boa_02 25 2019LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
2:00 P.M.
I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being three (3) in number.
II.Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings
The Minutes of the January 28, 2019 meeting were
approved.
Members Present: Frank Allison -Chairman
Carolyn Lindsey Polk
Richard Bertram -Vice Chair
Members Absent: Austin Grinder
Open Position
City Attorney Present: Sherri Latimer
LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
2:00 P.M.
I. OLD BUSINESS:
No Old Business
II.NEW BUSINESS:
1.Z-5508-B 18500 Cooper Orbit Road
2.Z-9284-A 3910 Asher Avenue
3.Z-9390 423 N. Monroe Street
4.Z-9391 1509 Winslow Drive
5.Z-9392 10 Turtle Creek Lane
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 1
File No.: Z-5508-B
Owner: Second Baptist Church
Applicant: James Walden
Address: 18500 Cooper Orbit Road
Description: West side of Cooper Orbit Road, north of Colonel Glenn Road
Zoned: AF
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section
36-338 to allow construction of a pavilion structure with
reduced front setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Outdoor Center - Summer Day Camp
Proposed Use of Property: Outdoor Center - Summer Day Camp
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
1.Cooper Orbit Road is designated a collector street with sixty (60) feet of
right-of-way per the Master Street Plan. Any proposed improvements must be
located outside of the public right-of-way measured thirty (30) feet from the street
centerline.
8.Staff Analysis:
The AF zoned property at 18500 Cooper Orbit Road is occupied by the Lake Nixon
Outdoor Center, a day camp/summer camp/recreational facility. The property
contains a large lake with swimming area. There are several structures on the north
side of the lake, including pavilions, administrative offices, restrooms and
concessions. The property is located on the western side of Cooper Orbit Road,
north of Colonel Glenn Road.
The applicant proposes to construct a 20 foot by 40 foot pavilion structure on the
site, as noted on the attached site plan. The pavilion will be unenclosed on all sides,
and will be located where a temporary structure previously existed. The proposed
pavilion structure will be located 18.5 feet to 38.4 feet back from the front (north)
property line along Cooper Orbit Road. The structure will be located approximately
40 feet to 60 feet back from the centerline of Cooper Orbit Road.
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.) Z-5508-B
Section 36-338(f)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front
setback of 50 feet for non-single family structures in AF zoning. Therefore the
applicant is requesting a variance to allow placement of the pavilion building with
reduced front setback.
Staff is supportive of the requested front setback variance. Staff views the request
as reasonable. The proposed pavilion structure will replace a temporary structure
which was approved for this location by the Board of Adjustment on February 27,
2017. At that time it was noted that the applicant had plans for a future permanent
structure. The proposed front setback will not be out of character with other front
setbacks in this area. The proposed pavilion structure will be located approximately
40 feet to 60 feet back from the centerline of Cooper Orbit Road and behind the
fence line of the Lake Nixon Property. Staff believes the proposed pavilion structure
will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested front setback variance, subject to
compliance with the Public Works requirement as noted in paragraph A. of the staff
report.
Board of Adjustment (February 25, 2019)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The
vote was 3 ayes, O noes, 1 absent and 1 open position. 2
January 27, 2019
City of Little Rock
Board of Adjustment
Planning and Development
723 W. Markham St.
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Zoning Variance for Pavilion at Lake Nixon Outdoor Center -18500 Cooper Orbit Road
Board Members,
We are requesting a setback variance from the required 50' to XX' in the Agriculture and Forestry (AF)
Zoning to place an open air pavilion. Our property is located at 18500 Cooper Orbit Road within the
Little Rock's ETJ. Second Baptist Church Downtown (2BC) has operated the Lake Nixon Outdoor
Center since 1969, as a summer day camp and ministry center for the church. The current pavilion
construction project is being pursued to allow the addition of a middle school camp component to
our current day camp and outdoor preschool operations. This is being pursued to conform with DHS
permit requirements.
