pc_03 24 1987LITTLE ROCK PL ANNING COMMISSION
MINUTE RECORD
MARCH 24, 1987
1:00 P.M.
I.Ro ll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being eight in number.
II.Approval .of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting
The minutes were ap proved as mailed.
III.Members Present:
Members Abs ent:
City Attorney:
Bill Rector Betty Sipes Rose Collins Jerilyn Nicholson Dorothy Arnett John Schlereth Fred Perkins Walter Riddick III David Jones (Item 6)
Wil liam Ketcher Richard Massie
Steven Giles
March 24, 1987
Item No. A - Z -4791
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
George W. and Dorthea Davis
Virgil W. Young, Jr.
Gamble Road, Two Blocks North of
Kanis
Rezone from "R -2" to "C -3"
Mixed Uses
2.7 acres
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "R -2"
South - Vacant, Zoned "R -2"
East - Vacant, Zoned "R -2"
West - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R -2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to rezone one block in the Gilbralter
Heights Addition from "R -2" to "C -3" for an office and
some other unspecified uses. The property is located
two blocks north of Kanis Road and in an area that is
still primarily residential. The zoning is "R -2" with
some multifamily land along Kanis Road to the
southeast. To the east there are two well established
subdivisions, and to the north there are a number of
existing single family residences with some additional
ones under construction. Also, to the west of Nix Road
there are some new subdivisions being platted so it
appears that the area is desirable for single family
development. In the immediate vicinity, the blocks are
primarily vacant with several single family residences
located on some of the lots. At the northwest corner
of Gamble and Kanis Road, there is a nonconforming
junkyard that involves a substantial piece of land and
is very unsightly. The future status of this use is
unknown at this time, but the facility will probably
have to be phased out because of the emerging trend
towards the area becoming an attractive residential
location.
March 24, 1987
Item No. A - Continued
2. The property is vacant and some removal of trees has
taken place.
3. Gamble Road is classified as a collector and a survey
reflects a 60 -foot right -of -way which is usually
adequate for a collector.
4. Engineering reports that:
. Stormwater detention will be required on -site.
. Site access for traffic and parking layout shall be
approved by the traffic engineer before any permits
are issued.
. Boundary street improvements will be required on all
four sides.
. Right -of -way dedication will be required.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented history on the site. Staff has
received several calls in opposition to the rezoning.
7. The recently adopted Extraterritorial Land Use Plan for
the Upper Rock Creek area recommends continued single
family use for the property in question, and staff is
opposed to the commercial request. The rezoning, if
granted, could have a very adverse impact on the area
and establish a commercial spot zoning which could harm
the existing positive development pattern. The plan
identifies more suitable areas for nonresidential uses
and those locations should be reinforced by not
supporting this proposal.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the "C -3" request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (2- 10 -87)
The applicant was represented by Steve Barry. There were
several objectors in attendance. Staff informed the
Commission that the required notices to the property owners
had not been mailed as set out in the Bylaws. Mr. Barry
discussed the problem with the notification and requested
that the item be deferred. A motion was made to defer the
request to the March 24, 1987, meeting. The motion was
approved by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent, and
1 abstention (Rose Collins).
March 24, 1987
Item No. A - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSIOR ACTION: (3- 24 -87)
The applicant was not present. There were eight to ten
interested residents in attendance. Staff reported that the
applicant had submitted a letter requesting that the item be
withdrawn from consideration. After some discussion, a
motion was made to withdraw the "C -3" rezoning request. The
motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3
absent. (The owner cannot file a "C -3" request for a period
of one year because of this action).
