Loading...
pc_10 09 1990subLITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION HEARING S~Y AND MINUTE RECORD OCTOBER 9,1990 1."00 p.m. I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum. A Quorum was present being ten in number. II.Approval of the Minutes of the previous meeting, The minutes of the August 28,1990 meeting vere appx'oved asreceived. III.Membexs present.:Maxtha Millex. Fred Pexkins,Vice Chairman Rose Collins Zerilyn Nicholson Kathleen Oleson John McDaniel Brad Walker. Connie Whitfield Stephen Leek Joe Selz Membexs Absent".Walter Riddick,III City Attorney:Stephen Giles LITTLE ROCK PLANNING CGHNISSIQN SUBDIVISION AGENDA OCTOBER 9,1998 DEFERRED ITEMS: A.Big R/Arktic Ice Replat (S-859) PRELININART PLATS: 1.Longlea Manor Phase V (S-128EE) REPLAT: 2.James T.Bates Replat (S-87G) REZONING'. 3.West Narkham and Old Town Road "8-3"to "C-1"(Z-5364) CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: 4,Stagecoach Road C.U.P (Z-4283-A) 5.West Narkham Street C.U.P (Z-5364-A) 6.Geyer Springs Road First Baptist Church C,U.P.(Z-5365) Little Rock,Arkansas I I 't 3 I 4 f I I H I I I'W~tw CQtlllTT eQsacmtCoper& IL I ' Prepared'y the Planning Department City Ot Little Rock ++++LITTLE,RGCK PLANNING CGMMISSIGN SUBDIVISIGN AGENDA OCTOBER 9,1990 October 9,199G SUBDIVISION ITEN NO,:A PILE NO,:8-859 NANE".Big R/Arktic Ice Replat IQCATIGN:NE cornex of Bond and 9th Stxeets DEVELOPER:ENGINEER: Axktic Ice,Inc.Summexlin Associates,Inc. 1699 S.BroadwayLittleRock,AR 72205 376-1323 AREA:B.U Acre NUMBER GF LOTS:2 PT.NEN STREET:O ZONING:I-3 PROPOSED USES:Warehouses PLANNING DISTRICT:I-3G CENSUS TRACT:3 VARIANCES RE UESTED: 1.Naiver of Building Setbacks PLAT DEFICIENCIES NOTED: a.Source of Tit.le Deed Book and Page.b.Adjacent.Subdivisions,Names-Plat Book and Page Numbex'.c.Acreage. A.PROPOSAL RE UEST: This Developer proposes the creation of two industriallotsout.of a larger lct presently zoned "1-3"'. B.EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is currently occupied by several structures. Two buildings located on the south part of the tract. are in a state of extreme disrepair.The site is pa~ed in asphalt..The adjacent streets axe developed to City standards. C.ENGINEERING COMMENTS: Provide Collectox Street.R/M and impx'ovements for Bondstreet,,Improvements for E.9th Street and Reichardt Street.are reguixed unless these stx'eats are closed. 1 October 9,1990 SUBDIVISION ITEN NO.A Continued D.ISSUES LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN: There are no apparent.legal issues except the basic ordinance requirements that have been omitted from the plat..There are several design issues relative to the building lane where they should be established and where the developer requests them to be waived. Sidewalks and R/W need to be shown on the plat and thelastoneistheneedforspecificwaiverrequest.onstreetimprovements. E.ANALYSIS: The Planning Staff review of this replat.indicates few design issues.The points made in Item D and C above are the primary concerns of Staff and Engineering Department.The right-of-way and sidewalks presence on the plat are important to evaluate existing conditions and master street needs. The remaining design issue to be identified by the Engineer„is the building lines.We feel the building lines should be established on street frontages and also be shown where developer requests them to be waived. Gur last point.of concern is that.the Engineering Staff suggested to close E.9th and Reichardt Streets.The applicant needs to file applicat.ion for street. abandonment with Anna Brown at the Planning Office. F.STAFF RECGNNENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this replat subject to complying with the Engineering and Planning Staff comments. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW".(August 16,199D) Nr .James Summerlin was present representing the application.The Staff recommendation was discussed.Staff suggested to Nr.Summerlin closing 9th andI Reichardt Streets to avoid improvement requirements.Those streets are not serving any purpose.Nr.Summerlin agreed to file a petition with the City Clerk and Anna Brown from PlanningStaff. 