Lake Nixon is a historic site listed on National Register of Historic Places due to its important civil
rights history. Many of the structures on the site were constructed prior to being zoned within Little
Rock's ETJ. As such, most all the structures do not conform the setback requirements. Additionally,
our site is bisected by Cooper Orbit Road, a prescriptive right-of-way for which there is no dedicated
right-of-way. Approval of the variance is justified for the following reasons:
-The presence of the lake in proximity to Cooper Orbit Road in combination with the extremely
rugged terrain significantly limits the constructible property on the site.
From an operational standpoint, the pavilion needs to be in close proximity to existing day
camp structures on the site to allow functional use as shelter.
-Placement of the structure closer to Cooper Orbit Road is necessary due to site slopes.
Building closer to the lake would require significant dirt work that would likely result in greater
quantities of sediment eroding into lake, degrading water quality.
-Placement of the structure closer to Cooper Orbit Road allows for a larger runoff filtration
area between the building and lake. We have observed from our structures which are closer
to the lake that they result in more undesirable runoff reaching the lake. (cleaning agents,
trash, etc.)
-While AF zoning is a "best fit" for our property, the purposes and requirements of the zone
do not match well to our operations. 2BC has commissioned a master plan for the outdoor
center. It is our intent to seek a planned zoning district once we have a firmer idea of all the
future proposed structures on-site. This includes future re/ocatlon of Coooer Orbit Road to the
North.
We appreciate your consideration of this item.
Respectfully,
James Walden
Lake Nixon Committee
Second Baptist Church -Downtown
501.940.5122
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 2
File No.: Z-9284-A
Owner: Glynda Gibson
Applicant: Cedric and Tomerra Love
Address: 3910 Asher Avenue
Description: Northwest corner of Asher Avenue and S. Pine Street
Zoned: C-3
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the parking provisions of Section
36-502 to allow use of an existing building as a restaurant with
reduced off-street parking.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Vacant Commercial Building
Proposed Use of Property: Restaurant
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
1.Public Works staff has no comments on the variance to Sec. 36-502.
2.South Pine Street is classified as a collector street on the Master Street Plan.
Dedication of right-of-way thirty (30) feet (or to building frontage, whichever is
less) from street centerline is required prior to approval of any building permits.
3.Asher Avenue is classified as a minor arterial street on the Master Street Plan.
Dedication of right-of-way forty-five (45) feet (or to building frontage, whichever
is less) from centerline will be required prior to approval of any building permits.
4.A twenty (20) foot radial (or to building frontage, whichever is less) dedication
of right-of-way at the intersection of South Pine Street and Asher Avenue is
required. Right-of-way dedication must be provided prior to approval of a
certificate of occupancy.
5.With site development, boundary street improvements conforming to the
Master Street Plan must be provided for South Pine Street and Asher Avenue.
Boundary street improvements shall include, but not be limited to,
reconstruction of one-half section of the abutting street if the existing street is
not up to city standards. Repair, replace, or extend existing damaged, missing,
and noncompliant curb and gutter, sidewalk, access ramps or concrete
driveway aprons within the public right-of-way adjacent to the site. Remove
abandoned driveway cuts and replace with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. All work
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.) 9284-A
within the public right-of-way shall conform to City of Little Rock Standard
Details and ADA guidelines.
B.Landscape and Buffer Issues:
C.
1.Site plan must comply with the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance and the City's
minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Any new development
shall adhere to the current landscape code.
2.Any existing vehicular use area that does not meet current code requirements
may continue as nonconforming until such time a building permit is issued to
rehabilitate a structure on the property exceeding fifty (50) percent of the
current replacement cost of the structure. At such time fifty (50) percent of the
existing vehicular use area shall be brought into compliance with current code
and shall continue to full compliance on a graduated scale based upon the
percentage of rehabilitation cost.
3.All ground or roof mounted mechanical systems shall be screened from
abutting properties and streets. Any trash receptacles or pickup shall be
oriented away from a primary street side of the property and screened from the
public right-of-way. Screen shall exceed the height of the dumpster or trash
containment areas by at least two (2) feet not to exceed eight (8) feet total
height.
4.The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing
trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper
or larger.
Staff Analysis:
The C-3 zoned property at 3910 Asher Avenue is occupied by a commercial
building which contains approximately 5,500 square feet of floor space. The
property is located at the northwest corner of Asher Avenue and S. Pine Street. A
20 foot wide paved alley right-of-way is located along the rear (west) property line.
