The URL can be used to link to this page

pc_11 05 1991LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION REZONING HEARING MINUTE RECORD NOVEMBER 5,1991 1:00 P.M. I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being eight in number. II.Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting The minutes of the September 24,1991 meeting were approvedasmailed. III.Members Present:Fred Perkins,Chairman John McDaniel Ramsey Ball Jerilyn Nicholson Kathleen OlesonBillPutnam Joe SelzBillWalker Members Absent:Diane Chachere Walter Riddick,III (One Open Position) City Attorney:Stephen Giles REZONING HEARING NOVEMBER 5,1991 DEFERRED ITEM: A.Brandon Conditional Use Permit (Z-5492) REZONING ITEMS: 1.Z-3051-A 3412 and 3414 Mabelvale Pike C-3 to C-1 2.Z-5490 I-30 and Baseline Road R-2 to C-3 3.Z-5496 7214 Cantrell Road C-3 and R-6 to C-4 4.Z-5497 6020 Young Road R-2 to I-2 5.Z-5499 Main Street and Mabelvale Pike R-2 to C-3 OTHER MATTERS: 6.Amendments to Various District Plans 7.Area II Extraterritorial Zoning 8.Adoption of the 1992 Calendar November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:A NAME:Brandon —Conditional Use Permit (Z-5492) LOCATION:707 Towne Oaks Drive OWNER APPLICANT:William A.Brandon PROPOSAL:A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow use of the property for installation of stereo equipment,security systems and window tinting. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1.Site Location This site is located one-half block north of Rodney Parham on the east side of Towne Oaks Drive. 2.Com atibilit with Nei hborhood The site is compatible with the neighborhood.Immediately surrounding the site are commercial uses,however,there are some residential uses in close proximity. 3.On-Site Drives and Parkin There exists on-site a circular drive with access being taken off of Towne Oaks Drive.The site is already paved and stripped for parking.A total of thirty-three parking spaces will be provided. 4.Screenin and Buffers Since the renovation of the building is under fifty percent of the current cost of the structure,landscaping is not required by the landscape ordinance.However,the applicant does plan to restore the landscaping that once existed. 5.Cit En ineer Comments There are no engineering comments to report. 6.6~1 Staff feels that the proposed use will be compatible with the surrounding area.The applicant's plan is to renovate 1 November 5,1991 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.:A Continued the existing building and to install rollup doors,measuring 10 feet by 8 feet,on the rear of the building. The business,Audio Plus,will operate as a retail outlet. This new business will sell and install car stereos, security systems and window tinting for cars,residential and commercial uses. 7.Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit asfiled. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS:(OCTOBER 3,1991) The owner and the applicant were in attendance.Staff gave an overview of what the applicant was requesting.No other discussion took place.This item was sent on to the full Commission for action. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(OCTOBER 22,1991) Staff reported the item needed to be deferred because the applicant failed to notify the required property owners.The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred until the November 5,1991 meeting.The vote was 9 ayes,0 nays, 1 absent and 1 open position. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) The applicant was present.There were no objectors,and the item was placed on the Consent Agenda.A motion was made to approve the conditional use permit as requested.The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays,2 absent and 1 open position. 2 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:1 Z-3051-A Owner:M.G.and Kathleen Edwards Applicant:J.T.Jaynes Location:3412 and 3414 Mabelvale Pike Request:Rezone from C-3 to C-1 Purpose:Multifamily Size:0.32 acres Existing Use:Single Family SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Single-Family,zoned C-3 South —Church,zoned R-3 East —Multifamily,zoned I-2 West —Church,zoned R-3 STAFF ANALYSIS 3412 and 3414 Mabelvale Pike,two 50 foot lots,are currently zoned C-3.The proposal is to convert the existing structures on the property into mulitfamily units.C-3 does not permit any type of residential use.Therefore,areclassificationisnecessarytoaccomplishtheproposed redevelopment.A rezoning to C-1 is being requested becauseitallowsmultifamilyunits(as per R-5 district)and a commercial district appears to be more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. There are a total of three structures,two single family residences and an accessory building,on the two lots.If the C-1 of rezoning is granted,the plan is to remodel and create a total of seven units,which is the maximum number allowed with C-1 rezoning.Density and other regulations for multifamily development is C-1 are the same as those in R-5. The R-5 district allows up to 36 units per acre,however,it also has a lot area per family requirement.For the site in question,a total of 14,000 square feet,2,000 square feet of land area per dwelling unit shall be provided.Consequently, seven is the most number of units that can be placed on the property because of its size.(The parking standard is1.5 spaces per dwelling unit.) 1 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:1 Z-3051-A Cont. Zoning in the area is very mixed and includes R-2,R-3,R-4, 0-1,C-3,C-4 and I-2.Basically,the full spectrum of zoning districts is found in the area and there is no established pattern.The property area under consideration abuts C-3 on the north and R-3 on the south and west.Land use is similar to the zoning and ranges from single family to industrial.In the immediate vicinity land use is single family,multifamily,a church and industrial. Redeveloping the lots for multifamily units is a reasonable option for the land.Also,the proposed use will probably add to the life expectancy of the structures and decrease the possibility of creating two more vacant lots east of University Avenue.Reclassifying the site to C-1 should not have any impact on the surrounding properties and staff supports the rezoning. The Fourche District Plan identifies the southern lot for public/institutional use and the other one for industrial.Staff's position is that the requested rezoning will not change the plan's direction because the land use element recognizes the area for mixed uses. ENGINEERING COMMENTS 1.Mabelvale Pike is classified as a minor arterial,which requires a right-of-way at 45 feet from the centerline. Dedication of additional right-of-way is needed because the existing right-of-way is only 20 feet from the centerline.(A variance from Master Street Plan standard will probably be needed because of dedication of 25 feet takes a portion of the structure on the northern lot.It appears that 20 feet would be sufficient for any future improvements to roadway.) 2.The rear portion of the property is in the 100 year floodplain. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the C-1 rezoning request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) J.T.Jaynes was present.There were two objectors present. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning as filed. Mr.Jaynes stated that he wants to convert the existing structures on the property into seven apartment units. 