4623 •
RESOLUTION NO. 4,623
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE
SECOND YEAR ACTION PROGRAM AND THE BUDGET
THEREFOR FOR THE MODEL NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE
CITY ' S COMPREHENSIVE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.
WHEREAS , the comprehensive city demonstration program (herein
referred to as the "Comprehensive Program" ) for the model neighborhood
of the City of Little Rock was approved by resolution adopted March
2, 1970; and
WHEREAS , a grant agreement with the United States of America
was executed on June 24, 1970 providing for Federal financial
assistance under Title I of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act of 1966; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Program were approved
by resolutions adopted December 17 , 1970 and June 14, .171= and
WHEREAS the submission to the Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development (herein called the "Secretary" ) of a proposed Se-cond
Year Action Program, amending the said Comprehensive Program, was
authorized by resolution adopted May 3, 1971; and
WHEREAS the Secretary has approved a Second Year Action Program
and has tendered a revised grant budget providing for an additional
grant.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS THAT:
SECTION 1. The Second Year Action Program (which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof) including the projects and activities
described herein and set forth in the revised grant budget tendered
by the Secretary, is hereby approved and the Comprehensive Program
is deemed amended thereby.
SECTION 2 . The City Manager is authorized to accept the
revised grant budget (which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof) .
r
• -
4
SECTION 3 . The Board of Directors assumes full responsibility
for assuring that all grant funds will be used in an economical and
efficient manner in carrying out the Comprehensive Program, as
amended, and assures the necessary non-Federal share of the cost
of Program Administration.
SECTION 4. The City Manager is authorized to do all things
necessary to carry out the Comprehensive Program, including the
submission of such reports, certifications, and other material as
the Secretary shall require and the approval from time to time
of revisions in the grant budget, including revisions which increase
the total Federal grant and the necessary non-Federal share of the
cost of Program Administration.
SECTION 5 . The Director of Finance or his successor or delegate
may do all things required to be done in order to obtain payment
of the grant, including but not limited to the selection of a
commercial bank to receive payment vouchers, the submission of
signature specimens, and the filing of requests for payment.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect
from and after its adoption.
ADOPTED: July 6, 1971
AT TESTo APPROVED:
Alte34122/ AlliArld44414441
Mayor
F
m z n.
W Q
Ill 1. u
0 cr
Z W U v
>
I- .y- ul in 00 N 0 CT 0 CO O 0 0 n )/l O\ - E o
F- 0 C•l O CO Ul - 0-1 CO ■O CO cc 0 in O a' u
la CO � N N (N .-"+ N- .-a c CO 't1„... 1 h
�) 3 M .-1 M 0 1 Q ! c
«- r 0 D u F~ a v
2 U : v
Q a
CV ICpl CV CV CV CV CV CV (V CV CV CV CV • lV M U. _c >
1 r 0 <7 s .n
�v
11'F Z Z . u
c
a ; m
;J c > u a
T. N O 0 c
C
O I a n 0
O O a a u I a u _c
C`1 Q V `
z U 0 J O
o c
Q a 7 E u
I-
0 _ _
o
Z F a o •.. E
0
O a "
U W c o
, v
I Q 0 0 d
W W F o o L ed
Q Z u v c
O 0 o
Q
CI
F
z
- ) (7) v a w -9
o
Ctl U 2 u u
O 0 I 1 a Z
.N ° u
a W J c a
2 Q L oa U
O Q F u o
Z 0 CO
D u
> 0 0 o m
'. 0 W 0 u
- N v « J
U > •- u
a (I) w o 0
-1 ' a
O r � W '-1.1 C F °-
o .°
.0 W 0 N
2 '
C
Z
.• V
Q > u v
W a
>- u « .
O F N 0 M cc 0 0 to 0 0 0 ,-4 n .-1 � CO N u `
o`
z 0 0 a0 0 co N- 0 cc N- � In 0 « •_`
O F Ol N .--I N ■-a ,--1 V n .-I 01 W .- c o
U n n n Q V
W r-■ ,-I .--1 j (j 0
,n CO- O o D
..' E
W U E
N F' ,--1 a - D
��`,- oQ ,- r-+ u E
y I- Ol f u o x
J z E
w p
J f 0 o D «
LD O _
4 w J O 0 v
u
F U >p ¢ N v N n 0 Ol IT) CO 0 O Ol 0 0 .-+ N
US
O 0 ON N CO '--I f- N CO c0 O 0-1 .-I Ol 0 0• a u
Q F O> 5--1 5-4 N. .-4 Ol -
oa a
CC U
i� ,--I .--a .---1 5_4 . U C,
Z U 1 G v• o II
c C cc w N. co "' E 0
s E
.0 0 > 'T C O^ J ° F-
> On 0 Ol N Q 0 1 4J _ « Z
Q Q Z r-1 ' U v U � CC
I U O 0 .
G.
a w
Z 0 a `o>
7 -- W J ^ Z 0 r-..-
0. c . m
N r- r > .n Q
L .- a
, F 0 0 ■0 Ol N CO ,-I c0 l0 al if) N- M O - - •Z —J
F- Ol r-1 r-I Ol 'N Ol 0 c y O Q n n _7 V n
_J
om
i • LL <0- ,---.1 .--a u v >U
u
w (Y.
