boa_02 26 2007LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
2:00 P.M.
Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being five (5) in number.
Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings
The Minutes of the January 29, 2007 meeting were
approved as mailed by unanimous vote, with one (1) abstention.
Members Present
Members Absent:
City Attorney Present:
Andrew Francis, Chairman
Terry Burruss, Vice Chairman
James Van Dover
David Wilbourn
Robert Winchester
None
Debra Weldon
LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
2:00 P.M.
I. OLD BUSINESS:
ITEM NO.: FILE NO.: LOCATION:
A. Z-8150 21 Dellwood Drive
B. Z-8125 5130 "P" Street
II. NEW BUSINESS:
ITEM NO.: FILE NO.: LOCATION:
1. Z -5639-A
5123 Edgewood Road
2. Z -7573-D
6801 West 12th Street
3. Z -7765-A
917 S. Broadway
4. Z-8171
5105 Edgewood Road
5. Z-8172
44 Valley Club Circle
6. Z-8173
11220 Rodney Parham Road
O
0N
■ � 3NId
— 2131Ztlilj �
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: A
File No.: Z-8150
Owner/Applicant: Eddie Smith
Address: 21 Dellwood Drive
Description: Lot 43, Eastwood Heights Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-156
and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow an accessory building with reduced
setbacks and which crosses a platted building line.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 21 Dellwood Drive is occupied by a one-story brick
and frame single family residence. There is a two -car wide driveway from
Dellwood Drive which serves as access. There is a small metal storage
building in the rear yard area. The lot contains a 25 foot front and street side
platted building line along Dellwood Drive.
The applicant proposes to construct an 8 foot by 16 foot accessory storage
building near the southeast corner of the property, as noted on the attached
site plan. The accessory building will be located approximately seven (7) feet
to 10 feet from the street side property line. The structure will be located
approximately 7.5 feet from the east (rear) property line and 9.8 feet from the
south side property line. All but a very small sliver of the building will be
located between the 25 foot side platted building line and the street side
property line.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.
Section 36-156(a)(2)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that accessory
buildings in R-2 zoning have a minimum street side setback of 15 feet.
Section 31-12( c) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that encroachments
across platted building lines be reviewed and approved by the Board of
Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances to allow the new
accessory building with a reduced street side setback and which crosses the
side platted building line.
Staff is not supportive of the requested variances. Staff feels the proposed
accessory building will be out of character with neighborhood. All of the
structures along Dellwood Drive maintain similar setbacks behind the platted
building lines as established by the original plat of the subdivision. The
proposed accessory building will have the appearance of being in the front
yard of the property immediately to the south. Additionally, staff believes there
is adequate space in the rear yard, near the existing accessory building where
the new proposed building could be placed without variances. Although the
owner of the property immediately to the south agrees with the placement of
the proposed accessory building, staff believes the placement will have an
adverse visual impact on the adjacent property and the general area.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to
complete a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted side building line
for the new accessory building. The applicant should review the filing
procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a
revised Bill of Assurance.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested setback and building line variances.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(DECEMBER 18, 2006)
Eddie Smith was present, representing the application. There were no objectors
present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of denial.
Eddie Smith addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained that
the proposed accessory building would be constructed to match the existing
residence. He noted that there were fruit trees in the rear yard which he was trying
to preserve.
Chairman Francis noted that the shape of the lot was unique. He explained that the
proposed location of the accessory building would have an adverse visual impact on
the property next door, and that the current owner may not always occupy that
residence.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.
There was discussion of moving the structure to another location within the rear
yard. Mr. Smith noted that an overhead power line dictated the placement of the
structure within the rear yard.
Staff noted that if the item were deferred, staff could make a site visit and locate the
overhead power line and trees on the survey. Mr. Smith indicated that he did not
want a deferral.
There was a lengthy discussion between the Board, Mr. Smith and staff. During the
discussion several alternate locations for the accessory building were discussed.
The issue of private utility lines with respect to the placement of the accessory
structure was also discussed.
Chairman Francis and Chris Wilbourn indicated that they did not support the
application as filed.
There was additional discussion of deferring the application.
A motion was made to defer the application to the January 29, 2007 Agenda to allow
time for staff to meet with Mr. Smith on the property and discuss alternate locations
for the accessory structure. The motion passed by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 nays, 1
absent and 1 open position. The application was deferred.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JANUARY 29, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the application needed to be deferred to the February
26, 2007 Agenda, as the applicant had placed a new accessory building on the
property and staff needed time to verify it meeting setback requirements.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred by a vote of 3 ayes, 0
nays, 0 absent and 2 open positions.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant contacted staff on February 23, 2007 and
requested the application be withdrawn. Staff supported the withdrawal request.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and withdrawn by a vote of 5 ayes and
0 nays.
To whom it may concern,
My name is Eddie Smith owner and resident of 21 Dellwood drive I
am submitting this paperwork in order to permit me to place a storage
shelter on my property. In order to place this storage building, I come
before the board of adjustment in hopes that I can place a storage 5
feet off the back fence line south side, 13 feet from the curb" fence
line east side, and 16 feet in from the fence on the Westside. It will
place my storage approximately in the area shown in the diagram
below. By placing the storage in this area it will save my pecan tree
from being cut down and be an asset to the beautification of the
property.
11%22%08 NEL 15:38 FAY $41 257 3182
November 20, 2006
City of Little Rock
Play ing and Development
723 W. Markham
Little Rook, AR 72201
Tv Whom It May Concern:
Z001
rl
Tbis letter is to inform the Board of Adjustment that MY. Eadie C. Smith, owner of the
property at 21 Dell -wood Drive; has talked to me about the placement of a. storage
building on his property. lie has made me aware of the location, and 1 agree that the
location is not an issue. This statement is in lieu of me signing the petition of agreement
that Mr. Smith sent before the Board.
Sincerely,
Wit;
(wot� i�� -�►'7?
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: B
File No.: Z-8125
Owner: Todd Wilson George
Applicant: Todd Wilson George
Address: 5130 "P" Street
Description: Lot 17, Block 3, McGehee's Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-
254 to allow a carport addition with a reduced side setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property located at 5130 "P" Street is occupied by a one-story
brick and frame single family residence. There is a one car wide driveway
from "P" Street at the southwest corner of the property. The driveway extends
along the west side of the house. There is a small accessory storage building
in the rear yard, with an alley running along the north (rear) property line.
The applicant proposes to construct a 10 foot by 25 foot carport structure on
the west side of the existing residence, over the existing driveway. The
proposed carport addition will be unenclosed on its south, west and a portion
of the north sides. The carport structure is proposed to be located one (1) foot
from the west side property line, and 42 feet back from the front (south)
property line.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: B (CON'T.)
Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side
setback of five (5) feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow the reduced side setback. The applicant is also
proposing room and deck additions to the rear of the residence. These
proposed additions conform to ordinance standards and are in the process of
being constructed.
Staff does not support the requested side setback variance. It has been staff's
past policy to support setbacks of no less than 18 inches for this type of
unenclosed structure. Staff views an 18 inch side setback as a minimum area
needed to construct and maintain the carport structure without encroaching
onto the adjacent property to the est. If the applicant were willing to provide an
18 inch side setback, including overhang, staff could support the application.
The application would have to install guttering to prevent water run-off onto the
adjacent property to the west. The guttering could be within the 18 inch side
setback. With these changes, staff would view the carport structure as having
no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested side setback variance, as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(NOVEMBER 27, 2006)
Staff informed the Board that the application needed to be deferred to the December 18,
2006 Agenda due to the fact that the applicant failed to complete the required
notification to surrounding property owners as required.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred to the December 18, 2006
agenda by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 open position.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(DECEMBER 18, 2006)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant requested the application be deferred to the
January 29, 2007 Agenda. Staff supported the deferral request.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 nays,
1 absent and 1 open position.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: B (CON'T.)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(JANUARY 29, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant requested the application be deferred to the
February 26, 2007 Agenda. Staff supported the deferral request.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 nays,
0 absent and 2 open positions.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant contacted staff on February 23, 2007 and
requested the application be deferred to the March 26, 2007 agenda. Staff supported
the deferral request.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred by a vote of 5 ayes and o
nays.
11. ±.31L�J�b 1!:3� f/ tf!t�CubGb-'•4 APT.: PAGE 021
Todd George
5130 P Street
.Little Rock, AR. 72207
November 13, 2006
�? - �'/'1
Mr. Mon' Moore
Little Rock Plartrting & Development
Board of Adjustments
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR.. 72201
Re: Request for variance at 5130 P Street, Little Rock; AR. 72207
:Dear Members of the Board:
This .letter is to respectfully request a variance in order to place an open -sided carport
within the boundaries previously established. As mentioned, this open -sided carport
would have gutteri;xg and no sides within the boundary. The neighbors to die Vilest,
Michael & Dina Fates have given their consent to this project. Should you require any
additional information please feel free to contact the at 501-425-2340.
Sincerely,
Todd. Creersie
TG:jh
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 1
File No.: Z -5639-A
Owner: Miriam May Hundley
Applicant: Carolyn Lindsey
Address: 5123 Edgewood Road
Description: Lot 57, Prospect Terrace Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254
to allow a building addition with a reduced side setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 5123 Edgewood Road is occupied by a two-story
stucco single family residence. There is a two -car wide driveway from
Edgewood Road which serves as access. The property is located on the
south side of Edgewood Road, east of N. Harrison Street.
The applicant proposes to construct a one-story porch addition, as noted on
the attached site plan. The proposed porch will be partially covered and
partially screened in. The porch addition will have a setback from the west
side property line ranging from 4.5 feet (steps) to 6.5 feet. The porch will be
located 17 feet to 18.5 feet from the east side property line, and over 30 feet
from the rear (south) property line. A covered walkway will extend from the
porch addition to an existing accessory building at the southeast corner of the
property.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.)
Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side
setback of 6.7 feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow the porch addition with a setback along the west
side property line ranging from 4.5 to 6.5 feet.
Staff is supportive of the requested side setback variance. Staff views the
proposed side setback ranging from 4.5 to 6.5 feet as being a relatively minor
encroachment into the required 6.7 foot side yard. The residence immediately
to the west is located over 10 feet from the dividing side property line.
Therefore, there should be no issue with separation between the residence
and proposed addition. Also, the southwest corner of the existing residence at
5123 Edgewood Road is five (5) feet from the west side property line. Staff
believes the proposed addition will not be out of character with the
neighborhood, and will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or
the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested side setback variance, subject to
the covered walkway between the addition and accessory building remaining
unenclosed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the
item and a recommendation of approval.
Staff added the following condition of approval as requested by the Board:
There is to be no additional water run-off onto adjacent properties as a result
of the proposed building addition.
The applicant offered no additional comments.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays.
Yeary Lindsey Architects
January 25, 2007
Mr. Monte Moore
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham St.
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Zoning Variance Application for
Hundley Residence, 5123 Edgewood Rd.
Dear Monte,
We are requesting a zoning variance at 5123 Edgewood Road to allow an
encroachment into the west side yard setback of 6.7 feet.
Our proposed plan includes a one-story partially covered / partially screened porch that
wraps around the previous two story Den addition. The covered portion encroaches 1.7
feet into the west side yard setback with the steps encroaching 2.2 feet to provide
all 0.65 feet clear depth of porch symmetrically around the Den.
We would like to note that the southwest corner of the original house is five feet from the
property line, so the property in its original state encroaches 1.7 feet, not complying with
the side yard setback requirements. Also, the neighboring house sits further than the
required setback from this shared property line.
It is our opinion that since the proposed porch encroaches no further than the original
two-story residence, such a minor one-story open covered porch encroachment would
be inconsequential to the overall scale and character of Edgewood Road. We would
also like to note that to narrow the porch on this side would cause a change in slope of
the roof at that location only which is not only structurally complicated but aesthetically
unpleasing.
The Screened Porch is connected to the existing Guest House with an unenclosed but
covered walkway. As the porch is twelve feet from the Guest House, it is our
understanding that this complies with the code.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
C"&r b rldW6-
Carolyn Lindsey, AIA
319 President Clinton Ave., Suite 201 Little Rock, AR 72201 501-372-5940 FX: 501-707-0118
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 2
File No.: Z -7573-D
Owner: Danny Thomas Properties V Limited Partnership
Applicant: Kathy Johnson
Address: 6801 W. 12th Street
Description: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Robert's Replat
Zoned: 1-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the sign provisions of Section 36-554 to
allow a ground sign with increased area.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Mixed Office/Warehouse and Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Mixed Office/Warehouse and Commercial
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The 1-2 zoned property at 6801 W. 12th Street is occupied by three (3)
office/warehouse type buildings, as noted on the attached site plan. The
property is located at the southwest corner of W. 12th Street and Caruth Street.
Driveways from W. 12th Street and Caruth Street serve as access to the
property. There is a small ground -mounted sign at the northeast corner of the
property. There is also a set of old sign poles approximately 50 feet west of
the existing sign.
The applicant proposes to remove the existing sign at the northeast corner of
the property and place new signage on the existing set of sign poles, to
advertise tenants within the complex. The new sign will be 21 feet in height,
with an area of 100 square feet. It appears that the sign will be approximately
10 feet back from the front (north) property line.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.)
Section 36-554(a)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum sign
height of 30 feet and a maximum area of 72 square feet for ground -mounted
signs in industrial zoning. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to
allow 100 square feet of sign area for the proposed ground -mounted sign.
Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as
reasonable. The proposed sign is only 28 square feet over the maximum
allowed area, with the proposed height being well under the 30 foot height
allowed. The proposed sign will not be out of character with other signage in
this area along W. 12th Street. The proposed sign will provide needed visibility
for the businesses in the southernmost two (2) buildings within this
development. Staff believes the proposed sign will have no adverse impact on
the adjacent properties or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested sign variance, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The existing ground -mounted sign at the northeast corner of the property
must be removed.
2. A sign permit must be obtained for the new sign.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the
item and a recommendation of approval.
The applicant offered no additional comments.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays.
January 24, 2007
Department of Planning and Development
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Sign Variance
Parkwood Center
6801 West 12'' Street
Little Rock, AR 72207
Dear Board of Adjustment:
We would like to request a sign variance at Parkwood Center located at 6801 West 12`h Street in Little Rock,
Arkansas. Our property is currently zoned I-2, but over 34% of our current tenants have Retail as a conditional use.
Signage, as you know is very important to a retail business.
Our current sign, which has deteriorated and fallen apart, was 100 sq. ft., the topper was 8' X 8', and the poles and
cabinet were 4' X 12'. This sign was not large enough to house all of our tenants. In addition, our tenant's
individual signs were so small that passing cars could not read them. Therefore, the current sign has not been
beneficial to our tenants.
The sign we are proposing will be a lighted sign, to benefit our tenants that are open at night time. It will be placed
on two existing poles that originally had a lighted sign on them many years ago. The electricity is already run to
the poles. The proposed topper will be 4' X 10', since the existing poles are further apart than the ones we have on
our current sign. The cabinet itself is 10' X 6' with legs that extend for another 7'. Because of the position of the
sign to the parking lot, we can not start the bottom rung of the cabinet any lower or it would be hidden behind
parked vehicles.
This property was in grave need of repair. In October of 2005, we began an exterior renovation of this property that
has greatly improved the look of not only our property, but of the community around us. The new signage is our
last phase of this exterior renovation. Please help us to continue to make this property a site that the city can be
proud of.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
DANNY THOMAS MANAGEMENT, INC.
