Loading...
186830 • 1 2 ORDINANCE NO. 18,683 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF 4 THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, CONCERNING WIRELESS 5 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR 6 MODIFICATION OF THE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING PROVISIONS OF 7 ARTICLE XII; PROVIDING FOR EXISTING WCF TO COMPLY WITH SUCH 8 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING PROVISIONS WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE 9 EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 10 11 Whereas, the Board of Directors passed certain standards for landscaping and buffering of 12 wireless communication facilities ( "WCF ") in Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 18,173 (December 20, 13 1999), as may be amended ( "LRO 18,173 ") which were to apply to all future applications for WCF 14 permits, and 15 Whereas, Section 2(c)(6) included a requirement that WCFs in existence on the date of LRO 16 18,173, but not in compliance with the provisions of the ordinance, were required to come into 17 compliance within a two (2) year period of time unless the Board granted a waiver or deferral of the 18 various provisions, and 19 Whereas, the two (2) year grace period has now expired and new and existing WCF shall 20 be landscaped and screened within 30 days of the effective date of this ordinance, or obtain a 21 deferral of the requirements from the Little Rock Planning Commission. 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 23 THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: 24 Section 1: Section 36- 593(c)(6) of Little Rock, Ark. Rev. Code ( "LRC ") (1988) is 25 deleted in its entirety and the following language is substituted as follows: 26 (6) Existing WCF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with this 27 section within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance unless 28 compliance is deferred by the Planning Commission through the TUP process 29 because the WCF is not currently located within 100 feet of any occupiable 30 structure. Provided, however, the WCF shall be landscaped and screened in 31 accordance with this article within ninety (90) days of final inspection for any 32 occupiable structure subsequently constructed within 100 feet of the WCF. 33 • • 2 a. In such cases where the Planning Commission has granted a deferral 3 of the landscape and/or screening requirements of this article, the 4 Planning Commission may modify the deferral or impose the 5 landscape and screening requirements if, in the future, a major 6 change in circumstances occurs. 7 b. For purposes of this section, a "major change in circumstance" 8 means that: 9 (1) the area within 200 feet of the boundaries of the WCF tower 10 site has developed to the point that there is a virtually unobstructed 11 view of the tower site from any adjoining occupiable residential 12 structure or from public property or right of way, and 13 (2) the City has received a complaint from the owner of an 14 occupiable structure located within 200 feet of the tower site that 15 the site has insufficient landscaping or screening in place; and 16 (3) the City has requested that the parties resolve the issue by 17 agreeing to certain screening or landscaping requirements 18 consistent with LRC § 36 -593 which can be granted 19 administratively by the Director of Planning and Development, but 20 no agreement has been reached, or sufficient additional space 21 around the site has been acquired to meet the landscaping, setback 22 and screening requirements of LRC § 36 -593. 23 Section 2. Severability. In the event any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, 24 item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or 25 unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the 26 ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged 27 invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. 28 Section 3. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are 29 inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such [Page 2 of 3] • • 1 inconsistency. 2 Section 4. Emergency. The City appreciates the fact that the federal government has 3 taken steps to encourage the advancement of telecommunications technology, and understands 4 that it is incumbent upon the City to encourage additional carriers to enter into the 5 telecommunications field and to be able to have some certainty about the requirements and 6 conditions for tower permits within the City. Such development is essential to protect the public 7 health, safety and welfare. The City also acknowledges and understands that existing federal and 8 state law allows the City to impose reasonable conditions on the appearance of wireless 9 communication facilities, which may include, among other things, landscaping and screening 10 requirements. An emergency is, therefore, declared to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full 11 force and effect from and after the date of its passage. 12 13 PASSED: MAY 21, 2002 14 15 ATTEST: APPROVED: 16 17` 18 l hX 19 Nataki S. ht, Jim Hey, Mayor 20 Assistant City Clerk 21 22 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: 23 24 25 26 Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney 27 [Page 3 of 3]