Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Z-5646-A Application 3
Page 4C-6 December 2000 Guidance: The combination of Conditions A and B should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems. Section 4C.03 Warrant 2 Four -Hour Vehicular Volume Support: The Four -Hour Vehicular Volume signal warrant conditions are intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher -volume minor -street approach (one direction only) all fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 for the existing combination of approach Ianes. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 4 hours. Option: If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th -percentile speed on the major street exceeds 70 km/h (40 mph) or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-2 may be used in place of Figure 4C-1. Section 4C.04 Warrant 3 Peak Hour Support: The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of 1 hour of an average day, the minor -street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. Standard: This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases. Such cases include, but are not limited to, office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high -occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time. Sect. 4C.02 to 4C.04 December 2000 = 500 > = 400 wQ � 300 H� Q Cc W 200 Z J 0 100 2 0 2 Page 4C-7 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume *115 *80 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h (40 mph) ON MAJOR STREET) = 400 f a 2 Q 300 � WO W G= � \ H a U Q 200 OW z� �_j 0 100 — - 2 0 2 nM hAnoC I AAICC 9 ,' nD hdrl Cil- 1 AAIGC 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. *80 *60 1000 Sect. 4C.04 December 2000 600 d 500 2 W Q 400 w0 o= � � a 300 IrQ Lu Z ? 200 � J O > 100 2 0 2 Page 4C-9 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour '150 "100 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) "Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h (40 mph) ON MAJOR STREET) o_ = 400 F - a w � 300 F- (L rn (L Cra Z0 Lu 200 � J > 100 2 0 2 "100 75 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Sect. 4C.05 - ------------------- 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES - 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE I I /1 LANE & 1 LANE "100 75 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Sect. 4C.05 Page 4C-8 December 2000 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following two categories are met: A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15 -minute periods) of an average day: 1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor - street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle -hours for a one -lane approach; or 5 vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach, and 2. The volume on the same minor -street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles pel. hour for two moving lanes, and 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. B. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher -volume minor -street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15 -minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes. Option: If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th -percentile speed on the major street exceeds 70 km/h (40 mph), or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-4 may be used in place of Figure 4C-3 to satisfy the criteria in the second category of the Standard. Section 4C.05 Warrant 4 Pedestrian Volume Support: The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street. Sect. 4C.04 to 4C.05 Page 4C-10 December 2000 Standard: The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met: A. The pedestrian volume crossing the major street at an intersection or midblock location during an average day is 100 or more for each of any 4 hours or 190 or more during any 1 hour; and B. There are fewer than 60 gaps per hour in the traffic stream of adequate length to allow pedestrians to cross during the same period when the pedestrian volume criterion is satisfied. Where there is a divided street having a median of sufficient width for pedestrians to wait, the requirement applies separately to each direction of vehicular traffic. The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 90 in (300 ft), unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. If a traffic control signal is justified by both this signal warrant and a traffic engineering study, the traffic control signal shall be equipped with pedestrian signal heads conforming to requirements set forth in Chapter 4E. Guidance: If a traffic control signal is justified by both this signal warrant and a traffic engineering study: A. If installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated. B. At an intersection, the traffic control signal should be traffic -actuated and should include pedestrian detectors. As a minimum, it should have semiactuated operation, but full -actuated operation with detectors on all approaches might also be appropriate. C. At nonintersection crossings, the traffic control signal should be pedestrian - actuated, parking and other sight obstructions should be prohibited for at least 30 in (100 ft) in advance of and at least 6.1 in (20 ft) beyond the crosswalk, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings. Sect. 4C.05 December 2000 Page 4C-11 Option: The criterion for the pedestrian volume crossing the major roadway may be reduced as much as 50 percent if the average crossing speed of pedestrians is less than 1.2 msec (4 ft/sec). A traffic control signal may not be needed at the study location if adjacent coordinated traffic control signals consistently provide gaps of adequate length for pedestrians to cross the street, even if the rate of gap occurrence is less than one per minute. Section 4C.06 Warrant 5 School Crass—in Support: The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children cross the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at an established school crossing across the major street shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the sante period (see Section 7A.03) and there are a minimum of 20 students during the highest crossing hour. Before a decision is made to install a traffic control signal, consideration shall be given to the implementation of other remedial measures, such as warning signs and flashers, school speed zones, school crossing guards, or a grade -separated crossing. The School Crossing signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 90 in (300 ft), unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Guidance: If a traffic control signal is justified by both this signal warrant and an engineering study: A. If installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated. Sect. 4C.05 to 4C.06 Page 4C-12 December 2000 B. At an intersection, the traffic control signal should be traffic -actuated and should include pedestrian detectors. As a minimum, it should have semiactuated operation, but full -actuated operation with detectors on all approaches might also be appropriate. C. At nonintersection crossings, the traffic control signal should be pedestrian - actuated, parking and other sight obstructions should be prohibited for at least 30 M.000 ft) in advance of and at least 6.1 in (20 ft) beyond the crosswalk, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings. Section 4C.07 Warrant 6 Coordinate 111 nal stem Support: Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not otherwise be needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met: A. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning. B. On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation. Guidance: The Coordinated Signal System signal warrant should not be applied wliere the resultant spacing of traffic control signals would be less than 300 in (1,000 ft). Section 4C.08 Warrant 7 Crash Ex erience Support: The Crash Experience signal warrant conditions are intended for application where the severity and frequency of craslies are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal. Sect. 4C.06 to 4C.08 December 2000 Page 4C-13 Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met: A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and B. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurred within a 12 -month period, each crash involving personal injury or Property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and C. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 (see Section 4C.02), or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major -street and the higher -volume minor -street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major -street and minor -street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. Section 4C.09 Warrant 8 Roadwa Network Support: Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two or more major routes meets one or both of the following criteria: A. The intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at Ieast 1,000 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has 5 -year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday; or B. The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each of any 5 hours of a nonnormal business day (Saturday or Sunday). Sect. 4C.08 to 4C.09 Page 4C-14 December 2000 A major route as used in this signal warrant shall have one or more of the following characteristics: A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow; or B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city; or C. It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transportation study. Sect. 4C.09 Page 1 of 2 Carney, Dana From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:39 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: FW: P736-41 Traffic Signal West Taylor Loop and Hwy10 -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:25 PM To: Hood, Mike; Floriani, Vince; Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: P736-41 Trarfic Signal West Taylor Loop and Hwy10 FYI William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Office: 501-379-1816 Fax: 501-340-4853 Email: bhenry c@i littlerock_orr From: Phillips, Eric [ma ilto: Eric. Phillips@arkansashighways.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:56 PM To: E. J. Peters; wayne.adams@lrsd.org Cc: Henry, Bill; wlowder@mehlburger.com; McConnell, Phil; Clements, Charles; Sebren, Mike D.; Prince, Rickey Subject: RE: P736-41 Traffic Signal West Taylor Loop and Hwy10 Ernie: The Department concurs with your statement below and I would like to add one clarification to the permit process that was not previously discussed with Bill Henry. We now plan to issue a signal permit to the City that specifies equipment that can and can not be installed at this time. Then, later upon request from the City that includes the date when the school will open, we will issue another signal permit that includes the installation of all poles, mast arms and signal heads. If there are questions concerning this matter, please let me know. Eric From: E. J. Peters [mailto:epeters777@traffic-engineers.com7 Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:34 AM To: wayne.adams@Irsd.org Cc: Henry, Bill; Phillips, Eric; wlowder@mehlburger.com Subject: P736-41 Traffic Signal West Taylor Loop and Hwy10 Wayne I have been advised by Bill Henry with the City of Little Rock that he has discussed with Eric Phillips at Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department the sequence for installing the traffic signal at West Taylor Loop and Hwyio. Both have agreed that LRSD can proceed with the construction of all traffic signal work at this intersection, 6/4/2008 Page 2 of 2 consistent with the approved construction plans, EXCEPT the installation of the poles, mast arms and traffic signal displays. Under this agreement this work can be constructed under the construction permit the contractor will secure for roadway construction in the highway right -o€ --way. The Highway Department will then issue the traffic signal permit at a time prior to the new school opening so as to allow the balance of traffic signal equipment to be installed, tested and placed in flash, then full operation, just before the school opening. This will necessitate that the traffic signal subcontractor agree to sequencing his work to conform to this schedule. It may also necessitate that some traffic signal equipment (e.g. poles, mast arms, etc) may have to be stored temporarily at a location acceptable to parties involved. The City Planning Staff will take care of the Planning Commission stipulation related to time frame for construction of the traffic signal. If there are questions concerning this matter, please let me know. E. J. Peters epeters777{a oaffic=engineers.corn PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 5507 Ranch Drive - Suite 205 Little Rock, AR 72223 Voice: 501-868-3999 Ext 101 Fax: 501-868-9710 6/4/2008 cup.doc 2 09/22/05 APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Zoning Case File No. Z - Planning Commission Meeting docketed for 200- , at -1 OCA p.m. Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Planning Commission pursuant to the provisions of Act 186 of 1957, Acts of Arkansas, as amended, and Chapter 36 of Little Rock, Ark. Rev. Code (1988), as amended, requesting a Conditional Use Permit on the following property: Address: N S1N General Location: 90W COWFIL Of 1 QELr L06f CWVST) Legal Description55E� A1!7A' Skh9L1 QAJWV 0l Title to this property is vested in: 2v��`� SJ-� (Name) (Address) 2iu� (Telephone) If an individual other than the title-holder files this application, attachment of a completed affidavit is required authorizing this person to act on behalf of the title-holder. al Subject property is presently zoned:* A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow use of the property for: pc S cth4L L cy- Sa.WMQL'7btrr -1 There (are) (Ce no ) private restrictions pertaining to the proposed use. / w Y aA It is hereby agreed that the required filing fee will be paid immediately and the posting of the sign furnished will be accomplished as required. I r Applicant (owner or authorized agent): Zgl� (Signature and printed name) Address: �� I S • I im4- , Lerna —Ocyk Telephone: SDi . 1''T• d9 31 -*s'L.o I Planning Commissi Approved: J V `� 1 J� , �-y Conditions of Approval: Ci �[ � �"� �`] tfL3 6AZ 70L �� nv AC ( _01"^/-tta Sc — Ar c✓kL'- ' Board of Directors Approved: Ordinance Number: L1Tfl.E KO -'K PLntdiuitioR�yRyI: APPP MED, SIiDJrCT TO THE COr,'DITIONS A5 hs'OT i !N THE ! LA"11-11 " C":ti1�k'1"'S!Oi+i WlgUTE _cCL-;rD .i-0 X07. BY: DATE: '�N)L,L I3$ tPi AM R'r A 1,A76)Z WIC, 7T rH r TIME ECT ENTIRE )PERTY URVEY )T TH T TIME OT TH .T TIME 0 71 a -------------- I. e Properly 17escription Part of the SEIA of the SWI/4 of Section 13, and part of the NEIA of the NW1/4 of Section 24, all in Township 2 North; Range 14 West, Pulaski County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said NE1/4 of the NW1/4; thence along the East line of said NEIA of the NW1/4, South 01°48'54" West 397.39 feet; thence continuing along said East line South 01°47'03" West 293.26 feet; thence continuing along said East line South 01'27'05" West 428.78 feet; thence departing said East line North 88°25'55" West 218.84 feet; thence South 01°25'24" West 210.94 feet to a point on the South line of said NEIA of the NWl/4; thence along said South line North 89°09'56" West 437.30 feet; thence North 01°32'09" East 905.09 feet; thence North 01°22'22" East 400.03 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of State Highway No. 10 (Cantrell Road); thence along said Southerly right of way line North 88°44'32" East 68.68 feet; thence continuing along said Southerly right of way line South 68°06'41" East 38.82 feet; thence continuing along said Southerly right of way line North 6710'13" East 26.74 feet; thence continuing along said Southerly right of way line North 88°50'50" East 246.67 feet; thence continuing along said Southerly right of way line North 86°00' 11" East 199.30 feet; thence continuing along said Southerly right of way line North 87'17'10" East 85.48 feet; thence departing said Southerly right of way line South 0I'l9'01" West 7.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing 18.752 acres more or less. cup.doc 3 09/22/05 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AGREEMENT SW ' LOCATION/ADDRESS: Lp $ -�. LW Loot WAS DATE; 3ofJE 11 07 r,n DOCKETED FOR MEETING ON: %3VLM 19. ZOO I, 11S�S Laws do hereby agree / disagree to dedicate to the public any needed right-of-way as required by the Master Street P a r�lr a public street abutting property owned by me adjacent to the property requested for a conditional use permit. I w ree disagree to provide at my expense an easement deed and/or other documents as necessary conveying such right-af=-way to the public. APPLICANT/OWNER DATE 6A1Z,E—>-7— (If the above signature represents an applicant, attachment of a letter is required authorizing this person to act in behalf of the title-holder.) cup.doc 6 AFFIDAVIT 09/22/05 I, ryTqv- certify by my signature below that I hereby authorize Wit LovYve�t to act as my agent regarding the co -U I? of the below described property. Property described as: G rtp SVi�Y Signature of Titlh Holder k--� Subscribed and swom to me a Notary Public on this � u. k 0 C7 My Commission Expires: C� F k iC-� ; c"L,4't D -C) Date day of Notary P lic 04 June 11, 2,007 The Mehlburger Firm Engineers ❑ Landscape Architects ❑ Surveyors Mr. Dana Carney, Director City of Little Rock Neighborhoods and Planning Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: New West Little Rock School Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Mr. Carney: We herewith submit the documents for a Conditional Use Permit for the new West Little Rock School on Cantrell Road. We are hopeful this submittal will place us on the Planning Commission's July 19, 2007 hearing date. The school is proposed to be developed by the Little Rock School District, and will consist of grades Pre -K through 8. The building will vary from a single level to three stories with a footprint of 200,000 square feet, as shown on the attached site plan. The property consists of 18.75 acres located on the southwest side of the intersection of Cantrell Rd. and West Taylor Loop Rd. Three copies of a survey prepared by The Mehlburger Firm are attached. The property is currently owned by multiple people, and the School District has an option to purchase it. The purchase is conditioned upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Little Rock School District Board approval. A Bill of Assurance does not exist, and the school district does not anticipate preparing one for this property. In accordance with the traffic study also included in this submittal, we anticipate adding a right turn lane for the east bound traffic on Cantrell Rd. A traffic light is called for at the intersection of Cantrell Rd. and West Taylor Loop. We also anticipate expanding West Taylor Loop and Forest Lane to three lane roads with 60' right-of-way. All road improvements will be constructed to city standards with a single sidewalk and be dedicated as publicly owned and maintained roadways. While the school may install gates on some on-site drives, the collector streets would not be gated. We have separated the bus and vehicular traffic and provided long stacking lengths along the drives. Bus and delivery traffic will use West Taylor Loop for ingress and egress. Site distance calculations for the bus entry drive off Taylor Loop are included in this submittal. Vehicular traffic will use Forest Lane for ingress and egress. We've provided buffer strips between the school development and adjacent owners, as indicated on the site plan. Landscaping and irrigation will be installed in accordance with Landscape Ordinance requirements. In the landscape buffer zones, tree canopies are to be maintained. Clearing of the underbrush for the protection of students may be necessary.The school is planned to be designed as a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating Facility. 201 South Izard o P.O. Box 3837 1:1 Little Rock, AR 72203-3837 ci 501/375-5331 ci Fax 375-7452 Mr. Dana Carney, Director City of Little Rock— Neighborhoods and Planning Dept. June 11, 2007 — Page 2 of 2 We are planning on constructing a full size practice football field, but do not anticipate lighting of the field, other than what is needed for security purposes. We will also provide stormwater detention storage as indicated on the site plan. An existing 12" water main is located along the eastern boundary of the property. We plan to connect to that line for domestic, fire protection and irrigation. We will consult with the Fire Marshall to determine requirements for fire department access, circulation, number of fire hydrants, and their locations. We anticipate having to extend an off-site sanitary sewer line from an existing manhole that is approximately 200 LF west of the site to serve the school. We intend to conduct a public meeting for the neighbors. We will contact the City to further arrange this meeting. We will notify the owners within 200' of the subject property of both, the neighborhood meeting, as well as the Planning Commission Hearing. Representatives of the school district and design team will attend the neighborhood meeting, and we are hopeful that representatives of the City of Little Rock can attend as well. Both, the school district and design team are looking forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions or comments please let me know at your earliest convenience. Sincerely; THE MEHLBURGER FIRM, PLLC Rachel Taylor, I July 3, 2007 The Mehlburger Firm Engineers ❑ Landscape Architects ❑ Surveyors Mr. Dana Carney, Director City of Little Rock Neighborhoods and Planning Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Site Plan Revisions and Clarifications New West Little Rock School Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Mr. Carney: Per the subdivision meeting on June 28, 2007, the design team for the Little Rock School District is submitting four copies of the revised site plan for the proposed new West Little Rock School on Cantrell Road. As requested, the site plan now includes approximate locations of drives and driveways off the surrounding streets. The service drive located at the north of the school footprint has been manipulated to allow truck turning movements as well as a dumpster pad with enclosure. In addition to revising the site plan, the planning staff had twelve comments that are addressed below. Planning Staff Comments: 1. There is no Bill ofAssurancefor this acreage tract. Correct. 2. Provide information on building design; including building height, materials, roofpitch and materials. The LRSD has expressed interest in sustainability issues, but has not made the determination to go LEED at this point. WD&D designs to meet or surpass all applicable building codes and construction standards. Proposed structure is to consist of one and two story areas with some high volume spaces. It will be built within the requirements of the 2006 international building code. Building materials and roof designs have not been determined at this point, but will adhere to common industry standards for aesthetics and construction. 3. Provide phasing plan. The project may or may not be completed in phases. This will be determine by the school board at a later date. The revised site plan shows options for phasing lines should the board decide to proceed with the project in phases. If phased, rooms such as the cafeteria, offices, and gymnasiums would have to be built in the first phase. These items would consist of the core of the building and potentially be located in the southeastern portion of the footprint. 201 South Izard 11 P.O. Box 3837 El Little Rock, AR 72203-3837 Ei 501/375-5331 El Fax 375-7452 Mr. Dana Carney, Director City of Little Rock — Neighborhoods and Planning Dept. July 3, 2007 — Page 2 of 3 4. Provide number of classrooms by grade. Approximate numbers of classrooms by grade derived from state standards: Pre -Kindergarten 6 Kindergarten 6 Elementary 25 Middle School 12 In addition there will be class rooms for art, music, science labs, multi-purpose, reading, project labs, etc, resource, S. Provide number of employees. Depending on the size of school the school board approves, there would be approximately 110 employees, including teachers, teachers aides, office staff, custodians, and cafeteria staff. 6. Locate and describe all signage. Signs would be erected at the drive entrances. The signs will be of a similar material to the building material and have a low profile to not interfere with lines of sight for entering/exiting traffic. 7. Locate and describe all fencing. There is an existing fence for Montagne Subdivision that runs north approximately 800 LF on the western edge of the property commencing at the R -O -W of Forest Lane. The school district would construct an approximately 400 LF opaque fence, at least 6 feet high, to run north the remaining 400,LF from Montagne Subdivision to the R -O -W on Cantrell Road. 8. Locate and describe all site lighting. The site will have sufficient lighting around the building for protection of the children. The parking lots will have pole lighting. The design will not exceed 1 ft -candle at the property lines with minimal up Iighting. 9. Locate dumpster and required screening. Refer to site plan for preliminary proposed dumpster location. 10. Describe location of mechanical equipment and measures to screen from adjacent residential. The Mechanical system has not been designed. AN mechanical equipment will be screened from adjacent residential. Mechanical equipment on roof will be screened by adjacent building mass, screen wall, or combination thereof. Mechanical equipment on the ground will be screened by building structure, screen wall, vegetation, or combination thereof Mr. Dana Camey, Director City of Little Rock — Neighborhoods and Planning Dept. July 3, 2007 — Page 3 of 3 11. Will there be outside speakers, bells or intercom? There will be outside speakers particularly in the areas of the playfieId and the student drop off/pick up zones. 12. Will there be any formal use of the `practice football field"? Locate grandstands, restrooms concessions, etc. There will be no formal use of the practice field. In addition to addressing the planning staff comments, the school district would like to amend the request for "cleaning of underbrush in buffers". The school district would salvage all trees with trunk diameters of 3" or greater and would clear underbrush that does not meet this size requi Previously, this request is due to concern for the safety of students. rement. un mentioned Both, the school district and design team are looking forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions or comments please let me know at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, THE MEHLBURGER FIRM, PLLC Rachel Taylor, 1� y r, EI PN—Etrs\2005 1s7 1— SITE STUDA—GR ioov sr[\siie wog Rea.. a.S, 71312— 127-11 vu. RII 1, , A-LIZ._�� A l 0 1- 5e ___ certify by my signature below that I hereby authorize —G] -5 � .� _ w , .� , ,_�5.-� ;,�,. to act as my agent regarding the of the below described property. Property described tis: :? r ( � t 1,�-J iJ N L. .. G' .� 1 � l.K.°, ..✓.J S'1e �qy ����.=�I.�'../ t �� C?�+.,, �� �� map., ��• V r IAI Sfg ature of Title Holder Date Subscribed and sworn to me a Notary Public on this day of �bv% c2yze= �� - Notary Public My Commission Expires: -- 6-,:b6 200 1, �be,e.-T A. VoG CL -3 --,certify by my signature below that 1 hereby authorize Wes Lowder of The Mehlbur er Firm to act as my agent regarding the of the below described property. Property described as: Apgroximately 16.73 acres located at Vilest Taylor Loo Road & Highway 10Little Rock Arkansas. 7 - , ay L O Q T F rU P,4 RTN iERS N r io Signature of Title Holder Da MA-NA6 1IVCr PA A7A) CP— Subscribed and sworn to me a Notary Public on this �k day of _�6 _ ROO Li Ari�'3 +ri ry Public k1VOCOMM ROW My commission expires: ` S7 Q tali P•d RnF.9-qRR fTnRl 00 RITeaJ T020A d;,q:Rn l.n 9T Tnr I, Kenneth J. Bisbee, certify by my signature below that I hereby authorize Wes Lowder of The Mehlbur gr Firm to act as my agent regarding the PCD of the below described property. Property described as: Approximately 1 acre on West Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, Arkansas. Signature of TRW Holder Date Subscribed and sworn to me a Notary Public on this day ,,i, ,<<, QF;:• 4TA,y'% 2 My Comm. Expires 1-11-2012 - k''�.'oUSL��;, My commission expkCC7ut�,..�'' -- 1-11--2012- West Little Rock School Student Population: Phase I: Elementary School — 895 Students (55% riding buses) Phase I1 (Full Build Out): Middle School — 440 Students (60% riding buses) Total. 1335 Students (Students NOT riding buses = 579) Trip Generation Summary: Total Trips Generated (24 hour) : 1868 vpd AM Peak Hour: 715 trips PM peak Hour: 715 trips Existing Traffic Vollumes: Cantrell Rd. (Principal Arterial, 5 -lane) = 25,507 vpd Taylor Loop (Collector, 2 -lane) = 1272 vpd Forest Ln. (Residential, currently less than 18 ft wide) = 394 vpd Major Traffic Requirements (including but not limited to the following): Widen Taylor Loop to 3 lanes (NB+SB + Center turn lane) Eastbound Right -turn Lane on Cantrell Rd Widen Forest Ln. to 3 -lanes for the school frontage and 2 -lanes to the west upto Katillus Install Traffic Signal at Taylor Loop and Cantrell Construct 250 ft. Left -turn bay on Taylor Loop at Forest Ln. for NB traffic Police assistance at Taylor Loop and Forest Lan. During peak hours Interior drives to be designed as recommended in the study Final Geometric Design details to be reviewed and approved by PW staff IVALLEY FALLS Existing Volume 25,507 vpd �- Itl 5% 30% CANTRELL School Site Students:1335 Trips Generated: AM=715 PM=715 Existing Volume 1,272 vpd a c c 6 LUCKY Y WILLOW FORESI FOREST 2°/ Existing Voluire ° 394 vpd THOMAS PARK w West Little Rock School Student Population: Phase I: Elementary School — 895 Students (55% riding buses) Phase II (Full Build Out): Middle School — 440 Students (60% riding buses) Total: 1335 Students (Students NOT r0h g buses = 579) Trip Generation Summary: Total Trips Generated (24 hour) : 1868 vpd AM Peak Hour: 715 trips PM peak Hour: 715 trips Existing Traffic Volumes: Cantrell Rd. (Principal Arterial, 5 -lane) = 25,507 vpd Taylor Loop (Collector, 2 -lane) = 1272 vpd Forest Ln. (Residential, currently less than 18 ft wide) = 394 vpd Major Traffic Requirements (including but not limited to the following): Widen Taylor Loop to 3 lanes (NB+SB + Center turn lane) Eastbound Right -turn Lane on Cantrell Rd Widen Forest Ln. to 3 -lanes for the school frontage and 2 -lanes to the west upto Katillus Install Traffic Signal at Taylor Loop and Cantrell Construct 250 ft. Left -turn bay on Taylor Loop at Forest Ln. for NB traffic Police assistance at Taylor Loop and Forest Lan. During peak hours Interior drives to be designed as recommended in the study Final Geometric Design details to be reviewed and approved by PW staff City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 ❑ ENTERGY (2) ❑ CenterPoint Energy ❑ AT `& T (2) ❑ Central Arkansas Water ❑ Little Rock Wastewater ❑ Pulaski County Planning 0.. Little Rock Fire Department ❑ Public Works: Engineering, Traffic (2) ❑ Parks and Recreation Department NAME: L_gs l� i✓.l z_- YK 4-tk std'( — TYPE OF ISSUE: FILE NUMBER: LOCATION: Gz'` Jz ❑ Planning and Development — Site Plan Review ❑ Planning and Development Graphics ❑ CATA TO WHO IT MAY CONCERN: '--� -T-", IdIL Z'e w 4 '7"OJ On ! 7f:71he Little Rock Planning Commission will consider the above referenced issue. NOTE: The Interdepartmental Meeting at which this issue will be discussed will be held on Z NOTE: The Subdivision Committee Meeting at which this issue will be discussed will be held on Lzg,c, . A copy of the plan for the referenced issue is enclosed for your consideration, and your comments and/or recommendations will be appreciated. Sincerely Monte Moore Zoning Administrator (Please respond below and return this letter with your comments for our records.) Approved as Submitted. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS BY j0_7 Easement (s) required (See attached plat or description.) *To all utilities: If an easement is requested which is in excess of 10 feet in width, provide justification for the easement or the request will not be included in the Planning Commission agenda. Comments: Public Works Review Comments Planning Commission Board of Adjustment Agenda Date: 7-19-07 Z File Number G-23-387 Spring St. Abandonment -Trinity Episcopal Ch. Spring between 17th. & 17th. No current traffic counts are available in the area. Staff believes there are low traffic volumes in this area. The street today is one way northbound only. 2 Easements are required for all storm water drainage areas. Z File Number Z -3045-A Pevahouse Acessory Dwelling #3 Edgehill 0 No comments Z File Number Z -3879 -C -Def. Chicot Ele. Street Defferl 11100Chicot Rd. phase 1 Per the boundary street ordinance in the Little Rock Code of Ordinances, Chicot Road is required to be improved to the principal arterial standard per the Master Street Plan. The applicant is requesting a deferral of half street improvements for the entire frontage of the property for 5 yrs, until the next of construction, or until development of adjacent property whichever occurs first. Besides improving the street, streetlights will be required to be installed if not already existing at time of construction. Z File Number Z -5646-A LR School District West LR School 16925 Taylor Loop Rd. 1 Eastbound right -turn lane on Hwy 10 needs to be 250 ft. long with 100 ft. taper 2 Location of northern bus entrance does not meet driveway spacing requirement. The drive must be located at a distance of 250 ft. minimum from an intersecting street i.e. Hwy. 10. 3 Driveways on Taylor Loop must have adequate Intersection Sight Distance as required by latest edition of Green Book. Contact Nat Banihatti in Traffic Engineering at 379-1818 for additional information. Note that Stopping Sight Distance is different from Intersection Sight Distance. 4 The intersection of Taylor Loop and Forest Lane will be STOP controlled on minor approaches. This will require police assistance during school peak -hours so that traffic can exit Forest Lane safely. 5 Since school traffic tends to have very short peak periods with very high traffic volumes, the northbound left -tum bay on Taylor loop at Forest Lane must be able to store at least ten cars. This will require 250 ft. left -turn bay. If comment is not feasible, a properly designed standard roundabout may be considered as an option. 6 All driveway/intersection designs must be checked using Turning Vehicle templates or software such as AutoTrack to ensure school buses and service trucks can make the runs. Monday, June 25, 2007 Page 1 of 3 7 Street lighting must be provided on all boundary streets. This will require underground circuit with direct -burial galvanized steel poles as installed by Entergy with differential costs paid by the applicant. Design and submit street light plans for the project. Occupancy permit will not be issued until all street lights are functional. Contact Steve Philpott of Traffic Engineering @ 379-1813 for street light requirements. 8 Design and submit pavement striping plan as per MUTCD requirements for all boundary streets. Striping material shall be thermoplastic or better. 9 It is the responsibility of applicant to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy. 10 and Taylor Loop Rd. Design and submit traffic signal plans to Traffic Engineering Division for approval. 10 All striping within the school zone must conform to MUTCD standards. 11 Redesign service drive area. The current layout does not provide sufficient area for truck access. All maneuvering for access to the loading dock must be accommodated on-site. 12 All improvements on Cantrell Road requires AHTD approvals. The 54 f1 radius on Cantrell seems excessive. Final intersection design to be established with the roadway design. Layout as shown is only schematic. Final engineering design will be per AASHTO Green Book Standards. back out directly onto Forest Lane. No future vehicles will be allowed to back directly out on13 Currently, vehicles at the church located south of the subject property park in the right-of-way and Forest Lane. The applicant should contact the church pertaining to this matter and show proposed driveways on the southside of Forest Lane and on the north side at the property not owned by the district. It is believed that previously, right -of way has been dedicated to the City on the south side of Forest Lane at the church. 14 Is the school district proposing to improve Forest Lane west of the site? If so, please provide on plan. 15 Taylor Loop Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right- of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 16 Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plans specifies that Forest Lane for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. 17 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Forest Lane and Taylor Loop Road. 18 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop Road. 19 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct street improvement to Cantrell Rd, Taylor Loop Rd and Forest Lane including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development. 20 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 21 Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379- 1805 (Travis Herbner). clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be sub 22 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land m and approved prior to the start of construction, itted 23 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Monday, June 25, 2007 Page 2 of 3 24 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 25 Per Section 29-189(d), groups of trees and individual trees that are not to be removed or are located within required undisturbed buffer areas shall be protected during construction by protective fencing and shall not be used for material storage or for a Z File Number Z -6664-C J.A. Fair High Street Defferal 13420 David O. Dodd Rd. Per the boundary street ordinance in the Little Rock Code of Ordinances, David O. Dodd Road is required to be improved to the minor arterial standard per the Master Street Plan when applying for a building permit. The applicant is requesting a deferral of half street improvements for the entire frontage of the property for 5yrs, until the next phase of construction, or until development of adjacent property whichever occurs first. As of today, sidewalks have already been constructed along David O. Dodd Road. Besides improving the street, streetlights will be required to be installed if not already existing at time of construction. Z File Number Z-8237 Mark's Chapel UMC CUP -classroom add. 5209 Ives Rd. 1 Dunbar St is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. Since the church owns both sides of Dunbar St. the dedication should come from both sides of the street. 2 Ives Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 3 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Ives St & Dunbar St. The dedication should be on the north and south sides of Dunbar Street. 4 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Dunbar St. and the alley. 5 For your information at the time of building permit issuance, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Dunbar St. to the residential street standard including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development. 6 For your information at the time of building permit issuance, storm water detention ordinance applies to this property and the property will be required to provide detention of stormwater. Monday, June 25, 2007 Page 3 of 3 LITTLE ROCK WASTEWATER COMMENTS Project Number Project Name Project Type Comment Made i3-23-387 Spring Street Z -3045-A Pevahome Accesory Dwelling �-5646-A LRSD West Little Rock School 8237 Mark's Chapel UMC 6/22/07 Right of Way No objection. A 15 foot easement Abandonment must be retained for existing sewer main crossing Spring Street. Conditional Use Sewer available to this property. Permit Conditional Use Sewer main extension required with Permit easements. Conditional Use Sewer available to this property, Permit Page 1 of 1 06/27/2007 14:45 FAX 501 210 4980 CAW - ENGINEERING LR PLANNING Fax Transmittal to: j g 1w+i- PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW CQ; r -LR 8idg Permits CENTRAL ARKANSAS WATER Dept; Commerded 28 June 2007 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS ,/ SPRING ST / W 16TH TOW 17TH ABANDON RIW G-23,387 Fax # 371 6863 [a001 From Pages Daniel Tull CAW Cngineering Phone 501-377-1245 Fax 501-210-4980 Central Arkansas Water has 16 -inch and 2 - inch water mains within the above described right-of-way. We have no objection to closure of this street* however, we request that the entire right -of --way be retained as a utility easement. The fire hydrants will become private. There will need to be a fire hydrant ageement executed between the Central Arkansas Water, and a semiannual charge will be assessed. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. LRSD WEST LITTLE ROCK CUP Z -5648 -A All Central Arkansas Water requirements in SCHOOL / SW COR CANTRELL effect at the time of request for water service AND TAYLOR LP must be met A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of connection(s)-will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. PEVAHOME ACCESSORY CUD Z -3045-A No objection. DWELLING / 3 EDGEHILL DR MARKS CHAPEL UMC / 5209 CUP 2-8237 Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger IVES RD and/or additional water meter(s) are required. MEMORANDUM TO: DANA CARNEY, ZONING & SUB -DIVISION MANAGER FROM: CHRISTY MARVEL, PLANS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE BUFFER AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE JULY 19th PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: June 25, 2007 NEW BUSINESS: 3. LRSD New West LR School Z -5646-A Site plan must comply with the cities minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. The Highway 10 overlay district requires a minimum of twenty-five foot of green space around the sites entirety. Berming is encouraged along Highway 10. Landscaping is required per the Highway Overlay District standards in addition to the landscape ordinance requirements per the zoning and landscaping code. Interior Islands are to be evenly distributed on the site. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a twenty-six (26') foot wide land use buffer along the western perimeter of the site next to the residentially zoned property. Seventy percent (70%) of this buffer is to remain completely undisturbed. This includes the clearing or grubbing of any/all underbrush. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the western perimeter of the site. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year -around requirement. An automatic irrigation system to water newly landscaped areas will be required. Prior to the issuance of a building permit a landscape plan must be approved and must obtain the seal of a licensed Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this tree -covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. Page 1 of 2 Carney, Dana From: Hood, Mike Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:10 PM To: Floriani, Vince; Henry, Bill; Hall, Mel; Banihatti, Nat; Charles, Nathan; White, Ricky; Loe, Ronny; Herbner, Travis Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: RE: Planning Commission Review Items for 7-19-07 Agenda The church dedicated a 50' right-of-way years ago. I saw a copy of the dedication back when the Montessori school was proposed. So the right-of-way is there, except it is being used as parking. I think the applicant needs to be talking to the church before the Planning Commission meeting and decide where the curb cut or cuts will go for the church. From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 3:48 PM To: Henry, Bill (BHenry@littlerock.org); Hall, Mel (MHall@littlerock.org); Hood, Mike (Mhood@littlerock.org); Banihatti, Nat (NBanihatti@littlerock.org); Charles, Nathan (ncharies@littlerock.org); White, Ricky (RWhite@littlerock.org); Loe, Ronny (RLoe@littlerock.org); Herbner, Travis (therbner@littlerock.org) Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: Planning Commission Review Items for 7-19-07 Agenda Guys, The new zoning agenda has only 2 items of real interest to Public Works. The items are closing Spring St. between 16th and 17th by Trinity Episcopal Church and School and the West Little Rock School on Taylor Loop Rd. Please see attached plans and pictures. Please provide comments by Friday noon. SIP -SArge Closure The applicant Trinity Episcopal Church and School is requesting to close Spring St. between 16th and 17th Street. The street is already one way northbound for this block only. All other north and south blocks are open for two way traffic. I am sure we want a drainage easement maintained. We have no plans for future use or drawings showing future plans. We only have a request to close the ROW. WLR School _.ayIgr Lapp Rd -Cantrell, Rdj I believe several of us have met with the architect, engineer, and Ernie Peters on this project. They are showing constructing both sides of 36 ft commercial streets on Taylor Loop and Forest Lane for the frontage of the property and property on the corner of Taylor Loop and Forest which they do not have an option to purchase. They do not show curb cuts on the other side of the road from the property. Currently, parking for the church on the south backs out onto Forest Lane. Can the City limit their access and remove parking? Forest Lane today is approximately 15 ft wide west of the school property and not that much wider at the school's property. I have provided a picture taken today of Forest Lane looking east from the pre -K drop off driveway. I would think if I was taking my child to this school I would want to access S. Kattilus Lane by way of Forest Lane after I drop off my kid. I have provided Traffic with a hard copy plan and the only traffic study provided to Public Works. The plan also shows a signal and right turn lane to be constructed on Cantrell Road. Is a single left turn lane sufficient? Is the right turn lane which shows 150 ft stack and 120 ft of taper sufficient? I know sidewalks will be required all around the school with ROW dedications. Dana, Could you please provide us with information on the # of students and # of classes and grades the school will house? Thanks for your help. I will be out of the office on Tuesday, Wednesday and most of the day on Thursday. If you need assistance, please call me at 681-7025. 6/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 Thanks, Vince 6/20/2007 Carney, Dana From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:51 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: RE: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop Yes sir -----Original Message ----- From: Carney, Dana Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:49 AM To: Floriani, Vince Subject: RE: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop can it take this to mean that Public Works can support the application under those conditions? -----Original Message ----- From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:42 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: Banihatti, Nat; Henry, Bill; Hood, Mike; Beck, Steve Subject: RE: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop Dana, Public Works staff has reviewed the revised plan for the proposed West Little Rock School and has the following comments: - If the bus entrance cannot move further south away from Cantrell Road, a variance should be requested for the driveway to be closer than 250 ft as required by code from Cantrell Road since Taylor Loop Road is a collector street per the MSP. - The traffic study prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City for review recommends Forest Lane, west of the site, should be widened to a minimum two-lane roadway section to allow for an eastbound lane and a westbound lane. Today, the width of pavement on Forest Lane west of the site to S. Katillus Road varies in width. The widest portion is 28 ft near the intersection of S. Katillus and the narrowest portion is 15 ft wide further to the east. Staff agrees with the applicant's traffic study that Forest Lane should be widened to at least 20 ft of pavement from the site to S. Katillus Road to provide adequate width for two-way traffic and emergency vehicles. This would require approximately 400 ft of Forest Lane west of the site to be widened a maximum of 5 ft. No curb and gutter will be required to be installed on the south side of Forest Lane but considerations should be taken for drainage. I hope this is the information you were desiring. If not, please let me know. Vince -----Original Message ----- From: Banihatti, Nat Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:32 AM To: Floriani, Vince; Henry, Bill; Hood, Mike; Beck, Steve Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: RE: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop If the cannot move the bus entrance, they need to apply for and obtain a variance. -Nat -----Original Message ----- From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:25 AM 1 To: Henry, Bill; Banihatti, Nat; Hood, Mike; Beck, Steve Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: RE: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop Sorry, This is the correct revised plan. Vince -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:12 AM To: Floriani, Vince Subject: RE: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop Hey Vince: The attached site plan is for the site off of Rahling Road not Taylor Loop. William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: 501-379-1816 Fax: 501-340-4853 -----Original Message ----- From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 9:51 AM To: Hood, Mike; Henry, Bill; Banihatti, Nat; Beck, Steve Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: West Little Rock School at Cantrell and Taylor Loop Guys, Attached are the Public Works comments and their revised plan to address the comments. Dana is desiring a recommendation from Public Works to that Planning can give a recommendation. From the subdivision committee meeting, the District does not plan to improve Forest Lane west of the school's boundary. Today, Forest Lane is 15 ft wide with 13 ft of the street recently widened by Montagne Court. Do we need to meet on this, have a conference call, or does Public Works not support this item because of the substandard conditions of Forest Lane. Are there any other items they failed or inadequately addressed. Dana needs a recommendation today if possible. Thanks, Vince 0 �.v q ky. -;5 D V,. Y - " �,+/s C -L -S -,-) = V b C -A-' ZSR} � 01356 - 25'a yw = � k t 6 " Ge��[���� of �G�'10,� '� �•�! � 1r—� � �; U - �a r,% -OA - -t S + $ vw -! k (4�t� k++�+,r3��-may �� - 1Vm i �if J i �. /� fir° � � � i �l,•' ' z+1� •�� Y�.'+� � � y � . -2-`7:f� �- ) 9 S . ' , S5�P = YI-a t' A-�V-1,'vUV'VI ZSA ZSR C 0,356 rA = �k,b" � 1 a y,r ,► � - j (hrt - 0 'm (7KL-U- � I I - I 't � � I s::,dr -r dL�, -:r Ito t .+ `= t14,� I =qs-:flt NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Ta for Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for development of a new school campus. (Z- 646-A) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for development of a new school campus. (Z-5646 A) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Y name occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant occupant ADDRESS 19 ARMISTEAD RD 1610 BEECHWOOD ST 1616 BEECHWOOD ST 3 ARMISTEAD RD 8 ARMISTEAD RD 4 ARMISTEAD RD 6 ARMISTEAD RD 2 ARMISTEAD RD 4600 CRESTWOOD DR 10 EDGEHILL RD 3 EDGEHILL RD 5 EDGEHILL RD 1 EDGEHILL RD 8 EDGEHILL RD 6 EDGEHILL RD 4 EDGEHILL RD 2 EDGEHILL RD 1 ARMISTEAD RD 16804 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16621 CANTRELL RD 16509 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16410 FOREST LN 16300 CANTRELL RD 16602 CANTRELL RD 16610 CANTRELL RD 16924 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16603 CANTRELL RD 16800 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16714 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16702 WOODALL DR 16710 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16511 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16507 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16505 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16501 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16406 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16403 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16401 TAYLOR LOOP RD 16700 FOREST LN 21 MONTAGNE CT 23 MONTAGNE CT 25 MONTAGNE CT 27 MONTAGNE CT 18 MONTAGNE CT 20 MONTAGNE CT 22 MONTAGNE CT 26 MONTAGNE CT 12 MONTAGNE CT 10 MONTAGNE CT 28 MONTAGNE CT 30 MONTAGNE CT ZIPCITY state LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR ZIP znmub 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A 72207 z -3045-A- 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A 72223 z -5646-A name ADDRESS ZIPCITY state ZIP znmub occupant 32 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 29 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 33 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 35 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -564 6-A occupant 16402 TAYLOR LOOP RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 37 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 31 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 16404 TAYLOR LOOP RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 34 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -564 6-A occupant 2 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 4 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 6 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 1 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 3 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 5 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -564 6-A occupant 7 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 8 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 40 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 44 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 46 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 48 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 43 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 42 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 24 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 38 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 16623 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 15 MONTAGNE CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z -5646-A occupant 5200 RIGHTSELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5120 RIGHTSELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5115 RIGHTSELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 13500 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5221 IVES RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5222 IVES RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5220 IVES RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5209 IVES RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 13640 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 5200 IVES RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 occupant 13641 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 z-8237 Page 1 of 1 Carney, Dana From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:40 PM To: James, Donna; Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Razorback Pizza FYI -----Original Message ----- From: Gene Pfeifer[mailto:pfeiferiii@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:32 PM To: Bozynski, Tony Subject: Razorback Pizza Dear Tony, I will NOT be entertaining any compromise offer from RPM. I will be out of town but have retained Phil Kaplan to represent me. He will work vigorously in support of your staff recommendation. I have notified Ruth Bell and Mary Dornhoffer and they will also be opposing the application. Thank you for your staff recommendation against relaxing the hours. Best regards Gene PS: I put my letter in the mail to you today in support of the LRSD CUP No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/883 - Release Date: 7/1/2007 12:19 PM 7/2/2007 ' City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: June 13, 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Johnson Ranch Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Tom Hoffmann ADDRESS: 17400 Hoffinan Lane Little Rock AR 72212 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow development of a new school campus (Z-5646-A) GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loon Roads OWNED BY: Little Roel: School District NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. ny Bo skf, i ctor IM M W�/.r/�� City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: June 13. 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Westchester/Heatherbrae Propggy Owners Association ATTENTION: Mike Saar ADDRESS: 14316 Ta for Loop Road Little Rock AR 72223 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow development of a new school campus. Z -5646-A GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District Planning Zoning and Subdivision NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: June 13, 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Pinnacle Valley Neighborhood Associati ATTENTION: Nicholas Alsop ADDRESS: 6 Waterford Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow development of a new school campus (Z -5646-A) GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District Planning Zoning and Subdivision NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Any Ba ski,i I or City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: June 13. 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Tulley Cove Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Ken Harrison ADDRESS: 5504 Tulley Cove Little Rock, AR 72223 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow development of a new school campus. Z -5646-A GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest comer of Cantrell and Taylor Loon Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tiny Ba I nski, D ctor City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: June 13, 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Chevaux Court Property Owners Association ATTENTION: Sandra Palmer ADDRESS: 5511 Chevaux Little Rock AR 72223 REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow development of a new school campus (Z -5646-A)_ GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest coaxer of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell — Little Rods, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222— Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net 2 July, 2007 Tony Bozynski Director of Planning 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: CUP request by LRSD Dear Tony, I will be out of town for the hearing on this matter and would appreciate you making this a part of the Commissioner's packet. Linda and I are very pleased with the overall plan for the school at this location and want to express our support. There are a multitude of more intrusive uses that might have been proposed for this property. We compliment Mr. Vogel and the other owners for making the site available at a price that the LRSD could afford. They could easily have pursued more intensive uses for the property at higher prices and the community owes them a debt of gratitude. We were very pleased to learn that LRSD plans to install the traffic signals for this intersection before construction begins. If there is any thought about NOT doing this, please see my thoughts in support of doing it first, which are an addendum to this letter. We request that the layout of this intersection and the signals themselves be designed to facilitate development of my property across the street. I would like to be kept involved as plans develop. We intend to develop our west pasture separate from our residence property an intend that the street going north from this intersection lie 100% west of the present centerline of TLR(West). We are pleased that there are no curb cuts on Cantrell. We understand that ball fields may be planned along the Cantrell frontage. This suggests fencing, possibly chain link which is not very attractive. We hope that a combination of berms and heavy landscaping will shield the ball fields and fencing, if any, from Cantrell. We were very pleased to learn that the site will accommodate off street stacking space for all the school buses this facility will require and that all auto traffic will enter and leave through the south frontage. We suggested that the retention pond planned at the SW comer of the intersection be designed to allow future enhancement into a beautiful feature. We believe that the PTA and/or private donations might be available in the future to make this an attractive location for signs, landscaping and a water feature. Finally, we urge that the nomenclature "Taylor Loop Road West" or "Taylor Loop West" be used to distinguish this intersection from TLR (East) a much more well-known intersection. I have long advocated this or some other differentiating nomenclature, to no avail. With the school now locating here, being specific becomes essential. We hope the Planning Commission will grant the CUP for this project. Yours truly, ADDENDUM TO LETTER: Timing of Signalization: I urge that the signalization of the CantreU/TLR(West) intersection be done first rather than last. Cantrell has a slight rise in it at the center of school site malting the site distance to and from eastbound traffic very minimal. The increased traffic caused during the construction period is going to increase the likelihood of a very serious accident. There will be a several hundred percent increase in westbound left turning movements into TLR(west), caused by construction traffic, some of which will stack in the left turn lane, and this is going to narrow the window for TLR(West) cars attempting a left turn onto Cantrell. This will cause them to take greater chances and the reduced site distance makes taking chances very dangerous. I URGE THAT THE SIGNALIZATION BE DONE EARLIER RATHER THAN LATER. Keri Ingraham 40 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 501.551.0318 keridingraham hotmail.com July 16, 2007 Via hand delivery City of Little Rock Planning Commission and Department of Planning and Development c/o Little Rock Dept of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street, 1St Floor Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 RE: Proposed K-8 School at the Southwest Corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop West Z -5646-A Dear Chairman Stebbins, Commission Members and Staff: As a homeowner adjacent to the west of the proposed K-8 School at the southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop West intersection, I am most interested in the plans for the school. As my work schedule prohibits me from attending the July 19, 2007 hearing, I am writing to express concerns and suggest solutions regarding the school's current plan and the adverse impact on my home and neighborhood. Please include this letter as a part of the official record for this project. Information received from the planning staff seems to indicate the school will be a single level building, however the site plan prepared by The Mehlburger Firm dated June 11, 2007 and revised July 3, 2007, indicates a footprint of 200,000 square feet as part of a multi-level 250,000 square foot building. This is larger than a Super Center Wal-Mart store which abutting a single family neighborhood validates the need for specific conditions being part of its approval. Conditions incorporated in the Planning Commission's conditions of the Conditional Use Permit must be carefully thought through to mitigate the impacts on my property and other properties within the Montagne Court subdivision. Such conditions should enable the future school and adjacent residents to the west to maintain long-term "good neighbor" relationships. My specific concerns and proposed conditions include: Concern Conditions to Resolve Adverse Impact 1. Noise A. Relocate the Parent Drop -Off area route and area to the east side of the school's property. B. The 40' wide buffer shown along the west 13roeprty We all recognize the importance education plays in our community and the related need for additional school facilities. With proper planning today and appropriate conditions attached to the school's approval, including those stated above, the school could proceed with minimal impact on my home and my neighborhood. Please include this letter as a part of the official record for this project If there are questions, or if I might provide additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Keri Ingraham CC: Dana Carney, Planner Little Rock Department of Planning and Development via email John Hill via email jphiliahill(c�r�,sbcglobal.net Philip E. Kaplan via email pkaplan@kbmlaw.net line should be at least doubled in depth and planned with dense vegetation at least as high as the tallest part of the building including any roof top equipment. It is essential that the buffer consist of trees that retain their leaves durin the months the school is in operation. 2. Light and Glare See Conditions 1. A and 1. B above. Require all lighting be located and directed and/or shielded to not shine beyond the eastern edge of the buffer along the western property line. 3. Drainage/Ground Water Require ground water studies be included as part of site (The area west of the work plan submittals and that site work permits contain school property has a appropriate conditions based on the findings of the history of ground water ground water study to insure the water table will not being encountered during rise on properties to the west either during construction site work resulting in or after construction completion. one or more lawsuits.) 4. Security A. Require that there be no access (pedestrian and/or (Pedestrian connections vehicular) through the buffer along the west property between the school and line. private properties to the B. Require the school to take any measures necessary west are not shown.) to prevent the recurrence of "shortcuts" taken through private property and/or the buffer, and if they do occur, repair any damage to the adjacent private property and/or buffer resulting from "shortcuts" being taken. We all recognize the importance education plays in our community and the related need for additional school facilities. With proper planning today and appropriate conditions attached to the school's approval, including those stated above, the school could proceed with minimal impact on my home and my neighborhood. Please include this letter as a part of the official record for this project If there are questions, or if I might provide additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Keri Ingraham CC: Dana Carney, Planner Little Rock Department of Planning and Development via email John Hill via email jphiliahill(c�r�,sbcglobal.net Philip E. Kaplan via email pkaplan@kbmlaw.net PHILIP E. KAPLAN .JOANN C. MAXEY REGINA HARALSON OF COUNSEL: SILAS H. BREWER July 11, 2007 KAPLAN, BREWER, MAXEY & HARALSON, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 415 MAIN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 TEL (501) 372-0400 FAX (501) 376-3612 SENDER'S DIRECT DIAL (501) 801-1981 SENDER'S E-MAIL pkaplan@kbmlaw.nat Mr. Tony Bozinski tbozynski@Imlereck.org Director Planning Commission Re: Proposed Zoning of Corner of Taylor Loop and Cantrell Roads for Little Rock School District Dear Tony: I would appreciate your forwarding this letter to the members of the Planning Commission for their meeting on July 19, 2007 concerning this zoning matter. I am a resident of Montagne Court, a small neighborhood of patio homes which is on the immediate western boundary of the property LRSD is considering for its new K-8 school. The neighborhood residents are mostly older folks (like me), many of whom are retired. The general consensus of the neighborhood is to favor the new school, but we do have several concerns about the current plans. A major concern is the rather abbreviated buffer zone contemplated at 40 feet. A 40 -foot zone along the entire western boundary, virtually all of which borders our property, would not protect many of the trees that currently exist on the property and would not adequately shield and protect our subdivision. These old-growth trees make an ideal natural and green buffer between the neighborhood and what will be the hustle and bustle of the campus during the school term. They also serve all of the other purposes which buffers are designed to serve. Having a buffer of only 40 feet will almost guarantee that many of these old-growth trees, if not most, will be sacrificed to the construction. A buffer zone of 100 feet will protect the neighborhood as well as the trees. Our second concern is the circulation pattern of traffic on campus. The current plans show a long driveway alongside the western side of the property close to our property, which we understand would carry several hundred cars in the mornings and afternoons. It would seem that a more appropriate access to the campus would be located away from this western boundary. Our third concern is the possibility that some of the school buildings will be erected with a second story. We would object only if those buildings were located on the western side of the property and if a buffer less than 100 feet were authorized. We understand that there is no guarantee that the school will be built, but we do believe that it is in the best interests of the overall community that such a school be built, and thus we would appreciate the Planning Commission taking into consideration our desire to be good neighbors. We would urge the Commission to consider carefully these suggestions and adopt them as a condition of their approval. 1 hope to be at the Planning Commission meeting, but if I am not able to be there I know that several people from our neighborhood will be, and will be prepared to speak. Sincerely, Philip E. Kaplan PEK:nm cc: johiliahill@sbcglobal.net dcarney@ Iittlercck.org The Mehlbur er Firm, PLLC. 201 South Izard Street (72201) g P.O. Box 3837 (72203) Civil Engineers + Environmental Engineers Little Rock, Arkansas Surveyors Phone: (501) 375-5331 Fax: (501) 375-7452 Letter of Transmittal TO: Dana Carney DATE: 07-11-07 1 JOB NO: 306-162 City of Little Rock Re: Certified Letter Receipts WE ARE SENDING YOU via: X Hand Delivery Courier Service U.S. Mail Overnight Delivery Client Pickup the following items: Plans Specifications CD/Disk Shop Drawings I Cost Estimate Samples Proposal Contract I I Change Order X I Other Co ies Date No. Description 1 Signed Certified Letter Receipts THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit Copies for approval X For your use Approved as noted Submit Copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return Corrected prints For review and comment (Other) FORBIDS DUE 1,20 1 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Dana, Here's the one's that have made it back to our offices. They all got sent out on June 20, 2007. I will get you a copy of the others as the come into the office. COPY TO: SIGNED: Rachel Taylor, E.I. Y. O � A W ❑ ❑ EU. c CD m m m C) C (O m @N �[ CL a `D v m a m w CD ❑ Ck❑ O O �o El CD M a m =r a CD CD 3 CL CD =7 � m M C' Lo N ID _ O n° w N m CD a �a=0 3 N�-m CCD Q M 5 CL CD CD w �w o W CD RCD a CD Sql-v CUD,� W o a In ° am 7 O CD O N G S y. O 3 0 m iR 0 w m a3 a � m m mN CD O CD O PO x D m Vi m CD < CD cy 6 7 � r n l (❑ m o D CL on CD IDCD N m 1 Ef n 3 0 3 n �0 3 Sr < A O 3 O CD m �e - Mm N (D o ° ° w CD ::g CL CD n m y w CD O O =0,. a' w� 3 O 0 N v w m a0 a W 0 N CD W N'o ao CL D o CD o CD < ::r T. o 3 ° m m o F: w m a3 0 a CD CD 0 m CD m K CD 3 ca N o n (D0 5 � 3 3 m w w A D 7 O N a CD�`< C m vim N o°°wpm mw3 53 rt Q- Cl m O Cn ,m.F w (D j C O O- rn CD ° w �w 10, m a� n. CD ° 3 CD W w NoaIn0 CL N O CDO 3 CD O N B O T. m a3 a m m CD (Dp CD r _ cD 37 Q r��r---mm n J M 0 c a3 CL rr;r a m Q ' < m J r' CL ?�__ m Oa O m m o 3 m - m 3 c� • ❑ O i •J 0 E ( El El m 0 o N ° a m m m — a. » (D y O. m CD N CD m r A W oaz ny m m ry C 3 m 0 N y CL a m i M a m CD = ❑ M❑ 0 m T N N m a f 0 m m � N � w a o Do ; -0 n ° o W s o 3 3 CD < A� D O N m N O O O w N m CD w 0 a �a_mnN O U1 0 Q 1 N� 3 a 0CD CD su N N NCD Q N a CD 0 m,3" w N o a o m D m Eo C,o CD 3 C N N O w a3 CD `° =° O � CD m y� cD 4 A W oaz ny m m ry C 3 m 0 N y CL a m i M a m CD = ❑ M❑ 0 m T N N m a f 0 m m � N � w a o Do ; -0 n ° o W s o 3 3 CD < A� D O N m N O O O w N m CD w 0 a �a_mnN O U1 0 Q 1 N� 3 a 0CD CD su N N NCD Q N a CD 0 m,3" w N o a o m D m Eo C,o CD 3 C N N O w a3 CD `° =° O � CD m 0 0 3 N n m (D C 3 30 CD 0 m 1 O D o-. I �ru L - Ln C3 C3 IC3 O I � I O LPI �L-j Lrl D in a z0 CD m Z 3 v CD 2 m O O Er fU Ln M 1-3 E2 O X7 �.J E-' O ..0 0p -.J roo h O O O � � � (D O � N .r N ((DD A W (D E] El t N (D (D f] O C O. a (D (pn -+• D- O. N CD �•..� CL -0 m a m CD = m x ❑ ❑ �7 m C W Q 3 N co C CD n LD = El (D m S d 7 (D D (D a RL C. 0 CLCD 0 ■ 1 ■ O = O O O 7 o 7• sw•<Aa 3 O (D S �fD (D (D CD o n O W .0 N •a5mciID N m W (D -• o Sc c a n 3 w N m w W,_ a m =r CL a- 0 m 0O N� w - o a N m D ,n 2, m O (D O 3 o m m o w a3 •a a m m n N m (D 0 [a X D �N _ _NCD C y CDo 0 0 M m Cn (D ' C CD 7 O - m mo - CL CL < (D mrn '1 N N O CL � N Q d a Cl N 3 m O Q 3 (D - o 9 i 3 J 0 ❑❑ � El El 0 N n a Q p a (D (D � < N (D to (D Im ■ D oDN-V 1*O M.(O CD n Dw < Aa m �;m a 3:ECO: _�,m��� ID 000waCD •O�, O O� CD a co w (D 1 a c a N 3 N m w o mww°-ma rw N w —o a o � D 3 O O CD O 3O(Dmo w�3a3 a m` m FD O N w (D 0 - CD N m O' CD �] D 0 Ir RJ Ln 0 0 0 L✓ O Ln 0 Ln ru IN D d a Z3 n F m Z 0 3 (�D CD 2 CD C3 O 0 0 p•, 3 CD rU 0 M Ln N 0 C 31 � CD O 0C:O O L.r1 bi ru m 0 CD N A ID w m CL 0 CD •J k CD N o_D0 �w00 0 ow X33 a ms g��� CL CD �m vONi O w 0 N N w m El oL �a� m 5 m O Nw m m 1 a o :3 a 00530 -ON (D D) (D 0 N W (D aN a 3.�w C) w - o a m N D a CO S O m O CD 30mNo w c a3 (D co (D o m m 0 m (D Yj a CL o_ (D N CD CL D CL m m N O v 3 (D - 3 •J ❑� � y ~ D n _NCD C y D a CL rt H• � � co a n CD o O CJS � � b N �C C' w O 0 W ❑gyp❑ C If7 CD N CL G 0. m� m � � ■ ■ 0 K M S a CD m m a m m rn (D CDZ mm CL a a m m N N 0 CCD (D m m O o- 3 N - * 3 J X r 0 ` 1 ❑ O ❑ CL CD (D O �N O (D O O w + = 3 � .< AU � =rO — N (D = C —(D o � c,)w0MN �. 3 53 .=;4 a j (D O N o =° �'o c�Cl- C=L � D1 S3 a CD m w m w m w m CL a 3 �w NZ In 0NW D O- N w• o = m o m < Er' Ln. o 3 0 m O w m a3 a m m CD m m W xCD D CDu� 0 n � Z' CD w CD Q ria C Q N 3 W ❑❑4Dr�o D o D D 0 o. O a m � rip M CD N iD O O 3 N_ n CD r_ _ ml m 0 m A W D N CD CL a m (o •0 CD a a m w � CD Z •J k ❑Q❑ n l °i Oda m O j m y a ❑ -C m N � w (1 . cnCD N 0 ID z C 0 3 m CD (D N N m ED 0 0' fru i � I 1 Ln C3 C3 I Q A M I E] E] C3 rt -97m � y C m (rn _ L-� a a m CD Im CD Ln m ru x m � a+fla h -j c-,rl v m 0 O m m n N 7 (1 CD CL CL 'm CD a 0 =•0:CDa 0 n 3 3 3 3 S w O CD C#?* c m fn CD on C7 2Oj m CD d N 0 CD a c :3 a- mCD_WCd a w m aCCLL 0 a m 0 CD w w N oao v; D 56 = m o m < 3: N. o mc�a3 ca CD m CD m co . W CD 0 N co m Aif(f D y a CL CL a � m N S t (D W N O Q 3 m - 3 •J z O n m x D (0(0 V' (D = ((D C CL (� v }` 0 y/ J Q 0 ❑ ❑ O Q (O Q C1 m C n CD CD CD I N 0 � N -n D O w ca z 00 C 3 v I 5R y C (D C N ocr m O O C3 E' Q El ni w L -i n L-7 EDm 0 C3 CD Q L "O -0 O I Ln t -t 03 iru 0 o_ N N n 1 a ■ a CD cwTi � rt < Aa > o > 0 CD J * C S CD Fn' CD CD w 0 0nsrt33 n V) a3 D Af c AO N 0 S •: H C a�mciw a CD C0 Er j Q y x s ¢ m a n n G a (D aCD a m 9 513. N 377WN2w CD CU NQ 3 OO O a N 0 fµ W CD 1 a c tea" N m CD N. N w o o v� CD ID LaW �~ CD O Q S H mnn�WrCL 77 In •� . a r 0 CD m SD oa t J r 1 ` N 7C10 N' CD o mCD r� r n 30co � 4J m _ (D C @ b CD CD n CD CD D W CD 0 N co m Aif(f D y a CL CL a � m N S t (D W N O Q 3 m - 3 •J z O n m x D (0(0 V' (D = ((D C CL (� v }` 0 y/ J Q 0 ❑ ❑ O Q (O Q C1 m C n CD CD CD I N 0 � N -n D O w ca z 00 C 3 v I 5R y C (D C N ocr m O O C3 E' Q El ni w L -i n L-7 EDm 0 C3 CD Q L "O -0 O I Ln t -t 03 iru 0 o_ N N A n o �+ 3 3 Q1 CD cwTi � rt < Aa r L CD J * C S CD Fn' CD CD w 0 N (D o m n V) a3 N o w (p 53 _0 O C 7 Q" N 0 S •: H C a�mciw i o C0 Er j Q y x s ¢ a a wm =cL ww G a (D aCD a m SCD (D N 377WN2w CD CU NQ 3 ao N D_ CL a O m O N m CD N. N w o o v� �F�a'3 . Q S H a CD m r 0 CD m SD A W O Q1 o 0 � D 3 3 ❑❑&0 a f m S CD Fn' CD CD w 0 3 m 02, C 'a m m =n �_ 1 _0 O C 7 Q" N 0 S •: H C N .z ' i O W a CT 50— o (D a a m m a a a �.o Qo vi D \ J O CCD IQ m N �. CD CU NQ 3 VJ a "-art ❑ m w O m r.�m Q S H r - 0 r m = w -" 0 v 3 1 ` N m m _ (D J t. L%� { CD z -Dm O O K to 7 N Q g m CL Cn CD im CD CD A W ❑N Z.m m C a 6' CD CD R a a Q Z m m = T). CD - J x ❑ �❑ n M m 0L� mQ 3 m ID N to (D CD a O ❑ C CD 0 w a Inm O M N M 0- M CD CD 7 m CL a m m -A N o CD -- (D 3 g O (D �( 3 z O m Q (ko mO 0 Q a = m n IDCD m CD > o Do -0� C) o o 0 � D 3 3 >— =r•G A a Q S CD Fn' CD CD r• � `�° N on n�v0r a CDnN _a Er CD CD _0 O C 7 Q" O CD n 00 3~ a 0 N CD 0 w i O W a CT 50— U� (D W W w a 0 n N W p �.o Qo vi D J O CCD IQ 5o Amo N 30my0 CU NQ 3 VJ a (D CD CD ON (D A W ❑N Z.m m C a 6' CD CD R a a Q Z m m = T). CD - J x ❑ �❑ n M m 0L� mQ 3 m ID N to (D CD a O ❑ C CD 0 w a Inm O M N M 0- M CD CD 7 m CL a m m -A N o CD -- (D 3 g O (D �( 3 z O m Q (ko mO 0 Q a = m n IDCD m CD l 0- N i �o O p` ru I � Ln O Edo I In I I I � C3 Ln 0 W D a a W (A a O o - 3 7 lw7 a w o n n W Mi D ' m Cl N C i] c O C1 w w Rtu m DCF a 2ND" w Q O (D 6 3 ID oo ro CD m 0 m m X lD CD N cl) o m 3 m W L c c -y o 3 co m C In m Cr o m o �cl 00 Qr 3 1 ru °fo 3�0 CD o 0 O O T. I f� �C3 11i Ln I cri � .A I ❑❑R� N (D CD N_ C = a m a m m a w ❑ L� ❑ C) m O a 3 N � y 4 a 0 L7 3 61 7 a CD J M ■ ■ D O Drn -0-n o M. (D O m = n s 3 3 cL S O M �p cDEr - N W 7 (D N O O W w C. m �3.3 m ww o rnE; w(D� o Z; CL (OD (D 7 w _� w CD w m !Z CD a 3fwcO ;woao55D S O O CD O 3 O N @0 wa3 CD m CD OSD CD (D 0 3 W c0 c C f0 C a N 0 0 0 0 3 CD n' CD 3J c 3 C 0 0 0 m z a coN 2 N Q I (D I -i 0 O Er ru Ln O O 0 O i k -j L-' i In lLn L rl 0 ru 3 N D m z y (D W- ❑ ❑ m � CD 2 y (D N 0 f7 C 0 (D N N Ni (D G CL Cl D CD � CD (D I Z CD J X 0 0 v Q�x i= 0 3 N N CD 0 p� (D CD N N 7 CL N 0 P3 x D 3 3 3 C N Nw_ Sl to D S '` _ � O CD m a =r CD �w C �. tNn to fD N 00� m(CL Cl.D a CL m am a - a g tp C(D En E; 0- wm� a O O n r (D < C Q N ? a Q) CD UG lD mm CL Q <° 0�QCD 77 03 ��---� (D ',$ _ m O a N N D mm n " a Iv ^~ O ❑❑ wO N 0 PJ C 3 p, F aCD 3 CD (n CD 0 m m CD ❑ ❑ m � CD 2 y (D N 0 f7 C 0 (D N N Ni (D G CL Cl D CD � CD (D I Z CD J X 0 0 v Q�x i= 0 3 N N CD 0 p� (D CD N N 7 CL N 0 P3 x D A C N Nw_ CD to ma > >oc�2 CD m m. 03 = n C �. CD m(CL Cl.D 7 4 G a - a g tp C(D 57 m m a�_� Z (D < _ C1 a a (D N lD cr. - a m ❑ _ m a mm n " a •J ❑❑ 0 tD ❑❑ Z m 0 N O a o a (D ID N 7i < (A N N ■ ■ > o Do j 0 3 3 -u n o 3 (D 3 .w•. K A -O o - m CL m ?� �m -w to (D N O w N (D (D w a a0 CD h'N � 0 m o :w (D - cma- CD (D _ M w SR w m - a 3 CD 7�cn w -'oON .rn> En� a w 3 O CD O O G E; N. O 3 C (D O So m a3 m m CD Np CD A W 0 W X y > >oc�2 mm O C N CD m(CL Cl.D � 4 n 0 g tp C(D a cr (D < _ C1 a a (D N m ❑ - w CD a mm n " a 3 T o ti a D 3 CD (n ❑ D El 11 a> 0 w a N wA (D (D m r m O- 0' 0 3 rU CD n Ul � O m C 3. c3 X o X( O CD E -I I O Ln I � I C7 0 ' N N 0 D CD COCD z 00 c 1 0 3 (A D CD C N C Nr IU C:)CD 0 EDO ir R1 I✓. Ln C3 C3 0 C3 -0 E -I 0 Ln R1 I FD D a a N N a 0 ?f cc33 CD N O (D oo M)cnm . dam CD N m � m O C O a O R1 CL . N o Q ro no - 3 a 3FwN ig ;w w SL R ,L> N 3 C_ NO �o m 3o(DN0 p,F�a3 _ v ((DD. (D O N N O (D D r lJl CD 00 p FOS�••� n � � (fQ E•, Ea. C O N � W � A u7 ❑❑ D � 3 0 tCD o O N n C! C IO N C N CL a m CD C 3 a CL ID d � CD = - z X O � m m O c � W 'P 3 w CDN CD m �. m m 0 7 n CnN i i K Do u v R O N S 3 3 CD a a N 7 NO 0 CD Cl- �a�3'nm O N ((D C IV ID N 3 %%, W n ID 3a COO m m m a 3 R, 40, N'R w -oa of N o a m v 3 F a3 CD m O N W O m p < a m m m CD `D a 17a a m CD < cn ZI (D a m w m a a 3 m NCD O Q 3 O � R Z� o O N N W w N � III I -0 N u7 a m � 73 O 3 0 N CO z 00 i i� it I' A (a CD ❑ El mC) in ED (D . � m m a 'D 'D a C mL CD •J O A m O CD O a 0 Elm N 7 N 7 a CD 3 O_3<?