4M �C�t�
Kathy Johnson
Managing Director
400 Centre Place, 212 Center Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 374-2231 FAX (501) 374-8990
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.:
File No.: Z -7765-A
Owner: Dan Johnson
Applicant: Coleman Alexander, Tri -Sign
Address: 917 S. Broadway
Description: Northeast corner of Broadway and 1-630
Zoned: UU
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the sign provisions of Section 36-
342.1 and 36-557 to allow a ground -mounted sign in the UU Zoning District, and wall signs
without street frontage.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Restaurant ( under construction)
Proposed Use of Property: Restaurant
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The UU zoned property at 917 S. Broadway contains a Starbucks restaurant
which is in the process of construction. The building is located within the north
half of the property, with a drive-thru window on its north wall. There are
access drives from Broadway and an alley right-of-way along the east property
line. There is paved parking on the south side of the building.
In conjunction with the restaurant development, the applicant proposes to
place a ground -mounted sign at the northwest corner of the property. The sign
will have a height of 35 feet and an area of approximately 108.5 square feet.
The applicant is also proposing to place wall signs on all four (4) walls of the
building. The north and east walls of the building do not have direct street
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.)
frontage. The applicant is proposing a 48 inch round logo sign on the north
and east walls.
Section 36-342.1(c)(11) of the City's Zoning Ordinance prohibits ground -
mounted signs in the UU (Urban Use) Zoning District. Section 36-557(a)
requires that all wall signage face required street frontage. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting variances to allow a ground -mounted sign in the UU
zoning district and two (2) wall signs (north and east building facades) without
direct street frontage.
Staff is supportive of the variances associated with the proposed ground -
mounted sign and wall sign on the north building facade. Staff believes these
signs will provide needed visibility to the new restaurant building. With respect
to the ground -mounted sign, this area along Broadway, south of Capitol
Avenue, is a vehicular oriented area of Downtown Little Rock with several fast
food type businesses. These businesses, including a tire shop and hotel, have
commercial type pole signs. Staff feels the proposed ground sign and wall
sign (north facade) will not be out of character with the general area. With
respect to the wall sign on the east (rear) building fagade, staff feels this sign
serves no purpose, as it will face another building and alley. Staff feels this
sign should be eliminated from the signage proposal for the property.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the sign variance application, as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on February 23,
2007 revising the application to eliminate the proposed wall sign on the east side of
the building, as suggested by staff. Staff recommended approval of the revised
application, subject to permits being obtained for all signage.
The applicant offered no additional comments.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff by a vote of 4 ayes and 1 nay. James Van Dover voted nay with respect to the
variance to allow a ground -mounted sign
3
7-745`4
(FAYETTEVILLE, NORTHWEST ARKANSAS, FORT SMITH & CENTRAL ARKANSAS)
SINCE 1973
P.O. BOX 23279 / HWY 22 / BARLING, AR 72923 / TELEPHONE (479)452-4850 / FAX (479)452-4851
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing to request some signage at 917 South Broadway that is in the UU area. This is a Starbucks
location that is being erected on the service exit ramp and Broadway. There have been some restrictions
applied recently that prohibit pylon signage. There is one other variance being asked for on the same
property.
First, the pylon sign would be 35 feet OAH and would set where an existing sign was. Due to the location is
would stand about the same height as the other signage up and down the road. However, the old pole would
need to be removed and the new one erected. The sign would be very visible from. I 630 which is the desired
response. While Starbucks understands that it is a special area it feels that the signage would be in line with
all others in the area and that this location will bring business to the area. Proper signage car. help achieve
this.
The building faces Broadway and Monty has agreed that the access ramp borders the property so that two
building signs are allowed. This only leaves one other sign in question. The Logo on the NW corner of the
building which could be seen as traffic flows from the downtown area. Again, this seems to be within the
same guidelines as in the past but has simply come along at an in -opportune time.
