Z-3862-B Staff AnalysisORDINANCE NO. 16,513
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDING FOR
THE MAINTENANCE OF A PRD DISTRICT ENTITLED
PARKWAY VILLAGE EXPANSION AMENDED LONG -FORM
PRD, LOCATED AT 14,300 CHENAL PARKWAY IN
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS■ AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 14,274 AND CHAPTER 36,
SECTION 36-176 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES. (Z -3862-B)
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 14,274 be amended to
provide for modification of District described as:
Parkway Village Long -Form PRD
SECTION 2. That the revised Site Development Plan and
plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning
Commission.
SECTION 3. That the maintenance of the zoning
classification, the revised plan for Parkway Village
Expansion Amended Long -Form PRD is conditioned upon
obtaining final plat approval within the time specified by
Article VII, Section (7), Chapter 36 of the Code of
ordinances.
SECTION 4. That the map referred to in Chapter 36-81.
and 36-82. of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little
Rock, Arkansas, and designated district map be and it is
hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary
to affect the designated change provided for in Section 1
hereof.
SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall take effect and
be in full force upon final approval of the plan by the
Planning Commission.
PASSED: k;ovenber 2, 1993
ATTEST:
Robbie Hancock
City Clerk
APPROVED:
Jim Dailew
Mayor
1. Meetina Date: November 2, 1993
2. Case No.: Z-3862-B
3. Request: Establishment of Parkway Village Expansion -
Amended Long-Form PRD
4. Location: 14,300 Chenal Parkway
5. Owner/ADDlicant: Baptist Medical System
6. Existing Status: Current zoning is PRD with proposed site
being undeveloped and heavily wooded.
7. Proposed Use: Construct residential care facility in area
set aside for future expansion in original PRD site plan.
8. Staff Recommendation: Approval
9. Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval
10. Conditions or Issues Remaining to be Resolved: None
11. Right-of-Way-Issues: None
12. Recommendation Forwarded With: A Planning Commission vote
of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent, 0 abstention, 1 open position.
13. Objectors: None
14. Neighborhood Plan: Chenal (19)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDING FOR
THE MAINTENANCE OF A PRD DISTRICT ENTITLED
PARKWAY VILLAGE EXPANSION AMENDED LONG -FORM
PRD, LOCATED AT 14,300 CHENAL PARKWAY IN
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 14,274 AND CHAPTER 36,
SECTION 36-176 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 14,274 be amended to
provide for modification of District described as:
Parkway Village Long -Form PRD
SECTION 2. That the revised Site Development Plan and
plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning
Commission.
SECTION 3. That the maintenance of the zoning
classification, the revised plan for Parkway Village
Expansion Amended Long -Form PRD is conditioned upon
obtaining final plat approval within the time specified by
Article VII, Section (7), Chapter 36 of the Code of
Ordinances.
SECTION 4. That the map referred to in Chapter 36-81.
and 36-82. of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little
Rock, Arkansas, and designated district map be and it is
hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary
to affect the designated change provided for in Section 1
hereof.
SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall take effect and
be in full force upon final approval of the plan by the
Planning Commission.
PASSED:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED:
Mayor
FILE NO.: Z -3862-B
NAME: PARKWAY VILLAGE EXPANSION - AMENDED LONG -FORM PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: The north side of Chenal Parkway, approximately
1/4 mile west of Pride Valley Road.
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Attn.: Mr. Bob Goza 401 Victory St.
9601 Interstate 630 Little Rock, AR 72201
Little Rock, AR 72205 374-1666
227-1744
AREA: 3 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 900
ZONING: PRD PROPOSED USES: Residential Care Facility
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REQUESTED: None
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes an amendment to their current Planned
Residential Development in order to construct a 48 -unit
residential care facility. Construction of the internal private
drives necessary for access to this new facility is proposed.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant requests approval of a revised site plan for
their PRD approved in 1982 in Ordinance 14,274. Proposed is
a 48 -unit residential care facility. Living units are
proposed to be 1 -bedroom and contain 440 square feet each.
The site for the residential care involves approximately 3
acres within the 82.48 acres site, and will involve the
construction of 900 feet of driveway. No variances are
requested.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is currently zoned PRD and a site plan was approved
in the establishment of the PRD. A revision to that
approved site plan is now proposed. The site for the
proposed construction is on an undeveloped portion of the
land immediately west of the existing nursing home.
C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Engineering Division indicates that they have no comments on
the proposal.
FILE NO.: Z -3862-B (Continued
Water Works reports that a main extension and on-site fire
protection will be required.
Wastewater Utility indicates that a sewer main extension
with easements will be required.
The Fire Department approved the plan without comment.
Site Plan Review indicates that a screening device will be
required along the north property line.
ARKLA and Southwestern Bell approved the plan without
comment.
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
The documents which have been submitted are deficient in the
following areas: 1) a statement is required describing
the character of the development and including the rationale
behind the assumptions and choices made; 2) the proposed
treatment of the perimeter of the property, including the
materials and techniques for screening, are required; 3) a
schematic landscaping plan is required; 4) an approved
screening device is required along the north property line;
5) the area under consideration in this application,
designating the portion of the site to be considered, is to
be designated; 6) the location of all easements is to be
shown; 7) a development schedule is to be provided; 8) the
names of all subdivisions abutting the site, including the
book and page number or instrument number, or the names of
owners of land which has not been subdivided, is to be shown
on the plat; 9) the physical description of all monuments
and the location of proposed PAGIS monuments is to be shown;
10) the zoning classifications of the site and of abutting
property is to be shown; 11) the engineering and surveying
certifications are to be included and executed; and, 12) a
preliminary bill of assurance is to be submitted.
E. ANALYSIS•
The proposal involves a relatively small portion of the site
occupied by Parkway Village, but an amendment to the
approved site plan for the PRD is necessary. The relatively
small area for the development of the residential care
facility should not affect the overall plan which was
approved for the PRD. The deficiencies noted are not
insurmountable, so there should be no delay imposed by not
being able to complete and amend submittals.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to making
the modifications to the documents noted.
K
FILE NO.: Z -3862-B (Continued)
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(September 16, 1993)
The project engineering firm was represented by Mr. Joe White.
Staff presented the request and Mr. White outlined the proposal.
The Committee discussed with Mr. White the deficiencies noted in
the discussion outline, and discussed the proposal. The item was
then forwarded to the Commission for the hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(OCTOBER 5, 1993)
The item was included on the Consent Agenda for approval, and the
recommendation to the Board of Directors for approval was passed
by the Planning Commission with the vote of 8 ayes, no nays,
2 absent, no abstentions, and 1 open position.
3
October' 5, 1993
ITEM FILE • Z- 2-B
NAME: PARKWAY VILLAGE EXPANSION - AMENDED LONG -FORM PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: The north side of Chenal Parkway, approximately
1/4 mile west of Pride Valley Road.
DEVELOPER: g1NGINEER:
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Attn.: Mr. Bob Goza 401 Victory St.
9601 Interstate 630 Little Rock, AR 72201
Little Rock, AR 72205 374-1666
227-1744
AREA: 3 ACRES N7NDER QF LOTS: 1 FT W TREET: 900
ZONING: PRD PRQPQSED USES: Residential Care Facility
P I G DT TRI T• 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES RE VESTED: None
STATEMENT QF PR P AL•
The applicant proposes an amendment to their current Planned
Residential Development in order to construct a 48 -unit
residential care facility. Construction of the internal private
drives necessary for access to this new facility is proposed.
A. PRO P AL RE E T:
The applicant requests approval of a revised site plan for
their PRD approved in 1982 in Ordinance 14,274. Proposed is
a 48 -unit residential care facility. Living units are
proposed to be 1 -bedroom and contain 440 square feet each.
The site for the residential care involves approximately 3
acres within the 82.48 acres site, and will involve the
construction of 900 feet of driveway. No variances are
requested.
B. EXISTING ITI
The site is currently zoned PRD and a site plan was approved
in the establishment of the PRD. A revision to that
approved site plan is now proposed. The site for the
proposed construction is on an undeveloped portion of the
land immediately west of the existing nursing home.
October' 5, 1993
SUBDIVISION
ITEM n in FILE Z -3862-
C.
- 2-
C. ENGINEERING NTILITY COMMENTS:
Engineering Division indicates that they have no comments on
the proposal.
Water Works reports that a main extension and on-site fire
protection will be required.
Wastewater Utility indicates that a sewer main extension
with easements will be required.
The Fire Department approved the plan without comment.
Site Plan Review indicates that a screening device will be
required along the north property line.
ARKLA and Southwestern Bell approved the plan without
comment.
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAW DESIGN:
The documents which have been submitted are deficient in the
following areas: 1) a statement is required describing
the character of the development and including the rationale
behind the assumptions and choices made; 2) the proposed
treatment of the perimeter of the property, including the
materials and techniques for screening, are required; 3) a
schematic landscaping plan is required; 4) an approved
screening device is required along the north property line;
5) the area under consideration in this application,
designating the portion of the site to be considered, is to
be designated; 6) the location of all easements is to be
shown; 7) a development schedule is to be provided; 8) the
names of all subdivisions abutting the site, including the
book and page number or instrument number, or the names of
owners of land which has not been subdivided, is to be shown
on the plat; 9) the physical description of all monuments
and the location of proposed PAGIS monuments is to be shown;
10) the zoning classifications of the site and of abutting
property is to be shown; 11) the engineering and surveying
certifications are to be included and executed; and, 12) a
preliminary bill of assurance is to be submitted.
I jM�_%!Nmff&-j
The proposal involves a relatively small portion of the site
occupied by Parkway village, but an amendment to the
approved site plan for the PRD is necessary. The relatively
small area for the development of the residential care
2
w
October' 5, 1993
SUBDIVzszON
ITEM (ContinFILE Z- 2-B
facility should not affect the overall plan which was
approved for the PRD. The deficiencies noted are not
insurmountable, so there should be no delay imposed by not
being able to complete and amend submittals.
F. STAFF RECOWENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to making
the modifications to the documents noted.
SUBDIVIa-ION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (September 16, 1993)
The project engineering firm was represented by Mr. Joe White.
Staff presented the request and Mr. white outlined the proposal.
The Committee discussed with Mr. White the deficiencies noted in
the discussion outline, and discussed the proposal. The item was
then forwarded to the Commission for the hearing.
3