05-01-01S'81
Minutes
Board of Directors Room
City Hall — 500 W. Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas
May 1, 2001
6:OOP.M
The Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock, February 20, 2001, regular meeting, with
Mayor Dailey presiding. City Clerk Nancy Wood called the roll with the following Directors
present: Directors: Pugh, Hinton, Lichty, Cazort, Keck, Stewart, Wyrick, Graves, Adcock
and Kumpuris. Ten (10) present. The invocation was given by Director Kumpuris, followed
by the Pledge of Allegiance.
The meeting was recorded as follows:
Item 2. Resolution to authorize the City manager to enter into a contract for Vision Little
Rock Facilitation Service was deferred. City Manager Cy Carney stated there were only two
responses and they would defer for two weeks to try and get more response. Director
Adcock made the motion to defer Item 2, with Vice Mayor Cazort seconding the motion. By
unanimous voice vote of the board members present the item was deferred.
Director Keck presented Mr. Bryan Day, Little Rock Parks and Recreation Director
an award, for the City's Urban Forestry Initiative, administered by the Little Rock Parks and
Recreation Department.
Mr. Gene Pfeiffer made a presentation of a check in the amount of $999.99 to the
Parks Department of the City of Little Rock; given in honor of their customers and
teammates of Source One Company, in saying thanks to the City and it's citizens for the
support they have had for ninety nine years; to assist in the effort of completing the
Millennium Trail. Mr. Pfeiffer stated they would make a similar presentation to the City of
North Little Rock at their next Board meeting.
An overview and update was presented on Vision Little Rock, by Chairs of Vision
Little Rock, Virgil Miller and Bob East outlining what has been accomplished, the direction
they team is going, and the results they expect to achieve. Schedules of their meetings were
handed out to board members.
The Consent Agenda was the next consideration.
1. MOTION - To approve minutes of the Board of Directors regular meeting: April 3,
2001.
2. RESOLUTION NO. - Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract for Vision
Little Rock facilitation services. (Item Deferred)
3. RESOLUTION NO. 11,052 - Approving Appointment of Replacement Commissioner to
Board of Improvement of Water and Sewer Improvements District No. 141 of Little
Rock, Arkansas.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 11,053 - Authorizing the City Manager to enter into contract
negotiations for the provision of 2001 Summer Youth Recreation and Employment
Programs in Little Rock.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 11,054 - Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with
All Service Electric in the amount of $76,199 for Cantrell Road Pedestrian Signal, a 2000
enhancement project.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 11,055 - To authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with
Kenneth Goss as part of the Central High Targeted Neighborhood Enhancement Plan
7. RESOLUTION NO. 11,056 - Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with
Township Builders in the amount of $147,793 for South Country Club Blvd Drainage
Improvements, a 1998 Revenue Bond project.
Director Adcock asked for a staff presentation on Item 4. Barbara Osborne stated they
received 32 bids; there were 15 that were either disqualified or did not meet the review
process for various reasons. She stated there was 17 bidders who were determined the lowest
responsible bids. Ms. Osborn stated the resolution listed the applicants the review committee
recommends for contracts. She said the review committee also recommended that the dollars
remaining, the city would issue a re -bid to allow those programs that did not pass the review,
or were disqualified, another opportunity to apply. Director Adcock asked Ms. Osborne to
read the applicants receiving the contracts, and the amounts received. Ms. Osborne read the
list of seventeen. (See Resolution 11,056).
The consent agenda was read. Director Keck motioned to approve the Consent Agenda, Vice
Mayor Cazort seconded the motion, and by unanimous voice vote of the board members
present, the consent agenda was adopted.
Citizens Communication was presented next on the agenda. There were no speakers
presented.
The Grouped Items: 8, 9,10, and 11, were read the first time. (Item 11, the Public Hearing
was opened, and closed, there were no speakers in favor or opposed to the item.
8. ORDINANCE NO. 18,470 - Amending Chapter 31 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Little Rock, Arkansas, providing for a deferral of Boundary Street Improvements for Jay
Smith Addition located on the north side of Cantrell Road and East of Keightly Drive.
9. ORDINANCE NO. 18,471 - To request a waiver of the landscaping requirements for the
west side of the WCF to be located at 809 S. Bowman Road.