Z X D• w 0 > , 7_':
_< W O Q f� N F , - 7 .c
0 r4 U U Q c t n s
O F LL U,J o
J W z v r— 0 = _>Q�
Z V' a co 1,, ' ~
U
o m a O _nil � Q .
U d J- o
,
▪ N vl 0 ,fl 0 N 0 0 ^ 0 al 0 r-+ 0 I a ° c
J co a I- O 10 N N N CO �0 c0 in r"+ M 7 F- ` 2 5--_Y
z 0
Ol r-+ Cl 5-4 CO c0 N 00 c °
M.... - F- n • n �'�,' U n v
= Z cc ,-1 r-I r-4 - u °
w Q a} m
0 ° -
- V u
Z Z
a
7 i �",
a
,c 0 °
a
a, U Cr D-1
F-- tea, E M 2-
( -' E o Z N c_ c > ° ° °
CL • d 4 U c o O U H
w -p H a. •,..f a, a - -D W I- ` -'
o c• N1 1, 7 E > p C > a( US °
CL,I ? c O V O c CC)A J V 7'-
_ 41 _ •c c o a.0 7 o V
N u O , _c
U E a a>i d E c E •° a ,c U --
a E, o, r-I N 0 C N O ,p o �- _c:6 c
X it•- J al c _o .n U 0 O a, n x ,_
4 . c 0 U VI > > -i CO • 0- a J c -C W = 0
U lj J CO °C U c c -0 o O 1. - o F- F F- Z .c '"
a a, O -0 O > r_ r
t ; ° c
E (,) O co v o C� U o ` .- E c>_ d o m 1„0 t3_r. o
0 F- - •5/) LT, C) 2 D F o - f-
s -- 0 3 E c i) Ni ` u c u .n O W �
L ti ll V .. CL c .n 0 c ._ > 1 -_ 0) F- . .-"0) ..-
7 0 U F- C O :J -_ `3 > N U O c, J
` W Z v, ce U = W 3_ cr. F- UJ U W
EXHIBIT A-1
(Attachment to Revised Grant Budget)
If duplicate Federal funding becomes available to the City
for similar purposes for any portion of the time provided
for in this grant agreement, HUD reserves the right to terminate
that portion of the grant allocable to the period of time after
such duplicate Federal funding becomes available. In determining
the portion of the grant so allocable, it is assumed that
eligible expenses should be incurred (except for funds obligated
to capital projects) at a rate of approximately 1/12 per month.
a MODEL CITIES
r FORM APPROVED
BUDGET BVRE AU NV. C7-HI21'
• CITY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Little TRock ER DATE
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET ME-03-0c May 1, 1971
BUDGET SUMMARY /} + /2-- REVISED ACTION YEARS
/J GI Vl� FROM TO:
FOriginol Submission [ ]RevisiAn No:
1 July 1, 1971 June 30, 1972
(ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND)C VM `•-
CURRENT REQUESTED FUNDS TOTAL nVE TOTAL
PRIOR (c,,/.A MC GRANT
CATEGORY APPROVED NON HUD MC FUNDS cVNDS
COO( PROGRAM CATEGORY YEARS BUDGET. MC r�6)
NUMBER MC GRANT - (COt-i '31
MC GRANT GRANT FEDERAL ST ATE LOCAL
FUNDS FUNDS
166}
l31 (4)1
It 1726
Io Education 0 195 240 1,371 0 115 , 1
Health 0 22 183 0 0 0 183 205 •
p 1 295 288
®Social Services
0 87 201 93
0 36 52
to Recreation —Culture 16 36 0 0 �MIIII l•___
IT Crime — Delinquency '
Manpower and Job 0 79 170 2,604 38
0 2,812 249
20 Development
IIIIIII Economic atd Business p 25 105 350
0 0 455 130
Development .
—'--� 0 0 1,500 88
3o Housing
0 88 0 1,500
31 Relocation 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 60
Tronsportotion — 0 0 0 0 0
u 0 0 0
Communlcotron
Environmental Protection 0 1 1C9 671 1,768 0 0 2 439 780
ic
Uond2! bopmeh1t 67
40/ Citizen Participation 0
0 67 0 0 0 67
va vation on. 0 76 101
1 ,a 71 0
Information 0 11111-
SUBTOTAL 0 1,711 1 ,744 7,686 38 121 9,589 1 3,455
so Program Administration 0 191 158 0
40 198 349
GRAND TOTAL
0 _ 1,902 1,902 7 ,686 38 161 9,787 3,804
CLEARANCE SECTION HUD APPROVAL
CITY
Approved Total
Grant A,/mount : S p ,
It is hereby certified that City budgeting prOCII r;have been
on followed and on fell
ile
(uNilrcetIOns and boCk•uo motePol required by pursuant in the Vrcnt Agreement. ---------------"g'--
�• ��nntur�l
with 1,e Clt and Is ovoilclle or Inspectir M+_.
