll•duln1 each program activity program end of activity quarter;an hnalvIdua`I who i+coneurr•ntly Thi enrolled In of.ore than on•
attivltV shOUld_De EOY,nted In cash acfIvltY In whirl he Or she IS enrolled, 3/31 6/30
9/30 I 12/31
- Total I Currently I Total I Currently Total Currently i •Total Currency
▪ PROGRAM ACTIVITY (I
Served Enrolled I Served Enrolled Served I Enrolled Served Enroued 1
(a) (b( I (n) I IDl 1 (a)�1 lb) (a) ( (.0)_=...,.....1
• I 218 I 216 1575 I 315 I 650 325 I 950 1 25 4
•
I
A. Classroom Trnq., Prime Sponsor I j � I
C. Classroom Trng., Voc.Ed. ( i 25 i 1 5 l 100 0 0 45 i 180 120
C, On•rne•!op Training
Q. ppblle Service Employment 750 j 530 (_1150 ; 880
E. wore. Experience 251 I 248 1 575 I 530 ; I 150 I
I 75 1 - 50 1 250 I 125 1 375 I
F. Other Activities F a
Ill.'-Vr!!.aAf1V FINANCIAL FLAN (r in Thourondr) IV. CUMULATIVE PROJECTIONS BY QUARTER OF FINANCIAL PLAN 3�J,n 7houro`�710
_ 12/31 I
• A.Total can funds aylUbl• durIng 2,815 (c) (d) J
Ws orogram year (a) 1 lb)• -(Sum of A.1 and A.2) ( I
• 1, Funds urrled In from prevloua _0_ 1 A. Prime Sponsor Obligations I 36 962 1888 2815 I
program Y•ar of other grant' I —�
'U.Total Projected Expenditures by ryotramj • 36 962 1888 I 2815 - 1
• 2 815 Racially, (See 111.10; (Sum of D.1
2. New Funding , Ihroucle D.6) '
1. Classroom Trng., Prime Sponsor ZZ I 393 I 764 I 1134 I
r D.Total prn)••aed expenditures for 2 815 1 44 I 88 132
MR Program yr.(u",m,of D.) Ow 0.61 s 2.. On•the•Job 7rnln{ng I
3. Public Service Employment I
1. nliminHVallon 563 j.`,; ; '�•+ j 14 I 103 I— 830 1241
-- n.work ExPeriencv I 103 I
206 I- 308 I
2. Allowance; 540 1:; .' yI •
3, wage I 8.81 •`•h.; 1 S. Services to Clients I >'
I n. rrin(re Denr is 1 106 1 , :I 6. Other Activities (�.— I "'—"—{
-- -417 ` ....;.. I
S. 7ralnlnp I,,,. f',j C. r4njecleA cx Penrlll ur et for Voc. Ed. In
{ Special Grants to Governor i. r
„Cervlees 1 --308 ...',...l.• :aril.
C.Total CI:CA funds to be carried D. Projected expenditures of non•Fcd.funds I �
Into next grant program yaat I
(A minor 11) -0- E. Oltxv P .h,r<K rr�l In Mme;Porno's Grant I I
�� F. GRAND TOTAL Projected Expendllurenl 36 962 I 1888 2815 i
I —... ,.••'��, ' '� (Sum of D, C, U, and fit I --•'f
•Y, 0.t(:NI1ICANT SEGMENTS.• Indicate the nr,mher of Individuals In each segment to be served cumulatively during the program year. Significant 1
�. segments may be specified by the Manpower Administration or the irime�SPOnsbr, 1 PROGRAM VCn R-70-DATE PLAN�I
rl PROGRAM VCn R•TO•DA7E PLAN _ —
I 9/30 12/31 I 3/31 GPO I SIGNIFICANT SEGMENTS 9/30 12/311 3/31 ` 6/30 j
• SIGNIFICANT ;FOMENTS 1 D 1 d—'•11
A. YOUTH (14-21) I 320 638 892 I 13541 F. I
n —ADULTS(22-114) I 132 525 735 I 11151 G. II___
c.45 8 OVER J 17 I 87 1 123 1 186 J H. I I 1 1___
D. VIETNAM VETERANS 102 I 275 385 I 5841 L I—' I
E D. OATS SIGNED
VI. OTHER ACTIVITIES (Reference 11,6;lV.D.61
VII. A. SIGNATURE
Indleal• nlhrf aeliellles or spneld programs on •rt•eh• DECEMBER 17, 1974
• manta. fleterlhe their obl•ellv•s and 11,1 mil•tton•+ 1
,^ward mars •chl•v•rnent In• Ou•ntlblave of n+rratly •
Mesenl•llon. (Opflonel) May 1q'/♦
MA 2..0.12 { ) •
•
a ,. a. - •r 't
-5-
As outlined in the section "Objectives and Needs for Assistance"
and other parts of this proposal, the entire program, other than those
services being provided to the 14-21 aged, in-school target group, is
aimed at immediate employment of participants in known job opportunities
in the area. All training will be geared toward effective career develop-
ment in those areas of skill shortages. In addition to participant
training, regardless of the nature of the training, emphasis will also
be placed on the elimination of artificial employment barriers and
continued participant upward mobility through productive employment.
C. APPROACH
1. Description of Planning System and Participation of Community
Based Organizations
The Planning system for CACETA evolved from two basic influences.
The first is the CETA Act itself along with the regulations presented
by the Secretary of Labor which interpret the purpose and limitations
of the federal legislation. The second is the sponsor's manpower
policy which was approved by the former MAPC council and by the
sponsor.
From these basic influences the sponsor initiated the planning
process through the existing Manpower Area Planning Council. The
Council included representatives from the entire four-county area
and consisted of the client community, community-based organizations,
the Employment Security Division, education and training agencies
and institutions, business and labor.
The Council is made of the following persons:
NAME SECTOR REPRESENTED
Mr. Robert E. Phillips Business
Ms. Erma Cunningham Council on Human Resources
Mr. Jeffery Hawkins Community Based Organization
Mr. Roland Smith Education
Mr. Charles Cunningham Council on Human Resources
Mr. Charles Price Employment Security Division
Mr. Tommy Nabholz Business
Mayor Dean Boswell Elected Official
Ms. Barbara Gazer Community Based Organization
Mr. Curtis Slay Client
Mr. Marquis Jones Public
Mr. Everett Tucker Business
Ms. Irene Williams Client
Reverend R. E. Maus Public
Mr. Karl Zimmerman Business
Ms. Jeane Lambie Labor
. • . . .
•
•• •.
-6-
The staff gathered and assimilated relevant statistical data
concerning the area' s labor force, employment trends, family income,
education levels, etc. plus a summary of the prior year's manpower
funding levels, and services delivery. This information was pre-
sented to the council on April 25. The council discussed the
information and made general recommendations concerning target group
priorities. At the same meeting the staff presented a broad outline
of the possible general delivery systems. The council agreed to
study the proposals for a few days and reconvene.
Throughout the whole planning process frequent liaison was
maintained between the council, the consortium members and the
administrative member via the planning staff. In the interval
between the aforementioned council sessions the staff consulted
with all present program deliverers and with all consortium members
or their representatives. The council met again on May 3, and
unanimously voted to recommend that the sponsor approve the first
proposed delivery system.
Ideally, the planning staff and council would have taken more
gradual steps in this stage of the planning process with the staff
providing appropriate information, submitting optional plans, re-
ceiving response from the council at each step, etc. However, time
limitation affected the frequency and intensity of council partici-
pation, diminishing the depth of council involvement in minor decision
making and specific facets of program design.
t •
-7-
Virtually all of the interested community based organizations
participated in the planning process via membership in the council
as may be seen in the list of members. However, these organizations
and others were consulted also by the staff in informal processes to
accumulate additional information and recommendations to be incorporated
in the plan. These other organizations include representatives of
Model Cities, health service deliverers, the state manpower planning
staff and various private manufacturing and other commercial employers.
(2) & (3) Statement of Strategy and Description of Programs:
The basic strategy for accomplishing CACETA goals is contained in a
three component delivery system including (1) Training for Upward (TRUPMO),
(2) Comprehensive Training and (3) Special Training Services (STC) . The
following outline and chart indicate the general strategy and describe the
activities and services of the components.
I. TRAINING FOR UPWARD MOBILITY (TRUPMO)
A. YOUTH IN SCHOOL:
TARGET GROUP: Economically disadvantaged High School and Jr,
High School students aged 14-21, especially
potential drop-outs and dropouts.
PURPOSE: Facilitate completion of High•School with supple-
mentary incentives of earned income and work-train-
ing experience which will ultimately enhance job
opportunities.
OPERATION: Similar to former NYC In-School except that
dropouts returning to school may be permitted
to work as many as 18 hours per week. School
seasons will not affect enrollment except that
the number of work hours may be increased during
summer months and additional participants will
be served.
•
-8-
B. ADULTS AND YOUTH OUT OF SCHOOL:
TARGET GROUP: Economically disadvantaged unemployed and
underemployed persons aged 17 and above.
PURPOSE: Provide opportunity for target group persons
to train for upward mobility while simultaneously
receiving paid work experience directed toward
permanent jobs in the local labor market. Work-
training employers and the assignments will be
non-profit motivated though training would aim
toward ultimate employment with both profit and
non-profit employers.
OPERATION: Combine advantages of former Mainstream, NYC
Out-of-School and New Careers type programs.