10. ORDINANCE NO. 18,472 - Reclassifying property located along the Asher Corridor,
located in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, amending the official zoning map of the City of
Little Rock, Arkansas; and for other purposes.
11. ORDINANCE NO. 18,473 & PUBLIC HEARING - To vacate and abandon the south
portion of South Katilius Street, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. (Deferredfrom
April 3, 2001)
The Ordinances were read the first time. The rules were suspended to provide for the second
and third readings of the Ordinances by unanimous vote of the Board members present, and
by unanimous voice vote the ordinances were adopted.
13. ORDINANCE Approving a planning boundary of three (3) miles from the Little Rock
City Limits, Repealing Ordinance No. 15,543 and other issues. (Item deferred for two
weeks) Mr. Jim Lawson, Director of Planning and Development, gave a brief overview and
presentation, saying that at the last Board of Directors Meeting, two Ordinances were
presented, one was to set the three mile planning jurisdiction line, which he explained is the
item before the board tonight, and the other was to begin to zone the area. He said this was
the request that was pulled down at the last meeting. He said they would spend
approximately nine months to a year in the area talking to property owners before any zoning
would be done. He said tonight's issue is the three -mile planning jurisdiction. He said that
line has been set up in Little Rock since 1957. He stated. that State law allows Little Rock to
have five -mile jurisdiction, but since the city has extraterritorial zoning for three miles, it
makes more sense to have only one line, and that is a three mile jurisdiction line. He
explained that they had not gone out and visited with everyone on whether to establish this
jurisdiction line. He said the intent was to establish the line, and then begin to develop a land
use plan and then come back to the board with a zoning plan, which is what has been done in
other parts of Little Rock. Mr. Lawson stated that one of the main concerns that had been
expressed to him as far as opposition was that there was no representation on the Planning
Commission for the extraterritorial areas. He stated that according to what he had learned
from Mr. Carpenter, the City Attorney, was that the City Manager form of government, under
state law, did not allow anyone to serve on a city board or commission who lives outside the
city limits. Mr. Lawson asked to move forward with this issue and that he would work with
Pastor Weaver and others who are working on a study with the state legislature, and would
like to work to get the law changed so that these areas could be represented on the Planning
Commission. Director Lichty stated he thought the first step would be to repeal the existing
ordinance since it is not legal under state law, and get the City Attorney to provide an
ordinance that would pass muster. Director Cazort stated he thought at this point, there could
not be an ordinance that would pass muster because of the state law, and that this should be
item number one on the 2001 legislative package. Director Pugh asked what happens when
the city gets the three -mile jurisdiction. Mr. Lawson stated that the authority is limited. He
said if for example someone owns property and wants to subdivide and make it less than a
five -acre tract, and begins to sell off lots, they would have to file a plat with Planning and
Development. He said a plat has to be filed with Pulaski County now, but they would have
to file with the City. He said in terms of the use, regarding the item on the agenda tonight,
the city has no control over the use. He said they could put a business, a house, or whatever,
and as long as the area is 5.1 acres, the city has no control at all. It is only when the owner
begins to subdivide that they would be required to file a plat. Director Lichty asked if there
were not a way to have anon - voting member, and create some sort of ordinance in the interim
to allow that. Mr. Tom Carpenter, City Attorney replied that was allowable. He stated that
2
what the general statute says is that the board cannot appoint somebody to serve on a board
or commission who is not a qualified elector of the city. He said there is an express
exception to that statute for museum boards. He stated that it was originally the Art Center
only, and it was then expanded to museum boards to deal with the Museum of Discovery.
He said the non - voting member could not vote. The person(s) would be an advisory member,
and the person could not go into any executive session. He stated that there could be one or
more advisory personnel who wished to serve. Mayor Dailey suggested the item be held on
first reading, and come back with a draft of a proposed ordinance that could give the non-
voting membership as a consideration before moving forward beyond this point. Mr. Weaver
that this ordinance would give the city jurisdiction, and the city could move in with planning,
and all those things. The ordinance tonight, if approved would give it the strength of law.