2 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:1 Z-3051-A Cont. Mr.William Buddenberg,owner of a business on Mabelvale Pike,was concerned with an increase in traffic congestion. Mr.Joe Hillard,representing other adjoining businesses on Mabelvale Pike,was also concerned about traffic on Mabelvale Pike. Mr.Jerry Gardner of Public Works stated that a proposed multifamily use would generate less traffic than any commercial establishment at this location. Commissioner Nicholson questioned Mr.Jaynes'bility to provide enough parking for seven apartment units.Mr.Jaynes stated he will be able to provide eleven parking spaces on the site which meets the ordinance standard of 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit. Mr.Charles Menard supported Mr.Jaynes'roposal and stated that it would improve the neighborhood. Commissioner Walker suggested rezoning the lots to R-5. Mr.Jaynes did not object to the commissioner's proposal as long as he could proceed with his plans.Commissioner Nicholson did not agree with Commissioner Walker's idea. The R-5 rezoning proposal was dropped. After a brief discussion,the Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of the C-1 rezoning as filed.The motion passed by a vote of 7 ayes,0 noes,1 abstention,2 absent and 1 open position. 3 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:2 Z-5490 Owner:Margaret D.King Applicant:Ron Tabor Location:I-30 and Baseline Road Request:Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Purpose:Commercial Size:6.12 acres Existing Use:Mobile Home Park,Motel and Restaurant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Multifamily and Single-Family,zoned R-2 South —I-30 Right-of-Way,zoned R-2 East —Commercial,zoned C-4 West —Single-Family and Office,zoned C-3 STAFF ANALYSIS The property in question is located just west of the Baseline intersection with I-30,and it is situated between Baseline Road and the Frontage Road.The site encompasses a total of 6.12 acres.At this time,there is a mobile home park on the back portion and a motel with a detached eating place adjacent to I-30. In the immediate vicinity of the interchange,the zoning is either C-3 or C-4.To the north of Baseline Road,the current zoning is R-2.Land use in the area is made up of single family,multifamily,office,commercial,industrial and the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department complex.There are also several undeveloped tracts, including a sizeable C-3 parcel southeast of the interchange. In August of this year,the City rezoned 16 acres to C-3 directly west of the site under consideration.It is thestaff's understanding that the six acres will be combined with the C-3 parcel to the west for a single development. This is assuming that the C-3 request will be granted by the City. The location of the rezoning is addressed in the Otter Creek District Plan,however,a recent reconfiguration of several 1 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:2 2-5490 Cont. planning districts now places the site in Geyer Springs West.The land use element of Otter Creek Plan shows the southernportionas"mixed commercial/industrial"and the areaadjacenttoBaselineRoadforsinglefamilyuse.This is thesamepatternthatplanshowsforthe16acrestothewest. By approving the C-3 to the west and shifting the commerciallinetoBaselineRoad,the City has determined the areabetweenBaselineandthefrontageroadisappropriateforcommercialdevelopment.Adding 6 acres of C-3 should notcreateanyproblemsfortheareaorimpacttheresidentialneighborhoodtothenorthbecauseofadequateseparationbetweenthetwolanduses.It appears that othernonresidentialrezoningsintheimmediateareahave not had asignificanteffectonexistinguses. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Baseline Road is classified as a principal arterial and theMasterStreetPlanstandardis55feetfromthecenterline.Dedication of additional 25 feet will be necessary to satisfytheMasterStreetPlanrequirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the C-3 rezoning as requested. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) The applicant was present.There were no objectors inattendance,and the request was placed on the Consent Agenda. A motion was made to recommend approval of C-3 as filed.Themotionwasapprovedbyavoteof8ayes,0 nays,2 absent and1openposition. 2 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:3 Z-5496 Owner:Eugene and Norma Jean Lockwood Applicant:David J.Jones Location:7214 Cantrell Road Request:Rezone from C-3 and R-6 to C-4 Purpose:Retail with Outside Display Size:1.05 acres Existing Use:Retail and Office SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Vacant,zoned OS South —Commercial,zoned C-3 East —Vacant and Multifamily,zoned R-5 West —Commercial,zoned C-4 STAFF ANALYSIS The request before the Commission is to rezone one acre at 7214 Cantrell Road from R-6 and C-3 to C-4 for a retail use with outside display.There are a total of seven plattedlotsthatmakeupthesite.The R-6 area,four lots,is undeveloped and heavily wooded.On the front three lots, there is a two-story commercial building and paved areas for parking.This site has frontage on three streets,Florida Avenue,Kentucky Avenue and Cantrell Road (Highway 10);both Florida and Kentucky terminate within several feet of Cantrell Road. Zoning along this segment of Cantrell Road is primarily C-3 and C-4.Other zoning found in the surrounding area is R-2, R-4,R-5,R-6,MF-24,0-3,PRD and OS.The existing land useissimilartothezoningandconsistsofmultifamily,office, commercial and a fire station.The commercial uses includeretailestablishments,eating places,service stations, convenience stores with gas pumps and a large food store. The land use pattern found along Cantrell Road is typical of any major commercial arterial. After careful review of the request to reclassify the location to C-4,staff cannot support the proposed rezoning change.Primary reasons for this position are: 1 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:3 Z-5496 Cont. 1.The West Little Rock plan only identifies some of the Cantrell frontage for commercial use;the remaining land area is shown as multifamily. 2.The site has poor access for a C-4 location because they are usually "categorized by a high level of vehicular ingress and egress".The property is below the grade of Cantrell and getting out of thesitecanbedifficultattimes. 3.Due to some site constraints and the existing development,the property does not appear to work well as a C-4 location. 4.The zoning ordinance prohibits open display in thefirst20feetoftherequiredfrontyardsetback, which could impact the site's ability to provide adequate parking.(A variance from this provision can be requested through the Board of Adjustment.) Staff realizes there are other C-4 sites in the immediate vicinity and C-4 is intended for heavily traveled,major arterials.Due to the four pointslistedandotherfactors,it is our position that 7214 Cantrell does not lend itself to being a workable C-4 location.Also,it can be questioned as to whether a portion of the site should have ever been reclassifiedforcommercialusebecauseofsomeoftheconcerns raised in the preceding statements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Cantrell Road (Highway 10)is classified as a principalarterialontheMasterStreetPlan.The right-of-way standard for a principal arterial is 55 feet from thecenterline.This will require a dedication of an additional 24 feet on the Cantrell frontage of this tract.Engineeringisrecommendingthatthisrezoningdedicatesufficient right-of-way to provide a total of 40 feet from the centerline.A dedication of 55 feet would place the right- of-way within several feet of the existing building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial for the request of C-4 rezoning. 2 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:3 Z-5496 Cont. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) The applicant was present.Staff reported that the applicant submitted a letter amending the request to rezone the south 50 feet of the R-6 lots to C-3.There were no objectors,andtheitemwasplacedontheConsentAgendaasamended.A motion was made to recommend approval of C-3 as amended.The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays,2 absent and 1 open position. 3 November 5,1991 ITEN NO.:4 Z-5497 Owner:David and Sharon Edwards Applicant:David Edwards Location:6020 Young Road Request:Rezone from R-2 to I-2 Purpose:Office and Warehouse Size:0.69 acres Existing Use:Office SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Commercial,zoned C-3 South —Commercial,zoned C-4 East —Commercial,zoned C-4 and I-2 West —Single-Family,zoned I-2 STAFF ANALYSIS The property at 6020 Young Road is currently zoned R-2.The request is to reclassify it to I-2 for an office use and future warehousing.There is an one-story framed residential structure on the site.The lot has a frontage of 100 feet on Young Road and a depth of 300 feet.In the back of the property,there is part of a large AP&L easement that crosses the rear 90 feet. Zoning found in the area includes R-2,R-5,0-3,C-3,C-4,I-2 and PCD.6020 Young Road abuts I-2 on the west and a portion of the east property line;there is also some C-4 zoning to the east.C-3 property is situated to the north and across Young Road,the zoning is C-4.Land use in the area is similar to existing zoning and ranges from single family to industrial warehousing.Along Geyer Springs Road, a commercial strip,one can find the full scope of commercial activities/services,including eating places,convenience stores with gas pumps,and a post office. The Geyer Springs West Plan shows the site as part of a large industrial area located north of I-30 and west of Geyer Springs Road.Therefore,the request of I-2 reclassificationisconsistentwiththeadoptedplanandtherearenolanduse issues. 1 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:4 Z-5497 Cont ENGINEERING COMMENTS Young Road is classified as a collector and the right-of-way standard is 30 feet from the centerline.It appears that some dedication will be needed to conform to the MasterStreetPlanrequirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the I-2 rezoning and request asfiled. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) The applicant was in attendance.There were no objectors, and the item was placed on the Consent Agenda.A motion was made to recommend approval of I-2 as requested.The motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays,2 absent and 1 openposition.(The applicant was instructed to provide staff thelistofpropertyownerspriortotherezoningbeingforwarded to the Board of Directors.) 2 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:5 Z-5499 Owner:Jonas Corporation Applicant:William B.Putnam Location:Main Street and Mabelvale Pike Request:Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Purpose:Commercial Size:5.51 acres Existing Use:Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Vacant,zoned R-2 South —Vacant Single-Family,zoned R-2 East —Single-Family and Multifamily,zoned R-2 West —Vacant,zoned R-2 STAFF ANALYSIS The site under consideration is situated at the intersection of Mabelvale Pike/West (the new alignment)and Main Street in Mabelvale.The property is currently zoned R-2,and the request is to rezone the 5.5 acres to C-3 for an unspecified commercial development.A portion of the acreage has been cleared with the remaining land area wooded. Zoning in the area is primarily R-2.Within the block or two of the property,there are several tracts zoned C-3,C-4,andI-2.Across the railroad tracks,the existing zoning also includes some C-3 and I-2.The site abuts R-2 on the allsides.Land use is a mixture of single family,multifamily, commercial,industrial,and a police substation.Some of the uses are still nonconforming and there a number of undeveloped tracts found throughout the general vicinity. The Otter Creek District plan does not show the 5.5 acres for commercial use.(Because of district boundary changes,thesiteisnowpartofGeyerSpringsWest.)The plan reinforces the existing zoning and identifies the property for mixed residential use.The recommended "neighborhood commercial" area on the plan is a group of lots adjacent to the old alignment of Mabelvale Pike (now called Train Station Drive and Helms Drive).Six of the lots are zoned C-3 with a small commercial center on them.Also,there is a nonconforming 1 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:5 Z-5499 Cont. use at the corner of Main Street and Helms Drive.The plan does not recognize the C-3 zoning across the railroad tracks, nor does it include the C-4 lot as part of the defined commercial area.Between the neighborhood commercial and the mixed residential,the plan shows a single family area. The fundamental issue that this request raises is whether the new street alignment justifies violating the plan and creating a new commercial location.Staff's position is that the new roadway is not a valid justification for changing the direction of the plan and reorienting the commercial area. The plan's concept for this part of the Mabelvale community should be maintained by not endorsing the proposed C-3 reclassification.If the request is granted,it appears thatitwouldbedifficulttodenyothercommercialzoningsinthe immediate vicinity and,thus,creating the framework for an unmanageable zoning pattern.This,in turn,could have an adverse impact on the nearby residential uses.The existing commercial appears to be working and approving C-3 for the 5.5 acres could harm a viable neighborhood center. ENGINEERING COMMENTS The existing right-of-way for Mabelvale Pike is deficient and dedication of additional right-of-way will be required. Fifteen feet is needed because the right-of-way standard is 45 feet from the centerline. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the C-3 rezoning request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) The applicant and the owner were present.There were no objectors present.Jim Lawson,Planning Director, recommended the first 300 feet of the property from Mabelvale Pike be zoned C-2 and the balance of the site be zoned Open Space.The "OS"strip would connect to an existing park. Mr.Lawson also indicated that the "OS"strip would be the buffer for the single family subdivision lying directly to the north. The applicant,Bill Putnam,asked the Commission if he could represent his client.Chairman Perkins and the other commissioners objected to his presentation because of Mr.Putnam being present at the Planning Commission hearing. 