SIGN = E AffO/�' E OF CIT c CH EF1 FIy ^AL OFFS'ER
S BMWION AUTHO 17,,- ION: / y`..� /
' , • i ���� TITLE i F °^r '.1-11E, EXECUTIVE OFFICER
DATE 7/ y'/4A 7�
HUO.7044 (2.70) Pr.,. •••••onis obsol•t•
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
FORM APPROVED
r BUDGET RUBE•U NO. 61-81211
U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED ACTION YEAR
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET /ROM: TO:
FUNDING July 1, 1971 [June 30, 1972
CITY
Little Rock
TABLE A - SUMMARY OF LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS
LOCAL CONTRIBUTION
HUD
FUNDING SUMMARY CASH IN-KIND TOTAL OTHER MC FUNDS TOTAL
($000) ($000) ($000/ ($000)
(1000) (1000)
(II
12) ___ 13) PIP (S1 (Q1_ 171
Program Administrotion 17 23 40 0 158 198
Capital Projects and — '
Activities 121 0 121 0 1,744 1,865
TOTAL 138 23 161
0 1,902 2,063
TABLE B
(Status of MC Grant Funds Cumulative through the Requested .4etion Year)
OBLIGATIONS'
MC GRANT AMOUNTS
,
PRIOR YEAR REQUESTED CUMULATIVE i ADDITIONAL
CURRENT
CUMULATIVE ACTION TOTAL THROUGH LATEST) MC GRANT
YEAR
ACTUAL ESTIMATE YEAR (Cols. 1+2+3) MC GRANT REQUESTED ACTION
1 ESTIMATE BUDGET YEAR
(s) 121
(31 (4)- . 16) 161
0 1,902 1,902 3,804 1,902 0
h
RECAPITULATION:
7. Cumulative MC Grants through requested action year (cols. 5+6) . . . $ 1,902
8. Total obligations through requested action year (col. 4) . , , , 3,804
i 9. Estimated unobligoted balances at end of requested action year . . .
0 •
TABLE C
(Comparison of Obligations and Expenditures of:Model Cities Grant Funds Through Requesqted Action Year)
I
EXPENDITURES 2
1 MC GRANT OP.LIGA TIONS
PRIOR YEARS CUMULATIVE THORUGH
CURRENT REQUESTED
CUMULATIVE YEAR TOTAL REQUESTED
ACTION YEAR Cola. 1+2+3) ACTION YEAR
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
ESTIMATE
III 121 (31 U I (From table R, Col. 4)
161
0 1,902 1,902 3,804 3,804
RECAPITULATION:
6. Cumulative MC Grant obligations through requested action year (Col. 5) $ 3,804
7. MC Grant expenditures through requested action year (Col. 4) - 3,8Q4
8, Estimated unexpended obligations of end of requested action year 0
1
Obligations. The term "Obligation" used herein refers to firm commitments by the City to on expenditure of funds. It refers to °mount of
funds commited under all executed contracts (or memorandums of understanding) with third party operating agencies. With respect to odmin.
iteration expenses and projects operated by the CDA staff, it refers to the funds budgeted and eormarked for expenditure for such activities.
1
Expenditures. The term "expenditures" as used herein refers to disbursements of Model Cities Grant funds mode by the City to on opera.
ring agency or contractor or payments mode for other eligible expenses incurred in operating the approved Comprehensive Demonstration
'rogrom In accordance with an approved Grant Budget.
HUI.7044.1 (2.70) HUD.Mesh.,D.C. 247178
MODEL CITIES
U.S. DEPARTMENT F onM APn Ov 0
OF HOUSING AND URBAN OEV eUOGE t euR(• Np. 1).n•+.
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little c'Ty
Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROJECT BUDGET
PgOGgAM CATF GOgY
HUD PROJECT 'ALL FIGI`i,� TH Education ''
USE UVSA NOS ROUNDED TO TrtE TITLE t
PRIOR CIIRHFNT NEAREST THDVSANDI
ONLY E YEARS
APPROVED RE VUESTFfrc
MC'GRANT BUOGE� OS
/tt fUNOg M FIGiRA T I MC GRANT2 NON MC GRANT FUNDS L
TOGA
121 /3' 1e' (St FEDERAL 57ATE LOCAL ((-^f b/
.16o• I '661
6r
Teacher Aide 0
I 51 80
300 0 115 495
I
I
7-7
Pre-school 0 144 44 132 0 0 I
• i 176
I
I ,
Day Care 0 0 10 I I
0 I i
105 125 0
I I 230
I
Home Educators I �
0 0 11 32
I I 0 0 43
Talent Search 0 0 1
0 103 0 0 1 103
I
•
I I
ESEA Title I
I 1
0 0 0 679 0 0 679
i I
,
1
GRAND TOTAL O L
195 I 240 0
ICoprrol Protects must be identified by underlining the Protect Title. Prior 115 1,726
resew o detected;lust identified and construction liig the Poor budget for each prole(' iv
°' t° stars of construction, the CDA must hate on hle lot possible HUO
gvenr Phan a orders) which must hove been rev ewed and oCPro.ed by the City's DOrred by specilicorions and result 1
Agency'5 Tgechn,col Staff. At the rime of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hove budget estimetes developedoinYoccordonce i yy,rh locos cop�rol budgehn9 procrue, and these etltmotes shall y s En9rneer, o gva'.tlud engtnernns cnns�,fronr or the ODerohng
be retained on iile by the City for possible HUD review.
2 Any proposed use ,o conrroct and consullont services in on activity sholl be justified by o narrative statement setting forth the service to be '
endered unoer, the control and the bows for the cosi estimate. The statement shall be tncleded as part of the opprorre work program.