While Starbucks isn't trying to rock the boat it has some legitimate concerns about the signage here and
would appreciate your careful consideration. All signage is tasteful and attractive and would aid in the
identity of the services offered.
Thank you for your time and consideration and if I may be of assistance please feel free to call me at 479-
452-4850 wk or 479-263-7446 cell.
Sincerely,
Coleman Alexander
Tri -Sign, Inc
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4
File No.: Z-8171
Owner: Anne Hickman
Applicant: Justin Couch, Allison Architects
Address: 5105 Edgewood Road
Description: Lot 60 and the east half of Lot 59, , Prospect Terrace Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254
to allow a building addition with reduced side and rear setbacks.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 5105 Edgewood Road is occupied by a two-story
brick and frame single family residence. There is a two -car wide driveway
from Edgewood Road which serves as access. The property is located on the
south side of Edgewood Road, east of N. Harrison Street and one block
southwest of Kavanaugh Blvd. There is an attached carport on the west side
of the house, and an accessory dwelling (detached) within the rear yard along
the rear (south) property line. The accessory dwelling is brick and frame and
one-story in height. It is located 3.5 to 5 feet from the rear (south) property
line, partially within a four -foot wide easement along the rear property line.
The applicant proposes to remove the accessory dwelling and carport
structures from the property, and construct a one-story addition on the rear of
the home as noted on the attached site plan. The addition will be a master
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.)
bedroom/bath with sitting area. The addition will be located 7'-8" to 11'-6" from
the rear (south) property line and 4'-11" to 7'-6" from the side (west) property
line. Additionally, an attached canvas carport structure will be constructed on
the west side of the house shifted slightly to the north from the existing carport
location.
Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side
setback of eight (8) feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Section 36-254(d)(3) requires a
minimum rear setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting
variances to allow the proposed building addition with reduced side (west) and
rear (south) setbacks. The applicant notes that the proposed addition is
located within the footprint of existing structures to leave the mature trees on
the site undisturbed.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Staff feels the proposed
building addition will not be out of character with other residential structures in
this neighborhood. The proposed building addition will be located further back
from the rear (south) property line than the existing accessory dwelling, and
therefore should have a lesser impact on the adjacent property to the south.
The applicant has designed the building addition to preserve existing trees and
landscaped areas within the rear yard of this lot. The overall massing of the
residence with new addition is a very minor increase in the building massing
that currently exists on the property. Staff believes the proposed building
addition will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general
area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variances, subject to the
building addition being constructed to match the existing residence.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the
item and a recommendation of approval.
The applicant offered no additional comments.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays.
A L L I S O N
ME
ARCHITECTS
January 24, 2007
Department of Planning and Development
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Addition at 5105 Edgewood Road
Dear Members of the Board of Adjustments:
Please find enclosed our application for a variance allowing the addition of a master
bedroom on the first floor of the existing house at 5105 Edgewood Rd. There is currently
a guesthouse on the site that we plan to demolish. The guesthouse is located within the
forty -foot setback described in the Bill of Assurance for this.property. In order to leave
the mature trees on site undisturbed, it is our intention to locate the new addition
primarily within the old footprint of the guesthouse. By using the site of the old
guesthouse, we will build within the twenty-five foot, rear -yard setback and the eight -
foot, side -yard setback. We are requesting a variance for these two setbacks.
Sincerely,
ustin K. Couch
Allison Architects
ALLISON ARCHITECTS, Inc.
200 West Capitol, Suite 1400
Little Rock, AR 72201
Tel 501 376 0717 Fax 501 376 1766
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 5
File No.: Z-8172
Owner: A.L. S. Management, LLC
Applicant: David Underwood
Address: 44 Valley Club Circle
Description: Lot 7R, Block 20, Pleasant Valley Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-156
and the easement provisions of Section 36-11 to allow accessory buildings with reduced side
setback and which extend into a utility easement.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Utility Comments:
Entergy — No objection to encroachment into 10 foot easement. Entergy's
facilities are along the front property line.
AT & T - No objection to encroachment.
Central Arkansas Water — No objection to encroachment. All facilities located
within public right-of-way along front property line.
Little Rock Wastewater — No objection to encroachment. Sewer main located
in the right-of-way of Valley Club Circle.
Centerpoint Energy — No objection to encroachment.
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 5 (CON'T.)
C. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 44 Valley Club Circle is occupied by a two-story
brick, rock and frame single family residence which is in the process of being
remodeled. There is a two -car driveway from Valley Club Circle which serves
as access. A circular drive is located in the front yard area, extending along
the south side of the house. There is a 10 foot wide utility easement located
along the rear (west) property line. The property backs up to the Pleasant
Valley Golf Course.
The applicant proposes to construct two (2) accessory structures on the
property, as noted on the attached site plan. The first is an in -ground pool
located within the south half of the rear yard area. The pool will be
approximately 40 feet along and located 8.5 feet back from the rear (west)
property line, extending approximately 1.5 feet into the 10 foot utility easement.
The pool will be located over six (6) feet back from the principal structure.
The second proposed accessory structure is a carport/pool house structure
(one-story) located at the southwest corner of the property. The carport
portion of the structure is approximately 20.4 feet by 27.9 feet in size, with the
pool house portion being 20.7 feet by 12.5 feet. The carport/pool house
structure will be located two (2) feet to 4.5 feet from the side (south) property
line and four (4) feet from the rear (west) property line. This structure extends
approximately six (6) feet into the 10 foot utility easement. The two (2)
accessory structures will occupy approximately 20 percent of the required rear
yard (rear 25 feet of the lot). An open trellis will connect the carport structure
to the house.
Section 36-11(f) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires the Board of
Adjustment review and approve requests for building construction to encroach
into utility easements. Section 36-156(a)(2)f. requires accessory buildings to
be located at least three (3) feet back from side and rear property lines.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the accessory
structures to encroach 1.5 to 6 feet into the utility easement along the rear
property line, and a variance to allow the carport/pool house structure to have
a side setback (south) ranging from two (2) feet to 4.5 feet.
Staff does not support the requested variances, as filed. Although staff has no
problem with construction of the two (2) accessory structures on the property,
staff feels there is adequate rear yard area to provide the minimum required
three (3) foot side setback. Only one (1) additional foot of setback needs to be
provided along the south (side) property line to eliminate that requested
variance. Staff believes the proposed carport/pool house building and pool
should be shifted slightly to the north to provide the minimum required side
setback and separation between structures. Staff has no problem with the
requested easement variance, as none of the public utility companies object to
the encroachment. Staff believes the proposed accessory buildings will have
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 5 (CON'T.
no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area, subject to
the required side setback being provided.
D. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested setback and easement variances,
as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on February 23,
2007 revising the application to provide the required three (3) foot side setback from
the south (side) property line. The revised application eliminated the side setback
variance. Staff recommended approval of the revised application, subject to the
carport/pool house structure being constructed to match the principal structure.
The applicant offered no additional comments.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays.
January 1? 2001
City of Little Rock
Planning &- Development
Atte: Monte Worc
723 ti'Jest..Marhdmn
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
RE: Application for Zoning Variance
44 Valley Club Circle, Litd-e Ruck, Alt 72223
Dear Vlr. Mo=:
wduut
Enclosed you will find rhe Application for a Residential Zoning Variance with supporting
materials for the property fixated at
441'alley Chub Circle
Little Rock, Aft 71223
A.L.S. Management, LLC ("ALS") is regtw% ing the following variances to allow the addition
of a msiciential swir ening pool, pool house and new carport:
1. Along the r= of the property to eonsttwr. a residential swimming; pcx)l and
pool house which will extend approximately six (6) to eight (8) feet vtto the platted 1.0' utility
easement; and
2. Along the rear of the property to construct a residential swinining pool and
gaol house which will extend approximately six (6) to eight (8) fou into the platted l0' utility
easement; and
3. Alor)g the south gids of the property to allow for the constriction of the pool
house and new carport in Elie 3' building set. back line.
