Loading...
15554ORDINANCE NO. 15,554 424 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 43., ARTICLE IX OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF RESTRUCTURING THE P.U.D. PROVISIONS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That Chapter 43., Article IX be amended as follows: Subsection a. That Chapter 43., Article IX, Section 9-101(a) be amended to provide for the deletion of the last four (4) sentences of the first paragraph which now read: "Applicants for small -scale development are offered further inducements to use the Planned Unit Development process by reducing the time and cost factors. This process is described further in this article as "short -form P.U.D." The process is deemed necessary to assure control of certain small developments while providing the small -scale developer a means of gaining commitment without undue financial risk. This process will at the same time afford the neighborhood an involvement prior to final commitment. Specifically, the purposes of Article IX are to encourage:" Subsection b. That Chapter 43., Article IX, Section 9- 101.(b)(3)a. be amended to delete item number 4. in its entirety. Subsection c. That Chapter 43., Article IX, Section 9- 101.(c)(3) minimum size be amended to delete the second paragraph which now reads as follows: "The maximum size authorized for filing of short -form Planned Unit Development applications shall be 5.0 acres. There is no minimum size for short -form P.U.D." Subsection d. That Chapter 43., Article IX, Section 9- 101.(e) be deleted in its entirety. b-35 /I- 425 Subsection e. That Chapter 43., Article IX, be amended for purposes of insertion of a new section to be numbered 9 -101.1 and to read as follows: SECTION 9 -101.1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - SHORT -FORM (a) GENERAL PURPOSE: Applicants for small -scale development are offered inducements to use the Planned Unit Development process by reducing the time and cost factors. This process is described further in this article as "short -form P.U.D." The process is deemed necessary to assure control of certain small developments while providing the small -scale developer a means of gaining commitment without undue financial risk. This process will at the same time afford the neighborhood an involvement prior to final commitment. Specifically, the purposes of Article IX are to encourage: 1. Superior development and redevelopment which is more desirable than that which would occur through strict application of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; 2. Provision of more usable and suitably located open space, recreation areas and other common facilities than would otherwise be required under conventional land development regulations; 3. Maximum enhancement and minimal disruption of existing natural features and amenities; 4. Comprehensive and innovative planning and design of diversified yet harmonious developments consistent with the Urban Development Goals and the Municipal Plan; 5. More efficient and economic arrangement of varied land use, buildings, circulation systems, and facilities; 6. Project phasing that will ensure the balance and coordinated development of varied land uses and public facilities and services needed to support them; 7. Better utilization of sites characterized by special features of geographic location, topography, size, or shape; 8. Preparation of more complete and useful 426 information which will enable the Planning Commission and Board of Directors to make more informed decisions on land use; 9. Flexible administration of general performance standards and development guidelines. (b) DISTRICT SUBDIVISION: The district subdivisions for short -form Planned Unit Development shall be the same as those established for long -form P.U.D. except that the Planned Industrial District shall not be utilized. (c) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AND STAGING: The three standards of eligibility which must be met are location, ownership, and size. Projects may be staged at the option of the developer. 1. Eligible properties include those located within the Little Rock City limits and lands outside the corporate limits over which the City exercises zoning jurisdiction as permitted by Arkansas Statutes. 2. Ownership Eligible applicants for preliminary plan review must be the landowners of record, holders of a lease for not less than 50 years, or their authorized agent and beneficiaries of all properties in question. The approved final development plan shall be binding on all subsequent owners of the land until revised or repealed as authorized in this Article. 3. Minimum Size /Maximum Size The maximum size authorized for filing_ of short -form Planned Unit Development applications shall be 5.0 acres. There is no minimum size for short -form P.U.D. 4. Staging While this ordinance encourages submission of comprehensively planned development proposals of entire ownerships, a preliminary development plan need not cover the entire property owned by the applicant. 3 Applicants may choose to submit a phased development program incorporating incremental final development plan /plat for subareas of the entire ownership. Although the entire ownership must be shown, a boundary survey or some type of device showing streets, drainage or other boundary feature must be provided in order to phase development. Where this is done, the applicant shall adhere to the approved development schedule for the phased submission of final development plan /plat. If the applicant cannot adhere to the time period approved, he may submit a written request for extension from the Planning Commission. A maximum of two one -year extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission which, upon demonstration of good cause, shall not unnecessarily withhold approval. Additional extension shall require approval of the Board of Directors. (d) APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE, SHORT -FORM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: This Planned Unit Development application procedure shall consist of three phases. A pre - application conference with the staff of the Office of Comprehensive Planning, a preliminary development plan reviewed by the Planning Commission and Board of Directors and final development plan /plat approved as a whole or in phases by the Planning staff following its review for compatibility with the preliminary plan. The final development plan /plat shall be approved prior to the issuance of any building permits within any portion of the Planned Unit Development. 1. Pre - application Conference Before submitting an application for any Planned Unit Development, the landowner or his authorized agent shall confer with the staff of the Office of Comprehensive Planning in order to become familiar with the Planned Unit Development review process. The staff will inform the applicant of any perceived potential problems that might arise. A further purpose of the pre - application conference is to make sure that the applicant has or will be able to submit the necessary information for filing the application. 427 420 2. Preliminary Development Plan The procedure for filing and the required fees shall be as set forth in Section 9 -101.D and 9- 101.F, except that the graphic support material and development rationale shall be submitted as follows: The developer shall submit a cover letter with the application which outlines the proposal as to structural and legal composition. The outline should include but not be limited to the following: a. Size of tract. b. Net density per acre. C. Number of buildings and units per building. d. Ratio of parking to unit. e. Ratio of building to land in square feet. f. Number of access points desired. g, Perimeter treatment. h. composition of title after development, such as condominium. i. The use mix by structure. j. Natural features to be retained and methods. k. Development schedule with projected completion dates of various elements of the plan. The developer shall submit a legal survey of the tract to he reviewed. The developer shall also provide a general sketch plan indicating typical building siting, access and other significant features of the plan. 5 M (� see ® eee : � ■w � � ®� � ■� � w■i 429 2.a. APPROVAL. If the preliminary development plan is approved by the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for their review. The Board of Directors may grant, deny, defer for requested changes or information, or return the application to the Planning Commission to reconsider special aspects of the preliminary development plan. If. the preliminary development plan is approved, the City Attorney shall prepare a conditional ordinance making the necessary zoning amendments. This ordinance shall not take effect until specified conditions or modifications are met and until the Planning staff appproves a final development plan which does not include substantial changes from the approved preliminary development plan. The zoning change to a tentative Planned Unit Development classifcation does not constitute the recording of a plat or authorize the issuance of a building permit. Both of these actions are contingent on approval of the final development plan /plat. 2.b. MODIFICATION. If the preliminary development plans cone itionally approved, the applicant shall have ninety (90) days from the date of the Planning Commission action granting conditional approval, to submit a revised preliminary development plan. If the Planning staff determines such revisions are in conformance wiht the Planning Commission's specific recommendations, it shall be forwarded to the Board of Directors for public hearing and disposition. If the revisions are determined not to be in conformance with the intent of the conditional approval, the revised preliminary development plan will be resubmitted to the Planning Commission for public hearing. 2.c. DISAPPROVAL. If a preliminary development plan is denied, the applicant may appeal to the Board of Directors, provided a written request is filed within thirty (30) days of the denial for the Planning Commission. The appeal process shall be consistent with the Article IV, Section 4 -101 of the City Code of Ordinances. 3. Final Development Plan 4 30 a. The applicant shall generally have one year from the date of preliminary plan approval to submit the final development plat /plan. In cases where a phased preliminary development plan is approved, an approved submission schedule for incremental final development plat /plat shall be followed. Requests for extensions shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission, which shall not unreasonably withhold approval. A maximum of two one -year extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission. Additional extensions shall require approval by the Board of Directors. Time extensions must be applied for before the time elapses for all preliminary approvals, as well as rezoning shall be considered for revocation pursuant to Subsection G in this Article. b. The final development plan /plat review shall be conducted by the Planning staff and Engineering Department staff. They will review the final development plan /plat to determine that no substantial changes were made to those elements of the plan agreed upon in the preliminary development plan. In addition to the information submitted for preliminary plan /plat approval, the developer will be required to submit more detailed data and graphics as set forth in Subsection F.2 submission requirements. Variance from these requirements shall not be permitted by staff. C. The final development plan /plat shall be deemed to be in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan provided the plan /plat does not: (1) Increase the proposed floor area for nonresidential use by more than 5 percent. (2) Increase total building coverage by more than 5 percent. (3) Increase building height by more than 5 percent. 431 (4) Increase total number of dwelling units by more than 5 percent within a given phase. Fluctuation greater than the above shall be permissible provided overall density is maintained. d. Approval or disapproval of a final development plan /plat by the Planning staff shall occur within 30 days of the filing of the plan. If the plan as submitted contains variations of substance from the previously approved preliminary development plan, the Planning staff may, after meeting with the landowner, refuse to grant final approval and shall so advise the landowner in writing of said refusal, setting forth the reasons such variations are not in the public interest. The landowner may either resubmit the final development plan /plat in conformance with the Preliminary Development Plan or file a written appeal with the Planning Commission within 45 days of the refusal date. In the event such an appeal is filed, the Planning Commission shall schedule a public hearing to consider the application. e. All physical improvements on boundary streets as required by the plan /plat approval shall be accounted for in the manner set forth by Subsection D.3 Standard Form Planned Unit Development. 4. The Planning staff review for final plan /plat applications shall take into consideration all other subsections of Section 9 -101. items G through J, as accomplished in review of long -form Planned Unit Development. (e) APPLICATION FEES: Filing fees for Planned Unit Development applicants shall be those established from time to time by the Board of Directors. (f) CAUSES FOR REVOCATION: (1) Causes for Revocation as Enforcement Action The Planning Commission shall follow the guidelines set forth within Section 9- 101.(h)(1). (2) Procedure For Revocation The Planning Commission shall follow the procedures set forth within Section 9- 101.(h)(2). (g) GENERAL PROVISIONS: The Planning Commission shall consider the provisions of Section 9- 101.(i) and (j) in the course of review of all short -form P.U.D. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect 30 days from its approval and passage. PASSED: September 20, 1988 ATTEST: City Clerk Jane Czech 9 M 432 APPROVED Mayor Lottie ShacY.el ord