pc_07 12 2018
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING – REZONING – CONDITIONAL USE HEARING
MINUTE RECORD
JULY 12, 2018
4:00 P.M.
I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being eight (8) in number.
II. Members Present: Craig Berry
Buelah Bynum
Rebecca Finney
Marlon Haynes
Troy Laha
Bill May
Robert Stebbins
Diana Thomas
Members Absent: Keith Cox
Scott Hamilton
Paul Latture
City Attorney: Shawn Overton
III. Approval of the Minutes of the May 31, 2018 Meeting of the Little Rock
Planning Commission. The Minutes were approved as presented.
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING – REZONING – CONDITIONAL USE HEARING
JULY 12, 2018
4:00 P.M.
I. OLD BUSINESS:
Item Number:
File Number:
Title:
A. A Revision of the River Market Design Overlay District (Sec. 36 -350 through
Sec. 36-367).
B. A-332 Kanis Road Deltic-Potlatch Annexation. A request to add
some 180-acres plus or minus along the North side of
Kanis Road, West of Iron Horse Road (generally in the
19600 through 21200 Blocks of Kanis Road) to the City of
Little Rock.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
Item Number:
File Number:
Title:
1. Z-9336 Mercy Ministries – Conditional Use Permit
1900 Nichols Road
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: A
Name: River Market Design Overlay District Revision (Sec. 36 -350 through Sec.
36-367).
Location: An area generally bounded by Riverfront Park, Interstate 30, Second
Street, and Cumberland Street.
Request: Revisions to the River Market Design Overlay District
Source: Staff and River Market Design Review Committee
ANALYSIS:
Staff initiated the process to revise the ordinance in 2016. The impetus of the revision
was the remove all of the instances of the word “prohibited” from the ordinance.
Additionally, Staff routinely keeps track of items that are possible ordinance
amendments. This time was notably sandwich board and projecting signs. These were
added and the Design Review committee added some additional ones. The changes
are combined into five groups. They are editing the word “prohibited”, changes to
internally lit signs, projecting sign changes, sandwich board sign changes and backfill
topsoil requirements.
The changes are combined into five groups. They are editing the word “prohibited”,
changes to internally lit signs, projecting sign changes, sandwich board sign changes
and backfill topsoil requirements.
1) Editing ten instances of the word “prohibited”. When the word “prohibited” is used in
the ordinance, there is technically no way to approve a variance. It must go through
a different longer process. When something is approved by the River Market DRC
that is “prohibited”, for example internally illuminated signs, that item then must go to
the Planning Commission and then to the Board of D irectors for a Planned
Development with the accompanying ordinance written to supersede the River
Market DRC ordinance for only that location and only that particular sign. If the
ordinance was rewritten to allow for a variance, it would be heard at the B oard of
Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment (BOA) meets monthly versus the Planning
Commission/Board of Directors (PC/BOD) that combined take three months or so to
hear a case. The applicant provides a lot less paperwork for a BOA application than
a PC/BOD one. Ten instances of the word “prohibited” are proposed to be removed.
The instances are freestanding signs, internally illuminated signs in the “Signs in
General” subsection, in the “Wall Signs” subsection, on signs that face the Arkansas
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: A (Cont.)
2
River, and internally illuminated signs in the projecting signs section. Additional
times the word “prohibited” is proposed to be removed is in the text of advertising
copy on signs; composition of sandwich boards; tacking of flyers, balloons and
streamers on sandwich boards; back lit awnings; and chain link, barbed or razor wire
fences.
The word “prohibited” remains in not allowing Physical or chemical treatments, such
as sandblasting or high pressure water cleaning, that cause damage to historic
materials. It also remains concerning additional curb cuts on President Clinton Ave.
These two items were discussed but the Committee believes they should require the
higher level of review of rezoning the property if one of these items were sought.