HU7040f4 701 Pr•yrovs edtnon rs obsolete pto I
)•
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
• vertV6. Vs I Mal, _.....
• `• teonm •OPUOyEO
oUtnGET eugE•U NO. a]-n'- •
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CIT!
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM (•TFGOAY
Health
IALL FIGURES 'N THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE MEANEST TROUSANDr
MUD PROJECT
USE PRIOR CURRENT
ONLY TITLE1 YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2� TOTAL
FUNOS II FEDERAL STATE LOCAL tr"1 1 •• 61
I11 121
'3' i•l 151 '
150. •6b:
East End
Health Clinic 0 0 183 0 0 0 183
I
Interim Medical 0 22
. 0 0 0 0 0
GRAND TOTAL 0 22. 22 183 0 0 0 183
y
'Capitol Protects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. P110110 start of construction, the CDA must hove on file for possible MUD
review o detoiled copltol acquisition and construction cost budget for eoch protect supported by specifications and drawings fond any subse-
quent chonge orders) which must hove been rev•ewed and opproved by the City's Engineer, a qualified engineering consultant or me Operating
lgency•s Techinicol Stoll. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hove budget estimates developed in accordance
with local copltol budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on lilt by the City for possiole MUD review.
2 ny proposed use to contract and consultant services in on activity shall be fustified by o norrotive statement selling forth the service to be
tendered under the contract and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included os port of the oppraprtote work program.
f.
NUD•704014.70) Previous edition is obsolete
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
'
•ORM APPPOVIEO
PUOCEy EUR[•U NO. g,-P'1'•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CIT e
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM E•TE Goa i
Social Services
r
HUD IALL FIGURES 'N THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND.
USE PROJECT PRIOR j CURRENT
TITLE I YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
ONLY MC GRANT OVOGE T.
MC GRANT M 2 NON MC GRANT FENDS TOTAL
FUNDS C GRANT I L
�
� FUNDS I FEDERAL ) STATE LOCAL (('t7 t ' hl
Ill ,2i '3t ■el t
1Si I 6a. '6b'
t I '6C'
I I 1
South End
Family Service
Center 0 74 164 I 0 0 0
164
I I 1 1
Mayor's Council
I I I 1
on Youth
•
Opportunity 0 • 3 3 18 0 1 22
I i
Branch Library 0 6 9 0 0 0
9
Second - Year
Senior Citizens 0 0 25 75 0
0 100
I
•
First - Year
Senior Citizens 0 4 0 0
0 0 0
- I
i
1
1
GRAND TOTAL 7 0 -.------0 7 201 93 0
1 i 295
Capitol Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Ptior to slot,of construction, the CDA must hove on lile for passible HUD
review o detorled capitol acquisition and consttuction cost budget for each protect supported by specifications and drowings(and ony subse-
quent chop a orders) which must have been ev ewed and opproved by the City's Engineer, a qualified engineering consultant or the Operoting
Agency's Techinicol Stoll. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hove budget estimates developed in accordance
with local capitol budgeting practice, and Ih•s• estimates shall be retained on file by the City lot possible HUD review.
2 1ny proposed use to controci and consultant services in on activity shall be 'vilified by a norrotive statement setting forth the service to be
endereo under the contract and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement sholl be included os part of the appropriate work program,
HUD•704014.701 Previous edition is obsolete
, CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
MODEL CITIES -
,
` .0.. •PD OVED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Buocr_e avnE•u Ho ss-.•f•
C r T v
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET 1` Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROJECT BUDGET I PRO GRAN E•TEGOR•r
1 Recreation and Culture
HUD I ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND,
USE PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT J
ONLY TITLES YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MC GRANT FUNDS ��
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT TOTAL
Itt-' t
FUNDS FEDERAL ( STATE i LOCAL ("I r • h/
2) a f
(Si ISI 60. '6b: '6c. 'T••
i 1 ■
Youth Activities 0 0 26 0
0 0 26
Visual Arts I I
0 0 10 0 0 0 10
Arkans s J
Arts Center 0 7 0 0 0 0
0
/
Recreation 0 9 0 0 0 0
0
. t '
I
.
. I
1
•
GRAND TOTAL 1 0 lb 36 0 0 0 36
I Cop�tol Proieus must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove on hle for possible HUD
review o detailed copitol ofQuisUron ond construction cost budget for each protect supported by specifications and drawings fond any subse-
9quent chopyye orders)which must hone been ,crewed and approved by the City.s Enginetr, o guol,l,ed engineering consultant or ,he Oprrotng
Agency's Tech,nicaf Stoll, A, the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hove budget estrmotes deve'oped in accordance
orb local capitol budgeting practice, ond these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible HUD review.
2 'ny proposed use to controc, and consultant services in on activity shall be justified by o norrotrve s,otement selling forth the service to be
rendered under the contract and the bosis for the cost estimate. The stotement shell be included as port of the opptopriote work program.
