Loading...
pc_08 03 2017 LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING – REZONING – CONDITIONAL USE HEARING MINUTE RECORD AUGUST 3, 2017 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being nine (9) in number. II. Members Present: Craig Berry Alan Bubbus Buelah Bynum Rebecca Finney Scott Hamilton Troy Laha Paul Latture Bill May Robert Stebbins Members Absent: Keith Cox Janet Dillon City Attorney: Shawn Overton III. Approval of the Minutes of the June 22, 2017 Meeting of the Little Rock Planning Commission. The Minutes were approved as presented. LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING – REZONING – CONDITIONAL USE HEARING AUGUST 3, 2017 4:00 P.M. I. OLD BUSINESS: NO OLD BUSINESS II. NEW BUSINESS: Item Number: File Number: Title: 1. G-23-467 Wellington Village Road – Right-of-Way Abandonment Southeast corner of Wellington Village Road at Wellington Hills Road 2. Z-9237 Rezoning from R-2 to C-4 10010 Interstate 30 3. Z-9233 603 West Markham Commercial Parking Lot – Conditional Use Permit 603 West Markham Street 4. Z-9234 Long Accessory Dwelling – Conditional Use Permit 19 River Valley Road 5. Z-9235 Truth and Transitions Homeless Shelter – Conditional Use Permit 7109 Archwood Drive 6. Z-9236 TBA Holdings Accessory Dwelling – Conditional Use Permit 127 Vernon Avenue 7. Z-9238 Pettigrew Daycare Center – Conditional Use Permit 3101 Asher Avenue 8. G-25-220 West 65th Street Name Change to Hindman Parkway West 65th Street, West of University Avenue August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 1 FILE NO.: G-23-467 Name: Wellington Village Road – Right-of-Way Abandonment Location: Southeast corner of Wellington Village Road and Wellington Hills Road Owner/Applicant: Winrock Development Company, The Church at Wellington and 15400 Chenal, LLC/Joe White, White-Daters and Associates Request: To abandon approximately 1.29 acres of excess Wellington Village Road right-of-way. Purpose: To incorporate into the adjacent O-1 zoned property to the east (unrecorded Tract B, The Villages of Wellington) for the development of administrative offices for a church facility. STAFF REVIEW : A. Public Need for this Right-of-Way: As noted in paragraph G., several of the utility companies request portions of the proposed area of abandonment be retained as utility easements. Public Works has reviewed the abandonment request and has no comments. B. Master Street Plan: The requested abandonment is for excess right-of-way at this intersection of Wellington Village Road and Wellington Hills Road. After abandonment, adequate right-of-way will exist to satisfy the City’s Master Street Plan. C. Characteristics of Right-of-Way Terrain: The area of abandonment is currently undeveloped and tree covered. The property slopes generally downward from north to south and west to east. The adjacent property to the east (unrecorded Parcel B, The Villages of Wellington) is also undeveloped and tree covered. D. Development Potential: After abandonment, the area of abandonment will be incorporated into the Parcel B, The Villages of Wellington for development of administrative offices for a church facility. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: G-23-467 2 E. Neighborhood and Land Use Effect: Undeveloped O-1 zoned property is located immediately east of the area proposed for abandonment. A church facility is located to the north. Undeveloped O-3 zoned property is located to the south, with undeveloped C-1 zoned property to the west, across Wellington Hills Road. There is a mixture of commercial, multifamily and single-family uses in this general area. F. Neighborhood Position: All abutting property owners have signed-off on the abandonment request. The Villages of Wellington Neighborhood Association was notified of the abandonment request. Staff knows of no objectors to the abandonment request. G. Effect on Public Services or Utilities: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: A 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easement will be required, running north/south through the center of the proposed abandonment area. A 10 foot wide sanit ary sewer easement will be required at the northwest corner of the proposed abandonment area. Entergy: Approved as submitted. Centerpoint Energy: “Centerpoint Energy owns and operates known natural gas facilities directly adjacent to the proposed abandoned ROW along Wellington Village Road. Centerpoint Energy requests a 10’ (minimum) General Utility Easement be maintained parallel to Wellington Village & Wellington Hills Road in regards to the proposed abandonment.” AT&T: AT&T has a fiber cable on the east side of Wellington Hills that runs north and crosses Wellington Village Road The applicant can either reimburse AT&T for moving the cable (if there is a suitable place to relocate), or he can grant an easement across the property to encompass the cable. White Daters can either dedicate the easement on its plat, or if the applicant prefers, AT&T can send him an AT&T easement to sign. If the applicant signs our easement, AT&T will need to be provided with a recordable easement description. Central Arkansas Water: Central Arkansas Water approved as submitted. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: G-23-467 3 H. Reversionary Rights: According to an abstract company, the right-of-way was dedicated via an easement deed (89-19948) recorded on April 18, 1989 and a right-of-way deed (94-06676) recorded on October 1, 1993. Neither deed contains reversionary clauses. I. Public Welfare and Safety Issues: Abandoning this excess right-of-way will have no adverse impact on the public welfare and safety. The Little Rock Fire Department has reviewed and approved the abandonment request. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY 12, 2017) Joe White was present, representing the application. Staff briefly described the proposed right-of-way abandonment. Staff noted that there were no outstand ing issues associated with the request. After a brief discussion, the Committee forwarded the application to the full Commission for resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to abandon the excess right-of-way for Wellington Village Road, subject to areas of the abandonment being retained as utility easements, as noted in paragraph G. of the staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staf f presented the application with a recommendation of approval. The application was placed on the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff. The vote was 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent. The application was approved. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: Z-9237 Owner: James Robert Boles Applicant: Mark V. Hodge/Oppidam Holdings, LLC Location: 10010 Interstate 30 Area: 2.916 Acres Request: Rezone from R-2 to C-4 Purpose: Retail development Existing Use: Undeveloped property SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North – Undeveloped property; zoned C-3 South – Mixed commercial uses (across I-30); zoned C-3 and C-4 East – Nonconforming vacant commercial buildings; zoned R-2 Mixed commercial uses (further east); zoned C-4 West – Undeveloped property, Highway Department maintenance facility and mixed commercial uses; zoned R-2, C-4 and PCD A. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: No Comments. B. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: The site is not located on a Rock Region Metro bus route. Route #23 (Baseline/Southwest Route) runs along Baseline Road to the south. C. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site and the SWLR United for Progress and Town and Country Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9237 2 D. LAND USE ELEMENT: Planning Division: This request is located in Geyer Springs West Planning District. The Land Use Plan Commercial (C) for this property. The Commercial category includes a broad range of retail and wholesale sales of prod ucts, personal and professional services, and general business activities. Commercial activities vary in type and scale, depending on the trade area that they serve. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single Family District) to C-4 (Open Display District) to allow a new retail store to be built. Master Street Plan: South of the property is Frontage Road to Interstate 30 and it is a Freeway on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Freeway is to serve through long distance trips. Freeways are always designed as full access control roads (no direct access). Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on I-30 since it is a Freeway. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. E. STAFF ANALYSIS: James Robert Boles, owner of the 2.916 acre property located at 10010 Interstate 30, is requesting to rezone the property from “R-2” Single Family District to “C-4” Open Display District. The property is located on the north side of Interstate 30, approximately 1,200 feet east of the I-30/Baseline Road intersection. The rezoning is proposed for the development of a retail store facility. The 2.916 acre property is currently undeveloped. Remnants of an old asphalt drive, parking and concrete building foundation exists within the south one -third of the property along the I-30 frontage road. The remainder of the property is undeveloped and tree-covered. The overall property is relatively flat. The property is located in an area of mixed uses and zoning along Interstate 30. The R-2 zoned property to the north/west contains a State Highway Department maintenance facility. Undeveloped C-3 zoned property is located to the north along Mabelvale Pike. Nonconforming commercial structures are located on the R-2 zoned property immediately to the east, with C-4 zoning and uses further east. C-4 and PCD zoned property is located to the west. Mixed commercial and light industrial uses are located on C-3, C-4 and I-2 zoned property located across I-30 to the south. The City’s Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Commercial (C). The requested C-4 zoning does not require an amendment to the plan. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9237 3 Staff is supportive of the requested rezoning. Staff views the request as reasonable. Staff feels that the proposed C-4 zoning represents an appropriate continuation of the zoning pattern in this general area along Interstate 30. There is existing C-4 zoned property to the east, west and south (across I-30). In addition, there is an abundance of C-3 and I-2 zoned property within this area. Staff believes that the proposed C-4 zoning for 2.916 acres will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested C-4 rezoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval. The application was placed on the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff. The vote was 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent. The application was approve d. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: Z-9233 NAME: 603 West Markham Commercial Parking Lot – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 603 West Markham Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Capital Group Investors, LLC PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow for the use of the existing parking lot located behind this building as a commercial parking lot. The property is zoned UU, Urban Use District. 1. SITE LOCATION: The proposed commercial parking lot is located behind the build ing at 603 West Markham Street; south side of Markham, west of Arch Street. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The property is located in area characterized by office and governmental uses. City of Little Rock offices and facilities are located along West Markham Street for a block both east and west of the site. Pulaski County offices are located to the east. There are existing commercial surface parking lots located south, southeast and southwest of the site. Numerous commercial surface parking lots are located in the general area. The proposed use is compatible with uses in the area. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the Downtown Neighborhood Association. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: This existing asphalt-paved parking lot contains 20 parking spaces. No changes are proposed other than to make improvements to the driveway apron onto Arch Street to comply with Public Works’ requirement noted below. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: Site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Any new site development shall adhere to the current landscape code. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9233 2 The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 5. PUBLIC WORKS: 1. The proposed driveway apron should be constructed as a complete apron with 2 radiuses in conformance with CLR standard detail PW -34. The driveway radius cannot extend beyond the side property line. 2. Are gates proposed to be installed? If so, the call box for the gate must be located at least 15 ft. from the back of the sidewalk. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: Sewer available to this site. Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. Service is already being provided to this property from the east side of the property with no apparent conflicts with existing facilities. Please be careful that all clearances are maintained to overhead power lines as the entrance to the parking is being expanded. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. Centerpoint Energy: No comments received. AT&T: No comments received. Central Arkansas Water: No objection. Fire Department: Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9233 3 Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101 – C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshal’s Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Building Codes: Project is a change in occupancy and is therefore subject to current building code requirements. Review and approval is required by Building Codes Division before occupancy takes place. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey@littlerock.org or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.org. Notes: As per previous discussions with Mr. Mark Alderfer: This would be considered an S-2, Enclosed Parking Garage with both floors required to have fire sprinkler installations. A drawing from a licensed Mechanical Engineer would need to be submitted for a code compliant exhaust system. Two compliant exists from each floor will be required as per 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9233 4 This will require modifications to both interior and exterior stairs as well as egress path compliance with 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Other building elements will be reviewed to include but not be limited to emergency lighting, exit lighting, door hardware, wall penetrations and separations from the existing adjacent occupancy. Handicap code review as per 2009 ANSI. County Planning: No comments. Rock Region METRO: a) Location is currently served by nearby METRO routes 21 Riverdale with many connecting routes adjacent to the property. We d o not support adding parking to the central business district where surface lots, parking garages and on-street parking is more than ample. Parking is the highest volume land use in the CBD. Many surface lots are not full during business hours. Transit, biking and walking are great ways to get around downtown without adding more parking. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY 12, 2017) The applicants were present. Staff presented the item and noted little additional information was needed. Staff informed the Committee members that the CUP was for the surface parking lot behind the building and some of the review comments were related to the proposal to use part of the structure as a parking garage. Staff stated those comments were informational since the enclosed parking garage is a permitted use in the UU District. Staff requested a signage plan. In response to a question, the applicants stated there would be an on -site pay kiosk and it would not be located in the driveway. Public Works Comments were discussed. The applicants stated the driveway apron would be improved and there would be no gate. Utility, Building Codes and Other Agency Comments were noted. The applicant was advised to submit responses to staff issues by July 19. The Committee determined there were no other issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9233 5 STAFF ANALYSIS: The “UU” zoned property located at 603 West Markham Street is occupied by a vacant, two-story, brick and frame building. A 20-space parking lot, with access off of Arch Street, is located behind the building. The new owners of the property have plans for redevelopment of the site, including phased redevelopment of the existing building. The first phase is to use the ground floor of the building for a parking structure with access off of West Markham. Future phase will possibly include putting active uses in the building. The proposed parking structure is a permitted use in the UU district, subject to some design criteria which must be met. The applicants are proposing to use the existing surface parking lot behind the building as a commercial parking lot with spaces being rented for hourly, daily and monthly parking. A surface commercial parking lot requires a conditional use permit in the UU district. No change are proposed to this existing parking lot other than for the required improvements to the driveway apron. An existing pole sign will be used. The sign measures 4' X 4' X 12' tall. A pay kiosk will be installed on the south side of the property. To staff’s knowledge there are no outstanding issues. Allowing use of the existing parking lot as a surface parking lot is compatible with uses in the area. The plat/bill of assurance for the Original City does not address use issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP, subject to compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicants were present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff recommendation” above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 4 FILE NO.: Z-9234 NAME: Long Accessory Dwelling – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 19 River Valley Road OWNER/APPLICANT: Chad Long PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow for construction of an accessory dwelling on this R-2 zoned lot. 1. SITE LOCATION: The property is located on the east side of River Valley Road, in the River Ridge Neighborhood off of Cantrell Road. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The property is located in a neighborhood of larger single family homes. Although it is not readily apparent, it appears that at least two other properties in the neighborhood contain accessory dwellings. The subdivision’s bill of assurance does permit guest houses. The addition of a guest house should have no effect on other properties in the neighborhood. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site. There is no contact information for the River Ridge Neighborhood Association in the City’s database. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The principal dwelling and proposed accessory dwelling each require one parking space. There is existing paved parking available for four vehicles. No change to the parking is proposed. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: No Comments. 5. PUBLIC WORKS: No Comments. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9234 2 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: Sewer available to this site. Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. Service is already being provided to this property from the rear of the property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. Centerpoint Energy: No comments received. AT&T: No comments received. Central Arkansas Water: No objection Fire Department: No comment. Building Codes: No comment. County Planning: No comments. Rock Region METRO: a) Location is not served by MET RO. We have no objections to proposed improvements. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY 12, 2017) Applicant Nicole Long was present. Staff presented the item and noted some additional information was needed. The applicant was asked to provide information on the proposed construction materials and to provide a description of the number and types of rooms in the proposed accessory dwelling. Staff asked the applicant to determine if separate utilities would be requested. In response to a question, Ms. Long stated the accessory dwelling would not ever be a rental unit; that it would only serve as a guest house. Staff informed the Committee of the needed variance for a reduced front setback of 50 feet. Public Works, Fire Department and Other Agency Comments were noted. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9234 3 The applicant was advised to provide responses to staff issues by July 19. The Committee determined there were no other issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: The “R-2” zoned lot located at 19 River Valley Road is occupied by a two-story single family residence. The applicants are requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of an accessory dwelling (guest house). The proposed accessory dwelling will consist of a 600 square foot wood frame structure with vinyl siding and asphalt shingled roof. The roof and building color will match the existing home. The accessory dwelling will be in the form of a studio apartment with a big room and a single bathroom that is closed for privacy. The living area, sleeping area and kitchen will all be in the main space. No separate utilities are requested. The accessory dwelling will not be a rental unit. Occupancy will be limited to friends and family members of the property owners who will reside on site. To staff’s knowledge, there are no outstanding issues. The 1962 Bill of Assurance for River Ridge Manor (which may or may not still be in effect) permits “guest house, servant’s quarters and other outbuildings incidental and re lated to the residential use of the permission…” A variance is requested to allow a front yard setback of 50 feet rather than the typical ordinance requirement of 60. The property does have a severe slope downward from the street and the buildable area is nearer the existing house. Staff believes there is justification to approve the minor setback variance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP, subject to compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends approval of the requested front setback variance. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff recommendation “above. Staff also recommended approval of the requested August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9234 4 front setback variance. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved, including the setback variance, by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 FILE NO.: Z-9235 NAME: Truth and Transitions Homeless Shelter – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 7109 Archwood Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: Henri Pousardien PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow for the use of the existing residence on this R-2 zoned lot as a 13-bed homeless shelter. 1. SITE LOCATION: The property is located on the south side of Archwood Drive; the last residence on the street before entering Boyle Park. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The property is located at the western edge of a single family residential neighborhood. Single family homes are located east and south of the site. Boyle Park, a City of Little Rock public park, is located adjacent to the west and across Archwood to the north. The proposal is to utilize this single family residential structure as a homeless shelter for up to thirteen (13) individuals. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed use is institutional in nature and not appropriate for placement in a single family neighborhood. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the Broadmoor, Broadmoor Property Owners Association and University District Neighborhood Associations. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The site contains a double-wide, concrete driveway with stacked space for 4 vehicles. The applicant states the residents of the homeless shelter will not have vehicles and will depend on volunteers to provide transportation. The nearest public transportation is a Rock Region Metro bus route located on University Avenue, .83± miles to the east. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: No Comments. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 2 5. PUBLIC WORKS: No Comments. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: Sewer available to this site. Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. Service is already being provided to this property from the rear of the property with no apparent conflicts with existing facilities. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. Centerpoint Energy: No comments received AT&T: No comments received Central Arkansas Water: No objection Fire Department: Full plans review Building Codes: Project is a change in occupancy and is therefore subject to current building code requirements. Review and approval is required by Building Codes Division before occupancy takes place. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: NOTE: Contact FM Capt. Chris Sanders to coordinate an on-site review at 501-918-3782. Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey@littlerock.org or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.org. The building size and type of structure appear to be 1700 sf and 13 beds. This is allowed with the occupancy being “Residential – 4”. If the building occupancy is raised to 16 or more it becomes an “Institutional – 4” Occupancy and Fire Sprinkler Installations are required. Cooking means and methods must be reviewed by the FM Office and there is a possibility of a Fire Extinguishing system and a ventilation system being required. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 3 County Planning: No comments. Rock Region METRO: a) Location is served by METRO along University Ave. primarily by route 22. We do not recommend this conditional use location because it is .85 miles away from the bus route. If the mission of the group is to get people back on their feet, a bus ride to an interview, a steady job or treatment services will be important. Facilities should be centrally located .25 miles from the bus route or less for an effective commute. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY 12, 2017) The applicant, Henri Pousardien, was present. Staff presented the item and noted some additional information was needed. Staff asked if any of the residents would drive and, if so, where would the vehicles be parked. Mr. Pousardien stated he did not anticipate any of the residents having vehicles. He stated volunteers would provide transportation. Staff asked if there would be a full or part time staff person or manager on site. Mr. Pousardien responded that one of the residents would serve as home leader and any issues that the home leader could not resolve would be forwarded to Paul Owens of Truth and Transitions. Staff stated it appeared the size of the house and the various sleeping rooms complied with the Chapter 8 square footage requirements for 13 persons. Staff presented the separation, spacing and procedural issues for homeless shelters from the zoning ordinance for the committee members information. In response to a question, Mr. Pousardien stated the house had 1 ¾ bathrooms. He stated most of the food for the facility was donated. He said the residents could also share and do some cooking. Other agency comments were noted. The Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: The R-2 zoned property located at 7109 Archwood Drive contains a one-story, 1,706 square foot, single-family residential structure. The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to use the structure for a homeless shelter for up to thirteen (13) individuals. The applicant began use of the structure for the homeless shelter without proper zoning approval and was issued a notice to cease that use or to file for a conditional use permit. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 4 The applicant submitted the following information in support of the application: Mission Statement The mission of Truth & Transitions (T&T) is to provide a faith based, safe and secure housing environment for individuals who because of difficult circumstances need housing and mentoring to assist them in becoming a productive member of society. Statement of Services, Accessibility Admission Criteria, and Contact Person The T&T ministry provides a home with a bed, rented by the week, mentoring and discipleship, and assistance in acquiring a job. The current cost is $100 per week. The home is available, as required, 24 hours a day to those who are homeless or with drug and/or alcohol addictions who desire help and are willing to follow the published home rules until they are able to live on their own. The current primary contact person is the Home Leader: Paul Owens, 501.952.5048. The house will have room for up to 13 beds as follows: Square Feet Beds Master Bedroom 156 2 Bedroom 2 143 2 Bedroom 3 108 1 Study 125 2 Den 340 6 13 T&T receives no funds as donations. Occasionally the ministry has received donations of food. T&T is not receiving any government funding. All income is derived from residents paying rent ("Profit and Loss" statement available upon request). T&T is a homeless shelter, not a rehab facility. If individuals need rehab we do not take them in until after they have competed a rehab program at other facilities. If a current resident is deemed to need rehab we dismiss them from our home until rehab elsewhere has been completed and then reconsider accepting them back to our home. Our residents have been referred to us from various sources two of which are Bridgeway and the Veterans Administration (VA). T&T August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 5 maintains a controlled and structured environment that conducts regular random drug testing to ensure compliance with our stated rules of no tolerance of illegal controlled substances (see attached "Home Rules"). Part of the screening process is to reject those who have a violent or sexual criminal offence background. T&T assists with immediate job placement and in the interim provides opportunities for residents to work for rent. The goal is to have the residents ready to move on to more permanent housing within two months. Unfortunately some only stay a few days due to non - compliance of the stated house rules. Some residents suffer from various medical conditions. T&T is bringing a volunteer registered nurse on board to monitor these medical situations and dispense prescription medications. Section 8-406 (a) of the City's Buildings and Building Regulations Ordinance (minimum area per dwellings unit) requires 150 square feet for the first occupant and 100 square feet for each additional occupant. Therefore, the minimum area for a residence occupied by 13 persons is 1,350 square feet. The residential structure contains 1,706 square feet. Section 8-406 (b) (minimum area per bedroom) requires 70 square feet for the first occupant and 50 square feet for each additional occupant. According to Section 8-406 of City Code, following is the minimum required area for each bedroom with the occupancy as proposed: Square Feet Beds Master Bedroom 156 2 Bedroom 2 143 2 Bedroom 3 108 1 Study 125 2 Den 340 6 13 Separation, spacing and procedural requirements for homeless shelters will be determined by the planning commission so as not to adversely impact the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Unless the commission determines that a different area is more appropriate, a neighborhood shall be defined as an area incorporating all properties lying within one thousand five hundred (1,500) feet of the site for which the permit is requested. In addition to the development standards and review guidelines established in section 36-107 of this chapter, August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 6 issues that the planning commission will consider during its review of such facilities include, but are not limited to: a. Spacing of existing similar facilities. b. Existing zoning and land use pattern. c. The maximum number of individuals proposed to be served, the number of employees proposed and type of services being proposed . d. Provisions for readily accessible public or quasi-public transportation. e. Access to support services such as social services agencies, employment agencies and medical service providers. Within the defined neighborhood area of 1,500 feet from the site the predominate uses are the single family neighborhoods extending to the east and south and Boyle Park extending to the north and west. Other uses within 1,500 feet of the site are a church located at 2924 Ware (approximately 1,200 feet) and a church located at 7201 West 32nd Street (approximately 1,200 feet). Just beyond the 1,500 foot distance are a church and daycare at 6724 West 32nd Street (approximately 1,600 feet), a day care at 3200 Bryant (approximately 1,700 feet) and a Little Rock School District Elementary and Learning Academy Campus at the southeast corner of 32nd and Bryant (approximately 1,800 feet). There do not appear to be any similar facilities in the area. There is no readily accessible public transportation. The nearest Rock Region Metro bus route is located on S. University Avenue, approximately .83 miles east. Although the square footage of the house and proposed sleeping areas appear to meet the minimum standards of Chapter 8, it leaves no or very little common living area. It appears all rooms, save the kitchen and bathrooms, are proposed for use as sleeping areas. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed 13-bed shelter is too intense a use for this site. The use is not compatible with and will negatively affect other properties in the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the requested CUP. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 7 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicant, Henri Pousardian, was present with three (3) persons present in support. There were numerous persons present in opposition. Several letters and e-mails and a petition of opposition had been received by staff and delivered to the commissioners. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of denial. Henri Pousardian addressed the commission. He stated the property had been rental housing for eighteen (18) years. He stated he started Truth and Transitions ministry to provide a safe, secure and supervised environment for those in need. He stated the shelter had previously been located in Sherwood but he moved it to this location when this property became available. Mr. Pousardian stated the level of control over the residents of the shelter would be greater than what could be exercised over the tenants of a rental home due to the shelter’s rules. Mr. Pousardian stated there was a need for this type of housing. He stated some of the residents come to the shelter out of a correctional facility and need a safe and secured environment; otherwise, they could fall back into their previous lifestyle. He stated Truth and Transitions was a faith-based organization that would be a benefit to the City. He stated seventy (70) to one-hundred (100) persons per year would pass through the facility. Melissa Teeling, of 7101 Archwood, spoke in opposition. She stated she first became aware of the shelter in March 2017 and made the City aware of the matter. She voiced concerns about the amount of traffic at the site and questioned the activities taking place on the property. Ms. Teeling spoke of a number of police-related incidents at the property since T & T moved in. She noted the proximity of the shelter to a City park. Kamilia Williams, of 7105 Archwood, spoke in opposition. She voiced concerns about traffic, the regularity of police responses to the site and the number of people in the shelter. Ms. Williams stated the shelter was a good thing, just not at this location. She said the level of activity at the site was too great for a residential neighborhood. She also stated she was tired of picking up their garbage. Danny York, of 35 Talmage, spoke in opposition. He stated it was a flawed plan to have this intense a use in a neighborhood. Richard Higginbotham, of 35 Talmage, stated his opposition to the item. Mark Franks, of 1 Talmage Court, spoke in opposition. He presented additional signatures on the previously submitted petition of opposition. He stated the neighborhood was zoned for single family. He went through several sections of the applicant’s proposal and questioned the validity of statements made by the applicant. Mr. Franks said there were disturbing red flags and he felt there had August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9235 8 been a false representation of what was being proposed. He asked the commission to deny the application. Debra Boyland, of 58 Maryton Park, stated her opposition to the item. Chuck Bomer, of 64 Maryton Park Cove, spoke in opposition. He stated there were too many people being proposed for the shelter. He stated there was a lack of space for the individuals, insufficient exits, no accessible public transportation, insufficient bathrooms and lack of private space for the occupants. Joe Busby, President of the University District Neighborhoods Association, spoke in opposition. He stated the association represented nine (9) area neighborhoods who were united in opposition to the proposal. He said the surrounding neighborhood was single family. Mr. Busby questioned the operation of the shelter. He said there was no one in authority on site and the facility provided no services to the homeless residents. He said Truth and Transitions was a for-profit business that made money off of the homeless residents. Mr. Busby stated there were 4-6 cars at the site each night and the site was a mile from the nearest bus stop. He said T & T was not connected to any other social service agency. He compared T & T’s plan to allow the homeless residents to work off their rent payment to indentured servitude or slavery. Mr. Pousardian responded that his organization worked with Bridgeway and the veterans Administration. Paul Owens, of Truth and Transitions, stated he was a recovering addict who now wanted to pay back the help that had been given to him. He stated the organization did not make money off of the residents. Mr. Owens stated they wanted to provide help to those who needed it. He stated he helped the residents find jobs. Robert Steele, a program administrator with the State Department of Human Services, shared a story of a DHS client who had successfully transitioned out of a DHS facility and through T & T’s shelter. He stated Truth and Transitions had services available to help their residents. In response to a question form Commissioner Hamilton, Mr. Pousardian stated this was Truth and Transitions’ only facility. Commissioner May commented that he applauded T & T’s efforts but he could not support the current application at this site. A motion was made to approve the CUP application, including all staff comments and conditions except the recommendation of denial. The vote was 0 ayes, 9 noes and 2 absent. The motion failed and the application was denied. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 6 FILE NO.: Z-9236 NAME: TBA Holdings Accessory Dwelling – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 127 Vernon Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: TBA Holdings, LLC/Todd and Allison Baker PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to recognize the existing accessory dwelling located on this R-3 zoned lot. 1. SITE LOCATION: The property is located on the east side of Vernon Avenue, mid-block, south of West Markham Street. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: This immediate neighborhood is characterized by a variety of residential uses; including single family, duplexes and multi-family dwellings. The accessory dwelling has existed for many years. Both dwellings on this property have been rental units for several years. The existing accessory dwelling and the rental of both dwellings is compatible with the residential uses in the area. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the Capitol View – Stifft Station Neighborhood Association. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The principal dwelling and accessory dwelling each require one parking space. There is space for two parking spaces off of the alley at the rear of the property. On street parking is also available. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: No Comments. 5. PUBLIC WORKS: No Comments. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9236 2 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: Lot may not be subdivided unless separate sewer service with easement is provided. Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. Service is already being provided to this property from the rear of the property with no apparent conflicts with existing facilities. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. Centerpoint Energy: No comments received. AT&T: No comments received. Central Arkansas Water: No objection Fire Department: No comments. Building Codes: No comment. County Planning: No comments. Rock Region METRO: a) Location is served nearby on Route 1- Pulaski Heights & Route 8 – Rodney Parham. We have no objections to the conditional use of an accessory dwelling at this location. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY 12, 2017) The applicants, Allison and Todd Baker, were present. Staff presented the item and noted little additional information was needed. In response to a question the applicants responded that there were not separate utilities. The applicants stated they had bought the property in April 2017 as two existing rental units and were not aware that the property was not properly zoned. Staff informed the Committee that a variance was being requested from the code provision that the property owner reside on the property. The Committee determined there were no other issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9236 3 STAFF ANALYSIS: The R-3 zoned lot located at 127 Vernon Avenue is occupied by a two-story single family residence and an accessory building. Both structures were built in the early 1930’s. The accessory building at the rear of the property contains an accessory dwelling. It is unclear when the accessory building was converted into a dwelling but it was several years ago. The current owners acquired the property in April 2017. They purchased the property for investment purposes as it was marketed as two rental