pc_11 17 1992LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
REZONING HEARING
MINUTE RECORD
NOVEMBER 17,1992
12:30 P.M.
I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being eight in number.
II.Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting
The minutes of the October 6,1992 meeting were approvedasmailed.
III.Members Present:John McDaniel
Diane Chachere
Jerilyn Nicholson
Kathleen OlesonBillPutnam
Jim VonTungeln
Brad Walker
Ronald Woods
Ramsay Ball (arrived after therollcall)
Emmett Willis,Jr.(arrived after
the roll call)
Members Absent:Joe Selz
City Attorney:Susan Oswalt
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
REZONING HEARING
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 17,1992
DEFERRED ITEMS:
A.Z-5567 Chenal Parkway and R-2,0-2 and
Kanis Road C-3 to C-4
ZONING ITEMS:
1.Z-5627 10,016 Chicot Road C-3 to C-4
2.Z-5628 South University Avenue C-3 to C-4
and Mabelvale Pike
3.Z-3271-A Fluid Drive C-3 to I-2
OTHER MATTERS:
4.TREADCO Conditional Use Permit 7510 Fluid Drive(Z-3271-B)
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:A Z-5567
Owner:J.W.Shackleford
Applicant:R.Wingfield Martin
Location:Chenal Parkway and Kanis Road
Request:Rezone from R-2,0-2 and
C-3 to C-4
Purpose:Commercial (with outside
display)and Bus Company
Size:20.98 acres
Existing Use:Various Uses
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North —Vacant,zoned MF-12
South —Vacant,zoned R-2
East —Vacant and Church,zoned 0-2 and PCD
West —Vacant and Single-Family,zoned R-2 and C-3
STAFF ANALYSIS
The issue before the Commission is rezoning 20 acres on
both sides of the Chenal Parkway from R-2,0-2 and C-3 toC-4.The acreage is situated between Kirk Road and Kanis
Road.Land on the south side of the parkway is outside thecityandwasreclassifiedtoR-2 through the Area II zoningaction.The existing 0-2 and C-3 areas on the north side
were rezoned as part of the Chenal zoning effort approved
in 1987.Uses found on the land include single family
residences,several barns,cabinet shop,a landscaping
business (with greenhouses),a bus company and outsidestorage.There are also two billboards and the majority of
the south side is undeveloped.It is anticipated that therewillbenoimmediatechangestotheusesiftherezoningis
granted.The primary reason for filing the request is to do
away with the nonconforming status.
Other zoning found in the area is MF-12,0-3 and PCD.The
property in question abuts R-2,MF-12,0-2 and C-3 lands.
In addition to the uses mentioned earlier,a church and a
construction company are also found in the area.A high
percentage of the surrounding land is vacant at this time.
The area under consideration is part of the Chenal District
Plan (Rock Creek Valley/Ellis Mountain in the past)and the
land use plan identifies the property for multiple uses.
For the north side,the plan recommends neighborhood,
1
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:A Z-5567 Cont.
commercial and office.Both C-3 and 0-2,the existing
zoning,are the appropriate districts for the adopted land
use pattern.On the south side,the plan shows the acreage
for mixed office and warehouse.
In the C-4 district,an office and office warehouse are
permitted by right;warehousing is a conditional use.
However,the plan's intent is not to endorse C-4 for the
office and warehouse area,but rather to recognize that
a type of development could be allowed under certain
circumstances and through a carefully reviewed plan.There
are a number of C-4 uses that are not compatible with the
parkway,and C-4 is not the direction the City wants the
Chenal Parkway to go.A C-4 reclassification does not
maintain the plan's land use concept and could have an
adverse impact on the parkway corridor.And finally,thereisnoC-4 along the entire Chenal Parkway,and the staff has
never supported a C-4 rezoning for the area.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
1.A portion of the Chenal Parkway does not have the
necessary right-of-way of 120 feet.Dedication of
additional right-of-way is needed to meet the standard.
(Any featured development will require improvement to
the parkway.)
2.Both Kanis and Kirk Roads need 5 feet of additional
right-of-way.
3.Dedication of right-of-way for a future collector
(60 feet total)shown on the Master Street Plan.The
proposed location of the collector is approximately
400 feet east of Kirk Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the C-4 rezoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(JUNE 2,1992)
The applicant,Wingfield Martin,was present.There were noobjectors.Mr.Martin said he was representing the
Shacklefords,who own a total of 375 acres.Mr.Martin then
proceeded to discuss the Improvement District and the Chenal
Parkway He told the Commission that the Shacklefords had
operated a dairy on the land for many years.He then gave
some history on the planning efforts in the area and for
the property.Mr.Martin then described the existing
2
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:A Z-5567 Cont.
zoning and uses.He said that a majority of the uses were
nonconforming and that could be a potential problem in
the future.
There was a long discussion about various issues and
comments were offered by several individuals.
Wingfield Martin said he was willing to work with thestaffonacompromiseandaskedforadeferralofat least
30 days.
The motion was made to defer the request for at least
30 days.The motion was approved by a vote of 11 ayes,
0 nays and 0 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(JULY 14'992)
The applicant,Wingfield Martin,was present.There were noobjectors.Mr.Martin discussed the issue briefly,and thenrequestedadeferraltotheNovember17,1992 hearing.
A motion was made to defer the item to the November 17,1992
meeting.The motion was approved by a vote of 10 ayes,
0 nays and 1 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 17,1992)
Staff reported that the applicant had submitted a request towithdrawtheissue.As part of the Consent Agenda,the item
was withdrawn without prejudice.The vote was 9 ayes,
0 nays and 2 absent.
3
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:1 Z-5627
Owner:Chau and Tot Huynh
Applicant:Tot Huynh
Location:10,016 Chicot Road (at Rebecca
Drive)
Request:Rezone from C-3 to C-4
Purpose:Auto Repair —Body Shop
Size:0.42 acres
Existing Use:Commercial
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North —Single-Family and Auto Sales,zoned R-2
South —Vacant,zoned C-3
East —Single-Family,zoned R-2
West —Vacant,zoned C-3
STAFF ANALYSIS
The request for 10,016 Chicot Road is to rezone the property
from C-3 to C-4 for auto repair,a body shop.10,016 Chicot
Road is located at the southwest corner of Rebecca Drive andChicot,which is situated approximately one-quarter mile
north of Mabelvale Cut-off.At this time,the site is
occupied by two structures,a car wash and a brick building,
which is being used for a laundromat.The property in
question was rezoned to C-3 in 1982 as part of the South
Central Island annexation (Z-3806).
Zoning in the general vicinity includes R-2,R-7,0-1,0-3,C-3 with C-3 land abutting the site on two sides.A
majority of the nonresidential zoning was accomplished aspartoftheSouthCentralIslandPlanandannexation.Land
use is a mixture of single family,office,commercial,
warehousing and a mobile home park.The existing commercial
uses are primarily retail or service oriented.There arealsosomenonconforminguses,including a small auto saleslotdirectlyacrossRebecca.Throughout the neighborhood,there are undeveloped parcels and vacant buildings.
When the South Central Island Plan was developed,the basicconceptwastorecognizeasmanyoftheexistingusesaspossibleandcreatearationalzoningpattern.Also,aconscienceeffortwasmadetoestablishC-3 as the highest
zoning for the neighborhood because it was more compatiblewiththeresidentialuses.Staff determined that it would
1
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:1 Z-5627 Cont.
have been detrimental to the area to rezone certain uses to
C-4,and our position has not changed.Rezoning the site
under consideration to C-4 would be undesirable and could
have an adverse impact on the nearby properties.
The adopted plan for the area,Geyer Springs West,shows the
property for commercial use and reinforces the zoning plan
that was implemented with the adoption of South Central
Island Plan.Over the years,the City has maintained the
plan's recommended land use and zoning patterns and there is
no strong justification to change the direction at this time
by supporting the proposed C-4 reclassification.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
Dedication of additional right-of-way is required for Chicot
Road.The Master Street Plan standard is 45 feet and the
existing right-of-way is 37.5 feet.Therefore,7.5 feet
needs to be dedicated to satisfy the minor arterial
requirement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of a C-4 rezoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 17,1992)
The applicant was not present when this item was first
called and it was moved to the end of the agenda.The
applicant was still not in attendance when the request wastobeheardbythePlanningCommission.After some
discussion,the motion was made to defer the issue to the
December 15,1992 meeting.The motion was approved by a
vote of 10 ayes,0 nays and 1 absent.