HUD-7010(1.70) Previous edition is obsolete j
, CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
wee. VI 1 IG4'
•
• FOAM ••PNovEO
•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT euocE* eUwE•V NO. es-.•1•
CITY
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
• PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM i CATEGORY
Crime and Deliquency
HUD CALL FIGURES IN 7NOUSA NOS ROUN
USE PROJECT DEO 70 THE NEAREST TH
PRIOR CURRENT OUSAND,
ONLY TITLE YEARS APPROVED REOUESTEO FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT= NON MC GRANT FUNDS
TOTAL
III ® FUNDS_ FEDERAL STATE
LOCAL ((.,,/ i . b/
el
111111WWITIMIIMI
7i
None
En .
Milli 1111111".111111
11 11111
MIMI .
GRAND TOTAL _
Capitol Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title, Prior to start of construction, the CDA must have on file for possible
review a detailed capitol acquisition and construction cost budget for each project supported
quenr chop a orders) which must hove been rev•ewed and approved by the City's Engineer, a p HUD
Agency's Tcopitoical Stoll. At the lime of submission of this budge schedule, it is necessary to shove budget eestimotesudeveiopedhinOacco dance
rich local capitol budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible MUD review,
2 `ny proposed use to contract and consultant services in an activity shall be justified by o no/relive statement setting forth the service to be
tendered under the contract and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included as port of the appropriate work program.
HUD•70e0(4.70) Previous edition is obsolete
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
i•rvvLS.. VI 1 !C.7 .. .. . _.
` H.
rolrr,a •PDROvED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT evoecr eUne•i No s)_0 t
C I T Y
t CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET PaD Little- Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET
I Mannower and Job Development
MUD
1 )ALL FIGURES tN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TROUSANOI
USE PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT
TITLE YEARS APP I REGuE57E0 FUNDS•ONLY MC GRANT DUOGE T, f r
FUNDS
MC GRANT NC GRANT NON MC GRANT FUNDS I TOTAL
111-' t2i FUNDS I FEDERAL STATE LOCAL I("1 6'
')I ■et
1St i60. '6b! r
■
'6Cr � T,
Adult Education
Scholarships 0 0 ' 11 0 0
0 11
Scholarship Loan I I
and Grant Fund
0
•
0 15. 0 0 i 0 15
jj
I i
COP in Nursing 0 0 144 0 0 0 144
.
` t
W I N 0 0
0 155 38 ( 0 193
•
New Careers
(EOA) 0 0 0 485 0 0 1 485
I f
New Careers
(City) i 0 0 0 95 0 0 95
NYC
(School District) 0 0 0 379 0 0 379
GRAND TOTAL CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
Capitol Protects must be identified by underlining the Protect Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove on file for possible HUD y
review a detoiled capitol ocqutsition and construction cost budget for each protect supported by specifications and drawings(and any subse•
quent change orders) which must hove been rev'ewed and approved by the City's Engineer, o qualified engineering consultant or the Operating
Agency's Techinicol Stall. Al the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to have budget estimates developed in accordance
vith local capitol budgeting proctice, and these estimotei shall be retotned on file by this City for possible HUD review.
2 `ny proposed use to contract and consultant services in an activity sholl be Justified by o narrative stoternent setting forth the service to be
rendered under the contract and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included os port of the appropriate work program.
NUD•70e014.70) Previous edition is oosolete
• CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
MODEL CITIES
FORM •PPROVCO
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT nuncF* e,wE•� rro ss.w•z
icivi,
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET PROORAMC ATE GORY
Manpower and Job Development
HUD I
ALL FIGURES •N THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND,
USE PROJECT
PRIOR CURRENT j
ONLY TITLE t YEARS APPROVED ( REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET,
II
FUNOS MC GRANT MC GRANT 2t NON MC GRANT FUNDS i TOTAL
It■-, r FUNDS_ I 1 FEDERAL r STAT
ZI t1' .t1 E LOCAL �(.,tf -; fit
ISr iga' 'sb' I ,6rr
•
7.
i
NYC II
•
(City) 0 0 0 181 0 0
. I 181
t r +
_ I
Manpower Develop-
ment Training Act 0 0
0 1,309 0 0 1,309
I l
I I
Comprehensive
Manpower 0 1 39 0 0 0 0 0
CDA Letter I/ 11 0 40 0 0 1 0 0 0
i
GRAND TOTAL 0 79 170 2,604
38 0 12, 812
(Capitol Protects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must have on file for possible HUD
review o detailed capitol ocquisirion and construction cost budget lot each protect supported by specifications and drawings(and any subs&
gvent change orders) which must hove been rev•ewed and approved by the City's Engineer, a qualified engineering consultant or the Operating
Agency's Techintcol Stall. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hove budget estimates developed in occordonce
with local capitol budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be returned on lila by the City for possible HUD review,
2 Sny proposed use to contract and consultant services in on activity shall bre justified by a narrative statement setting forth the service to be
rendered under the contract and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included as poet of the appropriate worts progtom.
HUD•104014.70) Previous edition is obsol.t.
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AN yOrtM •PoleOvE0
OURBANDEV �Ciir suocsr n ,of.uNO .s_.•:••
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGcTDPMENT Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT 3l,'DGcT I
r'A OGAAM C.it GOP r I
•
•
HUD
Economic & Business f
'ALL FtGUnES IN TN Development'
USE pROJlCT OVSA NOS gpUrrDED T
t PRIOR CURRENT O THE NEAREST TNOUSANpi
ONLY TITLE YEARS APPROVED REOUES7 ��..��
MC GRANT BUDGET, ED FUNDS
FUNDS MC GRANT I MC GRANT NON MC GRANT FUNDS
111 TOTAL
rZt
F I FEDERAL
® STATE LOCAL ((..s/ i • h/MIMI III '6o.