March 24, 1987
Item No. 1 - Z- 2534 -A
Owner: Hardman & Ketchum
(A General Partnership)
Applicant: Wendell Ketchum
Location: 1314 Booker Street
Request: Rezone from "R -4" to "R -5"
Purpose: Multifamily /Four Units
Size: 0.28 acres
Existing Use: Residential
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Single Family, Zoned "R -3"
South - Single Family, Zoned "R -3"
East - Single Family, Zoned "R -3"
West - Single Family, Zoned "R -3"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The request is to rezone the northwest corner of Booker
and West 14th from "R -4" to "R -5." The proposal is to
have a total of four units in two separate structures
that are on the site. The principal building will have
three units, and there will be a garage apartment
located at the northwest corner of the lot. The zoning
pattern in the area is mixed with "R -3," 11R -4," "R -5,"
"0-3" and "C -3." Land use is primarily single family
in the immediate area with nonresidential uses found
along Woodrow Street. There are also duplexes and
several nonconforming multifamily structures to the
west on West 13th and West 14th. The neighborhood has
experienced some land use changes over the years, and
it appears that the proposed reclassification will not
create any new problems for the area. (This issue is
before the Planning Commission as a result of some
miscommunication between the applicant and the City.)
At some point during the permitting process, the
applicant was informed that the property was zoned for
a triplex or three units, and the owner started a
remodeling project based on that information. When the
owner attempted to get three meters for the units, he
was told that he could only have two meters because of
the "R -4" zoning which only permits duplexes.)
March 24, 1987
Item No. 1 - Continued
2. The site is two lots, 12,320 square feet, with two
structures on it. Also, there are some paved areas for
driveways and parking.
3. There are no right -of -way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues associated with this request.
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. The property was rezoned to "R -4" (C) in 1971 for a
day -care center. Prior to that, the structure had been
used for a duplex with a detached unit. There is no
documented neighborhood position.
7. Staff's position is that four units is a reasonable use
of the property and supports the "R -5"
reclassification. Because of the two lots, there is
adequate land area for both liveability and to provide
the necessary parking. The four units is below the
maximum number of units allowed on the property based
on its size and the required land area per dwelling
unit. The Zoning Ordinance now sets out standards for
land area, and the requirement for this request is
2,000 square feet per dwelling unit, so with the 12,300
square feet of land, there could be a maximum of six
units on the property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the "R -5" request as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, Wendell Ketchum, was present. There were no
objectors. Mr. Ketchum discussed the rehabilitation of the
structure and the misunderstanding between himself and the
City. He said that when he first started talking to the
City he probably forgot to mention that the property had two
structures on it with a total of three units instead of
explaining that he wanted three units in the main structure.
Mr. Ketchum felt that the confusion was due to his lack of
describing the existing situation correctly. He went on to
say that all the work had been completed and that he had no
intention of going to six units because of not being able to
provide the necessary parking. There were additional
comments made by Mr. Ketchum and several of the
Commissioners. A motion was made to recommend approval of
the "R -5" rezoning. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes,
0 noes, and 3 absent.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 2 - Z- 2727 -C
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Red Lobster
Gerald K. Richards
8407 West Markham (Front Portion)
Rezone from "0-3" to 11C -3"
Parking
0.25 acres
Parking
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North -
Post Office,
Zoned
"C -3"
South -
Commercial,
Zoned
"C -3"
East
- Commercial,
Zoned
"C -3"
West
- Commercial,
Zoned
"C -3"
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The request is to rezone the site in question from "0-3" to
"C -3" to allow the placement of a new sign for the Red
Lobster restaurant. The property is currently used as
parking for the restaurant, and it is anticipated that use
will not change. The building is situated to the south and
that portion of the tract is zoned "C -3." Uses in the
immediate vicinity are commercial with some offices to the
southeast and a post office facility across Rodney Parham.
The site abuts "C -3" on all sides and the proposed
reclassification should not create any adverse impacts for
the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the "C -3" request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. A
motion was made to recommend approval of the "C -3" rezoning.
The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 3 - Z- 3269 -A
Owner: Woodland Hills Limited Partnership
Applicant: Maury Mitchell
Location: Mara Lynn Road
(West of Green Mountain Drive)
Request: Rezone from "MF -18" to 110 -1"
Purpose: Day -Care Center
Size: 1.69 acres
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Single Family, Zoned PUD
South - Multifamily, Zoned "MF -24"
East - Multifamily, Zoned "R -5" and "R -6"
West - Single Family, Zoned PUD
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to rezone the site 1.7 acres from
"MF -18" to "O -1" to permit a day -care center. The
property is located on Mara Lynn and adjacent to
several residential developments. To the west, there
is a single family subdivision and to the east, there
is a large condominium project. Across Mara Lynn,
there are a large number of multifamily units. The
zoning of these locations is PUD, "MF -24 ", "R -5" and
"R -6." In the general area, there is also some "C -3"
land where Bowman Road intersects Mara Lynn, but it is
all located on the south side of Mara Lynn. That area
is just beginning to develop because of the recent
completion of the Bowman Road extension. At the corner
of Mara Lynn and Bowman, there is a new convenience
store and the remaining tracks are vacant.
2. The property is vacant and wooded. The most unique
feature of the site is its topography which increases
in elevation from 460 along the southwest side to 550
at the northeast corner.
3. There are no right -of -way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues associated with this request.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 3 - Continued
4. Engineering reports:
(1) Boundary street improvements should be completed
if not already in the field.
(2) No parking is allowed on the street.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented neighborhood position. The
property was rezoned to "MF -18" several years ago.
7. Staff's position is that a rezoning change is not
required for the proposed use and does not support the
"0 -1" reclassification. In a majority of the
residential districts, a day -care center is a
conditional use and staff feels that is the process
that should be utilized for this particular location.
A conditional use permit requires a site plan for
development which would be very beneficial because of
the property's terrain and its relationship to the
adjacent residential areas. The property has some
potential development problems and the site plan review
would ensure a workable project and lessen the impact
on the neighborhood. The new Extraterritorial Land Use
Plan does not go east of Napa Valley Road, but the
Suburban Development Plan of 1980 recommended
residential uses only for the north side of Mara Lynn
Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the "O -1" request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, Claude Brasseale of the Danny Thomas Company,
was present. There were three objectors in attendance.
Mr. Brasseale described the site and said approximately 30
units could be built on the property with the current
zoning. He went on to say that his company had no
intentions of developing multifamily units and said that
there was more interest in the property because of the
completion of the Bowman Road extension. Mr. Brasseale
reviewed the "O -1" district criteria and said "O -1" was
needed because in addition to the day -care facility, an
office was also being proposed. He presented some graphics
including a site plan for the day -care center and the
office. Mr. Brasseale said that the site had a 90 -foot
change in grade and that would limit the area of development
March 24, 1987
Item No. 3 - Continued
and should minimize any impacts on the area. Mike Taylor,
representing the Green Mountain Park Property Owners
Association, objected to the rezoning. He said that the
association's board voted to oppose the "O -1" request and
presented petitions with 60 signatures. Mr. Taylor then
reviewed some of the concerns of the residents: (1) spot
zoning, (2) the developer is not bound to any plan, (3)
rezoning will reduce the property values, (4) potential
noise and lighting problems, (5) site problems, and (6) a
privacy issue. He requested that the "O -1" rezoning be
denied. There was a discussion about restricting the "O -1"
area with some "O -S" zoning. Mr. Taylor said that he did
not support any office zoning because of problems of
conforming to a plan. Mr. Brasseale talked about the
Woodland Hills development and their desire to maintain a
quality neighborhood. He felt that an office use was more
compatible and he was willing to modify the request to
include "O -S." Ron Moore, a resident of Woodland Hills,
said that he bought his lot because of the woods and that he
had no problems with the proposed site plan. At that point,
Mr. Brasseale amended the request to "O -1" and "O -S" as
shown on the site plan. A motion was made to grant the
request as amended. The motion was approved by a vote of
8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 4 - Z- 3355 -B
Owner: Southwest Properties
Applicant: McKay Properties, Inc.
By: David Henry
Location: Mabelvale Cutoff and Geyer Springs
NW corner
Request: Rezone from "C -2" to "C -3"
Purpose: Commercial
Size: 3.22 acres
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "C -2"
South - Vacant, Zoned "R -2"
East - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R -2"
West - Vacant, Zoned "C -2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to rezone 3.2 acres from "C -2" to "C -3"
for an unspecified commercial use or uses. The parcel
under consideration is part of a larger tract, 8.9
acres, with the balance to remain "C -2." If the "C -3"
rezoning is granted, the area will probably be
subdivided into two lots with one "C -2" tract and some
type of internal street system. The zoning in the area
is made up of "R -2," "MF -18," "MF -24," and "C -3" which
is approximately two blocks to the west on Mabelvale
Cutoff. The land use north of Mabelvale is primarily
single family subdivisions with one large multifamily
project and a portion of the existing "C -3" is occupied
by a convenience store and car wash. South of
Mabelvale Cutoff, a high percentage of the land is
still vacant, but there is a multifamily project to the
west. Rezoning the corner of two arterials to "C -3" is
reasonable and should not create any problems for the
nearby residential neighborhoods.
2. The site is vacant and heavily wooded.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 4 - Continued
3. There are no right -of -way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues. The survey reflects dedication of
right -of -way for both Geyer Springs and Mabelvale
Cutoff. Engineering will have to determine if
additional right -of -way is needed because of being
located at a major intersection. (See No. 4.)
4. Engineering reports that:
o The Traffic Engineer shall approve all access and
circulation points with regard to this property.
There shall be no driveways closer than 300' from
each other. Therefore, close coordination with the
Traffic Engineer is desired before the development
process continues.
o Boundary street improvements are required on both
Geyer Springs Road and Mabelvale Cutoff. Again,
coordination with the Traffic Engineer is essential
due to additional turning lanes required on both
Geyer Springs Road and Mabelvale Cutoff.
Right -of -way requirements at both intersections will
be 100' total ROW, therefore, 50' from centerline on
both properties.
5. There are no legal issues associated with this request.
6. The land was originally rezoned to a commercial
district in 1979. At that time, there was some
opposition from the surrounding residential
neighborhoods. In 1981, the property was reclassified
to "C -2" through the conversion adjustment process.
This was done to allow for additional input from the
neighborhood prior to any development taking place on
the property because of the required site plan review.
The most recent rezoning attempt was in 1985 when a
"C -3" application was filed for the total tract, but
the request was withdrawn from consideration.
7. With the previous "C -3" request, staff did not support
the rezoning because it was for the entire site and
would have removed the potential for any site plan
review. The current proposal is more desirable because
it will have a "C -2" area adjacent to the single family
neighborhoods to the north and west. This along with
the 50 -foot buffer should minimize any potential
impacts from the "C -3" reclassification. The permitted
uses of "C -2" and "C -3" are basically the same, so that
should not raise any concerns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the "C -3" rezoning.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 4 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, McKay Properties, was represented by Randy
Fraizer, an attorney. There were no objectors. Mr. Fraizer
reviewed the history of the site and described the area. He
said that the existing "C -2" zoning did not work for the
entire site and that some "C -3" was needed to market the
property. John McKay presented some additional history and
said that right -of -way had been dedicated. There was a long
discussion about the various issues. Mr. McKay said that
the owners will maintain a commitment to the neighborhood
through site plan review for the remaining "C -2" area.
There were some comments made about the size of the proposed
"C -3" tract and Mr. McKay said that there was no specific
reason for the 375 -foot frontage. Mr. Fraizer made some
additional comments. Don Chambers then addressed the
Commission and said that he had worked on several conceptual
plans for the site. He also said that the 375 -foot
dimension would allow for a 60 -foot street. A motion was
made to recommend approval of the "C -3" request as filed.
The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and
3 absent.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 5 - Z- 4175 -B
Owner: Ellen Williams and Leslie T. Rogers
Applicant: Leslie T. Rogers
Location: Aldersgate Road Area
Request: Rezone from "OS" to "R -2"
Purpose: Single Family
Size: 0.15 acres
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North
- Vacant,
Zoned
"OS"
South
- Vacant,
Zoned
"OS"
East
- Vacant.
Zoned
"OS"
West
- Vacant,
Zoned
"OS"
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The rezoning request involves a small tract of land located
in the Aldersgate Camp vicinity. It is one of the several
outparcels that are still owned by individuals and not by
the three major landowners found in the area. The rezoning
of this land has been before the Planning Commission on two
occasions, with the most recent being November 25, 1986.
The Commission first acted on a rezoning proposal in 1984,
and the application included some tracts not owned by the
three principal parties, First Federal, Aldersgate Camp, and
E.R.C. At the request of First Federal, the City Attorney's
Office reviewed the situation and recommended that a second
rezoning application be filed excluding the uncommited
outparcels. On November 25, 1986, the Commission
recommended approval of the rezoning as filed, excluding the
outparcels. At the hearing, Mr. Leslie Rogers, owner of a
number of these lots, expressed some concern over his
ability to develop property that was zoned "OS." The
Commission approved a second motion giving Mr. Rogers 90
days to negotiate with First Federal for the sale of lots,
or file for an "R -2" reclassification. Mr. Rogers has been
unable to reach an agreement with First Federal and is now
requesting the change from "OS" to 11R -2."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning as requested.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 5 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. A
motion was made to recommend approval of the "R -2" rezoning.
The motion passed b a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 6 - Z -4796
Owner: Gayland and Helen King
Applicant: Gayland King
Location: 7008 Fourche Dam Pike
Request: Rezone from "R -2" to "I -2"
Purpose: Warehouse
Size: 9.1 acres
Existing Use: Warehouse
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North
- Vacant,
Zoned "R -2"
South
- Vacant
and Single
Family, Zoned "R -2"
East
- Vacant
and Single
Family, Zoned "R -2"
West
- Vacant
and Single
Family, Zoned "R -2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The request is to rezone a 9 -acre tract from "R -2" to
"I -2" to permit an addition to an existing building.
The property is nonconforming and the Zoning Ordinance
prohibits any expansion of a nonconforming use without
first rezoning the site. The property is located east
of the airport and in an area that is zoned "R -2." The
land use is single family with a church and several
large vacant tracts in the immediate vicinity.
Directly to the east, there is an established single
family subdivision and along Fourche Dam Pike, there
are a number of residences on large lots. The existing
residential development is well maintained and an
industrial rezoning of this size could have an impact
on the quality of life in the area.
2. The property is occupied by a total of seven structures
that are used for warehousing and other related
activities. In the rear of the site, there are a
number of mini storage units.
3. Fourche Dam Pike is classified as a collector on the
Master Street Plan, and it appears that some dedication
of additional right -of -way will be required.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 6 - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. The property was annexed to the City in 1985 as part of
the referendum area. There is documented neighborhood
position on the site.
7. This location is part of the East River Island Land Use
Plan area which was adopted by the City in 1984 under
the provisions of the River Zoning Statute. At that
time, the area was outside the city limits, but the
City could exercise its planning authority through the
River Zoning Act. In addition to adopting the plan, a
large part of the area was rezoned to "R -2" to protect
the existing residential development. The Land Use
Plan recommends primarily a residential pattern north
of Fourche Dam Pike, but it does identify a small
industrial site to the west of this property. Staff
believes that the intent of the plan was to recognize
the existing nonresidential uses so it appears that the
industrial area is shown incorrectly and probably
should be reflected on a portion of the property under
consideration. After reviewing the request and the
plan, staff feels that it would be inappropriate to
rezone a 9 -acre tract to "I -2" because of the potential
for adversely impacting the surrounding residential
development. Another concern is that the rezoning
would create a large spot zoning which the staff cannot
support. Also, being adjacent to a residential area,
several uses permitted in the "I -2" district could
cause some problems for the residents as could the
expansion of this use. The property has a
nonconforming status and the use can continue to
operate at the current level.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the "I -2" rezoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, Gayland King, was present. There were two
objectors in attendance. Mr. King addressed the Commission
and said that he operates a box company and has some mini
storage units. He went on to say that he plans to expand
one of the buildings and add some additional storage units.
Mr. King then questioned other rezonings in the area and
made a number of comments. Floyd Ford, a resident to the
March 24, 1987
Item No. 6 - Continued
east, objected to the rezoning because he said that it would
decrease property value. Staff then discussed the area and
the East River Island Plan. Mr. King spoke and described
the Isgrig property and the rezoning of it. Additional
comments were offered by both the staff and the Commission.
A motion was then made to close the public hearing. The
motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes, 1 no, and 2 absent.
Some additional comments were made about spot zoning and
utilizing PID for the property. There was a long discussion
about the various issues including the land use plan and the
future of the area. A motion was then made to defer the
request, but after some discussion the motion was withdrawn.
Mr. King addressed the Commission and requested that a vote
be taken on the "I -2" rezoning. A motion was made to
recommend approval of the "I -2" application. The vote:
0 ayes, 8 noes, and 3 absent. The request was denied.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 7 - Z -4797
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Various Owners
Leah D. Tillman
2316 Chester Street
Special Use Permit
Day -Care, 10 Children or Less
0.16 acres
Existing Use: Residential (Zoned "R -4 ")
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North
Single
Family,
Zoned
"R -4"
South
- Single
Family,
Zoned
"R -4"
East
- Single
Family,
Zoned
"R -4"
West
- Single
Family,
Zoned
"R -4"
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The issue before the Commission is to grant a special use
permit for a day -care family home. The Zoning Ordinance's
definition of a day -care family home is:
Any facility which provides family like child
care in the care giver's own family residence
in accordance with provisions of licensing
procedures established by the State of Arkansas
and which serves no more than 10 children
including the care giver's own children. Said
facility must obtain a special use permit in
all zoning districts where day -care centers
are now allowed by right.
Also, the Planning Commission has final authority except
that appeals from the Commission's action may be filed with
the Board of Directors.
The property is a conventional residential lot with a single
structure on it. The house is somewhat in disrepair and
the problems should be corrected prior to the day -care
opening. It appears that there is adequate yard area for
the children which is important for providing a quality care
program. The other lots in the block are occupied by single
family residences, but there should be no problems created
by the proposed use because of the number of children.
March 24, 1987
Item No. 7 - Continued
An important element of day -care operation is having a safe
drop off point. Chester Street does not provide such a
location and also there is no driveway coming off Chester.
The lot abuts an alley along the rear property line, and the
alley is in good condition, so it can function as the drop
off and pick up area. This should minimize disruption of
traffic in the neighborhood and protect the children.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the special use permit with the
following conditions:
1. That only the alley be used as the drop off and
pick up point.
2. Additional screening be provided along the south
property line.
3. That the structure meet all necessary City codes.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (3- 24 -87)
Staff informed the Commission that the item needed to be
deferred. A motion was made to defer the request to the
May 19, 1987, meeting. The motion was approved by a vote of
8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.
ADDENDUM TO AGENDA - MARCH 24, 1987
PLANNING COMMISSION COMM ITTEE S_1987
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
Richard Massie, Chairman
Rose Collins
Fred Perkins
Walter Riddick, III
John Schlereth
PLANS COMMITTEE
David Jones, Chairman
Dorothy Arnett
William Ketcher
Jerilyn Nicholson
Betty Sipes
DATE� ef¼/767
P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N
V O T E R E C O R D
ITEM NUMBERS
ZONING SUBDIVISION
MEMBER
W.Riddick, III-., --
J.Schlereth
R.Massie
B.Sipes
J.Nicholson
w.Rector
W.Ketcher
D.Arnett
D.J. Jones
R.Collins
F.Perkins
II v
✓ " Ill
.,/
/
�
/)
✓
/} ,,
✓
./
I z
✓/,. ,/ ✓
✓ .,/
,,/ ✓
I/ /
✓,/
✓ ✓
,,/ /
3 " ,S to 7
./ ✓ ✓ :, ,_,,,. _.
"/ ✓ v/ • ✓
iFT
✓✓ ✓ • /
/ " ✓/ • ✓
,/ ,/ L, / ✓ •
,r
✓,/ "✓ , ,/•IA---
✓✓ / A al
.,/ ,/ / , ✓
✓AYE � NAYE A A£3SENT �ABSTAIN
I I �
March 24, 1987
There being no further business before the Commission, the
meeting was adjourned at 3:15 p.m.
Date
Chairman _ Secretary