2 October 9,1996 SIJBD1VISIGN ITEN NG,A Continued Thexe were several design elements discussed.These dealt pximaxily with the improvements on Bond Street,sidewalks and building lines.Nr.Summerlin agreed to revise this plat. A discussion then moved again to the street.closure issues. The Planning Staff suggested making this a part of the application to include in the Staff's recommendation as being approved„subject to public right.-of-way abandonment and street closure. PLANNING CGNNISSIGN ACTION."(August 28,1990) The Staff told the Commission that the replat needed to be deferred because of a notice deficiency.A mot.ion was madetodeferthisitemtoSeptembex11,1996 Agenda and passed by a vote of 10 eyes,6 nays,and 1 absent.. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(Septembex 11,1990) The Planning Staff reported to the Commission that a request had been made by the applicant for a deferral of this item to the Planning Commission meeting on October 9,1996.This would afford the applicant sufficient time to address the concerns of neighborhood objectors and the Staff recommendations After a brief discussion,the Commission determined the deferxal to be appropriate.A motion to that.effect,was made and passed,by a vote of 16 ayes,6 nays,and 1 abstention (John McDaniel). ENGINEERINC STAFF REPORT:(September 14,1990) The engineer has provided documentation that East 9th Street adjacent to this xeplat is not a dedicated stxeet,but arailroadright-of-way,therefore the requirement for improvements to East.9th Street is no longer in effect. Other engineering requirements from previous xeviews axe unchanged.~ 3 Gctober 9,1990 SUBDIVISIGN ITEN NG.A Continued PLANNING CGNNISSIGN MEETING:(Gctober 9,1990) There were no objectors pxesent.The application was repx'esented by Nr.Summexlin of the Summexlin Association Firm.Nr.Summerlin presented a request that this item be deferred until November 20,1990.Be stated two reasons for the deferral request.These were x'esolut.ion of right-of-way abandonment of Reichardt Street and dealing with the variances that had been requested initially and wex'e not resolved.After a brief discussion,the Commission determined the deferral to November 20 be appropx'iate a motion to that effect was made and passed by a vote of 10 ayes,0 nays„and 1 absent. 4 October 9,1990 SUBDIVISION ITEM NG.:FILE NG*:S-128-EE NAME:Longlea Manor Phase V —Preliminary Plat LOCATION:Off Hinson Road on Gld Gak Drive DEVELOPER:ENGINEER: LAND PROJECTS MARLAR ENGINEERING CG.INC. 11125 Arcade Dr.Suite E 5318 JFKLittleRock,AR 72212 North Little Rock,AR 72116 753-1987 AREA:5.65 Ac.NUMBER OF LOTS:15 FT.NEW STREET:.5 mile ZONING:R-2 PROPOSED USES:Residential PLANNING DISTRICT:Highvay 10 CENSUS TRACT:42.06 VARIANCES RE UESTED: 1.SIDEWALKS 2,DETENTION3.TG ALLOW DEN GAK DR.TO BE 45'IGHT-GF-WAY WITH 24'AVEMENT A.PROPOSAL RE UEST: This proposal consists of a preliminary plat including 15 single family lots.The request is to revise a previously approved Phase V,8 single family,with two acres recently purchased land to be included as a part of the addition. B.EXISTING CONDITIONS. The 5 acres involved in this plat are on moderate sloping ground with a natural grade of 8 to 108.Theexistingterrainisintactvithnaturalfoliage.There are existing streets adj~acent to the subdivision plat providing for the collector street system to serve the Longlea and Secluded Hills neighborhoods. 1 October 9,1990 SUBDIVISION Item No,1 Continued ENGINEERINC CONNENTS. C.Old Oak Drive is a collector on the HSP„60'/W and36'treet required.This project should conform to detention and excavation ordinances. D.ISSUES LEGAL TECH DESIGN: The following points of information should be dealt. with by the Engineer and/or Developer.These are: Gld Gak Drive,should be ident.ified as a collector street with 60'/W and 36'avement. The Staff firmly believes that sidewalks axe an integral part of a residential neighborhood and should be included whex'e x'squired by ordinance. The Engineering Staff oppose detention waiver. The Planning and Engineering Staff support the Engineer's request for Den Gak Drive to be a minor residential street with 45'/W and 24'avement. E.ANALYSIS: The,Staff review of this preliminary plat indicates few design issues.The several points made in Item D above are the primary concerns of Planning and Engineering Departments.The street system to serve this area of the city is an important system,a portion of which is being constructed to the collector standards (Secluded Hills Subdivision)and will be connected to Hwy 10 in the near futuxe. Staff also feels strongly committed to recommending the denial of sidewalk waiver and theix installation where required by Gxdinance,in despite of a previous agreement which waives sidewalks due to the fact that. topography will make sidewalks difficult,to construct. Gur last point.of concern is that the Engineering Staff oppose a Dentention Waiver for this project. F.