Mr. Weaver stated he had not talked to any property owners that knew about the three -mile
extension. He said they do not know what is happening to them, they don't know they are
about to come under the jurisdiction of the City of Little Rock. He said not one property
owner he had talked who knew this. He said two weeks ago this ordinance was deferred
indefinitely. He said it turns out that indefinite is two weeks. He wanted to know why, two
weeks. He said he informed the board at the last meeting that the Legislature had ordered an
interim study to resolve the issues of extraterritorial jurisdiction, and the lack of
representation for the property owners within this jurisdiction, is disappointed in those
responsible for putting this item back on the agenda this soon. He said he and others were
under the impression, from the remarks of Jim Lawson, in the last meeting, that there would
be public meetings and so forth out in this area before this item would be brought back. That
was their understanding. He said he felt betrayed. He quoted Arkansas Code 14 -56 -413.
"The Planning Commissions shall designate the area within the territorial jurisdiction, for
which it will prepare, plans, ordinances and regulations." 13e said paragraph two of the same
code, stated, "The description of the boundaries should be fled with the City Clerk and the
County Recorder." He said he asked if that had been done, and was informed by the City
Clerk, that as of today, it had not been done. He said that would seem to him to be the
natural progression, even before the plans and ordinances that will be prepared, and passed,
and the regulations that will be put upon these property owners, that there must be a fling of
those boundaries with the City Clerk, and the County Recorder as well. Mr. Carpenter stated
that his understanding of this resolution is that the reason this resolution is being adopted is
so the Planning Commission can go forward, to find the boundaries, prepare the maps, and
then file them, before they actually take the next step 'to try to attempt extra - territorial
jurisdiction. Mr. Weaver said the resolution expressed that intent, no ordinance has been
passed, and the boundaries have been mapped. Mr. Lawson stated the plans and maps have
not been filed because the ordinance has not been approved. Mr. Lawson stated that what
they were trying to do tonight is to establish a planning jurisdiction. That would put the city
` in the planning business, and they would prepare the land use plans on the ordinances to
come back and do zoning. That is how it has been in the past. If the board wanted to, it
could all be done in nine months, but what happens is the Planning Department is out there
trying to plan and do some things, and they don't even have jurisdiction to do it. He said
they have encountered this before, where people will say, your board is not even supporting
this, why are you out here, and that is the problem. Director Lichty asked, then, why would
the board want to defer the item beyond tonight, if it is something that allows you to do under
current state law, and there is no linkage between it and the ordinance the City Attorney has
been asked to prepare allowing a non - voting membership, outside the city limits. Mayor
Dailey asked Mr. Lawson at the previous meeting what was deferred at that time. Mr.
Lawson said they took off the intent to zone. Mr. Weaver said they have concerns about
representation, and have expressed that to the State legislature, and they have said they would
do an interim study. The city, county, local affairs, and joint committees would do this board
study from the house and senate. The county planning officials should be involved; the city,
and interested parties need to sit down. He said the property owners did not want the city out
there now. He said they did not want the city's jurisdiction vote them now, they had no voice
and didn't want the city out there until they could get a voice, elected or appointed by the
property owners, or their elected officials. He said he had nothing against this board, but that
he and the others could not vote for them. Director Kumpuris asked Mr. Carpenter why this
law (territorial jurisdiction) was set up. Mr. Carpenter answered that his understanding was
that cities were in a position where things were happening outside their borders which
represented a natural progression of the city, so they would take in a number of reasons that
did not have appropriate infrastructure or zoning or other types of classifications, and one of
two things would happen, they would either be some mayor infrastructure impacts upon the
community when they were annexed in, or, the areas would not be annexed because of the
problems that occurred in the external areas. This was an effort to try to make sure you could
see the natural growth pattern for an area and try to make them compatible. Director
Kumpuris stated that his understanding was that what Mr. Weaver is asking is to give the
property owners nine months to a year to go out meet with people, talk with people, get their
thoughts on what is going on, and then come back at the end of that time, and nothing that is
done during that period of time, has any biding power until the Planning Commissions hears
the issue again, or the board gets it back, and then the final recommendation based on all that
input is presented. Mr. Lawson stated that was not correct, but was close. He stated that
what they were asking the board to do, tonight, is to establish subdivision jurisdiction, which
3
U/
does give the city authority if someone subdivided a less than five -acre tract. The country
presently has that authority, and the city has it in some areas also. He said the city could
have control over that, but what they are also asking is that they could go out, for nine or ten
months and work to develop a land use plan, an extraterritorial zoning as has always been
done in other areas, and come back to the board with a plan that would establish the land use
plan, and establish zoning jurisdiction. He said in Planning's mind there is a huge difference
between zoning jurisdiction and subdivision jurisdiction. He said zoning jurisdiction doesn't
control the use of the land, and even state law allows five full miles, which the city does not
exercise, so if the board wants them do the pre - planning with no authority at all, then this
ordinance doesn't need to be approved. He said you could do it all at one time, and they
would just need a mandate from the board that they have some control over subdivision. He
said they have gone out in areas that are now inside the city limits that ten or fifteen years
ago were not, and they went out and explained there were no building permits required, there
was no dog lease laws, etc., and people did not object to it. He said it is a two -step process.
He said it is up to the board to decide what they wanted planning to do at this point. He said
normally this boundary line that is being discussed tonight, they normally don't ask anyone
in the area if they want it, it's the city's right under state law. to properly plan for the areas
outside the city so that the citizens who live in the city don't have huge infrastructure bills.
He said they have never asked before, they have just gone to the areas. Director Kumpuris
stated then, it is this board fiduciary responsibility to make sure these areas, if and when they
are brought into the city is not at a financial burden to the present citizens. Mr. Lawson said
yes, that was 100% correct. Director Wyrick stated she had spoken to Pastor Weaver and
others, and one of their concerns is the mandate to dedicate right of way, and the other is in
lieu money to develop half street improvements, and the other thing is the lack of ability to
split up land between family members. Mr. Lawson replied that those issues had been dealt
with before, in the last few years. He said they have waived street improvements and some
other things for someone who just wanted to split up land for their kids, etc. He said they
tied some things into it so that the property could not be rented out, or sold off to anyone
else.
The ordinance was read the first time. Director Lichty made a motion, with Director Cazort
seconding the motion to provide for the second reading of the Ordinance. Mayor Dailey
asked for a voice vote. Directors Wyrick, Adcock, and Mayor Dailey voted no, Directors
Pugh, Hinton, Lichty, Cazort, Keck, Kumpuris, Stewart, and Graves voted yes. The
ordinance was held on first reading.
14. ORDINANCE - To abolish the City Beautiful Commission and to abolish the Arts
and Humanities Promotion Commission; to establish a new commission entitled "The
Natural and Cultural Resource Commission "; to assign administrative responsibility and
certain authority of the abolished commissions to the new commission; and for other
purposes.
15. ORDINANCE - Amending Little Rock Ordinance No. 18,359 (September 26, 2000) to
transfer the duties of the former City Beautiful Commission regarding appeals and
variances of landscape requirements to the Little Rock Planning Commission; delegating
authority and responsibility to the Planning Commission; and for other purposes. (Item
withdrawn by City Manager.)
Mr. Carney, City Manager, overviewed the topic, stating that about three years ago the city
board directed the City Manager and staff to examine the various city boards and
commissions, and to determine if there was an opportunity for consolidation or abolition of
any of the boards, in order to make organization more efficient. He said the board has taken
action to do that on a number of cases. He stated that the City did in fact act to terminate and
end the duties of City Safety Commission, the Community Policing Advisory Board, and
consolidated a number of the Mechanical Plumbing Electrical Advisory Boards into a single
advisory board. He stated this item on the agenda tonight is one that has been talked about
for a couple of years in working with the Parks Department, Planning Department, and
others, and recommend this to the board. He said the action of the board would establish a
consolidation of the activities of the two groups. Mr. Carney asked Mr. Bryan Day to give an
overview of the specific work related to this consolidation. Mr. Day asked the board to
support the consolidation, and create a new commission. Mr. Day said the process has been
difficult and had learned a couple of things; one that change is inevitable, and the second,
that people are going to resist change. He said he believed if there was no change, he
believed it would be setting the stage for failure to meet the changing demands in our
community. Mr. Day thanked both commissions for doing great things they had been doing
for a number of years. He said it is now time to change and look for new opportunities. He
cited that during the Future Little Rock Process, in 1992 there was a recommendation to
create a community appearance board. He said the recommendation was never adhered to,
however felt this was a great opportunity to take what the citizens wanted in 1992, modified
a little to create a new commission known as the Natural and Cultural Resources
Commission. He said in general what they would do is promote the enhancement of the
&,I,-
natural and cultural resources of our community, advocate new ideas and pursue new
ventures, recommend policies that might affect these areas, to the Board of Directors. He
said they had met with both commissions, and after lengthy discussions, the Arts and
Humanities Commission unanimously endorsed the concept. He said after the same
discussions the City Beautiful Commission endorsed the concept, however they had a couple
of caveats that they wanted considered. Some of the conditions called for the creation of an
additional review board to study and approve landscape variances under the recently
approved Landscape Alteration Ordinance. They asked about putting a budget appropriation
into the enabling ordinance, and to look at appointing the existing members of both
commissions to this new commission. He said they took the recommendations and began
meeting with other members of city staff, and after discussions felt those were not
recommendations they in good conscience make to the board. Mr. Day stated there are a few
members of the City Beautiful Commission that have objections, and they would be speaking
later. He said their primary concern was in regards to the review of the landscape ordinance.
Mr. Day said they believe the Planning Commission is capable of reviewing the ordinance
and encouraged the board to adopt the ordinance. There was some discussion regarding the
review process of variances. Director Kumpuris asked why legislation is now coming up,
months after the ordinance passed, and change an agreement that two opposing factions came
to agree on. Mr. Day answered that they started the process before the landscape variance
issues came up. He said this was Little Rock Parks and Recreations recommendation, his
recommendation. He said he personally believed and his staff believed, and other city staff
believes the planning Commission is capable of reviewing the ordinances, and if the
commissions are merged, it did not make sense to them to create a second commission. He
said if that proves to be the case, he felt they would leave things alone as they are now,
transfer the administrative duties of the City Beautiful Commission to the Planning
Department, where they belong as a regulatory agency, and they would get back with Arts
and humanities and let them reconstitute themselves to address these new issues. Director
Kumpuris stated what this is doing is undoing a compromise that was reached by two
different groups and he had a hard time not figuring out someway to work this out. Mr. Day
said for selfish reasons, Little Rock Parks did not want to be in the regulatory business, and if
they are staffing these groups, as they are now, and the regulatory function stays there, then it
would be counter productive for Parks. He said he feels it belongs with the Planning
Department where they know these issues, where they work with the planning commission
and other staff. Mr. Bob Cowan, Chairman of the City Beautiful Commission, stated he
didn't want all the work that went into the landscaping ordinance to be undone, and it was
agreed to by all parties. He stated that whatever happens he would like to have citizen
involvement, and not lose the strength of the ordinance that was recently passed. He said he
was concerned that if the regulatory function went to planning many items may end up on the
consent agenda, and not looked at as closely. Mr. Troy Lahay, Vice president of Southwest
Little Rock United for Progress, and a member of the City Beautiful Commission, stated they
had discussed this issue quite a bit and felt the commissions should be left as they are. Mr.
Mark Johnson, stated he was speaking in favor of maintaining the responsibility of
reviewing variances in the landscaping and possible the tree ordinances with the City
Beautiful Commission or its successor agency or some sub committee of that agency. Ms.
Ruth Bell, Pulaski County League of Women Voters, said they have concern about the
change for several reasons. She said first, the City Beautiful Commission has been in
existence for a good time, and has functioned admirably and has great background on the
whole subject and also active and a part of the landscape and tree ordinances. She stated City
Beautiful also has great commitment to the responsibility, and familiarity. Mr. Hugh
Earnest, said change is not always good. He said the issue to him has policy implications.
He said there is no doubt that the Planning Commission could do this, the staff could review,
but felt the proposal from the City Beautiful is a continuation of the review process in place
for many years. He asked for the board to consider the creation of a review board that could
act on certain specific ordinances, in this case the landscape ordinance. Director Graves
asked Mr. Bryan Day if under his proposal, if an applicant: wished to apply for a variance,
would it go directly to the Planning Commission and then come to the Board of Directors.
Mr. Day answered that the Planning Commission would be the entity to make the decision.
Mr. Tim Heiple, City Beautiful Commission member, stated that they do endorse merging
the two commissions into one, but would hope their recommendations could be implemented.
Ms. Dottie Funk, Chairperson of the City Beautiful Commission, and was involved in the
land Alteration Task Force, and stated the City Beautiful Commission was not afraid of
change. She said they have new members that want to do things, but as a commission they
_ are not sure of the direction. She said they would like some kind of resolve on this issue.
She stated that while they were working on the Tree Ordinance, she would go to the Planning
Commission representing the City Beautiful Commission, arid would try to lift the awareness
of the people there that there were people who are concerned about what was happening in
the City. She said she would have to get the agenda for the Planning Commission, find out
who was applying for a variance and it took a lot of homework, and then go and speak at that
meeting, every other week, and ask the applicants, "Are you going to cut down all the trees ?"
"Are you going to bull doze the hill ?" She stated that if this is given to the Planning
Commission again, someone is going to have to do the "homework ", and come to the
meeting, without authority, as she had as the City Beautiful Representative, as they were
entrusted with the idea of lifting the level of awareness and expectation for the community.
She stated that was what would be lost. Director Kumpuris made a motion to table the issue
for two weeks. Director Adcock seconded the motion. By majority voice vote, the motion
was approved. Mr. Cy Carney, City Manager, stated that based on the discussion tonight,
that what he was proposing is an extraordinary request since the Manager's office is the
applicant related to proposing these two ordinances, he requested that since the motion had
tabled the items for two weeks, at that time he would like to withdraw the items, leave the
two commissions as is, unchanged, and would move quickly, by tomorrow, to
administratively shift the responsibilities of those commissions, in terms of staffing. Director
Keck made a motion to expunge the vote to table. Director Hinton seconded the motion, and
by unanimous voice vote of the board members present, the motion to table was expunged.
Director Kumpuris withdrew the motion. Director Lichty made the motion to accept
withdrawal of items 14 and 15, Director Stewart seconded the motion. With a unanimous
voice vote of members present, the motion was approved.
19. RESOLUTION NO. 11,057 - To make appointments to various Boards and
Commissions.
20. RESOLUTION NO. 11,058 - To make appointments to Vision Little Rock.
The meeting was recessed by motion at 8:30 PM to go into executive sessions to make
various board and Vision Little Rock appointments. The board reconvened at 8:45. The City
Manager read the list of recommended appointments: The Construction Inspection Board,
Mr. Joe Hilliard and Mr. Clyde Smith; for the Vision Little Rock Racial Cultural Diversity
Work Group, Ms. Ruth Sheppard as the Co -Chair of the group, and Mr. Leon Adams to
the five- member Executive Committee, the Racial and Cultural Diversity Commission, Mr.
Claude Wheeler, to represent Ward 7, the Community Housing Advisory Board, Mr. Steve
Bradley. Director Adcock made the motion to approve the recommendations, with Vice
Mayor Cazort seconding the motion. With a unanimous 'voice vote of the board members
present, the recommendations were approved.
Items 16 and 17 (Ordinances) were read the first time. The rules were suspended to
provide for the second and third readings of the Ordinance by unanimous vote of the Board
members present, being ten in number and two - thirds or more of the members of the Board
of Directors. By a unanimous voice vote of the board members present, the ordinances
were approved. The emergency clause in item 16 was approved.
16. ORDINANCE NO. 18,478 - Amending Chapter 8 of the Little Rock Code of
Ordinances, creating new provisions for the issuance of building permits for residences as
defined herein, declaring an emergency, and for other purposes.
17. ORDINANCE NO. 18,479 - Appropriating funds to provide city match of $105,000 for
a downtown signal system upgrade.
12. ORDINANCE NO. 18,474 - To amend Ordinance No. 18,409 ( "The 2001 Budget
Ordinance ") to appropriate and reallocate funds; and for other purposes. (Deferred from
April 17, 2001). Mr. Carney, stated that the board had received a "hard copy" memo of more
information about the budget amendment which was asked to be provided at the last meeting.
Mr. Carney overviewed the documents. The Ordinance was read the first time. The rules
were suspended to provide for the second and third readings of the Ordinance by unanimous
vote of the Board members present, being ten in number and two - thirds or more of the
members of the Board of Directors. By unanimous voice vote of the board members present,
the ordinance was adopted.
18. REPORT - City Manager's Activity Report. Mr. Carney announced the program to step
up the recycling program. Citizens would fill out a name identification slip, which would
make them to be eligible for drawings for prizes. The May workshop /field trip and event
calendar was presented to the board.
Vice Mayor Cazort made a motion to adjourn, Director Keck seconded the motion, and by
unanimous voice vote of board members present, the meeting; was adjourned at 8:55 PM.
ATTEST:
NANCY W OD, CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
JI AILEY, MAYOR
G
61?