HDC_04 07 2005City of Lithe Rock
Historic
Department of Planning and Development District
723 West Markham Street Commission
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435
LITTLE ROCK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MINUTES
Thursday, April 7, 2005, 5:00 p.m.
Sister Cities' Conference Room, City Hall
I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being four (4) in number
Members Present: Marshall Peters
Carolyn Newbern
Wesley Walls
Job Serebrov
Members Absent: Wyatt Weems
City Attorney: Deborah Weldon
Staff Present: Tony Bozynski
Charles Bloom
Brian Minyard
II. Approval of Minutes
a. August 5, 2004
It was acknowledged that the August Minutes were completed by
the Housing Department and had been past due. Commissioner
Walls made a motion to approve, Commissioner Newbern
seconded. The Minutes were approved 4 yes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.
b. September 2, 2004
It was acknowledged that the September Minutes were completed
by the Housing Department and had been past due. Commissioner
Walls made a motion to approve, Commissioner Newbern
seconded. The Minutes were approved 4 yes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.
c. February 3, 2005
Commissioner Walls made a motion to approve, Commissioner
Newbern seconded. The Minutes were approved 4 yes, 0 noes, and
1 absent.
III. Finding of Compliance with Notice Requirements of all Subjects
a. 402 East Ninth Street
City Attorney Debra Weldon reviewed the Certified Mail receipts.
It was found that the applicant had fulfilled the notice
requirements.
b. 1200 South Scott Street
City Attorney Debra Weldon reviewed the Certified Mail receipts.
It was found that the applicant had fulfilled the notice
requirements.
IV. New Certificates of Appropriateness
a. 402 East Ninth Street
Tom Gray and Steve Mcateer were present to present this
application. (Staff had received written statements from the
building owner authorizing Tom Gray and Steve Mcateer to speak
on their behalf).
Mr. Gray described the specifics of the door including that the
doors would look like the ones pictured in Example 2 (another
commercial building at 316 East I1`" Street). Mr. Gray noted that
the doors would have wood jambs.
Walls commented on the occupancy status of the building. Mr.
Gray commented that there are currently three commercial tenants
and an upstairs apartment in the building.
Commissioner Newbern asked if they were doing any other work.
Mr. Gray replied, "No."
Commissioner Peters asked if the applicant was aware of the
specific composition of the brick since it is soft mortar. Mr. Gray
and Mr. Mcateer said they were not aware of it.
Commissioner Walls noted that use of conventional new Portland
Cement would cause expansion and cracking of existing mortar
joints. Mr. Gray noted that they would be willing to comply with
any special mortar needs.
Commissioner Newbern asked if they would be saving the bricks
they were taking out. Mr. Gray said they would replace the brick
around the doors with existing brick. The applicant had tried to
match the brick before and found this route to be best.
Commissioner Walls asked which direction the doors would be
swinging. Mr. Gray said they would swing outward.
Commissioner Peters asked as to what mechanism would prevent
them from swinging inward. Mr. Gray said that they would have a
"stop hit" at the bottom and that no door hardware would be on the
outside.
Commissioner Newbern made a motion to approve the application
as filed noting that the applicant plans to be careful with the brick
removal process, reuse existing brick around the door edges, and
will be careful with the composition of new mortar to ensure
compatibility with existing mortar. Commissioner Walls
seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously with 4
ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.
b. 1200 South Scott Street
Steve Dannaway and Mark Burnett were present to present the
application to the Commission. They commented that this was
their first time in front of the Historic District Commission (It was
clarified that they were not involved in the COA application for the
initial construction of this building in 2003). Mr. Dannaway
described the boat, its location, and purpose. Mr. Dannaway also
mentioned that the alley behind his property has been previously
closed by Ordinance and was jointly owned by the property to the
west of him.
Commissioner Newburn asked Mr. Dannaway if it would be
possible for a semi trailer or fire truck to hit it. He replied "No,"
and commented that it is set back 15 feet from the alley.
Commissioner Walls asked Mr. Dannaway for clarity on the signs
purpose. He replied, that it "is an icon for a new show" that will
start airing on ESPN in July.
Commissioner Serebrov asked Mr. Dannaway who could cancel
the show. He replied that ESPN can cancel the show and if the
show is cancelled the boat would come down. Mr. Dannaway also
commented that ESPN had worked with the applicant's company
for twenty five years and cancellation would be unlikely.
Commissioner Newbern asked Mr. Dannaway indicated that the
boat should and BassTech sign should not be lighted ant night. He
replied that they wouldn't light the sign or boat.
Commissioner Newbern asked Mr. Dannaway if the BassTech sign
and boat would come down if the show was ceased or cancelled.
He replied that they would.
Commissioner Newbern asked Mr. Dannaway if they would apply
for a COA in the event that they apply for additional signage. He
replied, "Yes."
Commissioner Newbern asked Boyd Maher of the Arkansas
Historic Preservation Program what his opinion on the signage
was. He responded, "If their was a place for a boat in a historic
district this would be it," because it is on new construction, at the
edge of the district, and does not have a detrimental effect on the
neighborhood. He added that this development was one of the first
new developments in the historic district and was good overall.
A brief discussion between the Commissioners began regarding the
staff recommendations. It was agreed that staff recommendation
on (1) regarding the time frame for review be reduced from 24
months to twelve (12) months, and a sixth condition regarding the
possibility of the shows cancellation.
Commissioner Walls made a motion to approve the application
with the following conditions:
1. That the Certificate of Appropriateness for the "flying boat"
and sign be reviewed by staff in twelve (12) months in order to
ensure that they are still relevant and have been properly
maintained.
2. The "flying boat" and sign is not directly illuminated at night.
3. That the "flying boat" and sign be removed if the business
vacates the premises.
4. That no signage or lettering be displayed on the "flying boat"
except for the existing "Triton Boats" lettering.
5. That trees surrounding the southern half of the lot not be
removed while the "flying boat" is in place.
6. If the contract for the television show is cancelled the boat and
sign will be removed.
Commissioner Serebrov seconded. The motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.
V. Deferred Certificates of Appropriateness
a. None
VI. Other Matters
a. Revised Design Guidelines Book (Progress Report)
Staff member Bloom noted that the guidelines book was still a
work in progress and nearly complete. Commissioner Walls and
Newbern expressed their intent to schedule an upcoming meeting
to finish the guidelines book.
b. CLG Discussion
A brief discussion was made regarding the status of the upcoming
CLG grant applications and noted that they would be due on April
15, 2005. It was decided that a resurvey of the Central High
Neighborhood would be appropriate, as well as the printing of
brochures to educate homeowners within existing and potential
Local Ordinance Districts.
c. Bylaws Discussion
Issues with the bylaws were discussed amongst Commissioners
and Staff. Commissioner Serebrov felt the need for additional
restrictions on the length of time the Commission can grant
deferrals. The Commission decided that a separate meeting would
be held on Wednesday April 27, 2005 at 2:00pm to discuss the
Bylaws in detail.
VII. Adjournment.
A motion was made to adjourn at 6:30.
ATTEST:
Chairman Secretary
Date: