Loading...
boa_06 25 2007LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY OF MINUTES JUNE 25, 2007 2:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being four (4) in number. II. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings The Minutes of the May 21, 2007 meeting were approved as mailed by unanimous vote. III. Members Present: Members Absent: Andrew Francis, Chairman Terry Burruss, Vice Chairman James Van Dover Robert Winchester David Wilbourn City Attorney Present: Debra Weldon LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA JUNE 25, 2007 2:00 P.M. I. OLD BUSINESS: ITEM NO.: FILE NO.: LOCATION: A. Z-8215 4011 North Lookout B. Z-8205 922 Barber Street II. NEW BUSINESS: ITEM NO.: FILE NO.: LOCATION: 1. Z-8230 5800 Scott Hamilton Drive 2. Z-8231 2312 N. Arthur Street 3. Z-8232 2624 N. Grant Street 0) C: $_ • �� — 3>rld 83¢783 CIO 1ln7aIH1 A _ O HJd2 Z a 'Vy n m C n Y )LO UOpNo N7wa39 N � NIVW AVMOVOaB � =o NO1Np HOaV 31S3H0 9NIN lW a3H3aa 'B 0 ~ MOa000M 3N1d `^v 3NId y e aV039 11wV 11005 tq �o N8 d 8173 �J (� 3nINn A11S83AINn " SONIadS 83A39 3HOnH Idd15S SIW 5 s6 1091H0 ��`� alona3s3a MUM NHOf 3 w 2i c V o 3NN13H — � aao333>Io7Hs � Cd 31 07 s o slaa7s _ o� w H8Vd A3NOOa o — NVw OB < o _ � LINO HJhpJ E x 39018 AIA SJy1S o Y p�0\1 v //�i cn D _0 Q _ s 1a7M31s NVWIMS 4— c O S11WI3 A11o�=�� y� eJQ ��PJV� x S3p1NJ 31VON633 O m JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: A File No.: Z-8215 Owner/Applicant: Anita Aebersold Address: 4011 North Lookout Description: Lots 3 and 4 and the east 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 16, Hillcrest Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 to allow a building addition with reduced setbacks. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: Based on the existing conditions, stormwater from Read Street will potentially drain into the attached garage. Stormwater diversion methods should be utilized to protect the property and not damage neighboring properties. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 4011 North Lookout is occupied by a one-story brick and frame single family residence. The north property line of the lot fronts on North Lookout, with the southeast corner of the property fronting on Read Street for approximately 38 feet. There is an alley which runs along the remaining rear (south) property line. There is a one -car wide driveway from Read Street which serves as access. The property slopes downward from back to front (south to north). The existing residence is located significantly above the grade of North Lookout. The applicant is proposing to construct a 24 foot by 30 foot garage addition (one story), as noted on the attached site plan. The garage will be located on the east side of the house and connected to the northeast corner of the JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.) structure. The garage addition will be located 5.6 feet from the east side property line and 13 to 26 feet from the rear (south) property line. A new driveway from Read Street will serve the proposed garage addition. Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side setback of eight (8) feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Section 31-254(d)(3) requires a minimum rear setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance requirements to allow the proposed garage addition. Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Although the overall lot is very large in size, the applicant is limited with the placement of a building addition because of the lot's topography. The applicant is proposing placement of the garage addition in the most appropriate location on the lot. Staff views the requested reduced setbacks as very minor in nature. The garage addition will range from 13 feet to 26 feet back from the rear (south) property line. The existing house has a rear setback of only four (4) feet. Additionally, ample separation will exist between the proposed garage addition and the residence immediately to the east. The adjacent residence is located over 20 feet back from the side property line. Staff believes the proposed garage addition will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties on the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. The addition must be constructed to match the existing residence. 2. Compliance with the Public Works comment as noted in paragraph A. of the staff report. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (MAY 21, 2007) Staff informed the Board that the applicant requested the application be deferred to the June 25, 2007 Agenda. Staff supported the deferral request. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 nays and 0 absent. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JUNE 25, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. April 27, 2007 Monte Moore Planning Commission Little Rock, Arkansas D ear Mr. Moore, 1 am writing to you to request a variance of on a setback from one of the property lines on my personal residence located at 4011 North Lookout. The variance would be for an attached garage addition to the east side of my residence. There is currently 37.6' to the existing east property line and my proposed addition would be 3z', which falls in the .10% setback o f that property line. My lot is 125' wide and the setback for that line would be 12.5'. proposed addition would be 5.6' from the east property line. Cooperation and approval of the planning commission would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely. Dr. Anita yebersold -7-77,77=T: �, JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: B File No.: Z-8205 Owner: John Schlereth Applicant: Greg Criner, Lamar Outdoor Advertising Address: 922 Barber Street Description: West side of Barber Street, between East 9th and East 10th Streets Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the billboard provisions of Section 36-556 to allow increased height for an existing billboard. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Billboard Site Proposed Use of Property: Billboard Site STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The C-3 zoned property at 922 Barber Street is occupied by billboard owned by Lamar Outdoor Advertising. The billboard is a two-sided monopole type sign. It is located near the center of the lot. The billboard has an area of 14 feet by 48 feet, and a height of 34 feet -6 inches. The applicant proposes to increase the height of the billboard by 20 feet. The overall height of the billboard is proposed to be 54 feet -6 inches. The increased sign height is proposed due to the fact that the Highway Department recently installed a public information sign to the south along the east side of the interstate. The applicant claims that the new highway sign obstructs the visibility of the billboard. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: B (CON'T.) Section 36-556(a)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum billboard height of 35 feet in C-3 zoning. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the billboard height to be increased to 54 feet -6 inches. No other changes to the existing billboard are proposed. Staff is not supportive of the requested variance. Staff does not view the request as reasonable. Staff estimates the new informational sign placed by the Highway Department to be approximately 250 yards to the south of the existing billboard. Although the billboard may have some reduced visibility as viewed by vehicles approaching the sign, staff believes there is adequate area to view the billboard after passing the highway sign. Staff believes the increased billboard height could have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties and the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the requested billboard height variance. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (APRIL 30, 2007) Greg Criner and Tom Gibbons were present, representing the application. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of denial. Greg Criner addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained that the Highway Department has no maximum height for billboards as the City does. He explained the visibility issues associated with the billboard. He noted that there had been no negative comments from adjacent property owners. He explained that the increased billboard height would improve the visibility of the commercial building immediately to the north. James Van Dover asked whose view is obstructed. Mr. Criner explained that it would be drivers on 1-30. The issue of visibility was discussed. Chairman Francis noted that the visibility of the billboard was obstructed only a minimal amount. The issues of visibility and raising the north side of the billboard were discussed further. Tom Gibbons addressed the Board in support of the application. He briefly discussed the issue of visibility for both sides of the billboard. Robert Winchester asked if the Highway Department sign would cause a loss of revenue. Mr. Criner indicated that it would. Chris Wilbourn asked if the Highway Department had been approached about moving their informational sign. Vice -Chair Burruss noted that the Highway Department's willingness to work with the applicant was an important issue. This issue was discussed further. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: B (CON'T.) The issue of deferring the application to allow the applicant time to work with the Highway Department was discussed. Mr. Criner noted that a deferral would be acceptable. There was a motion to defer the application to the June 25, 2007 agenda. The motion passed by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 nays and 0 absent. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (J U N E 25, 2007) Greg Criner and Tom Gibbons were present, representing the application. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of denial. Staff noted that the applicant had submitted a letter from the State Highway Department, noting the highway sign could not be moved. Greg Criner addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained the Highway Department review of the issue, noting the sign could not be moved. He explained that the building immediately to the north would have better visibility with the increased billboard height. He explained that the requested billboard height was what was needed for the best visibility. Tom Gibbons also addressed the Board in support of the application. He noted that there were existing signs in the area as tall as the requested billboard height. He stated that he knew of no objectors to the proposed sign height. He also explained that billboards needed more visibility time for oncoming traffic. Vice -Chair Burruss asked about another billboard in the area. Mr. Gibbons noted that it was not over 40 feet in height. James Van Dover asked how the lower billboard affected the owner profit wise. Mr. Gibbons explained the marketability of the sign with respect to visibility. The issue was briefly discussed. Mr. Gibbons noted that the area of the sign could be reduced if the height variance were approved. Vice -Chair