- m a o m r R 3 o w w 3 O r C4 �••� N ��- So'�v.�.m r+ a a7 N .O+•N cn O O. N (D CL - o- (n ow or, CD CD y Q Q (� 01 M CD CL CSD ti o 3'cw N 2 w C7 v - o aNN D N 0 N ,1j a 5o (Do N O O (Do N.o N - .D m d C:3 a3 W r < CD m N W cD N N (D O (D D A (a CD ❑ El mC) in ED (D . � m m a 'D 'D a C mL CD •J O A m O CD O a 0 Elm N 7 N 7 a CD A (a CD M. (CD A C (O � CD m C'- a m 2L -0 a (D w_ m CD m O c m o 3 ti Do w CD g InD � El CD -o 0 N< 7 N a (D a O D 1 i i o D 0- cp 0 3 o w w 3 O W D r A - = O CL N (� r � CD cn _ m m (n � w m y O m n vii Q Q (� O C d N r� n ti p1 =r � CD m CW 70w a�a ,1j N O 0 jJn� 7 N �oaNvD in O O .D E o m o N N r -< .o N W cD 300@0 m@ a3 v < m O a(D m CD A (a CD M. (CD A C (O � CD m C'- a m 2L -0 a (D w_ m CD m O c m o 3 ti Do w CD g InD � El CD -o 0 N< 7 N a (D a O D S s F m o w s 3 3 O 3 yry� ❑ 0 � Da = O �; m ma CL m I h N O N CD o w v w 3 53 " Q O_ (D O N N 1 h - "•� � O O N O6 a N a coo- m � m ro � w Err 3 CL ro" � N 7 mw amw Ii fIQ `-' rD n �D � a Cr m Q-CDaCL m w rD 7 O .� w x. w ;o m o m aN N D ;w o fj N O oN �o m CC 3 N 30m@o O ' CD a 3 ❑ ❑ a m m ❑ z mo ° 0 m m A X Cn n• CL m CD X m m p ❑❑©us � cm c (astt' (D T J a m m w CL = w P � Oc 0 3 7] N y O CD n CLS w 7 N A m m yry� ❑ 0 � (D m ma w -- m a m M. w °'- < m _ - k ❑ m O m a (D m 3 , m � m ro � � N 7 O 2n t0 N m �D � � N � N O w a fA � O m D 7 n S .�. --j 3 yr T -A (D CD n m - N ?C CD m 1 IZ �. a m � m a � � m � b � N 7 a n a m . N 0 ,N. a a C O m o m x N 3 CD CL 3 N ty O ' O ❑ ❑ m ❑ z mo ° a fA a D a m N o NN N 3 0 m o �W a a m m 0 n �rt3 3 CD a CD 3 f [p N 7nr'io N m y CLCD ¢ O N y C a a C CD CD � m a�MCD aCDa no 3',A) w� to uiy Noa m o a Err T.0 = 3 CL a m tL ro 3 I T m 0 N O -01N U) -n> a y m A C CD (U CL <' L2 X m m N N f f 1 > A 0Do-uPn j , 5 3 ° U CD S .w D 3 — O N CL m y m 37 m on°mIDm ID CL CL CD En o Nwa 1 mC�w�w a v m a<a CD N 7� N� W N o a o m D CL N �o mo 3 0 0 N O w m a3 a a m m 0 m SD N U) c1 7 n S .�. --j 3 ro D =r M`< A O O N a ?C CD m m o n o w I _r (D 00 w! m m o.• a n / G O N 0 ,N. a a C O 0 3 �N x O CD CL aCD wCD CD CL m a O Qj N 1 a fA N o N 3 0 m a m m CD v; m O N SD f f 1 > A 0Do-uPn j , 5 3 ° U CD S .w D 3 — O N CL m y m 37 m on°mIDm ID CL CL CD En o Nwa 1 mC�w�w a v m a<a CD N 7� N� W N o a o m D CL N �o mo 3 0 0 N O w m a3 a a m m 0 m SD N U) A C' (D CD Z c 0 3 3 � m Z CD 1 w a L7 O LT' ru Ln L] M M 0 O Ln ru X m ((DCb ID N ❑❑CD CD� Cm a m a w � m ❑L}I E01 O 8 0 3 0 m w CL m CD D CL R- CD (D N N CLCD 0 3 3 n T N I 0 Cl -,1 ' C O Q' ru L.n M M M I� n 0 Ln Y 0' 132 A W SQ ❑ (©(y� CDw CL a ro <' D = w. CD = •J k ❑ .� O � a 3 IDp m - El0 CD ID w a (D r > o Do -u� C) j =r� 3 3 CD 0`< A "O D 3 S .w O �; (D a m �� C m (� (D m O 0 O � w N CD w a y a (D O N o m o W a 1 m 5r 3 C-ON mm w(Dw CD Wm a� a 3'cwEn 2p coo ap w D CL N =r O (D O 3 o m m o w C (D 8-3 mCD m O (D (D CD p • X D I n p < a m� N m w C C ❑❑ CD w o D D a� CL a a CD m p :z a 2m U) N O N CD 0 O ` N N O 0 =L M Q D O w O 3 0 O j n (D - 3 O p i 3 (D S fb O O O R1 y 0 `m. Lol El z m a c =;to o CD a i D w Err 3 0 CD CD w m w CD w CD❑ w a � M 3;0(n - w NoaoyD 4 O rap P y 3<m a • w C S]. •U CD m O N (D O W (D A W SQ ❑ (©(y� CDw CL a ro <' D = w. CD = •J k ❑ .� O � a 3 IDp m - El0 CD ID w a (D r > o Do -u� C) j =r� 3 3 CD 0`< A "O D 3 S .w O �; (D a m �� C m (� (D m O 0 O � w N CD w a y a (D O N o m o W a 1 m 5r 3 C-ON mm w(Dw CD Wm a� a 3'cwEn 2p coo ap w D CL N =r O (D O 3 o m m o w C (D 8-3 mCD m O (D (D CD p m X D - N (n < a m� �, a m w C CD w CL a a CD m `m w N CL m CL z m �JV _ fyJl O m Q � (D - i 3 C7' ❑❑ `m. Lol El z m 0> D O W 0 a CDD � E � M O o � 3 E" _0Rl w 0 i t✓ Ln C C 3 N 0 O 0 CD• 0 X7 M I i LE O ru O ruO tfi u) CD CD CL � a � = m ❑ 1n O a 3 T. l 0 3 w Ca w CD m a a y 2 0 - O - m O � cc.) CD Zr �m o mm'm w �. �aSm�m ww m 1 a SaT.- CD N 7 w w CLI m ° w m a 3 N'oaoND s o- o CD G SO 3 o m O w�@a3 m CD n m m m A w Olsj Dm z- 0M.Cn 'C CD O CD 3 a W5 c -•�. <00ODa v� a m •c CDk�A CD m .0.�i , w SZ7: a'oo o.�m CL pCaai 0 no �3� ons 11 D Cl CID ❑. fl >a CID _; °i m W CD xm m - W P 77 11 =0 ao m ID co O N 0 CD < ?y0 N mN 3 Om o C NCD ul O E . 7=p v O . CD C0 0 m A w Olsj Dm 0C <00ODa a m •c a'oo o.�m aw mN J D Cl k ❑ °i m a P 77 11 CL m m ID ID n N 0 N mN m E . 7=p v O . CD •J ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ If 0 z m D Cn 3 O N (] 1i (D n m j3 O. CL < D 0 N D m Y T a- 1 Z 0 co z 00 C 3 1 CD CD y CO c FM 0 1 O O Er N 0 Ln m C3 W C C3 7 � r CD L 0 L LJ L ib a O C3 Ir 0 O m ru L-A En Ln DO O CD p 0 O � ED 0 CD L -j .l3 LJ O Ln LU Ir 0" i O IN]1 0 9 N O CD N c S > o Da -0 n X33 O J =r� C A- D S O m Cl -m�.�� Dm y 'o n m m (D3 3 [1 Q = m n N o rn0E� CL CDCD=�m0w. ID w CD O- N C2 CD W 3 O Co o aN rn D N 3 0 O CD O 30 m @ O w��a3 � m m CD m m c c c c Z c c c v c c c T 0 3 W 00 D C cn IV O O A m � n rn (D Z C 0 3 3 � N CD 2 CD v m zl Cl I O Q' ru I Ln O I C3 0 O _a Cl Ln LLJ N '- Z) 0 � m m Z c 0 3 3 v m CD R. r � � O 2 :6 x 7G CD C nCD 0 N Er W ftp E-' Ln m 0 �^ C3 o W O a W �❑ CD ❑❑�fn M. 5 CD n CD ro m< to a `D 0 < CD a p N a CD T O D CL ' m = m m D - cr n m 11 O �, El O m O = a CDZ a- ID p 0 _lD3 m Q rD � n w N 0 w � n O_ � N O m O m •'' ❑ CD { m CD 7- w 7 a CO --;-*b=ilio (D o w 5x34 D 7 �-O a 'SD fpm N (D 0 0 0 w y m w a Cl CD ci m (Dro CD a a mCD ng CD m CD !iCDa -, w N- W -• o a N m D NSo a N �0 0 0 m 30m 0 wF-3a3 < 0 m= CD N N n 0 9 S � n ID m Z c 0 3 3 m C) o :M CD o, n ow5a33 ' S �F7 ,< A � D o m a ��� SCD N' 0 0 m w a 0 CD 0- �a'm�a O N p a SU a- � C C- 'o m aC a (D x N c W O a N in D N _ _ 3 CL In O N 0.< 3 N. o 30030 1 w w F:6.3m Er �m m RJ n N CD CD Ln El cl C3 ❑ ❑ CD u� CD D a 0 = a 7 m 0 Z m CD m w C M CD < G L -j roCD CD w a CL N CD '< -- 7 N °- [G 0 m O < = w = m D 2 m Ln Z a m o ❑ �❑ c:-, wq C1 C3 x % 3 c w - ID O m CD.•.7 ID CD w 3 O � N o W m X D ❑❑n2 �❑ N 0 E cCL m< to a `D 0 < m m D D C ' m = m O Q m cr n m CL O m � CDZ a- F m. Q 0 N 0 w � n O_ � N O m 7' a N CD m •'' Z CD m CD 3 O ' •J ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ 0 m ° a Cc 0 O a m CD CD Z N CD CD 9 S � n ID m Z c 0 3 3 m C) o :M CD o, n ow5a33 ' S �F7 ,< A � D o m a ��� SCD N' 0 0 m w a 0 CD 0- �a'm�a O N p a SU a- � C C- 'o m aC a (D x N c W O a N in D N _ _ 3 CL In O N 0.< 3 N. o 30030 1 w w F:6.3m Er �m m RJ n N CD CD Ln El cl C3 ❑ ❑ CD u� CD D a 0 = a 7 m 0 Z m CD m w C M CD < G L -j roCD CD w a CL N CD '< -- 7 N °- [G 0 m O < = w = m D 2 m Ln Z a m o ❑ �❑ c:-, wq C1 C3 x % 3 c w - ID O m CD.•.7 ID CD w 3 O � N A W ❑ ❑❑n2 �❑ N 0 E N ro m m< to a `D 0 < o D D m = m O Q m a� n m w O m � ro � 0 N 0 ❑ m � n O_ � N O m 7' a N CD Z 0 r 0 m o Do _0 M. mC7 0 3 A3 S O N En CD - � rn O n O N m (D M- 53 0. j CCD O N N N D) CD o =01- a w = 0i N N CCD a N a F N N W _.o aN rn D N N =r O = N O CD 3 o m m o D' c CD a3 < m FD (SND CD (D A W ❑❑n2 CD N ro m CD a to a `D 0 < m = •J m X ❑ ❑ a� n m T O Cb 0 3 D ro � 0 o N N ❑ m � n O_ � N O N 7' a N CD 0 r 0 m o Do _0 M. mC7 0 3 A3 S O N En CD - � rn O n O N m (D M- 53 0. j CCD O N N N D) CD o =01- a w = 0i N N CCD a N a F N N W _.o aN rn D N N =r O = N O CD 3 o m m o D' c CD a3 < m FD (SND CD (D b c, --D" �CCDDD C N It Jr=1 ,D CID rA -yrCT) s rA � O CD 0 n o w3 D -p it 3 f y (D CD a `°�,-OMm 7 en CD ? not w w rtf° Cl r a 7 CD Cl (n o v, g C w CD a c=3a- m 3 CL w O N m�m0-m0- X0 y_7 w in o ao N D m S o m O CD < y_ n 3 o m o w 0 3 D <' a FY m m n m m m v 0 (I CD CD CD I I� �C lM �Lr 0 C) C] M E-' C1 Ln UJ [n -0 O:3 3 y CD A w O n m CD o w 3 I �--. (D 3 .w3..< A ~'m r C1 n. ?� C r� CD �oow�m � m m n I a n CD m a ° � CL 1 A O ❑ q Cwt =r a�N n (D m a N w f1a cy CD aC'a CD •J r � ;� a m CA a0 — N Cn ^c a CD m 5r m o m 0 3 U-) �.� 300ig0 F: w m a 3 :D_ N CD CD m J� CD CD N CD n n (D — 0 CD 3 CD SD A w v m X D °D0M.CDC) y N (D g C) .=i 3 3 D + S w A m O�o CL CD m _SCD m O.N m 7 - CI- fy aa CD m a m CD O ❑ q cn a O C 7 dM. n rw f1a `wa w N m a(D a CD •J r � ;� a m CA x ElQ' n P a CD m 2 m n m 0 3 �n a3 a :D_ N CD CD v3 (D — J� CD CD m n (D — 0 CD 3 J ❑ ❑ ❑ C9D� ❑ ❑ CD N Z CD N (O C/1 S v ¢ N M CD 2 � IV o °D0M.CDC) y N (D g C) .=i 3 3 D + S w A m O�o r a CD m _SCD m O.N m 7 - CD �.3 :033 Q CDn.N O ❑ q cn a O C 7 dM. n w a N Er ol mm- f1a `wa w N m a(D a D CA NoaoviD ❑ 0 m 0 ..� CD Er o 30m 0 a3 a m m J� CD CD m A W D ❑ ❑ n c �• � m CD N CL a m L 0 a m w. w CD = w x ❑ �rn n % ID O CD v :3w `D N 31 1p0 n m v" 0 m m n N S w a CD(D S-1""' A 110..1 I r FORM F" OR I'ER SONS W MS I -B Cw 1'Ok. 0D R F' LAXNING COMMISSION Th—W —cai-d—c—an be picked u' p - at any time, in tete Plan—hi g and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Plock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am on ''nsea.. Name Address -5 Date Telephone No. REGISTRATION FORM FORPERSONS NVISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This: cakdl-cAn- be picked up -at a UY time In thi Planning and Development Office, 723 Wiest Markham, Little Rock;,Arkarisas.'_.. r ff I''Wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. To r rno i -aa k" Lj VL6" REGISTRATION FORM ./ F . 0 R PERSONS ' N' VIS'B11 N G TO 0 ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION T'hi's caid-can.be picked up -at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 the agenda': M- C-Aham, Little Rock Arkansas..- * I'wis)a to speak about Item P. on. I-aw opposed for N /0 r7 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 July 20, 2007 Phil Kaplan 415 Main Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the July 19, 2007 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item no. 3, LRSD New West Little Rock School was approved with conditions. This action may be appealed to the City of Little Rock Board of Directors. Appeals to the Board must be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the Commission's action. The appeal consists of a copy of the executed application and a letter expressing the desire to appeal the action addressed to the Mayor and Board of Directors delivered in care of the City Clerk, City Hall, 500 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances -- Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY B ZYN Secretary o Little R k Planning Commission TB:aa 15 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 July 20, 2007 Donald Smith 57 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the July 19, 2007 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item no. 3, LRSD New West Little Rock School was approved with conditions. This action may be appealed to the City of Little Rock Board of Directors. Appeals to the Board must be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the Commission's action. The appeal consists of a copy of the executed application and a letter expressing the desire to appeal the action addressed to the Mayor and Board of Directors delivered in care of the City Clerk, City Hall, 500 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY OZ S Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission TB:aa City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 July 20, 2007 John Hill 32 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the July 19, 2007 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item no. 3, LRSD New West Little Rock School was approved with conditions. This action may be appealed to the City of Little Rock Board of Directors. Appeals to the Board must be filed no later than thirty (3 0) days after the Commission's action. The appeal consists of a copy of the executed application and a letter expressing the desire to appeal the action addressed to the Mayor and Board of Directors delivered in care of the City Clerk, City Hall, 500 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, EONY B ZYN Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission TB:aa WI TENBERG DELONY & DAVIDSON ARCHITECTS T 23 August 2010 Dana Carney Little Rock Zoning & Subdivision 723 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Dr. Don R. Roberts Elementary School Little Rock School District (WD&D Project No. 08-014) Dear Mr. Carney: I am writing to summarize the discussions from our August 16, 2010 meeting with representatives from the Montegna Court POA. Mr. Carney reviewed a revised landscape drawing prepared by Lewis Jordan with Landscape Architecture, Inc. (LAI) that indicated the following additional trees to be located in buffer zone: Eight (8) Willow Oaks, six (6) Red Oaks to mitigate the Blackjack tree that died due to disease as previously noted in the arborist's report that was forwarded to you by email on August 9, 2010. ■ Twelve (12) Loblolly Pine trees to provide additional screening. An additional three (3) Loblolly Pines will be added, at the POA's request, to extend the screening zone to the north. The twelve Loblolly Pines originally planned along Cantrell Road (already on site) will be placed in the buffer zone and new trees will be purchase for Cantrell Road. In addition, the buffer zone is will receive hydro seed in all areas, except that solid sod will be placed at the small piece of property owned by the Lawson family that is on the LRSD side of the fence. As noted in the meeting, it is the district's intent to have this additional work performed at the appropriate time that the specified trees can be located and transplanted, as weather and growing seasons permit, hopefully by the end of this calendar year. LAI has revised the Landscape plan to include the additional items discussed and forwarded four copies to Ms. Marvel, which she confirmed by her August 16, 2010 email. 400 W. CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE 1800 LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-4806 501/376-6681 5011376-0231 FAX We therefore respectfully request that the city release the Certificate of Occupancy. Please call me with any questions or comments. Cordially, WITTENBERG, DELONY & DAVIDSON, INC. F'f! Bradley R. Ch cote, AIA, LEED° AP, CEFPI Principal c: Christy Marvel Wayne Adams - LRSD Steve St. John — LRSD Cinde Drilling — LAI Lewis Jordan - LAI Jack See — WDD Don Smith — Montegna POA Mike Armstrong - Nabholz Montagne Court Property Owners Association 58 Montagne Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 December 26, 2011 Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager City of Little Rock Little Rock School Board Barbara Anderson Principal, Robert's Elementary School Re: Buffer zone plantings at Robert's Elementary School Recently I walked through the buffer zone adjacent to our neighborhood after the replanting of trees, evergreens and holly as the school system had promised following the summer losses. The new plantings are healthy and have certainly been well watered! We maintain an active interest in the buffer zone and the well-being of these plantings and will continue to monitor their growth and survival over the next months and years. Sincerely yours, L � Lawson E. Glover, President Montagne Court Property Owners Association Carney, Dana From: christymarvel@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:57 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Wlr school Dana, Trees are all in at WLR school and they look good if you wanna check with that p0A guy and make sure hes happy with everything we should be able to close the one out.... Actually chilcote jst showed up out here checking too... Looks good. Im going to assume the ones closed unless i hear otrwise Sent from my iPhone 1 Carney, Dana From: Brad Chilcote [bradc@wddarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:09 PM To: Marvel, Christy Cc: Carney, Dana; Steven.St.John@lrsd.org; Cindy White; Roy St. Clair Subject: RE: WLR School LJ- Fwd: 08-014 )BERTS ELEMENTAF Ms. Marvel, As we saw on today's site visit, district's construction manager. the trees have been replaced. See attached email for the Please forward to me and Steve St. John correspondence that this and all other city requirements have been resolved. Thank you Bradley R. Chilcote, AIA CEFPI LEED(r)AP Principal Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc. Architects -----Original Message ----- From: Marvel, Christy [mailto:cmarvel@littlerock.org] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:12 PM To: Brad Chilcote Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: WLR School Brad, Good afternoon. Upon inspection of the West Little Rock school no work had appeared to have commenced. Any idea when/what to expect? Thank you much! Hope to find you doing wonderfully well. Have a great weekend! cMarvel.- Christy Marvel Plans Development Administrator City of Little Rock Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Office (501)371-4864 Fax: (501) 371-6863 Email: cmarvel@littlerock.org 1 Carney, Dana From: Mike Armstrong [Mike.Armstrong@NABHOLZ.COM] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 12:58 PM To: Cindy White Cc: Brad Chilcote; Roy St. Clair Subject: Fwd: 08-014 ROBERTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FW: WLR School Ms. Cindy, See correspondence below. Please call with any questions and/or comments. Thanks, Mike Armstrong Nabholz Construction Services 501.505.5111 (0) 501.505.5211 (F) 501.733.4544 (M) Begin forwarded message: From: Tim Bennefed<landscapeconsultar(cr),sbcglobal.net> Date: December 12, 2011 12:28:25 PM CST To: Mike Armstrong <Mike.An-nstron NABHOLZ.COM> Subject: Re: 08-014 ROBERTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FW: WLR School Mike The warranty trees were replaced on the 17th of October. We replaced another group of trees directly through LRSD on the November 20th. All dead trees have been replaced to date. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Mike Armstrong <Mike.Armstrvng(@NABHOLZ.COM> wrote: See below. I need an update ASAP! Thanks, Mike Armstrong Nabholz Construction Services 501.505.5111 (0) 501.505.5211 (F) 501.733.4544 (M) Begin forwarded message: 12/19/2011 Page 1 of 3 From: Cindy White cCLWhite wddarchitects.com> Date: December 12, 2011 10:43:49 AM CST To: "Mike.Azmstron;7Cc17,NABHOLZ.COM" <Mike.Armstron NABHOLZ.COM> Cc: Brad Chilcote <hradc wddarchitects.com> Subject: FW: 08-014 ROBERTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FW: WLR School Cindy White, CIT I Associate Contract Administrator Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc. Architects -----Original Message ----- From: Cindy White Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 10:20 AM To: 'Mike.Armstron NABHOLZ.COM' Subject: 08-014 ROBERTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FW: WLR School Importance: High Mike, Please update me on the schedule for replanting trees at Roberts Elementary School. Thanks, Cindy White, CIT I Associate Contract Administrator Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc. Architects The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged or contain trade secret or proprietary information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it. 12/19/2011 Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 3 The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged or contain trade secret or proprietary information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it. 12/19/2011 Montagne Court Property Owners Association 58 Montagne Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 September 26, 2011 Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager City of Little Rock Little Rock School Board Barbara Anderson Principal, Robert's Elementary School Re: Buffer zone plantings at Robert's Elementary School The residents of Montagne Court, west of Robert's Elementary School, remain concerned about the buffer zone between the school and our neighborhood. The area adjacent to our fence was overgrown and was cleared during the construction, leaving only a handful of large trees. Plantings were done to replace the lost growth with the understanding they would grow tall enough to visually block our houses from the side of the school, especially the reflective aluminum wall. They would also help to maintain separation of the properties and restore some of the natural growth which buffers sound between the areas. The growth has not been as promised or expected, apparently due to the plantings drying up and dying from lack of water. The stated goal was that the plantings would grow higher than the fence during this first year; few, if any, have done so. On a walkthrough of the open portion of the area on September 15, there were 20 dead or dying plantings out of 37 or so we counted. One or two of the larger trees that were left in place seem to have dry tops, but are still green on lower limbs. There were 2 or 3 'volunteer' trees and bushes next to the fence which should be left in place since they seem to be doing well and are growing higher than the fence. Please advise us of the plans to meet the goals for this area. What will be done and when? If replacements plantings are made, they deserve to be adequately watered to insure some chance of survival. Sincerely yours, Lziwson E. Glover, President Montagne Court Property Owners Association John R. Yates 205 Wellington Woods Loop Little Rock, AR 72211 October 6, 2011 Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivisions City of Little Rock Planning and Development Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Property Adjacent to Baker Elementary School Dear Dana Carney: My daughter attends Baker Elementary School, which is located at 15001 Kanis Road in Little Rock. I am writing to ask if anything can be done by the Planning and Development Department about the property adjacent to the school on the western end of Bakers Lane. While the property appears to be in the unincorporated area of Pulaski County, I believe it is within the three mile extraterritorial planning jurisdiction of the City of Little Rock. The subject property contains parts of at least one abandoned mobile home. Fiberglass insulation and other materials are scattered about the property. In addition to being an eyesore, it would appear to be a public nuisance. Please let me know if there is anything your department can do. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ncerely, J R. Yates City of Little Rock �sn�e L�par en m ❑ s—nn ing 723 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 (501) 371-4790 i FAX COVER SHEET DATE: /`) - /z) TO: COMPANY: FAX NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: FROM: flu LCA-'Lyir DIVISION: FAX NUMBER: (501) 399-3435 PHONE NUMBER: 501 f'- (ep% TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: COMMENTS: Planning Zoning and Subdivision -6 f laCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 November 25, 2008 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING ComMISSION Re: West Little Rock Elementary School Planning Zoning and Subdivision Dear Citizen: ttle Rock When the conditional use permit was approved for Loop Road,st t ins luded the forllowing School to be built at Cantrell and Wes Taylor condition: The turn lane on Cantrell Road and the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road are to be constructed prior to construction beginning on the site. The State Highway and Transportation Department will not allow the signal to be constructed until the school is within weeks of opening. Consequently, the condition imposed by the Planning Commission cannot be complied with. The item has been placed on the Planning Commission's December 18, 2008 Agenda to specifically discuss modifying that condition to comply with the AHTD requirements. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chamber located on the second floor of City Hall at 500 W. Markham Street. The meeting will begin at 4:00 P.M. If you have any questions, please contact me at 371-6817 or dcarne littlerock.or . Sincerely, Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision November 25, 2008 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION Re: West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Citizen: When the conditional use permit was approved for the new West Little Rock Elementary School to be built at Cantrell and West Taylor Loop Road, it included the following condition: The turn lane on Cantrell Road and the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road are to be constructed prior to construction beginning on the site. The State Highway and Transportation Department will not allow the signal to be constructed until the school is within weeks of opening. Consequently, the condition imposed by the Planning Commission cannot be complied with. The item has been placed on the Planning Commission's December 18, 2008 Agenda to specifically discuss modifying that condition to comply with the AHTD requirements. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chamber located on the second floor of City Hall at 500 W. Markham Street. The meeting will begin at 4:00 p.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at' -371-6817 or dcamey6Fr littlerock.org. Sincerely, Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager Carney, Dana From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:51 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Temporary Signal Request for Taylor Loop West at Cantrell FYI and the file. -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:24 PM To: Beck, Steve; Loe, Ronny; Bozynski, Tony; Wes Lowder Cc: Floriani, Vince; Hood, Mike Subject: Temporary Signal Request for Taylor Loop West at Cantrell Page 1 of 1 Ll Attached is AHTD's response for our request to install a temporary signal at Taylor Loop Road at Cantrell per Planning Commission request. We were denied our request. William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Office: 501-379-1816 Fax: 501-340-4853 Email: bhenry@littierock.org 2/20/2009 ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Dan Flowers Director Phone(501)569-2000 Fax(501)569-2400 Mr. William L. Henry, PE Traffic Engineering Manager 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Mr. Henry: P.O. Box 2261 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203-2261 WWW .ARKAN SASHIGH W AYS. COM Reference is made to your February 2, 2009 letter to Eric Phillips requesting approval to operate temporary traffic control signal at the intersection of Highway 10 and Taylor Loop West for material hauling operations associated with the school construction. We have conducted an on-site field investigation to observe traffic on the Taylor Loop West approach to Highway 10. The conclusion from our observations is that a traffic signal is not warranted. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact our Traffic Engineering Section at 569-2232. Yours truly, SCC Charles D. Clements Engineer of Roadway Design c: Director Assistant Chief Engineer — Design District 6 Engineer Roadway Design Carney, Dana From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 11:13 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Emailing: 2009-03-01 Temporary Signal Request for Highway 10 at Taylor Loop Road West.pdf FYI Copies of the e-mail and letter for the CUP file? -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:39 AM To: Eric Phillips Cc: Beck, Steve; Bozynski, Tony; Wes Lowder; Herbner, Travis Subject: Emailing: 2009-03-01 Temporary Signal Request for Highway 10 at Taylor Loop Road West.pdf Eric: 14� 2009-03-01 amporary Signal Re. Attac ed is the requested that we discussed earlier. In the initial stages of the project we have issue a traffic control plan that includes variable message boards on each Highway 10 approach to the school site warning drivers of trucks entering the highway. Channelizing devices will be utilized in close proximity to the intersection warning drivers of the construction area. Advanced signs will be placed warning motorists of trucks entering the highway with 35mph sub -plates mounted below the signs. We hope this will help the situation till a more appropriate handling of traffic can be implemented. Thanks for your help. William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Office: 501-379-1816 Fax: 501-340-4853 Email: bhenry@littlerock.org The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: 2009-03-01 Temporary Signal Request for Highway 10 at Taylor Loop Road West.pdf Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 1 R of Little Rock ment of Works February 2, 2009 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 379-1800 Office 379-1850 Fax Eric Phillips Traffic Engineer Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department P.O. Box 2261 Little Rock, AR 72203 United States of America Dear Mr. Phillips, Traffic En We have been contacted by the Engineer representing the School District concerning the need for a temporary signal during the construction of the school. In the first phase of the project, they will be moving approximately 300,000 yards of material offsite. Moving this amount of material will generate 250 truck loads per day and hauling will last for approximately 2-1/2 months. The route will be westbound on Highway 10, then to Highway 300 and out of the City. Due to the nature of the trips being generated by the applicant and the fact that they will be making a left turn out of Taylor Loop West, we request that a permit be issued for the erection of a temporary signal for this project. If you have any questions concerning this request, please feel free to contact me at 379-1816. Si�ncerreely, William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager M00 S E)bl m ° s PDR Q PCD o lei 4 � s � e PDD o , ® �° s $ o o O o o 7 OMAS PAR ,pD 44 x ® a Mg N ° z LONGLEAM a f C WDD ••• Q ODWL4 o a os W 6 LU do ® 09' P �ResT ' �� 0 PR e � w R2 Lu Q9 z m VA4�{\l- oo �� o m m .p 1 �®® ®'�r-•� G�cl� �� I_ !a PDR 4 i ft VALLEY CREEK o G DEMING Mogul# m Qm�� rx Q v Er Vicinity Map AREA ZONING Case: Z -5646-A N Location: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANTRELL AND TAYLOR LOOP Ward: 5 0 400 800 Feet PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W24 City of Little Rock L�tDepartment of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 November 25, 2008 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION Re: West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Citizen: When the conditional use permit was approved for the new West Little Rock Elementary School to be built at Cantrell and West Taylor Loop Road, it included the following condition: The turn lane on Cantrell Road and the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road are to be constructed prior to construction beginning on the site. The State Highway and Transportation Department will not allow the signal to be constructed until the school is within weeks of opening. Consequently, the condition imposed by the Planning Commission cannot be complied with. The item has been placed on the Planning Commission's December 18, 2008 Agenda to specifically discuss modifying that condition to comply with the AHTD requirements. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chamber located on the second floor of City Hall at 500 W. Markham Street. The meeting will begin at 4:00 p.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at 371-6817 or dcarney@littlerock.org. Sincerely, Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager CAMYiLLL 120AIL__.--_- WOMAN. LANE (P1T.) cove LUCKY IANF. (PV r.) 2-5646-A 40 WEST ELEMENTARY 4o CONDITIONAL USE SCHOOL a, 11 I f lr�l F ea WOMAN. LANE (P1T.) cove LUCKY IANF. (PV r.) 2-5646-A 40 WEST ELEMENTARY 4o CONDITIONAL USE SCHOOL EMP Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell — Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222— Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net December 15, 2008 Mr. Dana Carney Zoning Administrator Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Revised Conditional Use Permit — West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Mr. Carney, During the initial review of this item by the Planning Commission, I expressed my support of the project subject to two items of concern in my July 2nd, 2007 letter (copy attached highlighter added) to your department. 1. Installation of the traffic si nal prior to construction activities on the school site. All parties agreed that early construction of the signal would make this a much safer project during construction and was a major consideration in the earlier approval of this Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. According to current plans over 8,000 fully loaded dump trucks will pull onto Cantrell and return to this project where the posted speed limit is 50 miles per hour. This $25 million dollar project will generate a huge increase in material delivery and labor going to and from over a 1 % -2 year period mostly generating left turns off of Cantrell. 2. Design concerns for the north lei of this intersection. The intersection of Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop Road was to be designed to allow the future northern extension (fourth leg to the intersection) to be constructed entirely in the pasture area west of my home site. We are working with the School Districts Engineer and Public Works to slightly modify the alignment on the south side of Cantrell to allow this. Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell — Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222— Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net 2 July, 2007 Tony Bozynski Director of Planning 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: CUP request by LRSD Dear Tony, I will be out of town for the hearing on this matter and would appreciate you making this a part of the Commissioner's packet. Linda and I are very pleased with the overall plan for the school at this location and want to express our support. There are a multitude of more intrusive uses that might have been proposed for this property. We compliment Mr. Vogel and the other owners for making the site available at a price that the LRSD could afford. They could easily have pursued more intensive uses for the property at higher prices and the community owes them a debt of gratitude. We were very pleased to learn that LRSD plans to install the traffic signals for this intersection before construction begins. If there is any thought about NOT doing this, please see my thoughts in support of doing it first, which are an addendum to this letter. We request that the layout of this intersection and the signals themselves be designed to facilitate development of my property across the street. I would like to be kept involved as plans develop. We intend to develop our west pasture separate from our residence property an intend that the street going north from this intersection lie 100% west of the present centerline of TLR(West). We are pleased that there are no curb cuts on Cantrell. We understand that ball fields may be planned along the Cantrell frontage. This suggests fencing, possibly chain link which is not very attractive. We hope that a combination of berms and heavy landscaping will shield the ball fields and fencing, if any, from Cantrell. We were very pleased to learn that the site will accommodate off street stacking space for all the school buses this facility will require and that all auto traffic will enter and leave through the south frontage. We suggested that the retention pond planned at the SW corner of the intersection be designed to allow future enhancement into a beautiful feature. We believe that the PTA and/or private donations might be available in the future to make this an attractive location for signs, landscaping and a water feature. Finally, we urge that the nomenclature "Taylor Loop Road West" or "Taylor Loop West" be used to distinguish this intersection from TLR (East) a much more well-known intersection. I have long advocated this or some other differentiating nomenclature, to no avail. With the school now locating here, being specific becomes essential. We hope the Planning Commission will grant the CUP for this project. Yours truly, Gene Pfeifer ADDENDUM TO LETTER: Timing of Signalization: I urge that the signaiization of the Cantre]1rI'LR( West) intersection be done first rather than last. Cantrell has a slight rise in it at the center of school site making the site distance to and from eastbound traffic very minimal. The increased tm is caused during the construction period is going to increase the likelihood of a very serious accident. There will he a several hundred percent increase in westbound left turning movements into TLR(west), caused by construction traffic, some of which will stack in the left turn lane, and this is going to narrow the window for TLR(West) cars attempting a left turn onto Cantrell. This will cause them to take greater chances and the reduced site distance makes taking chances very dangerous. I URGE THAT THE SIGNALIZATION BE DONE EARLIER RATHER THAN LATER. Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell — Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222— Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net 2 July, 2007 Tony Bozynski Director of Planning 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: CUP request by LRSD Dear Tony, I will be out of town for the hearing on this matter and would appreciate you making this a part of the Commissioner's packet. Linda and I are very pleased with the overall plan for the school at this location and want to express our support. There are a multitude of more intrusive uses that might have been proposed for this property. We compliment Mr. Vogel and the other owners for making the site available at a price that the LRSD could afford. They could easily have pursued more intensive uses for the property at higher prices and the community owes them a debt of gratitude. We were very pleased to learn that LRSD plans to install the traffic signals for this intersection before construction begins. If there is any thought about NOT doing this, please see my thoughts in support of doing it first, which are an addendum to this letter. We request that the layout of this intersection and the signals themselves be designed to facilitate development of my property across the street. I would like to be kept involved as plans develop. We intend to develop our west pasture separate from our residence property an intend that the street going north from this intersection lie 100% west of the present centerline of TLR(West). We are pleased that there are no curb cuts on Cantrell. We understand that ball fields may be planned along the Cantrell frontage. This suggests fencing, possibly chain link which is not very attractive. We hope that a combination of berms and heavy landscaping will shield the ball fields and fencing, if any, from Cantrell. We were very pleased to learn that the site will accommodate off street stacking space for all the school buses this facility will require and that all auto traffic will enter and leave through the south frontage. We suggested that the retention pond planned at the SW corner of the intersection be designed to allow future enhancement into a beautiful feature. We believe that the PTA and/or private donations might be available in the future to make this an attractive location for signs, landscaping and a water feature. Finally, we urge that the nomenclature "Taylor Loop Road West" or "Taylor Loop West" be used to distinguish this intersection from TLR (East) a much more well-known intersection. I have long advocated this or some other differentiating nomenclature, to no avail. With the school now locating here, being specific becomes essential. We hope the Planning Commission will grant the CUP for this project. Yours truly, Gene Pfeifer ADDENDUM TO LETTER: Timing of Signalization: I urge that the signalization of the CantreIUTLR(West) intersection be done first rather than last. Cantrell has a slight rise in it at the center of school site making the site distance to and from eastbound traffic very minimal. The increased traffic caused during the construction period is going to increase the likelihood of a very serious accident. There will be a several hundred percent increase in westbound left turning movements into TLR(west), caused by construction traffic, some of which will stack in the left turn lane, and this is going to narrow the window for TLR(West) cars attempting a left turn onto Cantrell. This will cause them to take greater chances and the reduced site distance makes taking chances very dangerous. I URGE THAT THE SIGNALIZATION BE DONE EARLIER RATHER THAN LATER. EMP Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell — Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222- Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net December 15, 2008 Mr. Dana Carney Zoning Administrator Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Revised Conditional Use Permit — West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Mr. Carney, During the initial review of this item by the Planning Commission, I expressed my support of the project subject to two items of concern in my July 2nd, 2007 letter (copy attached highlighter added) to your department. 1. InstaIIation of the traffic si nal prior to construction activities on the school site. All parties agreed that early construction of the signal would make this a much safer project during construction and was a major consideration in the earlier approval of this Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. According to current plans over 8,000 fully loaded dump trucks will pull onto Cantrell and return to this project where the posted speed limit is 50 miles per hour. This $25 million dollar project will generate a huge increase in material delivery and labor going to and from over a 1 '/2 -2 year period mostly generating left turns off of Cantrell. 2. Design concerns for the north leg of this intersection. The intersection of Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop Road was to be designed to allow the future northern extension (fourth leg to the intersection) to be constructed entirely in the pasture area west of my home site. We are working with the School Districts Engineer and Public Works to slightly modify the alignment on the south side of Cantrell to allow this. As to 1 above: I am concerned that the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department's unilateral decision as to the timing of the installation of the signal seems to have been made in complete disregard as to the desires of the City's Staff, concerned residents, the Planning Commission and the Little Rock School District. There is no doubt, that in some communities the school would be built without a signal, only to have the patrons and community descend upon the Highway Commission to build a signal on the State Highway at the Highway Department's expense with only a small portion of the cost at the expense of the local community. If the Planning Commission consents to the proposed modification of the Conditional Use Permit, the residents of the city will not have a signal at this location until the school opens, or heaven forbid, until after there is another serious accident at this intersection that could have been prevented with a traffic signal. I ask that the Planning Commission deny this request and leave prior installation of the signal as a condition of the CUP. Surely, when faced with the reality that their denial of a traffic signal to promote the safe construction of the school, will prevent the construction of the school, the Highway Department will set aside their normal procedures and protocol to accede to the desires of the local community. To my knowledge, neither the Mayor nor any officials from LRSD have lobbied the AHTD for this approval and perhaps that is what is required. As to 2 above: During the course of our work to design the north leg of this intersection in the past weeks it has also come to my attention that the street improvements planed by the School District do not comply with the current Master Street Plan primarily to accommodate the eventual connection to LaMarche. The current CUP provides for one lane of traffic in each direction with a center turn lane on West Taylor Loop. The current Master Street Plan calls for two lanes of traffic in each direction for that section of West Taylor Loop adjacent to the School. I was unaware, as I am sure was the Planning Commission, and the citizens of Little Rock at large, that a variance from the Master Street Plan was included in the earlier CUP. The reduction from the standard should only be allowed if one lane in each direction is adequate for full development in the area, including; 1. The area north of Cantrell Road 2. Areas adjacent to West Taylor Loop south of Cantrell Road 3. The future connection of LaMarche to Taylor Loop Road as per the MSP 4. Traffic associated with the new School 5. Traffic attracted to the signalized intersection and general growth of traffic on Cantrell Road I also understand that the proposed improvements do not contemplate dual left turn lanes from Cantrell Road onto West Taylor Loop or two southbound lanes on the south side of the intersection to accommodate the dual left turns. Again, I have no objection provided the intersection, without costly modification in the future, can accommodate the future growth detailed above and that the cost of any such modification will not fall upon the ownership on the north side of Cantrell. Peters & Associates have prepared an expanded traffic study of the intersection of Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop at my behest. Based upon development of the parcel west of my residence as Office, Peter's study shows that no additional improvements are required on Cantrell Road or on the south side of the intersection. Public Works does not concur with Peters & Associates, and is thus far insisting that additional improvements to Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop, south of Cantrell will be required. At this point it appears that Public Works is insisting on the future improvements not because they are necessary for the intersection to function, but rather because they are required by the Master Street Plan. If that is the case, these improvements should be constructed now, by the immediate developer (LRSD) as a boundary street improvement as any other developer would be required to do. I have a keen interest in this area. It does not take a great deal of time studying the Master Street Plan to realize that my home for the last 44 years is in the northeast corner of what will surely be referred to, in a short number of years, as at the "Intersection of Cantrell Road and LaMarche" just across from the school. I know from multiple experiences that 911 responders are baffled by the existence of two intersection named "Cantrell and Taylor Loop". NOW is the time for this leg to be renamed LaMarche before the school opens. It is my hope that we can meet with Pubic Works prior to the Planning Commission meeting this Thursday and resolve the issues as they relate to future improvements to the intersection and the issues I raised last summer as to the alignment. In closing I would like to reiterate that I am in complete support of the School District in their efforts to construct this school. My position on the two items I have noted has however, been consistent and clearly stated since July of 2007. Best regards, Gene Page 1 of 1 Carney, Dana From: Carney, Dana Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:21 PM To: 'Brad Chilcote' Cc: Bozynski, Tony; 'pfeiferiii@earthlink.net' Subject: RE: My address Brad The recommendation on the West Little Rock School currently reads:Staff recommends that the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road be installed as per AHTD requirements and as coordinated by the City's Traffic Engineer. We are going to add the following additional language: Staff recommends that the City and the applicant pursue through AHTD the installation of a temporary traffic signal to be erected prior to construction and, in the event AHTD approval cannot be obtained, that the applicant work with the City Public Works Department and Traffic Engineer to address construction traffic safety issues. Dana -----Original Message ----- From: Brad Chilcote [mailto:bradc@wddarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:07 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: My address Bradley R. Chilcote, AIA CEFPI LEED AP Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc. bradc@wdd.arch.itects.com wddarchitects.com www.wddarchitects.com 501.376.6681 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secured or error -free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, received late or incomdete, or could contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any error or omission in the contents of this message, which arises as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard -copy version from the sender. 12/18/2008 Page 1 of 1 Bozynski, Tony From: Carney, Dana Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:21 PM To: 'Brad Chilcote' Cc: Bozynski, Tony; 'pfeiferiii@earthlink.net' Subject: RE: My address Brad The recommendation on the West Little Rock School currently reads:Staff recommends that the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road be installed as per AHTD requirements and as coordinated by the City's Traffic Engineer. We are going to add the following additional language: Staff recommends that the City and the applicant pursue through AHTD the installation of a temporary traffic signal to be erected prior to construction and, in the event AHTD approval cannot be obtained, that the applicant work with the City Public Works Department and Traffic Engineer to address construction traffic safety issues. Dana -----Original Message ----- From: Brad Chilcote [mailto:bradc@wddarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:07 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: My address Bradley R. Chilcote, AIA CEFPI LEED AP Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc. 4Yr dc(cr),wddarchitects.corn www.wddarchitects.com 501.376.6681 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secured or error -free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, received late or incomoete, or could contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any error or omission in the contents of this message, which arises as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard -copy version from the sender. 12/18/2008 EMP Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell -- Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222— Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net December 15, 2008 Mr. Dana Carney Zoning Administrator Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Revised Conditional Use Permit — West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Mr. Carney, During the initial review of this item by the Planning Commission, I expressed my support of the project subject to two items of concern in my July 2nd, 2007 letter (copy attached highlighter added) to your department. 1. Installation of the traffic signal wrior to construction activities on the school site. All parties agreed that early construction of the signal would make this a much safer project during construction and was a major consideration in the earlier approval of this Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. According to current plans over 8,000 fully loaded dump trucks will pull onto Cantrell and return to this project where the posted speed limit is 50 miles per hour. This $25 million dollar project will generate a huge increase in material delivery and labor going to and from over a 1 V2-2 year period mostly generating left turns off of Cantrell. 2. Design concerns for the north leg of this intersection. The intersection of Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop Road was to be designed to allow the future northern extension (fourth leg to the intersection) to be constructed entirely in the pasture area west of my home site. We are working with the School Districts Engineer and Public Works to slightly modify the alignment on the south side of Cantrell to allow this. As to 1 above: I am concerned that the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department's unilateral decision as to the timing of the installation of the signal seems to have been made in complete disregard as to the desires of the City's Staff, concerned residents, the Planning Commission and the Little Rock School District. There is no doubt, that in some communities the school would be built without a signal, only to have the patrons and community descend upon the Highway Commission to build a signal on the State Highway at the Highway Department's expense with only a small portion of the cost at the expense of the local community. If the Planning Commission consents to the proposed modification of the Conditional Use Permit, the residents of the city will not have a signal at this location until the school opens, or heaven forbid, until after there is another serious accident at this intersection that could have been prevented with a traffic signal. I ask that the Planning Commission deny this request and leave prior installation of the signal as a condition of the CUP. Surely, when faced with the reality that their denial of a traffic signal to promote the safe construction of the school, will prevent the construction of the school, the Highway Department will set aside their normal procedures and protocol to accede to the desires of the local community. To my knowledge, neither the Mayor nor any officials from LRSD have lobbied the AHTD for this approval and perhaps that is what is required. As to 2 above: During the course of our work to design the north leg of this intersection in the past weeks it has also come to my attention that the street improvements planed by the School District do not comply with the current Master Street Plan primarily to accommodate the eventual connection to LaMarche. The current CUP provides for one lane of traffic in each direction with a center turn lane on West Taylor Loop. The current Master Street Plan calls for two lanes of traffic in each direction for that section of West Taylor Loop adjacent to the School. I was unaware, as I am sure was the Planning Commission, and the citizens of Little Rock at large, that a variance from the Master Street Plan was included in the earlier CUP. The reduction from the standard should only be allowed if one lane in each direction is adequate for full development in the area, including; 1. The area north of Cantrell Road 2. Areas adjacent to West Taylor Loop south of Cantrell Road 3. The future connection of LaMarche to Taylor Loop Road as per the MSP 4. Traffic associated with the new School 5. Traffic attracted to the signalized intersection and general growth of traffic on Cantrell Road I also understand that the proposed improvements do not contemplate dual left turn lanes from Cantrell Road onto West Taylor Loop or two southbound lanes on the south side of the intersection to accommodate the dual left turns. Again, I have no objection provided the intersection, without costly modification in the future, can accommodate the future growth detailed above and that the cost of any such modification will not fall upon the ownership on the north side of Cantrell. Peters & Associates have prepared an expanded traffic study of the intersection of Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop at my behest. Based upon development of the parcel west of my residence as Office, Peter's study shows that no additional improvements are required on Cantrell Road or on the south side of the intersection. Public Works does not concur with Peters & Associates, and is thus far insisting that additional improvements to Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop, south of Cantrell will be required. At this point it appears that Public Works is insisting on the future improvements not because they are necessary for the intersection to function, but rather because they are required by the Master Street Plan. If that is the case, these improvements should be constructed now, by the immediate developer (LRSD) as a boundary street improvement as any other developer would be required to do. I have a keen interest in this area. It does not take a great deal of time studying the Master Street Plan to realize that my home for the last 44 years is in the northeast corner of what will surely be referred to, in a short number of years, as at the "Intersection of Cantrell Road and LaMarche" just across from the school. I know from multiple experiences that 911 responders are baffled by the existence of two intersection named "Cantrell and Taylor Loop". NOW is the time for this leg to be renamed LaMarche before the school opens. It is my hope that we can meet with Pubic Works prior to the Planning Commission meeting this Thursday and resolve the issues as they relate to future improvements to the intersection and the issues I raised last summer as to the alignment. In closing I would like to reiterate that I am in complete support of the School District in their efforts to construct this school. My position on the two items I have noted has however, been consistent and clearly stated since July of 2007. Best regards, Gene & Linda Pfeifer 16300 Cantrell — Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Phone: 501-868-5222— Fax: 501-868-5252 e-mail: pfeiferiii@earthlink.net 2 July, 2007 Tony Bozynski Director of Planning 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: CUP request by LRSD Dear Tony, I will be out of town for the hearing on this matter and would appreciate you making this a part of the Commissioner's packet. Linda and I are very pleased with the overall plan for the school at this location and want to express our support. There are a multitude of more intrusive uses that might have been proposed for this property. We compliment Mr. Vogel and the other owners for making the site available at a price that the LRSD could afford. They could easily have pursued more intensive uses for the property at higher prices and the community owes them a debt of gratitude. We were very pleased to learn that LRSD plans to install the traffic signals for this intersection before construction begins. If there is any thought about NOT doing this, please see my thoughts in support of doing it first, which are an addendum to this letter. We request that the layout of this intersection and the signals themselves be designed to facilitate development of my property across the street. I would like to be kept involved as plans develop. We intend to develop our west pasture separate from our residence property an intend that the street going north from this intersection lie 100% west of the present centerline of TLR(West). We are pleased that there are no curb cuts on Cantrell. We understand that ball fields may be planned along the Cantrell frontage. This suggests fencing, possibly chain link which is not very attractive. We hope that a combination of berms and heavy landscaping will shield the ball fields and fencing, if any, from Cantrell. We were very pleased to learn that the site will accommodate off street stacking space for all the school buses this facility will require and that all auto traffic will enter and leave through the south frontage. We suggested that the retention pond planned at the SW corner of the intersection be designed to allow future enhancement into a beautiful feature. We believe that the PTA and/or private donations might be available in the future to make this an attractive location for signs, landscaping and a water feature. Finally, we urge that the nomenclature "Taylor Loop Road West" or "Taylor Loop West" be used to distinguish this intersection from TLR (East) a much more well-known intersection. I have long advocated this or some other differentiating nomenclature, to no avail. With the school now locating here, being specific becomes essential. We hope the Planning Commission will grant the CUP for this project. Yours truly, Gene Pfeifer ADDENDUM TO LETTER: Timing of Signalization: I urge that the signalization of the CantrelUTLR(West) intersection be done fust rather than last. Cantrell has a slight rise in it at the center of school site making the site distance to and from eastbound traffic very minimal. The increased traffic caused during the construction period is going to increase the likelihood of a very serious accident. There will be a several hundred percent increase in westbound left turning movements into TLR(west), caused by construction traffic, some of which will stack in the left turn lane, and this is going to narrow the window for TLR(West) cars attempting a left turn onto Cantrell. This will cause them to take greater chances and the reduced site distance makes taking chances very dangerous. I URGE THAT THE SIGNALIZATION BE DONE EARLIER RATHER THAN LATER. City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 November 25, 2008 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION Re: West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Citizen: When the conditional use permit was approved for the new West Little Rock Elementary School to be built at Cantrell and West Taylor Loop Road, it included the following condition: The turn lane on Cantrell Road and the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road are to be constructed prior to construction beginning on the site. The State Highway and Transportation Department will not allow the signal to be constructed until the school is within weeks of opening. Consequently, the condition imposed by the Planning Commission cannot be complied with. The item has been placed on the Planning Commission's December 18, 2008 Agenda to specifically discuss modifying that condition to comply with the AHTD requirements. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chamber located on the second floor of City Hall at 500 W. Markham Street. The meeting will begin at 4:00 p.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at 371-6817 or dcartie rr,littlerock.or� Sincerely, kV Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager MONTAGNE COURT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 11/14/08 Dear Dana, We want to express our appreciation to the representative of the architects, engineers and the school district for meeting with us recently to begin our discussion of the building of the school and its impacts on the Montagne Court neighborhood. Hopefully that is but one step along the way in a productive collaboration. We thought it might be useful to quote the minutes of the July 19, 2007 Planning Commission Conditional Use Hearing, File # Z -5646-A, LRSD New West Little Rock School. Wes Lowder, of the Mehlburger Firm made the presentation on behalf of the School District. At the request of the representatives of Montagne Court Property Owners Association, the Commission approved a 40 foot buffer. "He (Lowder) stated the proposed 40 foot wide buffer exceeded the 25 foot requirement of the Highway 10 Overlay District. Mr. Lowder stated the District would work with the neighbors and staff to supplement the buffer with evergreen trees so as to provide a better visual buffer. Mr. Lowder stated they would protect and save most trees in the buffer" It is our understanding that a landscape plan will be developed by a landscape architect and be presented to the Planning Department for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Representatives of the Montagne Court Property Owners would like the opportunity to meet with the landscape architect to discuss the mitigation of issues. As well, we would like to review the plan prior to its submission to the Planning Department. The Montagne Court Property Owners Association appreciates the cooperation given on the part of the architects, engineers, school district and Little Rock planning department in keeping us informed as well as involved in this project. We look forward to continuing this relationship as the planning and building of the school progresses. John Hill is the Chairman of our School Project Committee and has been actively working with the architects, engineers and school district. John may be contacted at 868-1149. Respectf r Don S 'th, President Montagne Court POA John Hill, Director & Chairman School Committee Montagne Court POA Ted Callaway, Director Montagne Court POA Linda Collins, Director & Secretary/Treasurer Montagne Court POA Carney, Dana From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:45 AM To: Moore, Bruce Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Bruce, with ffic As I stated intheearlabvut^this�issuethe Aand Bill HTD was �Henry edresponded eand asaid then Taylor Loop contacted Public Works ts intersectionhit highdoes AHTD willsnotot meet aallowrthessignal�t to beconstructedmeet nuntil until the s isPeration the opening of the school is within weeks of opening. Public Works has instructeweeks d the engineer to schedule pisignal where put iflash two before the opening and operational one weekbeforethe.scheduledopenngoftheschool. The schedule is per AHTD requirements. Dana and I have discussed the issue and decided to take the CUP and the traffic signal condition back to the Planning Commission to review the issue with them. The condition of the traffic signal beingoperational befer ore astart of construction will need to be revised. The item will be placed on the Tony -----Original Message ----- From: Moore, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 10:00 PM To: Bozynski, Tony Subject: Re: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Any updates? ^+ Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -----Original Message ----- From: Bozynski, Tony To: Moore, Bruce Sent: Thu Nov 20 17:14:36 2008 Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) matter after I received Gene's e-mail, but did not pull Dana and I briefly discussed this the file. Dana is off today and tomorrow, but I will get with him on Monday. We both got involved with the traffic signal issue seem to remember that the highway department after the CUP was approved. -----Original Message ----- From: Moore, Bruce Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:02 PM To: Gene Pfeifer; Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Bozynski, Tony Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Tony, Please review the comments from Gene and advise as to the status of the CUP. Bruce 1 From: Gene Pfeifer [mailto:pfeiferiii@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:00 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony Subject: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Dear Tom, A CUP was granted for this project requiring that the signal light be installed on Cantrell before construction. This was a safety consideration that I brought up and that was endorsed by other neighborhood persons knowledgeable about the already dangerous condition of that intersection. LRSD agreed to accept the CUP on this condition. That condition has mysteriously disappeared from the CUP without any notice to me or apparently to others. Please give me a brief opinion on the legality of this action without notice or re -hearing. There are going to be 8,000 (eight thousand) fully loaded dump trucks attempting get started and complete a left turn out of that intersection, competing with westbound left turning folks in the center lane and oncoming eastbound traffic that exceeds 60mph along there with few gaps. The competition between those trucks and the other two movements is going to be FIERCE and DANGEROUS. Then for the ensuing 18 months to two year construction period, $25,000,000 worth of materials will be delivered to that site along with workmen, requiring a left turn movement competing, again, with left turners exiting Taylor Loop and the oncoming eastbound traffic (still moving at 60 MPH). My wife and I have already witnessed numerous bodily injury accidents at this intersection and several deaths. STARTING SOON THERE WILL BE, I REPEAT UNDOUBTEDLY WILL BE, MORE. Now that I have brought this to your attention, my conscience is clear. But I still would like an opinion how a condition of a CUP gets voided without notice and re -hearing. While you are at it, LaMarche will one day dump into Taylor Loop West and the MSP should recognize that and require a larger intersection than the LRSD is being allowed to build. No developer would be shown such consideration. The City seems to be allowing violation Of its MSP to accommodate our impoverished LRSD but someday the City, other developers and citizens will bear the brunt of this unwise decision. Best regards, gene No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1798 - Release Date: 11/18/2008 8:59 PM 2 Page 1 of 2 Bozynski, Tony From: Henry, Bill Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:49 AM To: Bozynski, Tony; Beck, Steve; Hood, Mike Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) The intersection of Taylor Loop West does not meet signal warrants and will not meet warrants until the school is constructed and operational. AHTD will not allow the signal to be constructed until the opening of the school is within weeks of opening. Based on their requirements, we have instructed the Engineer to schedule completion of the signal where it can be put into flash two weeks before opening of the school and then made operational one week before the scheduled opening. This schedule is per AHTD requirements. William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Office: 501-379-1816 Fax: 501-340-4853 Email: bhenryQittlerock.org From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:30 AM To: Beck, Steve; Henry, Bill; Hood, Mike Subject: FW: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) I was hoping Public Works could provide us some information on the traffic signal that we could include in a response back to Bruce about the CUP for the school. As I mentioned to Bruce, we remember that the highway department was involved at some point. I will try to forward the reply from Tom and Gene's follow-up. Thank you for your assistance with this issue. (Steve — did I forward this e-mail to you? Sorry for the duplication.) -----Original Message ----- From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:15 PM To: Moore, Bruce Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Dana and I briefly discussed this matter after I received Gene's e-mail, but did not pull the file. Dana is off today and tomorrow, but I will get with him on Monday. We both seem to remember that the highway department got involved with the traffic signal issue after the CUP was approved. -----Original Message ----- From: Moore, Bruce Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:02 PM To: Gene Pfeifer; Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Bozynski, Tony Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Tony, 11/24/2008 Page 2 of 2 Please review the comments from Gene and advise as to the status of the CUP. Bruce From: Gene Pfeifer [mailto:pfeiferiii@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:00 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony Subject: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Dear Tom, A CUP was granted for this project requiring that the signal light be installed on Cantrell before construction. This was a safety consideration that I brought up and that was endorsed by other neighborhood persons knowledgeable about the already dangerous condition of that intersection. LRSD agreed to accept the CUP on this condition. That condition has mysteriously disappeared from the CUP without any notice to me or apparently to others. Please give me a brief opinion on the legality of this action without notice or re -hearing. There are going to be 8,000 (eight thousand) fully loaded dump trucks attempting get started and complete a left turn out of that intersection, competing with westbound left turning folks in the center lane and oncoming eastbound traffic that exceeds 60mph along there with few gaps. The competition - between those trucks and the other two movements is going to be FIERCE and DANGEROUS. Then for the ensuing 18 months to two year construction period, $25,000,000 worth of materials will be delivered to that site along with workmen, requiring a left turn movement competing, again, with left turners exiting Taylor Loop and the oncoming eastbound traffic (still moving at 60 MPH). My wife and I have already witnessed numerous bodily injury accidents at this intersection and several deaths. STARTING SOON THERE WILL BE, I REPEAT UNDOUBTEDLY WILL BE, MORE. Now that I have brought this to your attention, my conscience is clear. But I still would like an opinion how a condition of a CUP gets voided without notice and re -hearing. While you are at it, LaMarche will one day dump into Taylor Loop West and the MSP should recognize that and require a larger intersection than the LRSD is being allowed to build. No developer would be shown such consideration. The City seems to be allowing violation of its MSP to accommodate our impoverished LRSD but someday the City, other developers and citizens will bear the brunt of this unwise decision. Best regards, gene Ea No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1798 - Release Date: 11/18/2008 8:59 PM 11/24/2008 Bozynski, Tony From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:30 AM To: Beck, Steve; Henry, Bill; Hood, Mike Subject: FW: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Page 1 of 2 I was hoping Public Works could provide us some information on the traffic signal that we could include in a response back to Bruce about the CUP for the school. As I mentioned to Bruce, we remember that the highway department was involved at some point. I will try to forward the reply from Tom and Gene's follow-up. Thank you for your assistance with this issue. (Steve — did I forward this e-mail to you? Sorry for the duplication.) -----Original Message ----- From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:15 PM To: Moore, Bruce Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Dana and I briefly discussed this matter after I received Gene's e-mail, but did not pull the file. Dana is off today and tomorrow, but I will get with him on Monday. We both seem to remember that the highway department got involved with the traffic signal issue after the CUP was approved. -----Original Message ----- From: Moore, Bruce Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:02 PM To: Gene Pfeifer; Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Bozynski, Tony Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Tony, Please review the comments from Gene and advise as to the status of the CUP. Bruce From: Gene Pfeifer [mailto:pfeiferiii@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:00 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony Subject: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Dear Tom, A CUP was granted for this project requiring that the signal light be installed on Cantrell before construction. This was a safety consideration that I brought up and that was endorsed by other neighborhood persons knowledgeable about the already dangerous condition of that intersection. LRSD agreed to accept the CUP on this condition. That condition has mysteriously disappeared from the CUP without any notice to me or apparently to others. Please give me a brief opinion on the legality of this action without notice or re -hearing. There are going to be 8,000 (eight thousand) fully loaded dump trucks attempting get started and 11/24/2008 Page 2 of 2 complete a left turn out of that intersection, competing with westbound left turning folks in the center lane and oncoming eastbound traffic that exceeds 60mph along there with few gaps. The competition between those trucks and the other two movements is going to be FIERCE and DANGEROUS. Then for the ensuing 18 months to two year construction period, $25,000,000 worth of materials will be delivered to that site along with workmen, requiring a left turn movement competing, again, with left turners exiting Taylor Loop and the oncoming eastbound traffic (still moving at 60 MPH). My wife and I have already witnessed numerous bodily injury accidents at this intersection and several deaths. STARTING SOON THERE WILL BE, I REPEAT UNDOUBTEDLY WILL BE, MORE. Now that I have brought this to your attention, my conscience is clear. But I still would like an opinion how a condition of a CUP gets voided without notice and re -hearing. While you are at it, LaMarche will one day dump into Taylor Loop West and the MSP should recognize that and require a larger intersection than the LRSD is being allowed to build. No developer would be shown such consideration. The City seems to be allowing violation of its MSP to accommodate our impoverished LRSD but someday the City, other developers and citizens will bear the brunt of this unwise decision. Best regards, gene No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1798 - Release Date: 11/18/2008 8:59 PM 11/24/2008 Bozynski, Tony From: Gene Pfeifer [pfeiferiii@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:00 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony Subject: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Dear Tom, A CUP was granted for this project requiring that the signal light be installed on Cantrell before construction. This was a safety consideration that I brought up and that was endorsed by other neighborhood persons knowledgeable about the already dangerous condition of that intersection. LRSD agreed to accept the CUP on this condition. That condition has mysteriously disappeared from the CUP without any notice to me or apparently to others. Please give me a brief opinion on the legality of this action without notice or re -hearing. There are going to be 8,000 (eight thousand) fully loaded dump trucks attempting get started and complete a left turn out of that intersection, competing with westbound left turning folks in the center lane and oncoming eastbound traffic that exceeds 60mph along there with few gaps. The competition between those trucks and the other two movements is going to be FIERCE and DANGEROUS. Then for the ensuing 18 months to two year construction period, $25,000,000 worth of materials will be delivered to that site along with workmen, requiring a left turn movement competing, again, with left turners exiting Taylor Loop and the oncoming eastbound traffic (still moving at 60 MPH). My wife and I have already witnessed numerous bodily injury accidents at this intersection and several deaths. STARTING SOON THERE WILL BE, I REPEAT UNDOUBTEDLY WILL BE, MORE. Now that I have brought this to your attention, my conscience is clear. But I still would like an opinion how a condition of a CUP gets voided without notice and re -hearing. While you are at it, LaMarche will one day dump into Taylor Loop West and the MSP should recognize that and require a larger intersection than the LRSD is being allowed to build. No developer would be shown such consideration. The City seems to be allowing violation of its MSP to accommodate our impoverished LRSD but someday the City, other developers and citizens will bear the brunt of this unwise decision. Best regards, gene No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1798 - Release Dote: 11 /18/2008 8:59 PM 11/19/2008 Page 1 of 1 Bozynski, Tony From: Gene Pfeifer [pfeiferiii@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:21 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Cc: Mayor; Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony; Mann, Bill Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Thanks for the prompt reply. This is, and always has been, a safety issue for me. It is actually in my financial interests to see the signals built later, because....... I am seeking a slight redesign of the intersection to accommodate the future development of my west pasture without impinging on my residence too much. It would be easier, cheaper and more likely to get this redesign with a one year to 18 month delay than if we push construction of the intersection. But as I said, this is a public safety issue and I believe a very dire one. Thanks gene From: Carpenter, Tom[mailto:TCarpenter@littlerock.