boa_01 30 2017LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
JANUARY 30, 2017
2:00 P.M.
Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being four (4) in number.
Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings
The Minutes of the December 12, 2016 meeting were
approved.
Members Present: Frank Allison
Carolyn Lindsey Polk
Jeff Yates, Chairman
Christopher Smith
Members Absent: Robert Tucker, Vice Chairman
City Attorney Present: Debra Weldon
LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
JANUARY 30, 2017
2:00 P.M.
OLD BUSINESS:
No Old Business
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Z -7560-A
500 Valmar Street
2. Z-9189
5211 Kavanaugh Blvd.
3. Z-9190
7811 DePriest Road
4. Z-9191
6 Valley Forge Drive
5. Z-9192
10 Bordeaux Court
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 1
File No.: Z -7560-A
Owner: The C Street Group, LLC
Applicant: Lance Levi
Address: 500 Valmar Street
Description: Southwest corner of Valmar Street and Capitol Avenue
Zoned: R-3
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section
36-255 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to
allow enclosure of an existing porch with reduced front
setback and which crosses a front platted building line, and a
porch addition with reduced side setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-3 zoned property at 500 Valmar Street is occupied by a one-story frame single
family residence. The property is located at the southwest corner of Valmar Street
and Capitol Avenue. The property contains 15 foot front (north) and side (east)
platted building lines, as the property along with the property immediately to the
west, was replatted a number of years ago. The residence contains an existing
covered, unenclosed porch (6.2 feet by 14.5 feet) on the north side of the structure
and an existing deck (10 feet by 10 feet) at the southwest corner of the house. The
deck is in the rear yard area and is uncovered and unenclosed. The existing porch
on the north side of the house has a front setback of nine (9) feet to 9.5 feet, crossing
the front platted building line by 5.5 to six (6) feet.
The applicant is in the process of constructing a new front porch on the east end of
the residence, as noted on the attached site plan. As part of the remodeling project,
the applicant proposes to enclose the porch on the north side of the residence for
additional living space. The porch enclosure will maintain the existing front setback.
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.)
The applicant also proposes to reconstruct the deck at the southwest corner of the
house. The deck will remain uncovered and unenclosed. The deck will maintain the
same four (4) foot side setback (west side) as the existing deck. New steps will
extend from the south side of the deck into the rear yard area.
Sections 36-255(d)(1) and (2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum
front setback of 25 feet and a minimum side setback of five (5) feet. Section 31-
12(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that building line encroachments be
reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the building additions
with reduced front and side setbacks and which crosses a front platted building line.
Staff is supportive of the requested setback and building line variances. Staff views
the request as reasonable. The porch enclosure and deck reconstruction will
maintain the same building foot print as currently exists. The new front porch on the
east end of the residence complies with ordinance standards. This general area
contains a mixture of lot orientations, with some lots running north/south and others
running east/west. The subject property was originally platted with the side yard
running along Capitol Avenue (north). When the lots were replatted, the orientation
was changed. Staff feels that the existing orientation of the house is compatible with
the general area. Staff believes that enclosure of the existing porch and
reconstruction of the existing deck will have no adverse impact on the adjacent
properties or general area.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete
a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line for the addition.
The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to
determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line variances,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Completion of a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted
building line as approved by the Board.
2. The deck at the southwest corner of the residence must remain uncovered
and unenclosed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(January 30, 2017)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
I
1/12/2017
Subject: 500 Valmar 72205
City of Little Rock,
-T�� /
Z- 75-6o-§4
I am proposing to enclose an existing covered porch to add a bathroom and bedroom closet. I am not
adding to the existing footprint.
Thank you,
Lance Levi
501-960-3462
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 2
File No.: Z-9189
Owner: Christenson Living Trust
Applicant: Larry R. Troillett
Address: 5211 Kavanaugh Blvd.
Description: Lot 13, Block 1, McGehee Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section
36-156 to allow construction of an accessory building with
reduced street side setback and increased rear yard
coverage.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
0
Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 5211 Kavanaugh Blvd. is occupied by a two-story frame
single family residence. The property is located at the southeast corner of
Kavanaugh Blvd. and Newton Street. There is a two -car wide carport at the south
end of the residence and a small metal storage building in the rear yard area. Access
to the carport is via Newton Street which essentially functions as an alley. An alley
right-of-way runs along the south property line.
The applicant proposes to remove the carport and small storage building and
construct a new one-story addition to the rear of the residence, as noted on the
attached site plan. As part of the project, the applicant proposes to construct a 20.67
foot by 23 foot (475 square feet) detached garage in the rear yard area. There will
be a small covered walkway between the addition and garage. The proposed
building addition will include a covered patio area. The addition will conform to the
minimum setback requirements from the side and rear property lines. The proposed
detached garage will be located one (1) foot to 1.5 feet back from the rear (south)
property line and 3.5 to 4.5 feet back from the west (street side) property line. The
garage will be separated from the house (new addition) by approximately 6.2 feet.
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.)
The proposed garage will cover approximately 38 percent of the required rear yard
area (rear 25 feet of the lot).
Section 36-156(a)(2)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum street
side setback of 15 feet for accessory structures in R-2 zoning. This section also
allows a maximum rear yard coverage of 30 percent (rear 25 feet of the lot).
Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to
allow the detached garage with reduced street side setback and increased rear yard
coverage.
Staff is supportive of the requested street side setback and rear yard coverage
variances. Staff views the request as reasonable. The proposed detached garage
will not be out of character with the overall Heights neighborhood area, with respect
to setbacks and coverage. There are a number of accessory garage structures in
this area with rear yard coverages ranging from 30 to 50 percent. Additionally, the
Newton Street right-of-way functions as an alley. It has a very narrow one -lane of
pavement with no curb and gutter. There are several accessory structures located
along the Newton Street right-of-way, with driveways accessing several residential
properties. Staff believes that the proposed accessory garage structure will have no
adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested street side setback and rear yard
coverage variances, as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(January 30, 2017)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
2
November 9, 2016
Little Rock Department of Planning and Development
723 W. Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas
Re: Application for Residential Zoning Variance
I am an architect writing this letter on behalf of my clients Stephen and Debbra
Christenson. I am hereby requesting a residential rear yard area coverage variance for the
residence of Stephen and Debbra Christenson at 5211 Kavanaugh Blvd, Little Rock, AR 72207.
(LOT 13, Block 1, McGehee Addition)
This home was designed and built in the 1940's and originally had a single car detached
garage. The current owners tore down the boarded up single car garage and added a single car
carport in its place in 2002. They are in need of a larger garage in both length and width to
accommodate their 2 vehicles, one of which is nearly 22 feet long. If we limit the size of the
garage to 30 percent of the rear yard area, the garage could only accommodate a single car.
As allowed by the zoning ordinance we will be setting our garage at the rear of the house
and just inside the property line due to the fact that we have an alley adjoining the lot. Our plan
includes a small addition to the house and the free standing garage with entry off of the alley
(Newton St.). The size of the new garage will accommodate their two vehicles. We plan to have
an open but covered connecting link from the house over to the garage. The area of the garage
and the portion of the connecting link not within the rear yard setback will be 40% of the rear yard
area. See enclosed site plan. Thus we are asking for the variance to exceed the 30% rear yard
coverage limitation by an additional 10 percent.
Sincerely,
Larry R. Troillett, AIA
5 Catina Ct.
Little Rock, Ar 72211
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 3
File No.: Z-9190
Owner: Mid -Ark Property and Investments, Inc.
Applicant: Otto Beaumont
Address: 7811 DePriest Road
Description: Southwest corner of DePriest Road and Kelli Court
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence provisions of Section
36-516 to allow a fence which exceeds the maximum height
allowed.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
V
Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 7811 DePriest Road is occupied by a one-story brick and
frame single family residence. The property is located on the southwest corner of
DePriest Road and Kelli Court. There is a two -car wide driveway from DePriest
Road which serves as access. The property contains a 25 foot front and street side
platted building line along both street frontages. A five (5) foot wide utility easement
runs along the south and west property lines.
The applicant proposes to construct a six (6) foot high wood fence off the southeast
corner of the residence, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed fence will
extend from the east side of the residence to the southeast corner of the lot, crossing
the 25 foot street side platted building line. The fence will then run along the south
property line, enclosing the rear yard area of the lot. The fence will be located 14
feet back from the edge of pavement of Kelli Court, approximately 3.5 feet inside the
east property line.
Section 36-516(e)(1)a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum fence
height of four (4) feet for fences located between a building setback line and a street
right-of-way. Six (6) foot high fences are allowed elsewhere on residential lots.
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.)
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow that portion of the six (6)
foot high wood fence located between the 25 foot street side platted building line
and the Kelli Court right-of-way.
Staff is supportive of the requested fence height variance. Staff would typically have
concerns with the proposed fence location, based on the fact that the lots
immediately to the south have front yard relationships to Kelli Court. However, in
this case the owners of the two (2) properties immediately to the south at #3 and #5
Kelli Court have signed -off on the proposed fence project. Additionally, if the fence
were kept inside the building line, only a minimal area of rear yard could be fenced.
The applicant notes that the six (6) foot high fence is desired for security purposes.
A similar fence height variance was recently granted for the residence directly across
Kelli Court to the southeast (#8 Kelli Court). Staff believes the proposed six (6) foot
high fence will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general
area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested fence height variance, as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(January 30, 2017)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
2
7811 Depriest Road
Mabelvale, AR 72103
Zoning Variance Cover Letter
-TI, -A3
?- �/ 90
We are requesting a zoning variance for the home located at 7811 Depriest Road
Mabelvale, AR 72103. We are seeking this variance for two primary reasons: 1) to improve the
usefulness of the lot due to its unusual lot configuration, and 2) to improve the safety aspects of
the unusual lot configuration for children playing in their own yard on a corner lot immediately
adjacent to Kelli Court.
A standard six foot privacy fence will improve the occupant families and children piece of
mind. By the very limited options of privacy and security due to the unusual lot configuration
and the building set back requirements this fence would greatly improve property values and
neighborhood aesthetics. Since the property is located on a beautiful large corner lot near the
entrance of the neighborhood a privacy fence would allow us maximum safety, privacy, and
security.
Thank you
MID -ARK Property & Investments, Inc.
PO Box 983
Mabelvale AR, 72103
-2- �rgv
(t13)
Attached are two letters I wrote to describe and explain or desire to build a fence at the 7811
Depriest Road property. While explaining our request to the neighbors to the rear of the property
they both accepted our proposed plan verbally as described and acknowledged that that
acceptance by signing a copy of the letter. I hope you will accept this a substitute for them
having written their own notes.
Sincerely
Otto Beaumont
MID -ARK Property & Investments, Inc.
7811 Depriest Rd
Mabelvale, AR 72103
Dear Neighbor
�. ;rev v_��1 3\
We are requesting a zoning variance to enclose the backyard for safety reasons at 7811
Depriest Road. Families with children will be living in the home and this safety improvement is
not limited to the restriction of the children to the newly enclosed space but to potential outside
threats including, but not limited to, area traffic. As all can see it is a very visible yard when you
enter the neighborhood and as such we feel this is a reflection of our commitment to the
community in place.
We would like enclose a portion of the yard at 7811 Depriest Rd with a six foot privacy
fence. The proposed fence would be from the mid -point of the house on the east side. It would
then move 13 feet east to a 90 degree turn to the south running parallel to the home until the
fence is approximately 14 feet from the curb, and then turn back to the southeast running parallel
with Kelli Court. At the rear property line the fence would turn to the west and follow the
property line terminating at the intersection of the other fences of the adjacent Properties.
We believe this fence will be both visually attractive as well as provide an enhancement of
the property values in the neighborhood. It will also provide an additional element of security not
only to our yard but to any adjacent property.
To accommodate the property directly to the south on Kelli Court whose driveway is
immediately adjacent to the Depriest Road property we choose to keep the fence set back 14 feet
for a sufficient sight line when moving into and out of the driveway.
7811 Depriest Rd
Mabelvale, AR 72103
Dear Neighbor
We are requesting a zoning variance to enclose the backyard for safety reasons at 7811
Depriest Road. Families with children will be living in the home and this safety improvement is
not limited to the restriction of the children to the newly enclosed space but to potential outside
threats including, but not limited to, area traffic. As all can see it is a very visible yard when you
enter the neighborhood and as such we feel this is a reflection of our commitment to the
community in place.
We would like enclose a portion of the yard at 7811 Depriest Rd with a six foot privacy
fence. The proposed fence would be from the mid -point of the house on the east side. It would
then move 13 feet east to a 90 degree turn to the south running parallel to the home until the
fence is approximately 14 feet from the curb, and then turn back to the southeast running parallel
with Kelli Court. At the rear property line the fence would turn to the west and follow the
property line terminating at the intersection of the other fences of the adjacent Properties.
We believe this fence will be both visually attractive as well as provide an enhancement of
the property values in the neighborhood. It will also provide an additional element of security not
only to our yard but to any adjacent property.
To accommodate the property directly to the south on Kelli Court whose driveway is
immediately adjacent to the Depriest Road property we choose to keep the fence set back 14 feet
for a sufficient sight line when moving into and out of the driveway.
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 4
File No.:
Owner/Applicant:
Address:
Description:
Zoned:
Z-9191
Kevin W. Hunt
6 Valley Forge Drive
Lot 134, Pebble Beach Park Addition
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section
36-254 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to
allow an unenclosed porch addition with a reduced front
setback and which crosses a front platted building line.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 6 Valley Forge Drive is occupied by a two-story brick and
frame single family residence. The property is located on the north side of Valley
Forge Drive, east of Valley Park Drive. A two -car wide driveway from Valley Forge
Drive is located at the southeast corner of the lot. The driveway serves a two -car
garage at the east end of the residence. The lot contains a 25 foot platted front
building line.
The applicant proposes to construct a 10 foot by 38 foot porch on the front of the
residence, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed porch addition will be
unenclosed on its east, west and south sides. The proposed porch will be located
15.6 feet back from the front (south) property line, and maintain the same 9.6 foot
side (west) setback as the existing house. The proposed porch will cross the 25 foot
front platted building line by 9.4 feet. The existing house currently has no front porch,
only a small uncovered concrete stoop. The applicant notes that the new front porch
is needed to provide easier access to the residence based on medical issues.
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.)
Section 36-254(d)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front
setback of 25 feet. Section 31-12(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that
building line encroachments be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to
allow the porch addition with reduced front setback and which crosses a front platted
building line.
Staff is not supportive of the requested front setback and building line variances.
Staff feels that support cannot be given based on the existing front setbacks for the
other residences to the east and west, along this side of Valley Forge Drive. Staff
believes that the proposed encroachment for the new porch will be too much out of
character with this immediate area, and could provide an adverse visual impact on
the adjacent properties.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete
a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line for the addition.
The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to
determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested front setback and building line variances.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(January 30, 2017)
Staff informed the Board that the application needed to be deferred to the February 27,
2017 agenda, based on the fact that the applicant failed to complete the notifications to
surrounding property owners.
A motion was made to defer the application to the February 27, 2017 agenda. The vote
was 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. The application was deferred.
I
12/12/2016
(8674 unread) - hungjr@att.net - att.net Mail
All
[No Subject]
r—-. --- ;, „,.<:,: ,..;:.._.., Today at 9:42 Ann
—.— .....,....I ........ Today at 9:42 AM
To ..
Department of Planning and Development
723 W Markham St.
Little Rock, AR
To all concerned
I would like to detail my proposal and justification for
requesting a variance of the Zoning Ordinance.
I would like to put a covered porch in front of the house for
safety and convenience. Smaller steps, railings, and a
covering for the steps and door would improve easier access
to my front door. After two spinal surgeries, and both knees
replaced, it is difficult to use the front entrance without
someones help. I look forward being able to go outside to
relax on a level surface. An easement variance of ten feet out
from the house, and a ten foot roof covering would make this
possible.
I appreciate your consideration to make this possible.
Than Yo �f
Kevin W Hunt
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 5
File No.: Z-9192
Owner: Bill Greenwood
Applicant: Pat McGetrick
Address: 10 Bordeaux Court
Description: Lot 771, St. Charles Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section
36-254 and the easement provisions of Section 36-11 to
allow a deck addition with reduced rear setback and which
encroaches into a utility easement.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Utility Issues:
AT&T: No objection to easement encroachment.
CenterPoint Energy: No objection to encroachment.
Central Arkansas Water: Approves with no comments.
Entergy: No objection to easement encroachment.
Little Rock Wastewater: No objection. No facilities located in rear yard area.
C. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 10 Bordeaux Court is occupied by a two-story brick and
frame single family residence. The property is located near the end of a cul-de-sac
street. A two -car wide driveway from Bordeaux Court serves as access to the
property. The property slopes downward from side to side (west to east) and front
to back (south to north). The lot contains a 15 foot front platted building line, with a
7.5 foot wide utility easement along the rear (north) property line. There is also a 25
foot wide "natural buffer" which runs through the rear yard area. The property backs
up to an open space tract.
JANUARY 30, 2017
ITEM NO.: 5 (CON'T.)
There are existing deck and patio structures on the rear of the residence, as noted
on the attached site plan. There are two (2) existing upper deck areas, with steps
down to a patio area between the decks. The decks are uncovered and unenclosed
and are located seven (7) feet to 15 feet back from the rear (north) property line.
The decks are located 11 feet to over 40 feet from the side property lines. The
northeast corner of the deck structure encroaches into the rear utility easement by
a few inches.
Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear
setback of 25 feet. Section 36-11(f) requires that easement encroachments be
reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting variances to allow the existing deck structures with reduced rear setback
and easement encroachment. The encroachments were recently "flagged" due to a
proposal to sell the property.
Staff supports the requested rear setback and easement variances. Staff views the
request as reasonable. The existing deck structure has probably existed since the
house was built or shortly thereafter. The lot has a relatively shallow depth ranging
from 107 feet to 127 feet. The typical single family lot depth is 140 feet or greater.
The property backs up to an open space tract which ranges in width of 20 feet to
over 50 feet. Therefore, the lot has the appearance of having a larger rear yard
area. As noted in paragraph B., all of the utility companies support the minor
easement encroachment. Additionally, the St. Charles Architectural Control
Committee recently visited and reviewed the property and expressed no issues with
the deck structures. A letter from the St. Charles ACC is attached. Staff feels that
the letter also addresses the "natural buffer" issue, as the buffer is a neighborhood
issue and not a city zoning issue. Staff believes the placement of the existing deck
structures will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general
area.
D. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested rear setback and easement
encroachment variances, subject to the existing deck structures remaining
uncovered and unenclosed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(January 30, 2017)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
2
.gyp � ems_
December 12, 2016
Monte Moore
City of Little Rock, Arkansas
Planning and Development
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
Re: Request to Board of Adjustment Action on #10 Bordeaux
Dear Mr. Moore:
-L 94'`... _.
We are herewith submitting a Request for Board of Adjustment Action on #10 Bordeaux. Two decks
were constructed for this house approximately 18 years ago, that encroached into the 25 -foot rear
setback. The corner of the larger deck encroaches into the 7 1/2 -foot easement by approximately 1
foot. The 25 -foot rear setback is also a buffer area for the St. Charles Property Owners' Association.
have submitted a letter from this Association stating that they accept the decks in this setback area.
would request that the BOA approve the variance submitted.
If you have any questions regarding the information provided, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerel
M cGrOtr" cGe
Patrick M. r----_—_
PM:cmc
.i6o Bass Pro Parkway
Little Rock, AR 7220
591 455-8899
501-455-0525
,mcgetrick2@sbeglobal.net
ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
P.O. BOX 21664
LITTLE ROCK AP 72221-1664 l!
December 6, 2016
Mr. & Mrs. Bill Greenwood
Lot 771
10 Bordeaux Court
Little Rock AR 72211
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Greenwood,
The St. Charles Architectural Control Committee (ACC) members have executed a site
visit of your property as well as have reviewed the most recent survey of your property,
which you provided to as. The St. Charles Community Association ACC has no issues
with the existing placement of either of your decks.
If the new owners desire to make changes to the existing property, they should complete
the required ACC request forms found on the St. Charles Community Association
website at wwtiv.stcharleslr.com, complete those and submit them for review at least 30
days in advance of the intended work.
If you have any questions, please contact us at stcharleslrfi&hotmail.com or via the
message line at 501.2241083.
Sincerely,
Suzanne Sage
St. Charles Community Association
cc: St. Charles Community Association ACC
DATE: -fr+lj � JA/- -/ -5 /) , Z -6 1 `1
MEMBER
ALLISON; FRANK
LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN
SMITH, CHRISTOPHER
TUCKER, ROBERT
YATES, JEFF
TIME IN AND TIME OUT
ALLISON, FRANK -J 4
LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN
SMITH, CHRISTOPHER
TUCKER, ROBERT
YATES, JEFF
AYE 0 NAYE 4 ABSENT _ALABSTAIN Meeting Adjourned --�216 P.M.
JANUARY 30, 2017
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:06
P. M.
Date:
wz;
Chairman TJ U