Loading...
Z-3777-A Staff AnalysisOctober 18, 1982 Item No. 1 - Z -3777-A Owner: Nancy Van Hoye - By: Tom Colford Address: 3623 Hill Road Description: N 1/2 Lot 10 and all of Lot 11, Block 5 Auten and Moss Addition Zoned: "R-5" Urban Residence Variance Requested: 1. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit less than 10' of separation between structures. 2. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit a 6' front yard for an accessory building. Present Use of Property: Multifamily Proposed Use of Property: Same STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In November 1981, the Board of Adjustment approved a 9' front yard setback for an attached garage on this property. Since then, other considerations have forced the applicant to consider building a detached garage. The ordinance requires in the "R-5" district that all structures meet the setbacks and detached structures be located at least 10' apart. This request is for a waiver of both requirements. Staff had recommended denial of the earlier variance and does not make a recommendation on this request. BOARD ACTION (9-20-82): The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a lengthy discussion, the Board moved to deny the application. That motion failed on a vote of 3 ayes, 2 noes and 2 absent. Then the Board made a motion to defer the item for one month so that the owner could provide additional information and justification for the variance requested. The motion passed: 5 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. October 18, 1982 Item No. 1 - Continued BOARD ACTION: The applicant was present and brought with him Tom Johnson, Architect, who showed a new site plan on this property attaching the carport to the house, which changed the variance issues in their entirety. The Board reviewed the site plan which showed the carport having a 16' front yard from Oak Street and having a 4.6' side yard on the south side next to the apartment project. After a lengthy discussion of the drawing and the issues at hand, the Board moved to approve a variance permitting a 15' front yard for the attached carport, and based their approval on Mr. Johnson's drawing and the discussion. The 4.6' side yard is not a factor. The setback will be 5' as required by ordinance. This modifies the variance of a 9' front yard which was granted in the November 1981 meeting. The motion passed: 6 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. October 180 1982 Item No. 1 - Z -3777-A Owner: Nancy Van Hoye - By: Address: 3623 Hill Road Tom Colford Description: N 1/2 Lot 10 and all of Lot 11, Block 5 Auten and Moss Addition Zoned: "R-5* Urban Residence Y Variance Requested: 1. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit less than 10' of separation between structures. 2. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit a 6' front yard for an accessory building. Present Use of Property: Multifamily Proposed Use of Property: Same STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In November 1981, the Board of Adjustment approved a 9' front yard setback for an attached garage on this property. Since then, other considerations have forced the applicant to consider building a detached garage. The ordinance requires in the "R-5" district that all structures meet the setbacks and detached structures be located at least 10' apart. This request is for a waiver of both requirements. Staff had recommended denial of the earlier variance and does not make a recommendation on this request. BOARD ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a lengthy discussion, the Board moved to deny the application. That motion failed on a vote of 3 ayes, 2 noes and 2 absent. Then the Board made a motion to defer the item for one month so that the owner could provide additional information and justification for the variance requested. The motion passed: 5 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. September 20, 1982 Item No. 8 - Z -3777-A Owner: Nancy Van Hoye - By: Tom Colford Address: 3623 Hill Road Description: N 1/2 Lot 10 and all of Lot 11, Block 5 Auten and Moss Addition Zoned: "R-5" Urban Residence Variance Requested: 1. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit less than 10' of separation between structures. 2. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit a 6' front yard for an accessory building. Present Use of Property: Multifamily Proposed Use of Property: Same STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In November 1981, the Board of Adjustment approved a 9' front yard setback for an attached garage on this property. Since then, other considerations have forced the applicant to consider building a detached garage. The ordinance requires in the "R-5" district that all structures meet the setbacks and detached structures be located at least 10' apart. This request is for a waiver of both requirements. Staff had recommended denial of the earlier variance and does not make a recommendation on this request. BOARD ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a lengthy discussion, the Board moved to deny the application. That motion failed on a vote of 3 ayes, 2 noes and 2 absent. Then the Board made a motion to defer the item for one month so that th. owner could provide additional information and justification for the variance requested. The motion passed: 5 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. September 20, 1982 Item No. 9 - Zoning Interpretation PROBLEM: Periodically, a contractor who has been working for the City of Little Rock or is performing construction which will result in public facilities such as water and sewer lines, streets and drainage, etc., works in an area which is some distance from his office or storage area. The City gets a request from such contractor for authorization to park his vehicles, equipment and materials on the site which is adjacent to the work area. The Zoning Ordinance plainly states that "Contractor Storage Yards" must be zoned for industrial uses. Obviously, this makes it impossible for a contractor to find a suitable location in all parts of the City. Since his uses are temporary in nature, it is not reasonable to seek zoning on a piece of property in such areas. Where the contractor must move his equipment back and forth each day to the jobsite, this cost must be included in the overall cost of the project. This ultimately can be expected to cost the taxpayers more for public improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Paragraph 1-c of Section 3-101-C of the Zoning Ordinance empowers the Planning Director to allow temporary buildings for commerce or industry for periods not to exceed one year. Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustment expand this paragraph to include temporary storage yards under the same criteria. BOARD ACTION: After a brief discussion, the Board moved to follow the staff recommendation, interpreting Paragraph 1-c of Section 3-11-C of the Ordinance -to include the temporary storage yards as outlined in the staff write-up above. The motion passed: 5 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. September 20, 1982 Item No. 8 - Z -3777-A Owner: Nancy Van Hoye - By: Tom Colford Address: 3623 Mill Road Description: N 1/2 Lot 10 and all of Lot 11, Block 5 Auten and Moss Addition Zoned: "R-5" Urban Residence Variance Requested: 1. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit _less than 10' of separation between structures. 2. Relief from Section 7-101.7D to permit a 6' front yard for an accessory building. Present Use of Property: Multifamily Proposed Use of Property: Same STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In November 1981, the Board of Adjustment approved a 9' front yard setback for an attached garage on this property. Since then, other considerations have forced the applicant to consider building a detached garage. The ordinance requires in the "R-5" district that all structures meet the setbacks and detached structures be located at least 10' apart. This request is for a waiver of both requirements. Staff had recommended denial of the earlier variance and does not make a recommendation on this request.