pc_05 31 2001M
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBDIVISION HEARING
SUMh9LRY AND MINUTE RECORD
MAY 31,2001
4:00 P.M.
I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being seven in number.
II.Approval of the Minutes of the April 19,2001 meeting.
The minutes were approved as mailed.
III.Members Present:Rohn MuseBillRector
Mizan Rahman
Fred Allen,Jr.
Pam Adcock
Obray Nunnley
Craig Berry
Members Absent:Judith Faust
Richard Downing
Bob Lowry
One (1)Open Position
City Attorney:Cindy Dawson
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBDIVISION AGENDA
MAY 31,2001
I.DEFERRED ITEMS:
A.Cook Restoration —Revised PD-C (Z-5959-A)
3204 Old Shackleford Road
B.Autumn Subdivision (Lot 2)—Revised Subdivision Site
Plan Review (S-1096-D)
1012/1014 Autumn Road
I I .PRELMINARY PLAT S:
1.Chenal Valley (Phases 28 and 29)—Preliminary Plat
(S-867-KKKK)
North end of LaMarche Drive
2.Doyne Subdivision —Revised Preliminary Plat (S-1232-B)
Southwest corner of Tall Timber Blvd.and Tall Pine Blvd.
3.Colonel Glenn Commercial Subdivision —Revised
Preliminary Plat (S-1240-C)
Southwest,corner of I-430 and Colonel Glenn Road
4.Cantrell Loops Subdivision —Preliminary Plat (S-1310)
North side of Cantrell Road at Taylor Loop Road
(east leg):
4.1.Cantrell Loops Subdivision (Lot 1)
Short-Form PD-C (Z-7022)
North side of Cantrell Road at Taylor Loop
Road (east leg)
III.PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENTS:
5.Republic Industries —Revised PCD (Z-4484-B)
9812 I-30
6.Wade —Short-Form POD (Z-4741-A)
5100 "B"Street
Agenda,Page Two
III.PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENTS:(Cont.)
7.Pinnacle Bank —Revised PD-0 (Z-5282-B)
Northeast corner of Rodney Parham and North Rodney
Parham Roads
8.West Park Office Centre —Long-Form PCD (Z-7025)
Northeast corner of Bowman and Kanis Roads
IV.SITE PLAN REVIEWS:
9.Landers —Subdivision Site Plan Review (S-1309)
3201 West 65 Street
10.Freeway Business Park (Lot 1)—Subdivision Site Plan
Review (S-1311)
Northeast corner of West 12 Street and Rodney
Parham Road
11.Markham Center Scpxare —Subdivision Site Plan Review
(S-1312)
9101 West Markham Street
12.The Ranch (Lot B-5)—Zoning Site Plan Review (Z-7023)
North side of Cantrell Road,approximately 600 feeteastofRanchBlvd.
13.Chenal Valley (Tract 6A)—Zoning Site Plan Review
(Z-7024)
Northwest corner of Rahling Road and Chenal
Valley Drive
14.Wingate Hotel —Zoning Site Plan Review (Z-7026)
West side of Shackleford Road,approximately 250 feet
south of Kanis Road
V.OTHER MATTERS:
15.Brodie Creek —Long-Form PRD —Partial Revocation
(Z-5963-B)
West side of Bowman Road,approximately one (1)mile
south of Kanis Road
16.Master Parks Plan
12
4
41
H
10
CO
U
N
Pu
b
ic
He
a
r
i
n
g
It
e
m
s
N
6
62
,
1
1
Q
LE
E
R/
V
g
PR
I
D
E
VA
L
L
E
Y
MA
HA
M
MA
R
K
M
2'
1-
6
3
o
CI
T
Y
UM
I
T
S
KA
N
I
S
I —63
0
NA
R
I
S
I
2T
H
9
E.
6
TH
15
6'
1
0
=
5
g
WR
I
G
H
T
o
(
CO
T
ON
E
,
I-
30
14
RO
O
S
E
V
E
L
T
o~
g
+4
DA
M
36
T
H
RO
O
S
E
V
E
L
T
LA
W
S
O
N
1-
4
4
0
~4
4
,
—
4
LA
VY
S
T
M
8
FR
A
Z
I
E
R
PI
K
E
3
ZE
U
B
E
R
DA
V
I
D
C'
i
0
DO
D
D
65
T
H
65
T
H
RA
I
N
E
S
c
VA
L
L
E
Y
IT
Y
LI
M
I
T
S
65
9
16
7
DI
X
O
N
BA
S
E
L
I
N
E
BA
S
E
L
I
N
E
4
o~
I
1
W
DI
X
O
N
HA
R
P
E
R
OT
T
E
R
MA
VA
CU
T
O
F
F
CR
E
E
K
MA
B
E
L
V
A
L
E
~
SL
I
N
K
E
R
WE
S
T
CL
VI
N
S
O
N
o
I
1
3
PJ
DR
E
H
E
R
AL
E
X
A
N
D
E
R
GE
Y
E
R
SP
G
S
I
C
OF
F
CU
T
O
F
F
CU
T
O
F
F
V
c Q
o
CI
T
Y
LI
M
I
T
S
EL
16
7
65
36
5
AS
H
E
R
o~
PR
A
T
T
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Ag
e
n
d
a
Ma
y
31
,
20
0
1
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:A FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
NAME:Cook Restoration —Revised PD-C
LOCATION:3204 Old Shackleford Road
DEVELOPER:ARCHITECT:
Skip Cook Terry Burrus
3204 Old Shackleford Road 1202 Main Street
Little Rock,AR 72221 Little Rock,AR 72202
AREA:1.30 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:PD-C ALLOWED USES:Office-Warehouse and C-3
permitted uses
PROPOSED USE:Office-Warehouse and C-3
permitted uses
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
Deferral of street improvements to Old Shackleford Road for
five (5)years.
BACKGROUND:
On May 2,1995,the Board of Directors passed Ordinance No.16,879 and 16,880.Ordinance No.16,879 rezoned this propertytoPD-C for an office-warehouse,with C-3 permitted uses asalternateusesforthesite.Ordinance No.16,880 granted adeferralofstreetimprovementstoOldShacklefordforfive (5)years or until other construction along Old Shackleford Road.
The latter Ordinance expired last year.
The approved site plan for this property included a paved and
landscaped parking area.To date,the parking area has not been
paved or landscaped.A permanent Certificate of Occupancy wasalsoneverissuedforthewarehousebuilding.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The current property owner,Skip Cook,recently purchased
the property not knowing of the deficiencies that exist,
nor of the expired deferral of street improvements.
Therefore,Mr.Cook requests an additional five (5)yeardeferralforthestreetimprovementstoOldShackleford
Road and two (2)year deferral to pave the parking area.It has been noted that any required landscape upgrades will
be made.No other changes are proposed to the existingsiteplan.
Cook Restoration Systems is the business that currently
occupies the property.This business is a full servicerestorationcontractor,specializing in insurance relatedrepairandgeneralremodeling,both residential and
commercial.The facilities at this location include office
and warehouse use.The existing hours of operation are8:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m.,Monday-Friday.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There are two (2)existing buildings on the site,a 1,727
square foot office and a 2,400 square foot warehousestructure.There is a gravel parking area along thebuildings'outh side.
There are commercial uses across Old Shackleford Road totheeastandsoutheast,with undeveloped property to the
north (Summit Mall PCD)and west (R-2).There are several
single Family residences and an auto repair business to the
south,between this property and West 36 Street.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
Staff has received no comment from the neighborhood as ofthiswriting.The Kensington Place,John Barrow and
Stagecoach-Dodd Neighborhood Associations were notified ofthepublichearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Old Shackleford Road is classified on the Master Street
Plan as a collector street.Dedicate right-of-way to
30 feet from centerline.
2.Provide design of street conforming to "MSP"(Master
Street Plan).Construct one-half street improvements to
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
this street including 5-foot sidewalk with planned
development.
3.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
4.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.5.Driveways shall conform to Sec.31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.Close one driveway.
6.Pave parking lot and show parking layout.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer main extension required with easements to
serve property.
Entergy:No Comment received.
ARKLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:Notify utility if any groundwork will be
done.Contact Southwestern Bell for details.
Water:Contact the Water Works if larger and/or additional
meter(s)are required.
Fire Department:No Comment.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
This request is located in the I-430 Planning District.
The Land Use Plan shows Mixed Office Commercial for this
property.The applicant has applied for a revision of anexistingPlannedDevelopment—Commercial district.The
applicant wishes to file for an extension of the 5-year
deferral of half street improvements and a parking
improvement deferral.A land use plan amendment is not
required.
Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the
Pecan Lake,Westwood,Stagecoach-Dodd Neighborhood Action
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
Plan within the Stagecoach-Dodd section of the plan.The
Stagecoach-Dodd section of the plan has the objective of
maintaining adequate separation between residential and
non-residential uses.The Stagecoach-Dodd section of the
plan also contains an action statement of "encouraging the
development of non-residential uses west of Shackleford
Road and north of David 0 Dodd Road."
Landsca e Issues:
A total of 18 shrubs 18"in height at planting are required
south of the vehicular use area.
A small amount of landscaping between the public parking
area and building is required.
It will be necessary to protect landscaped areas from
vehicular traffic with a landscape border.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MARCH 29,2001)
Skip Cook and Terry Burrus were present,representing the
application.Staff briefly described the revised PD-C,
noting several items which needed to be shown on the site
plan.Staff also stated that a separate plan needed to be
submitted showing the future asphalt parking details.
The deferral of street improvements to Old Shackleford Road
was discussed.Bob Turner,Director of Public Works,
indicated support of the deferral.The deferral of paving
required for the parking area was also discussed.Staff
suggested paving the east (front)portion of the parking
area,where subject to passenger vehicle parking and
leaving the rear portion of the parking area gravel for
truck parking.Staff suggested a paving deferral for therearparkingareaonly.Mr.Cook stated that he would take
these suggestions under consideration.
The landscape requirements were briefly discussed.It was
noted that an upgrade in landscaping would be required.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the revised
PD-C to the full Commission for resolution.
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on
April 4,2001.The revised site plan addresses the issues
as raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee.The
dumpster area with screening,existing building heights,
ground-mounted sign and areas for landscaping upgrades have
been shown on the revised site plan.
The applicant notes that the ground-mounted sign will have
a maximum height of six (6)feet and a maximum area of 64
square feet.This conforms to the ordinance requirementsforofficesignage.Staff has no problem with the sign
proposed.
The revised plan shows the areas of landscaping upgrades as
required in paragraph F.of this report.A total of 18
shrubs will be planted along the south property line,with
an area of building landscaping also provided.
The revised site plan also shows that ten (10)vehicles can
park within the existing gravel parking area.A minimum of
ten (10)spaces would typically be required by ordinance to
serve an office-warehouse development of this size.
In addition to be revised site plan,the applicant has
submitted a future paving plan for the parking area.As
noted in paragraph A.,the applicant is requesting a two
(2)year deferral for the parking lot paving.The
applicant notes that when the parking area is paved,the
northernmost drive from Old Shackleford Road will be
removed as requested by Public Works.The future asphalt
parking plan shows a total of ten (10)parking spaces,an
area for truck maneuvering and landscaping areas.Staff
supports the two (2)year deferral for paving the parkingareaandthefutureparkingplanasproposed.
Also noted in paragraph A.,the applicant is requesting anadditionalfive(5)year deferral for the required street
improvements to Old Shackleford Road.Public Works
supports the deferral of street improvements for five (5)
years or until adjacent development,whichever occursfirst.The revised site plan notes that the additional
five (5)feet of right-of-way will be dedicated as
required.
5
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
As noted in the background paragraph,a permanent
Certificate of Occupancy was never issued for the warehouse
building.The Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.)was not
issued at the time the warehouse building was completed
because the pavement of the parking area and installation
of landscaping was not done.For some unknown reason the
Building Codes staff never followed up on the C.O.
Recently,the Zoning Enforcement staff flagged the property
and issued a notice to comply with the previously approvedsiteplanorapplyforarevision,as the applicant has
done.
The applicant has noted that he has met with the Building
Codes staff and is working to resolve the C.O.issue.If
the Planning Commission approves the Revised PD-C with the
deferral of parking lot paving,staff feels that it would
be reasonable to issue a C.O.after a building inspectionismadeandapproved,the additional right-of-way is
dedicated,the dumpster area is screened and the upgrade in
landscaping is completed.
Otherwise,to staff'knowledge,there are no outstanding
issues associated with the Revised PD-C.Given the historyofthisproperty,staff feels that the applicant's Revised
PD-C plan is reasonable and should have no adverse impact
on the general area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the Revised PD-C subject to
the following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D,E and F of this report.
2.Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away
from adjacent residential property.3.The dumpster area must be screened on three (3)side with
an eight (8)foot high opaque fence or wall.
4.The ground-mounted sign must conform to the ordinanceofficestandardsasnotedinparagraphH.of this report.5.The PD-C is approved for Cook Restoration Systems and C-3
permitted uses (as previously approved).
6.Staff supports a two (2)year deferral for paving the
parking area and removing the northernmost drive.
6
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5959-A
7.Staff recommends approval of the deferral of street
improvements to Old Shackleford Road for five (5)years
or until adjacent development,whichever occurs first.
8.Staff recommends that a Certificate of Occupancy be
issued for the property based on the conditions as noted
in paragraph H.of this report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(APRIL 19,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted aletteronApril12,2001 requesting that this item be deferred
to the May 31,2001 agenda,due to the fact that an abstractlistwasnotobtainedintimetocompletetherequired
notifications.Staff supported the deferral request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the May 31,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays and 3 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
7
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:B FILE NO.:S-1096-D
NAME:Autumn Subdivision (Lot 2)—Revised Subdivision Site
Plan Review
LOCATION:1012/1014 Autumn Road
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Central AR Land Development Co.Central Arkansas Engineering
1012 Autumn Road,Suite 1 1012 Autumn Road,Suite 2LittleRock,AR 72211 Little Rock,AR 72211
AREA:2.18 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ALLOWED USES:General Office PROPOSED USE:General Office
VARIANCE S/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
Variance for a reduced rear yard building setback
BACKGROUND:
On May 11,2000,the Planning Commission approved the Autumn
Subdivision —Preliminary Plat.The subdivision included 6.43acresandthree(3)lots.On June 22,2000,the Planning
Commission approved a site plan for Lot 2,Autumn Subdivision.
Lot 2 contains an existing 5,590 square foot (one-story)office
building and 24 parking spaces.The multiple building site plan
approved for Lot 2 was to take place in the following phases:
Phase 1 —A 7,014 square foot (single-story)office
building and 58 parking spaces.
Phase II —A 15,000 square foot (two-story)office
building and 38 parking spaces.
To date,none of the Autumn Subdivision has been finalplatted.The applicant notes that the various property
owners are working toward obtaining a final plat,but it is
expected to take several more months.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:B FILE NO.:S-1096-D
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approvedsiteplanforLot2,Autumn Subdivision.The only proposed
change in the previously approved plan involves moving the
approved phase line.The owner of the east half of the
proposed Lot 2 is ready to construct the 7,014 square foot
(one-story)office building as shown on the approved site
plan.Therefore,the owner proposes to move the phase linetoalignwiththecurrentownership(property)line.It is
the owner's intent to purchase the remainder of Lot 2,final plat that lot within the next year,and continue with
Phase II of this development.
Based on the fact that the applicant proposes to move the
phase line to align with the current property line,a rear
yard setback variance is required.The minimum requiredrearyardsetbackin0-3 zoning is 15 feet.The rear yardsetbackforthenewbuildinginPhaseIwouldbe5feet.
The existing office building on the site maintains a rearsetbackof6.5 feet.
Based on the fact that the preliminary plat will expire on
May 11,2001 and the property transaction is expected totakeseveralmoremonths,the applicant is also requestingaone(1)year time extension for the previously approvedpreliminaryplat.This will allow the property owners timetoworkoutdetailsandfinalplattheproperty.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There is an existing office building on the proposed Lot 2,
Autumn Subdivision.There is a mixture of office and
commercial uses to the north along Chenal Parkway and totheeastacrossAutumnRoad.There is undeveloped propertyimmediatelysouthofthissite,with an office building and
two single family residences further south along the northsideofKanisRoad.There is a contractor's maintenance
yard to the west an office/mini-warehouse development tothenorthwest.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
The Birchwood and John Barrow Neighborhood Associations
were notified of the public hearing.As of this writing,staff has received no comment from the neighborhood.
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:B FILE NO.:S-1096-D
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
Same Comments as reviousl submitted on S-1096-C as
follows:
1.Autumn Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as acollectorstreet.Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from
centerline.
2.Provide design of street conforming to "MSP"(MasterStreetPlan).Construct one-half street improvements tothisstreetincluding5-foot sidewalk with planned
development.
3.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.4.Autumn Road has a 1998 average daily traffic count of3,300.
5.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
New Comment:1.Furnish sidewalk easement if right-of-way dedication isinsufficienttocontainsidewalk.
With Buildin Permit:
2.Provide existing topographical information at maximum 5-
foot contour interval and 100-year base flood elevation.3.A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan,per Sec.29-186 (e),will be required.
4.A Grading Permit,per Sec.29-186 (c)&(d),will be
required.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Entergy:No Comment received.
AEQKA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:Consider utility easement and conduit to
supply service to rear building.Contact Southwestern Bellfordetails.
Water:On site fire protection will be required.Fire
protection may be limited due to existing 6"water line.
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:B FILE NO.:S-1096-D
Hydraulic analysis will be performed as plans and
requirements are provided to Water Works.Acreage fees of
$150 per acre apply in addition to normal charges.Are
Phase 1 and Phase 2 all one parcel?
Fire Department:Private fire hydrant will be required.
Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is located near bus route 45,but has
no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
No Comment.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MARCH 29,2001)
The applicant was out of town and therefore not present.Staff explained the revised site plan to the Committee.
There was very little discussion of the item,as there were
no issues to be resolved.After the brief discussion,the
Committee forwarded the revised site plan to the full
Commission for final action.
H .ANALYSIS:
As noted in paragraph A.,the applicant proposes to revise
the previously approved site plan for Lot 2,Autumn
Subdivision by moving the phase line to align with the
current property line.This is to allow the new building
in Phase 1 to be constructed before the property
transaction for the west one-half of Lot 2 and final
platting of this lot.
In conjunction with the adjustment in the phase line,the
applicant is requesting a variance to allow a reduced rear
yard setback for the new building.The rear yard setback
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:B FILE NO.:S-1096-D
for the new building in Phase I would be 5 feet.The
ordinance requires a minimum setback of 15 feet.Staff
supports the setback variance based on the fact that the
variance will go away when Lot 2 is final platted as shown
on the approved preliminary plat and the existing building
on this property maintains a setback of less than 15 feet
(6.5 feet).
With the adjustment in the phase line,a total of 50
parking spaces will remain in Phase I.The ordinance
requires a minimum of 31 parking spaces to serve the
buildings within Phase I.Staff has no issues with the
proposed phase line adjustment.
Also noted in paragraph A.,the applicant is requesting a
one (1)year time extension for the previously approved
Autumn Subdivision —Preliminary Plat.This will allow the
property owners additional needed time to resolve details
involving the property transaction and final platting.
Staff supports the time extension as requested.
Based on the fact that it is the applicant's intent to
follow through with the final platting of the subdivision
and site plan for Lot 2 as previously approved by the
Planning Commission,staff supports the revision of the
phase line for the Lot 2 development.The revised site
plan should have no adverse impact on the surrounding
property.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the revised site plan for
Lot 2,Autumn Subdivision subject to the following
conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D
and E of this report.
2.Staff supports the variance for reduced rear yard setback
for the new building in Phase I.
3.Staff also recommends approval of a one (1)year time
extension for the Autumn Subdivision —Preliminary Plat.
5
May 31,20011
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO ~:B FILE NO.:S-1096-D
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(APRIL 19,2001)
Staff noted that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on
April 19,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to the
May 3,2001.With a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays and 3 absent,the
Commission voted to waive their bylaws and accept the deferral
request as made by the applicant (less than five working days
prior to the public hearing).Staff supported the deferral
request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the May 3,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays and 3 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 3,2001)
Staff noted that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on
May 3,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to the
May 31,2001.With a vote of 10 ayes,0 nays and 1 absent,the
Commission voted to waive their bylaws and accept the deferral
request as made by the applicant (less than five working days
prior to the public hearing).Staff supported the deferral
request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the May 31,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 10 ayes,0 nays and 1 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff noted that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on
May 31,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to July 12,2001.With a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open
position,the Commission voted to waive their bylaws and accept
the deferral request as made by the applicant (less than five
working days prior to the public hearing).Staff supported the
deferral request.
6
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:1 FILE NO.:S-867-KKKK
NAME:Chenal Valley (Phases 28 and 29)—Preliminary Plat
LOCATION:North end of LaMarche Drive
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Deltic Timber Corporation White-Daters and Associates
¹7 Chenal Club Circle 24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock,AR 72223 Little Rock,AR 72223
AREA:136.81 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:205
FT.NEW STREET:15,600 linear feet
ZONING:R-2/MF-6
PLANNING DISTRICT:19
CENSUS TRACT:42.06
STAFF NOTE:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on May 17,2001
requesting that this application be deferred to the July 12,
2001 Planning Commission agenda.Staff supports the deferral
as requested.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted aletteronMay17,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to
the July 12,2001 agenda.Staff supported the deferral request.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-867-KKKK
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
2
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:2 FILE NO.:S-1232-B
NAME:Doyne Subdivision —Revised Preliminary Plat
LOCATION:Southwest corner of Tall Timber Blvd.and Tall
Pine Blvd.
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Albert Doyne,Sr.McGetrick and McGetrick
4405 East 37 Street 319 E.Markham St.,Ste.202LittleRock,AR 72206 Little Rock,AR 72201
AREA:4.32 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:9
ZONING R-2
PLANNING DISTRICT:12
CENSUS TRACT:24.05
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
BACKGROUND:
The preliminary plat for Doyne Subdivision was approved by the
Planning Commission on January 21,1999.The preliminary platincludedfive(5)lots along Tall Pine Blvd.and one (1)largetract(Lot 6),which fronts on Tall Timber Blvd.On April 21,1999 Lots 1-6 were final platted.To date,single familyresidenceshavebeenconstructedonLots1-5.
A.PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approvedpreliminaryplatforDoyneSubdivision.The applicant
proposes to subdivide Lot 6 (2.9 acres)into four (4)lotsforsinglefamilyresidentialdevelopment.Each of the
proposed lots (Lots 6A —6D)will have street frontage on
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:2 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1232-B
Tall Timber Blvd.Lots 6A —6D will be final platted at
the same time.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The area of Lots 6A —6D is undeveloped with few existingtrees.Single family residences have recently been
constructed on Lots 1-5,along Tall Pine Blvd.
There is a single family residence across Tall Timber Blvd.to the north,with Brodie Creek Park located to the
northeast,also across Tall Timber Blvd.There are single-
family residences immediately west and south of this
property (Pecan Lake Subdivision).Undeveloped single-
family zoned property is located to the east,across Tall
Pine Blvd.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received no comment from the
neighborhood.The Pecan Lake,Westwood,Stagecoach-Dodd
and SWLR UP Neighborhood Associations were notified of the
public hearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
2.Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is
damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy.3.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Entergy:No Comment received.
AIBA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment.
Water:No Comment.
Fire Department:No Comment.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:2 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1232-B
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
No Comment.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Pat McGetrick was present,representing the application.Staff briefly described the revised preliminary plat.Staff noted that the proposed lots (Lots 6A —6D)conform
to all ordinance standards.
In response to a question from staff,Mr.McGetrick noted
that Lots 6A —6D will be final platted at the same time.
There being no further issues for discussion,the Committee
forwarded the revised preliminary plat to the full
Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
As noted in paragraph A.,the applicant proposes to revise
the previously approved preliminary plat for Doyne
Subdivision,by creating four (4)single family residentiallotsoutofthe2.9 acre Lot 6.This results in a net,
increase of three (3)single family residential lots.
Staff noted at the Subdivision Committee meeting that the
proposed lots (6A —6D)conform to all ordinance standards.
Therefore,there should be no unresolved issues with this
application.Staff feels that the proposed revised
preliminary plat will have no adverse impact on the generalarea.
3
May 31,200l
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:2 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1232-B
I.STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat
subject to compliance with the Public Works requirements as
noted in paragraph D.of this report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
4
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:3 FILE NO.:S-1240-C
NAME:Colonel Glenn Commercial Subdivision —Revised
Preliminary Plat
LOCATION:Southwest corner of Interstate 430 and Colonel
Glenn Road
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Vogel Enterprises White-Daters and Associates
11219 Financial Centre Parkway 24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock,AR 72211 Little Rock,AR 72223
AREA:109.55 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:28
FT.NEW STREET:4,650 linear feet
ZONING:0-2/0-3/C-3/C-4
PLANNING DISTRICT:12
CENSUS TRACT:24.05
STAFF NOTE:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on May 16,2001
requesting that this application be deferred to the July 12,
2001 Planning Commission agenda.Staff supports the deferral
as requested.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted a
letter on May 16,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to
the July 12,2001 agenda.Staff supported the deferral request.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:3 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1240-C
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
2
May 31,200~
ITEM NO.:4 FILE NO.:S-1310
NAME:Cantrell Loops Subdivision —Preliminary Plat
LOCATION:North side of Cantrell Road at Taylor Loop Road
(east leg)
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
CLP I-III McGetrick and McGetrick
c/o Tom Cole 319 E.Markham St.,Suite 202
900 S.Shackleford Road Little Rock,AR 72201
Little Rock,AR 72211
AREA:6.54 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:2 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:R-2/C-3
PLANNING DISTRICT:1
CENSUS TRACT:42.05
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
A.PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to subdivide 6.54 acres along the
north side of Cantrell Road (at the east leg of Taylor Loop
Road)into two (2)lots for commercial development.The
property is zoned R-2 and C-3.
The applicant proposes a 60 foot wide access easement
between Lots 1 and 2 as the primary access to the two-lot
development.A second drive is proposed approximately 300
feet to the west along the Lot 1 frontage.
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1310
The proposed plat shows a 100 foot front platted buildinglineasrequiredbytheHighway10OverlayDistrict
Ordinance.A rezoning of Lot 1 from R-2/C-3 to PCD is also
proposed (Item 4.1 on this agenda).
The applicant notes that Lot 1 will be final plattedinitially,with Lot 2 being held on preliminary plat.Lot
2 will be final platted when a development for this lot is
proposed.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There are two (2)abandoned single family residenceslocatedwithinthesouthernportionoftheproperty alongCantrellRoad.The northern portion of the property is
mostly wooded.
There is a commercial development located to the east,with
single family residences to the west.There are commercial
uses at the southwest corner of Cantrell Road and Taylor
Loop Road,with a single family residence at the southeast
corner.The property to the north is undeveloped and zonedR-2.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received several phone calls
(as a result of the posted sign)from persons requesting
information on the application.The Westchester/Heatherbrae,
Secluded Hills and Westbury Neighborhood Associations werenotifiedofthepublichearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Cantrell Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as
a principal arterial.Dedication of right-of-way to 55
feet from centerline will be required.
2.Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
3.Show driveway locations on preliminary plat.
4.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
5.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
6.Grading permit will be required on this development by
Ordinance 18,361.
2
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1310
7.Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway
right-of-way from AHTD,District VI.
8.A grading permit and development permit for special
flood hazard area is required prior to construction.
9.A sketch grading and drainage plan,a special flood
hazard permit,and a special grading permit for flood
hazard areas are required.ADEQ and NPDES permit is
also required.
10.The minimum Finish Floor elevation of 291 feet (msl)is
required to be shown qn plat andgradingplans.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer main extension required with easements to
serve property.
Entergy:A 30 foot easement is requested along the north,
east and west property lines for all three-phase overhead
extensions,no exceptions.Contact utility for details.
ARKLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment received.
Water:An acreage charge in the amount of $300 per acre
applies to this property and a development fee based on the
size of connection will apply for connections larger than
4"to Lot 1 in addition to normal charges.On-site fire
protection may be required.
Fire Department:No Comment.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
No Comment.
3
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1310
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Pat McGetrick and Tom Cole were present,representing the
application.Staff briefly described the proposed
preliminary plat and noted several items which needed to be
shown on the plat drawing.
In response to a question from staff,Mr.McGetrick noted
that Lot 1 would be final platted first,with Lot 2
remaining on preliminary plat until a development is
proposed for that lot.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed.
Public Works representatives noted that a 60 foot wide
access easement would be required between Lots 1 and 2.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the
preliminary plat to the full Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat drawing
to staff on May 16,2001.The revised plat shows all of
the additional notes as required except the source of title
for the property.
The access easement between Lots 1 and 2 has been increased
to 60 feet as required by Public Works.A "no access"
easement has also been shown along the remainder of the Lot
2 frontage.Public Works has reviewed the revised plat and
notes that there are no outstanding issues.
Otherwise,to staff's knowledge there are no outstanding
issues associated with the proposed preliminary plat.The
proposed preliminary plat conforms to the Subdivision
Ordinance and Highway 10 DOD,and should have no adverse
impact on the general area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject
to the following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D
and E of this report.
2.The source of title must be noted on a revised
4
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1310
preliminary plat drawing and submitted to staff.
3.Lot 1 will be final platted first,with Lot 2 being final
platted when a development is proposed for that lot.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Item 4 and 4.1 were discussed simultaneously by the Planning
Commission.
Pat McGetrick and Tom Cole were present,representing the
application.Staff briefly described the preliminary plat and
PD-C rezoning with recommendation of approval subject to the
conditions noted.There were two (2)persons present with
concerns.
Pat McGetrick briefly explained the project.He noted that thesitelightingwouldbelow-level.He also noted that the
Walgreens Store would be a 24-hour operation.The hours of
operation were briefly discussed.Mr.McGetrick noted that if
the 24-hour operation is not feasible,the hours will be
shortened.
Commissioner Muse asked about the C-3 permitted uses as
alternate uses for the property.Staff explained that if
Walgreens vacates the building,another C-3 permitted use could
occupy the structure.
Keith Wingfield addressed the Commission and noted that he
represented Linda Converse,an abutting property owner.He
spoke in favor of the application.He noted that he would like
the record to reflect that the Walgreens property is partially
zoned R-2 and is being rezoned to commercial.
Nathan Culp,president of the Westbury Neighborhood Association,
addressed the Commission with concerns.He noted support of
Walgreens putting a traffic signal at the intersection of Taylor
Loop and Cantrell Roads.He noted concerns with C-3 permitted
uses being alternate uses for the commercial building.
Virginia Strohmeyer-Miles,secretary of the Westbury
Neighborhood Association,concurred with the remarks made by Mr.
Culp.She noted concern that Cantrell Road would not support
additional commercial traffic.She stated that she was
concerned with additional commercial zoning in the area.
5
May 31,200
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1310
Commissioner Adcock asked about a traffic signal at the
intersection of Taylor Loop and Cantrell Roads and if the
developer agreed to pay for and construct the signal.Tad
Borkowski,of Public Works,noted that a signal was warranted
for this intersection.In response to Commissioner Adcock's
cpxestion,Pat McGetrick stated that the applicant would commit
to installing a traffic signal at this intersection as part of
the PD-C development.He stated that the traffic signal would
be installed and operational when the commercial building opens
for business.
Cindy Dawson,City Attorney,stated that this PD-C rezoning had
no bearing on whether the adjacent property owned by Linda
Converse could be rezoned.
There was additional discussion about having C-3 permitted uses
as alternate uses for the development.Jim Lawson,Director of
Planning and Development,explained that if Walgreens vacated
the commercial building,another C-3 permitted use could occupy
the building without further Planning Commission review.He
noted that the site plan could not be significantly altered
without Planning Commission review.
There was a motion to approve the PD-C rezoning subject to the
conditions as recommended by staff and the condition that thetrafficsignalbeinplaceandoperationalpriortoabusiness
opening at this location (intersection of Cantrell Road and theeastlegofTaylorLoopRoad).The motion passed by a vote of
6 ayes,0 nays,3 absent,1 abstention (Rector)and 1 open
position.
There was a second motion to approve the preliminary plat as
recommended by staff.The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,
0 nays,3 absent,1 abstention (Rector)and 1 open position.
6
May 31,200~
ITEM NO.:4.1 FILE NO.:Z-7022
NAME:Cantrell Loops Subdivision (Lot 1)—Short-Form PD-C
LOCATION:North side of Cantrell Road at Taylor Loop Road
(east leg)
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
CLP I-III McGetrick and McGetrick
c/o Tom Cole 319 E.Markham St.,Suite 202
900 S.Shackleford Road Little Rock,AR 72201
Little Rock,AR 72211
AREA:2.275 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:R-2/C-3 ALLOWED USES:Single Family Residential/
Commercial
PROPOSED USE:Commercial
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
A.PROPOSAL/PROQUEST:
The applicant proposes to rezone the proposed Lot 1,
Cantrell Loops Subdivision from R-2/C-3 to PD-C for a
Walgreens Drug Store development.The proposed site plan
shows a single building near the center of the lot,with atotalof14,490 square feet.The building will have a
height of approximately 20 feet.
The proposed development will have two (2)access points,
one (1)from a shared drive between Lots 1 and 2,Cantrell
Loops Subdivision and one (1)from a drive along the Lot 1
frontage approximately 300 feet to the west.The shared
drive between Lots 1 and 2 will align with Taylor Loop
Road.
May 31,200
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
A total of 68 parking spaces is proposed to serve the drugstoredevelopment.A drive-thru window for the pharmacy is
proposed on the north side of the building.
The proposed site plan also shows a ground-mounted sign
near the southeast corner of the parking area.The
applicant notes that the sign will comply with the Highway
10 Design Overlay District.
The applicant notes that the proposed Walgreens Store will
be open 24 hours a day.The applicant is also requesting
C-3 permitted uses as alternate uses for the site should
Walgreens ever vacate the building.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There are two (2)abandoned single family residences
located within the southern portion of the property along
Cantrell Road.The northern portion of the property is
mostly wooded.
There is a commercial development located to the east,with
single family residences to the west.There are commercial
uses at the southwest corner of Cantrell Road and Taylor
Loop Road,with a single family residence at the southeast
corner.The property to the north is undeveloped and zonedR-2.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received several phone calls
(as a result of the posted sign)from persons requesting
information on the application.The Westchester/Heatherbrae,
Secluded Hills and Westbury Neighborhood Associations were
notified of the public hearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Cantrell Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as
a principal arterial.Dedication of right-of-way to 55
feet from centerline will be required.
2.Provide design of street conforming to "MSP"(Master
Street Plan).Construct one-half street improvements to
this street including 5-foot sidewalk with planned
development.
3.Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
2
May 31,200
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
4.Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that
is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to
occupancy.
5.Construct southbound through-lane in addition to the
proposed left and right-turn lanes (100-ft.taper and
150-ft.storage length for turn lanes).
6.Access easement must accommodate street and dual
sidewalks.
7.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
8.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
9.Verify sight distance for driveway on Cantrell Road.
10.Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway
right-of-way from AHTD,District VI.
11.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
12.Grading permit will be required on this development by
Ordinance 18,361.
13.NPDES and grading permits are required prior to
construction,site grading,and drainage plan will need
to be submitted and approved.
14.A sketch grading and drainage plan,a special flood
hazard permit,and a special grading permit for flood
hazard areas are required.ADEQ and NPDES permit is
also required.
15.The minimum Finish Floor elevation of 291 feet (msl)is
required to be shown on plat and grading plans.
16.Maximum driveway width is 36 feet.
E.UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer main extension required with easements to
serve property.
Entergy:A 30 foot easement,is requested along the west
property line for all three-phase overhead extensions,no
exceptions.Contact utility for details.
ARKLA:No Comments received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment received.
Water:An acreage charge in the amount of $300 per acre
applies to this property and a development fee based on the
size of connection will apply for connections larger than
4"to Lot 1 in addition to normal charges.On-site fire
3
May 31,200
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
protection may be required.
Fire Department:Place fire hydrants per City Code.Contact
Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
This request is located in the River Mountain Planning
District.The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this
property.The applicant has applied for a Planned
Development —Commercial for a drug store.The property is
currently zoned R-2 Single Family and C-3 General
Commercial.A land use plan amendment is not required.
Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the
River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan.The Sustainable
Natural Environment goal listed one action statement
relevant to this case.The action statement calls for the
preservation of the Highway 10 Design Overlay District.
Landsca e Issues:
The plan submitted does not allow for the 8 percent
interior landscape islands required within the on-site
paved area.Additionally,a 3-foot wide building landscape
area is required between the public parking area and
building.Considerable flexibility is allowed with the
building landscaping requirement.
An irrigation system to water landscaped areas is required.
A 6-foot high opaque screen,either a wooden fence with its
face side directed outward or dense evergreen plantings,is
required along the northern and western site perimeters.
A minimum of 70%of the northern and western land use
buffers must remain undisturbed.
4
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Pat McGetrick and Tom Cole were present,representing the
application.Staff briefly described the proposed PCD,
noting that some additional project information was needed.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed.It
was noted that the access easement between Lots 1 and 2,
Cantrell Loops Subdivision needed to be increased to 60
feet wide.Public Works noted that the proposed drive
locations were acceptable.
The need for a traffic signal at the intersection of
Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop Road was discussed.
Mr.McGetrick noted that the applicant wished to make a
contribution toward the future traffic signal installation.
The landscape requirements were briefly discussed.Bob
Brown,of the Planning Staff,noted that some additional
interior landscaping would be required.Mr.McGetrick
stated that the additional landscaping would be provided.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the PD-C to
the full Commission for resolution.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on
May 16,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as
raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee.The
dumpster area,screening fence,building height and
additional interior landscaping have been shown on the
revised plan.
The revised plan provides a total of 68 parking spaces.
Thirteen parking spaces have been removed from the
originally submitted plan to allow for additional interior
landscaping.The typical minimum parking requirement for a
commercial use of this size is 52 spaces.Staff supports
the parking plan as proposed.
Public Works has reviewed the revised site plan and notes
that all issues have been resolved.The access easement
between Lots 1 and 2 has been increased to a 60 foot width
and a sidewalk has been shown on each side of this access
5
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
drive as required.The required sidewalk along Cantrell
Road has also been shown.
The proposed site plan shows a ground-mounted sign near the
southeast corner of the parking area.The applicant notes
that this sign will comply with the Highway 10 DOD
requirements.The sign must be monument-type,with a
maximum height of six (6)feet and a maximum area of 100
square feet.
To staff's knowledge,there are no issues left to be
resolved,as the applicant has done a good job in
addressing the issues as raised by staff and the
Subdivision Committee.Staff feels that the proposed
development will have no adverse impact on the general
area,as the site plan conforms to the Highway 10 DOD with
respect to building setbacks,sign details and landscape
and buffer areas.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the PD-C zoning subject to the
following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D,E and F of this report.
2.The proposed ground-mounted sign must conform to the
Highway 10 DOD standards as noted in paragraph H.of this
report.
3.Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away
from adjacent property.
4.The dumpster area must be screened on three (3)sides
with an 8 foot high opaque fence or wall.
5.Staff recommends C-3 permitted uses as alternate uses for
the property.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Item 4 and 4.1 were discussed simultaneously by the Planning
Commi s sion .
Pat McGetrick and Tom Cole were present,representing the
application.Staff briefly described the preliminary plat and
PD-C rezoning with recommendation of approval subject to the
6
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
conditions noted.There were two (2)persons present with
concerns.
Pat McGetrick briefly explained the project.He noted that the
site lighting would be low-level.He also noted that the
Walgreens Store would be a 24-hour operation.The hours of
operation were briefly discussed.Mr.McGetrick noted that if
the 24-hour operation is not feasible,the hours will be
shortened.
Commissioner Muse asked about the C-3 permitted uses as
alternate uses for the property.Staff explained that if
Walgreens vacates the building,another C-3 permitted use could
occupy the structure.
Keith Wingfield addressed the Commission and noted that he
represented Linda Converse,an abutting property owner.He
spoke in favor of the application.He noted that he would like
the record to reflect that the Walgreens property is partially
zoned R-2 and is being rezoned to commercial.
Nathan Culp,president of the Westbury Neighborhood Association,
addressed the Commission with concerns.He noted support of
Walgreens putting a traffic signal at the intersection of Taylor
Loop and Cantrell Roads.He noted concerns with C-3 permitted
uses being alternate uses for the commercial building.
Virginia Strohmeyer-Miles,secretary of the Westbury
Neighborhood Association,concurred with the remarks made by Mr.
Culp.She noted concern that Cantrell Road would not support
additional commercial traffic.She stated that she was
concerned with additional commercial zoning in the area.
Commissioner Adcock asked about a traffic signal at the
intersection of Taylor Loop and Cantrell Roads and if the
developer agreed to pay for and construct the signal.Tad
Borkowski,of Public Works,noted that a signal was warranted
for this intersection.In response to Commissioner Adcock's
question,Pat McGetrick stated that the applicant would commit
to installing a traffic signal at this intersection as part of
the PD-C development.He stated that the traffic signal would
be installed and operational when the commercial building opens
for business.
7
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7022
Cindy Dawson,City Attorney,stated that this PD-C rezoning had
no bearing on whether the adjacent property owned by Linda
Converse could be rezoned.
There was additional discussion about having C-3 permitted uses
as alternate uses for the development.Jim Lawson,Director of
Planning and Development,explained that if Walgreens vacated
the commercial building,another C-3 permitted use could occupy
the building without further Planning Commission review.He
noted that the site plan could not be significantly altered
without Planning Commission review.
There was a motion to approve the PD-C rezoning subject to the
conditions as recommended by staff and the condition that thetrafficsignalbeinplaceandoperationalpriortoabusiness
opening at this location (intersection of Cantrell Road and the
east leg of Taylor Loop Road).The motion passed by a vote of
6 ayes,0 nays,3 absent,1 abstention (Rector)and 1 open
position.
There was a second motion to approve the preliminary plat as
recommended by staff.The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,
0 nays,3 absent,1 abstention (Rector)and 1 open position.
8
May 31,200~
ITEM NO.:5 FILE NO.:Z-4484-B
NAME:Republic Industries —Revised PCD
LOCATION:9812 Interstate 30
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Republic Industries,Inc.None
9812 I-30
Little Rock,AR 72209
AREA:Approximately 0.75 acre NUMBER OF LOTS:1
FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:PCD ALLOWED USES:Office/Showroom with
warehouse
PROPOSED USE:Office/Showroom with
warehouse
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
BACKGROUND:
On October 1,1985 the Board of Directors passed Ordinance No.
14,960 rezoning the property at 9812 I-30 from R-2 to PCD for
C-3 and I-2 permitted uses.The approved site plan included the
building as it currently exists and a paved parking area between
the building and the I-30 frontage road.Two (2)access points
were approved from the frontage road.
To date,the paved parking area as shown on the approved site
plan has not been constructed and the two (2)drives from the
frontage road have not been established.Vehicles can currently
access the site anywhere along the existing gravel vehicular use
area.The approved site plan also showed a small interior
landscape island within the parking area.
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:5 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-4484-B
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant requests to revise the previously approved
PCD site plan only with respect to the vehicular use area
between the existing building and the I-30 frontage road.
The applicant notes that it is their intention to pave the
vehicular use area.However,the applicant wishes not tostripetheparkingarea,install the small landscape island
or establish interior curbing within the vehicular usearea.The applicant notes that if interior landscaping and
curbing is constructed,it will inhibit semi truck
maneuvering within the site.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There is an existing commercial building on the property,
with a gravel vehicular use area between the building andInterstate30.There is a mixture of commercial and
industrial uses to the east and west along I-30 and to the
south across I-30.There is a warehouse (Hank's Furniture)
on the property immediately to the north,with R-2 zoned
property further north.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received no comment from the
neighborhood.The Town and Country and SWLR UP
Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public
hearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
2.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
3.Easements shown for proposed storm drainage are required.
4.Driveway shall be one-way in and out only.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Entergy:No Comment.
AEUCLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment.
2
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:5 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-4484-B
Water:A development fee based on the size of connection
will apply in addition to normal charges.On-site fire
protection may be required.
Fire Department:No Comment.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
This request is located in the Geyer Springs —West
Planning District.The Land Use Plan shows Mixed
Commercial and Industrial for this property.The applicant
has applied for a revision of an existing Planned
Commercial Development for modification of the vehicular
use area.A land use plan amendment is not required.
Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan:
A Neighborhood Action Plan is under development for this
area.The Neighborhood Plan Steering Committee has been
notified of this action.
Landsca e Issues:
A small amount of landscaping is required.Landscaped
areas must be protected from vehicular traffic with
curbing.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Jerry Larkowski and Jeff Butner were present,representing
the application.Staff briefly described the revised PCD.
Staff noted that a full-size revised site plan needed to be
submitted showing the boundaries of the proposed paving.
There was a brief discussion regarding the property and the
existing conditions.Staff noted that the applicant would
need to obtain a franchise-type approval from the State,
based on the fact that a portion of the vehicular use area
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:5 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-4484-B
is in the I-30 right-of-way.The Committee suggested
deferring the application to allow the applicant time to
meet with the State Highway Department and explore the
franchise procedure.
Bob Brown,of the Planning Staff,noted that a small amount
of landscaping would be required.Staff suggested
relocating the small landscape island as was shown on the
previously approved site plan to another area of the site.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the issue to
the full Commission for resolution.
H.ANALYSIS:
As noted in paragraph G.,a portion of the vehicular use
area between the existing building and the I-30 frontage
road is located in the I-30 right-of-way.The applicant
submitted a letter to staff on May 16,2001 requesting that
this application be deferred to the July 12,2001 Planning
Commission agenda.This will allow the applicant time to
meet with the State Highway Department and discuss a
franchise-type agreement for this vehicular use area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the application be deferred to the
July 12,2001 Planning Commission agenda.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted aletteronMay16,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to
the July 12,2001 agenda.Staff supported the deferral request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
4
May 31,200~
ITEM NO.:6 FILE NO.:Z-4741-A
NAME:Wade —Short-Form POD
LOCATION:5100 "B"Street
DEVELOPER:SURVEYOR:
Nancy P.Wade Donald W.Brooks
3623 Hill Road 20620 Arch Street Pike
Little Rock,AR 72205 Hensley,AR 72065
AREA:0.20 acre NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:R-3 ALLOWED USES:Single Family Residential
PROPOSED USE:Single Family
Residential/Office
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to rezone the property at 5100 "B"
Street from R-3 to POD in order to utilize a portion of the
existing single family residence as an office for a
landscaping business.The applicant also proposes to
heavily landscape the property,which will serve as a
sample garden for the landscape business.
The applicant notes that 225 square feet of the 1,225
square foot residence will be used as an office,with the
remaining 1,000 square feet utilized as a residence for the
owner of the landscape business.The hours of operationfortheofficewillbe8:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m.,Monday-
Friday.There will be no off-site employees reporting tothissite.The applicant notes that any customer traffic
will be very low,possibly one (1)person per week on
average and no customer traffic during the winter months.
The applicant also notes that there will be no retail sales
on the site.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:2-4741-A
The proposed site plan shows a new 20 foot by 30 foot
garage to be constructed near the west property line,which
will replace a garage that once existed in this area.
There will also be a 20 foot wide concrete drive from "B"
Street to serve the garage.The applicant notes that when
the new garage and drive are constructed,the existing
gravel parking space at the southwest corner of the house
will be removed.
The proposed site plan also shows a ground-mounted sign at
the southeast corner of the property.This sign will have
a maximum height of three (3)feet and a maximum area of
five (5)square feet.The applicant notes that the only
wording on the sign will be "Arkansas Native Landscape"and
the business phone number.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There is an existing single family residence located within
the east one-half of the property.There are single family
residences to the west along "B"Street,east across Van
Buren Street and to the north.There is an office use
across "B"Street to the south,with several other
office/commercial uses scattered along Van Buren Street to
the north and south.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received several phone calls
(as a result of the posted sign)from persons requesting
information on this application.The Hillcrest
Neighborhood Association was notified of the public
hearing.
D .ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Van Buren is classified on the Master Street Plan as a
minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 35 feet
from centerline will be required.
2."B"Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a
commercial street.Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from
centerline.
3.A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is requiredatthecornerof"B"Street and Van Buren.
4.Provide design of streets conforming to "MSP"(Master
Street Plan).Construct one-half street improvements to
these streets including 5-foot sidewalks with planned
development.
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:2-4741-A
5.Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
6.Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is
damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy.7.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
8.Show parking for customers and employees.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer service for this property unknown.
Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for details.
Entergy:No Comment.
ARKLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:Please call One Call before sign
construction.
Water:No Comment.
Fire Department:No Comment.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
This request is located in the Heights/Hillcrest PlanningDistrict.The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this
property.The applicant has applied for a Planned Office
Development for a home-based business.The property is
currently zoned R-3 Single Family.A land use plan
amendment is not required as long as the primary use of the
structure remains residential,the residential character of
the structure is not altered,and the office space can be
converted back into Single Family residential uses.
Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in the area covered by theHillcrestNeighborhoodPlan:a "Blueprint"of our
community.The plan contained a goal of creating a
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-4741-A
different set of guidelines with which to govern the
development of Hillcrest.Under that goal the plan listed
two objectives relevant to this case.The objective
addressing residential goals was supported by the action
statement calling for the development of specific standards
for office usage and home occupancy businesses in
Hillcrest.The next relevant objective stated that overall
development goals should be used to direct specific policyforpreservingtheaestheticnatureoftheneighborhood.
Landsca e Issues:
No Comment.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Jamie Wayne was present,representing the application.Staff briefly described the proposed POD and asked for some
additional information on the project.Staff noted that
one of the two ground-mounted signs as shown on the
originally submitted site plan needed to be removed.In
response to a question from staff,Mr.Wayne noted that
there would be no retail sales on the property.Mr.Waynealsonotedthatcustomertrafficwouldbeveryminimal.
Mr.Wayne also noted that he may wish to construct a garage
near the west property line,where a garage existed
previously.Staff noted that the garage needed to be shown
on the site plan,and could only be used for residential
purposes.
The overall POD proposed was briefly discussed.Staff
noted that if it were not for the sign and sample garden
which would generate some customer traffic,the office
could be approved administratively as a home occupation
permit.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the POD to
the full Commission for resolution.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on May16,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as raised
by staff and the Subdivision Committee.
4
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-4741-A
One (1)of the ground-mounted signs has been removed from
the plan,leaving one (1)small ground-mounted sign at the
southeast corner of the property.This sign will have a
maximum height of three (3)feet and a maximum area of five
(5)square feet.The sign must be set back at least five
(5)feet from the property lines (after right-of-way
dedication).The applicant notes that the wording on the
sign will be "Arkansas Native Landscape"with the business
phone number.
The revised plan also shows a 20 foot by 30 foot garage to
be constructed near the west property line.This garage
will replace a structure which previously existed in this
area.There will also be a 20 foot wide driveway from "B"
Street to serve the garage.The existing gravel parking
space on the property will be removed when the new drivewayisconstructed.
The applicant notes that customer traffic will be very
minimal,possibly one (1)customer per week on average,
with no customer traffic during the winter months.The new
driveway will provide an off-street parking space for the
occasional customer.The applicant has noted that there
will be no off-site employees reporting to this site.
The applicant also notes that the additional right-of-way
will be dedicated as required by Public Works.The
applicant also agrees to a 15 percent in-lieu contribution
(percentage of construction cost for the new garage and
driveway)for the required street improvements.Public
Works agrees to the in-lieu contribution and notes that
this money may be used to install a sidewalk along "B"
Street.
The applicant has done an adequate job of addressing the
issues as raised during the staff and subdivision Committee
review of this application.With compliance with the
specific conditions as noted in paragraph I.of this
report,staff feels that the proposed POD will have no
adverse impact on the general area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the POD rezoning subject to
the following conditions:
5
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-4741-A
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D
and E of this report.
2.The POD zoning is for Arkansas Native Landscape only.If
this business vacates the property,the site will revert
entirely to single family residential use and the ground-
mounted sign must be removed.
3.There is to be no retail sales on the property.
4.A maximum of 225 square feet of the single family
residential structure may be used as an office.
5.There are to be no off-site employees reporting to thesite.
6.The maximum sign height shall be three (3)feet and the
maximum sign area shall be five (5)square feet,with
wording as described in paragraph H.of this report.The
sign is not to be lighted.
7.The new garage structure cannot be used for storage
related to the business use;only for residential
purposes.
8.There is to be no outside storage of equipment or
materials related to the landscape business.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Nancy Wade was present,representing the application.
Staff asked Chairman Rector if there were any cards from
citizens on this item.He responded that there was one (1)and
asked Paula Lingo to address the Commission.
Paula Lingo addressed the Commission and noted concern that the
rezoning would allow other businesses at this location should
the current landscape business vacate the site.Staff explained
that the POD zoning would be for Arkansas Native Landscape only,
and if this business vacates the site,the property will revert
back entirely to single family and the sign will be removed.
Commissioner Berry asked about the proposed sign.Staff
explained that it would be approximately three (3)feet in
height and 15 square feet in area,and that the sign would be on
a masonry base.Nancy Wade,property owner,explained that the
sign would be modeled after signs in the Quapaw Quarter area ofLittleRock.
6
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:2-4741-A
Commissioner Muse asked about parking on the site.Mrs.Wade
explained that a two-car driveway would be constructed when the
garage structure is constructed within the west portion of the
property.Commissioner Muse asked if a vehicle used for the
business could be parked in the garage.Staff responded that it
could.
There was a motion to approve the application as recommended bystaff.The motion passed by a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent
and 1 open position.
7
May 31,200~
ITEM NO.:7 FILE NO.:Z-5282-B
NAME:Pinnacle Bank —Revised PD-0
LOCATION:Northeast corner of Rodney Parham and North Rodney
Parham Roads
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Pinnacle Bank The Wilcox Group
2610 Cantrell Road 2222 Cottondale Lane,¹100
Little Rock,AR 72202 Little Rock,AR 72202
AREA:0.88 acre NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:PD-0 ALLOWED USES:Branch Bank
PROPOSED USE:Branch Bank
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
BACKGROUND:
On July 20,1999,the Board of Directors passed Ordinance No.
18,061 which rezoned this property from R-2 to PD-0 for the
development of a branch bank.The approved site plan included a
3,580 square foot (two-story)bank building located within the
south one-half of the property,with drive-thru teller lanes on
the west side of the building and an ATM machine on the north
side.There is a parking area within the northern portion of
the property,with two (2)access points from North Rodney
Parham Road.
The approved PD-0 development plan allowed for a ground-mounted
sign which was to conform to City Ordinance as it relates toofficezonedproperty.The sign may have a maximum height of
six (6)feet and a maximum area of 64 square feet.
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:7 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5282-B
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to revise the previously approved
PD-0 only with respect to the size of the ground-mounted
sign near the southeast corner of the property.The
applicant is proposing a pylon sign with a maximum heightof25feetandamaximumareaof94squarefeet.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The Pinnacle Bank development is currently underconstruction.
There is an office building and a commercial buildinglocatedadjacenttothispropertytotheeast,with single-
family residences immediately north.A new office building
(Cypress Plaza)is located across North Rodney Parham Roadtothewest,with a small commercial strip center to the
south across Rodney Parham Road.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received one (1)phone call
from a person expressing concern with the proposed signsize.The Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Association wasnotifiedofthepublichearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
No Comments.
E.UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
No Comments.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
This request is located in the Rodney Parham PlanningDistrict.The Land Use Plan shows Office for this
property.The applicant has applied for a revision of an
existing Planned Development —Office for a different sign.
A land use plan amendment is not required.
2
May 31,200&
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:7 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5282-B
Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the
River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan.The plan
contained an Infrastructure Goal that called for the
development of an adequate infrastructure network,
including sidewalks,roadways,and drainage systems,within
the neighborhood which is designed and works to produce a
safe and attractive neighborhood environment.
Landsca e Issues:
No Comments.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Frank Withrow,Jr.was present,representing the
application.Staff reviewed the previously approved and
proposed sign sizes with the Committees.
Mr.Withrow discussed with the Committee the need for the
larger ground-mounted sign.It was noted that the larger
size was proposed for a greater degree of visibility.
Staff noted that wall-mounted signage would also be allowed
under the approved PD-0 Plan.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the revised
PD-0 to the full Commission for resolution.
H .ANALYSIS:
As noted in paragraph A.,the applicant proposes to revise
the previously approved PD-0 site plan for this property
only with respect to ground-mounted sign size.The maximum
ground-mounted sign size allowed with the approved PD-0
includes a maximum height of six (6)feet and a maximum
area of 64 square feet.These are the maximum allowed
dimensions for ground-mounted signage in office zones.
The applicant proposes a ground-mounted pylon sign hear the
southeast corner of the property with increased dimensions
as follows:
maximum height —25 feet
maximum area —94 square
3
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:7 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5282-B
The applicant is requesting the larger sign for increased
visibility,primarily from the east.
Staff feels that given the small size of the proposed
branch bank development (0.88 acre)with only 110+feet ofstreetfrontagealongRodneyParhamRoad,the amount,of
signage allowed with the approved PD-0 development plan
should be sufficient to serve this property.This would
include a ground-mounted sign with a maximum height of six
(6)feet and maximum area of 64 square feet,as well as
wall-mounted signage on the south and west building fronts
up to 10 percent of the building facade area.Therefore,staff cannot support the revised ground-mounted sign
dimensions as proposed.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends denial of the revised PD-O.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted aletteronMay25,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to
the July 12,2001 agenda.Staff supported the deferral request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed byavoteof7ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
4
May 31,200~
ITEM NO.:8 FILE NO.:Z-7025
NAME:West Park Office Centre —Long-Form PCD
LOCATION:Northeast corner of Bowman and Kanis Roads
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Davis Properties Richburg/Rickett Consulting Engineers
P.O.Box 241025 ¹1 Seven Acres Dr.
Little Rock,AR 72223 Little Rock,AR 72223
AREA:6.992 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:R-2 ALLOWED USES:Single Family Residential
PROPOSED USE:Office/Commercial
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
A.PROPOSAL/REQUE ST:
The applicant proposes to rezone the 6.99 acre property at
the northeast corner of Bowman and Kanis Roads from R-2 to
PCD for a Mixed Office/Commercial development.The
proposed site plan shows a total of eight (8)buildings
with proposed uses as follows:
Buildings A-D —60%commercial (C-3 permitted uses)
40%general/professional office
Building E —general/professional office
Buildings F-H —office/office-warehouse,with a
maximum of 70%warehouse space
The proposed development will have approximately 28,830
square feet of commercial space,45,830 square feet of
office space and 25,410 square feet of warehouse space.
The proposed hours of operation will be 6:00 a.m.—9:30
p.m.,Monday-Saturday.
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7025
The applicant proposes a total of 233 parking spaces to
serve the development.Two (2)access points are proposed,
one (1)driveway from Kanis Road and one (1)driveway from
Bowman Road.
The proposed site plan shows a monument-type ground-mounted
sign near the southwest corner of the property.The
applicant notes that the sign will have a maximum height of
eight (8)feet and a maximum area of 160 square feet.
The applicant notes that the project will be developed in
two (2)phases.Phase I will include Buildings A-C,
associated parking areas and a single access point from
Bowman Road.The Bowman Road improvements and a portion of
the Kanis Road improvements will be made during Phase I
construction.The applicant notes that the remainder of
the site will remain undisturbed until Phase II
construction takes place.
The applicant has also provided proposed building
elevations (see attached),with the following description
of the exterior building construction:
"The project will consist of eight buildings
that are veneered with a combination of four-
inch split-face concrete block,brick and an
exterior insulated finish system (eifs).The
bottom three feet will be the split-face block
base with the next seventeen feet to be brick
veneer that will be articulated with some
banded reveals and medallions above each
window.The faqade will then be capped with aneifscornicethatisfourfeethightocreatea
building height of twenty-four feet.
The entries to each building/tenant will be
either a ten-foot or six-foot wide entry with
an eifs surround.Each surround will project
from the face of the building one-foot and
articulate each entry as well as provide cover.
The rear face of each building will be a pre-
finished metal panel on the service side with
six foot wide double doors as required by each
tenant."
Please see the attached site plan for the proposed building
and parking locations along with the other proposed
improvements.The site plan also shows the proposed phase
line as noted earlier.
2
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7025
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The property is currently undeveloped and wooded.TherearecommercialusesandzoningacrossKanisRoadtothe
south and southwest.There is a plant nursery across
Bowman Road to the west.There is a plumbing contractor's
business and office use immediately east.There is a
commercial development to the north along the east side of
Bowman Road,with the Wal-Mart/Sam's development across
Bowman Road to the northwest.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS
As of this writing,staff has received several phone calls
(as a result of the posted sign).from persons requesting
information on this application.The John Barrow and
Gibraltar Heights/Point West/Timber Ridge Neighborhood
Associations were notified of the public hearing.
D .ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Kanis Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a
minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 55 feet
from centerline will be required for the first 275 feet,
45 feet for all remaining parts.
2.Bowman Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a
minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet
from centerline will be required.(Verify location of
existing centerline)
3.A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required
at the corner of Bowman and Kanis Roads.
4.Provide design of streets conforming to "MSP"(Master
Street Plan).Construct one-half street improvements to
these streets including 5-foot sidewalks with planned
development.
5.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
6.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
7.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
8.Easements shown for proposed storm drainage are required.
3
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7025
E.UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer main extension required with easements to
serve property.
Entergy:Ten (10)foot easements are requested along the
east property line and interior.Contact utility for details.
AKKA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:Developer will have to consider conduit
for SWBT access from right-of-way to buildings.Contact
utility for details.
Water:A development fee based on the size of connection
will apply in addition to normal charges.On-site fire
protection may be required.If water facilities need to be
adjusted and/or relocated,contact the Water Works.That
work would be done at the expense of the developer.
Fire Department:Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 regarding
turning radii and placement of fire hydrants.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
This request is located in the I-430 Planning District.
The Land Use Plan shows Mixed Office and Commercial for
this property.The applicant has applied for a Planned
Commercial Development for a mixed office and commercial
development.The property is currently zoned R-2 Single
Family.A land use plan amendment is not required.
Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan:
The property under review is not located in an area covered
by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action
plan.
4
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7025
Landsca e Issues:
The proposed on-site street buffer along Kanis Road drops
below the required average width of 38 feet and below the
minimum width allowed at any given point of 19 feet.The
proposed on-site street buffer along Bowman Road drops
below the required average width of 27 feet and below the
minimum width allowed at any given point of 13 w feet.The
proposed land use buffer along the eastern perimeter must
not drop below the minimum width allowed at any given point
of 9 feet in the proposed area of the dumpsters.
A 6-foot high opaque screen,either a wooden fence with its
face side directed outward or dense evergreen plantings is
required along the eastern perimeter.
Interior landscape islands must be at least 150 square feet
in area.
An irrigation system to water landscaped areas is required.
Prior to receiving a building permit,it will be necessary
that the landscape plan be stamped with the seal of a
Registered Landscape Architect.
Since this is a tree-covered site,the City Beautiful
Commission recommends preserving as many trees as feasible.
Extra credit can given toward compliance with the Landscape
Ordinance,when preserving trees of 6-inch caliper or
larger.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(May 10,2001)
Max Davis,Barry Williams and Wes Garrett were present,
representing the application.Staff briefly described the
proposed PCD,noting that some additional project
information was needed.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed.
Public Works noted that the driveway locations as proposed
would be acceptable.The proposed phasing plan for the
development (including street improvements)was briefly
discussed.
5
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7025
The retaining wall along the north property line was
briefly discussed.Mr.Williams noted that the maximum
height of the wall will be approximately ten (10)feet at
the highest point.
The landscape requirements were briefly discussed.
Mr.Williams noted that the site plan would conform to the
current landscape and buffer requirements.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the PCD to
the full Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on May
16,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as raised
by staff and the Subdivision Committee.The revised plan
provides building heights,sign details and the proposed
phase line.
Staff reviewed the revised site plan with respect to
landscape and buffer requirements.The revised site plan
conforms to the current landscape and buffer ordinances.
As noted in paragraph G.,the retaining wall along the
north property line will have a maximum height,of
approximately 10 feet.Therefore,the retaining wall will
also conform to ordinance standards.
A total of 233 parking spaces is proposed to serve the
office/commercial development.The typical minimum number
of parking spaces for this development would be 260 spaces.
Staff supports the parking plan as proposed.
Public Works has also reviewed the revised site plan and
notes that there are no unresolved issues.The required
right-of-way and street improvements for Bowman and Kanis
Roads will be provided.
Staff feels that the applicant has done an above average
job in addressing the issues as raised by staff during the
review of this project.The 6.99 acre property is shown as
Mixed Office and Commercial on the City's Land Use Plan.
The mixed use development as proposed should have no
adverse impact on the general area.
6
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7025
I.STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the PCD rezoning subject to
the following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D,E and F of this report.
2.Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away
from adjacent property.3.The dumpster area must be screened on three (3)sides
with an eight (8)foot high opaque fence or wall.
4.The proposed monument-type ground-mounted sign will
have a maximum height of eight (8)feet and a maximum
area of 160 square feet for the entire sign structure.
5.Phase II as shown on the proposed site plan must remain
undisturbed until Phase II construction takes place.6.The uses for the proposed buildings will be restricted
as noted in paragraph A.of this report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
7
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:9 FILE NO.:S-1309
NAME:Landers —Subdivision Site Plan Review
LOCATION:3201 West 65 Street
DEVELOPER:SURVEYOR:
Lance Landers White-Daters and Associates
3201 West 65 Street 24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock,AR 72202 Little Rock,AR 72223
AREA:7.09 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:I-2 ALLOWED USES:Industrial
PROPOSED USE:Industrial
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
BACKGROUND:
There is an existing office/warehouse building on the site which
has approximately 90,000 square feet of floor area.There are
areas of parking for large trucks and private passenger vehicles
along the north,south and east sides of the building,with a
service drive along the building's west side.The building is
zoned I-2 and currently occupied by Southern Marine PWC,Inc.
and Twin City Truck Company.The applicant proposes to
construct a small office building near the northeast corner of
the property.Therefore,a multiple building site plan is
required to be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to construct a 2,318 square foot
building near the northeast corner of the property within
an existing concrete/asphalt area.The building will be
used for additional office space and be approximately 16
feet in height.The proposed site plan shows five (5)
striped parking spaces on the north side of the new
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:9 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1309
building,which satisfies the minimum ordinance requirement
for parking.
Please see the attached site plan for existing and proposed
building and parking locations.The applicant notes that
the new office building's exterior will match the existing
building.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
As noted earlier,there is an existing industrial building
on the property,with vehicular use area on the building's
north,south and east sides.This general area along West
65 Street contains a mixture of office,commercial and
industrial uses.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
The Wakefield,Upper Baseline and SWLR UP Neighborhood
Associations were notified of the public hearing.As of
this writing,staff has received a phone call from the
Upper Baseline Neighborhood Association expressing no
concerns with the proposed site plan.
D .ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
6.Repair or replace any curb and gutter that is damaged
in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy.
7.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted
for approval prior to start of work.
8.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this
property.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Entergy:No Comment.
ARKLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment.
Water:Contact the Water Works if additional water service
is required.
Fire Department:No Comment.
2
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:9 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1309
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is located on bus route 15.If the
project is approved CATA has concerns about construction
affecting the bus travel time and would like to be
notified when construction will start.However,the
actual project use has no effect on bus radius,turnout
and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
A small amount of building landscaping in the area of the
proposed building will be required.Generally,this would
be a 3-foot wide landscaped area between the public parking
area and proposed structure.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Ray Wilson was present,representing the application.
Staff briefly described the proposed site plan.Staff
noted that a minimum of five (5)striped parking spaces
needed to be provided for the new office building.
Bob Brown,of the Planning Staff,noted that a small amount
of building landscaping needed to be provided between the
striped parking spaces and the new building.Mr.Wilson
indicated that the site plan would be revised accordingly.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the site plan
to the full Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on
May 15,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as
raised by staff at the Subdivision Committee meeting.
The revised plan shows five (5)striped parking spaces
along the north side of the proposed new 2,318 square foot
office building.This meets the minimum ordinance
3
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:9 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1309
requirement for parking for the new building.The revised
plan also shows a three (3)foot wide landscape strip
between the striped parking and the new building as
required.
The proposed new office building conforms to the minimum
setback and height requirements as set forth by the City'
Zoning Ordinance.Therefore,there should be no
outstanding issues associated with the proposed site plan.
The proposed plan should have no adverse impact on the
general area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to
compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D,
E and F of this report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
4
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:10 FILE NO.:S-1311
NAME:Freeway Business Park (Lot 1)—Subdivision Site Plan Review
LOCATION:Northeast corner of West 12 Street and Rodney
Parham Road
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
R.J.Properties,LLC Convenience Design,Inc.
22461 I-30,Suite 1000 P.O.Box 164070
Bryant,AR 72022 Little Rock,AR 72216
AREA:2.11 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:C-3 ALLOWED USES:Commercial
PROPOSED USE:Convenience store with
gas pumps
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
A variance for reduced driveway spacing for two (2)drives along
Freeway Drive.
BACKGROUND:
The property at the northeast corner of West 12 Street and
Rodney Parham Road is zoned C-3.The applicant wishes to
develop a convenience store with gas pumps and a fast foodrestaurantonthispropertywhichisapermittedusewithin
C-3 zoning.However,based on the fact that the applicant is
proposing two (2)buildings on the property,the site plan must
be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to develop a convenience store with
gas pumps and a fast food restaurant at the northeast
corner of West 12 Street and Rodney Parham Road.The
development will include two (2)structures,a 4,099 square
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:10 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1311
foot convenience store building (21 feet in height)and a
separate canopy structure (18 feet in height)which will
cover five (5)gas pumps.A row of parking spaces is
proposed between the convenience store building and the gas
pumps,with a drive-thru window on the north side of the
building for the fast food restaurant.
Three (3)access points are proposed for the development,
two (2)from Freeway Drive and one (1)from West 12Street.The applicant is requesting a variance for reduced
spacing for the two (2)drives along Freeway Drive.
The proposed site plan also shows two (2)ground-mounted
sign locations,one at the corner of Rodney Parham Road and
West 12 Street and one at the corner of Rodney Parham Road
and Freeway Drive.The applicant notes that these signs
will have an approximate height of 34 feet and an area of
approximately 75 square feet.
The applicant also notes that the site lighting will be
low-level and directional and will not reflect onto
adjacent property.Please see the attached site plan for
the proposed building,parking and drive locations.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The property is undeveloped and grass-covered.Some site
work has begun on the property.
There is a mixture of commercial and industrial uses across
West 12 Street to the south and across Rodney Parham Road
to the west.There is a cemetery immediately east of this
property.The remaining lots within the Freeway Business
Park are located immediately north and northwest (office
and mini-warehouse uses),with Interstate 630 further
north.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received no comments from the
neighborhood.The University Park,John Barrow and
Briarwood Neighborhood Associations were notified of the
public hearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Easements shown for proposed storm drainage are
required.
2.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:10 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1311
are required.
3.Sidewalks shall be shown conforming to Sec.31-175 and
the "MSP".
4.Driveways shall conform to Sec.31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.
5.Stormwater Detention per Ordinance 14,787 and the
"Drainage Manual"is required.
6.Prepare letter for streetlights as required by Sec.
31-403.
7.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
8 .A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec.29-186(e)is
required.
9.A Grading Permit per Secs.29-186(c)and (d)is
required.
10.Construct a right-turn-lane on 12 Street for efficient
movement of traffic.
11.Make the driveway on 12 Street right-in-right-out only
by constructing a triangular island.
12.Current ordinance does not allow two driveways on the
north side of the property.Close driveway closer to
the northwest corner of the property or request a
variance.
E ~UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Entergy:No Comment.
2QQKA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:The developer will have to pay for the
relocation of Southwestern Bell facilities from the
existing right-of-way north of West 12 Street.Contact
utility for
details'ater:
If water facilities need to be adjusted and/or
relocated,contact the Water Works.That work would be
done at the expense of the developer.
Fire Department:Place fire hydrants per City Code.Contact
Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:10 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1311
CATA:Project site is located on bus route ¹3,but has no
effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
A 6-foot high opaque screen,either a wooden fence with its
face side directed outward or dense evergreen plantings is
required along the eastern perimeter.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Ron Madding was present,representing the application.
Staff briefly described the proposed site plan,noting that
building height and sign locations needed to be shown on
the plan.Mr.Madding noted that site lighting would be
low-level and not reflected onto adjacent property.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed.Bob
Turner,of Public Works,noted that the department had no
problem with the driveway locations proposed and would
support a variance for reduced spacing of the two (2)
drives along Freeway Drive.
The utility comments were briefly discussed.Staff
informed the applicant to contact individual utility
companies with questions or comments.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the site plan
to the full Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on
May 15,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as
raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee.The revised
plan shows building heights and sign locations as
requested.
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:10 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1311
The proposed development will require a minimum of 17
parking spaces.The proposed site plan shows 9 striped
spaces between the convenience store building and the
canopy structure.There are also 10 parking spaces at the
gas pumps.Therefore,the site plan conforms to the
parking requirements.
As noted in paragraph A.,the applicant is requesting a
variance to allow reduced spacing for the two (2)proposed
driveways from Freeway Drive.The applicant notes that the
two (2)drives are needed to assure safe access and
maneuvering for fuel transport trucks.The minimum
required spacing for the two (2)drives is 250 feet.The
proposed spacing is 140 feet.Public Works feels that the
variance is reasonable and supports the variance as
requested.
Otherwise,there should be no outstanding issues associated
with the proposed site plan.The buildings as proposed
conform to the ordinance requirements for C-3 zoning.
Staff feels that the proposed development will have no
adverse impact on the general area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to the
following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D,E and F of this report.
2.Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away
from adjacent property.
3.Signage must conform to the Zoning Ordinance requirements
for C-3 zoned property.
4.Staff supports the variance to allow reduced spacing for
the two (2)drives along Freeway Drive.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
5
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:10 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1311
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
6
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:11 FILE NO.:S-1312
NAME:Markham Center Square —Subdivision Site Plan Review
LOCATION:9101 West Markham Street
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Weingarten Realty Investors Bartlett and West Engineers
2600 Citadel Plaza Dr.1701 Centerview Dr.,Ste.210
Houston,TX 77008 Little Rock,AR 72211-4312
AREA:14.32 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:C-3 ALLOWED USES:Commercial
PROPOSED USE:Commercial
VARIANCE S/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
A variance to allow a reduced number of parking spaces for the
entire commercial site.
BACKGROUND:
The property at 9101 West Markham Street is zoned C-3 and
contains a large commercial building and a small restaurant
building.Based on the fact that the applicant is proposing a
third commercial building for the property,Planning Commission
review is required.
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to construct a 4,000 square foot
commercial building (20 feet in height)on the north side
of the existing shopping center building,between the
building and West Markham Street.The property is zoned C-
3 and the new building will be utilized for retail uses.
The proposed new building will be constructed in an area of
existing paved parking.The parking on the north and south
sides of the proposed building will be the result of re-
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:11 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1312
striping existing paved area.
The entire site will have a total of 574 parking spaces.
The minimum ordinance parking requirement for a shoppingcenterofthissizewouldbe582spaces.Therefore,the
applicant is requesting a variance for a reduced number of
parking spaces (8 spaces short).No new parking is
proposed for this site.
The applicant notes that there will be no additional
ground-mounted signage for the proposed new commercial
building.The applicant also notes that the landscaping
along West Markham Street will be preserved,including the
existing large oak tree.As noted on the attached site
plan,one (1)of the existing driveways along West Markham
Street will be closed and replaced with landscaping.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There is an existing commercial strip center building and a
small restaurant building on the property.The area where
the new proposed commercial building is to be located is
currently paved parking area.
There are single family residences to the west along West
Markham Street and to the north across West Markham.ThereisaservicestationatthesouthwestcornerofWest
Markham Street and Barrow Road,with a mixture of office
and commercial uses further east across Barrow Road.Thereisa100footwidedrainageeasementalongthisproperty's
south boundary,with single family residences on the south
side of the easement.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received one (1)phone call
from a person requesting information on this application.
The Pennbrook/Clover Hill Place and Santa Fe Heights
Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public
hearing.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Markham Street is classified on the Master Street Plan
as a minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 35
feet from centerline will be required.
2.John Barrow Road is classified on the Master Street Plan
as a minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 45
2
May 31,200~
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:11 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1312
feet from centerline will be required.3.Driveways shall conform to Sec.31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.Close driveway that does not meet Ordinance.
Indicate which driveway will be closed.
4.Maximum driveway width is 36 feet.Reconstruct and
reestablish curb and gutter on any that are wider than
36 feet.
5.Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
6.Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that
is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to
occupancy.
7.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
8.Easements shown for proposed storm drainage are
required.
9.A sketch grading and drainage plan,a special flood
hazard permit,and a special grading permit for flood
hazard areas are required.ADEQ and NPDES permit is
also required.
10.A grading permit and development permit for special
flood hazard area is required prior to construction.
11.The minimum Finish Floor elevation of 337 feet (msl)is
required to be shown on plat and grading plans.
12.Ingress and egress on Markham is difficult.If developer
agrees to widen Markham an additional 6 feet,City of
Little Rock would do necessary striping to create left-
turn lane to this facility.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Entergy:No Comment.
ARKLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment.
Water:IS ACREAGE CHARGE PD????Contact the Water Works
regarding meter size and location.
Fire Department:No Comment.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:11 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1312
CATA:Project site is located on bus route ¹5.Proposed
building has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route,
however,CATA supports the sidewalk accessibility
improvements.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
A small amount of landscaping between the proposed building
and public parking area is required.Generally,this
landscape strip would be three feet in width some
flexibility with this requirement is allowed.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Thomas Graham was present,representing the application.
Staff briefly described the proposed site plan and noted
that some additional project information was needed.
The Public Works requirements were discussed.It was noted
that with the dedication of right-of-way for Barrow Road,
the applicant could apply for a franchise permit to
continue to use the parking along the Barrow Road frontage.
The driveway locations were discussed.Public Works noted
that one (1)of the existing driveways along West Markham
Street needed to be closed to provide better spacing.
Public Works also noted that the widest drive along Barrow
Road needed to be reduced in width.Mr.Graham indicated
that the issues would be taken care of.
Public Works also suggested widening West Markham Street
(by the developer)and creating a left turn lane into this
property.It was noted that this was not a requirement,
only a suggestion.Mr.Graham indicated that the developer
would not be able financially to do the construction,plusitwouldeliminatealargeamountofthelandscapingalong
West Markham Street.
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:11 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1312
The landscape requirements were briefly discussed.It was
noted that a small amount of building landscaping would be
required.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the site plan
to the full Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on May
16,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as raised
by staff and the Subdivision Committee.The proposed
building height has been noted on the site plan.
The revised plan also shows that one (1)of the existing
driveways along West Markham Street will be removed and the
widest drive along Barrow Road will be reduced in width.
The area where the existing drive along West Markham Street
will be removed will be replaced with landscaping.This
will satisfy the building landscaping requirement.
The applicant has also noted that the required right-of-way
will be dedicated.The extra 10 feet of right-of-way
dedication along Barrow Road will be into the existing
parking for the restaurant which is along this street.The
applicant will request a franchise permit to continue the
use of this parking.Public Works has indicated support of
a franchise agreement.Otherwise,there should be no other
Public Works issues.
As noted in paragraph A.,the applicant is requesting a
variance for a reduced number of parking spaces for the
overall development.The minimum parking requirement for
this site would be 582 spaces.The proposed site plan has
a total of 574 spaces.The Subdivision Committee
encouraged the applicant to request a variance for reduced
parking and not add any new parking.Staff supports the
variance as requested,as there is adequate existing
parking on the site to serve the shopping center use.
Otherwise,to staff's knowledge,there are no outstanding
issues associated with this application.The proposed
commercial building conforms to ordinance standards for
setbacks and height,and should have no adverse impact on
the general area.
5
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:11 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1312
I.STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to the
following conditions:
1.Compliance with this requirement as noted in paragraphs
D,E and F of this report.
2.Staff supports the variance for reduced number of
parking spaces as requested.
3.Any additional site lighting must be low-level and
directed away from adjacent property.
4.The dumpster area must be screened on three (3)sides
with an eight (8)foot high opaque fence or wall.
5.Any signage must conform to the City'Zoning Ordinance
for commercial zoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Thomas Graham was present,representing the application.There
were three (3)persons present in opposition to the application.
Staff briefly described the proposed site plan with a
recommendation of approval with conditions.Staff informed the
Commission that a bylaw waiver was in order based on the fact
that the applicant mailed the wrong notice form to surrounding
property owners.Staff noted that the applicant mailed the
correct notice form approximately six (6)days prior to the
meeting.There was a motion to waive the bylaws.The motion
passed by a vote of 6 ayes,0 nays,4 absent and 1 open
position.
Thomas Graham addressed the Commission in support of the
application.He noted that one (1)of the existing driveways
along West Markham Street would be closed and that the 55-foot
wide drive along Barrow Road would be reduced to 36 feet.He
noted that approximately 1,500 square feet of the proposed 4,000
square foot commercial building would be used as a restaurant.
He briefly explained the requested parking variance.
Mollie Irvin,president of the Pennbrook/Cloverhill Neighborhood
Association,noted she was opposed to the proposed new
commercial building.She stated that there is another
commercial building across Bowman Road from this development
which is currently vacant.She expressed other concerns with
the commercial property,including drainage and closing the
6
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:11 (Cont.)FILE NO.:S-1312
driveway from West Markham Street.Vice-Chairman Rector asked
about closing the driveway along West Markham Street.Tad
Borkowski,of Public Works,noted that his department requested
that the applicant close one (1)of the existing driveways along
West Markham Street to improve traffic circulation and access.
Christine Patterson also addressed the Commission with concerns.
She expressed concern with the increased traffic that would be
generated by the new commercial building.She stated opposition
to any new commercial uses in the area.
Vice-Chairman Rector asked staff about the neighborhood plan for
this area.Brian Minyard,of the Planning Staff,noted that in
the neighborhood plan commercial was limited to the existing
commercial uses in the area.He noted that the plan opposed
converting residential property to commercial.The plan also
encouraged occupying vacant commercial buildings in the area.
Virginia Bland also spoke in opposition.She expressed concern
with additional commercial building space being across West
Markham Street from her property.
Commissioner Muse asked about the vacant commercial building
across Barrow Road to the east.Mr.Graham noted that the site
in question was located in the floodway and could not be used
for anything.He noted that the floodway maps were in the
process of being revised to remove the property from the
floodway.
Mr.Graham noted that the new commercial building was an attempt
to attract new smaller retail shops to the area.He noted that
the new commercial building would be finished to look like the
existing commercial shopping center.
Commissioner Rahman expressed concern with there being
additional commercial building area in this vicinity.
There was a motion to approve the site plan subject to the
conditions as noted by staff.The motion failed by a vote of
2 ayes,4 nays,4 absent and 1 open position.The application
was denied.
7
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:12 FILE NO.:Z-7023
NAME:The Ranch (Lot B-5)—Zoning Site Plan Review
LOCATION:North side of Cantrell Road,approximately 600 feet
east of Ranch Boulevard
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Ranch Properties,Inc.White-Daters and Associates
900 S.Shackleford Rd.,24 Rahling Circle
Suite 300 Little Rock,AR 72223
Little Rock,AR 72211
AREA:9.51 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:C-2 ALLOWED USES:Commercial
PROPOSED USE:Office
STAFF NOTE:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on May 16,2001
requesting that this application be deferred to the July 12,
2001 Planning Commission agenda.Staff supports the deferral as
requested.
PLAYTHING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted a
letter on May 16,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to
the July 12,2001 agenda.Staff supported the deferral request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:13 FILE NO.:Z-7024
NAME:Chenal Valley (Tract 6A)—Zoning Site Plan Review
LOCATION:Northwest corner of Rahling Rod and Chenal Valley Drive
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Deltic Timber Corporation.Whi te-Dater s and Associates
¹7 Chenal Club Circle 24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock,AR 72223 Little Rock,AR 72223
AREA:9.82 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:0-2 ALLOWED USES:Office
PROPOSED USE:Office
STAFF NOTE:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on May 16,2001
requesting that this application be deferred to the July 12,
2001 Planning Commission agenda.Staff supports the deferral as
requested.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant submitted a
letter on May 16,2001 requesting that this item be deferred to
the July 12,2001 agenda.Staff supported the deferral request.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for deferral to the July 12,2001
agenda.A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by
a vote of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:14 FILE NO.:Z-7026
NAME:Wingate Hotel —Zoning Site Plan Review
LOCATION:West side of Shackleford Road,approximately 250 feet
south of Kanis Road
DEVELOPER:ENGINEER:
Budget Hotel Management The Mehlburger Firm
415 N.4 Street 201 S.Izard Street
Aberdeen,SD 57401 Little Rock,AR 72201
AREA:1.85 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:0
ZONING:C-2 ALLOWED USES:Commercial
PROPOSED USE:Hotel
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None requested.
BACKGROUND:
The 1.85 acre site on the west side of Shackleford Road,
approximately 250 feet south of Kanis Road is zoned C-2,whichisasiteplanreviewdistrict.Any proposed development ofthispropertyrequiresasiteplanreviewbythePlanning
Commission.
A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant is proposing a single building hotel
development for this property.The hotel will have a total
of 92 rooms and a total area of 80,004 square feet.The
building will be a four (4)story structure,with an
overall building height of 42 feet —2 inches.
A total of 105 parking spaces is proposed for the site,
with a drive-thru canopy structure on the building's eastside.A single access point is proposed from Shackleford
Road.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:14 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7026
There will be a fenced swimming pool area located along the
north side of the proposed hotel building.The proposedsiteplanalsoshowsaground-mounted sign at the southeast
corner of the property.The applicant notes that the signwillconformtoCityZoningOrdinancerequirementsfor
commercial zoning.
Please see the attached site plan for proposed building and
parking locations,as well as other site improvements.
B.EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The property is currently undeveloped and wooded.There is
a mixture of office and commercial uses along Shackleford
Road to the north and south,and across Shackleford Road to
the east.There is undeveloped C-2 zoned property
immediately west of this site.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
The John Barrow and Sandpiper Neighborhood Associations
were notified of the public hearing.As of this writing,staff has received no comments from the neighborhood.
D.ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.Shackleford Road is classified on the Master Street Plan
as a minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 45
feet from centerline will be required.
2.Driveways shall conform to Sec.31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.Eliminate one driveway.
3.Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
4.Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is
damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy.
5.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
6.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
7.Grading permit will be required on this development.
8.Request variance if vertical cut of more than 10 feet is
planned.
E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater:Sewer available,not adversely affected.
Capacity Contribution Analysis required,contact Little
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:14 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7026
Rock Wastewater Utility for details.
Entergy:No Comment.
AEKLA:No Comment received.
Southwestern Bell:No Comment.
Water:An acreage charge of $150 per acre applies in
addition to normal charges.On-site fire protection will
be required.Contact the Water Works regarding options for
obtaining water to this site.RPZ backflow prevention will
be required on the domestic service to this building prior
to the first outlet.
Fire Department:Place fire hydrants per code.Contact
Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details.
Count Plannin :No Comment received.
CATA:Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius,turnout and route.
F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Plannin Division:
No Comment.
Landsca e Issues:
The rear parking lot does not provide for the 8%minimum
interior landscaping requirement.To receive credit,
interior landscape islands must be at least 7 c feet in
width.
An irrigation system to water landscaped areas is required.
The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many
trees on this tree-covered site as feasible.Extra credit
toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be
given when preserving trees of six inch caliper or larger.
G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Frank Riggins was present,representing the application.
Staff briefly described the proposed site plan and noted
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:14 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7026
that building height,dumpster screening and ground-mounted
sign information needed to be shown on a revised site plan.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed.
Public Works noted that one (1)of the two (2)drives from
Shackleford Road (as shown on the originally submitted site
plan)needed to be removed.This issue was briefly
discussed.
The landscape requirements were briefly discussed.It was
noted that additional interior landscaping would be
required.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the site plan
to the full Commission for final action.
H.ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on May
16,2001.The revised plan addresses the issues as raised
by staff at the Subdivision Committee meeting.Building
height,dumpster screening,ground-mounted sign
location/details and additional interior landscaping have
been shown on the revised plan.
The proposed site plan shows a total of 105 parking spaces
to serve the hotel use.The minimum ordinance requirement
for parking is 101 spaces.Staff supports the parking plan
as proposed.
Public Works has reviewed the revised site plan and notes
no outstanding issues.The applicant has removed one (1)
of the two (2)access drives from Shackleford Road as
required by Public Works.
Otherwise,to staff's knowledge there are no outstanding
issues associated with the site plan.The proposed site
plan conforms to ordinance standards and should have no
adverse impact on the general area.
I .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to the
following conditions:
1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:14 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-7026
D,E and F of this report.
2.The proposed ground-mounted sign must conform to Zoning
Ordinance standards for commercial soning.
3.Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away
from adjacent property.
4.The dumpster area must be screened on three (3)sides
with an eight (8)foot high opaque fence or wall.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
5
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:15 FILE NO.:Z-5963-B
NAME:Brodie Creek —Long-Form PRD —Partial Revocation
LOCATION:West side of Bowman Road,approximately one (1)mile
south of Kanis Road
DEVELOPER:
Elgor,Inc.
P.O.Box 3140
Little Rock,AR 72203
AREA:695 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1,100+
ZONING:PRD ALLOWED USES:Single Family Residential
and Related Accessory Uses
PROPOSED USE:Single Family Residential
A.BACKGROUND:
On June 20,1995,the Board of Directors passed Ordinances
No.16,908 and 16,910,rezoning 695 acres from R-2/MF-
12/MF-18/0-2/0-3/C-1 to PRD establishing the conceptual
plan for "Brodie Creek —A Community of Four Neighborhoods"
and the Brodie Creek Community,East Neighborhood —Amended
Long-Form PRD (first phase of development).The approved
concept was for a "Traditional Neighborhood Development"
patterned after 18 and 19 century villages which were
designed to foster neighborliness and a sense of community.
The PRD site encompasses 695 acres,and was designed to
have four (4)distinct neighborhoods.To date,Phase I
(The East Neighborhood)has been partially developed,with
some single family residences currently under construction.
Each neighborhood was to be unique,and to be defined by a
green edge and village center.The entire PRD development
was to contain approximately 1,100 home sites,with
potential for 55,000 square feet of commercial and up to
160,000 square feet of office/service space.The approved
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:15 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5963-B
plan also included common recreational space (2 lakes,
pond,streams and pocket parks).
B.PROPOSAL:
The property owner,Elgor,Inc.,through their agent(Pocket Properties)requests that a portion of the original
PRD be officially revoked and the property revert to R-2
zoning.The portion of the original PRD proposed to be
revoked amounts to 220 acres immediately west of Phase I,as shown on the attached sketch.The property owner
proposes to revoke this area from the PRD so that a
preliminary plat for a more conventional single familyresidentialsubdivisioncanbefiledinthenearfuture on
an upcoming Planning Commission agenda.
The majority of the 220 acres proposed for revocation was
previously zoned R-2.However,there are two (2)smallareaswhichwerezonedmultifamily(MF-12 and MF-18).TheapplicantwishesfortheseareastobezonedR-2 as well.
The ordinance which staff prepares for the PRD revocation
can be tailored to include the down-zoning of these two (2)multifamily areas.
C.NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing,staff has received two (2)phone calls
from persons requesting information on the PRD revocation.
The John Barrow and Spring Valley Manor NeighborhoodAssociationswerenotifiedofthepublichearing.
D.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(MAY 10,2001)
Ron Tyne and Baker Kurrus were present,representing the
application.The PRD area proposed to be revoked was
briefly discussed.Mr.Tyne showed the Committee a
preliminary sketch of the future plat for the PRD
revocation area.This issue was briefly discussed.
After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the PRD
partial revocation to the full Commission for resolution.
E .STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the PRD be partially revoked;that
Ordinance No.16,908 be amended and that the 220 acres of
property be zoned R-2 Single Family Residential District.
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:15 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-5963-B
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application,as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff.
A motion to that effect was made.The motion passed by a vote
of 7 ayes,0 nays,3 absent and 1 open position.
3
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:16
ew —'ity of Little Rock Department of
Parks and Recreation
geest:Planning Commission review,
comments and approval of the
recently completed Parks System
Master Plan.
Little Rock Parks and Recreation is submitting the recently
completed Parks System Master Plan for review,comments and
approval.The Parks System Master Plan is to be utilized in
conjunction with the Park and Recreation Zoning District.
Background:
The last Parks System Master Plan preparation was conducted in
1983.In late December 1999,Little Rock Parks and Recreation
received Board of Directors'pproval to update the Parks
Systems Master Plan.Staff hired Wallace,Roberts and Todd,LLC
as the lead consultant to prepare the plan along with three
other specialized firms.
Simultaneously,Vision Little Rock was kicked off with a
requirement from the Board of Directors to coordinate master
plan preparation with the Vision Little Rock process.As a
result,the consultants were teamed,not only with Parks and
Recreation staff,but also the 45 member Parks and Recreation
Work Group of Vision Little Rock.The team planning process
began in January 2000.
Four public meetings were held to solicit citizen input and
develop a citizen-driven plan.This information was coupled
with existing conditions,problems and needs,and research of
future trends in the industry and parks has a mechanism to
address issues in developing cities.A vision was created and
supporting goals established.This led to the policy framework
and action statements that will guide Little Rock Parks and
Recreation for the next ten to twenty years.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of the Parks System Master Plan.
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:16 (Cont.)
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Mark Webre was present,representing the Department of Parks and
Recreation.Mr.Webb introduced the Master Plan and gave a
brief history of the process that lead to the creation of the
new Plan.
Commissioner Adcock asked if an effort would be made to maintain
the City's existing Parks.Mr.Webre responded that plans were
to upgrade 5 parks per year.He stated the Parks Department
would work with each neighborhood prior to finalizing plans for
the upgrading of each park.
Commissioner Berry asked if the Plan included a map that showed
future park sites.Mr.Webre responded that the strategy was to
have a park within 8 blocks of every residence.He stated the
Plan did include a map that showed areas that are currently
underserved.
Commissioner Berry asked if there was a plan to acquire new park
space in areas yet to be developed.He commented that it would
be a good plan to acquire and preserve undisturbed open space.
Mr.Webre responded that the Parks Department had an aggressive
acquisition program and was asking the Board of Directors to
dedicate $1,000,000.00 per year to that program.He stated the
Parks Department was also looking at the feasibility of a park
dedication fee to be associated with new subdivision
development.Commissioner Berry commented that the State
Enabling Act did allow cities to require the dedication of
parkland.
In response to a question from Commissioner Berry,Mr.Webre
responded that there was no mention of recreation and
conservation districts in the new Plan.
Commissioner Berry noted that under the current Parks Plan,the
City was faced with the choice of acquiring property designated
as Parks by the Plan each time there was a land use issue on
such a site.He asked if the new Plan had such a requirement.
Mr.Webre responded that it did not.He reiterated that the
City Parks Department would still pursue an aggressive
acquisition policy.Jim Lawson,Director of Planning and
Development,interjected that there were advantages to the "old"
process in that sites were readily identified as potential parksites.
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:16 (Cont.)
Ruth Bell,of the League of Women Voters,stated it would be
helpful to know where private recreation uses are located and
how they fit in the new Plan.Mr.Webre responded that his
department did track those private uses.He stated the
recreation division of the Parks Department was locating,
contacting and meeting with the owners of those private uses.
Mr.Webre emphasized that the partnership between the City and
those private recreation uses was necessary.
Several commissioners complimented Mr.Webre'Department on the
creation of the new Plan.
A motion was then made to approve the proposed new Master Parks
Plan.The motion was approved by a vote of 6 ayes,0 noes and
3 absent and 1 open position.
3
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:17 FILE NO LU01 01 01 f LU01 03 01 f LU01 04 01
LU01-05-01,LU01-09-01,LU01-10-02,
LU011 1 01LU0112 01 f LU0125 01
Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —Various Planning Districts
Location:Various Parks
R~e est:Low Density Residential,Commercial,Multi-family,
Industrial,and Single Family to Park/Open Space and
Public Institutional
Source:Staff
PROPOSAL /REQUEST:
Land Use Plan amendments in the River Mountain,West Little
Rock,Heights Hillcrest,Downtown,I-630,Boyle Park,I-430,65
Street West and Port Planning Districts from Various to Park
/Open Space and Public Institutional.Park /Open Space includes
all public parks,recreation facilities,greenbelts,
floodplains,and other designated open space and recreational
land.Public Institutional includes public and quasi-public
facilities that provide a variety of services to the community
such as schools,libraries,fire stations,churches utility
substations and hospitals.
This amendment has eleven parcels which may or may not be shown
on the 1983 Park System Master Parks Plan,but are shown on the
new 2001 Little Rock Parks and Recreation Master Plan.These
areas are not shown as either Park /Open Space or Public
Institutional on the Land Use Plan.The proposed zoning on all
twelve parcels is to the new Park zoning category.
Parcel A:This is a park in the Pankey area at Piggee and Russ
Streets.It is in the River Mountain Planning District (LU01-
01-01).It is zoned R-2 Single Family and is currently shown as
Single Family on the Land Use Plan.The proposed change is to
Park~Open Space to recognize the existing park as shown on the
2001 Master Parks Plan.
Parcel B:This is open space in the Normandy Addition located
in the ravine/creek bed between Garfield and Normandy Streets.
It is in the West Little Rock Planning District (LU01-03-01).
It is zoned R2 Single Family and is shown as Single Family on
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:17 FILE NO LU01 01 01~LU01 03 01 LU01 04 01
(Cont.)LU0105 01 ~LU0109 01LU0110 02
LU01-11-01,LU01-12-01,LU01-25-01
the Land Use Plan.The proposed change is to Park /Open Space
to recognize the open space area in the drainage ravine as shown
on both the 1983 and 2001 Master Parks Plans.
Parcel C:This is open space in the Grandview Addition located
in the ravine/creek bed between East Palisades Drive and Scenic
Drive.It is in the Heights Hillcrest Planning District (LU01-
04-01).It is zoned R2 Single Family and is shown as Single
Family on the Land Use Plan.The proposed change is to Park
/Open Space to recognize the park/open space area as shown on
the park System Master Plan.As shown on both the 1983 and 2001
Master Parks Plans.
Parcel D:This is the Terry Mansion (Decorative Arts Museum)at
7 and Rock Streets.It is in the downtown Planning District
(LU01-05-01).It is zoned R4A Single Family and is shown as Low
Density Residential on the Land Use Plan.The proposed change
is to Public Institutional to recognize the museum as shown as
shown on both the 1983 and 2001 Master Parks Plans.
Parcel E:This park adjoins Stephens School to the east at,
Valentine and 17 Streets.It is in the I-630 Planning District
(LU01-09-Ola).It is zoned R2 Single Family and is shown as
Single Family on the Land Use Plan.The proposed change is to
Park /Open Space to recognize the park/playground as shown by
the park System Master Plan.As shown on both the 1983 and 2001
Master Parks Plans.
Parcel F:This is the Oak Forest Park at 14 and Hendrix
Streets.It is in the I-630 Planning District (LU01-09-01b).It is zoned R3 Single Family and is shown as Single Family on
the Land Use Plan.The proposed change is to Park /Open Space
to recognize the park as shown on both the 1983 and 2001 Master
Parks Plans.
Parcel G:This is the Jack Stephens Golf (First Tee)Park
bounded by Western Hills,43 Streets,and University Fairways.It is in the Boyle Park Planning District (LU01-10-02).It is
zoned R-2 Single Family,MF-12 Multifamily,MF-6 Multifamily,C-
3 General Commercial,I-2 Light Industrial and is currently
shown as Low Density Residential on the Land Use Plan.The
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:17 FILE NO.:LU01-01-01,LU01-03-01,LU01-04-01,
(Cont.)LU01 05 01 ~LU01 09 01 ~LU01 10 02
LU01-11-01,LU01-12-01,LU01-25-01
proposed change is to Park/Open Space to recognize the golf
course as shown the 2001 Master Parks Plan.
Parcel H:This is the Birchwood Park at Creek Circle in the
Birchwood neighborhood.It is in the I-430 Planning District
(LU01-11-01).It is zoned R2 Single Family and is shown as
Single Family and Commercial on the Land Use Plan.The proposed
change is to Park /Open Space to recognize the park as shown on
both the 1983 and 2001 Master Parks Plans.
Parcel I:This is the Jack Stephens Golf (First Tee)park at
University and north of 54 "Streets.It is in the 65 "Street
West Planning District (LU01-12-01).It is zoned C-4 Open
Display and is currently shown as Single Family and Commercial
on the Land Use Plan.The proposed change is to Park/Open Space
to recognize the golf course as shown the 2001 Master Parks
Plan.
Parcel J:This is the Fletcher Cemetery at the north end of
Longstreet.It is in the Port Planning District (LU01-25-01a).It is zoned R-2 Single Family and is currently shown as Single
Family and Park/Open Space on the Land Use Plan.The proposed
change is to Park/Open Space to recognize the cemetery as shown
on the 2001 Master Parks Plan.
Parcel K:This is Richlane Park at Heather and Richlane
Streets.It is in the Port Planning District (LU01-25-01b).It
is zoned R-2 Single Family and is currently shown as Single
Family,Industrial and Park/Open Space on the Land Use Plan.
The proposed change is to Park/Open Space to recognize the
existing park as shown on 2001 Master Parks Plan.
PARKS:
These are existing parks and open spaces,as well as a museum,
that are shown on either the 1983 Park System Master Plan and or
the 2001 Little Rock Parks and Recreation Master Plan but are
not reflected on the Future Land Use Plan.
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:17 FILE NO.:LU01-01-01,LU01-03-01,LU01-04-01,
(Cont.)LU010501gLU010901gLU0110 02
LU01-11-01,LU01-12-01,LU01-25-01
CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN:
A.)The River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan covers the
Pankey area where the park at Piggee and Russ Streets is located
and includes an action statement calling for the expansion of
the park with the addition of new passive facilities.
D.)The Terry Mansion (Decorative Arts Museum)is located in an
area covered by the Downtown Neighborhoods Plan for the Future
that did not contain a goal applicable to this change.
E.)The Stephens Park,located in an area covered by the
Stephens Neighborhood Action Plan,stated goals for improving
area parks,but did not mention this park specifically.
F.)Although the Oak Forest Neighborhood Action Plan did not
specifically mention Oak Forest Park,it did provide a statement
that safe recreational programs and facilities should be
provided for all residents.
G and I.)Most of the Jack Stephens Golf (First Tee)park
bounded by Western Hills,43 Streets,and University Fairways
lies in the area covered by the Westwood section of the Pecan
Lake,Westwood,Stagecoach-Dodd Neighborhood Action Plan while
the remainder of the area lies in an area where a Neighborhood
Plan is currently under development.The Westwood section of
the Pecan Lake,Westwood,Stagecoach-Dodd Neighborhood Action
Plan contains a Zoning and Land Use Goal of establishing
compatibility between land use and zoning in the area,as well
as the compatibility of residential and non-residential uses.
The plan also contained a goal of creating and maintain passive
and active recreational activities for everyone in the
community.An objective supporting the goal called for the
addition of park,recreational facilities,and activities in or
around the greater plan area.Two action statements supported
the previously mentioned objective.The first action statement
called for the completion of the Rock Creek Golf Course and Jack
Stevens Youth Golf Academy.The next action statement
recommended the provision of a walking trail designed to provide
access to the Jack Stephens Youth Golf Academy from Western
Hills Avenue.
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:17 FILE NO.:LU01-01-01,LU01-03-01,LU01-04-01,
(Cont.)LU01-05-01,LU01 09 01'U01 10 02
LU01-11-01,LU01-12-01,LU01-25-01
The B.)Normandy,C.)Grandview,H.)Birchwood,J.)Fletcher
Cemetery,and K.)Richlane Parks,are not located in an areas
covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action
plan.