Paved parking is located on the north and south sides of the commercial building.
The site contains approximately 25 parking spaces. Driveways from Asher
Avenue, S. Pine Street and the alley right-of-way serve as access to the property.
The applicant proposes to utilize approximately 3,600 square feet of the
commercial building as a restaurant. The remainder of the building will not be
used. The applicant notes that the establishment will be a sit-down restaurant with
carry-out service. There will be a small bar area that will also serve as a seating
area for the restaurant. The applicant notes that the hours of operation will be as
follows:
Noon to 1 :00 A.M. - Sunday
11:00 AM. to Midnight - Monday through Thursday
11:00 AM. to 2:00 AM. - Friday through Saturday
2
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 2 (CONT.) 9284-A
Section 36-502(b)(3)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of
36 off-street parking spaces to serve a 3,600 square foot restaurant use.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the restaurant with
approximately 25 off-street parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a written
lease agreement to lease the existing paved parking area on the west side of the
alley right-of-way, immediately west of the subject property. The written lease
agreement is with the property owner Allen Temple AME Church and runs from
June 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The paved parking area on the west side of the
alley can accommodate 24 to 30 vehicles.
Staff is supportive of the requested parking variance. Staff views the request as
reasonable, as long as the lease agreement is maintained to lease the paved
parking area on the west side of the alley right-of-way. Staff feels that the existing
on-site parking (25 spaces) is not enough to serve a restaurant use of the size
proposed. Additionally, the existing parking areas on the site, as well as the extra
parking area across the alley, will need to be measured and striped as per city
code. In addition to maintaining the parking lease agreement, staff's support is
based on the building being used as a sit-down restaurant and not an event center
or private club. The building cannot be rented out for events (parties, receptions,
etc.), nor can special events be held for an entry fee (concerts, stand-up comedy,
etc.). Staff believes a restaurant use at this location, with the parking plan as
proposed, will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general
area.
D.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested parking variance, subject to the
following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs A. and B. of the
staff report.
2.The lease agreement for the existing parking area on the west side of the alley
right-of-way (Lots 6 and 7, Block 14, Butler's Addition) must be valid and
maintained as long as the restaurant is in operation. If the lease agreement
expires, the parking variance will become void and the restaurant use must
cease operation.
3.The property shall not be used as an event center or private club use. The
building shall not be rented out for any events. No events which require entry
fee or cover charge shall be held at this location.
Board of Adjustment (February 25, 2019)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The
vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position.
3
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
lTEM NO.: 3
File No.: Z-9390
Owner/Applicant: John and Rosalia Block
Address: 423 N. Monroe Street
Description: Southeast corner of N. Monroe Street and Lee Avenue
Zoned: R-3
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section
36-156 to allow an accessory structure with a reduced street
side setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B.Staff Analysis:
The R-3 zoned property located at 423 N. Monroe Street is occupied by a two-story
frame single family residence. The property is located at the southeast corner of
N.Monroe Street and Lee Avenue. A paved alley is located along the rear (east)
property line.
The applicant recently constructed a 12 foot by 16 foot accessory storage building
at the northeast corner of the property, as noted on the attached site plan. The new
storage building replaces a 12 foot by 18 foot garage structure which previously
existed on the site and was in a state of disrepair. The new storage building is
located three (3) feet from the north street side property line and 6. 7 feet from the
rear (east) property line.
Section 36-156(a)(2)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that an accessory
structure in R-3 zoning be located at least 15 feet back from a street side property
line. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the storage building
with a reduced street side setback. All other setbacks and rear yard coverage
conform to ordinance requirements.
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.) Z-9390
Staff is supportive of the requested street side setback for the new storage building.
Staff views the request as reasonable. The new building is located on a concrete
slab where a slightly larger garage structure previously existed. The new structure
maintains the same street side setback as the previous garage structure. The
proposed placement of the storage building will not be out of character with other
properties throughout this neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed structure
complies with the Hillcrest Design Overlay District. Staff believes the new storage
building will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested street side setback variance, as filed.