Edwards Engineering, PA. he, identified the easement and setback line 'Aih Ovse
improvements ori the six (6) copies of the survey delivered with this letter.
ALS has =i,,ed clearance lemrs from each of the utilibes provided to the Pleasant Valley
Subdivision. It is with these supporting documents, we are requesting a variance from thw
requirements of the Zoning O.rdinalice.
1ZecpeC lly,
" I"e J'
David,W. . l,Jndenvood
Authorized Agent for A.L.S. Management, LLC
FEBRUARY 26, 2007
ITEM NO.: 6
File No.: Z-8173
Owner: Pleasant Valley Plaza, LLC.
Applicant: Daryl Peeples, Flake & Kelley
Address: 11220 Rodney Parham Road
Description: Lot 1-D, Pleasant Valley Place Commercial Subdivision
Zoned: C-3
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the sign provisions of Section 36-355
to allow an off -premise sign with increased area.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
Staff Update:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on February 13, 2007 requesting the
application be deferred to the March 26, 2007 Agenda. The applicant is
continuing to work out details regarding the proposed sign. Staff supports the
deferral request.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(FEBRUARY 26, 2007)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on February 13,
2007 requesting the application be deferred to the March 26, 2007 agenda. Staff
supported the deferral request.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred by a vote of 5 ayes and 0
nays.
V%-
COMMERCIAL
Specialists in Brokerage, Development and Property Management
www.flake-kelley.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Adjustm nt
FROM: Daryl Peeples Q
DATE: January 25, 2007
RE: Pleasant Valley Plaza Sign Upgrade
I represent the owners of Pleasant Valley Plaza which is a 32,000 square foot strip retail center
located on Rodney Parham Road in West Little Rock. The shopping center was built in the
1980's. Our current tenant mix includes The Toggery, Reflections, Delicious Temptations and
other soft good retailers. The retail center is located on Lot 1D and does not have frontage on
Rodney Parham Road. I have included an aerial with the shopping center outlined in yellow.
In September of 1996 we executed sign easement agreement with the owner of the lot currently
occupied by the Bank of Ozarks (Lot 1B). This easement agreement allowed us to place a
monument sign on Rodney Parham Road. A photo of the sign is attached for your review.
Because of the lack of visibility on Rodney Parham and lack of sign exposure the tenants of
Pleasant Valley Plaza desire to modify the monument sign. We are requesting a modification of
the monument sign to a marquee sign which will allow the tenants to put sign panels on sign to
identify their business and increase their exposure to the traffic on Rodney Parham. We also
desire a modification of the sign to enhance the marketability of the vacant space in the shopping
center. We currently have four 2,000 foot bays that are vacant (25% vacancy). Please review
the information included and if you have any questions or need additional items please let me
know. Included is the following:
Exhibit "A"
— Aerial photo of property
Exhibit `B"
— Plat plan
Exhibit "C"
— Photo of current monument sign
Exhibit "D"
— Sketch of proposed new sign
Exhibit "E"
— Photos of shopping center
Exhibit "F" —
Sign easement agreement
Thanks for your consideration of this request.
Enclosures
Q A ® 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 300 • Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
MAIL ADVVISORSISORS
AC''i1�11~1�1T1mpany (501) 375-3200 • (501) 374-9537
O
0
U
W
a:
W
N
0
1—
Z
W
H
cl
Q
LL
0
0
Q
0
m
a.
(i
c
0
Q
c
a�
CD
Z
Q
C!]
Q
Z
W
U)
m
Q
W
Q
Z
H
LU p 0
�_� > m
O Q W 0 W
Q � W
W
Z Uu) p 0= Q
W Q Z m z
Lj- m >
February 26, 2007
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:07 p.m.
Chairman