2) Proposed change of prohibition on internally lit signs. The Design Review
Committee created an exception if the sign utilizes channel or channelume
technology. This technology creates custom shaped signs instead of the cabinet or
box sign that is standard. Signs may be the shapes of letters, logos, or other custom
shapes. This is located in the “Signs in General” subsection and the “wall sign”
subsection.
3) The projecting sign section has four proposed changes; one is to allow for the signs
to be mounted higher on the building than before. Currently the top of the projecting
sign cannot be higher than the bottom sill of the second floor window. The proposal
is to change to the top sill of the second floor window or the ceiling of the second
floor whichever, is less.
Also proposed is changing the distance from the building a projecting sign can be
from three to four feet. The overall size has not changed. Another change proposed
is to change the frequency of projecting signs from one every 100 feet of building to
one every 50 feet. The last change proposed is to require businesses share
mounting apparatus of projecting sign when sharing an entrance to a building to
reduce clutter.
The current ordinance treats projecting signs on a first come first served on a per
block basis. This will allow additional businesses the opportunity to have a projecting
sign without an additional public hearings (Board of Adjustment). If businesses
share a common entry to the street, for example, second floor offices, they would be
required to share a mounting apparatus at the shared entrance door. This will help
to eliminate projecting signs being too close together to render them unreadable.
4) The sandwich board sign section has six proposed changes; adding a definition, text
to clarify intent, adding height to the signs, allowing plastic molded signs, eliminating
signs that are trip hazards, and chalkboards and dry erase boards.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: A (Cont.)
3
Proposing to add a definition of sandwich board signs. This did not appear
anywhere in the ordinance. River Market DOD is the only district where sandwich
boards are legally permitted. More additional text is being added to clarify intent of
sandwich board signs in the district. This text under Sec, 36 -353 (f) provides
rationale for the use of the signs in the district and sets parameters. Additional
height to sandwich board signs from thirty six inches to forty five inches is being
sought to conform to industry standards of size. Allowing for molded plastic
sandwich board sign as long as they are bla ck in color will allow for ease or
replacing worn or damaged signs. Light colored plastic signs are apt to be appear
dirty and unkempt. Some design of sandwich board build in tripping hazards,
notably those certain models that have feet (horizontal membe rs that extend past
the bottom of the sign. The last proposed change clarified chalkboards and dry
erase boards on sandwich board signs. White dry erase boards are apt to present a
grimy appearance.
5) In two places, the proposed changes edited the text on the tree planting strip backfill
to allow for engineered soil to help prevent uneven settling of the brick pavers.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 8, 2018)
The item was approved on the consent agenda for deferral to the April 19, 2018 agenda
by a vote of 9 ayes and 2 absent.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (APRIL 19, 2018)
Staff recommends approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 19, 2018)
The item was approved on the consent agenda for deferral by a vote of 8 ayes and
3 absent.
STAFF UPDATE:
On April 9, 2019, Planning Staff was informed that the trees along President Clinton
Avenue were being planned to be replaced with a different species of trees. This
change of tree species will require the ordinance to be revised. After meetings between
the Parks and Recreation Staff, Planning and Development Staff, City Manager’s office,
and the River Market Design Review Committee, it was decided that it would be best to
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: A (Cont.)
4
add the new tree species to the ordinance package and present one ordinance revis ion
to the City Board of Directors. That species will be reviewed by the River Market
Design Review Committee on June 12, 2018.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Deferral to the July 12, 2018 agenda.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 31, 2018)
The item was approved on the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12, 2018 agenda
by a vote of 9 ayes and 2 absent.
STAFF UPDATE:
On June 12, 2018, The River Market Design Review Committee reviewed the street tree
amendment at their regularly scheduled meeting. After a presentation by Parks and
Recreation Staff, discussion between commissioners, and input from citizens, the DRC
voted unanimously to approve the motion to replace all of the Autumn Blaze maples in
the district with Gingko trees. The motion passed 5 ayes, 0 noes, and 0 absent.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 12, 2018)
Brian Minyard, Staff, made a presentation to the Commission about the item. He also
spoke of the process that was taken and notifications of pro perty and business owners
in the district. He stated that the River Market Design Review Committee had voted to
approve all of the changes proposed.