2 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:5 Z-5499 Cont. Mr.Putnam then asked the owner,David Jones,to present the case.Mr.Jones spoke briefly and agreed with the staff recommendation as stated by Jim Lawson. A motion was made to approve the rezoning application as amended.The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,1 nay, 1 abstention,2 absent and 1 open position. 3 November 5,1991 PLANS HEARING ITEM NO.:6 TITLE:Amendments to the Rock Creek,Crystal Valley and Ellis Mountain Planning District. LOCATION:Various in an area West of the city limits to the planning boundary north of the county line to Kanis and Denny Road. REQUEST:To modify the adopted Land Use Plans based on changes made in a public meeting forextraterritorialzoning. STAFF REPORT: The City started with the Land Use Plan developed by consultants in 1986.Planning Staff reviewed the area to develop an existing land use map.Existing infrastructure such as water and roads were identified while possible future alignments were identified.From this information, the adopted plan was slightly modified to recognize some existing conditions which could be justified with the land use principals used by the City. A revised map was taken to a number of public meetings to receive public comment.Based on those comments,staff again reviewed the existing conditions and made several revisions to the plan map.The revised map was again taken to public meetings for comment.Additional facts were presented to staff,where citizens felt some other use should be shown on the plan. Staff once again reviewed the areas in question to determine the existing conditions.Further revisions were discussed and some changes were made to the plan map.This third revision for the land use map will be used to amend the adopted plans and as a guide for zoning the area for nonresidential uses. Proposed changes to Rock Creek Valley plan are as follows: (1)Add General Commercial at Kanis and the proposed Outer Loop.This will be a major intersection and currently three businesses are in operation.(2)Reduce the Commercial at Kanis and Stewart just at the intersection with some Neighborhood Commercial at Denny and Kanis.The existing church at Kanis and Stewart would be changed to Public Quasi-Public.(3)The Open Space (OS)along Rock Creek just west of Kanis should be pulled back to the floodway 1 November 5,1991 PLANS HEARING ITEM NO.:6 Cont. line.The Office/Warehouse use area and low density multifamily (LMF)area would be changed accordingly. (4)The Public Quasi-Public use on Pride Valley Road west of Baker Elementary would be changed to Single Family,as would the LMF area north to the creek.(5)In the southern portion of the district,the two churches on Colonel Glenn Road between Marsh and Burlington should be changed to Public Quasi-Public.(6)Finally,the intersection of Colonel Glenn and Marsh should be shown as a community commercial area.There are several commercial uses at this arterial intersection. Proposed changes in the Ellis Mountain and Crystal Valley Plan are as follows:(1)Add low density multi-family along Marsh south of the commercial area shown on the Rock Creek Plan.(2)An area of community commercial is added at the future intersection of the Outer Loop and Colonel Glenn where one business exist.(3)An "Existing Commercial Node"is proposed for Rocky Lane and Colonel Glenn where there are several existing businesses.(4)At Colonel Glenn,Lawson and David 0 Dodd intersections show some office as a transition from commercial to single family.(5)Change the Parks/Open Space to Public Institutional along Cooper Orbit Road,this is Lake Nixon. (6)The Light Industrial use area at Hugh Taylor and Lawson Roads would be enlarged to the east and south (to the church)with the area just west of Hugh Taylor Road and north of Lawson for industrial use.(7)The area to the west of the proposed west loop and south of the industrial,office or multifamily use is proposed. (8)The Neighborhood Commercial at the southwest corner of Lawson and Crystal Valley should be changed to "PI"as should the northwest corner where the church owns all three corners.(9)On either end of Sullivan Road,specifically Raines and Lawson,show small areas of neighborhood commercial use.Much of this is existing and the commercial nodes would be at major intersections. (10)At the Crystal Valley,Raines and Crystal Valley Lateral intersection remove the public institutional and multifamily uses.There is no desire for this use pattern in the area,and no water or sewer is available to allow it to happen.(11)The southeast corner should be changed to community shopping and square off the northern boundary with an existing private road.(12)North of Raines along Crystal Valley several businesses are,in existence,staff proposes an "Existing Commercial Node"for this location. (13)At the Crystal Valley and Colonel Carl Miller intersection an Office Node is suggested to recognize an existing business at a major intersection.(14)Remove Neighborhood Commercial in the southeast corner of Crystal 2 November 5,1991 PLANS HEARING ITEM NO.:6 Cont. Valley Road and Crystal Valley extension.(15)PublicInstitutionalshouldbeaddedatWhippoorwillandCrystal Valley,Crystal Valley between Whippoorwill and Raines,'olonelCarlMillernorthofBaselineandRaines,and west of Crystal Valley for existing churches. (16)On the north side of Haw Branch Creek west of Crystal Valley Cove add a Public Institutional area for a library and school which were originally at Raines and Crystal Valley.(17)The final change is from Park/Open Space and Single Family in the southeast corner of the district to Agriculture,which is an existing agricultural area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) Walter Malone,Planning Staff,explained that the purpose of the land use amendments was to make the adopted plan looklikethelanduseplandevelopedthroughtheneighborhood meetings.Mr.Malone reviewed each change both on the map and sketches distributed to the Commissioners.There being no questions,the chairman recognized those wishing to speaktotheCommissiononItemNo.6. Virginia Jones of 13805 Crystal Valley stated she had problems with 6H (land use plan)and 7L (zoning recommendation)for her property.For several decades her family has operated a sheet metal company on their acreage. They do not wish to expand the use,but do wish to protect the use and their investment by getting commercial zoning. Edward Babbin,who owns property at the end of Henderson Road,asked about his property and the ability to subdivide the land with agricultural zoning.He wishes to have several single family homes in the future.Mr.Lawson indicated that through the subdivision process the land could be split and more than one house built. John Crockett,owner of 20 acres on Carl Miller Road (westside),indicated he had had a salvage yard in that locationfor20years.Mr.Crockett does keep the property fenced. He wishes to be able to expand and keep his use open,if itiszonedR-2 this could be a problem.Mr.Crockett was informed he could expand the use to his current ownership even if zoned R-2. 