Participants wages will be subsidized for limited
time periods depending on the nature of job
training, with a maximum period of 6 months.
The sub-contractor for delivering the services of TRUPMO will be EOA
of Pulaski County, chosen because of its several years experience with
NYC I/S, NYC 0/S, Operation Mainstream and New Careers programs. Also,
the sub-contractor presently sponsors outlying "neighborhood centers"
which are closely identified with target group persons of the local
communities. These centers should be valuable to the program, especially
recruitment.
II. COMPREHENSIVE TRAINING
TARGET GROUP: Economically disadvantaged persons aged 17 years
and above who need skill training, basic or remedial
education and motivational training or some of these
services to acquire suitable employment.
PURPOSE: Provide the services mentioned above for target
group persons to enhance adequate job opportunities
and earning power and to provide job development
and placement services following training.
OPERATION:
The administrative arm, with approval by the Consortium, proposes,
through a Comprehensive Training Component drawing on present resources
available in both the Skills Center and OIC. The component will provide
•
F
-9-
participants with additional crossover mixes of manual-mental, educational,
motivational, pre-vocational, academic, and vocational skills. Adult
education and GED instruction will be provided at the Center's location
and will be directly related to the skill training program.
In an effort to assure comprehensive delivery and provide the maximum
number of training slots and thereby serve the greatest possible number,
the Consortium proposes to sub-contract for two separate programs or
projects through the component. The negotiations will stipulate that
both OIC and the Skills Center remain operative with the two programs pro-
viding support to each other in the selection of skill training areas to be
provided. Recruitment, assessment, intake, counseling job development and
placement for the Skill Center will be contracted to Employment Security
Division.
As required by the CETA regulations, the Consortium must provide for
a "unified payment allowance" system for all participants within a parti-
cular program. The Consortium proposes to directly operate the allowance
payment system for enrollees attending the Central Arkansas Skill Center.
The allowance schedules will be outlined as required by the regulations.
Basic allowances, dependent allowances, and incentive allowances will
continue to be paid to CETA participants who are served by what was formerly
known as the MDTA Skill Center, however, waiver of allowances will be
negotiated with any other agency providing training, specifically OIC. This
will allow maximum services. Linkage will be maintained with the State
Unemployment Insurance Division and the Welfare agencies. Appeal procedures
for non-receipt of such payments will be developed as outlined in the
regulations.
.ti
-10-
III. SPECIAL TRAINING SERVICES (STS)
TARGET GROUP: Economically disadvantaged, underemployed, and
unemployed persons aged 17 and above provide
training services to the extent possible for
participants through "buy-in" arrangements with
more accessible training facilities including
vocational-technical schools and private employer-
trainers throughout the four county area.
OPERATION: Sponsor negotiates with both formal training insti-
tutions and prospective delivers to provide "less
than class", "on-job-training", and manpower services
for participants. Probable and/or possible contract
agencies include Urban League, ESD/JOPS, NAB/JOBS, and
VO-Tech schools in outlying areas.
SERVICES TO CACETA PARTICIPANTS
TRAINING FOR UPWARD MOBILITY COMPREHENSIVE TRAINING SPECIAL TRAINING SERVICES
RECRUITING RECRUITING RECRUITING
SCREENING SCREENING SCREENING
ENROLLMENT ENROLLMENT ENROLLMENT
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
EMPLOYABILITY PLAN EMPLOYABILITY PLAN EMPLOYABILITY PLAN
WORK-TRAINING ASSIGIvIENT SPECIFIC SKILL TRAINING SKILL TRAINING OR ON-JOB-
' (IN COOP. WITH USER-AGENT PERIODIC PROGRESS EVALUATION TRAINING
PERIODIC PROGRESS EVALUATION TRAINING CERTIFICATION PERIODIC PROGRESS EVALUATION
LIAISON WITH SUPERVISOR PLACEMENT LIAISON WITH SUPERVISOR OR
{ PLACEMENT POST TERMMINATION FOLLOW-UP TRAINING AGENCY
POST TERMINATION FOLLOW-UP AND REPORTING PLACEMENT
AND REPORTING POST TERMINATION FOLLOW-UP
AND REPORTING
.
OTHER SERVICES
GENERAL
ASSESSMENT &
REFERRAL: All contractors will cooperate with ESD by requesting
referrals, general assessment information and providing
relevant information for placement assistance.
ICOUNSELING: Individual counseling will accompany all of the services
to participants from recruiting through follow-up. In
the outlying counties, counselors will serve participants
in all programs. In Little Rock and Pulaski County
counselors will specialize in one of the programs.
ill--
11!:' *
-11-
FINANCIAL: A unified fiscal accounting and delivery system
will serve the total CACETA program. The system
will be under the general control of the City of
Little Rock but may be subcontracted to program
operators. It will include timesheet processing,
payrolling of staff and participants, operational
expense accounting, wages, allowances, etc.