Jo Melton, property owner in the district, spoke about the possibility of replacing only the
diseased trees. She stated that the trees in the 300 block of President Clinton, where
her property lies, are healthier than the other parts of the street and suggested that the
trees not be replaced on the 300 block.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: A (Cont.)
5
John Eckart, Director of Parks and Recreation, introduced Robbie Hudson, the Urban
Forrester and Ernie Moix, a Horticulturalist, from his department. They spoke of the
number of trees that were missing, those in bad health versus the total number of maple
trees. They said that the Autumn Blaze Maple ha s proven not to be suitable as a street
tree and should be replaced with a different type of tree. Mr. Hudson said that for the
last twelve years, they have been wrapping the trunks of the trees in an effort to protect
the trees, but the damage continues to occur and makes the trees structurally unsound.
The proposed Gingko trees are a stronger tree.
Mr. Eckart said that the trees would be replaced overnight with less traffic congestion
and minimal intrusion to the businesses.
Craig Berry, Chair, asked how many trees would be replaced at one time. The
response was that it would be more cost effective to replace all 59 at the same time.
Mr. Moix stated that the size and height of the replacement tree is dependent on the
size of the four by four foot planting hole. Mr. Eckart said that it would be an adjustment
for the first couple of year with the smaller trees, but the Gingkoes are a sustainable
tree.
Commissioner Diane Thomas asked about the number of trees. Mr. Moix said that part
of the number of trees in the original bid was for trees in the plaza areas. He said that
59 are on President Clinton Avenue.
Discussion continued about the aesthetics of having all trees replaced at the same time
so that they will be a uniform height versus replacing the trees at different times
resulting in different heights and two different species at one time on the street.
Commissioner Finney made a motion to approve the item and was seconded by
Commissioner Bill May. The item passed with 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.
Jo Melton spoke to the Commission in the Citizen Communication section of the hearing
recommending that the City be aware of the public opinion of replacement of the trees
and any possible bad press that could occur.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: B FILE NO.: A-332
NAME: Kanis Road-DelticPotlatch Annexation
REQUEST: Accept 180 acres plus or minus to the City
LOCATION: Along the north side of Kanis Road, west of Iron Horse Road
(19600-21200 Blocks of Kanis Road)
SOURCE: Tim Daters, White Daters agent
Staff Report:
Staff needs additional time to review and consider this request.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends this item be deferred to July 12, 2018.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 28, 2018)
The item was placed on consent agenda for Deferral to the July 12, 2018
Planning Commission Hearing. By vote of 9 for, 0 against, 1 recusal and
1 absent the consent agenda was approved.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The County Judge’s Annexation Order was filed on May 4, 2018.
The area is wooded and undeveloped with two ridge lines traversing
portions of the area.
There is a single property owner of the area requesting annexation.
The annexation request includes two areas. The larger area is contiguous
to the City of Little Rock along its north boundary. The smaller area is
contiguous along its eastern boundary.
The annexation request is to obtain City services.
The larger site is some 3900 plus or minus feet east-west, with a frontage
along Kanis Road of over 4200 feet. At the eastern boundary the site is
some 1600 feet deep and at the western some 1350 feet deep. The
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO. : B (Cont.) FILE NO. A-332
2
smaller site is a Quarter-Quarter Section (SW1/4 NW1/4 of Section 34)
with no direct access to any street or road.
The entire site is zoned for R-2, Single-Family Residential District. No
development plan has been presented for review. At one lot per-7000
square feet that would produce 1120 new houses.