3 November 5,1991 PLANS HEARING ITEM NO.:6 Cont. Ron Newman,Planning Manager,suggested that the Commissiongoaheadandapprovetheplanamendmentthenaddresstheseindividualzoningquestions.If the Commission wishes toapproveachangethroughzoningthenthosechangescanbeaddedlaterbeforegoingtotheCityBoardofDirectors. Mr.Jim Lawson,Director,stated Staff wanted to have theplaninplaceasabasisforthezoningfirst. Commissioner Walker asked if the changes proposed wouldbringtheexistingplanclosertorequestsfrompropertyowners.Staff answered in the affirmative.CommissionerWalkermadeamotiontoacceptthestaffrecommendationforthisitem.By an unanimous vote of 8 ayes,0 nays and2absenttheitemwasapproved. STAFF UPDATE:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) As a result of items requested for rezoning an amendment wasmadetomakeallthepropertyownedbyRonHopperandDougWillifordOffice/Warehouse on the land use plan —approvedbyavoteof6ayes,2 nays (Oleson and Walker)and 2 absent.(Before the vote the property north of the creekwasshownforOffice/Warehouse and south of the creek waslowdensityMultifamily. 4 November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7 Area 2 Rezoning GENERAL INFORMATION: In preparing the recommendations for plan amendments andrezonings,the Staff used the following general rules andassumptions: 1.Land Use Plan:All Staff recommendations arebasedonwhetherornottherequestisconsistentwiththelanduseplan,including the amendmentsproposedbytheStaffinItem6oftheagenda. 2.Existin Commercial Node:Where applicable,the Existing Commercial Node concept was used inArea2.This concept is used to recognize aconcentrationofcommercialdevelopmentthatexistsatthetimeitiszonedbytheCity,in anareawherearterialstreetsdonotintersect. An Existing Commercial Node must have thefollowingcharacteristics: a.The property is not located at theintersectionoftwoarterialstreets. b.A concentration of long-term establishedbusinessesmustexist. c.Businesses must be located on both sidesoftheroad. d.Businesses must be contiguous or incloseproximity. e.Recommended zoning would be Planned Commercial Development.Site plan isrequired. 3.A riculture Forestr AF Zonin :The AFagricultureandforestryzoningdistrict isintendedtoprovideasmoothtransitionbetweenpurelyruralareasandnewlyurbanizedareas.This zoning category has been requested by severalpropertyownersinArea2,and is being recommended by the Staff in each instance. Examples of allowed uses in the AF district are a.Single family residences. b.Agricultural and forestry operations,including raising of livestock andpoultry. c.Governmental or private recreation uses,including day camps and passive openspace. 4.Non-conformin Us s:Any use,structure or lotwhichlegally existed prior to the effective dateofextraterritorialzoninginArea2,or which hasbeenrenderednonconformingbytheprovisionsoftheZoningOrdinance,may continue to be utilizedinthesamefashionasexistedpriortotheadoptionoftheordinance.The followingregulationsshallapplytonon-conforming uses:~Eo:A o -o Eo 'E llnotbeextended,expanded,enlarged,orincreasedinintensitytoanyotherstructureorlandareaotherthanthatoccupiedbysuchnon-conforming use ontheeffectivedateofextraterritorial zoning in Area 2.All uses permitted byConditionalUsePermitintheR-2districtshallberecognizedas conforming uses as if a C.U.P.had previously been authorized. b.Ch e in Use:If no structuralalterationsaremade,a nonconforminguseofabuildingmaybechangedtoanothernonconforminguseifthesame or more restrictive classification.In nocaseshallsuchuseberevertedbackto a more intensive nonconforming use. c.Abandonment or Disconti uance:When a nonconforming use has been discontinuedorabandonedandtheappearanceofthe property does not depict the identity oftheongoinguse,and if the apparent abandonment exists for one (1)year,the nonconforming status is lost and any subsequent use of the property must comply with the zoning ordinance. d.Da a e or Destruction:In the eventthatanystructureisdevotedinwholeorinparttoanonconforminguse,andisdestroyedbyfire,explosion or othercasualty,or the public enemy,to theextentofmorethanfifty(50)percentofthecurrentreplacementvalue immediately prior to such damage,suchstructureshallnotberestoredunless such structure and use thereof shall thereafter conform to all regulations ofthezoningdistrictinwhichsuchstructureandusearelocated. e.Pre-e ulation Mobile omes and an factured Homes:An individual mobile home or manufactured homelawfullyplacedonalotpriortoadoptionofArea2zoning,shall becomeanonconforminguseandshallnotbereplacedbyanothermobilehome,unlessthenonconformingzoningdistrictisamobilehomepark. f.Mobile Home Park Zonin :A legallyexistingmobilehomeparkthatisrenderednon-conforming by Area 2zoning,may continue to exist with the same number of mobile homes.New mobile homes may be replaced as necessary butthetotalnumbermaynotincrease without zoning action. 5.Gra e Period for Area 2 Rezonin :Staff suggeststhatasix(6)month grace period be granted tothosepropertyownersinArea2whowishtohavetheirpropertyrezonedbutarenotincludedinthecurrentrezoningpackage.This grace period wouldallowforfilinganapplicationwithoutafilingfeebeingassessed.This action would need BoardofDirectorsapproval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: There was a discussion on item 7.Commissioner Olsensuggestedthatafilingfeeforothersin the area be waivedforaperiodofsixmonthswithpropernotificationandthatifapersonisdeniedarequesttoday,be able to comebackandrefilewiththefeebeingwaived,for the particularzoningrequested.Commissioner Walker explained the variousexpensesinvolvedinfilingforazoningrequestandtheexpensesthatwouldbewaivedinasixmonthgraceperiodforpersonsinArea2. Commissioner Olsen moved to waive the filing fee for sixmonthsandallowothersinArea2theopportunitytorefileifdeniedtoday.The motion was seconded.Motion passedunanimously.8 ayes,0 no November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7A Z 5502 ARBRCRDRERF GRH OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:Kanis Road from Stewart RoadeasttoKirkRoad. R~EUEEU:Z-5502-A Rezone from R-2 to C-1 Z-5502-B Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5503-C Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5502-D Rezone from R-2 to AFZ-5502-E Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5502-F Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5502-G Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5502-H Rezone from R-2 to C-3 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2. PARCEL SIZE:Z-5502-A 2.89 acres Z-5502-B 2.89 acres Z-5502-C 2.82 acres Z-5502-D 107 acresZ-5502-E 2.89 acres Z-5502-F 1.11 acres Z-5502-G 5.78 acres Z-5502-H 2.89 acres ANALYSIS: The C-3 rezoning requests are to recognize existingcommercialusesalongKanis.Of the six C-3 requests,fourareinareasshownascommercialonthelanduseplan. Those four are: Z-5502-B Denny and Kanis RoadZ-5502-E North of Kanis between Chenal and Denny RoadZ-5502-F Kanis and Edswood-intersection of Outer LoopZ-5502-H Kanis and Chenal Parkway Two requests for C-3 zoning are shown on the land use planassinglefamilyresidential.Those are Z-5502-C on thesouthsideofKanisbetweenDennyandEdswoodandZ-5502-G on the south side of Kanis between Edswood and Chenal Parkway. The C-1 request (Z-5502-A)is to recognize and existing useatDennyandKanis,north of Denny Road.This use is also shown as commercial on the land use plan. ITEM NO.'Z-5502-A B C D E F G H continue The AF rezoning (Z-5502-D)is at the request of a propertyowner,who uses the land for agriculture and forestry.ItisthepositionoftheStaffthatanypropertyownerusingpropertyforagricultureand/or forestry in Area 2,begrantedAFzoningifrequested. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the following requests,whicharecompatiblewiththelanduseplan Z-5502-A C-1 Z-5502-B C-3 Z-5502-D AF Z-5502-E C-3 Z-5502-F C-3 Z-5502-H C-3 Staff recommends denial of the following requests which are shown as R-2 on the land use plan: Z-5502-C Z-5502-G PLANNING COMMISSION CTION:(November 5,1991) Ron Newman explained item 7A-Z-5502-A,B,C,D,E,F,G &H. Commissioner Olsen moved to accept staff recommendation foritem7A.The motion was seconded.Commissioner WalkerquestionedanoverlayconceptastozoningonDennyRd.. Chairman Perkins asked about an appeal process.He wantedtoknowifapplicantscouldappealtotheBoardofDirectors.Jim Lawson stated that if denied the applicantsareabletoappealtotheBoardofDirectors.Question wascalled.The motion was restated.Motion passed,7 ayes,1abstention. November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7B Z-5503-A,B,C OWNER:Various A~PZCANT:Staff LOCATION:Kanis Road from Chenal ParkwaysoutheasttoCooperOrbitRoad RZIZUEST:Z-5503-A Rezone from R-2 to C-3Z-5503-B Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5503-C Rezone from R-2 to C-1 &MF-6 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2. SIZE:Z-5503-A 2.77 acresZ-5503-B 8.026 acresZ-5503-C 10.34 acres ANALYSIS: Much of the area south of Kanis Road,near the Kanis/ChenalParkwayintersectionisintheRockCreekfloodway.Requests Z-5503-A and B are near the floodway and are shownasOffice/Warehouse on the land use plan.The propertiesareheingusedassinglefamilyresidentialandabikeshop,respectively. Request Z-5503-C is at the corner of Kanis and Cooper OrbitRoad.This intersection is shown as commercial on the landuseplan,with Multi-family immediately to the west.Thepropertyisheingusedasafleamarketnearesttheintersectionandamobilehomeparktothewest. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Z-5503-A and Z-5503-B be rezoned to0-3,north of the creek only,and that Z-5503-C be rezonedtoC-1 nearest to the intersection and to MF-6 for thatportionofthetractwestoftheintersection. P NING COMMISSION ACTION:(November 5,1991) Ron Newman gave a explanation of cases and the staff report.After further discussion David Perryman spoke of his plansforaconveniencestoreandacarwash.Mr.PerrymanrequestedC3zoningandstaffrecommendedCl.Jim LawsonstatedthatacarwashispermittedinClbyaconditionalusepermit.Commissioner McDaniel explained to Mr Perryman Item No.:7B Z-5503 A B cont's that the commission can't give him carte blanche that heneeds.Mr.Lawson suggested that Mr.Perryman comeback withaplanandfileforaPCD. Bob Wilson of Elgor Inc.questioned why the city was notbeingconsistent.He stated that his company had requestedzoninginthesameareaandthecitydeniedhisrequest.Ron Hopper questioned if the city had already zoned the areapasthisproperty(corner of Kanis &Chenal Parkway)andalsoexplainedwhyhehadrequestedhispropertytobezoned.Commissioner Olsen asked that staff comment on thePCDacrossfromMr.Hoppers property.Mr.Lawson explainedthePCDofMechanicsLumberandstatedthattheouterparcelsarezonedC3.Commissioner Walker gave anexplanationofasiteplananditsuseandstated that Mr.Hopper doesn't have a specifioc use or site plan for hisproperty.Mr.Lawson suggested that the commission move onthetootherissues.Mr.Hopper explained how to develophisproperty,so it can be sold. Doug Williford stated why he wanted his property zoned.HeisrequestingC3becausehewouldliketobeabletobuildsomethingotherthanallowedinR2.Mr.Williford wouldlikeforhiswholeparceltobezonedC3but03issatisfactory.Commissioner McDaniel stated that Mr.HopperandMr.Williford argue a good point.The whole propertyshouldbezonednotjustthefronthalf.Mr.LawsonexplainedthattypicallyfloodwayiszonedOSinazoningrequest.Commissioner Olsen questioned the C1 &MF6 requestatKanisandCooperOrbitRds.Bob Wilson stated that whenhehadaskedforClacrossthestreethispropertyislocatedinthecityandwasonlyabletoget03.Afterfurtherdiscussion,Mr.Williford and Mr.Hopper asked thattheirparticularzoningrequestbedropped.They arewithdrawingtheirrequestforzoningbutrequestthat thelanduseplanreflectzoningontheirwholepiecesofproperty.Mr.Lawson stated that the Land Use Plans shouldbeamendedtoincludetheWillifordandHopperpropertiesas0/W on the entire property and identify the floodway.There was a motion to withdraw Z-5503-A &B and that Z-5503C.be approved as recommended by the Staff.The motionpassed7ayes,1 no. Commissioner Olsen asked if the commission should amend thelanduseplan.Commissioner Putnam made a motion to amendtheLandUsePlanfor0/W to expand on all of Hopper andWillifordproperties.Motion passed 6 ayes,2 no November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7C Z 5504 AP BP CP D OWNER:ELGOR Properties APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:West of Bowman &South of Kanis Roads. ~RE PEEP:Z-5504-A Rezone from R-2 to 0-2 Z-5504-B Rezone from R-2 to MF-18 Z-5504-C Rezone from R-2 to MF-12 Z-5504-D Rezone from R-2 to MF-12 ~PURPUE To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE:Z-5504-A —8.035 acres Z-5504-B —27.051 acresZ-5504-C —7.317 acres Z-5504-D —8.000 acres ANALYSIS: The property represented as Z-5504,tracts A,B,C and D are a part of the ELGOR Properties Land Use Development Plan. The request is for tract A to be rezoned to 0-2;tract B toMF-18,and tracts C and D to MF-12.Each of the requestsarecompatiblewiththelanduseplan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the following requests: Z-5504-A to 0-2 Z-5504-B to MF-18 Z-5504-C to MF-12 Z-5504-D to MF-12 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(November 5,1991) Item No.7C Z-5504 A,B,C &D all represent Elgor Properties. Motion was made to approve as per staff recommendation. Motion passed unanimously.8 ayes,0 no November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7D Z 5505 A~BgCgDgE F~G OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:Col.Glenn Road from Greenbear Road to east to Alpine Lane REVEST:Z-5505-A Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5505-B Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5505-C Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5505-D Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5505-E Rezone from R-2 to R-7 Z-5505-F Rezone from R-2 to MF-6 Z-5505-G Rezone from R-2 to C-1 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2. SIZE:Z-5505-A 2.75 acres Z-5505-B 2.75 acres Z-5505-C 4.97 acres Z-5505-D 0.7 acres Z-5505-E 8.672 acres Z-5505-F 2.80 acres Z-5505-G 3.68 acres ANALYSIS: The request for C-3 at Colonel Glenn and Marsh Road(Z-5505-A)and the request for C-1 at Colonel Glenn andBurlingame(Z-5505-G)are in areas shown as commercial onthelanduseplan.These requests are to recognize existingcommercialuses. The intersection of Colonel Glenn and Rocky Lane has beenidentifiedbytheStaffasanExistingCommercialNode(seecoversheetfordefinition).The request (Z-5505-D)is forC-4 zoning to recognize an existing commercial use at thefront200feetoftheproperty. The request for C-3 at Kanis and Winsome Drive (Z-5505-C) and for C-4 south of Kanis on Jack Mann Road (Z-5505-B)are shown as single family on the land use plan. The request for R-7 on Rocky Lane (Z-5505-E)is to allow amobilehomepark,but is shown as single family on the plan.The request for MF-6 south of Colonel Glenn on Marsh Road ITEM NO.:7D Z-5505-A B C D E continues (Z-5505-F)is to recognize a row of rent houses on a singletract.The tract is shown as Multi-family on the plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as proposed for the followingrequestswhicharecompatiblewiththelanduseplan: Z-5505-A rezone to C-3 Z-5505-F rezone to MF-6 Z-5505-G rezone to C-1 Staff recommends approval of the following request asmodified: Z-5505-D rezone to PCD,front 200 feet only (Existing Commercial Node) Staff recommends denial of the following requests which are shown as R-2 on the land use plan: Z-5505-B Z-5505-C Z-5505-E PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIO (November 5,1991) Item 7D Z-5505 A,B,C,D,E,F &G Mr.Newman explained thecases.Commissioner Olsen moved to accept zoning as recommended by Staff and amended item D as a PCD.Motion was seconded.Motion passed 7 ayes,1 abstention November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7E Z-5506 OWNER:Brian Young APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:SW corner of Pritchard Mill &Col.Glenn Roads ~RE VEST:Rezone from R-2 to C-3 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 ~SI Z Z-5506 4.49 acres ANALYSIS: The property at Colonel Glenn and Pritchard Mill Road is atthepointwheretheproposedOuterLoopintersectsColonel Glenn and is shown as commercial on the land use plan.Therequestatthislocation(Z-5506)is for C-3 zoning at thefront700feetonly. STAFF RECO ENDATION: Staff recommends that Z-5506 be approved as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(November 5,1991) Item 7E Z-5506,Commissioner Nicholson moved to acceptzoningasrecommendedbyStaff.Motion passed,7ayes,1abstention November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7F Z-5507 OWNER:Carlos A.Araoz APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:On Cooper Orbit Road,east of Cooper Orbit,between Kanis &VistaDrive ~RE U QT:Rezone from R-2 to PRD PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE:Z-5507 80 acres ANALYSIS: The request for Z-5507,is for PRD zoning to allow thepropertytobeusedasaresidentialcarefacility.Theapplicantproposesdetacheddwellingunitsforseniorcitizens.The tract is shown as single family on the landuseplan.No site plan has been submitted. STAFF RECOMME ATION: Staff recommends denial of the PRD request for lack of asiteplan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(November 5,1991) Following discussion,Commissioner McDaniel called forquestion.There was a motion made to accept zoning asrecommendedbystaff.Motion passed unanimously 8 ayes 0 no November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7G Z-5508 OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:Along Cooper Orbit Road in the Lake Nixon area ~RE VEST:Rezone from R-2 to AF PURPOSE:For Church related recreational uses and open space SIZE:40 acres ANALYSIS: The request for AF zoning is to allow a tract of landsurroundingLakeNixontobeusedforchurchrelatedrecreationalusesandopenspace.AF zoning will allow thepropertytobeusedasproposed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that tract Z-5508 be rezoned to AF asfiled. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(November 5, 1991) There was short discussion of Z-5508.CommissionerNicholsonmovedtoacceptzoningasrecommendedby staff.Motion passed unanimously 8 eyes,0 no November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7H Z-5509-A,B OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:Z-5509-A:SW corner of Lawson &David O.Dodd RoadsZ-5509-B:Fronting on Lawson &Col. Glenn Roads west of citylimits ~RE UEEE:Z-5509-A Rezone from R-2 to AFZ-5509-B Rezone from R-2 to C-3 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 ~SI Z Z-5509-A 84.7 acresz-5509-B 2.60 acres ANALYSIS: The request for AF zoning (Z-5509-A)along Lawson andColonelGlennconsistsofatractthatiscurrentlybeingusedforagriculturalandforestryuse. The request for C-3 zoning is at the corner of Lawson andDavidO.Dodd Roads.This tract is shown as Office on thelanduseplan. STAFF RECO ENDATION: Staff recommends that Z-5509-A be rezoned to AF. Staff recommends that Z-5509-B be rezoned to 0-2. PLAN ING COMMISSION ACTION'November 5,1991) Mr.Newman explaimed the cases.Gene Brewer spoke on behalfofZ-5509-B.He had requested C3 zoning.Mr.Brewer statedthathewouldlikeC3zoningbutissatisfiedwithstaff'srecommendation.Commissioner Nicholson motioned to accepzoningasrecommendedbystaff.Motion passed unanimously 8ayes0no November 5,1991 ~EE M MO.:77 Z 5510 APB D EPFPGPH I 7 JSKPLPM NPO OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:Various locations near theintersectionofLawson&CrystalValleyRoads ~EE UESE:Z-5510-A Rezone from R-2 to C-4 Z-5510-B Rezone from R-2 to C-1 Z-5510-D Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5510-E Rezone from R-2 to C-1Z-5510-F Rezone from R-2 to C-1 Z-5510-G Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5510-H Rezone from R-2 to R-7z-5510-I Rezone from R-2 to C-3Z-5510-J Rezone from R-2 to I-2 Z-5510-K Rezone from R-2 to I-2 Z-5510-L Rezone from R-2 to I-3 Z-5510-M Rezone from R-2 to I-1 Z-5510-N Rezone from R-2 to C-3Z-5510-0 Rezone from R-2 to I-3 ~PPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE:Z-5510-A 1.46 acres Z-5510-B 1.36 acres Z-5510-D .50 acresZ-5510-E 1.79 acresZ-5510-F 1.72 acres Z-5510-G 1.48 acres Z-5510-H 2.50 acresZ-5510-I 2.00 acresZ-5510-J 62.73 acres Z-5510-K 61.50 acres Z-5510-L 4.88 acres Z-5510-M 5.79 acres Z-5510-N 1.16 acresZ-5510-0 2.62 acres ITEM NO.:7I Z-5510-A,B,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O (continue) ANALYSIS: The following are requests for rezoning to uses that arecompatiblewiththelanduseplan: Z-5510-B Lawson and Sullivan Road,requesting C-1Z-5510-E Lawson and Sullivan Road,requesting C-1Z-5510-F Lawson and Sullivan Road,requesting C-1Z-5510-J Lawson Road,north of.Lawson,in the curve,requesting I-2 Z-5510-K (part)Lawson and Hugh Taylor Road,south andeastofLawson(in the curve),requesting I-2 Each of the above requests are to recognize existing non-residential uses along Lawson Road. The following requests are for uses not compatible with thelanduseplan: Z-5510-A Lawson Road and Plume Lane,requesting C-4Z-5510-D Lawson Road between Sullivan and Harkins,north of Lawson,requesting C-3Z-5510-G Lawson Road and Harkins Ave.,requesting C-3Z-5510-H Sullivan Road,south of Lawson Road, requesting R-7Z-5510-I Lawson Road between Mandam Ave.and CrystalValleyRoad,requesting C-3 Z-5510-K (part)Lawson and Hugh Taylor Road,west of Lawson (in the curve),requesting I-2Z-5510-L Lawson Road,north of Lawson,east of HughTaylorRoad,requesting I-3 Z-5510-M Lawson Road,south of Lawson,east of Hugh Tayor Road,requesting C-4 Z-5510-N Crystal Valley and Hammond Road, requesting C-3 Z-5510-0 Lawson Road,north of Lawson,east of HughTaylorRoad,requesting I-3 STAFF RECOMMENDAT ON: Staff recommends approval as proposed for the followingrequestswhicharecompatiblewiththelanduseplan: Z-5510-B rezone to C-1 Z-5510-E rezone to C-1 Z-5510-F rezone to C-1 Z-5510-J rezone to I-2 ITEM NO 'I Z-5510-B D E F H I J M N 0 contStaffrecommendsapprovalofthefollowingrequestsasmodified: Z-5510-K rezone west tract to 0-2,east tract to I-2Z-5510-L rezone to I-2 Z-5510-M rezone to I-1 Z-5510-0 rezone to M Staff recommends denial of the following requests which areshownasR-2 on the land use plan: Z-5510-A Z-5510-D Z-5510-G Z-5510-H Z-5510-I Z-5510-N PLANNING COMMISSION CTION'November 5,1991) Mr.Newman gave an explanation of cases and staffrecommendation.There was a motion to accept zoning as perstaffrecommendation.Motion passed unanimously 8 ayes,0no November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7J