Burruss asked about sign lighting. Mr. Gibbons stated the lighting would not change. Chairman Francis noted non-support of the application. He explained that the existing sign had some visibility from 1-30 and the on-ramp to 1-30 from 1-630. He noted raising the sign would have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties. Robert Winchester expressed concern with the distance from which a billboard with increased height could be seen. He noted it could create a safety hazard. There was a motion to approve the application. The motion failed with a vote of 0 ayes, 4 nays and 1 absent. The application was denied. Re: Cover Letter for Application of Variance Mr. Moore, Lamar Outdoor Advertising, office presently located at 12001 Interstate 30 in Little Rock, is respectfully submitting an application to raise the overall height of the existing billboard, off-site sign, located at 922 Barber Street. This sign is permitted by the City of Little Rock, city permit number 17271, as well as the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, state permit number A 062050. Both permits which consider the site legal and conforming are current and valid since the date of build to the present. The current location, pole placement of the existing sign would remain the same. Lamar is requesting a variance solely to raise the overall height of the sign. This variance is requested due to a lack of visibility or obstruction of view. The placement of public information signage along the right of way of Interstate 30 has created this hardship. A picture depicting this obstruction is attached for reference. This obstruction has impaired our ability to effectively market the sign to our clients and reduced our ability to provide this valuable service to the public. The sign structure currently meets all setbacks and zoning criteria and is currently built to the maximum allowable height under City Sign Code — Section 36-556 ( a ) ( 2 ). We would request to raise the sign an additional 20 feet to restore the visibility of the sign back to its original condition. We have enclosed the three ( 3 ) copies of surveys which shows the property and location of sign as it currently resides on the property as well as the affidavit where the owner of record has given us his permission to make this request. We have also enclosed pictures depicting the obstruction currently and illustrations which show the specific nature of our proposal. We would indeed appreciate consideration in this matter and believe we are taking the proper steps to present the hardship and correct it at our expense. 120011-30 ® Little Rock, AR 72209 • (501) 562-2476 9 Fax (501) 568-0085 LAMAR If you have any questions or request additional information please feel free to contact us at 562-2476. CinnPrPly Tom (iibbens Vice President and GM for Lamar Advertising of Little Rock 120011-30 9 Little Rock, AR 72209 a, (501) 562-2476 e Fax (501) 568-0085 JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 1 File No.: Z-8230 Owner: Windsor Republic Doors, Inc. Applicant: Roger Bailey/Bruce Bates, Windsor Door Address: 5800 Scott Hamilton Drive Description: Northwest corner of Scott Hamilton Drive and Hoerner Street Zoned: 1-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36- 320 to allow a building addition with a reduced front setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Industrial Proposed Use of Property: Industrial STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Landscape and Buffer Issues: Site plan must comply with the cities minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. The southeast corner property line needs to reflect the minimal landscape perimeter width of nine feet. A variance from this minimal requirement will require approval from the City Beautiful Commission. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8% of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7'/z feet in width and 300 square feet in area. Proposed plan does not reflect this minimum. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of three (3) feet of building landscaping between the parking areas and the building. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.) An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to provide an approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this tree covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. C. Staff Analysis: The 1-2 zoned property at 5800 Scott Hamilton Drive is occupied by a one- story office/warehouse building which houses the Windsor Republic Doors manufacturing facility. The property is located at the northwest corner of Scott Hamilton Drive and Hoerner Street. There are access drives along Scott Hamilton Drive, with parking along the east side of the building. The office portion of the facility is located on the east side of the building. There are truck loading docks along the south side of the building and at the northeast corner of the structure. There is a large employee parking lot on the north side of the building, taking access from Scott Hamilton Drive. The applicant is proposing to construct a 145 foot by 184 foot addition on the southeast corner of the existing industrial building, as noted on the attached site plan. The building addition will be located 15-9" from the front (east) property line and approximately 80 feet from the south side property line. A new parking area will be located on the south side of the building addition. The proposed addition will eliminate some of the existing parking on the east side of the building, but ample parking exists on the site. The applicant notes that the building addition is proposed in order to move the company's distribution center, which is currently in Maumelle, to this site. Section 36-320(e)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front building setback of 50 feet for 1-2 zoned property. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the proposed addition with a 15'-9" front setback. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as reasonable. Scott Hamilton is a rather wide right-of-way at 100 feet. The City's Master Street Plan designates Scott Hamilton as a Collector Street, with a required right-of-way of 60 feet. Therefore, there is 20 additional feet of right-of-way along this side of Scott Hamilton Drive. With the additional right- of-way, there will be a landscaped area having a width of over 60 feet along the east side of the proposed building addition (between it and street pavement). The applicant could request abandonment of the additional right- of-way in the future. Given the right-of-way issue combined with the industrial nature of the property and surrounding properties, staff feels the proposed JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.) addition will be compatible wit the area. Staff believes the proposed addition will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. D. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance, subject to compliance with the landscape/buffer requirements as noted in paragraph B. of the agenda staff report. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JUNE 25, 2007) Bruce Bates was present, representing the application. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval. Bruce Bates addressed the Board in support of the application. He noted that a petition to abandon the excess Scott Hamilton Drive right-of-way would be filed in the future. Chairman Francis asked why the building addition had to be at the southeast corner of the building. Mr. Bates explained that the manufacturing process within the commercial facility was from north to south, with addition being for the distribution phase. James Van Dover asked about filing the right-of-way abandonment application. Mr. Bates noted the application had not yet been filed. He explained that the additional right-of-way area could be used for parallel parking and truck access for loading customer vehicles. The issue was further discussed. Mr. Van Dover asked what the survey stakes on the property represented. The issue was briefly discussed. Vice -Chair Burruss asked if the applicant would accept a condition that the petition to abandon the excess right-of-way be filed. Mr. Bates stated that it would be acceptable. Chairman Francis asked if it could be done in 60 days. Mr. Bates indicated that it could. James Van Dover explained that he could not support the application. Chairman Francis explained that he could support the application as long as the petition to abandon the excess right-of-way was filed within 60 days. Vice - Chairman Burruss concurred with Mr. Francis. There was a motion to approve the application as recommended by staff, with the additional condition that a right-of-way abandonment application for the excess Scott Hamilton right-of-way be filed within 60 days. The motion passed with a vote of 3 ayes, 1 nay and 1 absent. The application was approved. WINDSOR REPUBLIC DOORS 5800 Scott Hamilton Dr. P.O. Bog 8915 (72219-8915) j f Little Rock, AR 72209 501-562-1872 —2 May 24, 2007 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Ar 72201-1334 Re: Windsor Republic Door Inc. Zoning Variance Dear Sirs, Windsor Republic Door was purchased out of the prior company's bankruptcy in January of 2004. Since that time the company's financial condition has improved only slightly due to large raw material and freight price increases and a significant downturn in the national housing market. I can assure you that we expect to be marginally profitable in 2007 and hopefully show significant improvements in 2008. We currently employ approximately 150 hourly and 100 salaried employee in the Little Rock area. The request for a zoning variance will allow us to consolidate our Distribution Center in Maumelle with the factory. This will eliminate some of the rent and overhead costs of the combined operations and improve our long term prospects in both the national and regional markets that we currently serve. The management and employees of Windsor Republic would like to thank for your consideration of this request. Best regard, / T 4 M ,4 Roger Bailey C.F.O. Windsor Republic Doors, Inc. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 2 File No.: Owner/Applicant: Address: Description: Zoned: Z-8231 Michael and Laura Parker 2312 N. Arthur Street Lot 9, Block 6, Altheimer's Addition R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36- 254 to allow a porch addition with a reduced front setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 2312 N. Arthur Street is occupied by a one-story frame single family residence which is in the process of being remodeled. There is also a building addition on the rear (west) of the structure which is currently under construction. There is a one -car wide driveway at the northeast corner of the property. There is also an existing covered porch on the front, southeast corner of the residence. The existing porch is located 16.3 feet back from the front (east) property line. In conjunction with the remodeling project, the applicant proposes to remove the existing front porch structure and construct a new front porch along the entire front of the home. The porch will be covered and unenclosed, with new columns and railing. The proposed porch will maintain the same 16.3 foot setback from the front (east) property line as the existing covered porch. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.) Section 36-254(d)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front setback of 25 feet for R-2 zoned lots. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the new covered porch with a front setback of 16.3 feet. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the reconstruction and extension of the front porch as a relatively minor issue. There are slight variations in the front setbacks of the existing residences along N. Arthur Street. The proposed porch addition will be located only three (3) to four (4) feet closer to the front property line than the front facades of the residences at 2320 and 2308 N. Arthur Street, as well as other residences along N. Arthur Street. There are also a few similar porch encroachments in this general area. Staff believes the proposed porch encroachment will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. The porch structure must be constructed to match the existing residence, as per the elevation submitted to staff. 2. The porch must remain unenclosed on its north, south and east sides. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (J U N E 25, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. May 24 2007 z-2 9�'2-3 1 Mr. Dana Carney City of Little Rock Planning and Development Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Carney: Enclosed is an application requesting approval for a proposed extension of an existing front porch at 2312 N. Arthur in Little Rock. I am asking for a variance to allow the proposed extension of the front porch to match the existing front porch which encroaches within 16.3' of the front property line whereas ordinance requires a 25' setback. This extension of the front porch matches the pre-existing condition of the present front porch which impacts the setback along the street and does not affect the interior lot lines. I am requesting the variance to cover the front doorway entry as well as the remaining front of the house and to enhance the street appeal of the property. I understand and will comply with the required notifications and will appear before the Board of Adjustment at the appointed time and place. If you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this application please contact me. Sincerely, Michael Parker JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 3 File No.: Z-8232 Owner: Dennis Lucy Applicant: Stanley Schulte Address: 2624 N. Grant Street Description: Lot 12 and the north'/2 of Lot 11, Block 21, Park View Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36- 156 to allow enclosure of an existing carport with a reduced street side setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 2624 N. Grant Street is occupied by a one-story frame single family residence. The property is located at the southwest corner of N. Grant and "Y" Streets. There is a two -car wide driveway from "Y" Street which serves as access. A one-story frame carport/storage building is located along "Y" Street, near the northwest corner of the property. The carport is located 6.6 to 7 feet back from the north, street side, property line. The applicant is proposes to enclose the existing carport/storage structure, converting it to a garage structure. The proposed enclosure will not extend outside the existing footprint of the carport/storage structure, maintaining the existing street side setback. JUNE 25, 2007 ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.) Section 36-254(a)(2)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum street side setback of 15 feet for accessory structures in R-2 zoning. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to enclose the existing accessory structure and maintain the existing 6.6 to 7 foot street side setback. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as very reasonable. The proposal to enclose the existing carport/storage structure will not change the massing of structures and building coverage on this lot. The street side setback of the existing structure is not out of character with the neighborhood. There are other accessory and principal structures along "Y" Street to the east and west with similar street side setback. Staff believes the proposed enclosure of the existing carport/storage structure will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance, subject to the carport enclosure matching the existing residential structure. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JUNE 25, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. SCHULTE CONSTRUCTI®N "A NAME YOU CAN TRUST SINCE 1945" 7905 FOXCHASE ROAD, SUITE A LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 501/224-0968 FAX 224-0458 -Z 3Z - Thank You, Schutle Construction 11 i L Q CQ) G z m Q z w U) m Q w 4 - z � � z D 0 ui ° o n � � Q m O {W- p W w Z w Z U >O D 2 Q C) O w ¢ z m z LIE m>�E� O U W W O _ Z � LU F Q LL � 1- O m �J" - f - i L Q CQ) G z m Q z w U) m Q w 4 - z � � z D 0 ui ° o n � � Q m O {W- p W w Z w Z U >O D 2 Q C) O w ¢ z m z LIE m>�E� f W Qm Q F ° w WC6 U) U) > W m z D o O= m U LLI Q z z LL m i L Q CQ) G z m Q z w U) m Q w 4 - z � � z D 0 ui ° o n � � Q m O {W- p W w Z w Z U >O D 2 Q C) O w ¢ z m z LIE m>�E� June 25, 2007 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:38 p.m. Date: -7 /le /lei Chairman