MISCELLANEOUS: Various other services may be provided to participants
throughout the system which are not charted as fixed
items because of their miscellaneous nature. They
include transportation, minor health services, etc.
(4) Recruiting, etc.
Primary responsibility for recruiting, selecting and determining eligibility
of participants will be with each contracted deliverer, however, in outlying
counties the CACETA representative will provide additional support for all
components. In all counties all representatives of CACETA will serve as ex-
office recruiters for the total program.
Newspapers, radio and television stations, public school announcements and
posters, civic organizations and any other appropriate media will be employed to
disseminate information concerning the program.
(5) Limited English-Speaking
Persons of limited english-speaking ability do not comprise a significant
portion of the population.
(6) Consideration of Demonstrated Effectiveness
Thorough consideration has been given to all manpower programs of demon-
strated effectiveness in the design of the new program. The basic activities
of NYC In-School, Out-of-School, Summer NYC, Mainstream and New Careers are
incorporated in the TRUPMO (Training for Upward Mobility) component. The basic
advantages of the Skill Center and OIC are incorporated in the Comprehensive
Training component.
•
;,: }
tit
• f
-12-
(7) & (8) Administrative System
The prime sponsor 's administrative and management system, as shown in
the organizational chart on the following page, will consist of planning,
monitoring and evaluation, operations, and fiscal components.
The planning and evaluation component, consisting of three manpower
planners, will be responsible to the program director and will provide
operational monitoring and evaluation in addition to providing the technical
staff support for the Manpower Planning Council. The responsibilities of this
component will further include management information requirements and maintenance
of an efficient reporting system. The City of Little Rock has operated under
CAMPS, MAPC, and the OPG and in doing so, has formulated experience and expertise
in program planning and evaluation. This component will also be responsible for
any required in-service staff training and EEO compliance.
The overall centralized fiscal component, in addition to the allowance payment
system, will be placed within the Finance Department of the Administrative Arm.
All fiscal coordination and monitoring will be provided by the central system.
Program component subcontractors will handle their own fiscal operations and feed
required information into the central system with the exception of the training
allowances for institutional training.
The component specialists will provide a constant link between the admini-
strative arm and each sub-contractor. Each specialist will be primarily respon-
sible for specific component operational effectiveness. The four outreach/
counselors will be responsible for outreach, assessment, referral, counseling,
job development, and placement efforts in each of the four counties. They will
be responsible for the overall coordination of various component efforts in each
respective county.
•4
-13-
All administrative personnel employed by the administrative arm will
be employed through the City of Little Rock's personnel department based
on principles of merit and qualifications. Job descriptions will be
developed and selection standards created in line with modern personnel
practices and standards prior to the selection of personnel. Presently, the
administrative arm of the sponsor, the City of Little Rock, has a IPA
representative from the U.S . Civil Service Commission developing an Affirmative
Action Plan. Attached is an ordinance prohibiting discrimination in all personnel
actions.
ORGANIZATION CHART
Manpower Programs Department:
DIRECTOR
ASST. DIRECTOR
MANPOWER ACCOUNTANT
PLANNERS (3)
•
EEO SECRETARY ACCOUNT CLERK
COORDINATOR
CLERK
TYPISTS (2)
WORK COMPREHENSIVE OUTREACH
EXPERIENCE TRAINING COUNSELORS
SPECIALIST SPECIALIST (4)
-14-
(9) Accounting for Placements
Each program component will have responsibility for follow-up
of its participants to determine the success of the system at meeting
their needs in relationship to job placement, earning capacity and
vocational permanence. Follow-up information will be gathered and re-
,I ported after the participant has been terminated for six months. All
erform a participant follow-
program delivery agents will be required to p
up within the seventh month after placement and report in writing to the
prime sponsor.
(10) Selection of Delivery Agents
• The sponsor chose program delivery agents on the basis of their
experience and evaluation made by
the MAPC council and its staff, parti-
cularly in recent months. The sponsor felt that no other agencies in the area
could offer proven capability for meeting the needs of the target groups better
than those which were selected. The delivery agents chosen are the only
presently existing agencies with experience in the delivery of similar
categorical program sponsors through the 1J .S. Department
services, having been g
of Labor. The time restriction, resulting from the date of receipt of
regulations as it related to plan submission date,
further complicated the
process of selecting delivery agents. The sponsor does, however, project
lengthly selection processes for FY 1976.
(11) Special Vocational Education Grants
The sponsor is still in the process of negotiating with state government
for an appropriate percentage of special grant funds for vocational education
to be used in the CACETA area. These funds will be applied to the Comprehensive
rainin component and Special Services component. A copy of the proposed
T g
•cc_:c;;t
{, :;tt:;C1I I to the plan.
::