2
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:2 Z-5628
Owner:Gerald,Dorothy,Gerald,Jr.,
and Catherine Martindill
Applicant:Gregory Hopkins
Location:South University and Mabelvale
Pike (southwest corner)
Request:Rezone from C-3 to C-4
Purpose:Auto Sales and Service
Size:1.61 acres
Existing Use:Commercial
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North —Commercial and Auto Sales,zoned C-3
South —Auto Sales,zoned I-2
East —Auto Sales,zoned C-4 and I-2
West —Single-Family,zoned R-2
STAFF ANALYSIS
The southwest corner of South University and Mabelvale PikeiszonedC-3,and the request is to rezone the site to C —4forautosalesandservice.At this time,there are two
structures on the property.One building is an eating
establishment and the other has several commercial uses init.A residence,which faced the intersection of Mabelvale
Pike and Greenway Drive,has been removed.The site hasstreetfrontageonthreestreetswitha 190 feet of frontage
on South University side.The high point of the property is
on Mabelvale Pike side and decreases in elevation from westtoeast.
Zoning along this portion of South University is a
combination of C-3,C-4 and I-2,with the site abutting I-2
on the south.Across South University,the zoning is C-4
and to the north,the zoning is C-3 and C-4.West of
Mabelvale Pike,the area is zoned R-2.Land use includes
single family,commercial,a bank,auto sales and service,
outdoor sales and a church.As with the R-2 zoning,theestablishedsinglefamilyneighborhood,the MeadowcliffSubdivision,is located west of Mabelvale Pike.In the
immediate vicinity,the primary use is auto sales and someservice.
1
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:2 Z-5628 Cont.
The 65th Street West Plan shows the property as part of a
linear commercial area that extends along South University
to the north and south.The City has endorsed both C-3 and
C-4 zoning for the recommended land use pattern.Therefore,
the proposed C-4 conforms to the adopted plan and staffs
support the reclassification.The C-4 should not impact the
residential area because it appears that the existing
zoning,which includes I-2,has not created any problems for
the nearby residential lots.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
There are none to be reported.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the C-4 rezoning as requested.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 17,1992)
The applicant was present.There were no objectors and the
item was placed on the Consent Agenda.The Commission voted
9 ayes,0 nays and 2 absent to recommend approval of the C-4
rezoning.
2
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.'Z-3271-A
Owner:James and Helen Pate
Applicant:John Rees
Location:Fluid Drive
Request:Rezone from C-3 to I-2
Purpose:Tire Sales and Recapping
Size:5.62 acres
Existing Use:Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North —Vacant,zoned R-2
South —I-440 Right-of-Way,zoned I-2
East —Office Warehouse,zoned C-3
West —Vacant and Single-Family,zoned R-2 and I-2
STAFF ANALYSIS
The request before the Commission is to rezone two lots
on Fluid Drive from C-3 to I-2 for a retail and industrialuser.(The lots are part of the River Subdivision.)Aconditionalusepermithasalsobeenrequestedforthe
same property because the proposed industrial use,tirerecapping,falls under "industrial uses not listed(enclosed)"which is a conditional use.(See Item No.4 onthisagendafortheconditionalusepermitrequest.)FluidDriveislocatednorthofthePortIndustrialareaandwestofthe1-440/Fourche Dam Pike Interchange.The site is
undeveloped and there are a number of pecan trees on it.
The property in question was rezoned to a commercialdistrictin1979.The request was initially filed for anindustrialrezoning,however,the Planning Commissiondeniedtheindustrialrequestandsupportedacommercialreclassificationfortheproperty.
Zoning in the area is R-2,C-3,I-2,with a majority of thelotswithintheRiverSubdivisionzonedC-3.One lot ispartoftheI-2 area which is found to the west of the siteunderconsideration.The R-2 areas and lots are located tothenorthandwest.Land use includes single family,churches,commercial,office warehouse and an elementary
1
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:3 Z-3271-A Cont.
school.The single family residences are part of the large
subdivision which is to the west and northwest of the site.
Several of the C-3 parcels are undeveloped as is the largeI-2 area to the west.The land directly to the north is
vacant,however,it appears that it has been used as a
community ballfield over the years.
The Port District Plan shows the property as part of a
commercial area that extends from Fourche Dam Pike to the
western boundary of the site.Other recommended land uses
designated on the plan are single family,public,
research/business and light industrial.The plan also
recommends a 50 foot buffer adjacent to the residentiallots.After careful review of the proposed rezoning and
the plans,staff feels that industrial reclassification is
not an unreasonable option for some of the property.This
position is reinforced by the fact that the City rezoned
a large area to the west,adjoining the residential
subdivision,to I-2.
The primary issue with a rezoning in this immediate vicinityisprotectingtheintegrityoftheresidentialneighborhood.
To insure that any reclassification will not impact the
subdivision,a substantial land use buffer is needed.
Because of the requested I-2 and the proposed use,staff
recommends a 100 foot OS area adjacent to the residentiallotsandthattheOSareaextend100feettothesouth.An
OS buffer,approximately 100 by 280 feet in size,would helppreservethelivabilityofthelotstothewestandalso
maintain at least one row of pecan trees.The existingtreesarematureandwillactasastrongvisibleseparation
between the proposed industrial development and theresidentialuses.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
There are none to be reported.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the I-2 with a 100 foot OS areaadjacenttotheresidentiallots.The OS zoning should
extend 100 feet south of the lots.
2
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.3 2-3271-A Cont.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 17,1992)
The applicant,John Rees,was in present.There were threeobjectorsinattendance.
Staff informed the Commission that the sign was posted on
the site less than the required 30 days because the
application was filed late.Therefore,the Commission would
need to waive the Bylaws prior to hearing their request.
John Rees addressed the application,the sign issue and thenotices.Mr.Rees said the signs were posted around
November 7 and the notice were mailed the required 15 daysbeforethehearing.He then asked that the Bylaw
requirement be waived.Mr.Rees also asked some questions
about the recommended open space area.
Terry Burruss,architect for the project,spoke and said
the plan could accommodate the 100 foot OS area and
discussed the staff's recommendation.Mr.Burruss described
the pecan trees on the property and reviewed the site plan.
Mr.Burruss said the plan should be able preserve at least
one row of trees.
At this time,.the Commission took action on the Bylaw
requirement for posting the sign.The vote was 6 ayes and
3 nays to waive the Bylaws.
Bonnie George,property owner in the Richland AcresSubdivision,presented a petition opposed to the I-2
rezoning.Ms.George said there are problems in the
neighborhood and described the area,which includes a school
and several churches.Ms.George said she has the most tolosebecauseherlotsaredirectlyadjacenttothesite,andtherezoningwouldlowerpropertyvalues.
Mary Lett,a resident in the subdivision,said the
neighborhood is having a problem trying to keep it a
community.Ms.Lett described the area and the ballfielddirectlynorthofthesiteunderconsideration.She saidtheresidentsarestrugglingtokeepaviableneighborhood.
Ms.Lett said she is worried about possible smells from thetirerecapping,and is opposed to the I-2.She also toldtheCommissionthatachurchisinoppositiontotheI-2
rezoning.Ms.Lett said that there is available land intheIndustrialParkfortheuse.Ms.Lett concluded bysayingthatsheisconcernedwithoutsidestorage,noise
and traffic.
3
November 17,1992
ITEM NO 3 Z-3271-A Cont
Phil Pesek,representing Fluid Components,Inc.,the usertotheeast,spoke in opposition to the I-2 rezoning.
Mr.Pesek said there is a big difference between C-3 andI-2.Mr.Pesek also said that the Fluid Components buildingdoesnotdetractfromtheareaandthecompanydoesnotwanttobeinanI-2 area.Mr.Pesek asked the Commission to
keep the site C-3 because rezoning it to I-2 would impactthearea.
There were some discussion and Commissioner Putnam informedtheCommissionthatFluidComponent's property has been onthemarketforthreeyears.
Stan McClellan,Plant Manager for TREADCO in North Little
Rock,spoke and said TREADCO only the uses the state of theartforretreading,and they are the largest in the nation.
Mr.McClellan described the process as the wet vacuum system
and said there is very little noise outside the building and
no burning.He said nothing is visible from the outside anddoesnotforeseeanyproblemswiththe100footOSbuffer.
Mr.McClellan said they would work to save as many trees aspossibleandthewestsideofthepropertycouldbeprotected.Mr.McClellan went on to say that the existingsiteinNorthLittleRockhashadnocomplaintsfromtheneighborhoodandthefacilityhasrunoutofspace.He toldtheCommissionthatthereisnooutsidestorageandtheyservicetrucktires.Mr.McClellan said the hours ofoperationarefrom6:00 a.m.to 5:30 p.m.,Monday throughFriday,and the company has some retail sales.
Terry Burruss spoke again and said the site plan could
accommodate the 100 foot OS area and an effort was made tokeepthetruckparkingawayfromtheresidentialarea.
Stan McClellan responded to some questions and said theproductiontakesplaceMondaythroughFriday,with theretailsalesonSaturdayfrom8:00 a.m.to 12:00 p.m.
Mary Lett told the Commission that the neighborhood is goingtoceaseexistingiftherezoningisgrantedandtheCityneedstoprotectit.
Larry Jacimore,representing the owners,said that one lotintheRiverSubdivisionisalreadyrezonedI-2,however,itdoesnotworkfortheproposeduse.
There was some discussion about various issues,includingusingthePIDprocessforthesite.Several commissionerssaidthatfutureapplicationsintheareaneededtobedoneasPUDstoprotecttheneighborhood.Staff reminded theCommissionthataPIDisthelong-form process.
4
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:3 Z-3271-A Cont.
John Rees agreed with the PID concept and said it is thebestapproachfortheneighborhood.Mr.Rees then discussed
some of the uses allowed in C-3.Mr.Rees then asked the
Commission to withdraw the I-2 rezoning and reconsider the
request as a PID,with a 100 foot OS area,no outsidestorage,specific hours of operation and no noise.
Bonnie George and Mary Lett said they are still opposed totheuse.
A motion was made to recommend approval of the PID as
requested subject to the conditions stated earlier as tobuffers,trees,hours of operations and all of the otherconditionssetforthintheoriginal1-2/conditional use
permit application.Prior to the vote on the motion,there
was some discussion on the hours of operation.Staff saidthehoursforproductionaretobe6:00 a.m.to 5:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday and retail sales on Saturdays from8:00 a.m.to 12:00 p.m.,with no production.Stan McClellanaskedthattherebesomeflexibilityin the hours andproductionbeallowedonSaturdayfrom6:00 a.m.to12:00 p.m.The Commission voted on the motion,includinqtheadditionalproductionhours.The vote was 9 ayes,1 nay
and 1 absent in favor of the motion.
5
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:4 FILE NO Z-3271-B
NAME:TREADCO —Conditional Use Permit
LOCATION:7510 Fluid Drive
OWNER APPLICANT:James and Helen Pate/John Rees,
Agent for TREADCO,Inc.
PROPOSAL:To construct a 60,000 square footfacilitytobeusedprimarilyfor
the sales and installation of new
and used tires,and also for the
remanufacturing of old tires
(recapping).This proposal is
associated with Item No.3,a
proposal to rezone this propertyto"I-2"from "C-3".
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1.Site Location
This site is located at the end of Fluid Drive which islocatednorthwestoftheintersectionofI-440 and Fourche
Dam Pike.
2.Com atibilit with Nei hborhood
Although the predominance of the zoning in this area isindustrial,there is still a substantial area of residential
immediately adjacent to this site.
Directly north of this site is a large tract (approximatelysixacres)of "R-2"zoned property,currently occupied byseveralabandonedandovergrownballfields.North of this"R-2"property is the Badgett School.
Directly northwest of this site is Richland Acres Addition,
a developed residential subdivision of approximately 200
homes.A portion of Richland Acres is adjacent to the siteinquestion.
South of Richland Acres and directly west of the proposed
TREADCO site is a large tract of vacant "I-2"property.
I-440 is south of this site and a group of "C-3"zoned lotsaretotheeast,only one of which is currently developed.
The proposed use appears to be compatible with the area withattentionbeinggiventobufferingtheadjacentresidentialproperty.
1
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.'ont FILE NO 2-3271-B
3.On-Site Drives and Parkin
The site plan,as submitted,shows 66 parking spaces,noneofwhichareindicatedashandicap.There is a large pavedareaeastofthebuildingwhichtheapplicanthasindicatedwillbeutilizedastruckmaneuveringarea.Circulation andparkingareadequate.
4.Screenin and Buffers
The property is currently an old pecan orchard,withapproximately100maturetreesonit.The site plan,assubmitted,shows no screening or buffers.There is adequateareasetasideforbuffersandlandscapingontheplan.
The "R-2"zoned property to the north and to the west mustbescreenedandbufferedfromthisproject.The "C-3"zonedpropertytotheeastmustalsobescreenedandbufferedfromthisdevelopment.The last row of pecan trees,on the westside,should be saved and included in the required buffer.The buffer ordinance requires that a 6 foot opaque screenextendtheentirelengthofthispropertywhereitisadjacenttothe"R-2"and "C-3"zoning.
5.Cit En ineer Comments
Install sidewalk for the length of the property adjacent toFluidDrive.Indicate handicap parking spaces.
6.Utilit Comments
There are none at the time of this writing.
7.A~1
On the whole,this proposal appears good.Special attentionmustbegiventocomplyingwiththelandscapeandzoningbufferordinancestoadequatelyprotecttheadjacent"R-2"and "C-3"zoned properties
The applicant has indicated that.there will be an area ofoutsidestorageoftires.This area needs to be indicatedaswellasanyproposedscreeningofthestoragearea.
8.Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval subject to compliance with theCityEngineer's comments and the City's landscape and zoningbufferordinancetoadequatelyscreentheadjacent
2
November 17,1992
ITEM NO.:4 Cont.FILE NO.:Z-3271-B
properties of lower zoning designations.Staff also
recommends that the last row of mature pecan trees on the
west be saved.As this plan indicates more than required
parking,the applicant could redesign the west parking lot
to save these trees.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(NOVEMBER 17,1992)
This item was withdrawn by the Commission,merged with Item No.3
(Z-3271-A)and refiled as a PID.
The vote on the motion to withdraw this item was 9 ayes,0 noes,
1 absent and 1 abstention (Oleson).For further information,see
File No.Z-3271-A).
3
PlANNING COMMISSION VOTE RECORD
DATE NO 'I I 1 CaN SMT ~.C~DA ~REC~umF-
MEMBER z.1
BALL,RAMSEY
v'HACHERE,DIANE v
v'ILLIS,EMMETT A v.V
MCDANIEL,JOHN
NICHOLSON,JERILYN V
OLESON,KATHLEEN
e'ONTUNGELN,JIM
PUTNAM,BILL V
WOODS,RONALD
v''ELZ,
JOE H.A A A A
WALKER,BRAD
TIME IN AND TIME OUT
BALL,RAMSEY
CHACHERE,DIANE
WILLIS,EMMETT (g A&I 05 A A
MCDANIEL,JOHN
NICHOLSON,JERILYN
OLESON,KATHLEEN
VONTUNGELN,JIM
PUTNAM,BILL
WOODS,RONALD
SELZ,JOE H.A
WALKER,BRAD
I
Meeting Adjourned I 'M P.M.
~AYE ~NAYE ~ABSENT 4~ABSTAIN
November 17,1992
There being no further business before the Commission,the
meeting was adjourned at 1:45 p.m.
Se e ary a'rman