AGENCY COMMENTS:
Public Safety:
Fire: No Impact. West Pulaski Fire Protection District (current provider)
recommends against the annexation. They state they have the correct
equipment to fight fires on undeveloped land like this, and that even if developed
they can provide the services without affecting their ISO rating. They have the
fire stations to service the area.
Police: No Impact.
Infrastructure and Community Facilities:
Rock Region METRO Transit: No Comment Received.
Parks and Recreation: No Comment Received.
Public Works: Little Rock Solid Waste has indicated they have no concerns or
issues with that requested annexation. Little Rock Public Works Department has
indicated they have no issues or comments on the proposed annexation.
Pulaski County Planning: Pulaski County Planning has indicated they have no
issues or concerns with the proposed annexation.
Arkansas Geographic Information Office: AGIO expressed no concerns with the
annexation and noted the applicant had followed ARK CODE 14 -40-101.
Utilities:
Central Arkansas Water (CAW): No Comment Received.
Entergy: Entergy has indicated they have no issues or concerns with the
proposed annexation.
Reliant-Energy: No Comment Received.
Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority (LRWRA): The Little Rock Reclamation
Authority indicated they expect, based on previous activities, a viable plan for
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO. : B (Cont.) FILE NO. A-332
3
sewering the area will be submitted prior to development. The Developer will
also have to confirm available capacity in the receiving system. If pumping is
part of the plan of service approval will have to be obtained from the Water
Reclamation Commission.
AT&T: No Comment Received.
Schools:
Little Rock: No Comment Received.
The annexation area is not within the Little Rock School District.
Pulaski County Special: No Comment Received.
The annexation area is within the Pulaski County Special School District.
ANALYSIS:
The two areas included in this request are both contiguous to the City along the
boundary created in 1999 with annexation 292, ordinance number 18,146. The
larger area is contiguous along its northern boundary and would move the City
Limits some 1600 to 1350 feet to the south, along Kanis Road. The smaller area
would move west of the current City Limits some 1300 plus feet. The smaller
area is a Quarter-Quarter Section some 40 acres plus or minus and the larger
area is some 140 areas more or less.
The area requesting annexation is wooded and undeveloped. There is a ridge
line running parallel with Kanis Road. The peeks of the ridge are some 60 feet
above the roadway at elevations from 624 to 630 feet with the valley floors in the
low five hundreds. This 60 to 100 foot elevation change occurs over a distance
of some 275 feet. The valley north of the ridge is even deeper than many spots
along Kanis Road. This valley is the head waters of a tributary of Fletcher Creek.
The area drains to the west northwest between ridge lines.
All of the land is currently zoned R-2, Single-Family which has a minimum lot size
of 7000 square feet. There is one property owner currently and they have no
submitted any specific development plans for the land. This owner is currently
developing a single-family subdivision within the city adjacent to this site at a
density of some 3.5 lots per acre.
Along the south side of Kanis Road adjacent to the annexation area (and
beyond the current and proposed city limits) is the Chenal Downs Subdivision.
This subdivision is mostly developed with just a scattering of undeveloped
single-family tracts. The parcels in this subdivision are all over five acres in
area. To the east along both sides of Kanis Road is primarily developed with
larger tracts and is un-incorporated county. Most of the tracts have residential
and accessory structures on them. To the west is larger wooded undeveloped
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO. : B (Cont.) FILE NO. A-332
4
land along either side of Kanis Road. This portion of Kanis Road is often referred
to as Fletcher Hollow and has ridges along both sides of the road.
The county review has found that the annexation area meets all the requirements
for annexation – is contiguous, petitioners represent majority of the land to be
annexed, the land will be used for an urban purpose and the documents filed are
correct and accurate representations of the area. The Pulaski County Judge in
his Annexation Order has included all public streets and right-of-way abutting the
annexation area. This would include the right-of-way Kanis Road. The City’s
annexation ordinance will be in conformance with the Pulaski County Judge’s
Order and include adjacent street rights-of-way into the City of Little Rock.