I '661 I •6•r I 'T•
Local Development
Company
0 25 I 35 1 350 0 1 0
385
I
I I
. i
Managerial Tech- f
nical Assistance I
hand Trainin_ 0
0 1 20 I 0
•
0 0 20
I Revolving Loan I
Assistance 0 0
50 0 0 0
50
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I
I
li
li
I I
■
I
, . ,
I
1
GRAND TOTAL
0
�5 105 350 0 0
ICoprrol Projects must be ident,hed by underlining the Protect Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove 455�
review o detailed cop,tol acquisition and construction cost budget lot each
•vent o dyer orders) which must hove and c renewed end t budget to tee h gimlet, supported dro on Lie for possible i HUD
gency's 7ecorder1 .toff• Ar the time of DDorled by specilitotions and drowhngs (and any parroting
with local capitol submission of this budget schedule, it Es necessaryuto have budge ees� con su developed or the Operohng
0 budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be roomed on fits by th•City lot
Y budget estimates developed in occordonte I
1 fly proposed use to contract and consultant services in on activity shall be justified by o norrptive s otemeeni setting forth the service 1
endered under the contract ono the basis lot the cost estimate. Th• statement shall be included os port of the a i
NU2•IO4O le•) o be
01 Previous edititM is obsolete PDrOp Vato work program.
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
•
MODEL CITIES "'""
FOAM •ppgOVEO
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT crT r nUncE• 9VnE•U vo +�-wtl
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM TE GORY
Housing
MUD 'ALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST THOUSAND, 1
USE PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT
ONLY TITLE' YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET NON MC GRANT FUNDS
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT 2t TOTAL
111-• l FUNDS FEDERAL 1--;7,,TE 1 LOCAL (r�rl ; • fj/
Zt )t
U tSt I ,
160, �6bt
'6c� •T
Single-family
Public Housing 0 0 0 •
j 1,SOO 0 0 1,500
� 1
I
Pilot Housing 0 88 0 0l 0
0 0
{
l
1 ,
I
•
II�
� I
IGRAND TOTAL 0 88 yy 1 I
j 0 1,500 0 ( 0 1,500
Capitol Pto1ects must be identified by underlining the Prole° Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove on file for possible HUD
review o detailed copttol acquisition and construction cost budget lot each protect supported by speclhcot,ons and drowings(and any subse-
quent change orders) which must have been rev ewed and approved by the City's Engineer, a qualified engineering consultant or the Operoting
Agency's echlnlcol Staff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hove budget estimates developed in occordonce
with local capitol budgeting practice, on these estimates shall be retained on hie by the City lot possibl e HUD review.
2 my proposed use to contract and consultant services in on activity shall be tustified by a narrative stotement setting forth the service to be
endered under the contract and the oasis for the cost estimate. The stotement sholl be included as port of the appropriate work pro Trom.
t.�
HU'•7040(4-70) Previous edition is obsolete
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
MODEL CITIES
C T r
'ORM •PPmOVEO
•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANO URBAN DEVELOPMENT nUnGEr eGRE•U NO ey .n•;,
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM CATS GOP
!ALL FIGURES .N 7N Relocation
HUD OUSA NOS ROUNDED TO TI.USE PROJECT CURRENT E NEAREST 7NOUSA t,p,
PRIOR
ONLY TITLE' YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT I BUOGEX NON M
FUNDS t MC GRANT !MC GRANT C GRANT FUNDS TOTAL
III ® FUNDS FEDERAL STATE LOCAL (rn/ h/
,41 ®����
Relocation 0 60 0 0 0 0
. 0
• I
i
,
.1U"
111111111 11111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Ill
•
11 IIIIII
GRAND TOTAL 0 60 0 0
Capitol Pro1eU5 must be identified by underlining the Protect Title. Prior to start of
111111111111111111111111,
review o debited capital ocgutsiNon and construction cost budget for each protect construction, the CDA must hove in file for passible HUD
subse-
quent chop a orders) which must hove been rev ewed and approved by the City s Engineer, a by specifications
fied engineering ni and on upon (and any Doctoring
Agency's Techinicol Staff. At the time of submission of this budget schedule,ii necessary qualified budget estimates developed in accordance
vith locol capitol budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on hie by the City for possible HUD review.tract or the Operating
•
2 1ny proposed use to contract and consuttont services in on activity shall be lustilied by o narrative statement setting lorth°the service to be
*tendered under the contract and the basis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included os port of the appropriate wort. program,
HUD.704014.70) Previous edition is obsolete
•
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
I IV'vucL GI T1E5
,
• .0.... •....„,,„
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT n nc`T °uRt•V ,o •�-R t•
GITT
•
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock • I
•
PROGRA
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET M CITE C.URy
Transportation & Communications
HUD MALL FIGURES IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO 7t1 NEAREST
USE PROJECT CURRENT
E E EST 7NOUSA hO,
PRIOR
ONLY TITLE t YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MC MC GRANT MC GRANT
2 C GRANT FUNDS TOTAL
FUNDS F C
(11 r2i �t IeI t EDERAL 1 STATE I LOCAL (Cnl .; ' 61
15i ■60,
'Sb' I .6ci 7
None
•
i
1
1
.
