Loading...
Z-5683-C Staff AnalysisApril 10, 2008 ITEM NO.: D NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: FILE NO.: Little Rock Montessori School Expansion — Conditional Use Permit 11701 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock Montessori/Kenneth King PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow for expansion of this existing Montessori School by utilizing this R-2 zoned residential structure for additional classrooms and library. PA SITE LOCATION: The property is located on the south side of Pleasant Forest Drive; west of the Pleasant Forest/Woodland Heights/Rodney Parham intersection. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The school was existing at its current location when this area was annexed in 1974. The property is located at the edge of a large office/institutional node. Such uses are located to the south, north and northeast. Single-family homes are located across Rodney Parham to the southeast and directly adjacent to the west. Staff is concerned that the current proposal extends the nonresidential use further into the residential neighborhood. Staff believes the erosion of the residential use area by even this one lot could have a negative effect on other single family properties. Additionally, the school purposes to increase its enrollment from 90 to 130, with a corresponding increase in employees. Staff also has concerns abut the lack of adequate parking and stacking space, which further impacts the neighborhood. All owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300 feet who could be identified and the Pleasant Forest and Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Associations were notified of this request. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The school currently has a small drop-off area and parking lot containing 15 spaces located on the east side of the building. An additional drop-off area with space for 4 vehicles is located along Pleasant Forest Drive. The current enrollment is 90 students with 10 employees, requiring 19 parking spaces. The proposal is to increase enrollment to 130 students and to April 10, 2008 ITEM NO.: D Cant. FILE NO.: Z -5683-C add 4 more employees. Depending on the ages or grades of students, at least 6 and as many as 8 additional parking spaces are required. No additional parking or drop-off areas are proposed. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: Site plan must comply with the City's landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a twenty-two foot (22') wide land use buffer next to the residentially zoned property to the west. Seventy percent (70%) of this area is to remain undisturbed. The property to the west is zoned residential, therefore, a six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the western perimeter of the site. Any new parking must comply with the zoning buffer and the landscape ordinance. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to provide an approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this tree -covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: 1. With the current enrollment, vehicles stack onto Pleasant Forest Drive, a public collector street, diminishing the carrying capacity of the public street and creating a safety hazard. The latest traffic counts show Pleasant Forest Drive to carry 4300 vehicles per day. The service volumes expected on a collector street is 5000 vehicles per day. With the increase in enrollment by approximately 40%, vehicle stacking will increase. Provide a traffic circulation plan showing the projected number of vehicles, lengths of stack, circulation of vehicles out of the public street. 2 April 10, 2008 ITEM NO.: D Cont. FILE NO.: Z -5683-C 6. UTILITY. FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Wastewater: Sewer available to this property. Entergy: No comment received. CenterPoint Energy: No comment received. AT&T (SBC): No comment received. Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. Fire Department: Fire hydrant may be required. Contact Captain Dennis Free at Little Rock Fire Department; Phone #918-3757. County Planning: No Comments. CATA: The site is not located on or near a CATA bus route. Planning_ Division: No Comments. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 7, 2008) The applicant was present. Staff presented the item and noted additional information was needed on the ages of children enrolled at the school and the number of employees. Staff asked the applicant to locate and describe signage and fencing. It was noted that the school proposed to increase enrollment from 90 students to 130. It was also noted that the subdivision's bill of assurance appeared to still be in force and prohibited the proposed use. In response to a question from staff, the applicant stated there would be no outside activities on the added site, other than a walkway from the building to the existing school building. Public Works and Landscape Comments were discussed. Public Works staff expressed concern about vehicle stacking on Pleasant Forest Drive and asked the applicant to provide a traffic circulation plan. The Committee cautioned the applicant about the potential bill of assurance issue. After the advising the applicant to submit responses to staff issues by February 13, 2008, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission - 3 April 10, 2008 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5683-C STAFF ANALYSIS: The Little Rock Montessori School is located on the R-2 zoned, 0.95 acre tract at 3704 Woodland Heights Road. The school was in existence when this area was annexed to the City in 1974. On June 1, 1993, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow for an addition onto the existing building. The addition was proposed to provide a "nap room" for the smaller children and an extra room for after school activities. A 13 -space parking lot was located on the east side of the building. The school had an enrollment of 85 children with 15 employees, requiring 24 parking spaces. No increase in enrollment was proposed. This addition was not constructed and, after three years, the C.U.P. was no longer valid. On July 23, 1998, the Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow for construction of an addition onto the existing building. The addition was to be smaller than that approved in 1993. Again, the use was nap room and after school activity area. No increase in enrollment was proposed. The school worked with the City on a redesign of the Woodland Heights/Rodney Parham/Pleasant Forest intersection, resulting in the current parking lot design on the east side of the building. A portion of the parking lot and driveway was permitted to be in the right-of-way, resulting in 15 parking spaces. That addition was constructed. On September 30, 1999 a conditional use permit was approved to allow for construction of a drop-off area off of Pleasant Forest Drive, on the north side of the school. Again, no increase in enrollment or number of employees was proposed. They remained at 85 and 15 respectively. The School is now requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow two major changes. First, is to expand the school property by taking in the single family residence located adjacent to the school at 11701 Pleasant Forest Drive. The school proposes to remodel the residential structure to convert it into a two classroom facility with library. Second, is to expand the school's enrollment from 90 students to 130 and to expand employee numbers from the current number of 10 to 14 (Note: the school has previously had 15 employees.). The school proposes to expand its curriculum to add grades 1 and 2. The ages of the children currently range from 22 months to 5 years old. The exterior of the house will remain as is with the exception of removing the garage door and installing siding to match the rest of the house. The existing playground area will be improved and a covered walkway will be constructed to connect the existing school building with the structure at 11701 Pleasant Forest Drive. There will be no outdoor activities on the new site. The existing driveway on the residential lot will be utilized for parking of two teachers' vehicles. M April 10, 2008 FILE NO.: Z -5683-C Staff is not supportive of the proposal. Since the school's annexation into the City, there have been three subsequent conditional use permit applications reviewed by the Planning Commission. Two things have remained constant throughout those reviews. The school campus did not expand and the enrollment numbers remained the same. This current proposal expands the school use area by taking in a single-family residence and converting it into classroom and library space. Additionally, the school's enrollment is to increase by 40 students, a 44% increase. The curriculum is to expand with the addition of grades 1 and 2. No changes are proposed to the current parking and drop-off arrangements. Stacking for drop-off and pick-up is to continue on Pleasant Forest Drive during peak hours. Public Works staff has reviewed the traffic circulation plan submitted by the school and cannot support a proposal which results in additional vehicle stacking on Pleasant Forest Drive. The 1979 Bill of Assurance for Pleasant Forest Park Subdivision appears to still be in force and contains the following statement, which is pertinent to the current issue: "No lot which is designated as a single family lot shall be used except for single family residential purposes." The applicant states he is aware of that issue and is pursuing amending the bill of assurance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the C.U.P. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 28, 2008) Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on February 26, 2008 requesting the application be deferred to the April 10, 2008 Agenda. Staff supported the deferral request. With a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent the Commission voted to waive their bylaws and accept the request for deferral being less than five (5) working days prior to the public hearing. The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the April 10, 2008 Agenda. A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent. 5 April 10, 2008 ITEM NO.: D [Cont. FILE NO.: Z -5683-C PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 10, 2008) The applicants were present. There were no objectors present. There were 40+/- registered supporters present. Numerous letters of support and opposition had been distributed to the Commission. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of denial. It was noted that Traffic Engineering had determined there were no traffic concerns. The applicant, Ken King, explained the proposal and stated it would not result in an erosion of the neighborhood. He stated the school was committed to not asking for any further expansion. Linn Siems, administrator of the school, stated she felt the school had a positive influence on the neighborhood. She explained the Montessori program and philosophy. Randolph Polk, of 12 Mont Blac Cove Maumelle, stated he had a child in the school. He discussed the value of a Montessori education. Mr. King asked all those present in support of the school to stand. 40+/- persons stood. Mr. King noted there were no persons present in opposition. Commissioner Adcock asked how many of those present in support actually lived in the neighborhood. Two -three persons stood. In response to a question from Commissioner Nunnley, Mr. King reiterated his promise that the school would never ask to expand beyond the current application area. In response to questions from Commissioners Rector and Pruitt, staff stated the Traffic Engineer had determined the proposed expansion would not have a negative impact of traffic on the street, in part because some of the expanded numbers would involve siblings, not necessarily 40 new vehicles coming to the site. In response to a question from Commissioner Williams, Mr. King stated they were beginning the process of pursuing and amendment to the bill of assurance. In response to questions from Vice -Chair Yates, Mr. King addressed some specifics of the site plan. A motion was made to approve the application, including all staff comments and conditions excluding the recommendation of denial. The motion was approved by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. Al