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the preliminaxy plat subject to the resolution of the several items pointed out in oux analysis. 2 @etcher 9,1990 SUBDIVISIDN Item Ho,1 Continued ,SDBDIVISIDW CDNNITTEE COMMENTS:(September 27,1990j The applicant was represented by Nr.Jim Garner,Nr.Bill Miller and Nr.Nike Narlax.There were a number of questions raised by Nr.Garner as to the Staff comments.He requested clarification of the Staff's comment.specifically dealing with the sidewalks and 60 foot.xight-of-way requixements.His feelings were that the sidewalks and 60 foot xight-of-way requirements had been waived on the previous phases of Longlea Manor and it.also applied to this plat.Nr.Gardner presented a copy of the minute recoxd from the September 1980 Subdivision Agenda meeting showing those agreements between City and the Developer. Commissioner Walker suggested moving d.iscussicn of the sidewalk issue to the Planning Commission meeting.He also advised Nr.Gaxner to locate the nearest sidewalk to show the Planning Commission how impractical it is to require the sidewalks. The xight-of-way xequixement was raised by Bill Miller as to whether the 50 foot right-of-way and 36 foot.pavement.would sexve the purpose.Nx.Jerry Gaxdnex,from Public Works, explained that the master street plan calls for the collector standax'ds with a 60 foot,right-of-way and 36 foot. pavement. lt,was determined that the engineer of the project should meet with Jerry Gardner to discuss the options of reducing requirement right.-of-way standards. The Committee then moved to the discussion of the stoxmwater detention,Nr.Gardner stated that Public Works require waiver of stoxmwater detention on all subdivision.He also stated that.he will advise Nr.Narlar in obtaining proper detention for this project.. The Planning Staff then asked the applicant if the notices had been sent.Mr.Garner responded that he didn"t know about the notice xequirement..He also stated that he wouldliketodiscusstheaboveissuesagainwithhispartnersand possibly choose an already approved plat for this area. Nr.Richard Wood from the Planning Department.„advised the applicant to discuss those issues again and inform the Planning Commission on Gctober 9„1990 about the chosen opt.xon. 3 Gctober 9,1990 SUBDIVISION Item No.1 Continued PLANNING CQNNISSION ACTIQN:(October 9,1990) The Planning Staff reported that.a letter had been submitted by the Engineer„Nr.Forest Narlar,in the required t.ime requesting that this matter be deferred until the November 20,1990 Planning Commission Agenda.The Commission then briefly discussed placing this matter on the Consent.Agenda for deferral.A motion was made to defer this item as requested.The motion passed by a vote cf 10 ayes,0 nays, and,1 absent, October 9,1990 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.."2 FILE NG.:8-870 NAME:James Bates Subdivision —Replat LOCATION:Off Ironton Cutoff on Brewer Road DEVEIOPER:ENGINEER: JAMES BATES BEN KETLER 615 Brewer Road 6133 Dana DriveLittleRock,AR 72206 Little Rock,AR 72206 888-3960 AREA".1.5 Ac.NUMBER OF LOTS".2 FT.NEW STREET:0 ZONING:R-2 PROPOSED USES".Residential PLANNING DISTRICT:Ironton CENSUS TRACT;46,03 VARIANCES RE UESTED: 1.ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 2.SIDEWALKS A,PROPOSAL RE UEST: This applicant proposes the replatting of an existing tract.of land of approximately 1.5 acres into two resident.ial lots.Lot 1 includes one home and one manufactured hou~e and storage building.Lot 2 has one s,ingle family house.The mobile home is vacant and will be removed from this site. B.EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is currently occupied by a residence on each of the two tracts.The adjacent street is to the county standards with 20'f the asphalt.surface. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: C.Applicant should improve Brewer Road oz request waiver of improvements. 1 October 9„1990 SUBDIVISIGN Item No.2 Continued D.ISSUES LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN: The only issue in this category which will require resolution is a need to move the lot line to provide a minimum of 8'ide yard on Lot 1 for the existing house. E.ANALISIS: The Planning Staff finds no sexious fault with the xeplat proposal subject to resolving the issues pointed out in Item C and D above. F.STAFF RECGNNENDATIGN. Staff recommends approval of the replat.subject to the resolution of the issues pointed out by Engineering and Planning Departments. SUBIDIVISIGN CGNNITTEE CGNNENTS:(September 27,1990) The applicant was not present.The Planning Staff offered a brief overview of the rapist.The only issue that.was pointed out in Staff's analysis had already been xesolved. There being no fuxther discussion„the matter was forwarded to the full Commission for resolution. PLANNING CGMMISSIGN ACTIGN:(Gctobex 9„1996) The Staff told,the Commission that.the rapist needed to be deferred because of a notice deficiency.A motion was made to defer this item to Gctober 23,1990 Agenda and passed by a vote of 10 ayes,0 nays,and 1 absent. 2 October 9,199Q Item No.3 —Z-5364 Owner':Robert E.and 'Willa D.Noes Applicant:Flake and Company by Rett. Tucker Locationl West Narkham Street and Gld Town Road Request:Rezone from "G-3"to "C-1" Purpose:Commercial and Upholstery Shop Srze 0.95 acres Existing Use;Vacant SURROUNDING LAMB USE ANB ZONING: North —Commercial,zoned "C-1" South —Multi-Family„zoned "MF-18" East —Auto Sales,zoned "PCB" West —Office and Commercial,zoned "G-3"andi "PCD" STAFF ANALYSIS: The property in question is located at the NE corner of West Narkham and Old Town Road,and the request is to rezone the land from."G-3"to "C-1".The proposal is to replat.the acreage into two lots and to develop the southern tract for an upholstery shop,which is a condit.ional use in the "C-1"district.(A conditional use per'mit.request.has been filed and it is Item No.5 on this agenda). Zoning in the general area includes "R-2""R-5""NF-18""O-3""C-1"and "PCD"The site under consideration shuts a "C-1"parcel to the north and "PCD"to the east..Across Gld Town Road,the existing zoning is "G-3"and 'CD '.Land use in tlhe immediate vicinity is single family,multi- family,a church,office,commercial and a large auto salesfacilitytctheeast.Some of the land is undeveloped atthistimeandthereareseveralestablishedsinglefamily subdivisions to the south. I Octobex',1990 item Na.3 —Z-5364 Continued The adopted plan,Rack Creek Valley,shows the property forofficeuse.Currently„the commercial line is directl.y totheeast,,the western boundary of the "PCD".From the "PCD"to Parkway Place Drive,the land between the Chenal Parkway andi West.Narkham is identified fox'ffice use,and a highpercentageofitiszoned"0-3". Because af the existing land use and developing zoningpattern,it appear.s that.a cammexcial reclassification,is areasonableoptionfarthepxoperty.Adding an acre afcammerciallandshouldnothaveanimpactontheareabecauseafthemajorcommexcialdevelopment.to the east,„ which is an auito dealership with outside display. Staff's pasitian is that.a "C-1"reclassificatian far thesiteisapprapriateandsupportstherequest.Should thePlanningCommissionendarsethex'ezoning,a plan amendmentwillbefarwardedtatheBoardofDirectorsalongwiththerezoning.Staff will recommend that.the plan be changed toshiftthecammerciallinetoOldTawnRaadtorecognizethe"C-1"parcels on the east,side of Old Tawn Road. ENGINEERINS CONNENTS: Mane reported. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval af the "C-1"rezaning as filed. PLANNING COKMISSION ACTION:(October 9,1990) The applicant was present.There were na abjectars and theitemwasplacedantheconsentagenda.A mat.ian was made torecommendapprovalafthe"C-I"rezoning.The matian wasappx'oved by a vote of 10 eyes,0 nays,and 1 absent. 2 October 9,I990 SUBDIVISIONS Item No.4 Name Stagecoach Road —Conditional Use Permit.(2-4283-A) Loca'tion:7825 Stagecoach Road Owner A licant:Alberta 4 Barbra Sparks PROPOSAL: To convert an existing structure for'he use of a commercial catering business. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: SITE LOCATION. This site is located northeast of the intersection of Interstate 43O and the Stagecoach Road exit. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The proposed use is compatible with the neighborhood.A mixture of residential,commercial,day care center,vacant property and a landscaping nursery surround the site. QN-SITE DRIVES AND PARiKING: Access to the site is taken from a gravel drive off of Stagecoach Road.The applicant has nct indicated parking, but enough area is available for several parking spaces. SCREENING AND SUFFERS: The applicant intends on utilizing the existing shrub,trees and landscaping already on the site. CITY ENGINEERING CONNENTS: Provide principal arterial right-of-way and improvements for Stagecoach Road frontage. 1 Gctober 9,1990 SUBDIVISIGNS Item No.4 Continued ANALYSIS: Staff found no problems with the applicant's desired use of the propexty.Previously Bettex Mousetrap Candy Company operated on the site.The structure is in place and the new catering business is presently in operat.ion.The difficulffy with the use occurred when a transfer of the privilege license was attempted for this site.K.C.Catering is the lessee of the site.Past history of this site indicates that several diffex'ent types of commexcial uses have oeprated from the structure. STAFF RECGNNENDATIGN: Appxoval of the Conditional Use Permit.per the engineering commenters SUBDIVISIGN CGNN1TTEE MEETING: The applicant.was in attendance.Jerry Gardner of the Engineering Department explained to the applicant that no right-of-way improvements would be necessary due to the structuxes already being in place.However,the City still would require right.-of-way dedication.The amount of dedication could not be determined until a new survey was obtained showing exactly the dimensions of Stagecoach Road. From the center line of Stagecoach Road,55 feet is requixed to the propexty line. Staff then asked the applicant if there was a problem with the dedicat.ion.The applicant.stated she would have to get. back with her partner befoxe a decision could be made. The applicant left the meeting understanding that submittal of a new suxvey showing the dimensions of Stagecoach Road is being requested along with some right-of-way dedicat.ion. There being no further issues unresolved„this item was sent on to the full Commission fox action. 2 October 9,199O SUBOIVISIONS Item No.4 Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(October 9,1990) A representative of the applicant was in attendance.There were no objectors present..As part of the consent agenda, this item was approved conditioned upon the dedication of right-of-way once a new survey has been reviewed by the Engineering Oepartment.The vote for approval was 1O ayes, O nays,and 1 absent. 3 October 9,1990 SUBDIVISIONS Item No,5 Name:West.Markham Street Conditional Use Permi't (Z-5364-A) Location:The Northeast.corner of Qld Town Road and West.Naxkham Street. Owner A licant:Robert and Willa Nose/Everett Tuckex',III PROPOSAL: To construct a new 3560 sg.ft.building on 1/2 of the corner lot fax an upholstery shop. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: SITE LOCATIG Adjacent to a collector street (West Narkham Street)and Qld Town Road on the northeast.corner. CONPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The site is abutted by commercial uses on the north andeast.West of the site is office„and south is multi- family. ON-SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: Present.l.y the site is vacant.The proposal consist,of an on-site drive to be accessed from Qld Town Road.The required amount of parking spaces will be provided, SCREENING AND BUFFERS: The applicant has indicated that.all xeguixements of the landscape ordinance will be met, CITY ENGINEERING COMMENTS: Extend sidewalk on Narkham to the east.limits of the lot.. Construct a handicap ramp at the street corner.The driveway radius on Old Town should not extend onto the adjacent frontage. 