1
I
1
t
GRAND TOTAL
■
ir Coprrof Pro ects must be identliied by underlining the Protect Title. Prior to stort of construction, the CDA must hove on life for possible HUD
review o detailed copitol ocqursitton and construction cost budget for each protect supported by specilicotions and drowrngs(and ony subse-
quent change orders) which mutt hove been rev•ewed and approved by the City's Engineer, a qualified engineering consuitant or the Operating
Agency's Tech nical Sta11. Al the time of submission of this budget schedule, if is necessary to hove budget estimates developed in accordance
with local capitol budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible HUD review.
1>ny proposed use to contract and consultont services in on activity shall be iustilied by o norrati•e statement setting forth the service to be
rendered under the contract and the basis lot the cost estimate. The statement shall be included os port of the appropriate work program.
H1;D•70e014•701 Previous edition is obsolete
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
MODEL CITIES
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND •owM •PPw0,,EO
URBAN DEVELOPMENT CoTr euoce• t+uwE•U No. s)_wii,•
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET
PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROJECT BUDGET PRLittle Rock I
OGR•M C•TEGORr
HUD Environmental Protection &
(ALL F+CURES IN THOUSANDS ROUN Deve
USE PROJECT PRIOR CURRENT DED TO THE q
ONLY TITLE' EAREST THOUSA r;pi
YEARS APPROVED REpuEST
MC GRANT BVOGET, EO FUNDS
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT2 NON MC GRANT FUNDS
Itl ® FUNDS_ FEDERAL TOTAL
l41 ® STATE LOCAL ((.n/ i • bi
East End
Drainage 0 0
175 175 0 I 0
350
i
Street
Improvements 0
0 496 I 0 I 0 •
0 496
Neighborhood
Development
Program 0
0 0 1,593 0
i 0 1,593
•
I
First - Year
•
Drainage 0
526 0 0
0 I 0 0
i
Parks 0
78 0 1 0
I
0 0 0
Family Service
Centers 0
415 0 0
0 0 0
11111 ,•4
Model Cities t
Appearance Patrol 0 20
0 0 0 0 •
0
GRAND TOTAL
canon ed on n:• t ___
ICopirol Prolecrs must be identified by page '
review 0 detailed capitol Y underlining the Prolecr Title, Prior to start of construction,
revie than e D ocquisuion and construction coil budget for each
A orders) which m uchon, the CDA must have on file far possible HUD
utt hone been renewed and o protect rope, a by specifications ei and drawings (and on
gency•s echinicol Stoll, At the time of submission of th r�dgebrs heduilte, it is necrssor to hove
� with loco) capitol Y s Engineer, o quolifipd engineerin Y s�bse-
D budgeting practice, and these estimates shall ' consultonr or +he UDeror,ng
M retained on fil•by the City for possible HUDtreaiew,deve�oped .n accordance
2 `^T proposed use to contract and consultant services in on
endued undo, the convect and the basis lot the cost estimat tivThes$toremeMS hell b
r n nudedas art of the spiting forth the service to be
•
MUD-7040 UJ0) Previous edition is obsolete shell be included as pan of the a
DD op riare work program,
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
•
tog
FORM •ppg0vE0
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT auo.Er pUgE•U No, el-R1211
•
c T r
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET °R°.A.M rA,E"
HUD ALL FjGURE1 N THOUSANDS ROUN J°p pTa1 NEAREST P n tPf t Inn ( I
PROJECT E THOUSAND,
USE PRIOR CURRENT
ONLY TITLEI YEARS
I APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT MCU GRANT MC 2 NON MC GRANT FUNDS •
FUNDS C GRANT TOTAL
(It ■ FUNDS FEDERAL i
t2� ,3 STATE . LOCAL ("1 i • 61
.l; j5! Ga 6b--,
1
Neighborhood
Appearance ' 0 28 0
0 0 0 0
Urban
Beautification 0 3 0 0 0
0 0
/
Teen Center 0 39 0 0 0
0 0
I
1
GRAND TOTAL ~ ----+
0 i 1 . 109 671 1 .768 0 0 2 .439
l Capital Projects must be identified by underlining the Project Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA most hove on file for possible HUD
quint review a deyetailed capitol acquisition and construction cost budget lot each project supported by speciiicotions and drawings(and any subse-
Agency's thong( cal Staff. must fnsubm submission this budget schedule, it isgnecessaryut Ilhove budget estimatesudevelopred the inDopcco dance
with locol capital budgeting practice, and these estimates shall be retained on file by the City for possible HUD review,
2Any proposed use to contract and consultant services ;n on activity shall be justified by a narrative statement setting forth the service to be
rendered under the contract and the basis for the cost estimote. The statement shall be included as part of the appropriate work program.
NUD• 040(440) Previous edition is obsolete
•
l.
U.S. DEPARTMENT F HOUSING `OPsA APOgovEO
0 OUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
NUUCFT HUOE•U NO ./.q 1,.
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET OPMENT CITY
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAMCATEGORr
Citizen Participation
HUD
ALL FIG 1IRES 104 THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO T
USE PROJECT
PRIOR CURRENT I C NEAREST TROUSA n,'Ci
TITLE'
ONLY YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET,
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT 2' NON MC GRANT FUNDS
(t1 ® FUNDS—
I FEDERAL. TOTAL
{el ®� STATE LOCAL (��nli • hl
Citizen
Participation 0 0
67 0 0 0
Ili -
67
•11111•111111
IIIIIIIII
1
111111111111111111111 ,
II •
GRAND TOTAL
0
I�op,rai Projects^iusr be identified by underlining the ProlectOTitle. Prior to start of 0 0 0 67
review o detailed capitol acquisition and construction the cool budget for Poch r
o construction, the of 0 Must have in file for possible s HUD
quenr chopgga ordersi which must hove been r .awed and approved by the C t teEnsupported neer, 0 by specifications ond drawings(and any Prot.
1 Agency s Techinicol Stall. At the time of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to how budget estimates developed to o,cordonce
with loco) capitol budgeting practice, and theta euimoles shall g Cufor pas engineering con sulronr o. the Operonng
be retained on Isle by the City for posslNe HUD review,
2 `^y proposed use to contract and consultont services in on activity shall be endered under the contract and the bosis lot the cost estimate. The statementtshfal abe Included ios statement selling t y g Forth the service to be
NIft•70/0(4.70) Previous edition it obsolete port of the oppropriote work program,
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
MODEL CITIES
�OqM APPgOVfD
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DE VELOPMENi �uDCFr nugEAU NO. a)_q•j•
Cu T V
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET Little Rock
PROGRAM CATEGORY - PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAMCATEGORY
Evaluation & Information
HUD
(ALL FIGURE'S IN THOUSANDS ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST EST THOUSAN'DI
USE t PRIOR CURRENT I REQUESTED FUNDS
ONLY TITLE YEARS APPROVED
MC GRANT BUDGET, NON MC ��^
FUNDS r MC GRANT MC GRANT C GRANT FUNDS TOTAL
—~
FUNDS FEDERAL STATE I LOCAL (17"/ r • hl
'21 31 l•l IS, i6o, ,bb• ,
111
Sc 7.
I
Program Eval-
uation 0 0 9 0 0 2 11
t
Management Info
mation System - 0 10 10 0 0 3
13
Project Evaluation 0 20
S2 0 0 0 52
•
I
I
I
r r i -
GRAND TOTAL 0 30 30 71 0 0 5 76
Capital Protects must be identified by underlining the Protect Title, Prior to slot'of construction, the CDA must hove on file for possible HUD
review o detailed capital acquisition and construction cost budget for each protect supported by specifications and drawings (and any subse-
quent chop,g a orders) which must hove been rev ewed and approved by the City's Engineer, o quol lied engineering consultontr or the Operating
Agency'a I echlnrcol Staff. At the rime of submission of this budget schedule, it is necessary to hone budget est�moret developed to accordance
vith loco) capitol budgeting proctice, and these estimates shall be roomed on life by the City for possible HUD review.
2 1ny proposed use to contract and consultant services in on activity shell be justified by a narrative statement setting forth the service to be
t
endered under the contract and the boats for the cost estimate. The statement shall be Included as port of the appropriate wort, program.
•HUD•70401440; Puvrous edition it obsolete
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
e ' 'ORM •OOROVEO
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT B�cicer t1VRE�U „o et_�,rr
CITY
CITY DEMONSTRATION AGENCY BUDGET
PROGRAM CATEGORY — PROJECT BUDGET
Little Rock i
PROGRAM CA TE GORY
'ALL FtGUR •rt m •.•TTIi l st e t I
HUD PROJECT ES tN THUVSA NOS ROUN t)EO TO Tii
USE PRIOR CURRENT E NEAnES7 THOUS•r:pl
I
ONLY
TITLE YEARS APPROVED REQUESTED FUNDS
MC GRANT BUDGET: NON M
FUNDS MC GRANT MC GRANT= G GRANT FUNDS 7 TOTAL O L
III FEDERAL I STATE
t)1 iel E I LOCAL ((. l i h/ I
ISI (60.
I l6bt I 16.t 1 .T•
Program Admin-
istration 0 191 I 158 0
0 40 198
i
I
'
i
I
I
I
t
10111111 I
i •
I
I • i
I I
I I
I
1
I
GRAND TOTAL 0 1 1 158 0 I
0 40 I 198
ICapitol P,ojects must be identified by underl,ntng the Protect Title. Prior to start of construction, the CDA must hove on hie for possible HUD I
review a detailed copitol acquisition and construction cost budget lot each prottct supported by specilcottons and drawings(and any suose- I
Silent chop a orders) which mvst have been rev ewed and approved by the City's Engineer,o qualified engineering consultant or the Operating
• Agency's Tgechinicol Stoll. Ai the time ol submission of this budget schedule, is is necessary to hove budget estimates developed in accordance I
2-vith local capitol budgeting practice, and these esiueotet shall be retained on lilt by the City for possible HUD review.
I
my proposed use to contract and consultont services in on ociivity shall be justified by o narrative statement setting forth the service to be
_endered under the controct and the bosis for the cost estimate. The statement shall be included as port ol the appropriate work program,
NUO.70g0(440) Previous edition Is obsolete
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK