Loading...
HDC_07 11 1996LITTLE ROCK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES 11 July 1996 Commissioners Present: John Bush Tommy Jameson Carl Menyhart Julie Wiedower Commissioners Absent: Bob Roddey Staff Present: Anthony Black V.Anne Guthrie The roll for the Little Rock Historic District Commission (LRHDC) was called, and there was a quorum; the minutes of the previous meetings were approved. The first agenda item was Richard Butler's application for a certificate of appropriateness (COA) for 419 East 10th Street; as Commissioner Tommy Jameson was project architect, he excused himself from the subsequent discussion and decision of the agenda item. Butler presented his application to the LRHDC and reviewed the project's background, such as his purchase of the property and the events that led to his being fined by the environmental court. Butler also discussed the proposed plans for the structure's rehabilitation and the research that had been done on the structure; he stated that after the rehab and tax credit work perhaps the house would be changed from a noncontributing to contributing structure, as stated in the National Register nomination and documented in the district's architectural survey. He introduced Averell Tate, a Little Rock resident who knows a great deal about the city's architectural history; she confirmed that the proposed plans reflect her memory of the house between 1904 -1924. Lynn Zollner, of the Arkansas Historic Preservation Office, stated that Tate's testimony would assist in getting the structure listed as contributing after the rehab work. Judy Gardner, representing the Parkplace condominium across the street from the applicant's, stated that she was not opposed to the structure's renovation, but it had been in a poor condition for the past four years. She asked that if the LRHDC approved Butler's application, would it be possible to establish a time frame in which the proposed rehab work is to be performed. There was discussion about setting a time frame, and Anthony Black stated that a COA may be issued with conditions. Commissioner Julie Wiedower made a motion that the COA be approved with a condition that an application for a building permit be made within ninety (90) days of the LRHDC's approval. Commissioner Carl Menyhart seconded the motion; a vote was taken, and it was unanimous that the COA be conditionally approved (NOTE: the ninety-day condition period expires October 9). The second agenda item was the COA application for the fire station's rehabilitation at 524 East Ninth Street. Architect Don Renshaw presented the proposed rehabilitation of the station and explained the project's scope; the rehab work increases the density of the fire station by going from one to two-story and increasing the number of bays from two to five, while staying within the building's footprint. Renshaw presented graphics of a street perspective of the structure's elevation alongside adjacent buildings. The plan is a two-storied structure of red brick with a metal-seamed roof. The bays are retained along the structure's south elevation with paned-doors for the bay openings. The windows on the second story are reminiscent of the Craftsman style, with a nine-paned sash over a single-sash. Handicapped accessibility is provided on the east elevation. The plans were reviewed by the Quapaw Quarter Association and the Arkansas Historic Preservation Office, both of which were complimentary of the architectural style of the rehabilitated fire station fitting into the historic district in a sympathetic fashion. A property owner to the north of the fire station stated that he was interested in the north facade of the structure in terms of massing, openings, etc. There was discussion about the existing outbuilding on the northwest comer and whether it would remain; it was explained that the outbuilding would remain at its existing site but with a new roof. The chain link fence along the property's perimeter (approximately 150 linear feet) was discussed, and it was stated that since the total project is approximately one million dollars, a new and different type of fence is warranted. Renshaw stated that the agreement between his office and the city manager's was to deal only with the structure. After the fencing discussion, Jameson made a motion to approve the fire station's application for a certificate of appropriateness (COA) on the condition that the chain link fence be replaced with a more compatible material and to have the approval of the LRHDC. A vote was taken and the motion was passed unanimously. The third agenda item was the COA application for the rehabilitation of Kramer School at 7th and Sherman Streets into studio spaces and apartments. Paul Esterer explained the project, which is a joint effort between the City of Little Rock (who owns the property) and the Historic Investment Solutions Team, who has an option to purchase the property. The Kramer School Artist Cooperative "represents the acquisition, rehabilitation and reconfiguration" of the structure into twenty-two (22) affordable apartment units for area artists. The Cooperative will provide community activities to serve the artists and art organizations, which in tum fosters both community and economic growth, revitalization and development. The auditorium provides space for community performances, meetings and exhibition space. 2 This joint housing and rehabilitation efforts is proposed by the development team of the Downtown Little Rock Community Development Corporation (DLRCDC) and the Historic Investment Solution Team (HIST); it represents a joint venture agreement between non-profit and private organizations. The Kramer School is an historic structure, circa 1895, designed by architect Thomas Harding; it is one of the city's few extant Romanesque revival style structures. The estimated cost for rehabilitation is $2,950,000, with construction slated for October. Funding for the project is from various resources, as the federal low-income housing and historic restoration tax credit programs, an affordable housing loan and several other grants and "creative financing instruments." The LRHDC reviewed the plans and discussed issues such as the interior and exhibit spaces, parking and fencing. While the presented plans depicted a fence along the property's perimeter, it was deleted from the final drawings. The project requires a conditional use permit. Menyhart made a motion that the COA application be approved (without the perimeter fence) and with approval of the exterior lighting. A vote was taken, and the motion was approved unanimously. As there was no further business, the LRHDC adjourned at 6:20 p.m. 3