The request would add some 4300 linear feet of Kanis Road to the City of Little
Rock for maintenance. Kanis Road is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master
Street Plan with an alternative design standard. The right -of-way is to be 90 feet
but the lane design is to be 22-feet of pavement with two 4-foot gravel shoulders.
The current road is not to the alternative standards. The closest portion of Kanis
Road currently within the City’s jurisdiction is over a mile to the east. So this
annexation will create another ‘in-out’ along Kanis Road.
Little Rock Solid Waste has indicated they have no issues with the annexation as
proposed. There will be no structures, i.e. no demand, when the area is annexed
to the City. (Fees for solid waste pickup are designed to meet the costs of
providing the services.) The Little Rock Public works Department has indicated
they have no issues and concerns with the proposed annexation. This is the
Department that will become responsible for maintenance and f uture road
improvements to over 4000 linear feet of Kanis Road as a result of this
annexation.
The closest fire station (Station 19) is located at 17000 Chenal Valley Drive.
From this station via existing streets is just approximately 2.7 miles to the
annexation area. Station 20 located at 300 Oak Meadow Drive, is the next
closest station with runs of approximately 3.9 miles to the annexation area.
West Pulaski Fire Protection District (current provider) recommends against the
annexation. They state that they have the correct equipment to fight fires on
undeveloped land like this, and that even when if the land is developed they can
provide the services without affecting their ISO rating. They have the fire stations
to service the area. No impact to Police and Fire with the annexation.
There is a 12-inch water main close to the eastern boundary of the annexation
area. Any new development would have to have service extended from this line
at the cost of the developer. There is no wastewater line in the area.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO. : B (Cont.) FILE NO. A-332
5
Staff Recommendation:
Approval
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 12, 2018)
The item was place on consent agenda for approval. By a vote of 6 for, 0 against,
4 absent and 1 recusal, the consent agenda was approved.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: 1 FILE NO.: Z-9336
NAME: Mercy Ministries – Conditional Use Permit
LOCATION: 1900 Nichols Road
OWNER/APPLICANT: Mercy Ministries, Owner and Applicant
PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow for
the addition of small building to be used for classroom
space for this existing church. The property is
zoned R-2.
1. SITE LOCATION:
The site is located on the west side of the 1900 Block of Nichols Road;
one block west of Jr. Deputy – Romine Road.
2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD:
The church is located in a residential neighborhood. The surrounding
properties are occupied by single-family and two-family residences. It
appears that a church has occupied this property for many years. This
congregation has occupied the property since 2005. No increase in the
sanctuary building or parking is being proposed. The property occupied
by the church is not being expanded. Allowing the placement of the small
classroom building on the property should not affect the church’s
continued compatibility with the neighborhood.
Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located
within 200 feet of the site and the John Barrow, Twin Lakes and Twin
Lakes “B” Neighborhood Associations.
3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING:
The site contains a gravel parking lot with one paved driveway onto
Nichols Road. It appears that there is space for 20 – 25 vehicles. The
applicant states the seating capacity in the sanctuary is 90 persons with
an average attendance of 50. Parking required for a church existing prior
to November 2, 1988 is one parking space per five seats. 18 spaces are
required. No change to the existing parking is proposed.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9336
2
4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS:
Any new site development must comply with the City’s minimal landscape
and buffer ordinance requirements.
The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing
trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper
or larger.
5. PUBLIC WORKS:
1. Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plan
specifies that Nichols Street for the frontage of this property must meet
commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 25 feet from
centerline due to the proposed class room addition.
2. With site development beyond the proposed classroom building with
this application, provide design of the street conforming to the Master
Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Nichols Street
including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development.
6. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/BUILDING CODES:
Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: Sewer is available to this
property.
Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. However, a se rvice line
feeding a private area light appears to run from a pole on Nichols Road to
the back of the property in the same vicinity as the proposed building. The
proposed structure should not be built under the service line and all NESC
and OSHA required separation distances must be maintained during and
after construction. Service is already provided via an overhead service line
to the north side of the existing structure on the property. Contact Entergy
in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to
existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds.
Centerpoint Energy: No comments received.
AT&T: No comments received.
Central Arkansas Water: No objection
Fire Department: No comment.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9336
3
Building Codes: Project is subject to full commercial plan review and
approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on
submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial
plans examiner:
Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey@littlerock.gov
Anchoring Plan as well as building manufacturers plans/specifications
required.
7. TRANSPORTATION/PLANNING:
County Planning: No comments received.
Rock Region METRO: The nearest bus route is located along Kanis
Road, seven blocks north of this site.
Planning Division: No comments.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JUNE 20, 2018)
The applicants were present. Staff presented the item and noted little additional
information was needed. In response to questions from staff, the applicants
stated there would be no changes in signage, no daycare or private school and
the days and hours of operation were as typical for a small church; Sundays and
Wednesdays with an occasional activity on other days.
Public Works Comments were discussed and explained.
Other Agency Comments were noted.
The committee determined there were no outstanding issues and forwarded the
item to the full Commission.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Mercy Ministries Church is located on the R-2 zoned property located at 1900
Nichols Road. The property consists of 3 lots in Block 11 of the Hick’s Interurban
Addition. The property contains a small church building, a storage building and a
gravel parking lot. The church building is one-story with a finished basement.
The seating capacity in the worship area is about 90 persons with the church’s
average attendance being about 50.
July 12, 2018
ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9336
4
Mercy Ministries has occupied the site since 2005. Other churches occupied the
site in the previous years. Mercy Ministries is requesting approval of a
conditional use permit to allow for placement of a 16’ X 40’ building on the
property to be used for Sunday School – bible study classroom space. No other
change is proposed to the site. The occupancy of the site by various churches
pre-dates the code requirement of a conditional use permit.
Staff is supportive of the requested CUP which recognizes the property’s use for
a church and which allows for placement of the small classroom building. No
expansion of the main church building or the Sanctuary’s seating capacity is
proposed. Thus, staff is supportive of continued use of the existing gravel
parking lot. The church has agreed to the dedication of additional right -of-way for
Nichols Road as noted in Public Works’ Comments.
To staff’s knowledge, there are no outstanding issues. The 1913 plat/bill of
assurance for Hick’s Interurban Addition does not address use issues.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to compliance
with the comments and conditions outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda
staff report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 12, 2018)
The applicants were present. There were no objectors present. Staff
presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff
recommendation” above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed
on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all
staff comments, conditions and recommendation. The vote was 6 ayes, 0 noes,
4 absent and 1 recusal (Laha).
DATE�t
PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE RECORD
U ZAk
MEMBER
BERRY, CRAIG
BYNUM, BUELAH
COX, KEITH
FINNEY, REBECCA
HAMILTON, SCOTT
HAYNES, MARLON D.
LAHA, TROY
LATTU RE, PAUL
MAY, BILL B.
STEBBINS, ROBERT
THOMAS, DIANA M.
_r
Meeting Adjourned P.M.
''AYE ® NAYE A ABSENT ,ABSTAIN $RECUSE
R R
HAMILTON, SCOTT
LATTURE, PAUL
:STEBBINS, ROBERT
THOMAS, DIANA M.
MEMBER
BERRY, CRAIG
BYNUM, BUELAH
COX, KEITH
FINNEY, REBECCA
HAMILTON, SCOTT
HAYNES, MARLON D.
LAHA, TROY
LATTU RE, PAUL
MAY, BILL B.
STEBBINS, ROBERT
THOMAS, DIANA M.
_r
Meeting Adjourned P.M.
''AYE ® NAYE A ABSENT ,ABSTAIN $RECUSE
July 12, 2018
There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting
was adjourned at 4:23 p.m.
Date
Secretary Chairman