Z 5511 AgB C D(E(F OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:Various locations in the area ofCrystalValleyRoadbetweenLawson &Raines Roads. ~RE UES1':Z-5511-A Rezone from R-2 to C-4Z-5511-B Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5511-C Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5511-D Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5511-E Rezone from R-2 to C-3Z-5511-F Rezone from R-2 to C-3 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE:Z-5511-A ?acresZ-5511-B 2.66 acres Z-5511-C 5.42 acresZ-5511-D 9.35 acresZ-5511-E ?acresZ-5511-F ?acres ANALYSIS: The request to zone tract Z-5511-A to C-4 is to recognize anexistingC-4 use,between Sullivan Road and Shaner Circle. The property is shown as single family on the land use plan. Tracts Z-5511-B,C,and D are on Crystal Valley Road in anExistingCommercialNode,as defined by the Staff.EachrequestedC-3 zoning to recognize existing commercial uses. Tract Z-5511-E is a request for C-3 zoning at Crystal ValleyRoadandCrystalValleyLateral.The area is shown ascommercialonthelanduseplan. Tract Z-5511-F is a request for C-3 zoning at Raines RoadandMerryLane.The area is shown as single family on thelanduseplan. Item No.:7J Z-5511 A,B,C,D,E,F (continue) ST FF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends that Z-5511-E be rezoned C-3 as filed. Staff recommends that Z-5511-B,Z-5511-C,and Z-5511-D bedesignatedasPCD,as specified on the respective siteplans. Staff recommends that Z-5511-A and Z-5511-F be denied andremainR-2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (November 5,1991) Mr.Newman gave an explanation of cases and staffrecommendation.Commissioner Walker moved to accept zoningasperstaffrecommendation.Motion seconded and passed7ayes November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7K Z-5512-A,B,C,D OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:In the area of Raines &Henderson Roads REIEUEST:Z-5512-A Rezone from R-2 TO C-3 Z-5512-B Rezone from R-2 TO AFZ-5512-C Rezone from R-2 TO AFZ-5512-D Rezone from R-2 to AF PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE:Z-5512-A 29.73 acres Z-5512-B 25.00 acresZ-5512-C 40.00 acres Z-5512-D 40.00 acres ANALYSIS: The C-3 request (Z-5512-A)near Sullivan and Raines Road,istorecognizeanexistingbusinessandresidenceonthattract.The area is shown as commercial on the land useplan. The AF requests (Z-5512-B,C,&D)are three large tracts onornearHendersonRoadwhicharebeingusedasfarmland. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Z-5512 A be rezoned to C-1.Staff recommends that Z-5512 B,C &D be rezoned to AF asrequested. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION'November 5,1991) Sam Raines had a question about the Area 2 procedure.HisfamilyownsseveralhundredacresintheareaandhestatedthathewouldgetwithMr.Newman for an appropiate zoningofhisproperty.There was a motion to accept zoning as perstaffrecommendation.Motion passed 7ayes (CommissionerNicholsonhadtoleave) November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:7L Z-5513 OWNER:Various APPLICANT:Staff LOCATION:In the area of Crystal Valley & Col.Carl Miller Roads R~EUEPX:Z-5513 A Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5513 B Rezone from R-2 to C-4 Z-5513 C Rezone from R-2 to C-4 Z-5513 D Rezone from R-2 to C-4 PURPOSE:To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE:Z-5513 5.0 acres Z-5513 19.70 acres2-5513 ?acres Z-5513 10.0 acres ANALYSIS: The request at Crystal Valley and Col.Carl Miller Road(Z-5513-A)is to rezone the entire tract to C-3.The northone-half of that tract is commercial on the land use plan,and is being used as a office/residence.The south half isvacantland,primarily in the floodway. The C-4 requests along Col.Carl Miller Road (Z-5513-B&C)are to reflect existing commercial uses in an area shown assinglefamilyonthelanduseplan. The request for C-4 zoning at the point where Crystal Valleyturnsnorth(Z-5513-D),is to recognize an existingcommercial/residential use in an area shown as single family on the land use plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Z-5513-A be rezoned to 0-3 on thenorthhalfandremainR-2 on the south half. Staff recommends that Z-5513-B,Z-5513-C and Z-5515-D bedeniedandremainR-2. PLANNING COMM SION ACTION (November 5,1991) Item deferred until November 19,1991 meeting. November 5,1991 ITEM NO.:8 OTHER MATTE S Requested Action:Adoption of the 1992 Calendar of Meetings PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 5,1991) Staff presented the 1992 calendar of hearings.Several commissioners expresses some reservations about the rezoning hearing scheduled for December 29,1992.Staff was instructed to look into the possibility of changing the December 29th meeting date. After some additional comments,a motion was made to defertheadoptionofthecalendartotheNovember19,1991 hearing.The motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays,2 absent and 1 open position. 1 ITEN I40.8 PLANNING COMMISSION CALENDAR —1992 ADOPTED: REZONING HEARINGS: ~21 D t ~L*1 Ad ~Mo D t.(1)(2) 12-23-91 01-10-92 01-28-92 02-03-92 02-21-92 03-10-9203-16-92 04-03-92 04-21-9204-27-92 05-08-92 06-02-9206-08-92 06-19-92 07-14-9207-20-92 07-31-92 08-25-9208-31-92 09-11-92 10-06-9210-12-92 10-30-92 11-17-9211-23-92 12-11-92 12-29-9201-04-93 01-22-93 02-09-93 SUBDIVISION HEARINGS: Subdivision Planning~2)D t ~LA Ad Committee Commission 12-09-91 12-20-91 12-19-91 01-14-9201-20-92 01-30-92 02-06-92 02-25-9203-02-92 03-12-92 03-19-92 04-07-9204-13-92 04-23-92 04-30-92 05-19-92 05-26-92 06-06-92 06-11-92 06-30-9207-06-92 07-16-92 07-23-92 08-11-9208-17-92 08-27-92 09-03-92 09-22-9209-28-92 10-08-92 10-15-92 11-03-9211-03-92 11-13-92 11-26-92 12-15-9212-21-92 12-31-92 01-14-93 01-26-93 PLANNING HEARINGS: ~L)Ad M~t't (1)(2) 01-23-92 02-11-92 03-05-92 03-24-92 04-15-92 05-05-92 05-27-92 06-16-92 07-09-92 07-28-92 08-19-92 09-08-92 09-30-92 10-20-9211-11-92 12-01-92 12-23-92 01-12-93 NOTE:(1)All Public Hearings shall be held at 1:00 P.M. unless otherwise changed by the Commission. (2)The Commission holds an agenda meeting at 12:00 P.M. on the meeting date unless changed by the Chairman. (3)All meetings shall be held at 1:00 P.M.unless changed by the Subdivision Committee. NOTICE:AN INTERPRETER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED UPON REQUESTS.REQUESTS SHOULD BE MADE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS AND PLANNING AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING DATE. ~ggggggggggg ~ Rgggaaaa.~gaggagngg ERR ~Rgggggggga ~ agggaggagag g Ignnn : 1RRRRnglgll ~ggg Egal%Raga glglg IRRRRRRR gall Illa%Raga gall ~ERRRR gllgggl ERRRERRR ~agaanll gg ggnng -ggggggggg glg -Rgggggg ( ~0 (I 8 ( ( 0 ~~ II ( ~((1 1 ~~ (~1 W RRRRRRRRRRRRRHRLRRRRRRRRRRRRHRRSSRSRRRRLRRSORLWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRERRRRRLRRRRRRRRRWRRRRERSLRRWQWESSRRR~PSRSSEIIISESISRRRRRRRRRRRRRRQLRRRLSLSRLRSRRSRRESLSQREERSLQRRRRHRHRRHRRRRRR WWSRIRWRIWKISMlQRWRIWWSRWWRISRMLRM55MWMMW55Rl&RJ&5%%l&WhiKSLIKRKf KISS W&5855WSRW55WWWFH5555&SlWWSRSRR5555k55WWhl55WSIwmmmmmmmmmmmwwm .. —..:.-: mmm mmmmmmmmm w-...-..:mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmRRRRSRLRRRERSSR%%MRIMRCMRSMMMMMR%lRMWWWMSRW5555%555555555SIW RRhQKHRQRSRQQSRQ55RRHRliLIRQ ~I ~~~~e November 5,1991 There being no further business before the Commission,the meeting was adjourned at 4:55 p.m. Date