Board of Adjustment (February 25, 2019)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments and conditions. The
vote was 3 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position.
2
I am writing this as a request for a zoning variance for my property and specifically the
accessory building at the northeast corner of the lot at 423 N Monroe St. Little Rock AR, 72205.
I believe that there was some confusion when filing the paperwork for the repairs to be done.
One set of paperwork which I had submitted indicated that we would move the building to the
existing parking pad and the previo�s structure would be demolished. However, it was then
decided that the building would stay in the same place as this would prevent the need for
backing out onto Lee St itself and would allow us to retain two off-street parking spaces at our
home. The decision to move forward with "repairs to acces�ory structure" was made and I was
informed that as long as the previous building was not entirely demolished by the time that
construction began on the new accessory building that it would properly qualify as repairs to
accessory structure. As it stands, the current building is further from the street than the
previous structure and does not impede the flow of driving traffic, walking traffic or alley traffic.
The previous structure, left by the previous homeowners, was housing countless rodents and
was in danger of falling and could have injured someone walking on the sidewalk abutting Lee
St. The decision to build a new structure was made and added to the value of the home and
additionally to the curb appeal and visual appearance of the lot and therefore the
nei ghborhood. It is with all of these considerations in mind that I believe we should qualify for a
zoning varic1nce moving forward. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John Block
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 4
File No.: Z-9391
Owner: Adam and Jenny Carson
Applicant: Jim Yeary
Address: 1509 Winslow Drive
Description: Lot 10, Hall Cove Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section
36-254 to allow a garage addition with reduced rear yard
setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B.Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 1509 Winslow Drive is occupied by a one-story brick and
frame single family residence. The property is located on the east side of Winslow
Drive, north of N. Hughes Street. A one-car wide driveway is located at the
northwest corner of the lot. The driveway runs along the north side of the residence
to an attached carport at the northeast corner of the residence. The carport portion
of the residence is located approximately 21.5 feet back from the rear (east) property
line. The lot contains a 35 foot front platted building line.
The applicant proposes to enclose and extend the existing carport portion of the
residence, to become a new two-car garage addition. The proposed garage addition
will be located ten (10) feet back from the rear (east) property line and 22 feet back
from the north side property line.
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 4 (CONT.) Z-9391
Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear
setback of 25 feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a
variance to allow the garage addition with a reduced rear setback. The applicant is
also making a sunroom addition near the center of the structure which conforms to
ordinance requirements.
Staff is supportive of the requested rear setback variance. Staff views the request
as reasonable. The R-2 zoned lot contains a 35 foot front platted building line, which
pushes the home 10 feet further back on the lot than is typically required. The lot
has a standard 150 foot depth. The increased front building line does somewhat
reduce the amount of typical building area for this R-2 zoned lot. Additionally,
adequate separation will exist between the proposed garage addition and the
nearest structure to the east. A fairly major electrical power line runs along the rear
(east) property line between the subject structure and the structure to the east. Staff
believes the proposed garage addition with reduced rear setback will have no
adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested rear setback variance, as filed.
Board of Adjustment (February 25, 2019)
Jim Yeary was present, representing the application. There were two (2) objectors
present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval.
Jim Yeary addressed the board in support of the application. He explained that the
existing carport portion of the residence already encroaches into the required rear yard
setback. He noted that the garage would be attached to the principal structure and that
it could be closer to the rear and side property lines if it were a detached structure.
Chairman Allison asked if the existing carport was closer than 25 feet to the rear property
line. Mr. Yeary noted that it was and explained.
Larry Kirchner and Clayton Belknap addressed the Board in opposition. They discussed
the' history of the abandonment of N. Hughes Street adjacent to their property and the
easements which run through the rear portion of their property. The issue was further
discussed.
Mr. Yeary further noted that the structure could be detached and maintain the ten (10)
foot setback from the rear property line as proposed.
Chairman Allison offered the applicant a deferral based on the fact that only three (3)
members of the Board were present. Mr. Yeary stated that he wished to move forward.
There was a motion to approve the application as filed. The motion passed by a vote of
3 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent and 1 open position.
2
Yeary Lindsey Architects
January 16, 2019
Mr. Monte Moore
Department of Planning and Development
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Re: Adam and Jenny Carson Variance Request
1509 Winslow Drive
Little Rock, AR
Dear Monte,
Please find attached our submittal to the Little Rock Board of Adjustments requesting a
variance regarding the property at 1509 Winslow Drive.
Our clients are requesting a variance to the rear yard setback regulations in order to enclose
and extend the existing carport to become a new 2-car garage. They are requesting the
variance due to the existing 35-foot front yard setback being 10 feet deeper than is typical,
restricting space in the rear yard. The increased depth of the front yard setback is due to a 10-
foot easement at the west face of the house. 10-foot easements also exist at the south and east
sides of the property, and the existing house and proposed additions are constrained to
conform to these easements. Additionally, the existing carport already exceeds the 25-foot rear
yard setback as built, and its extension would allow for a fully functioning 2-car garage in place
of the carport.
If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me. We
appreciate your consideration of our request.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jim Yeary, AIA
3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 501-372-5940 Fax: 501-663-0043
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 5
File No.: Z-9392
Owner: The Student Loan Guarantee Foundation of Arkansas
Applicant: Mark Rose, KA TV
Address: 10 Turtle Creek Lane
Description: Tract M-2A, Riverdale Addition
Zoned: O-3
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the height provisions of Section
36-201 to allow a broadcast tower with increased height.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Office Building
Proposed Use of Property: Office Building with broadcast studio
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
1.Public Works staff has no comment on the variance to Section 36-201.
2.Public Works staff has not reviewed any other part of this project at this time, and
additional comments may be provided prior to approval of the building permit.
B.Staff Analysis:
The O-3 zoned property at 10 Turtle Creek Lane is occupied by a two-story office
building located within the south half of the overall 3.98 acre property. The property
is located on the north side of Turtle Creek Lane, between Brookwood Drive and
Riverfront Drive. A driveway from Turtle Creek Lane and a driveway from
Brookwood Drive serve as access to the property. Paved parking is located on the
south and west sides of the building. The north half of the overall property is
undeveloped and grass covered.
Sinclair Broadcast Group/KATV is in the process of purchasing this property at
10 Turtle Creek Lane, with the intent of relocating their broadcast studio from its
current location at 410 Main Street. As part of the relocation, the applicant proposes
to construct a 100 foot tall broadcast tower within the undeveloped, north portion of
the property, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed tower will be a
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 5 (CON'T.} Z-9392
self-supporting metal truss frame tower. The proposed tower will be located well
over 100 feet back from the building and all property lines. The tower structure finish
will be galvanized steel. A small antenna or dish will be attached to the tower
structure near the top, but will not extend past the top of the 100 foot tall tower.
Section 36-201(e)(1)a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum tower
height of 75 feet for metal ground-mounted towers. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow the proposed tower with increased height.
Staff is supportive of the requested tower height variance. Staff views the request
as reasonable. The proposed tower height of 100 feet will not be out of character
with the, heights of other buildings and tower structures in this general area.
Signal Media Radio at 2400 Cottondale Lane has a 154 foot tall broadcast tower.
There are also several multi-story buildings in this area along Riverfront Drive. The
applicant notes that studies were conducted and it was determined that the absolute
minimum tower height that will work for this location is 100 feet. Staff believes the
proposed 100 foot tall tower at this location will have no adverse impact on the
adjacent properties or the general area.
C.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested tower height variance, as filed.
Board of Adjustment (February 25, 2019)
Mark Rose and Joe White were present, representing the application. There were several
objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval.
Marks Rose addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained that the
proposed height of the tower was planned for long term use of the tower structure. He
noted that there would be no lights on the tower. He explained that the width of the tower
narrowed as the height of the tower increased.
Joe White also spoke in support of the application. He explained that the elevation of the
proposed tower site was 252 feet and that the elevation of the Treetops condo
development was approximately 356 to 360 feet. He further explained that the Treetops
condos owners would look down on and over the proposed tower and not into the tower.
He noted that the proposed tower should not adversely impact the view of the river from
the condos.
Bob McKuin addressed the Board in opposition. He noted that he was opposed to the
tower's close proximity to nearby multi-family developments. He stated that the variance
should be denied.
Bob Ratchford also spoke in opposition. He explained that the tower would impact the
views from his condo. He noted that the tower would devalue his property. He asked
that the application be deferred.
2
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
ITEM NO.: 5 (CON'T.) Z-9392
James Corner also spoke in opposition. He also stated that views from his condo would
be impacted. He noted that towers were not allowed in office zoning and quoted from the
zoning ordinance.
Jack Cherry also spoke in opposition. He asked for a deferral to allow more time for
questions about the tower to be answered.
Dana Carney, of the Planning Staff, explained that towers were accessory uses to
broadcast studios and that towers were permitted in office zoning.
Joe White further explained that the elevation of the top of the tower was less than the
elevation of the Treetops property.
Chairman Allison offered a deferral to the applicant based on the fact that only three (3)
members of the Board were present. Mr. White requested to move forward.
Chairman Allison noted that he had issues that needed to be addressed. Sherri Latimer,
City Attorney, noted that the Board could defer an application on its own motion.
A motion was made to defer the application to the March 25, 2019 agenda. The vote
was 3 ayes, O noes, 1 absent and 1 open position. The application was deferred.
3
KATV
5 0 1 . 3 2 4 . 7 7 7 7 katv.com PO Box 77 Little Rock, AR 72203
January 29, 2019
Mr. Dana Carney
City of Little Rock
Department of Planning and Development
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
RE: 10 Turtle Creek Lane
Zoning variance request
Mr, Carney,
Attached please find the zoning variance application for 10 Turtle Creek Lane. This site is in the Riverdale neighborhood of Little
Rock and is zoned 0-3. We are requesting a variance to the height limit of 75 feet in order to place a 100 foot tall broadcast
tower on the site.
Sinclair Broadcast Group / KATV is in the process of purchasing this property which is currently owned by the Student Loan
Foundation. KATV intends to relocate their broadcast studio operations from their current location at 410 Main Street to the
building at 10 Turtle Creek.
The broadcast signal function of the station has certain requirements that can only be met by the placement of a tower on this
site. Studies have been conducted to determine that the absolute minimum height for a tower at this location is 100 feet. The
proposed tower is a self - supporting truss frame type tower typical to these functions. A 154' tall tower of similar construction is
located at the Signal Media radio station at 2400 Cottondale Lane near the Verizon campus in Riverdale. Drawings and
photographs of the type of tower proposed are attached to this request. The tower structure flnish would be galvanized steel.
A small antenna or dish would be attached to the side of the tower structure near the top but would not extend past the top of
the 100 -foot tower. The height of this tower is below the threshold thatwould require a beacon light at the top, so no light will
be placed.
Given that the tower is critical to provide a broadcast signal and fundamental to station operation, we respectfully request a
variance to the 0-3 height limit of 75 feet to allow this tower height of 100 feet. We believe that the variance Is justified and
will be a benign element in the neighborhood landscape.
Please place this item on the Board of Adjustment docket for the February 25, 2019 meeting. Don't hesitate to call us if you
have any questions or require any additional information.
Thank you,
General Manager
cc: Mr, BIII Russell, Sinclair Broadcast Group
Mr. David Porter, AIA, Principal I CEO
ON YOUR SIDE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VOTE RECORD
DA TE: &�, g5', 1-b L °II I
MEMBER
ALLISON, FRANK
BERTRAM, JAMES
GRINDER, AUSTIN
LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN
Z :, . -----.-' t) f bv foJ1'776r.
TIME IN AND TIME OUT
ALLISON, FRANK
BERTRAM, JAMES
GRINDER, AUSTIN
LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN I I l . ---
-. .-. -..
·t..t....
I Al
,4--r
�:.lfc
CAJ/\ ) �" .,-flfl,Vt.,,A!Z-
j 2 3 q
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ ✓ ✓ v A A A
✓/✓ v1v -
✓AYE __ ·_NAVE __A_ABSENT .f5s3_ ABSTAIN Meeting Adjourned 1. 1
1 (1 P.M.
FEBRUARY 25, 2019
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:57
p.m.
Date:
Chairman Secretary