Loading...
HDC_04 07 1994MINUTES LITTLE ROCK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 7, 1994 5:00 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Bush. A quorum was present - Mr. Carl Menyhart, Ms. Julie Wiedower, Ms. Jeanette Heinbockel, Mr. Bob Roddey and Mr. John Bush. City Attorney Anthony Black was present. Item No. 1 - Owner: Joe and Sheila Kuonen Location: 407 East 14th Street Request: Install fence Mr. Joe Kuonen was present and explained his application to install a 4 1/2 foot picket fence in the front yard of his rental property at 407 East 14th Street. Mr. Kuonen wants the fence installed for both privacy and security. He explained that although the fence would not keep anyone from jumping over or climbing the fence, it would serve as a deterrent. Mr. Kuonen stated that he would eventually paint the fence. Asm Mr. Kuonen stated that expense was an issue in this project and that was a determining factor in the design. Mr. Kuonen amended his application from a 4 foot 4 inch fence to a 4 foot high fence. Argie Austin, a neighbor at the corner of 14th and Commerce Streets, spoke in favor of Mr. Kuonen's application to install a fence. The State Historic Preservation Program presented a letter in favor of the application. Commissioner Heinbockel made a motion to approve the application as amended to a height of 4 feet. Commissioner Wiedower seconded. The vote was taken. Motion carried. All ayes. 0 noes. Item No. 2 - Owner: City of Little Rock, Code Enforcement Division - Jack Patton, Agent Location: 1410 and 1416 Commerce Streets Request: Demolition Mr. Jack Patton, City of Little Rock Senior Code Enforcement Officer, explained the application and presented photographs of the properties. Mr. Patton stated that notification was handled properly. Mr. James Allen, owner or co -owner of property at 1410 Commerce was ..dw _ present and stated that he had received notice of the public hearing on the previous Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. He also stated that he did not have time to consult with an attorney. 1 Mr. Allen said that the property burned in February and his insurance claim has been held up. Mr. Allen stated that he wants the main structure razed, but he does not want the rear structure torn down. Mr. Patton clarified for the Commission that the application is for demolition of all structures at this property location. Mr. Patton explained that the property had been declared unsafe and that the City wants to proceed with demolition of both structures at 1410 Commerce Street, as well as, the structure at 1416 Commerce Street. Mr. Patton stated that there is perhaps some hope for repair to the rear structure, a garage apartment, at 1410 Commerce Street. Mr. Pullum, co-owner of property at 1410 Commerce Street, was present. Chairman Bush stated that the property owner /owners could work with Code Enforcement as far as the garage apartment perhaps being repaired, but stated that the City's application is for demolition of all structures on that parcel, and approval of this application does not mean that the rear structure has to come down. Mrs. Argie Austin, owner and resident of 1402 Commerce Street since 1963, was present and addressed the Commission. Mrs. Austin stated that 1410 Commerce had been declared a drug nuisance and she appealed to the Commission to allow demolition of the structures. Mrs. Austin's garage is attached to the garage apartments at 1410 Commerce. Mrs. Austin offered her part of the garage to come down also. Mr. Chess, owner of property at 1409 Commerce Street directly across the street from 1410 Commerce, attested to drug activity at 1410 Commerce Street. Mr. Joe Kuonen, an adjacent property owner for 8 years, stated that the property at 1410 Commerce was poorly maintained and that he witnessed drug activity there. Mr. Kuonen stated that 1410 Commerce adversely affects his property value and appealed to the Commission for demolition. Mr. Allen expressed confusion at to what a desirable renter is. Commissioner Heinbockel made a motion to approve the application to demolish both (all) structures at 1410 Commerce Street. Commissioner Weidower seconded. The vote was taken. Motion carried. All ayes. 0 noes. 2 A petition signed by neighborhood property owners and residents asking for demolition at 1410 and 1416 Commerce was presented to the Commission. Mr. Patton explained that 1416 Commerce Street had been vacant for at least 5 years and had been declared unsafe. Letters from the Quapaw Quarter Association and the State Historic Preservation state that these agencies do not object to demolition of the structures. A lengthy discussion followed. Commissioner Roddey made a motion to approve the application for demolition of 1416 Commerce Street. Commissioner Wiedower seconded. The vote was taken. Motion carried. 3 ayes. 1 no. Commissioner Heinbockel made a motion for the meeting to be adjourned. Commissioner Menyhart seconded. The vote was taken. Motion carried. All ayes. There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned. 3