dwellings. Only after purchasing the property did they become aware that the accessory dwelling had never been approved by zoning. The property is located in an area that is characterized by a variety of dwelling types; including single family, two family and multifamily. Some of those uses are on properly zoned properties and several are nonconforming such as a duplex across the street and a 5-unit apartment one lot to the north. The applicants are requesting a variance from the code provision that the property owner reside on the property when an accessory dwelling is located on an R-3 zoned property. Recognizing and allowing the continued use of the accessory dwelling and single family residence is compatible with the uses in the neighborhood. No separate utilities are requested. The applicants stated that they were informed by the Circuit Clerk’s office that no bill of assurance was available. Young’s Park Addition is most likely typical of subdivisions platted in the early 1900’s in that the plat/bill of assurance did not address use issues pertinent to this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP, subject to compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends approval of a variance from the code provision that the property owner reside on the site. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicants were present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval, as outlined in the “staff recommendation” above. Staff also recommended approval of a variance from August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9236 4 the code provision that the property owner reside on the site. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved, including the variance, by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 7 FILE NO.: Z-9238 NAME: Pettigrew Day Care Center – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 3101 Asher Avenue OWNER/APPLICANT: Yousef Quattom/Anthony Pettigrew PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow a day care center to be located in the existing building on this R-2 zoned lot. 1. SITE LOCATION: The property is located on the southwest corner of Asher Avenue and Johnson Street, across from Calvary Cemetery. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The property is located in an area of mixed residential and commercial uses. The building was for many years occupied as a neighborhood grocery store. Other uses in the immediate area include Calvary and Roselawn Cemeteries, located to the north and east of the site. Allowing a day care to occupy this R-2 zoned commercial building and site is an appropriate use that is compatible with the neighborhood. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the Goodwill and Love Neighborhood Associations. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The day care is proposed to have an enrollment of 45 children with 3 staff persons on duty at any one time. The parking requirement is 7 parking spaces. The property has access from both Asher Avenue and Johnson Street. The property contains a nonconforming gravel parking lot with sufficient room for the required 7 spaces and for drop-off/pickup area. Staff believes it is now appropriate to upgrade the parking lot to meet current paving and landscaping standards. Staff will support an 18 month deferral of those requirements. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: Site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9238 2 Any new site development shall adhere to the current landscape code. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 5. PUBLIC WORKS: 1. The City of Little Rock recently purchased right-of-way on Asher Ave to sufficiently address the Master Street Plan standard. No additional right-of-way is required to be provided. The property survey should be updated to show the purchase. 2. A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Asher Ave and Johnson St. 3. Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plan specifies that Johnson Street for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline starting on the south side of the existing building to the south property line. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: Sewer available to this s ite. Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. There are a couple street light poles in the vicinity of the proposed fenced, playground area. They should not create any conflicts with the proposed use. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Centerpoint Energy: No comments received. AT&T: No comments received. Central Arkansas Water: No objection Fire Department: Full plans review Building Codes: Project is a change in occupancy and is therefore subject to current building code requirements. Review and approval is required by Building Codes Division before occupancy takes place. For information on submittal August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9238 3 requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey@littlerock.org or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.org. County Planning: No comments. Rock Region METRO: a) Location is served nearby on route 16 UALR. We have no objection to the conditional use of a daycare center at this location. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY 12, 2017) The applicant was present. Staff presented the item and noted the need for additional information. Staff requested the maximum enrollment, number of employees, days and hours of operation and a signage plan. Staff asked what portion of the building would be occupied by the day care and what use would occupy the remainder of the building. Staff requested that any proposed dumpster and required screening be indicated on the site plan. Staff stated a properly paved and landscaped parking lot was required. It was discussed that a reasonable deferral of the paving requirement could be requested since there was an area of gravel parking on the property. Public Works and other agency comments were noted. Staff explained the right- of-way dedication requirement. The Committee instructed the applicant to provide responses to staff issues by July 19. The item was forwarded to the full Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: The “R-2” zoned property located at 3101 Asher Avenue is occupied by a 3,030 square foot frame structure. The two-story portion of the structure contains 2,240 square feet (1,120 per floor) and was constructed in 1925. In 1950, a 789 square foot “lean-to” addition was added to the building. The structure may have been constructed as a neighborhood grocery with living space above. In any case, the building had a long history of commercial use, including retail sales and a grocery. It has been vacant for some time now. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9238 4 The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a day care center to be located on the first floor of the building. The second floor will only be used for storage space. The day care is proposed to have a maximum enrollment of 45 children with 3 employees on site at any one time. Proposed days and hours of operation are Monday through Saturday, 6:00 a.m. – 11:00 p.m. A fenced playground area is proposed adjacent to the back (south) side of the building. No dumpster is proposed. The site contains a nonconforming gravel parking lot with driveway access off of Asher Avenue and Johnson Street. Staff believes it is now appropriate to bring that parking lot into conformance with city code regarding paving, landscaping and parking lot design. Staff is supportive of an 18 month deferral of those requirements. To staff’s knowledge there are no outstanding issues. The building has a history of use as non-residential. The land use plan for this properties and others along Asher to the west is MX which would support rezoning to allow office/commercial uses. The 1913 plat/bill of assurance for William Gallagher Addition does not address use issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda staff report. 2. Compliance with all applicable Building Code and Fire Department requirements for use of the building for a day care center. 3. Signage is to comply with that allowed in the office and institutional zone s and sign permits must be obtained before any signage is place on the site or building. Staff recommends approval of an 18 month deferral of the requirement to install a paved and landscaped parking lot to comply with code standards. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff recommendation” above. Staff also recommended approval of an 18 month deferral of the requirement to install a paved and landscaped parking lot to comply August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-9238 5 with code standards. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved, including the paving and landscaping deferral, by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 8 FILE NO.: G-25-220 Name: West 65th Street Name Change to Hindman Park Way Location: West 65th Street, West of University Avenue Petitioner: City of Little Rock Request: To change the name of West 65th Street, West of University Avenue to Hindman Park Way Abutting Uses: Twenty-seven (27) properties have an address on this portion of West 65th Street. The uses consist of twenty-three single family residences and four churches. Hindman Park is located at the western terminus of the road. The park actually has an address of 60 Brookview Drive, a residential street that extends north off of West 65th Street. Neighborhood Effect: Mailing addresses will change for those affected. It is hoped that the name change will result in more patrons of the park utilizing the entry off of the end of West 65 th Street (Hindman Park Way) rather than the entrance that is accessed off of Brookview Drive, a residential street . Neighborhood Position: Signatures in support of the name change were submitted representing seventeen (17) of the twenty-seven (27) addresses. Notice was sent to occupants of all of the addresses. Notice was also sent to SWLR United for Progress, South Brookwood – Ponderosa Neighborhood Association and Meadowcliff – Brookwood Neighborhood Association. Public Service Agencies Comments: Public Works: 1. The proposed Parkway suffix does not conform to CLR adopted street naming and property numbering system in 1988. It is suggested the proposed street name be “Hindman Park Way” be used instead. 2. Data is being compiled by staff on the # of street name signs to be replaced and the associated cost. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Little Rock Water Reclamation Authority: No comment. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 8 (Cont.) FILE NO.: G-25-220 2 Entergy: Entergy does not object to this proposal. After the change is made, then Entergy’s mapping system will be updated with the revised Street name through the normal notification process. Centerpoint Energy: No comments received. AT&T: No comments received. Central Arkansas Water: No objection Fire Department: No comment. Building Codes: No comment. County Planning: No comments. Rock Region METRO: a) Location is served by METRO on multiple routes in this neighborhood. We suggest the name change be denied. Changing road names creates confusion when navigating the road network. METRO has numerous pieces of collateral materials we supply to our passengers which would need to be reprinted. Our web and app information will need to be updated. All of these items are necessary as with the name change from 2016 on Springer Boulevard. They cost METRO money. b) We suggest in honoring an individual or group with a street name; the name be appended keeping both the original name and the honorary name. It would make it easier for the public to adopt over time. For example: West 106 th St, Duke Ellington Boulevard or as in this case; West 65th St, Hindman Parkway. If informational materials remained in circulation for a while at least others will understand where the location is addressed. By adding the name and keeping the original people will understand where they are going instead of changing the street name mid-trip. The City of Little Rock, through the City’s Parks and Recreation Department, is proposing to rename that portion of West 65th Street located west of University Avenue to Hindman Park Way. Hindman Park is located at the western terminus of the road. A gated entrance is located on the park property past the end of the street. A second gated entrance is located at the end of Brookview Drive which extends north off of West 65 th Street. Access to that second entrance is through the neighborhood along a residential street. The goal of the proposed name change is to help better identify the entrance off of the end of West 65th Street (proposed Hindman Park Way) and to reduce traffic through the neighborhood on Brookview Drive. August 3, 2017 ITEM NO.: 8 (Cont.) FILE NO.: G-25-220 3 Hindman Park has an address of 60 Brookview Drive, although the club house actually has an address of 7500 West 65th Street. The Parks Department will work with the appropriate Public Works staff to eliminate the Brookview Drive address and to assign an address on Hindman Park Way. This should further enhance the goal of encouraging traffic to use the primary street for access. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to change the name of that portion of West 65th Street located west of University Avenue to Hindman Park Way. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 3, 2017) Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval of the proposed street name change to Hindman Park Way. There were no persons present to speak either for or against the proposal. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. DATE A V PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE RECORD � VS�; " ,L v� i MEMBER ti BERRY, CRAIG o BUBBUS, ALAN BYNUM, BUELAH COX, KEITH DILLON, JANET FINNEY, REBECCA HAMILTON, SCOTT 0� LAHA, TROY LATTURE, PAUL MAY, BILL B. s STEBBINS, ROBERT MEMBER BERRY, CRAIG BUBBUS, ALAN BYNUM, BUELAH COX, KEITH DILLON, JANET FINNEY, REBECCA HAMILTON, SCOTT LAHA, TROY LATTURE, PAUL MAY, BILL B. STEBBINS, ROBERT Meeting Adjourned � �� P.M. V' AYE � NAYE 'ABSENT �faABSTAIN �RECUSE August 3, 2017 There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m. �" W 1 J a6L,(mac Chairman