ANALYSIS:
These are existing parks and open spaces (including a museum)in
existing neighborhoods and the change to Park/Open Space or
Public Institutional on city owned property should not have any
detrimental effect on the surrounding areas.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff believes the change is appropriate to recognize city owned
properties that are currently used as parks,open space,and
museums.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Mark Webre,Parks Staff,made a brief presentation of item 16 to
the commission.Dana Carney made a statement that items 17 and
18 were linked to item 16 and recommended approval of items 17
and 18 as presented in the staff reports.For a more complete
discussion,refer to item 16.A motion was made to approve the
item 17 as presented.The item was approved with a vote of
6 ayes,0 noes,4 absent and one open position.
5
May 31,2001
ITEM NO.:18
J%—"'ity of Little Rock Department of
Parks and Recreation
geest:To rezone all City of Little Rock
Municipal Parks Property from
various zoning categories to "PR"
Park and Recreation District.
On January 16,2001,the Board of Directors approved Ordinance
No.18,419 which provided for the creation of a new zoning
district to be titled "PR"Park and Recreation Zoning District.
The intent of the action was to create a zoning district
specifically for Park properties.Prior to that action,Parks
were permitted only in "OS"Open Space or as a Conditional Use
in the various zones.This has lead to parks being located on
properties zoned everything from R-2 to OS,C-3 and I-2.The
City's Parks and Recreation Department asked that the new zoning
classification be created in conjunction with an updated Master
Parks Plan.The new district was designed to accommodate the
wide variety of uses found in a large municipal parks system;
ranging from passive use areas and small picnic/playground parks
to large regional facilities such as Interstate Park,McArthur
Park and the proposed Clinton Library Park.Although the new
district was created in response to the City's interest in
rezoning municipal parks property,any park or recreation area
may be zoned to PR as long as the site is shown on the Master
Parks Plan.The option is also available for privately owned
park and recreation properties,such as P.O.A.owned pools and
and playgrounds.
The City of Little Rock Parks and Recreation Department is now
asking that all of the City-owned parkland be zoned PR.The
Parks property ranges in size from small,landscaped traffic
islands to the very large regional facilities like the
1,315-acre Fourche Bottoms and the 600-acre Regional Park 2000.
All of these sites are included in the updated Master Parks
Plan.Development of each site will conform to the Master Parks
Plan.
The Land Use Plan was reviewed for each site.With the
exception of 11 sites,the Plan recommends either Park/Open
Space or Public/Institutional for all of the properties.A Plan
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
Amendment has been proposed for the 11 sites in conjunction with
this rezoning action.
All neighborhood associations and coalitions were notified of
the rezoning request and the May 31,2001 Commission hearing
date.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(MAY 31,2001)
Mark Webre was present,representing the Department of Parks and
Recreation.There were no objectors present.Staff presented
the item and a recommendation of approval.
There were no questions asked and no further discussion took
place.
A motion was made to approve the requested rezonings.The
motion was approved by a vote of 6 ayes,0 noes,3 absent and
1 open position.
2
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
PARK -NAME AN5."QRNEPAL I'OCATXON .::ACREAGE =;xhp.=
1.Alexander Property;West of Meyer Lane,
north of the Pulaski County Line,east 80 Map 18.3
of Ridge Court and south of Alexander
Road.
2.Allsopp Park;In two parcels located
generally bounded by Cantrell Road,154 Maps 18.25
Cedar Hill Road,Kavanaugh Boulevard 18.26
and the Cliffewood and Edgehill
Additions.
3.Barton Park;North of W.25 Street,
east of Thayer Street and the MoPac 5 Map 18.11
Railroad,south of Adams Addition Lots
119-210 and 218 and west of Adams
Addition Lots 102-116.
4.Battery Islands;Traffic islands on
Battery Street bounded by 20 "and 21'/A Map 18.11Streets.
5.Benny Craig Park;North and west of the
MoPac Railroad,north and east of Gum 20 Map 18.5
Springs Road.
6.Birchwood Park;At the north end of
Creek Circle on the north perimeter of 3 Map 18.29
Birchwood Addition.
7.Boone Street Island;A traffic island
at the intersection of Barton Street N/A Map 18.15
and W.3'treet.
8.Boyle Park;Located north of W.36
Street,between John Barrow Addition,243 Maps 18.34
Maryton Park Addition,Talmage Forest &18.37
Addition and Broadmoor Addition.
9.Brodie Creek;51 Acres located along
Brodie Creek on the east side of 51 Map 18.32
Stagecoach Road,east of Tall Timber
Addition.
10.Butler Park;South of Rodney Parham
Road at the intersection with Old Forge N/A Map 18.30
Road.
11.Centennial Park;Bounded by Wolfe
Street,W.16 Street,W.15 Street 2 Map 18.11
and Battery Street.
3
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
PARK-NAME 'AND GENERAL LOCATION ACREAGE .MAP
12.Cheatem Park;Bounded by E.Capitol
Avenue,Kimball Street,E.6 Street 2 Map 18.19
and the LRSD warehouse property.
13.Cumberland and 2"Street Islands;
Traffic island located at the N/A Map 18.17
intersection of E 2"Street and
Cumberland Street.
14.Curran Conway;Bounded by W.24
Street,Harrison Street,W 26th Street 25 Map 18.35
and Monroe Street.
15.Dunbar;Bounded by W.16 Street,Gibbs
Elementary School and Dunbar Jr.High 6 Map 18.10
School,LRSD property and Chester
Street.
16.East Little Rock;The southeast 4 of
Section 1,T-l-N,R-12-W,located north 30 Map 18.19ofE.Capitol Avenue and south of
Arkansas River.
17.Fletcher;Bounded by I-630,Woodrow
Street and portions of Blocks 5 and 6,2 Map 18.9
Roots and Coys Addition.
18.Fletcher Cemetary;Located along the
Arkansas River east of Hermitage 32 Map 18.18
Homesites Addition.
19.Fourche Bottoms;West and north of I-
30,north of 65 Street,south of Asherth 1,315 Maps 18.5,
Avenue and east of University Avenue.18.6,18.7
&18.8
20.Gillam Park;East of US Highway 65/167,
South of I-440.350 Maps 18.8,
18.1321.Grandview Addition;Bounded by C.R.I.&
P.Railroad,East Palisades Addition,3 Maps 18.23
Scenic Drive,Rasco Subdivision and &18.24
Gates Replat.
22.Granite Heights;South of MoPac RR,
east of Springer Boulevard.10 Map 18.13
23.Granite Mountain;Bounded by Springer
Boulevard,Venice Court,Granite 2 Map 18.13
Mountain and bisected by California
Drive.
4
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
PARK NAME AND GENERAL ZOCATION ACREAGE M~MP
24.Hanger Hill Park;Bounded by East 13
Street,Hanger Street,E.11 Street 2 Map 18.17
and Geyer Street.
25.Hindman Community Park and Golf Course;
Located generally at the west end of 210 Map 18.32
and north of W.65 Street,west of
University Avenue.
26.Interstate Park;Located west of Arch
Street,north of I-30.71 Map 18.8
27.Jack Stephens Golf Academy;East of
Western Hills Avenue,north of Melba 250 Map 18.12
Drive,west of University Avenue.
28.Kanis Park;South of I-630,north of
Kanis Road,west of Rodney Parham Road.46 Map 18.37
29.Kiwanis Park;South of 40 Street,
between Foster and Holt Streets.12.4 Map 18.33
30.Knoop Park;East of Martin Street,
South of Cantrell Road,north of Ozark 45 Map 18.15Street,the Arkansas School for the
Blind and Deaf and the Worthen and
Walthaur Addition.
31.LaHarpe/Cantrell Road Traffic Islands;
All traffic islands located along N/A Map 18.16
LaHarpe and Cantrell Road.
32.McArthur Park;West of McAlmont Street,
south of E.9 Street,east of Commerce 39 Map 18.17Street,north of 13 Street,bisected
by I-630.
33.Meriwether Park;South of N.Hughes
Street,east of Florida Avenue,north 10 Map 18.36of"L"Street,west of Hall Cove
Subdivision.
34.Morehart Park;North of Mabelvale Cut-
off at its intersection with Heinke 43 Map 18.2
Road.
35.Murray Park;Along Riverfront Drive,
south of the Arkansas River,west of 166 Maps 18.22
Rebsamen Golf Course.&18.23
36.Normandy Addition;Three parcels in the
Normandy Addition,bounded by Normandy N/A Map 18.36
Drive,Garfield Street,lots 113-127
and lots 60-91 of Normandy Addition.
5
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
:PARK NAME AND GENER'AL I OCATXON ACREAGE MAP:.
37.Ninth Street Park;Bounded by W.9
Street,Lincoln's Addition,Pulaski 3 Map 18.10
Street and W.10 Street.
38.Oak Forest Park;Bounded by Coleman
Creek,W.14 and Pierce Streets.1 Map 18.38
39.Ottenheimer Park;Northeast of Dahlia
Drive,south of the MoPac RR in 11 Map 18.1
Cloverdale Addition.
40.Otter Creek Park;North side of the
11,500 block of Stagecoach Road.150 Map 18.31
41.Pankey Park;North of Piggee Street,
bisected by Russ Street.5 Map 18.21
42.Pettaway Park;Bounded by E.
21'treet,E.22"Street and Lots 502 and 5 Map 18.14
519 of Lincoln Zimmerman's Addition.
43.Pinedale Cove;South of Lots 31-39,
Pinedale Cove Addition,south of 5.51 Map 18.2
Pinedale Circle.
44.Prospect Terrace;North of "L"Street,
south of Southwood,west of Kavanaugh 4 Map 18.25
Boulevard.
45.Prospect Terrace Islands;A traffic
island on Southwood and three traffic N/A Map 18.25
islands on Crestwood,west of Kavanuagh
Boulevard.
46.Rebsamen Golf Course;Bounded by Murray
Park,C.R.I.and P.Railway,Riverdale 350 Map 18.24
Addition and the Arkansas River.
47.Rebsamen Parkway;West of Murray Park.
380 Maps 18.22
18.24
48.Regional Park 2000;600 acres located
south of Garrison Road in Section 13,600 Map 18.40
T-2-N,R-15-W.
49.Pratt C.Remmel Park;Bounded by
Lindsay Road,Fourche Creek,I-440 and 27 Map 18.18
the L.P.Coleman Subdivision.
50.Reservoir Park;South of Cantrell Road,
west of Reservoir Road.58 Map 18.3051.Richland Park;South of Fourche Dam
Pike,west of the 9000 block of Bermuda 5 Map 18.18
Lane.
6
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
PARK 'NAME.,AND GENERAL'OCAT-ZON ACREAGE
'MAP.-
52.River Mountain Park;Bounded by the
Walton Heights Subdivision,the 378 Map 18.21
Arkansas River,I-430,Highway 10 and
the Josephine Pankey Third Addition.
53.Riverfront Park;North of Markham
Street and LaHarpe Boulevard,west of 33 Maps 18.16
I-30 and east of Broadway.&18.17
54.Riverfront Presidential Park;Located
east of I-30,south of the Arkansas 27 Map 18.17
River.
55.Rock Creek Parkway;Two parcels located
along Rock Creek,south of St.Charles 125 Maps 18.27
Addition,west.of Bowman Road,along &18.28
and bounded by Chenal Parkway.
56.South Little Rock Park;Located on the
east side of Main Street,between 27 2 Map 18.14
and 29 Streets.
57.Southside Park;Located south of
Whitmore Circle,north of the C.R.I.13 Map 18.7
and P.Railroad.
58.Southwest;Located at 6401 Baseline
Road.92 Map 18.1
59.Stephens;Adjacent to Stephens School
at 18 and Maple Street.1 Map 18.9
60.Stifft Station/Capitol View Islands;
Four traffic islands located on Fern,N/A Map 18.15
Linden and Vernon Steets.
61.Swaggerty;Along Swaggerty Creek,
generally south of 31'treet,north of 6 Map 18.8
the C.R.I.&P.Railroad.
62.Taylor Loop Park;Along Taylor Loop
Creek,between Heatherbrae and 35 Map 18.20
Westchester Additions.
63.Terry Mansion;Bounded by E.7 Street,
Rock Street,E.8 Street and Johnson's 2 Map 18.7
Addition.
64.Thorn Park;Located west of Eva Lane,
north of Caylor Lane.7 Map 18.1
65.Two Rivers Park;Located on a
peninsula,between the Arkansas River 340 Map 18.39
and the Maumelle River.
7
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.:18 (Cont.)
PARK.:-HASE'HD QEHERAL —.:::L'OCATIQH .ACREAGE'--MAP:
66.University Park;Bounded by Tract B,Little Rock School District,Tract D &27 Map 18.37
E,Clary Street,West Park Tract IV and
Cleveland Street.
67.Wakefield Park;Bounded by Wakefield
Village,Woodson Road,Cornett 1 10 Map 18.4
Subdivision and Park Village
Subdivision.
68.War Memorial;Located south of Markham
Street,north of I-630 and east of 202 Map 18.38
University Avenue.
69.Weedman;Located along Rock Creek,
north of I-630,east of I-440.N/A Map 18.29
70.West End Park;Bounded by W.36
Street,Walker Street,38 Street and 10 Map 18.34
Potter Street.
8
PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
CO
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
VO
T
E
RE
C
O
R
D
DA
T
E
DH
j
Qe
,
N
O
M
E
N
i
p&
S
u
A
A
ME
M
B
E
R
0
f
l5
P.
]
8
RE
C
T
O
R
,
BI
L
L
v
DO
W
N
I
N
G
,
RI
C
H
A
R
D
Q7
E
'
A
NU
N
N
L
E
Y
,
OB
R
A
Y
v
BE
R
R
Y
,
CR
A
I
G
)L
AD
C
O
C
K
,
PA
M
v
RA
H
M
A
N
,
MI
Z
A
N
LO
W
R
Y
,
BO
B
AL
L
E
N
,
FR
E
D
,
JR
.
v'A
U
S
T
,
JU
D
I
T
H
MU
S
E
,
RO
H
N
RE
6
-
v
e
n
t
.
A6
-
S
~
k
k
-
ME
M
B
E
R
./
RE
C
T
O
R
,
BI
L
L
8
DO
W
N
I
N
G
,
RI
C
H
A
R
D
EA
NU
N
N
L
E
Y
OB
R
A
Y
Lw
r
~
r
y
"
,
3
g
v'
BE
R
R
Y
,
CR
A
I
G
v'D
C
O
C
K
,
PA
M
RA
H
M
A
N
,
MI
Z
A
N
y
LO
W
R
Y
,
BO
B
AL
L
E
N
,
FR
E
D
,
JR
.
v
FA
U
S
T
,
JU
D
I
T
H
MU
S
E
,
RO
H
N
e
Y
v
u
Me
e
t
i
n
g
Ad
j
o
u
r
n
e
d
N
~-
P.
M
.
+A
Y
E
NA
Y
E
~A
B
S
E
N
T
~K
A
B
S
T
A
I
N
~R
E
C
U
S
E
May 31,2001
May 31,2001
SUBDIVISION MINUTES
There being no further business before the Commission,the
meeting adjourned at 5:16 p.m.
7=y z-Pl
Date
Chairman Secre ary (