1 October 9,1990 SUEDIVISIONS Item No.5 Continued ANALYSIS: The Staff dace not faresee any adverse impact,an the suxxounding area as a result of the prapased use.A »C-1» Neighborhood Cammercial rezoning has been filed with the Commission. Opex'ation af the propased Ibusiness will be Monday through Friday with hours similar to the surx'ounding business. There will be appraximately six employees.All woxk will be done within the building.Custamexs come to the sales area and select fabric from sample books or obtain estimates. Staff agrees with the camments of Engineering.The frontage driveway aff af'ld Town Road should be reduced appraximately five feet.Sidewalks an the West Narkham Street frantage should be extended beyond the telephane pedestal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject.ta the applicant,dealing the issues af Engineer'ing and pravide far landscaping pex the landscape ordinance. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEETING: The agent.for the applicant was in attendance.Nr.Tucker stated he had no problems with the recommendation af theStaff.Thexe being no unresolved issues,this item was passed an to the full Commission far action. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(October 9,1990) Everett.Tucker was in attendnace ta represent tihe applicant.. There were na objectars pxesent.As part af tlhe cansent. agenda,this item was appxoved ccnditianed upan the Engineer'ing Department issues and landscape reguirements being met.The motion far approval was by a vote of 10 ayes,0 nays,and 1 absent. 2 October',1990 SDBDIVISIONS Item No.6 Name:Geyer Springs First Baptist Chuxch —Conditional Use Permit (Z-5365) Location:12,400 Interstate 30 Ownex A 3.icant:Geyex'prings First Baptist Church/Darrell Odom PROPOSAL: To construct a two story 42,000 sq.ft..education and worship building. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: SITE LOCATION: North of the frontage road on Interstate 30,west of Otter Creek,across fx'om Jacuzzi Brothers„Inc. CONPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD.'he site is surrounded by vacant land and commercial uses. The proposed'.use wil.l be compatible with the surrounding ON-SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The site contains two gravel drives which provide access to the I-30 street frontage.The applicant is proposing over the reguired number of paxking spaces. SCREENING AND BUFFERS." The applicant plans to utilize existing trees as well as provide for any additional landscaping that will be reguired by the new landscape ordinance. CITY ENGINEERING COMMENTS". Engineering is unable to review this application without a survey of the property.Recommend deferral until application is complete, 1 Gctaber 9,1990 SUBDIVISIONS Item Na.6 Continued ANALYSIS: Staff found several problems with the site plan and survey submitted by the applicant..The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area.However,the master parks plan indicates this area as pxiox ity twa for a possible parksite.The site consist of 130+acres,Because of a l.arge floodway,a buildable plateau af 35 acres that is abutted byI-30 will be utilized.The flaadway dedication was waived by the city several months ago.One single family residence exists on the site. STAPF RECQMNENDATIGN: wi.thout the proper material for review,i.e,site plan and survey,Staff x'ecommends a deferral of this item until the November 20,1990 meeting. SVBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEETING: The agent.for the applicant.was in attendance.After reading the Staff recommendatian,the agent agreed ta the deferral because several issues concerning the applicatian had nat been corrected.There heing no further issues„this item was passed on to the full Commission fox action. PLANNINC COMMISSION ACTION:(October 9,1990) Neither the applicant nor a representative was in attendance.Staff infox'med the Commission during the agenda session that.the application was incomplete.Therefax'e, defexxa3.until November 20,1990 was being xecammended byStaff.As part af the consent.agenda,this item was voted an ta be deferred.The mot.ion for approval was by a vote of 10 ayes,0 nays,and 1 absent. 2 PI.ANNING CONNI8 8 IOII VOTE RECORD OmE q'TEN NUN8888 ZONING SUBDIVISION NENHER 1 g3 ki.Riddick,III 8H-P Walker'rad d.McDaniel M.Mi ler a.Nicholson Seiz&Jee S.Seek C.Whitfield K.Oleson cc'~M R,C F,Perkins v'ua 8 wxa Gotober 9,1990 There being no further business before he Co "ssion,the meet.was adjo ed at 1:07 p,m. rman cr ary DATE.