Loading...
Z-3856 Staff AnalysisJuly 19, 1982 Item No. 4 - Z-3856 Owner: Steve Tegethoff Address: 514 East 9th Street Description: Long legal Zoned: "HR°' High Density Residential Variance Requested: Relief from bulk and area provisions of Section 43-36 to permit a 6' 10" rear yard for an addition. Present Use of Property: Multifamily Proposed Use of Property: Same expanded STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The applicant is renovating the existing apartment on this site and is requesting setback variances which will permit a. major addition to the existing carriage house. The addition onto the carriage house will permit its conversion into another apartment unit. There is no on-site parking for this property. The property shown immediately northeast of the apartment site is used for parking, as is the property which would tie these two parcels into an "L" shaped lot. Sole access to both these parking areas is from two drives which open onto 8th Street to the north and cross someone else's property. To our knowledge, there is no legal right of access to these properties. The structural relationships of all of the properties in this areas are very tight. It appears that it would be unwise to permit additional expansion of structures within this area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial. July 19, 1982 Item No. 4 - Continued BOARD ACTION: The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. The applicant stated that the property had been purchased 18 months previously and that the main structure had been converted from an 8 -unit boarding house to a 4 -unit apartment. He stated that the intention was to convert the carriage house into a fifth apartment unit. He stated that the carriage house has no plumbing at the present time and that the addition would be necessary in order to provide those facilities. He stated that the access drive to their parking area was owned by Quapaw Realty Company and that they have permission to use it for their access. After lengthy discussion, the Board moved to approve the application as filed with the condition that the applicant provide an adequate number of parking spaces for the five units proposed. The motion passed - 4 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent.