Loading...
boa_09 15 2022LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY OF MINUTES SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 4:00 P.M. I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being four (4) in number. II.Approval of the Minutes of the August 18, 2022 meeting of the Board of Adjustment' Members Present: Frank Allison -Chairman Austin Grinder -Vice Chair Richard Bertram Joe Justus Members Absent: Jeremiah Russell City Attorney Present: Sherri Latimer LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA PROCEDURE SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum II. Approval of the Minutes of the August 18, 2022 meeting of the Board of Adjustment III. Presentation of Consent Agenda IV. Presentation of Hearing Items LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ABBREVIATED AGENDA SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 4:00 P.M. I. OLD BUSINESS: No Old Business II. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Z-9709 2120 N. Garfield 2. Z-9710 5619 P Street 3. Z-9712 8312 Colonel Glenn Road 4. Z-9721 1920 Bragg Street SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 1 Z-9709 File No.: Z-9709 Owners: Lynda L Mace I Noel L Applicant: Jim Pace, Jim Pace Homes LLC. Address: 2120 N Garfield Legal Description: Lot 11, Block 2, of Altheimer an Addition to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas Zoned: R-2 Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance{s) Requested: A variance is requested from area regulations of Sec. 36-254 to allow a reduced front yard setback in the R-2 district. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated July 7, 2022. STAFF REPORT A.Planning and Development Civil Engineering Comments: No Comments. B.Buffering and Landscape Comments: In October 2020 the City adopted the "Heights Landscape Design Overlay District," requiring installation of one tree per 40 linear feet of street frontage within the Heights District Boundary, applicable to [among other types] residential construction in excess .of 600 square feet. C.Building Codes Comments: No Comments. D.Staff Analysis: The property at 2120 N Garfield is in a predominantly R-2 zoned neighborhood, within the Heights Landscape Design Overlay District. This district generally has no bearing on the subject variance requests. The subject property is located on the west side of N Garfield and south of Beacon St. The rear yard of the property is accessed from the alley connecting to Beacon Rd and Kavanaugh Blvd. The immediate neighboring properties are also populated with single family homes. 1 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T) Z-9709 The original small frame and masonry home that occupied this property has been razed and the applicant has constructed a new single-family home in its place. The front of the home faces N Garfield St with a proposed u-shaped drive and off-street parking. The applicant has stated that the due to the back to front fall of the lot and the rear sewer main location the foundation could not be set lower than originally planned. The raised foundation resulted in the front porch being higher than planned, requiring additional steps which will cross the 25-foot front building line. The new house and associated covered front porch will be built to the front 25-foot building setback line. The porch is approximately 2.5-feet above the adjacent front yard and will require 5-steps to return to grade. The applicants sketch indicates that the steps will be centered on the house and be 5-feet in width and extend 5-feet from the porch into the front yard setback. The last step will connect to a landing and extend an additional 5-feet to meet the proposed drive. Section 36-254(d)(1) states, "There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet." Therefore, the applicant requests a variance to allow a reduction of the required front yard setback to 20-feet to allow for steps to connect the drive to the front porch of their home. The survey and sketches provided by the applicant indicate that the front porch steps will cross the platted 25-foot front yard setback line 5-feet. The improvements will not be out of character with many of the other lots in this general area. There are numerous structures in this neighborhood which have steps extending into the front yard setbacks. In Staffs opinion, the existing conditions and the proposed addition will pose no negative effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the public, and will not detract from the value or aesthetic of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. Staff finds the request to generally be in conformance with the development pattern in the neighborhood. Based on the above assessment and analysis, Staff finds the requested variance to be reasonable. E. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested front yard setback reduction from 25- feet to a minimum of 20-feet as per the staff analysis and attached sketch / site plan, subject to the following. 1. A building permit being obtained for all construction. 2. Install trees, if deemed applicable at the time of building permitting, in accordance with Heights Landscape Design Overlay District requirements. Board of Adjustment (SEPTEMBER 15, 2022) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation for approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item remained on the Consent Agenda for approval. There was a motion made and seconded. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. The application was approved. 2 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 2 Z-9710 File No.: Z-9710 Owners: Zachary and Leah Payne Applicant: Zachary Payne Address: 5619 P Street Legal Description: Lot G, Matthews Replat of Lots 4 thru 10, Block 28, Mountain Park Addition, Addition of City of Little Rock, Pulaski County Arkansas Zoned: R-2 Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance(s) Requested: A variance is requested from area regulations of Sec. 36-254 to allow a reduced rear yard setback in the R-2 district. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated July 8, 2022. STAFF REPORT A. Planning and Development Civil Engineering Comments: No Comments. B. Buffering and Landscape Comments: No Comments. C. Building Codes Comments: The required fire separation distance (building to property line) prescribed by the building code terminates at five (5) feet. Buildings are allowed to be closer than five (5) feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite one (1) hour fire resistance rating. When buildings are five (5) feet or more from the property line, the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself, only the projections such as eaves or overhangs. Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three (3) feet from the property line and are prohibited when the exterior wall is less than three (3) feet from the line. There is no restriction on openings when the exterior wall is more than three (3) feet from the property line. 1 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.) Z-9710 Contact the City of Little Rock Building Codes (501)371-4832 for additional details. D. Staff Analysis: The property at 5619 P Street is located in the predominantly R-2 zoned neighborhood, within the Heights Landscape Design Overlay District. This overlay district generally has no bearing on the subject variance requests. The subject property is located on the south side of the road, the second parcel east of the intersection of N Filmore and P Street. An alley is adjacent to the east side of the property while a large single R-2 zoned parcel borders the south and west sides. The existing 1524 square feet frame home was built in 1960 and has undergone minimal improvements throughout the years that is often typical of homes in this neighborhood. The sketch provided by the applicant indicates a proposal for an addition to the residence that will wrap around the southwest and southeast sides of the home. The new construction will extend from the southwest face of the house and existing carport approximately 18-feet before turning to the southeast and proceeding for an additional 35.5 feet. The new wail will then run northeast for 28.3 feet before returning 12.5-feet back to the southeast corner of the house which is shared with an existing deck. The new space will add approximately 800 square feet to the primary structure and extend the south corner of the proposed building 18-feet across the 25-foot setback, placing the new construction 7-feet from the rear property line. Section 36-254(d)(3) states: "There shall be a rear yard setback having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet." Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the extension of the primary structure 18-feet into the rear yard setback. Staff views the rear yard setback variance of this home addition as minor compared with the buildable capacity available to the property owner. Staff is supportive of the requested variance to allow the primary structure to cross the building line 18-feet, reducing the rear yard setback to 7-feet. The proposed house addition will not be out of character with other homes throughout this neighborhood and believes the extension of the primary structure will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. Staff finds the requests to generally be in conformance with the development pattern in this area, and based on the above assessment and analysis, finds the requested variance to be reasonable. 2 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.) Z-9710 E. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested rear yard setback reduction from twenty-five (25) feet to a minimum of 7-feet as per the staff analysis and attached sketch / site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit being obtained for all construction. 2. Install trees, if deemed applicable at the time of building permitting, in accordance with Heights Landscape Design Overlay District requirements. Board of Adjustment (SEPTEMBER 15, 2022) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation for approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item remained on the Consent Agenda for approval. There was a motion made and seconded. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. The application was approved. 3 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 3 Z-9712 File No.: Z-9712 Owner: Odistene and Waymon Fuller Applicant: Ron Bene' Woods / Wood's Group Architects Inc Address: 8312 Colonel Glenn Rd Legal Description: The East 1/2 of Lot 16 and all of Lots 17 and 18 and the South 'h of the alley now closed by Little Rock Ordinance Number 12,836 filed in Deed Book 1263, Page 100 lying North of and adjacent to the E1/2 of Lot 16, and all of Lots 17, and 18, Block 4, Pike Addition to the City of Little Rock Pulaski County, Arkansas Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-301 to allow a building addition with a reduced rear and side yard setback. A variance is requested from the parking regulations of Sec. 36-502 to allow a reduced number of parking spaces required for a commercial / restaurant development. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter. Present Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Restaurant / Retail STAFF REPORT A. Planning and Development Civil Engineering: 1. Show existing ditch and curb inlet near eastern property line on site plan. 2. Provide legend showing what hatch markings correspond to what pavement design improvements for the parking lot, dumpster pad, and driveway. 3. Is the existing concrete driveway (i.e., curb cut) being reconstructed? If so, an access driveway permit from ARDOT District 6 will be required. Contact ARDOT District Permit officer at 501-569-2266. If not, do not show any hatching for it since this implies this will be new, reconstructed driveway. 1 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.) Z-9712 4. Which existing driveway are they calling out to be used? This parcel has two driveway accesses with a curb inlet in between them? Will the existing curb inlet be demolished? 5. Any work performed in ARDOT right of way will require a special permit from ARDOT District 6. Contact ARDOT District Permit officer at 501-569-2266. 6. Show and label all city streets and state highways on site plan. 7. A drainage study will be required to be submitted to the Department showing all hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for the site before issuance of a future building permit. 8. Proposed curb openings on west property cannot be allowed due to direct discharge onto public right of way. Runoff from parking will have to be collected via inlets and tie into existing storm sewer system on Colonel Glenn or Cobb St. 9. Stormwater detention won't be required since they are reducing the overall runoff coefficient less than existing because of the new landscaping. B. Landscape and Buffer Issues,- 1 Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. The property is located in the City's designated mature area. A twenty-five (25%) percent reduction of the buffer requirements is acceptable. The minimum dimension of the perimeter planting strip shall be six (6) feet nine (9) inches. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. The south and east perimeter planting strips are deficient, and portions of the north and west perimeter planting strips are deficient. 3. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street rights -of -way. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. 7. An irrigation system shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. For developments of less than one (1) acre a there shall be a water source within seventy-five (75) feet of all plant material if an automatic irrigation system is not provided. 2 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 3 (CON'T.) Z-9712 8. All landscape areas shall be protected as per City of Little Rock Landscape Ordinance (Sec. 15-100). Provide notes on plan specifying type and location of mulch, edging, wheel stops, and/or concrete curb and gutter. 9. All ground or roof mounted mechanical systems shall be screened from abutting properties and streets. Any trash receptacles or pickup shall be oriented away from a primary street side of the property and screened from the public right-of-way. Screen shall exceed the height of the dumpster or trash containment areas by at least two (2) feet no to exceed eight (8) feet total height. 10. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. Any landscape code requirements that cannot be met may require an additional variance. Landscape code variances are heard by the City Beautiful Commission. A building permit cannot be issued until all code requirements and variances are approved. C. Building Codes Comments: No Comments. D. Staff Analysis' The C-3 zoned property located at 8312 Colonel Glenn Rd is within a predominantly commercial district west of S University Avenue and east of the Colonel Glenn / Stagecoach Rd intersection. Positioned on the north side of the street this small lot is bordered by a vacant R-4 parcel to the north, vacant C-3 parcel to the east, and a narrow unbuildable R-2 parcel to the west that is occupied by a drainage channel. The applicant formerly operated a restaurant on the west side of the adjacent R-2 parcel sharing a small building with another retail business. Several years ago the owners of this building decided to expand their business thus ending the applicant's lease. The applicant has stated that they intend to remain on Colonel Glenn Rd in the community where they have built relationships and loyal clientele over the past 10 years. They have purchased a .38-acre site just east of the R-2 (drainage channel property) and additionally obtained a pre-engineered metal building that has not yet been constructed. Upon hiring a consultant to layout the program elements of the project it was discovered that the building footprint, required parking, and vehicular circulation would be problematic in meeting the requirements for a restaurant and retail business combination. 3 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 3 (CON'TJ Z-9712 The building is shown to be 3,840 square feet that combines 1,674 square feet of restaurant space, 1,500 square feet of retail space with a combined storage space totaling 306 square feet. Parking requirements for restaurants are 1 space per 100 square feet. The retail component only requires 1 space per 400 square feet. The overall development as shown will require a total of 20 spaces,16 for the restaurant and 4 for the retail. The pre-engineered structure is unable to be altered and is approximately 65x60 feet. The average depth of the lot is approximately 135-feet in width and 125-feet depth. To provide an adequate parking layout the building is shown to be placed in the rear and (east) side yard setbacks. The northeast corner of the building is indicated to be located 11.5-feet from the rear property line encroaching into the rear yard setback 13.5-feet. The southeast corner of the building is proposed to be placed 4.75 feet from the (east) side yard property line encroaching 10.25-feet into the side yard setback. Additionally, the parking and drive aisle configuration will encroach into the south and west perimeters which will require a landscape variance to be developed as proposed. Section 36-301 (e)(2) states: "There shall be a side yard on each side of the building having a width of not less than fifteen (15) feet..." Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the building to have a side yard setback of not less than 4.75-feet Section 36-301 (e)(3) states: "There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet..." Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the building to have a rear yard setback of not less than 10.25-feet. Sec. 36-502(3)(a) General business and retail sales, states: the minimum parking requirement is "One (1) space per four hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area..." and Sec. 36-502(3)(c) Restaurants, states: the minimum parking requirement is 1.0 space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area". Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the combined use required parking spaces from 20 to 16. Staff views the rear and side yard setback variances of this small parcel as minor compared with the buildable capacity available to the property owner. Additionally, staff regards the appeal for a reduction of 4 parking spaces as acceptable. The improvements will not be out of character with many other developments in this general area. There are numerous structures in this older commercial district which have reduced rear and/or side yard setbacks and parking areas that are completely paved eliminating drive aisles and perimeter buffers between the vehicular use areas and the street right-of-way. The proposed interior, building and perimeter landscape areas will be within or closer in compliance with the prescribed parking and circulation requirements of many of the surrounding commercial properties. 4 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 3 (CON'T.) Z-9712 Based on the analysis above, staff believes the subject proposal is in keeping with the character and scale of the surrounding properties and follows the current development requirements. Staff views the variance requests as reasonable. E. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested side and rear yard setback variances and the reduced parking variance as per the above staff analysis and as specified on the submitted site plan, subject to the following conditions: Compliance with the Planning and Development Civil Engineering and the Landscape and Buffer requirements as noted in paragraphs A & B of the staff report. Board of Adjustment (SEPTEMBER 15, 2 0 2 2 ) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation for approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item remained on the Consent Agenda for approval. There was a motion made and seconded. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. The application was approved. 5 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 4 Z-9721 File No.: Z-9721 Owners: Common Ground Properties Applicant: Adam Fogelman Address: 1920 Bragg Street Legal Description: Lot 18, Block 1, Oak Glenn Addition, to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County Arkansas Zoned: R-4 Present Use: Single-family Residence Proposed Use: Single-family Residence Variance(s) Requested: A variance is requested from area regulations of Sec. 36-256 to allow a reduced front yard setback in the R-4 district. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented as per the attached letter dated July 19, 2022. STAFF REPORT A. Planning and Development Civil Engineering Comments: No Comments. B. Buffering and Landscape Comments: No Comments. C. Building Codes Comments: No Comments. D. Staff Analysis: The property at 1920 Bragg Street is located within a predominantly R-4 zoned neighborhood. This parcel, on the west side of the street is located at the approximate midway point between E 181h St to the north, and E 21st to the south. The survey indicates the lot to be 50 feet in width and 150 feet in length. The small 900 square foot frame home that occupies the site was built in 1950. The main body of structure is located 25.2-feet from the property line with the front porch extending another 4.1-feet towards the west, locating this platform 21.1-feet from the front property line. 1 SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 ITEM NO. 4 (CON'T.) Z-9707 The applicant is renovating the home and desires to add a larger covered front porch stating that "a room sized front covered porch will offer a greater connection of the home and its residence to the street and will encourage contact and conversation among neighbors and passerby." The proposed porch is indicated to be located at the center of the house and be 12-feet in width and extend from the front of the home 8-feet. The 2-steps shown on the applicant's sketch indicate that the new porch will be at the at the same level as the exiting landing at 1.5 - 2-feet above finished grade. The new porch is shown to be located 17-feet from the property line encroaching 8-feet into the front yard setback. Section 36-256(d)(1) states, "There shall be a front yard setback having a depth of not less than twenty-five (25) feet." Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the extension of the primary structure into the front yard setback to no more than 8-feet reducing the front yard setback to 17-feet. Many of the surrounding properties have covered porches of this size that have been constructed across the front building lines. The applicant's proposal will not be out of character with the neighborhood. In staff s opinion, the proposed setback reduction will pose no negative effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the public, and will not detract from the value or aesthetic of the neighborhood or surrounding properties. Based on the analysis above, staff believes the subject proposal is in keeping with the character and scale of the surrounding residential properties and follows current development patterns established in the area. Staff views the variance request as reasonable. E. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested front yard setback reduction from 25 feet to a minimum to 17-feet as per the above staff analysis and as specified on the submitted site plan subject to the following condition: 1. A building permit being obtained for all construction. Board of Adjustment (SEPTEMBER 15, 2022) The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation for approval as outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item remained on the Consent Agenda for approval. There was a motion made and seconded. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. The application was approved. 2 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - VOTE RECORD DATE: September 15, 2022 Time: 4:OOPM Time In / Time Out In Out ALLISON, FRANK ✓ BERTRAM, JAMES ✓ GRINDER, AUSTIN ✓ JUSTUS,JOE ✓ RUSSELL, JEREMIAH D Cnst Min Agenda Regular Agenda ITEM & VOTE Item Number: ALLISON, FRANK ✓ ✓ BERTRAM, JAMES ✓ ✓ GRINDER, AUSTIN ✓ ✓ JUSTUS,JOE ✓ ✓ RUSSELL, JEREMIAH D D ✓AYE XAYE A_ABSENT R RECUSE Meeting Adjourned 4:08 PM SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 4:08 p.m. Date: Chairman Secretary