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:12 PM To: Gene Pfeifer Cc: Mayor; Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony; Mann, Bill Subject: RE: CUP for LRSD project Taylor Loop (west) Importance: High Dear Gene, Thank you for the email. had not heard anything about this issue until your email. It seems to me that this is a primary question for Tony Bozynski (who you copied) and for Steve Beck (who you did not). However, both of these people work for Bruce Moore, so I suspect that he will be in contact with them shortly. The only involvement that I have had with this project has been discussions about the appropriate grading permits for the removal of land from one site, and the placement of that dirt on a site involving your property. Our last conversation is that while you may need a fill permit, the grading permit should be obtained by LRSD since they are the entity that is actually doing the work. If, for example, LRSD was to take the fill somewhere in the County, then it is clear that LRSD would need the permit. While your property is closer, there is nothing in the ordinance that exempts LRSD from the grading permit. The fill permit on your part, however, is to assure that if for some reason the fill is not done appropriately, the City can work with you to correct it. know this last paragraph is off the topic, it is just to let you know what I know. On the topic of your email, since the major players work for Bruce, my office will work with Bruce on this issue as he sees fit. Someone should be in touch shortly. Tom No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1798 - Release Date: 11/18/2008 8:59 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1798 - Release Date: 11/18/2008 8:59 PM 11/20/2008 IRCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399 3435 or 371 6863 November 25, 2008 Mayne Adams Little Rack School District 3601 S. Bryant Little Rock, AR 72204 Re: West Little Rock Elementary School Dear Mr. Adams: Planning Zoning and Subdivision When the conditional use permit wa��pred°��p new st t insttle Rock luded the following entary School to be built at Cantrell andTaylor condition: The turn lane on Cantrell Road and the traffic signal at Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop Road are to be constructed prior to construction beginning on the site. The State Highway and Transportation Department will not allow the signal to be ol is within weeks of opening. Consequently, the condition constructed until the scho imposed by the Planning Commission cannot be complied with. The item has been placed on the planning Commission's December 18, 2008 Agenda to specifically discuss modifying that condition to comply with the AHTD requirements. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chamber located on the second floor of City Hall at 500 W. Markham Street. The meeting will begin at 4:00 p.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at 371-6817 or dcarne 9littlerock.org. Sincerely, �W -u�I-t Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager Eugene M. Pfeifer, III Park Hill Partners, LLC Mrs. Robert L. Dix 16623 Cantrell Road, Suite 2A 11500 N. Rodney Parham 2020 Perry Street Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72212 Little Rock, AR 72205 Elizabeth Bizbee 16509 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72223 VFE, LLC 404 E. Kiehl Avenue Sherwood, AR 72120 Tracy T. Windham 20 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 David R. and Betsy Palecek 26 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 John E. and Philia D. Hill 32 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Linda F. Lev 38 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Kaplan Joint Trust 21 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Robert L. and Janis L. Faust 27 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Karen Rambin 16505 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72223 Gateway Investments, Inc. 11 Cameronwood Little Rock, AR 72223 Thelma J. Richardson 22 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Linda J. Collins 28 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Lillian J. Cook 34 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Keri D. Ingraham 40 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Joel F. and Constance Schlosberg 23 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Justin E. and Nancy P. 29 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock Paper Company P. O. Box 25526 Little Rock, AR 72221 Elizabeth A. Robinson 18 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Korte and Wood Construction, Inc. 5608 Copper Creek Little Rock, AR 72223 William T. Granger, III 955 Twinning Drive Bossier City, LA 71110 Dale Dilday and Jane Briggs 36 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Susan R. Seaberg 15 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Willis T. and Elizabeth Callaway 25 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Garrison Jean Brandon 31 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 George G. and Merry M. Smith Marion M. Church Africacion C. Pascual 33 Montagne Court 35 Montagne Court 37 Montagne Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72223 John R. Woodall Kenneth J. Bisbee Maumelle Assembly of God Church 16704 Taylor Loop Road 16511 Taylor Loop Road 1 Pine Mountain Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72212-1511 Roland A. and Paula R. Newton 2505 Wilshire Drive North Little Rock, AR 72118 Marion and Vernon Moore ETAL 16800 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72223 Randal J. Byrne 16714 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Marianne and Terry Floyd P. O. Box 24455 Little Rock, AR 72221 Ernest R. and Betty I. Dubois 16501 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Carl W. and Wm. E. Lancaster 16924 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Empcotex, Inc. Taylor Ten Partnership William L. Adams Family Trust 16623 Cantrell Road, Suite 2A 11219 Financial Ctr. Parkway, # 300 530 E. Riverdale Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock, AR 72211 Orange, CA 92865 Carl W. and Wm. E. Lancaster Floyd H. and Edith Bisbee 16910 Taylor Loop Road 8306 Ferndale Cut-off Little Rock, AR 72212 Little Rock, AR 72223 WITTENBERG DELONY & DAVIDSON ARCHITECTS October 8, 2008 Mr. Dana Carney City of Little Rock Neighborhoods and Planning Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: New West Little School Little Rock School District CUP File Number Z -5646-A (WDD Project No. 08-014) Dear Mr. Carney: Base on our telephone conversation on September 11, 2008 we have attached an updated Site Plan for your review. We have listed below the items we discussed that have been updated from the Conceptual Site Plan submitted with the Conditional Use Permit approved on July 19, 2007: • Building Footprint reduced from 200,000 SF to 103,533 SF. Building area reduced from potential 300,000 SF to 158,000 SF. ■ Bus drive revised to allow building to slide to east away from west neighbors. • Pre -K Parent drop-off drive moved to west side of site and changed to parking lot due to LRSD policy. This should ease street congestion. • We are proposing to construct a right turn lane on the north side of the improved Forest Lane, just west of Taylor Loop Road to ease street congestion. Bill Henry and Vince Floriani of the Public Works Department have preliminarily reviewed and approved this proposal. Please review and call us at your earliest convenience with any questions or concerns you might have. Cordially, Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc. "C" Bradley R. Chilc e, AIA Principal Encl_ c: Mr. Jack See Mr. Wayne Adams Mr. Steve St. Johns Mr. Wes Lowder Mr. Allen Smith 400 W. CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE 1800 LITTLE Rock AR 72201-4806 501/376-6681 5071376-0237 FAX Vicinity Map AREA ZONING Case: Z -5646-A N Location: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANTRELL AND TAYLOR LOOP Ward: 5 PD: 19 0 400 800 Feet CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W24 WOOD I. IANF. (PVT.) LIN 'II It FI KII.I.Oli COVE 1,1 3 T.I: CKY IAN F. (PVT.) FOR63T-UI- f !I Z -5646-A 40 WEST ELEMENTARY 4p CONDITIONAL USE. �. SCHOOL � • °� ' �yy MOOS ER fit Rcni � PC o 17 PDR PDR Q PCD o� 0 pom °�y Q � ❑ I q ono9 LZI s° d d° m a®ban �. w ry, e ❑Q 0: T OMAS PAR SO '70 E3 E22 0 � n N❑ � Q a 0Q e Gl ❑�'] a Z o0 o O� Q E7 d b Q L i y v p 6 d uci� ° � 6 Q o° a� a iLLO 4 w o OS A o o 'R2 o m �� a 9 p�OREST p FOREST [� � PR � . 0R.23 q �f o ' d Q Cb ❑ o -� o-13 a' R2 �q� OQ d o QO J�x o Q 9 o [I� VA►-"` ��4 s'❑ ��' o a .p 4 � �]� ❑ ❑ � o° ca d7 a � a R2 C7 lea pc:iGra f a d D o f� • 'b q o VALLEY CREEK P � 9 G�abdd 4 DEMING o q p .% L Q H Afro Q Q Ix a 6Q< D Q a � Vicinity Map AREA ZONING Case: Z -5646-A N Location: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANTRELL AND TAYLOR LOOP Ward: 5 0 400 800 Feet PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W24 CANTRELL ROAD Z-6546-A� LITTLRSD LE ROCKEST SCHOOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ts City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Wes Lowder The Mehlbu.rger Firm 201 Izard Street Little Rock AR 72201 Date: July 20, 2007 Dear Mr. Lowder: Case No. Z -5646-A Location: SW corner of Cantrell Road and West Ta for Loop Road Planning Zoning and Subdivision This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission at its meeting on July 19, 2007, Approved your application as submitted. Denied your application as submitted. Deferred action to the Meeting. X Approved your application with the following conditions: See conditions outlined in Planning Commission minutes. This is an approval for the USE only and was the first step in the process. Based on this use approval, you may submit your documentation and plans for review and permitting. All new and alteration construction requires building permits be obtained at 723 West Markham, 2"d floor BEFORE any work may begin. All permits required for implementation of the conditional use must be obtained within three (3) years of the date of the Commission's approval or the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked. Please be advised that there is an appeal period for 30 days from the date the Planning Commission made its decision. Any permits obtained or construction performed during this 30 day appeal period is done at your own risk and could be voided by the appeal process. If you have any questions, please call me at 371-6817. Sincerely, Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdi isi n Manager Department of Planning and Development DC/aa M The Mehlburger Firm' PLLC. 201 South Izard Street (72201) P.O. Box 3837 (72203) Civil Engineers ♦ Environmental Engineers Little Rock, Arkansas Surveyors Phone: (501) 375-5331 Fax: (501) 375-7452 Letter of Transmittal TO: Dana Carney DATE: 07-11-07 1 JOB NO: 306-162 City of Little Rock Re: LRSD Certified Letter Receipts WE ARE SENDING YOU via: X I Hand Delivery I I Courier Service U.S. Mail Overnight Delivery Client Pickup the following items: Plans Specifications CD/Disk Shop Drawings Cost Estimate Samples Proposal Contract Change Order X Other Copies Date No. Description 1 Certified Letter Receipts 1 Notice of Public Hearing 1 Certified Ownership List within 200' of Site X As requested Returned for corrections Return Corrected prints THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit Copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit Copies for distribution X As requested Returned for corrections Return Corrected prints For review and comment (Other) FOR BIDS DUE ,20 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: I Let us know if we lack anything else. Thanks for all your help on this! COPY TO: SIGNED: Rachel Taylor, E.I. r i cun.doc 5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PEFORZE T11E LITTLE ROCK PLANNING CO ENTISSION ON AN APPLICATION; FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To all owners of lands1,./ii.'o within 20)0 feet of the 10Ctrndar4' of propel% at: Address: No Address Assigued_ , 09h:/tis General Location: S.W. Corner of Cantrell & TaYlor Loop West Intersection Owned By:. Robert Vogel (And Others) Notice is hereby given that an application for a Conditional Use Permit on the above property has been Filed with the Department of Planning and Development, 723 West Markham, City of Little Rock, Arkansas to allow use of the property as follows: PRESENTUSE: Unimproved (Wooded) PROPOSED USE: K-- 8 School (Little Rock School District) A public hearing on the application will be held in the Chamber of the Little Ruck Board of Directors. 2nd Floor, Cite Hall on: July 19 2007 at 4: 00 P -M. Meetings between the developer, the staff and the neighborhood residents can be arranged prior to the. public hearing if desired. The applicant/developer is Litt_1e Ro,gk School District - Wayne Adams and can be contacted at the telephone number 447-59.50 All interested parties may appear and be heard at said time and place, or may notify the reviewing body of their views by letter. Information about the application may be requested by contacting Department of Planning and'Development, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas; (01) 371-4790. AFFIDAVIT 1 herebv verdfy that i have notifiad all the property i.wncrs of record within X00 feet of the abr:ve described propeny that a Conditional Use Permit application is heinST considered and the public hearing* will be held at the time and place described. Applicant,'Owner or A.uthrrized knnt?: (Name) w, (Date) FIRST PROPERTY TITLE, LLC. 5317 JOHN F. KENNEDY BLOND. NORTH LITTLE ROOK, AR 72116 PHONE 501-687-1121 FAX 501-687-1126 June 18, 2007 The Mehlburger Firm 201 South Izard Little Rock, AR 72203-3837 Attn: Greg Sullivan RE: 200' Ownership Search Results I hereby certify that I have searched the records of Pulaski County, Arkansas to June 1, 'M7 at 7:00 a.m. for the apparent owners of property within 200'of the Project Area for the Little Rock School District. Area described as lying almost entirely within the Northwest `/, of Section 24, T -2-N, R- 14 -W. Also, some ownershi s wf�tl extend int th�..�f rt e �,tion?�Land fhe Southwest'/4 of Section 13, both in T -2-N, R -14-W, as indicated by a highlighted area of a map of said NW %4, Sec. 24, T -2-N, R -14-W, provided by The Mehlburger Firm. I find the following ownerships: Qn C.� G Q O M N O N N a V M p O N s0 N03 p O M �" oo N 41 O N cd N p+ N M O C� caai C 40, A p o � M N CC M N r 0 N 0 cc 0 0 - N Cd 0 U 0 H H 000 O c'1 vv^. a a O O O O blo O � �D O O N Qn C.� G 7� ca Q O M N O N N a V cd O N s0 N03 p O M �" z O l N 41 O N cd N p+ N N N C� caai C 40, � U U a � M N CC M N r 0 N � � O cc - N Cd Q-) U E H H O c'1 vv^. a a O 7� ca O M N O o a V cd cu r O w V O O Cd Q-) U E H H O c'1 vv^. O O O O blo � cu r O w to O O � v M � M N N C�1 N N h h h O O O to 'n to O O O M � M N N 0 rr c�J V U U o h M 00 O ,Y O .cj- p O o 0 rr c�J c� U U jo O jo O (-1 jo O Uo U N U N 7t U N rt C3 cG N( I 2 N O O 2 N O O 3 N 0 G � r C-0nl cGO 0 1 O u u �� M G� • U 00 �' r N O x N as M N M N I� N M o0 CA bA CA N O O O ca cri Cd to xtz O —u--� In t4l) U 0000 O O O U `- �; }�. o ? t U _ v O C) I- O Q N �p 'A N cn ffl c•1 c� O O O O O N N N N N 1 u u �� • U N N r N O x N as M N M N .~� > frl Q f-1 M N M >~ N CA bA CA U�Ur�. ca cri Cd to xtz O —u--� H U U `- �; }�. o ? t U _ v ct O Q N M 44 N u u �� bA ,y CA CA CA bA CA ca cri Cd to O (V N cn ffl c•1 c� (�I 00 M 00 O �n 0 O N M CA M C\1 N c co cc U U 1 0 ama 0 0 0 i C) O an to O � O N O N M CA M C\1 N U r 7 0 U U 1 0 ama �4 N O O O d' 0 O O N ca U N N N .0 � N N � cz; b 3 N � z c a N f -a U U U U U 1 0 °I u z U an to cn � cl � ct t cc z c a N f -a i� Cil O i O O N N 00 O O O c•�7 C� ^Ci M b 03 M M c� N O P4 O M C`! U N CA O+ N N O M 03 O� CO O G� (`•I � cry --�`�' �; ..�• p a cpC ❑ Nt a p N 00 CO O cz as cz ca O r cC O N N ^Ci M b 03 M fV M c� N O P4 O M N U N CA O+ N N O 03 ----r�'-,� � cry --�`�' �; ..�• p a cpC ❑ Nt a p "CJ "C1 O O cz as cz ca JO r cC N M cn M cn c+1 -- cl� �10 00 C� cf) 00 t` .ice I I I O O oc 00 0 0 -- `n N Nw M m� O M G1 00 � Q-c� o-C� -- kn Vn N >? -- LLQ N S3, N �O Q. N 1-4 00 00 N ° I O o 00 00 .ice I I I O O oc U :r r .ice O O oc 00 0 0 -- `n N Nw M m� O M 00 0 Q-c� o-C� � N Q ¢ N >? -- LLQ N S3, N �O Q. N 1-4 N o N o 0 CIS al a: cl fn O oo v rxNZcd r 0 0 0 0 0 1-4 o 0 CIS al a: cl j, 0c �n tn M Q1 �n N CA i coo O 0 (V 00 00 00 O C� cc O O cc G1 O O -C� ct z c7 N O N c�1 in. 44 -- O N N 0 N ;-4�' N M LnW. O. N 0 cq N t\ r 00 n [-110 t:M N r O WU� Q41Q `� .a rJ .� G1 _ate �j •_ -C ❑ r s- r cs o o oe u cc P� "L� CU � 0 cc v °a w N+ H�a 3kno v �C40a -C� ct 0 0 7:5 ,o o 0 0 cc H LL W H First Property Title, .LLC, cannot absolutely guarantee the accuracy thereof and its liability shall be limited to the arnount paid for said report. We cannot certify as to the accuracy of the addresses given, as they are taken from the records of the Pulaski County Assess is Office. Linda Brakebill Escrow Officer First Property Title, LLC rL FT1 r_=1 IF ■ POR CERTIFIED MAiL,,.;RECE1PT (Damestb"88 Only; No ins u Cbvera ge Pro woq#) deff;mrf hromall on wt--dit fittr wo P.aAfr. M-6— Er Postage 'ag CerdiiEd Fee u RtNrn Rocepni FuQPostmark M It Aor"Iraoi ':-!ere A,W'fk'led Delivery Fee I CJ C3 (EMmormw f:iaquirrM) Ln ru Total Postage & Fees M, 0 r3 r -------- M pt.- – ----- X1_ - -- - ------- or PO _,C) iIz LE r-3 L17 J., F EZ] r_3 ITII - certif,"'j Fea Postage CD C3 91'ru"n'Re"im (En(jamem"t Rdqw,wjj Postmark C3�r, s Here z "A'a LO M.ef; .1 ru ioral Pcst--4!,,L W or .10 Eo, , , - sic. -- ---------- �_ 57 . ............. we---- ------------- . ..... Cl ru rq L9 Er Postage 5 Certified Fee 1-3 "ai-4cc0t Fim pFeie Or"Mark U-) r -q _,kotaj Postage Fees $ ru p� Saar Lis 0-1 CA ma ........... r- Or PO Box,Vr,, o, - - -------- rq Ail cr- Postap, Cardfled Fee 2 ED Prsimark Here 1-3 Restricted Uallvtp t F� Postage EZI (Endlorcernent Rtltwi;-jdie Certified Fee Lr] C3 A04.1m Ft=Ipt Fan (EndOFZ!41rrSr.t RacuiW) I fruru T010i Postage & Fees $ IF ■ POR CERTIFIED MAiL,,.;RECE1PT (Damestb"88 Only; No ins u Cbvera ge Pro woq#) deff;mrf hromall on wt--dit fittr wo P.aAfr. M-6— Er Postage 'ag CerdiiEd Fee u RtNrn Rocepni FuQPostmark M It Aor"Iraoi ':-!ere A,W'fk'led Delivery Fee I CJ C3 (EMmormw f:iaquirrM) Ln ru Total Postage & Fees M, 0 r3 r -------- M pt.- – ----- X1_ - -- - ------- or PO _,C) iIz LE r-3 L17 J., F EZ] r_3 ITII - certif,"'j Fea Postage CD C3 91'ru"n'Re"im (En(jamem"t Rdqw,wjj Postmark C3�r, s Here z "A'a LO M.ef; .1 ru ioral Pcst--4!,,L W or .10 Eo, , , - sic. -- ---------- �_ 57 . ............. we---- ------------- . ..... Cl ru rq L9 Er Postage 5 Certified Fee 1-3 "ai-4cc0t Fim pFeie Or"Mark U-) r -q _,kotaj Postage Fees $ ru p� Saar Lis 0-1 CA ma ........... r- Or PO Box,Vr,, o, - - -------- M r_1 Ail Ir Ln 2 ED 1-3 Er Postage 'CERTWItp MA IU- OECEIPT. Certified Fee bn�rre8 11c, mail only; C3 A04.1m Ft=Ipt Fan (EndOFZ!41rrSr.t RacuiW) I Ho", wafte Co werago Pm v, e, d)'Fortte[1�resyliiParrriaffitf PutrkWu r.1:j t y FRE� Ln ED (EFOribm"n. rq nj Lr) r=1 Total Postage & Fees M r_1 Ir 2 1-3 ice 'CERTWItp MA IU- OECEIPT. Her, bn�rre8 11c, mail only; NO fMi - 1:3 wafte Co werago Pm v, e, d)'Fortte[1�resyliiParrriaffitf Ln urn ace.._.:.._._. M r_1 Ir 1-3 Fiw (Endo,sFaIcn, F{jjLjir*i.) C3 Her, P"(iGzed DPINert 1:3 (Etftrs6,11anc Ln rq nj - .0tal.pos-'agE _113 8crre to C3 Iti In or P ----------- ..... .. LO � - 4• .y a Ir Postage a.G r• U.��St2eIVjGr>i= . O Certitied Fee O �etum Receipt Fee �Enderaemart;?equlred). L + l _ Ln r -q Total Postage &Fees r M Resincted Delivery Fee E3 (Endcrsernent Required) Postage LO Hero RECEIPT a Total Postage- & Fees (momeswc ru Only, No rnswa�rce � � 4• .y s x r ` a.G r• U.��St2eIVjGr>i= r O O rh L + l _ Ln r -q Total Postage &Fees r M Return Receipt fan Posimar'c: a 13— Postage i. Hero RECEIPT . L (momeswc Afall Only, No rnswa�rce co rw Certlfied Fse ?osimar;c � ?o;trr•a� 4 i era � a Pelmin Receipt Fee Here ru (Eodoisemert Required' I ,Egr..clallsrery irsYg�[natlnp-.visit. dur.ui2lislta Resiricted I'JeIINa:'/ Fee ® (Erdorsoment Required) a Total Fosta, S Fees ! yj r'9 _a aer.! To F r y r`- orPo GOX NO. 1 � � S � aI � � m {�o - - - --------•-----••- ------ �---- 1 �arS a Er�Postage L a GertitiedFse Pcsimar: Hery � ` a.G r n 0 U.��St2eIVjGr>i= O r'129SP.C'N� f7cllv3ty Fee O (F_rtt{or�rrnantRrxluiLntiy � ' n Ln r -q Total Postage &Fees ru ni Return Receipt fan Posimar'c: CERTIFIEDF (Endorsrr44rn Requlr�,3J I�ltAILI; Hero RECEIPT • (momeswc Afall Only, No rnswa�rce co rw PEG V40) � ru w�+cay.�Jggs.com:= ,Egr..clallsrery irsYg�[natlnp-.visit. dur.ui2lislta at a Er�Postage L a ® ..... —+� 1 " �a.ry,'-L-------- ----------------- - O struef. r -or PO Sox L[j1� Ill -.�.�. = P.... - � x � ~ c w • + hr•�� Lr''u�h�� co 0 a Er Postage a Ce(fitied Fc5 Postmark Her RefurnReceipirF" EJ (PEndorsement Required] GertitiedFse Pcsimar: Hery � , a.G r n 0 Return=.eceiptrea (EndorspnieniRequuedj O r'129SP.C'N� f7cllv3ty Fee O (F_rtt{or�rrnantRrxluiLntiy � ' n Ln r -q Total Postage &Fees ru ni Return Receipt fan ® ..... —+� 1 " �a.ry,'-L-------- ----------------- - O struef. r -or PO Sox L[j1� Ill -.�.�. = P.... - � x � ~ c w • + hr•�� Lr''u�h�� co 0 a Er Postage a Ce(fitied Fc5 Postmark Her RefurnReceipirF" EJ (PEndorsement Required] ry � j. .Cj (� Pcsimar: Hery O , Er Restricted Delivery Fee u �" (Endorsement Required) » � a Total Postage F. Fees Q ni Return Receipt fan sfexlrsaiitiati�Y` �- " E [� Vis:. •. �;.,. . NO X115_ ..11rf79CIILa". RL. a •, .Z t;:s? �: _.- �!�!-i�7fi• � ilil`riiT:riic3iv�ra:: r...�:sr7:: •• ._.- a ' Er � PostagPoN �. CeniMed Fe(End•o Her, (En(jc-rserr!eni I SlLflfQrf� L0 I ru crtai Posiagc Fees $ —0wr D :ill. NC.; I j � r� r� --•^-... rti ::uarM1a. ` Z-` I -------4-I ........... �TJ+ -.7 � --- -- •._ Sent To -0 RL— C3 ;meat, nnr. ka.; �•�+ r� or PC) Box No �� L Cir}; Srure, �r=;;1 �!• n �, ���^-•�-� 11E? 1Fii � ��lo#EFcII�alxNoAssui�JiEe:FiY3ilf�;`.,;is �r ��Fi4t Awwk i D , Er Postage u �" � C-itiiier± Foe f IM Return Receipt fan Posimar'c: � (Endorsrr44rn Requlr�,3J 3 � � Hero • Restricred i7eiiveti - � (EnClpr>e mvfit 1eCjUir�d1 Tita! Pester,. Fees ru [JtA .ertto r o _ 11�rv� �� rat, lFrr hit,: r`- or r-•:_`. fir,;; ?:�. ��1,. 5�1� • IT a • cc•!C. ..r: t J eL• . a LO r-1 Post,.ge = a �• Certified Fee I+f Fost:_ge $ rte-- � L � Cart;fied P.;� IRestriCrtY,Y Celivery ; :;e -I- ,.� C3 C Return Receipt Fee •4 ?cstma O (Endorsement Total Postage Here O Res' dcled Deliver/ Fe (Endorsement Required) U1 r-1 Total Pcstsce & Fees 'yj ru _u song TO j`'� �j�� r, +y� �Ly.wGeTi.1F ._f _I• rL srPOBoxNo._._.________ City, Sir(?i•i__._. aie, Iq FIEU-[SfiAILTpi. RECEIPT (OGi►[eftc.l4falt f3t��y MIa Iitsurr�scr Cauerag©Provi[fedJ Factfflliugty(Eitini'srid#iCtTvlSitour'+►rehsifeaE.,irivw.:miic.rr;rn». a Er a Postage t . H l J Certifies: Fee 0 r{ VL J Postmark ED Return f ROgU.Fee Flora � (Endorsement Required) Restncted Delivery Fac M (Endarsarnem Requlred) U-) fru total Postage & Fees $ O 1 Dr P O a NO ti,,, l l Crh„ Srnla, JFK -1 ;; _."_ y - al Service s�NA _. _ yl Na ltisurance Cavilra� Prut.fcled} `�s7f'Or*jffti1Ilfi ti tl.tit&IL4it[.w sf> aauitatiiiir a:rsi - sent i� r ��t. O Slnyl. Pk7.• .....................• •-W._.4!_..1__._„._ [t nr PO pOX Np- y_ ,moi s” •i: r _ ..sf• .71 (E7arnesElc:lLlalfrlyn Na f{rsuraaGB Coverage l�snuf�fd) --b Certified Fee { , l ►•1 Q Fostmark RO(Urn Recsipt%e Her, 3 (Endorsement t;dis' imd} 4 Restricied Deliven/ Fee p (Endorsement Re,,uirsd) II!] L "total Postageru &Fees r —, --------- - -c----- --- 11- or PO boX No. L ' ..-.:. .............,....._..._._..._._ L:ity; StaPs, ZfAr�d ` os a, erwe Ar CERTIFIED MAIL •,': RECEIPT (L7tarrrestfc M_ _ar_[ �nl�t�,K�r Irrst�� Ca�rerage Pxavide�d) ':' >- -- ty 1 �=osage s CerdNed Fee n Return F!ecetgt Fae Jj t'ostmrcrk O (Endorsement Royuiged i Here i�itrteS+3d l7e�IWiy Ise O (Er�darrerrtQntHW[tuimd) r Ln Total Postage $ Fees I ;i -LU 14 safrr ro���.�� O _ O 5frec4. i�F.IUi.; __ .__ -_-__-_-_-..-__-_-.._-._..__.____r r or PO Box No - Cir% S1:rr�r. Z!Ji^rr''�s�d .••�y,S�. U_S. Postal Service,-,, _ PAR.TIFIE© MAiLt':.►'REGEi {aF7ro ie iFc y. Ma ❑i Vmncv cawe rovlrlei# ' ��1['pasY�'TriCvr>z]'4��v�g1L.s}ius•v�ehairr:atsv'r�-:si;us}�:essii�_ J m L o,stage V � CPr4Stnti �a� r • � � I ?nsirnark Fla1GrR F'.dCE t I."L (EadWr:er:rosYl+�gttigad] ReAtFWAOd fi6lIver cea [] (Efido[Erb7f4'RI Hirtr:lmd) I LO rlu Total Pcst �7e 3 Ezes i ,1 � 5rrdlr:f:.r. P:n: 1 E City, '51ata. zu'z ! •lei t:,rrr _ -- .�."��{�r,r r - �L� �n �.�� �� r ZI Post,.ge �• Certified Fee I+f O Return FL ,-)jpr; ❑ f�c�::ira+ir Pcseark Hera � (Ei;dorsemeni � IRestriCrtY,Y Celivery ; :;e (Erdor;emgnl `?erp:iter; - l Total Postage %i+ jf sent i� r ��t. O Slnyl. Pk7.• .....................• •-W._.4!_..1__._„._ [t nr PO pOX Np- y_ ,moi s” •i: r _ ..sf• .71 (E7arnesElc:lLlalfrlyn Na f{rsuraaGB Coverage l�snuf�fd) --b Certified Fee { , l ►•1 Q Fostmark RO(Urn Recsipt%e Her, 3 (Endorsement t;dis' imd} 4 Restricied Deliven/ Fee p (Endorsement Re,,uirsd) II!] L "total Postageru &Fees r —, --------- - -c----- --- 11- or PO boX No. L ' ..-.:. .............,....._..._._..._._ L:ity; StaPs, ZfAr�d ` os a, erwe Ar CERTIFIED MAIL •,': RECEIPT (L7tarrrestfc M_ _ar_[ �nl�t�,K�r Irrst�� Ca�rerage Pxavide�d) ':' >- -- ty 1 �=osage s CerdNed Fee n Return F!ecetgt Fae Jj t'ostmrcrk O (Endorsement Royuiged i Here i�itrteS+3d l7e�IWiy Ise O (Er�darrerrtQntHW[tuimd) r Ln Total Postage $ Fees I ;i -LU 14 safrr ro���.�� O _ O 5frec4. i�F.IUi.; __ .__ -_-__-_-_-..-__-_-.._-._..__.____r r or PO Box No - Cir% S1:rr�r. Z!Ji^rr''�s�d .••�y,S�. U_S. Postal Service,-,, _ PAR.TIFIE© MAiLt':.►'REGEi {aF7ro ie iFc y. Ma ❑i Vmncv cawe rovlrlei# ' ��1['pasY�'TriCvr>z]'4��v�g1L.s}ius•v�ehairr:atsv'r�-:si;us}�:essii�_ J m L o,stage V � CPr4Stnti �a� r • � � I ?nsirnark Fla1GrR F'.dCE t I."L (EadWr:er:rosYl+�gttigad] ReAtFWAOd fi6lIver cea [] (Efido[Erb7f4'RI Hirtr:lmd) I LO rlu Total Pcst �7e 3 Ezes i ,1 � 5rrdlr:f:.r. P:n: 1 E City, '51ata. zu'z ! •lei t:,rrr _ -- .�."��{�r,r r - �L� �n �.�� �� a.i.•'r �-ri:e' J• _.s,.Y :-1'; '"; . rq3I ' s � Er Pesta�ey - p Ln MSIMMK37 Uy" I - m Postage Sm T3 r �~ _.....?� --- - - ------ - ---- r� Srraur, rtpr. rtc ; j�- or PO So,, �•� ,r]idrd, 7117,.E . .-""-••- -•• L#:S. Pc)5t8l SetvLce,, CERTIFIED MAIL,-, RECEIPT -. E�7ant��l[c M�.Fin►Y� Nrr insu��tca Carrerage Praufdedj F.c.dEiralYtQf}uis{CG.urjp�ebslf:at.Ytitilviesp9.caRt e Car'.itied R:. r � octal Post ago 2. Fens y�! Ins r!: ceitiNed Pee Return Receipt Fkm -I- Here 0Pestma: Relum Receiet f -aa .C.Y _`!-•__.J�� ;:try; 5:s4:•-'IP_.j . k p Ralurr ecciat Fee � f,Enu-or6em4m Requirr r Tera � (Endorsement Required) O (Endorsehwnt.q*quired) Lrl r nesimc;ed Delivery Pee r -i -Total Postage& Fees Restt:cted Celiver;; Fe p (Endorsement Required) O (Endorsement Required) . ,tal Pcstage & Fees notal Postage 8 Pees ru ru Sm T3 r �~ _.....?� --- - - ------ - ---- r� Srraur, rtpr. rtc ; j�- or PO So,, �•� ,r]idrd, 7117,.E . .-""-••- -•• L#:S. Pc)5t8l SetvLce,, CERTIFIED MAIL,-, RECEIPT -. E�7ant��l[c M�.Fin►Y� Nrr insu��tca Carrerage Praufdedj F.c.dEiralYtQf}uis{CG.urjp�ebslf:at.Ytitilviesp9.caRt e � scnr o �� .T., �-�--�------ ---- p arrser, Aran. Na.; 4 I r+- or PO Sox P/o. ! ... .__. - --- 9 ratty sire �r•�a Z.�'� � � �� .,poste[ Certified Fee r � octal Post ago 2. Fens y�! Ins r!: Return Receipt Fkm r— Here � � (Endorsement Reguirx ) .C.Y _`!-•__.J�� ;:try; 5:s4:•-'IP_.j . ._�L D r Res,'dct*d Oetivety,Fee i� (Endorsehwnt.q*quired) Lrl r r -i -Total Postage& Fees ru � scnr o �� .T., �-�--�------ ---- p arrser, Aran. Na.; 4 I r+- or PO Sox P/o. ! ... .__. - --- 9 ratty sire �r•�a Z.�'� � � �� .,poste[ 5e vic :fk � octal Post ago 2. Fens y�! Ins r!: A! i:7 IUC. I _ t �r L.,. � � �L L ...................... .C.Y _`!-•__.J�� ;:try; 5:s4:•-'IP_.j . ._�L AM r C.erii:ied Fee ] ! _ '^► � 041Q -CJ Postmark Return Receipt Fee (Endorernert Required) O Rest.,miLl Detrvtxy F -m p (Endcrsernen! Requrcr:r!) u1 r�l notal Postage a r-,-:t� $ L • D ru j r �C[ry: Stale, -OF�f •• - •:--- � --� Sara ro .,.------------------- ------ Of' ----- [�- J--- BOX Na. _.__. jA Circ ��ate, Z'P;-�f ( a- Er Postage a Cer•.i`ied Fee Rrth Receipt'�) I Hera 0 (Endorsement Required) `6 E O Restricted Deliv C:3 Fee (Endorsemera Required) tr Total Postage 8 Fees $ ru _n Sur+r To a crr�, sram. �rp�3 .,a fTlt+�• r'�i?l� Sa'3i�i Er Ep. C3 rqIr Pcstana S Garti!ied Feel � ] Prstmar.l• 0 Rerun Recaipt Pae (Endorsement Regcired; f�' ere O O Reslric!acl Delivery+:a (Endorsement Recuired) � octal Post ago 2. Fens y�! Ins r!: A! i:7 IUC. I _ t �r L.,. � � �L L ...................... .C.Y _`!-•__.J�� ;:try; 5:s4:•-'IP_.j . ._�L 3 r t7r ! No 1tr5ursnce Ceuertt aPravidec ' Y;.... (a q4 ?I ¢psiteest-r-vusp�ca- Ceitiriad ! e *D o� tiY J Posmarl O Flehlm ?otf?o' : +7d r�x Here .ndarserrw reo ( J Resrricted Fee p (Endorsement 9equirud) Ln t 7 t I rctai Postage ReesrLI ' i -a UA PoSf6l 5€rvi�6= CERTIFIED MAIL.,.- _ (Da esir�. �Ila13 OcrtY;. v Insurance CavoArovided j U.S.- Postal Sertilrce F�ainesl[c Mall ir1nl�1; �Co fctsurance Gverg� pto- FOr defN'-r;_ry filfOrIiiafgoirvi9it uurVi#Sft&it! vnx�r:usys �gf3]tr i- Cernied Fee . OEM _stmarit Return Receipt Pee (F_necrsement Required, ' 1e•,_ Restricted Oeliverr Fee >] (Encr.rsamentRequiieu). rl rcial Posrage 3 Fees .0 a�rtr to t n ED rt or PO Oox No. �2 � to OY AJC Giry, ste', ZlF':=4 ti. - -- ar �tiarit tic mqi! Onty, Na In , I- Certified Fee(05 Certified Fee O Postmai k Flee= Receipt.= t] HeUxnt Rocei t Furl Postman Endcrstr:tt--nt Requi eC} Here 0 p•. / i ycr 5 (Enccrsanent ,equf-%) Q F's lrlct0d Ct Riqu Fes p (Enrler&9met]tRnr�uir ) Restricted Lnt Re nr Pee � p (Endorsement Required) Total Postage &Fees M T ri '-t.' � � � Totai Postage &Fees v ED S�reat ,opt. Nc.; -•------•. -- ------------- [� or PO Box No. a � C ..... Zf. -----•- ••---•- ........ ------- A.. a •, 117 Postage ,5 , .CenffiedFee10 raeturn P ,ar,3tpi F,313 Postmark 10 (Endcr[µyn6ntAegt;ir..elj Here >] , RuGuicted Oethtly M (ErtOOr: LmSlitFiar�uir9fJ) LO r -i Tcts)Postage & Fees $ rIJ Y Saw rij ob r* or PO so, rYc i p � i ' P—a c,\e ..n Surf r, O SN+Qar, f, nto.; rti or PO Box No. -4W--•---G��py�` cr7y, state, ZIP+4 Gf V�I� ra 0r r'osiage $ , _,.ert'tfied Fee cici Pastrnar'< Return Receipt I e:' (Eodor;sment Pegwretl) ii?asiricted Oellveri Fes p (Enc7cssernenk Ragitlredl LO -Totn!ru Pcsta;,e 2. Pecs w r ACAf.� EJ �-�- 0 i= orr0?o --- .{ y'�U^y (,4�j,F� t —,-.........._. L: � 9 w. Fu Ln rq Ir Postage rq Certifled P.. Postmark Oetyrn Agcelp4'-s2htd( l n Hera t£tMiruc�nrsni Fog lmdJ0r] IEndcr83n.'ntP{0lftired) Lr)iP� rocs! .'�-]6�'r'p � f-aS ru 1.J(� .i�. .-----•---_........ ror POBoe Flo. , ,--------••--••--- GYu SPa!e,z7f'+ 1 �t ■ 'CER S RECEIPT Ln P n 0 a • tit ' Q' Postage .3 Cartifiecl Fee O �'1 Postrnar;c Return Recsic(Fee Fere I= !Endorsement rlo6uired) �} IZI n'estricted Delivery Fee (Enclorsemont Required) U•7 rq Tota; Postage & Fees b ru ..A set# )b [L or PO Box ,�io. �g Y N` c � V� --- - - . ---•---•---._�_..._..�.... .�_. r... Stare, ZIP-- _ fQ (LI � 4 i A 4 ■ ■ ru 7 ,7 q ru Ir a Postage Certified FF, V� Postmark m Roltrm Receq' u r") , i ;Endrrs[iiten¢ Requiraal] dere O 1�25trir:Fad Dr�fy�lry'rQ4 O ($tiQCrsemer,tfjpf;fri[.tl] fotai Postage & r.=r-s ti . ,J3 S,vfr ru �}• J O ". e sill���ifi?�'�SEa��;4_tl�P•�t!si;�f aEy�yt►;�#Ir[� �;: � ';.ti ra Er Postage $ ► i r -i Cerifiod Pee p Return rie FF,;,,Ham C3 S J Pc>inurM: far delt�ery Fntiv�tzra4�ort,vl'si>r rife�sffx at:�¢R!Yius�isscssn� (Endorsement Required) r Restticred Deiivegr Foe p (E .dorcement Required) F �J Total Postags& Feas ru —a sent 70 T ") CkA , ED r- or PO Box No.Itnr+ GrJryc.SiaAi, ZiP+-S UU' r: ....44_++.''._.��_ _................ . r ;. ull lv. �(EfG•a!iso,!�I1f71�[Sr�NgbrSq►'aru�Cav�a'�rr'.Provfdecij o� ra ra Postage I ' . Ll Certified Fee PosenReim SeC?IGL ra= 0 (Endorsemznt RequiratS} Here Rastricted Delivenr Fee f p (Endorsement Requii_d) U-1 r'9 Total Postage & Fees r Li sear ro o srra�r �c ve.: y, � r'--�orPOBox `do. tt`� ;r a ✓..... Fcfal Postage. =a., ru zip 1)2 - — ---- — ------- : Li► '$lPr~ 14failf%T{jp; [4fs711F51Jr317CeLr'overage Ptawfifec � far delt�ery Fntiv�tzra4�ort,vl'si>r rife�sffx at:�¢R!Yius�isscssn� r F Fcfal Postage. =a., ru zip 1)2 - — ---- — ------- U.& POW Serifice - �IL_, CEWT r . L rage P _ "'"�vn',s+;v.rfaps,critYCv:. � .;artifisd Fse I frt p I % Postmark R=turn aecai t ���a ® (�ndcrr:mant Ragt.irsu�) Fere teSMctcd Ceiivery ,=ee p (Endoisamen[RegOred) k r -q Total Postage N, Fees •g C C r C3 Er D' Postage S LAI Car5flad Fee. Postmark ED Return Receipi Fee .��`} Here p (Endorsement Re-quired) u R@gTGCt$L Gejm 4Y, ,S7e 1:3 (ef7llrfsCa>ws7ntifaJ[lired) r-99 Total Postage 3: Fees ru - �.:rr[ rn --� M srrr.Apiw, orPO ---------------------------------------- 1 , j. Sm r co %Mf Tc p �• ! h '' rr Postage kC' $ L a - - ........_ -— ......., �...._.._ Ln r. p Re:um Pecsipt Foe Postmark r_ Her,-, M (�ndGrSriGq:FY:i.•::. E Restricted Delivery Fes p (Endorsement Required) � Postage t$ r -R Total Postage 3u Fees 2 Cartt"ned Fee . Postm Return Receipt Fee F Hera (Endcrs2n i"" . 'g,i i ") p Restricted Lalivcra Fse p (Endorse!nen[ Loi: rcd) r9 I'ctci ?- r7J srarce A Foss �� G�17@StrGi`lf1F!'i��.Q�f!'StifBlYCB'lr.dl(g7l4r�d311�V�pF�C p _ E' Postage $ Li Certified Fee p f39111fR P,e4itlp! Feet/ L*J Posimar!< � (EndartrP�l:3nt Fldauired) He:'' Fe?iyl ilC.pil Dell'.,tty Fgd C3 (Fax na+ment naCt:ir�rlj 117 r'9 Total Postage h Fees 's ni —0 :enrip C3 UA 0 VIA PO vox Alo, _ ._...._. __.... ............. ¢Aorrteslr¢ gait Only; IP& lnsumnca Coverage PM • livi�ry {: "` -3ip� vissL'nur.,arehsitgrsti uvy�r.tasps.criin ;. � %Mf Tc p �• ! h '' rr Postage kC' $ L r -i - - ........_ -— ......., �...._.._ Genn lou Fee p Re:um Pecsipt Foe Postmark r_ Her,-, M (�ndGrSriGq:FY:i.•::. E Restricted Delivery Fes p (Endorsement Required) U-) Total Postage 3u Fees ru � %Mf Tc OStreet, r- ApL No.; or PO Box ;vo. U n-) - - ........_ -— ......., �...._.._ r.� i Service .:, Q MAlLrl.. RECEIPT j�1L N1 h7SVrarrce Catiferag-- Prov(cred) - � R�ifSIiG4R.�',r7fi�IG a�QiYl1�.R1Bp?,C,OiYt� . O per-• Postage r-9 C.er?ffi_d Fae S p fZ3h1[n RRCeip! Fr'k � +C ; er•� ;'oGir"ar'S C] (Enderselllcni Ft. ,,,i p HeWricted Vol" F?+, p (Coot l rserrrera C'IXg4 inw)Ln �— r -g Tgtai Fcstage 3, FeeS I $ r u '+C ]]� � o�k— fpe �� ........._._.... PEI— •� :..�Y.� sem- k�.�e:'�.. PrsrmaAc Her, Saar rn r. --1 ai' PO F3rsx N., 3 6i Srs10,.21P44 A a Lf' Postage 5 �Q I _ 'rusam R - - e+urner,.ict Fee He1e ® (F_ndorsernent Requirrna) Restnrtsri !Deii,,er? Pee (Endcraamant Required) L11 a Total Postage u Fees ru Sent is �n .__. � or PO Sox Nc. � �� J YIN Cr1y $[awa. 'IP+'r•� a a Er Postage $ Postage 1 _� Carti`.ied Pee Certified Fee LL leaum Rer,6 pt Fee �''] Postmark Rerum Receipt Fid ' Postmark �'fe O (Endcre,ncnt Ruirad} 3• V O (EndorsemBnt Requir�l} ;Lara Ies'riciW Flapg6 ed D4wiry Fea (Endorsernom AN irna) O (CJ1(iG1; MG'Ilt F {H=ired) Lr7 U3 . Total Postage R Fees `, fall Total Postage ;t=ees �� scar zo Li hc,VOL -s Sif.NBr„ayr. +VO„ ••.�_ _.-._._- 0 SSFfsB� A.. No.-__. __-. N^ ......_._..__.____._ ..... ...«........ or PC Box No. 3 $ R � or PC Box No. 3n I Y l Cr2y; Stela. -1Rrd •y '•�'-•.•_._.. .._ ! --------------- — -----Cit/ SFsta Z!1'rJ. � --- ---- Postal CEOTIFIED walml wisill-m M 717 1111 M wMalmlsim. J. U— Pcstace y 1 a Certified Pee C� r rL Postmz k p Ratsrrn Renici Fje J (Endersameni Require.!) [_] Hera O Res°.ricred F- (Endorsemeri eq`,.,uf_tl D Ln Tote! =oslage A l=ee - ]( ri.i� A V r Or PO Gox 110. 1 C�qs Sia�u rip• •r -•-••� • - ”" � . y 'f N rte. r r• r Er i�•i Er ni M I Q' Postage 5 a $ i ] ceriiiea Pee Ir R=.iurn Receiot Fe6J � j6u;orement Regwredj Il a Cariried Fee 7l ;iricted Deii•vm Fee ` -� (c.,dorsement Re ,uirad) rr, Return Feceipt Fee F,egwred) a Total Postage 1, Fees ni PrsrmaAc Her, Saar rn r. --1 ai' PO F3rsx N., 3 6i Srs10,.21P44 A a Lf' Postage 5 �Q I _ 'rusam R - - e+urner,.ict Fee He1e ® (F_ndorsernent Requirrna) Restnrtsri !Deii,,er? Pee (Endcraamant Required) L11 a Total Postage u Fees ru Sent is �n .__. � or PO Sox Nc. � �� J YIN Cr1y $[awa. 'IP+'r•� a a Er Postage $ Postage 1 _� Carti`.ied Pee Certified Fee LL leaum Rer,6 pt Fee �''] Postmark Rerum Receipt Fid ' Postmark �'fe O (Endcre,ncnt Ruirad} 3• V O (EndorsemBnt Requir�l} ;Lara Ies'riciW Flapg6 ed D4wiry Fea (Endorsernom AN irna) O (CJ1(iG1; MG'Ilt F {H=ired) Lr7 U3 . Total Postage R Fees `, fall Total Postage ;t=ees �� scar zo Li hc,VOL -s Sif.NBr„ayr. +VO„ ••.�_ _.-._._- 0 SSFfsB� A.. No.-__. __-. N^ ......_._..__.____._ ..... ...«........ or PC Box No. 3 $ R � or PC Box No. 3n I Y l Cr2y; Stela. -1Rrd •y '•�'-•.•_._.. .._ ! --------------- — -----Cit/ SFsta Z!1'rJ. � --- ---- Postal CEOTIFIED walml wisill-m M 717 1111 M wMalmlsim. J. U— Pcstace y 1 a Certified Pee C� r rL Postmz k p Ratsrrn Renici Fje J (Endersameni Require.!) [_] Hera O Res°.ricred F- (Endorsemeri eq`,.,uf_tl D Ln Tote! =oslage A l=ee - ]( ri.i� A V r Or PO Gox 110. 1 C�qs Sia�u rip• •r -•-••� • - ”" � ). 7sL' r. r 'f N rte. r r• r Er Er M I a Pastagc $ i ] Ir a Cariried Fee ` -� �- Return Feceipt Fee F,egwred) • iY Postmark H re /1 �1�-� �J (Endo(sement ] 0 Restricted Deiivenr Pee (E-,dor=ement :=i»cij redlLrl ='].St3l]i'. � � .:.tai . � c•BJ . �JLA. M 3arr To _ 4. 0 !�S[r�e+.•r1g1}Vi7. ..... r!•!�'1�l�� n�•-i---L=� ...--••-----•:j 1 IEI i ,�j(II,,� GSrly; st.:te. rr=•i �i�" ����f a ..._ ..._._ � Cartiiled Fee 1 ,r O fC Postmark vieturn Receipt tee Here (Endolsemon[ Required) 0 R-suicted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) LCI r -q 'Total Postage & Fees rl_1 .11 YO TO 1 . 111L b J_. /4 ------------� -- ----- p Street, Apf. No.; [ti or PO Box No.�t 21 f t - , m i. - a ru a• rq r�-R Postage 3 { �- Certiiic-d Pae ED C3 C30[ Rffiwna9 (Endorsernant POSUTIZOk S � Hera ru Rc�uined) Ln A"da[ed Odkerr Fie (Emnamarrr4nt 'AAgtrlmi" Ln Isndorscmer,t. yr(vlrx�j Er Pcslaga ;y • �'-•� -- r Total ProstaUgr d, c: es j jj }!RIIRR ;-I@C`.'. i17I 1' 7r7 Er- Hfije 4 here J EnCnrry3r. nt Required] r p RestnetGo Deliver"/ Fea 'Endo rsemeW iRaquirad;• t Lit Postmark rU FU Total Postage & Fees Rei a (E:�dorsementt Acquired) o...i sow ria YbcJ- 3,x O Sr; c -Di, - - - _------._.._ CIEy, $fete, 2iP+4 r Lr) Er i . 4 �: ar• a _. Tctel 1 E AI ED ra Postage S LLQa' r-9 � Cartiiled Fee 1 ,r O fC Postmark vieturn Receipt tee Here (Endolsemon[ Required) 0 R-suicted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) LCI r -q 'Total Postage & Fees rl_1 .11 YO TO 1 . 111L b J_. /4 ------------� -- ----- p Street, Apf. No.; [ti or PO Box No.�t 21 f t - , m i. - a ru a• rq r�-R Postage 3 { �- Certiiic-d Pae ED C3 C30[ Rffiwna9 (Endorsernant POSUTIZOk S � Hera n Rc�uined) A"da[ed Odkerr Fie Restric[ea Letery F=or: (Emnamarrr4nt 'AAgtrlmi" Ln Isndorscmer,t. yr(vlrx�j Ln Ln -- r Total ProstaUgr d, c: es • [7 �11 $efrr To r - - - - o ` � .�. C�Y� � Sir,rEf,rSpf Na:................`rti[.tiE----------- ----------- C A- -�.---�... \^n ,a Sant To f ED D D- or PO Sox 1140. cl[y, state, z1P+•' .-(C7gMCSAC Mail OWY, PAP InSUMAM COV&Mge. Pro Vide ellV6 f' fcrniatfc,ri.tils.�t nirr.wepsfte a[ nrr �.i Sps,ccirh 0 Er Postage S r•i cortifird Fee 1 _ EZI Return Receipt F=;e V� P-slmark 1=1 (L=ndccsement Required) Resirk Arid Cetfvnr,,y Fau CD (Endo snrnOnt Fl;,, fru Total Postage& Fees �j r Sony To ._�..._..------ w ---------- O �rroer, .Ipi fL .af PO.''bx.No.,1a, LNy, 5100.2f�4-9 U.S.i Service -" GEF TIRED P1A1U-;RFCE1PT stle Iain Qnry; Na trfstr�aCuv�� F4!e�i low slCc�41 .'0 dOP �•• c�N,lcd see ED Relum Remi pt O(Encrcm,aT ll RequIr"', A"da[ed Odkerr Fie (Emnamarrr4nt 'AAgtrlmi" Ln Ln I cl r jj Er- Pes;aga J �• ,;.--rtiriad Fee Postmark Fee Pm { Hera Rei a (E:�dorsementt Acquired) Restricted Leliver/ t=ee p {Endorsement Required) Lr) r i Posiace & Fens �# U, "6U Tctel ,a Sant To f ED D D- or PO Sox 1140. cl[y, state, z1P+•' .-(C7gMCSAC Mail OWY, PAP InSUMAM COV&Mge. Pro Vide ellV6 f' fcrniatfc,ri.tils.�t nirr.wepsfte a[ nrr �.i Sps,ccirh 0 Er Postage S r•i cortifird Fee 1 _ EZI Return Receipt F=;e V� P-slmark 1=1 (L=ndccsement Required) Resirk Arid Cetfvnr,,y Fau CD (Endo snrnOnt Fl;,, fru Total Postage& Fees �j r Sony To ._�..._..------ w ---------- O �rroer, .Ipi fL .af PO.''bx.No.,1a, LNy, 5100.2f�4-9 U.S.i Service -" GEF TIRED P1A1U-;RFCE1PT stle Iain Qnry; Na trfstr�aCuv�� F4!e�i low slCc�41 .'0 dOP �•• c�N,lcd see ED Relum Remi pt O(Encrcm,aT ll RequIr"', A"da[ed Odkerr Fie (Emnamarrr4nt 'AAgtrlmi" Ln Sam -0 lAty�y G i � � ��re+er..•1�i. Flo; � .. . •--•- 1L 'h.i .. n.. f Mr rel r _stag= Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endcrsament!�equired) Ej Resvich, A Oeflverj Pee (Endorsement Reqijin�d) LrI r -q Total Postage & Fees ru rL Ik4 !']k(4 (� Postmark Here Ln M Ir - Postage L C E, 'd Pee Return 9e,c ip, Her;- (EndorspmentRegiz, Restricted Deliver," Fee C3 Endorsement Required; LO r-9 Total 'Postage & Fees M CI Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee E3 (Endorsement Required) nrsL'af C3 U-) F -q Total Postage & Fees rij ."I Postmark Here -a ant To ....... -------- - ---- - ------------ ----- -.--•-•-•--.------•-•-- o - C3 resat, adz[ FRa or .... ............. ------------------- sent', ZIP44 icityS9-C) OF, I F.M. ITIMMM, Zia U-) Er" Postage Certiflea Fee Pc)sti-nark C:1 Return Receipt Fee Here E:3 Return Required) FLsiricied Deflvpry Fee C3 IEnljcr3,3.7cfa Roquirad) Ln rr'=fel.!Total Postage Fees Salt ra ------------- ........ ED OT No. WV, CO LrI LrI Er Postage Ceritified F?e Ej Postrnar% Return.9bcaip F (Endorsement Required) Here Resiriciec DElivory Fee C3 (Endorsement Required.) LfI r-9 Total Postage & Fees ru Son( To O --- Ti tZ ------------- ------ ----------- ' 4pl. M.: r`- orPOBOXIVO. ----------- I ---------------------------- ---- - ------------------ - ------------------ C1,Y, State, zr-+�( P-0 Ck- r-q U1 EZ11 rq Ir Posiace r -q Caniffied Fee C3 ReturnReceict Fee (Endorsement,9,c. Lj red) C3 IOU Restricted GeNveill Fee (Enc.rrspmem Lrl r -q$TL,.irll ai Postace � -eIS 74 .... ?Q-11- �-- .......... .... . ...................... ...... SO -VI, *f. No.. Sur( Taa z Im 1V-- f ,..rLC�.__..__._ .- -0......... .. O Sfl�6i .4FT ..._ �Crry, 5lrrra, 2'IPi� --- (Damesiff.•C Mail Or7[Y;. No Insurance Qoverasse ProvidoQ C~ardC{iv�FY intor�nalfor�.vlslt our eves{E�s�f visuiti usps:cn t Canified Fee � Return Receipt FaeHere U.. l ustmaii: M CERTINEQ MAIL-;. RECEIPT 11 (f3OW6r ac Im9wonly, jVgfdsaranca Qvrierage FrOvided) Rusftked DenveN Fee p (Endoraamant Required) gµr5vesil ai"+rrHr� usps.calli,- Ln Fr1F'celt�9rSI frifc;rtatign,iels'if – – rq Total Postage & Fees ru I$ rxi Postage Certified Fee az r Pcstrnarlk q0turn Rwapt pea Here ■ -q '� I r TOW Postage = Sur( Taa z Im 1V-- f ,..rLC�.__..__._ .- -0......... .. O Sfl�6i .4FT ..._ �Crry, 5lrrra, 2'IPi� --- (Damesiff.•C Mail Or7[Y;. No Insurance Qoverasse ProvidoQ C~ardC{iv�FY intor�nalfor�.vlslt our eves{E�s�f visuiti usps:cn t Canified Fee � Return Receipt FaeHere L•--- l ustmaii: M o -(Endorsement Required) ED Rusftked DenveN Fee p (Endoraamant Required) Ln – – rq Total Postage & Fees ru I$ ,� ssrtr ro ' ji - Uify, Slafa, QIP+4 ME €. s Postal Service CERTIFIED,_ AIL -1 RECEIPT :(a mp, ia 14Fa±1 O ., {� lnsu> ance Covcglpg , Frmviiiccf) !$' [>��... __ " (���yIL51{Sd�,Fl:i¢9.CAIi1;7• M �r =$-� �17Pt Corti;ied Fee ; �[ e - t�`• Postmark C3 Return Receipt Fsu �Q` E Here C3m (6idnrseeni Requirotl) [JJ Im Radiated DellWery F& -a I] (ErWor%irurl RNUirad) Ln r -q Tocalpostage & Fees fL J�h -p Jeh! Ta 1 LU l � -- - - �......_ — Shifa zf. FEW GtHTIF#ED MAILr RECEIP . (AomESUO Mad Qnly, mo fRsurance Cauera r,r, J Q 1 Dr Postage Certified Fee ��� + RMum Rltcapt Fee `^� ' Postmark � ED (Endcrsumant Auqu;rgdf Here Reslricted Olivary Fee O (E,Trfersemeni Requirad= rs) w � Total Postage & Fees 60 fel -p 3em1 To I� or POE -- - G'1fy,Sra"E,<ri}T3 1�[J {,s4 � �- ].J l.a"' • - ._......---... As to 1 above: I am concerned that the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department's unilateral decision as to the timing of the installation of the signal seems to have been made in complete disregard as to the desires of the City's Staff, concerned residents, the Planning Commission and the Little Rock School District. There is no doubt, that in some communities the school would be built without a signal, only to have the patrons and community descend upon the Highway Commission to build a signal on the State Highway at the Highway Department's expense with only a small portion of the cost at the expense of the local community. If the Planning Commission consents to the proposed modification of the Conditional Use Permit, the residents of the city will not have a signal at this location until the school opens, or heaven forbid, until after there is another serious accident at this intersection that could have been prevented with a traffic signal. I ask that the Planning Commission deny this request and leave prior installation of the signal as a condition of the CUP. Surely, when faced with the reality that their denial of a traffic signal to promote the safe construction of the school, will prevent the construction of the school, the Highway Department will set aside their normal procedures and protocol to accede to the desires of the local community. To my knowledge, neither the Mayor nor any officials from LRSD have lobbied the AHTD for this approval and perhaps that is what is required. As to 2 above: During the course of our work to design the north leg of this intersection in the past weeks it has also come to my attention that the street improvements planed by the School District do not comply with the current Master Street Plan primarily to accommodate the eventual connection to LaMarche. The current CUP provides for one lane of traffic in each direction with a center turn lane on West Taylor Loop. The current Master Street Plan calls for two lanes of traffic in each direction for that section of West Taylor Loop adjacent to the School. I was unaware, as I am sure was the Planning Commission, and the citizens of Little Rock at large, that a variance from the Master Street Plan was included in the earlier CUP. The reduction from the standard should only be allowed if one lane in each direction is adequate for full development in the area, including; 1. The area north of Cantrell Road 2. Areas adjacent to West Taylor Loop south of Cantrell Road 3. The future connection of LaMarche to Taylor Loop Road as per the MSP 4. Traffic associated with the new School 5. Traffic attracted to the signalized intersection and general growth of traffic on Cantrell Road I also understand that the proposed improvements do not contemplate dual left turn lanes from Cantrell Road onto West Taylor Loop or two southbound lanes on the south side of the intersection to accommodate the dual left turns. Again, I have no objection provided the intersection, without costly modification in the future, can accommodate the future growth detailed above and that the cost of any such modification will not fall upon the ownership on the north side of Cantrell. Peters & Associates have prepared an expanded traffic study of the intersection of Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop at my behest. Based upon development of the parcel west of my residence as Office, Peter's study shows that no additional improvements are required on Cantrell Road or on the south side of the intersection. Public Works does not concur with Peters & Associates, and is thus far insisting that additional improvements to Cantrell Road and West Taylor Loop, south of Cantrell will be required. At this point it appears that Public Works is insisting on the future improvements not because they are necessary for the intersection to function, but rather because they are required by the Master Street Plan. If that is the case, these improvements should be constructed now, by the immediate developer (LRSD) as a boundary street improvement as any other developer would be required to do. I have a keen interest in this area. It does not take a great deal of time studying the Master Street Plan to realize that my home for the last 44 years is in the northeast corner of what will surely be referred to, in a short number of years, as at the "Intersection of Cantrell Road and LaMarche" just across from the school. I know from multiple experiences that 911 responders are baffled by the existence of two intersection named "Cantrell and Taylor Loop". NOW is the time for this leg to be renamed LaMarche before the school opens. It is my hope that we can meet with Pubic Works prior to the Planning Commission meeting this Thursday and resolve the issues as they relate to future improvements to the intersection and the issues I raised last summer as to the alignment. In closing I would like to reiterate that I am in complete support of the School District in their efforts to construct this school. My position on the two items I have noted has however, been consistent and clearly stated since July of 2007. Best regards, J :� � 1 0 The Mehlburger Firm Engir•aaes Lana;. ape Architects o Surveyors Ul'Tes Lowder, P. E. N-sident 6c7 4560- 501/375-5331 360.501/375-5331 / Fax 501/375-7452 / Nt•)We ;' T prr;i,icns�"neltilburger.corn 201 South Izard o F. O. Box 3837 c Little Rock, AR 72203-3837 Little Rock School District H.W. Good ,Jr., P. E. ,leis ngineer Phone (501 ) 447444a - Fax (501) 4.47-1161 E -Mail: 6ill.Goodman O iCsd.orc� 810 W. Markham o Little Rock, AR 72201 oou ca N -0 a Q O r n CL D W to -� T CL Z � m O n O W Z O M [n Z i 40 0 Z W17 D +...; ;..:. v, -;•- rn � N m V �tl m p w c 63 CA) \ < O O O (D -+, r- C��t� fir* °' z z in O m v s -< N Q° ^ �3 y 0 a CD PRESORTED CD ?o zH rl -Jl O FIRST CLASS (D wmc -0 rzz Qa bi CL 1 omo t< >� 'UM d3 ib o Fl m Z 0 CDU 0 U;u vl M Ed +,5 C' 'r lYil > S 13 0 PN9 0 m X m r r - m z m Hasler olx-rl 0000 OZD r ®u Doz ;9 in -Ax r-1 Zv -i M 3 -i p X = -i (n -9 -11 0 i_: I W 0 vi f+ - M w -6 to Ziv 0H er$ � 3 0 0 orm Cn c o 0707 m u,; m to -�1 C7 3 Om CL m r_ a z r m n m O - N 9 O W Z C.) 3) Z v O N Z J A w -4 a o. �3 v CA cn < N r N O o CA)m G P PRESORTED FIRST CLASS nouposGiy c sus t — ea ea YO 0 ® C. r� o NC:) {� s c? 0D� it 121 �9 €� c z o zzim 4':'i D o - -IS W C 0 r0v f3 -41-4 O O Z >F Ti � de7 o olm a ;Uluz (A c'mu O 0 I a'? CA c O m a> > D to m co OT 'a m r z -a m n O OrC N D 09 m fv Z W � m Z O Z p x ar Z CA Co� o m K'CD m r a a O j m A z z r' HI old � a; N CD HI x 0 co CD PRESORTED FIRST LR LA O sz ate, �1 N a) Cl co 0 q v rD co It, cn q 0 ril 0 0 rn — c: -M 0 ZHITI -: 0 D<-% 0 b mmC 0 49 I-XIM to t" D Z 0,10 ;rTIDO - F� O:AM �0X1z t" cDlu to ]DOM i zuz o ax 0 Ii0 Ed t3 0 m h� 0 PL0 EIb W 0 Ari w N -0 C C7 c O w m t? 7 g to m O tn; m to -4 '" CL ic r Z -a m n o O ra 9 Z ca v O �p Z -ap LI 4Z,1p n c`a v y y to < ,-4" r N o O J V CA) rn� I PRESORTED FIRST CLASS nzopost�x .� In cn l:n 1Z con •. Cr CD n N 0 CVCr CU CD a > co y en W M. CD 0 +m tj N� CD SLCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-132 Subdivision (501) 371-4790 Ta ❑ Not Deliverable As Addressee: Unable To Forward ❑ Insufficient Address ❑ Moved. Left No .� actress ❑ VnrF.lir>t--3 ❑ f7riti ;dd Zr- tiln 13U,11 ;r F= -,mtrer ❑ Vacant ❑ O No Mail Receptacle ❑ F3ox Closed -No 0,01 ❑ Returned F[' Fef!?, ',r cess Ll OCCUPANT Z -5646-A 5 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK, AR 2Z21� .fA f � t 947-182 GAI122 G $00.410 t:n,fed From 72201 I.9S POSTAGE n W> d "'? "d n a > y i SLCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-132 Subdivision (501) 371-4790 Ta ❑ Not Deliverable As Addressee: Unable To Forward ❑ Insufficient Address ❑ Moved. Left No .� actress ❑ VnrF.lir>t--3 ❑ f7riti ;dd Zr- tiln 13U,11 ;r F= -,mtrer ❑ Vacant ❑ O No Mail Receptacle ❑ F3ox Closed -No 0,01 ❑ Returned F[' Fef!?, ',r cess Ll OCCUPANT Z -5646-A 5 WILLOW CV LITTLE ROCK, AR 2Z21� .fA f � t 947-182 GAI122 G $00.410 t:n,fed From 72201 I.9S POSTAGE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for develo mens of a new school campus. Z -5646-A - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hata, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS:_ Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District - THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is request d for deveto ment of a new school campus. (Z -5646-A)_ _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest comer of (:antrell and Ta for Loo Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for development of a new school campus. —Z-5646-A)— NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest cornoop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for development of a new school campus. Z -5646-A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Tavlor Loop Roads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for development of a new school campus. Z -5646-A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Tavlor Loop Roads__.. _ _ OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is requested for development of a new school campus. Z -5646-A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor LoopRoads OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is re uested for devela rnent of anew school cam us. Z -5646-A -- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor.. City Hall, on July 19. 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Southwest corner of Cantrell and Taylor Loop Roads -- OWNED OWNED BY: Little Rock School District THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: A Conditional Use Permit is re uested for development of a new school campus Z -5646-A) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on July 19, 2007 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. 4° 3 z ,d an w ° �o� ° a O o 7r Ri O cd N .[ m o U to � U o M c opoo� Q cn t+, o cl, 'rs m_ W 66 cd Z 0 -+S O t, O pG b JU ° C7 4�3 4+ o cd -mood +8 c