Loading...
pc_08 16 2007sub LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION HEARING SUMMARY AND MINUTE RECORD AUGUST 16, 2007 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being seven (7) in number. II. Members Present: Pam Adcock Lucas Hargraves Robert Stebbins Troy Laha Jerry Meyer Fred Allen, Jr. Mizan Rahman Members Absent: Darrin Williams Jeff Yates Chauncey Taylor 1 Open Position City Attorney: Cindy Dawson III. Approval of the Minutes of the July 5, 2007 Meeting of the Little Rock Planning Commission. The Minutes were approved as presented. LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION AGENDA AUGUST 16, 2007 OLD BUSINESS: Item Number: File Number: Title A. Z-8236 Akel Short-form PCD, located on the Northeast corner of Colonel Glenn and John Barrow Roads. B. LU07-18-01 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the Ellis Mountain Planning District at the north side of Kanis Road between Kirby and Asbury Roads from Mixed Office Commercial to Commercial. B.1 Z-6245-A ACME Self Storage Long-form PCD, located on the Northeast corner of Kanis and Kirby Roads. C. Z-7895-A 7th and Woodrow Short-form PCD, located on the Southeast corner of 7th and Woodrow Streets. D. Z-3371-S The Village at Brodie Creek Zoning Site Plan Review, located on the Northwest corner of Colonel Glenn Road and I-430. E. Z-8234 America Best Inns and Suites Short-form PCD, located on Mabelvale Pike at I-30, near 10200 I-30. NEW BUSINESS: I. PRELIMINARY PLATS: Item Number: File Number: Title 1. S-1580 St. Michael’s Addition Preliminary Plat, located at 12415 Cantrell Road. 2. S-1582 Kanis/Kirby Preliminary Plat, located on the Northwest corner of Kanis and Asbury Roads. Agenda, Page Two II. SITE PLAN REVIEW: Item Number: File Number: Title 3. S-1581 Broadway Ice and Vending Subdivision Site Plan Review, located on the Northeast corner of 12th and Broadway Streets. III. PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: Item Number: File Number: Title 4. Z-3150-I I-30 RV Park Long-form PCD, located on the Northeast corner of I-30 and Chicot Road. 5. Z-5535-B St. Michael’s Episcopal Church Revised Conditional Use Permit, located at 12415 Cantrell Road. 6. Z-5535-C DAV Short-form POD, located at 12415 Cantrell Road. 7. Z-6915-C Gamble Road Short-form PCD, located on the Northwest corner of Chenal Parkway and Gamble Road. 8. Z-6245-B Kanis/Kirby Rezoning from R-2 to C-3 and O-3, located on the Northwest corner of Kanis and Kirby Roads. 9. LU07-12-01 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the 65th Street West Planning District at the southwest corner of Colonel Glenn and David O. Dodd bounded by Lawson Road from Community Shopping and Office to Commercial and Mixed Office Commercial. 9.1. Z-6973-D The Village at Colonel Glenn Long-form PCD, located on the Southwest corner of Colonel Glenn and David O Dodd Road. 10. Z-7351-C Jive in Java Short-form PCD Time Extension, located at 8101 Stagecoach Road. 11. Z-7920-A Meramec Specialty Company Short-form PCD, located at 17410 Kanis Road. Agenda, Page Three III. PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: (CONTINUED) Item Number: File Number: Title 12. Z-8118-A Meramec Specialty Company Short-form PCD, located at 18220 Cantrell Road. 13. Z-8241 Scroggins Short-form PD-C, located at 3010 Winsome Drive. 14. Z-8242 Stuber Short-form PD-R, located near 600 Gamble Road. 15. Z-8243 Pittman Short-form PD-R, located on the Northwest corner of 24th and Ringo Streets. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: A FILE NO.: Z-8236 NAME: Akel Short-form PCD LOCATION: Located on the Northeast corner of Colonel Glenn and John Barrow Roads DEVELOPER: Olden Akel 8724 Colonel Glenn Road Little Rock, AR 72204 ENGINEER: Laha Engineering 6620 Baseline Road, Suite E Little Rock, AR 72209 AREA: 0.67 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 – 1 zoning lot FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: C-3, General Commercial District and R-4, Two-family District ALLOWED USES: General Commercial and Single-family PROPOSED ZONING: PCD PROPOSED USE: Convenience Store with Gas Pumps VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: 1. A waiver of the Master Street Plan requirement for right of way dedication along John Barrow Road and Colonel Glenn Road. 2. A waiver of the Master Street Plan requirement for street improvements to John Barrow Road and Colonel Glenn Road. 3. A waiver of the Landscape Ordinance and Zoning Buffer Ordinance requirements related to the required landscaping along the abutting roadways. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 2 A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site from C-3, General Commercial District and R-4, Two-family District to PCD to allow the construction of a new 50-foot by 100-foot metal building to replace two existing buildings located on the site. The present use of the site is a convenience store with fuel pumps and will remain a convenience store with fuel pumps. Presently Tracts one and three are zoned C-3, General Commercial District and Tract 2 is zoned R-4, Two-family. The existing canopy over the fuel pumps is approximately three feet from the existing right of way of Colonel Glenn Road. Any dedication of additional right of way will require the alteration of the existing canopy. It will also cause the loss of two (2) fuel pumps. This loss will create a twenty-five percent loss of the available fuel stations of the site. Based on this the applicant is seeking a waiver of any additional right of way dedication and the widening of Colonel Glenn Road and John Barrow Road. In addition the applicant is seeking approval of a waiver of the landscaping requirements along the abutting roadways. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located at the intersection of Colonel Glenn Road and John Barrow Road which is identified on the City’s Future Land Use Plan for commercial activities. The uses in the area include an auto parts store, this convenience store, a restaurant, a strip retail center containing office and commercial uses and single-family homes. There is a City of Little Rock multi-field baseball park located to the northeast of the site. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one informational phone call from an area resident. All owners of property located within 200-feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified located within 300-feet of the site, the John Barrow Neighborhood Association and Westwood Neighborhood Association were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Colonel Glenn Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial with special design standards. Dedication of right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline will be required. Per the Master Street Plan a right turn lane should be constructed at this location, which will require an additional 10 feet of right-of-way, dedicated. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 3 2. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Colonel Glenn and John Barrow Road. 3. John Barrow Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 4. Per the Master Street Plan and due to the high volume of vehicles, a right turn lane should be constructed on Colonel Glenn Road with 250 feet of stacking and a 150 foot taper. This will require the sidewalk to be reinstalled. 5. Remove existing pump island, any structure, and underground storage tanks with development. Contact the Regulated Storage Tank Division of the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality for clearance of soils prior to dedication of right-of-way. 6. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 7. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 8. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 9. Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering must approve completed plans prior to construction. 10. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. 11. Obtain a franchise agreement from Public Works (Bennie Nicolo, 371-4818) for the improvements located in the right-of-way. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available to this property. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT and T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: 1. Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 4 2. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. Fire Department: Install and place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Boyle Park Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from C-3 General Commercial to Planned Commercial Development. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: John Barrow Road is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Colonel Glenn Road is shown as a Principal Arterial with reduced design standards on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Entrances and exits should be limited on these streets to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians since they are arterials. Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of the development. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the John Barrow Neighborhood Action Plan. The Business and Commercial Goal states: “enhance the climate directed towards encouraging new businesses and commercial establishments to located in the area as well as retention of existing businesses.” August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 5 Landscape: 1. Site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. The landscape ordinance requires a nine foot (9’) wide landscape strip around the sites entirety. A variance from this minimal requirement must be obtained from the City Beautiful Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a nine foot (9’) wide land use buffer along the northern perimeter of the site next to the residentially zoned property. Seventy percent (70%) of this area is to remain undisturbed. 4. A small amount of building landscaping is required. 5. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8 % of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 ½ feet in width and 150 square feet in area. Proposed plan does not currently reflect this minimum. These islands should be evenly distributed throughout the site. 6. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern perimeter of the site. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year-around requirement. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (June 14, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating the applicant was seeking a waiver of the required street improvements and the required landscaping. Staff stated there were a number of technical issues associated with the request in need of addressing prior to the Commission acting on the request. Staff requested the applicant provide details of any proposed signage. Staff also requested the applicant provide the location of any proposed dumpster facilities and a note limiting the hours of service if limited hours were applicable. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated right of way dedication and construction of a right turn lane was required along Colonel Glenn Road per the Master Street Plan. Staff stated the existing fuel canopy and fuel tanks were located within the future right of way and the applicant would be required to relocate the fuel tanks and canopy outside the right of way and the area would require cleaning per State and Federal standards prior to the City accepting the dedication. Staff stated a 20-foot radial dedication would be required at the intersection of John Barrow and Colonel Glenn Roads. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 6 Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated a minimum landscape strip of nine feet was required around the perimeter of the site. Staff stated the landscape ordinance would require a small amount of building landscaping and a minimum of eight percent of the paved area would require interior islands. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan addressing few of the issues raised at the June 14, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has provided the location of the proposed dumpster but has not indicated any limitations for the hours of service. The applicant has indicated the required landscaping strip along the northern perimeter but has not included the required street buffer on the revised site plan. The signage is proposed to comply with signage allowed in commercial zones or a maximum of 36-feet in height and 160 square feet in area. Building signage will be limited to ten percent of the façade area. Signage is proposed on the street sides of both Colonel Glenn and John Barrow Roads. The applicant is seeking a waiver of the required landscaping along the abutting roadways. The revised site plan includes paving to the roadways as presently exists. In staff’s opinion the proposed development is a redevelopment of the site and should provide an effort to meet the typical standards of the zoning and landscape ordinances. Staff is not supportive of the waiver request. The applicant is seeking a waiver of the required right of way dedication, street improvements and radial dedication for the abutting streets. According to the applicant this requirement will cause an economic hardship due to the required relocation of the existing gas pumps. According to the applicant if this is a requirement of the City the project will be unable to move forward. Staff is not supportive of the request for a waiver of the required right of way dedication, the radial dedication or the required street improvements. These improvements are a requirement of the Master Street Plan and required of new development and redeveloped sites within the City and the Planning Jurisdiction. The Master Street Plan was designed to maximize the efficient, safe, and orderly flow of traffic through and within the City. The Plan delineates a road system to service Little Rock’s current and future needs, balancing physical constraints, the needs of individual, and the needs of the general public to produce an efficient, safe, orderly and economical road system for the citizens of Little Rock, Pulaski County and the State of Arkansas. No specific time frame has been applied to the plan, since it is designed as a “response oriented” document. The street improvements will be made through the efforts of both the public and private sector as property is developed. Among its purposes are to coordinate private and public sector development activities and to serve as a framework for funding improvements and additions to the street system, as growth demands. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 7 Staff feels the proposed development should meet the spirit of the various ordinances and is not supportive of waiving the requirements as proposed. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present and one registered supporter present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of denial of the request. Staff stated the applicant was seeking a waiver of the required street improvements and right of way dedication for the proposed development. Staff stated a waiver of the landscaping requirements was also being requested. Ms. Betty Snyder addressed the Commission on behalf of the John Barrow Neighborhood Association. She stated the association was in full support of the proposed project and City staff needed to find a way to make the development work. She stated the applicant’s had been a good neighbor and were participates in the neighborhood. She requested staff find a way to make the development work. The Commission questioned the applicant’s of the proposed redevelopment of the site and the request for the waivers. The applicant stated the right of way dedication would require relocation of the tanks. He stated in 2004 the tanks were reworked and he spent $104,000 on the tank improvements. He stated at the time of the improvements permits were obtained and no one indicated a right of way dedication would be required. He stated the right of way dedication would take in the tanks which then would have to be moved at a substantial expanse. The Commission questioned staff as to the need for the additional right of way. Staff stated the road was recently constructed by AHTD and a turn lane was not added. Staff stated based on the numbers a right turn lane was needed to facilitate traffic flow. Staff stated in this case it was an all or nothing. Staff stated the right of way was to be dedicated and the tanks relocated or the Board of Directors would have to approved or a waiver. Staff stated based on ordinance standards the turn lane was needed. Ms. Snyder pleaded with the Commission to work with the applicants to resolve this issue and make the development occur. The Commission suggested the applicant defer the item and work with staff for an alternative plan they could possibly support. There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for approval of the deferral request. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent, 1 recusal and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 8 STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing staff’s concerns related to the canopy placement and the right of way dedication. The revised site plan indicates the proposed new convenience store building will contain a total of 5,000 square feet of gross floor area. The previous site plan included the area under roof including the exterior sidewalk areas. The existing building contains 4,339 square feet for an addition of 661 square feet or 13 percent. The revised site plan includes the placement of landscaping along the northern and eastern perimeters of the site. The applicant is seeking a waiver of the required landscaping along Colonel Glenn Road. The landscaping is a requirement of the Landscape Ordinance and the Zoning Buffer Ordinance. The landscaping as indicated will require approval of a variance from the City Beautiful Commission. The building has been relocated to the north and east and the canopy has been relocated outside the future right of way. Entrance drives have been reduced to adhere to the current ordinance requirements along Colonel Glenn Road. The revised plan does not clearly identify the curb-cut along John Barrow Road. Staff recommends the curb cut be clearly identified. The applicant is seeking a waiver of the required street construction along Colonel Glenn Road. The applicant has provided a total cost estimate for the street improvements and relocation of the canopy along with installation of landscaping. The cost estimate is $170,000. The new building construction is estimated between $325,000 and $375,000. Per Section 30-284 of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances, projects other than subdivisions may require off-street improvements that constitute a substantial portion of total project cost. The public works department may determine that a project involves a financial hardship and require an in-lieu cash contribution not to exceed fifteen (15) percent of the estimated total development cost. Staff continues to have concerns with the site plan as proposed. The applicant is not proposing to construct the required street improvements and the site plan does not provide landscaping per the typical ordinance requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated they and the applicant had resolved the concerns previously raised by staff. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a revised site plan addressing the right of way dedication along John Barrow and Colonel Glenn Roads, the relocation of the canopy outside the indicated right of way and indicated areas of the site to be landscaped. Staff stated the site plan as proposed would require a waiver from the City Beautiful Commission with regard to the street buffering requirement. Staff stated the developer had agreed to August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8236 9 increase the plantings within the landscaped areas along the northern, eastern and western perimeters to one and one-half times the typical ordinance requirements. Staff also stated a raised planter bed would be located at the intersection of John Barrow and Colonel Glenn Roads, outside the right of way. Staff stated the applicant was seeking a five year deferral of the required street improvements to the abutting roadways. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent, 1 recusal (Troy Laha) and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: B FILE NO.: LU07-18-01 Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - Ellis Mountain Planning District Location: the north side of Kanis Road between Kirby and Asbury Roads Request: Mixed Office Commercial to Service Trades District Source: Joe White, White-Daters PROPOSAL / REQUEST: The applicant has requested that this item be deferred to April 12, 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 1, 2007) The applicant on February 15, 2007 requested this item be deferred to the April 12, 2007 Planning Commission Hearing. The item was placed on consent agenda for deferral. The consent agenda was approved by a vote of 9 for, 0 against with 2 absent. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant has requested that this item be deferred until the April 26 agenda. Staff is supportive of this request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 12, 2007) The Item was placed on consent agenda for deferral to April 26, 2007. By a vote of 10 for 0 against the consent agenda was approved. STAFF UPDATE: PROPOSAL / REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Ellis Mountain Planning District from Mixed Office Commercial to Service Trades District. Service Trades District represents a selection of office, warehousing and industrial park activities. The applicant has proposed a self storage facility for this site. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-18-01 2 EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-2 and C-1 and is 5.57 acres ± in size. The site has three homes in good repair facing Kanis Road, a vacant commercial building on the corner of Kanis and Kirby, two manufactured homes and several accessory buildings on it. An area east and adjacent to this application was zoned PDO Planned Development-Office in 2005 for a real estate office inside a single family house. To the east and north is zoned R-2 Single Family and has been developed with single family subdivisions. The intersection of Kanis and Cooper Orbit just west of this application is zoned C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and is currently undeveloped. To the southeast is a POD Planned Office Development for single family homes, patio homes and offices, which is in the construction phase. Directly south of this area is an expired Planned Residential Development that included some non-residential use but has not developed. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: The application area and the surrounding areas to the south and west are currently planned for Mixed Office Commercial. Beyond the Mixed Office Commercial to the west is Single Family. To the north is also planned for Single Family. To the east and southeast is planned for Suburban Office. These areas were all amended in 1999 under Ordinance 17,951 in an effort to update the Kanis Corridor. MASTER STREET PLAN: Kanis Road is shown as a Minor Arterial on the plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Kirby Road is shown as a Collector. The primary function of a Collector is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. BICYCLE PLAN: A Class III bike route is planned along Kirby Road and south across Kanis Road. A Class III bikeway is a signed route on a street shared with traffic. No additional paving or right-of-way is required. Class III bicycle route signage may be required. PARKS: According to the Master Parks Plan, the application area is within eight blocks of a park or open space. This park area is along Rock Creek, which runs between the lanes of Chenal Parkway. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-18-01 3 HISTORIC DISTRICTS: There are no city recognized historic districts that would be affected by this amendment. CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The property under review is covered under the Rock Creek Neighborhood Action Plan. The Plan’s Office and Commercial goal states: “Adopt a policy of adhering to the Land Use Plan. Amendments should be made very rarely, only with neighborhood input, and only when it can be clearly demonstrated that the amendment will enhance the quality of life in the Rock Creek Neighborhood.” ANALYSIS: The Land Use Plan along Kanis Road has been the subject of extensive study. This area of Kanis is on the edge of development in the City of Little Rock. The last major changes to take place along the Kanis corridor were the result of Ordinance 17,951 in 1999. This Ordinance changed most of the corridor to the categories that are now shown. It has taken time, but these land use categories are beginning to be utilized with the development of small offices and new residences. The Kanis area has emphasized that lower intensity uses are the most desirable for the region. The Rock Creek Neighborhood Action Plan specifically requested that the Future Land Use Plan be adhered to more closely with very limited amendments. This area has been growing almost continually over the past twenty years. The changes made by Ordinance 17,951 have been in place for eight years. A change in conditions should be identified for further modification of the plan. The application area was changed under this ordinance from Transition and Neighborhood Commercial to Mixed Office Commercial. Throughout this period of time, the use has remained mostly single family with several Planned Office Developments for this section of Kanis. A pattern of residential mixed with office uses is developing along Kanis. These land use categories need to be used as a guide for the future development of the Kanis corridor. The applicant has requested a change from Mixed Office Commercial to Service Trades District to allow a mini storage facility. This would be an increase in the intensity of the allowed uses for the site. Service Trades District provides for a selection of office, warehousing and industrial park activities that are intended to serve other office, service or industrial businesses. This land use category is ideally found near an industrial area or a major intersection with access to the interstate. The application area is not near any industrial or service businesses. The heavy truck traffic generally associated with a Service Trades District is not desirable along Kanis Road. Any changes in development along Kanis will have an impact on the amount of traffic. Service Trades District would be better on a high traffic road in the area such as Chenal Parkway. The development pattern to the north and August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-18-01 4 west is predominately single family detached houses. Most of the houses are of similar size and lot size, with a mix of large lot single family and smaller lot subdivisions. To the east is planned for Suburban Office. There are currently single family houses and single family houses that have been converted to offices in this area. These buildings and any future Suburban Office or Single Family buildings would all be on a similar scale. Service Trades District generally involves large massive structures, and those large scale structures would overwhelm its neighbors. This juxtaposition of opposing uses and massing can be detrimental to the smaller scale residential homes. This site is currently planned for Mixed Office Commercial. There are 24 acres of Mixed Office Commercial at the intersection of Kanis and Cooper Orbit, and this amendment would change 6 of those acres to Service Trades District. There is no other Mixed Office Commercial or Commercial within one mile of this site. Service Trades District is preferred at the intersection of two arterials. Kanis is a Minor Arterial and Kirby Road is a Collector. While there is a demand for more Service Trades District in west Little Rock, staff believes another site would be more suitable. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: Gibraltar Heights Pointe West Timber Ridge POA and Parkway Place Property Owners Association. Staff has received two comments opposed to the change from area residents. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes the change is not appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 26, 2007) The item was placed on consent agenda for deferral at the request of the applicant. By a vote of 10 for and 0 against the consent agenda was approved. STAFF UPDATE: There have been no changes to this request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 24, 2007) The item was placed on consent agenda for deferral to the July 5, 2007 meeting. By a vote of 6 for, 0 against, 4 absent and one vacancy the consent agenda was approved. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-18-01 5 STAFF UPDATE: There have been no changes made to this application. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The item was placed on the consent agenda for deferral. By a vote of 8 for, 0 against, 2 absent and one open position the consent agenda was approved. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant has requested that this application be amended. Whereas the original amendment was a request to change to Service Trades District, now the applicant is requesting a change from Mixed Office Commercial to Commercial on the northwest corner of Kanis and Kirby Roads. Commercial would allow a broad range of retail and wholesale activities and intensities similar to those sited in the above analysis. These activities could vary in type and scale. A change to Commercial would bring more traffic into this area. Staff recognizes that this is an arterial intersection, but feels that Mixed Office Commercial is the most intense use that would be appropriate for this location. Staff has not been shown a need to remove the requirement for some office in any development at this location nor the desirability for anything more than one-hundred percent office to be reviewed with a Planned Zoning District. Staff continues to feel that the Kanis Study findings are relevant and that the Mixed Office Commercial recommended at that time is still appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The item was placed on consent agenda for deferral to September 27, 2007. By a vote of 7 for, 0 against the consent agenda was approved. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: B.1 FILE NO.: Z-6245-A NAME: ACME Self Storage Long-form PCD LOCATION: Located on the Northeast corner of Kanis and Kirby Roads DEVELOPER: LGR Investment, LLC 404 E. Kiehl Avenue North Little Rock, AR 72020 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 5.6 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and R-2, Single-family ALLOWED USES: Neighborhood Commercial uses and Single-family Residential PROPOSED ZONING: PCD PROPOSED USE: Mini-warehouse VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. On February 15, 2007, the applicant requested a deferral of this item to the April 12, 2007, public hearing. Staff is supportive of the deferral request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 1, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated on February 15, 2007, the applicant submitted a requested for deferral of the item to the April 12, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6245-A 2 STAFF UPDATE: Staff recommends this item be deferred to the April 26, 2007, public hearing to allow staff and the applicant additional time to review the proposed development and the proposed street design to serve the development and the area. The Subdivision Committee will review the proposed site plan at their April 5, 2007, committee meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 12, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of deferral of the item to the April 26, 2007, public hearing to allow staff and the applicant additional time to review the proposed development and the proposed street design to serve the development and the area. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a request dated May 11, 2007, requesting a deferral of this item to the July 5, 2007, public hearing. Staff is supportive of the deferral request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 24, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated May 11, 2007, requesting a deferral of the item to the July 5, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the Consent Agenda for Deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 4 absent and 1 open position. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a request dated June 21, 2007, requesting a deferral of this item to the August 16, 2007, public hearing. The deferral request is to allow the applicant to file a zoning application for this site. Staff is supportive of the deferral request. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6245-A 3 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated June 21, 2007, requesting a deferral of the item to the August 16, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated the deferral request was to allow the applicant to file a zoning application for this site. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 vacant position. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a request dated July 30, 2007, requesting this item be withdrawn from consideration without prejudice. Staff is supportive of the withdrawal request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated July 30, 2007, requesting the item be withdrawn from consideration without prejudice. Staff stated they were supportive of the withdrawal request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for withdrawal. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: C FILE NO.: Z-7895-A NAME: 7th and Woodrow Short-form PCD LOCATION: Located on the Southeast corner of 7th and Woodrow Streets DEVELOPER: Stephen R. Giles, PA 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3200 Little Rock, AR 72201 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 1.29 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 zoning lot FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-3, Single-family ALLOWED USES: Single-family residential PROPOSED ZONING: PCD PROPOSED USE: Restaurant VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST/APPLICANT’S STATEMENT: The applicant is requesting a use change for this parcel of land located adjacent to Interstate 630. This establishment will be an office/commercial mix consisting of an innovative, destination, theme restaurant featuring barbeque, grilled meats and home-style southern comfort food, and a restaurant office building. The restaurant will serve food representing Arkansas’ heritage. One drive through window will be located on the west side of the restaurant accessible from Woodrow Street. Hours of operation will be the normal restaurant business hours. No late night entertainment is proposed and the predominate business will not be bar customers. This will be the first rate facility featuring a country style antique “general store” motif with a smokehouse. The entire project will be August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 2 extensively landscaped with special attention given to the existing creek that will run through a large outdoor patio area for the customers. Parking is all on-site oriented to 7th Street. The site plan orients the building where it will minimize impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood. Lighting will be subdued and restricted to the site. One of the existing houses on the block will remain and be converted into an office for the restaurant business. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains four single-family homes located along West 7th Street. The homes along Woodrow Street have been removed and a large pile of dirt is located near the southern perimeter of the site. To the south of the site is the I-630 right of way and to the north of the site are single-family homes. East of the site there are three single-family homes fronting Appianway. West of the site across Woodrow Street there are single-family homes. Other uses in the area include a vacant restaurant, office uses and office/warehouse uses all located east of the site along West 7th Street. A City of Little Rock Alert Center is located east of the site. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. The Capitol View Stifft Station Neighborhood Association, the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Association, along with all property owners located within 200-feet of the site and all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. 7th Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 2. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersections of 7th Street and Woodrow Street and at 7th Street and Appianway Street if part of this application. 3. With site development, provide the design of the street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Appianway Street including 5-foot sidewalk with the planned development. Appianway Street should be improved to a commercial standard providing 18 feet of street from centerline to back of curb. The sidewalk on Appianway Street is to be located at the property line and not at the back of curb August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 3 4. The radius at the intersection of Woodrow Street and 7th Street should be improved to a 30-foot radius and if the adjacent property is part of this application, the radius at the intersection of 7th Street and Appianway Street should be improved to 25-foot radius. The radius of the curb at Woodrow and 7th must be improved to a 30 foot radius. 5. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing streetlights as required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information regarding street light requirements. 6. Old curb cuts should be closed per Public Works detail. 7. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with Section 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan to be installed along Woodrow Street. 8. The property is located in the 100-year floodplain. A special Grading Permit for Flood Hazard Areas will be required per Section 8-283 prior to construction. 9. The finished floor of the proposed structures must be constructed to at least 1 foot above the 100-year floodplain elevation. Provide the finished floor elevation of the proposed new structure(s). The proposed office is also shown to be in the floodplain. If the existing house is to remain and be converted into the office, it must meet the modern flood regulations if the structure is improved 50% or more of the appraised value of the structure conducted by a licensed appraiser. These improvements include all improvements associated with the structure. The appraisal and cost of estimated work will be required to be submitted at time of development. The modern code would require the finished floor of the structure to be elevated to 1 foot above the base flood elevation and all supporting mechanical systems such as the HVAC to be elevated to the base flood elevation or higher. 10. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 11. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. Provide the proposed design of the detention pond showing how the site will detain. 12. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1817 (Derrick Bergfield). August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 4 13. If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 14. Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Sections 30-43 and 31-210. The minimum spacing between driveways on a collector street and commercial streets is 250 feet. The southern driveway of the drive thru is located within the AHTD right-of- way, which controls access to the property in that area. The width of a driveway must not exceed 36 feet. Per City code, driveways must be spaced 250 ft from other driveways and spaced 250 ft from the right-of-way line of an intersection. Since the property on 7th Street has less than 250 ft of frontage, the driveway must be located as far away from the intersection as possible as shown on the plan. The survey shows access can be taken to Woodrow St. from the property across AHTD right-of-way. Only one driveway is allowed on Woodrow Street to be located at least 250 ft from the 7th Street right-of-way line. 15. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 16. Coordinate design of traffic signal upgrade with proposed street improvements. Plans to be forwarded to Traffic Engineering for approval. 17. Per City code, the ditch that runs through the property should be improved to handle the 25-year storm flow. A 100-year overflow path should be provided with minimal damage to this property. Provide detailed design of the improved channel and a certification of its carrying capacity during the 25 year storm prepared by a professional engineer. Consideration should be taken of the friction loss of the ditch curvature. Provide certification that the proposed structure(s) will not be flooded by the 100 year storm event prepared by a professional engineer. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Existing sewer main on site. No construction is allowed closer than five feet of the existing sewer main. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: Approved as submitted. Center-Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Additional fire hydrant(s) may August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 5 be required in order to provide service to this property. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Route #5 – the West Markham Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the I-630 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Service Trades District for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning to allow the development of a restaurant and an office. A land use plan amendment for a change to Mixed Office Commercial is a separate item on this agenda (LU07-09-03). Master Street Plan: Woodrow Street and 7th Street are shown as Collectors on the Mater Street plan. The primary function of a Collector Street is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. Bicycle Plan: The Master Street Plan bicycle section shows a Class III bike route along 7th Street. A Class III bikeway is a signed route on a street shared with traffic. No additional paving or right-of-way is required. Class III bicycle route signage may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The Stephens Area neighborhood action plan covers this area. Their economic development goal states a need to “work with Housing and Neighborhoods to redevelop structures on the east side of Woodrow Street into new manufacturing, offices, or commercial space.” The Capitol View Neighborhood Action Plan also addresses this issue: “Rezone Woodrow between I-630 and 7th Street between Thayer and Woodrow to Quiet Office to encourage replacement of poorly maintained rental housing with small professional offices.” Landscape: 1. Site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. Site plan submitted was not to scale; therefore, a full review for minimal City code compliance cannot be done at this time. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 6 3. Street buffers/land use buffers appear deficient on all sides. A variance from both the Planning Commission and the City Beautiful Commission are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8% of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 ½ feet in width and 150 square feet in area. Proposed plan does not currently reflect this minimum. 5. If the site is larger than one acre it must be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system. 6. Preservation of the existing trees is encouraged by the City Beautiful Commission. 7. Attention to the view from Interstate 630 off ramp would be appreciated. This site is located within a scenic corridor. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (February 8, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were additional items necessary to complete the review process. Staff requested the developer locate the dumpster facility on the proposed site plan. Staff also requested any proposed signage be included on the site plan. Staff stated they were concerned with a commercial use being located adjacent to residential homes. Staff stated the site plan indicated outdoor activities and parking along West 7th Street which could impact the adjacent homes. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the indicated drives on Woodrow Street did not meet typical minimum ordinance standards. Staff stated street improvements to Appianway Street would be required with the site development. Staff requested the applicant provide the finished floor elevation of the proposed new structure. Staff stated the office was located in the floodplain. Staff stated if the structure was converted to an office use it must meet the modern flood regulations if the conversion valued the structure at 50 percent or more than the present appraised value. Staff also requested the revised site plan include areas set aside for detention. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated the site plan did not meet the minimum ordinance requirements. Staff stated a minimum of eight percent of the paved areas should be designated as landscaping. Staff also stated the minimum street buffer width was six feet nine inches. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 7 H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing few of the technical issues raised at the February 8, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has not indicated the location of the proposed dumpster facility, provided the finished floor elevation of the proposed new structure, the design of the detention pond nor does the revised site plan remove the drives along Woodrow Street. The applicant has indicated three driveway locations along Woodrow Street. The southern most drive is located within the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department right of way. The northern most drive is located 150-feet from the intersection of West 7th Street. The ordinance typically requires commercial drives be a minimum of 250-feet for the intersection with a collector street. Staff is not supportive of the drives as proposed. The revised site plan has not indicated the location for the proposed dumpster. Staff has concerns with the possible placement of the dumpster and the potential hours of dumpster service. There is an existing single-family residence located in the area labeled on the site plan as “All trees shown are existing to remain”. The site plan also includes the placement of two outdoor patio areas one located very near this single-family home. The second located within the parking area adjacent to West 7th Street. Staff has concerns with the outdoor activity being located so near this home and the possibility of negative impacts on this home. The revised site plan does not include the placement of sidewalks on Appianway Street nor the required curb radius at the intersection with West 7th and Woodrow Streets. Staff feels these items should be included on the site plan to ensure compliance with the Master Street Plan requirements for street construction. The proposed site plan has not addressed detention as required by the Storm Water Detention Ordinance. Staff has requested the applicant provide the design of the detention pond showing how the site will be detained. Staff feels detention should be addressed to ensure compliance with minimum ordinance standards. There is an existing drainage way located on the site. Per City code, the ditch that runs through the property should be improved to handle the 25-year storm flow. A 100-year overflow path should be provided with minimal damage to the property. Staff has requested the applicant provide a detailed design of the improved channel and certification of its carrying capacity during the 25-year storm prepared by a professional engineer. Staff also requested certification that the proposed structures would not be flooded by the 100-year storm also prepared by a professional engineer. Land use buffers are typically required where adjacent to single-family. Typically the buffer is required at six percent of the average depth of the property. The site plan does not include a land use buffer adjacent to the existing residences located along Appianway Street along the northern or southern perimeters adjacent to the parking areas. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 8 The site plan indicates the placement of 101 parking spaces on the site. The building is proposed with a total of 9,840 square feet of restaurant space and the office structure contains approximately 800 square feet. Based on the square footage proposed a total of 100 parking spaces would typically be required. A single sign location is indicated on the site plan near Interstate 630. The applicant has not provided details of the proposed signage. Staff recommends if the site plan is approved the signage be limited to signage allowed in commercial zones or a maximum of thirty-six feet in height and one hundred sixty square feet in area. The site plan indicates the placement of parking pulling into West 7th Street. There are single-family homes located to the north of West 7th Street which could potentially be impacted by headlights from customers entering and exiting the site. Staff feels this area should be protected by removing the spaces or by landscaping the area providing a screen to limit the impact on the adjacent homes. The site plan indicates the placement of a drive-through window but does not address the placement of an order menu board. Once again staff has concerns with the placement of the order board and potential impacts on the nearby single- family homes. Typically order boards are to be screened to limit over spilling of sound from the site. Staff would recommend if the site plan is approved and an order menu board is used the menu board be screened to minimize any potential impact on the nearby homes. In addition one of the proposed drive lanes for the drive-through facility is located within the AHTD right of way. Staff is supportive of allowing the site to develop with a restaurant and office use. Staff is not however supportive of the site plan as proposed. There are a number of issues which remain outstanding associated with the request which staff feels should be addressed prior to the Commission acting on the proposed rezoning and site plan. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of the application as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 1, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated on February 9, 2007, the applicant submitted a requested for deferral of the item to the April 12, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 9 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 12, 2007) The applicant was not present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had requested on April 10, 2007, the item be deferred to the May 24, 2007, public hearing to allow staff and the applicant additional time to resolve outstanding concerns related to the proposed site plan. Staff stated the deferral request would require a waiver of the Commission’s By-laws with regard to the late deferral request. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. A motion was made to approve the By-law waiver request. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a request dated May 11, 2007, requesting a deferral of this item to the July 5, 2007, public hearing. Staff is supportive of the deferral request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 24, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated May 11, 2007, requesting a deferral of the item to the July 5, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the Consent Agenda for Deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 4 absent and 1 open position. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing few of the previously raised concerns. The revised site plan has addressed staff’s concerns related to the location of the proposed drives. The applicant has indicated a single drive from Woodrow located near the Interstate Exit Ramp outside the AHTD right of way. The site plan also includes drives on West 7th and Appianway Streets. The indicated drives are located adequately to meet the typical minimum ordinance requirements for driveway spacing. The revised plan indicates the placement of a 20-foot radial dedication at the intersection of Woodrow and West 7th Streets. Staff recommends this radius be increased to 30-feet to facilitate traffic flows in the area. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 10 The applicant has provided the location of the proposed dumpster facility on the site plan. The applicant has located the dumpster along the southern portion of the site near a proposed parking area. The hours of service for the dumpster have not been included. Based on the proximity of residential uses to the site, staff recommends if the development is approved, the hours should be limited to daylight hours. The site plan still indicates the placement of outdoor dining with the location very near the existing single-family home located adjacent to the development. As previously indicated, this development wraps around this home leaving them very little protection from activities taking place on the site. The patio area does not indicate a screening mechanism which would prohibit direct views of the outdoor diners into the residence’s back yard. To the north of the single-family home, a parking lot and driveway are indicated. The development is proposing the utilization of a 20-foot alley to serve the parking lot located on West 7th Street. The parking has four spaces along the common lot line with the residence and the site plan does not indicate the placement of any landscaping or screening in this area. Although this is located in the rear yard area of the home, staff still has concerns of how the headlights from the automobiles will affect the livability of the residence. The site plan indicates the placement of landscaping and buffering per the minimum requirements of the landscape and buffer ordinance along the street sides. The Interstate landscape strip is deficient. Typically a 30-foot landscape strip is located adjacent to the right of way. The site plan submitted does not include any area for this required buffer. The applicant is working with staff concerning the proposed channel improvements to the existing drainage way through the site. The applicant has also indicated detailed plans for detention will be provided to staff with the submission of final plans for development. The site plan indicates the placement of 96 parking spaces along with a building containing 9,840 square feet. The ordinance would typically require the placement of 98 parking spaces to serve a restaurant development. In addition an office is proposed on the site with the office structure containing approximately 800 square feet. Two parking spaces for the office use would typically be required. The site would typically require the placement of 100 parking spaces. A single sign has been indicated on the site along the southeastern portion of the site. It appears in the location proposed the sign does not have direct street frontage since it appears there is a lot between the applicant’s property and the AHTD right of way. The sign height and area have not been indicated on the site plan as previously requested. Staff is not supportive of the placement of the sign as located on the site plan. Staff also requests the applicant limit the height and size of the sign and take into consideration the residential uses located to the east of the site. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 11 The drive through facility is located on the site plan but staff concerns have not been fully addressed. The order menu board is located along Woodrow Street accessing the front of the building for service. The screening mechanism has not been addressed. Staff recommends if the site plan is approved and the order menu board is used, the board be screened per typical minimum ordinance standards. If the board is located as proposed, the screening would be required along Woodrow Street. Staff recommends the board be incorporated into the landscaping and become an architectural element and constructed of similar construction materials as the proposed building. The applicant is seeking a five year deferral of the required street improvements to Appianway Street. Staff is not supportive of this request. Three driveways are proposed as access to the site on Appianway. Staff feels if the street is going to serve the development, street construction should take place at the time of redevelopment of the site. Staff continues to have concerns with the proposed site plan. The parking located at the intersection of Woodrow Street and West 7th Street is a major concern. This intersection is a gateway into the Capitol View Stifft Station Neighborhood and staff feels the entrance should not be marked with a hard surface parking lot. Staff feels the intersection should be softened to create an inviting entrance to the area. Staff is also concerned that the site plan only includes minimal landscaping and buffering along the roadways and is deficient along the Interstate frontage. Staff is concerned that on this site the minimums may not offer protection to the adjoining homes necessary to not impact their quality of life. The site will generate a great deal of traffic and the applicant has not indicated any mechanism to limit the intrusion of noise both from automobile traffic and customer traffic into the nearby homes located to the east along Appianway Street, the north across West 7th Street and to the west across Woodrow Street. Based on the site plan issues and concerns, staff continues to recommend denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The applicant was present. There was one registered objector present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of denial of the request. Staff stated there were a number of concerns related to the proposed site plan which they felt should be addressed for the development to fit into the neighborhood. Staff stated their concerns were related to how this development would impact the existing homes located across West 7th, Woodrow and Appianway Streets. Mr. Mark Abernathy addressed the Commission on the merits of his request. He stated he had presented the plan to the neighborhood association and received a warm response. He stated the neighborhood was excited to have such an establishment August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 12 entering their neighborhood. He stated the development was proposed utilizing the existing drainage structure within the site. He stated this would become an architectural feature as opposed to the existing overgrown drainage way. He stated he also proposed screening along the perimeters of the site. He stated it was as important to screen the development from the adjoining areas as it was to protect the homes. He stated he felt there were a number of misunderstandings by staff associated with the request. He stated he felt most of their concerns could be addressed. He stated the only thing he was not willing to change was the placement of the building. He stated to move the building to the corner did not allow his vision to be achieved. The Commission questioned if the item should be deferred to allow staff and the applicant to define the site plan. Mr. Abernathy stated he was willing to work with staff prior to the item going before the Board of Directors to address their concerns. Commissioner Williams stated he was not comfortable allowing staff to negotiate a site plan he had not seen. Ms. Ruth Bell addressed the Commission with concerns. She stated she was representing the League of Women Voters of Pulaski County and their concern was how a development fit the character of a neighborhood. She stated a parking lot at the corner was not an attractive entrance to the neighborhood. She stated she felt the details of the site plan should be addressed prior to the Commission acting on the request. There was a general discussion concerning the proposed request and the specifics of the development. The Commission suggested the applicant defer the item and work with staff to address their concerns. Mr. Abernathy agreed to the deferral. A motion was made to defer the item to the August 16, 2007, public hearing. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 vacant position. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a revised site plan indicating landscaping and screening. The revised plan has included a radial dedication at the intersection of West 7th and Woodrow Streets and indicated additional landscaping at the intersection. The revised plan includes the placement of landscaping along West 7th Street to shield the headlights of automobiles. The site plan includes screening, both landscaping and fencing, around the rear yard of the single-family residence located adjacent to the development; on the north, west and southern perimeters of the home. Building signage is proposed consistent with signage allowed in commercial zones. A single ground mounted sign is proposed along the southern perimeter, adjacent to the office with a maximum height of 36-feet and a maximum sign area of 160 square feet consistent with signage allowed in commercial zones. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7895-A 13 The overall size of the building has been reduced. The site plan indicates the placement of 98 on-site parking spaces and four parking spaces backing into Appianway Street. Staff is not supportive of the allowance of the parking backing into the street as proposed. Staff is supportive of the interior parking plan. The parking based on typical minimum parking requirements for a restaurant use is 83 parking spaces. The indicated parking is more than adequate to meet the typical minimum parking requirement. The site plan does not include the 30-foot landscape buffer along the Interstate side. The site plan indicates a 6-foot 9-inch landscape strip along the southern perimeter near the Interstate exit ramp. This reduced landscape strip will require a variance from the City Beautiful Commission prior to the item being forwarded to the Board of Directors for final action. The revised site plan has not addressed staff’s concerns related to the order menu board. The applicant has indicated they will work with staff to construct screening per the typical ordinance standards and incorporate the screening wall into the landscape as a feature of the landscaping. The applicant continues to request a deferral of the required street improvements to Appianway Street. Staff is not supportive of the deferral request. The applicant is proposing to utilize Appianway Street as assess to the site for both ingress and egress. Staff recommends the street be constructed to Master Street Plan standard to reduce any potential conflicts with customers entering and exiting the site. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had resolved their concerns related to the proposed development including screening and landscaping. Staff stated the applicant had indicated a single sign located along the southeastern perimeter of the site consistent with signage allowed in commercial zones. Staff presented a recommendation the applicant work with staff to design a sign as an architectural feature for the site. Staff stated the applicant had agreed to construct the required improvements to Appianway Street. Staff stated to their knowledge there are no remaining outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: D FILE NO.: Z-3371-S NAME: The Village at Brodie Creek Zoning Site Plan Review LOCATION: Located on the Northwest corner of Colonel Glenn Road and I-430 DEVELOPER: CGBRD 1 LLC 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 300 Little Rock, AR 72201 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates #24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72224 AREA: 81.6 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 12 FT. NEW STREET: 300 CURRENT ZONING: C-2 – Shopping Center District PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 – Ellis Mountain CENSUS TRACT: 24.05 VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: 1. A variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow advanced grading of the entire site with the development of the first phase. 2. A variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow an increased slope on selected cuts located on the site. 3. A variance from the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduced front building setback for selected lots. 4. A variance from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow lots without public street frontage. 5. A variance from the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduced buffer along the northern property line. 6. A variance from the Zoning Ordinance to allow signage without public street frontage. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 2 BACKGROUND: A preliminary plat for the subdivision of 87.137 acres zoned C-2, Shopping Center District was approved by the Planning Commission at their March 11, 2004, Public Hearing. The applicant intended to subdivide the site into four (4) lots to be marketed for C-2 commercial uses. The minimum lot size proposed was 225 feet by 225 feet or 1.162 acres for three lots which abutted Colonel Glenn Road with the bulk of the property contained in proposed Lot 4. The three peripheral lots were under separate ownership. On April 22, 2004, the Little Rock Planning Commission approved a site plan review for the development of this 81.6 acres as a shopping center and a preliminary plat to create 12 non-residential lots (previously approved Lot 4 of the I-430/Colonel Glenn Subdivision). The project consisted of 484,849 square feet of department stores, retail space and restaurant space. Parking was proposed at 2,546 parking spaces. The developer proposed to subdivide the site into nine lots and three tracts with the remaining property held by the developer. The approval allowed tenants to own property in fee. Bowman Road frontage would be improved to the minor arterial standard as required by the Master Street Plan. Right-of-way dedicated on 36th Street was required, however, a deferral of street improvements until some development occurred on the 36th Street frontage was approved. The Commission approved a variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow the grading of the site with the Phase I development. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is now seeking site plan approval for the development of 81.69 acres with a shopping center development. The site plan indicates the placement of 387,065 square feet of retail shops, a 75,000 square foot hotel, 25,000 square feet of restaurant space for a total building area of 487,065 square feet. Parking is proposed at 2,285 spaces. The applicant is seeking approval of variances from various ordinance development standards. Two variances from the Land Alteration Ordinance are being requested. One to allow advanced grading of the site with the development of the first phase and second a variance to allow an increased slope. The applicant is seeking a variance from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the creation of lots without public street frontage. The applicant is seeking a variance from the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduced buffer along the northern perimeter and the Interstate Frontage. The request also includes a August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 3 variance from the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduced building setback for the internal lots. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is tree covered, abutting I-430 and Bowman Roads. There is a creek located within the site with a portion of the site abutting West 36th Street. The site slopes to the north from Colonel Glenn Road. There are a number of non- residential uses in the area including an automobile dealership, a movie theater, a nursing school and a strip office/showroom/warehouse development. Further southwest of the site is a public school, Fair High School, located on David O Dodd Road. North of the site are single-family homes located along South Bowman Road and West 36th Street. The Church at Rock Creek is also located to the north accessed from West 36th Street. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All property owners located within 200-feet of the site, the John Barrow Neighborhood Association and the Stagecoach Dodd Neighborhood Association were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. 36th Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to 36th Street, Bowman Road and Colonel Glenn Road including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. An additional lane and improvements will be required on Colonel Glenn Road from the off ramp to the driveway. Staff recommends a deferral of construction on 36th Street for 5 years or until adjacent site development whichever occurs first. 3. Additional lanes are needed to be added in each direction of Colonel Glenn Road. These improvements are located off site, which the developer is not typically required to install. In the previous application agreements were made to make off street improvements such as increasing road lanes. 4. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 4 5. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 6. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. From previous meetings construction of all the buildings was not being proposed in the first phase. For issuance of a grading permit, construction must be imminent which is defined as the installation of a foundation or erection of a structure without unreasonable delay following land alteration activities. It is unknown at this time if a variance is needed for issuance of a grading permit. Provide a schedule of what buildings will be constructed during the Phase I grading and subsequent phases. 7. A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan will be required per Section 29-186 (e). Provide all wall heights. Provide a cross section of the proposed grading of the property including buffers to remain. 8. A maximum of 30 vertical feet of fill or excavation (3-10 foot vertical terraces or 2-15 foot vertical terraces) is permitted however additional development areas may be constructed a minimum of 150 feet in width at a slope no more than 8 percent. The maximum 30 feet of fill or excavation may again be utilized. 9. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 10. Bowman Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 11. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 12. Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering must approve completed plans prior to construction. 13. On site striping and signage plans should be forwarded to Public Works, Traffic Engineering for approval with the site development package. 14. Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code requires streetlights. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineering 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 15. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 5 16. Easements for proposed storm water detention facilities are required. 17. Hauling of fill material on or off site over municipal streets and roads requires approval prior to a grading permit being issued. Contact Public Works Traffic Engineering at 621 S. Broadway, (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. 18. Provide schedule of when street improvements be finished. 19. Coordinate design of traffic signal upgrade with proposed street improvements. Plans to be forwarded to Traffic Engineering for approval. 20. If conditions have changed from the previous applications such as building square footage and uses, submit a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed project. Contact Bill Henry, Traffic Engineering, at 379-1816 for specifics of the traffic study. The previous study showed a level of E and F and traffic would lock up at peek times. In particularly, an improvement was recommended for improving the I-430 Interchange to maintain a reasonable level of service and prevent long traffic delays. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required, with easements. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZA) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact Carroll Keatts at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Installation of public water mains will be required to serve this property. Please submit plans for the private fire line to Central Arkansas Water for review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of private fire line. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 6 project in addition to normal charges This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Install fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No comment. Landscape: 1. Compliance with the City’s Landscape and Buffer Ordinances is required. 2. The landscape ordinance requires a thirty foot wide (30) undisturbed green belt along the Interstate 430. This area is to remain completely undisturbed. 3. The zoning street buffer ordinance requires an average fifty foot wide (50) landscape area along both Interstate 430 and along Bowman Road. 4. The zoning land use buffer requires a fifty foot wide (50) land use buffer along the northern perimeter of the site next to the residentially zoned properties. Seventy percent (70%) of these buffers are to remain undisturbed. 5. The site plan reflects residentially zoned properties along the northern perimeter of the site. It is recommended the area be screened visually with vegetation; however, if the proposed vegetation does not meet this visual requirement then a six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward will be required. 6. This site is being reviewed as one project; therefore, an overall landscape plan for the sites entirety will need to be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any changes to the approved plan must be coordinated with the zoning department. Final landscaping requirements will ultimately fall upon the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 7. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to provide an approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 7 9. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this tree covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (May 3, 2007) Mr. Tim Daters was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of remaining technical issues associated with the request remaining outstanding. Staff requested the applicant provide the dimensions of all building setbacks, the maximum building height, the dimension of the landscape buffer and the location of the proposed dumpster facilities. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated street improvements would be required to the abutting streets per the Master Street Plan. Staff also stated permits would be required prior to any site grading or clearing of the site. Mr. Daters stated the developers were requesting a phased grading permit. He stated the developers were asking to grade the site in three phases with the issuance of a building permit for the first building. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated the site plan must comply with the City’s minimum landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Staff stated a 30-foot wide undisturbed green belt along the Interstate was required per the landscape ordinance and a 50-foot landscape strip was required along South Bowman Road and Interstate 430 per the zoning ordinance. Staff stated the site was being reviewed as a single development therefore landscaped plans and irrigation would be required on each lot or lease parcel as they developed. Staff stated the final landscaping requirements would ultimately fall upon the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the shopping center. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the May 3, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated the dimensions of all building setback, provided the maximum building height in the general notes section of the site plan and dimensioned the landscape buffer along the northern property line and the Interstate frontage. The applicant has not provided staff with a sketch grading and drainage plan or provided staff with the cut and fill quantities. Staff is working with the applicant to August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 8 secure these additional items. Staff will provide a recommendation to the Commission at the public hearing concerning the variance request for advanced grading. The applicant is requesting reduced setbacks for all interior lots from the front and side yard setbacks requirement. The development will be developed in a shopping center style and staff does not feel the reduced setbacks will have a negative impact on the adjoining lots. The site plan indicates a maximum building height of 45-feet. The property is presently zoned C-2, Shopping Center District which typically allows a maximum building height of 45-feet. The applicant has indicated tower elements not to exceed 60-feet. The Zoning Ordinance allow steeples, chimneys or similar ornamental structure to be constructed provided the structure does not exceed twice the height permitted in the classification. The indicated structures are within the allowable height for C-2, Shopping Center District zoning. The applicant has indicated all mechanical equipment will be roof mounted and screened from view by parapet walls. The applicant has also indicated the low architectural walls will be faced with stone or brick and conform to the general architectural theme of the center. The applicant has indicated the street buffer along Bowman Road to meet the minimum ordinance requirement. The applicant has also included landscape islands within the development to soften the impact of the on site paved area. The applicant has not included the placement of pedestrian tables to allow for safe pedestrian movement within the development. Staff would recommend pedestrian tables be added to the site to allow safe movement and connectivity throughout the site and the adjoining uses. The applicant is requesting a reduced landscape buffer along the northwestern property line. Staff is supportive of the request. The area abuts an adjoining parcel, which is bordered by a creek on the northern property line. Staff feels this area will more likely develop as a non-residential use or maintained as green space. The request also includes a reduced buffer along the Interstate frontage along the southern portion of the site. The applicant has indicated due to grades the undisturbed portion of the buffer will be difficult to maintain. Staff is supportive of reducing the buffer in this area. Based on the topography of the site and the adjoining roadways staff does not feel the reduced buffer will be visible. The proposed site plan includes the placement of 2,285 parking spaces. Based on the total retail square footage of the site 2,164 parking spaces would typically be required. The indicated parking is more than adequate to meet the minimum parking demand. The applicant has indicated signage will comply with signage as typically allowed in commercial zones and wall signage is proposed as allowed in commercial August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 9 zones per the Zoning Ordinance for percentage coverage. In addition the applicant has indicated façade signage, over-door transom signage and blade signage. The total sign area and lettering height is based on the tenant space leased by the retailer but less than typically allowed per the zoning ordinance for wall signage in commercial zones. Signage will be placed on the front of the buildings and on the side or rear of the buildings where the building has street frontage or is visible from a nearby street. The applicant has indicated three development signs. One development sign has been requested along I-430 and is proposed as forty feet in height and a sign area of three hundred square feet. The ordinance typically allows a sign thirty-six feet in height and one hundred sixty square feet in area. Staff is supportive of the increased signage area at this location. Staff recommends the sign height be measured from grade on the applicant’s site and not from the centerline of the adjoining interstate. The remainder of the development signs are proposed as a maximum of thirty-six feet in height and one hundred sixty square feet in area. The proposed signage is consistent with signage allowed in commercial zones. The applicant has indicated signage for each of the proposed lots consistent with signage allowed per commercial zones. The site plan also indicates the placement of building signage along the interior drive and along the street sides. The development is proposed as a “Life Style Center” with a main street feel. The fronts of the buildings will be located along the interior drive and the signage is necessary in this location to allow identification of the tenants. In addition the request is also to allow wall signage along the street sides. According to the applicant this signage is necessary to identify the businesses from the adjacent roadways. The applicant is requesting approval of the creation of an eight-lot plat with cross access easements in conjunction with the site plan review. Property zoned C-2, Shopping Center District typically requires a minimum lot size of five acres, except in those instances where a subdivision site plan and plat proposing peripheral lots and multiple ownership is approved by the Commission. The ordinance further states there shall be not less than three hundred feet of district frontage on at least one abutting street, whether for single or multiple building/lot development. Proposed Lots 2 - 7 do not appear to meet the minimum criteria. The lots do not have public street access. Staff does not feel the development of the lots as proposed will have any adverse impact on adjoining properties. Staff feels the serving of these lots by internal drives will lessen any potential negative impact on the adjacent roadway. Staff is supportive of the variance request. The applicant has indicated street improvements will be constructed to Bowman Road and Colonel Glenn Road. The applicant is requesting a deferral of street improvements to West 36th Street until adjacent development. Staff is supportive of this request. Staff is working with the developer for additional improvements August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 10 required in the area including construction of additional lanes under the Interstate overpass. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow advanced grading of the site. The applicant is requesting to grade the entire site with the development of Phase I of the building construction. The applicant has indicated to balance the site the advance grading is necessary to eliminate hauling of material from the site during construction of the first phase and then bringing the material back during subsequent phases. Staff is still reviewing this request. The applicant has indicated the development will have 24-hour access seven days per week. Staff is supportive of this request. The development will be a mixed use commercial development with restaurants. The site abuts commercial uses to the south and non-residential uses to the west. Staff does not feel the development with the proposed hours will have a negative impact on adjoining properties. The applicant has not provided staff with information concerning building elevations and construction materials. Staff has concerns with the massing of the buildings and the view of the rears of the structures when viewed from the adjoining roadways. Staff recommends the buildings be constructed as 360 degree buildings with the rears being treated with architectural elements to break the massing and give the appearance of a false front. Staff recommends the applicant provide additional information to ensure the development is constructed as indicated. Staff is supportive of the proposed site plan and proposed lot configuration. Staff feels the applicant has done a good job in meeting most of the minimum requirements with regard to a Zoning Site Plan Review for the proposed site with regard to landscaping, access and circulation, signage, maximum building height and parking. Although staff is supportive of the proposed concept of the development there are a number of issues staff cannot provide a recommendation on at this time. Staff is continuing to review the request for advanced grading and the necessary street improvements. Staff also recommends the applicant provide information concerning the treatment of the rears of the buildings where visible from the abutting the roadways. Staff’s recommendation is forthcoming based on these outstanding issues. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff’s recommendation is forthcoming. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 11 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 24, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated May 10, 2007, requesting a deferral of the item to the July 5, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the Consent Agenda for Deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 4 absent and 1 open position. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating they were requesting a deferral of the item to allow staff and the applicant additional time to resolve staff’s concerns related to a requested traffic study and the applicant’s request for advanced grading. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 vacant position. STAFF UPDATE: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff indicating the development of 13 lots with a site plan review for six of the proposed lots. The lots range in size from 1.87 acres to 9.91 acres. Restaurants are proposed for Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6; a hotel on Lot 4 and office/retail on Lot 12. The site plan indicates the placement of parking and landscaping to meet the typical minimum ordinance requirements. The Subdivision Committee at their July 26, 2007 meeting reviewed the revised site plan. The following indicates the additional comments offered by the Public Works staff. The remainder of the departments and agencies did not offer any additional comments on the revised plan. Public Works Conditions: Additional Comments based on revised site plan submitted on July 19, 2007 – 1. Specify if the “first major building” is this the building proposed on Lot 12 and if so what street improvements within the development and boundary street August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 12 improvements will be completed prior to the platting of Lots 1-3, 12, and 13 and the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the structure on Lot 12. 2. Provide a sketch grading and drainage plan showing proposed wall heights, finished grades, and street grades for Phase 1. 3. Due to no turn lanes and stacking provided and the distance between the proposed driveways, vehicles will have to stack in thru lanes to make left turns during peak hours. Therefore, the medians should be removed and the street designed as a 5 lane section. For more explanation, please contact Bill Henry, Traffic Engineering, at 379-1816. 4. Is the developer proposing an in-lieu payment for the thru lanes at the interchange and additional left turn lane at Bowman Road and Colonel Glenn Road or just a pledge to help with a later project? 5. Provide traffic study. In response to Subdivision Committee comments the applicant has indicated the first major building being considered for construction is the building on proposed Lot 12. The applicant has also indicated Lot 3 will take access from Lots 2 and 4 and not from the new street. The application proposes the inside lanes of the proposed four (4) lane road section with a median and a continuous left turn lane. Staff believes the medians should be removed and replaced by providing a three (3) lane section or five (5) lane section with a center left turn lane. The continuous left turn lane is not a recognized standard cross section in the AASHTO Green Book, the center lane creates confusion for drivers and by not aligning left turning vehicles, creates a sight distance problem that could negatively impact traffic safety on the proposed roadway. The applicant is seeking approval for an advanced grading permit and permission to build a road connecting Bowman Road and Colonel Glenn Road and prepare Lots 1 – 3, 12 and 13 for development. The developers are working on building plans for a two phase building development containing 24,000 square feet in total. The space will be retail consistent with the C-2, Shopping Center Zoning District classification. A hotel is discussing either part of Lots 3 and 4 or Lot 13. The developers are working to design a lot which will be acceptable to the potential user. Preliminary discussions are taking place with a substantial office and office warehouse user for a building of 80,000 – 120,000 square feet for Lot 7. An automotive dealer has indicated interest in locating three separate but related car dealerships on parts of Lots 8, 9, 10 and part of Lot 11. The developers have indicated the traffic study prepared by Peters and Associates will attempt to measure the impact of the development on the neighborhood relative to what exists today and the developers will make an appropriate contribution to fund off site costs outside the current Master Street Plan to assist in construction of additional infrastructure to serve the area. Previously the developers indicated a contribution to fund off site street improvements and the installation of traffic signals along Bowman Road and along Colonel Glenn Road. The applicant provided a traffic study to staff on Friday, August 3, 2007. Staff is continuing to review the traffic study and will provide the Commission with comments at the August 16, 2007, public hearing. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3371-S 13 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report including the staff update provided in the August 16, 2007, Planning Commission agenda. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the variance request from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow advanced grading of a portion of the site with the construction of the first significant building. Staff stated the applicant had offered the following off-site improvements to be completed in addition to the improvements required by the Master Street Plan: 1) Traffic light at Bowman Road and Bordie Creek Blvd and related necessary improvements to the intersection of new road (Brodie Creek Blvd) to satisfy the traffic requirements of Brodie Creek Blvd intersecting with Bowman Road. 2) Additional lane along Colonel Glenn from Southbound exit ramp of I-430 at Colonel Glenn to Brodie Creek Blvd intersection at Colonel Glenn and Brodie Creek Blvd. 3) Financial contribution of up to $100,000 to go toward first, a traffic light at Colonel Glenn Road and Brodie Creek Blvd, and then any or all widening of Colonel Glenn, access ramps to or from I-430 or other call for improvements that are required by ordinance. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: E FILE NO.: Z-8234 NAME: America Best Inns and Suites Short-form PCD LOCATION: Located on Mabelvale Pike at I-30, near 10200 I-30 DEVELOPER: Nykesh Patel 300 Markham Center Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 10 Otter Creek Parkway, Suite A Little Rock, AR 72210 AREA: .99 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-family District and C-3, General Commercial District ALLOWED USES: Single-family and General Commercial PROPOSED ZONING: PCD PROPOSED USE: Hotel VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking a rezoning of this .92 acre site from R-2, Single- family District and C-3, General Commercial District to PCD to allow the construction of a two story motel. The motel is proposed with 32 rooms and 34 parking spaces. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is a graveled lot fronting Mabelvale Pike. There are commercial uses located adjacent to the site accessed from the I-30 Frontage Road. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: E (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8234 2 Uses in the area include a hotel, a restaurant, motorcycle sales, a liquor store, and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department offices. Immediately north of the site is a paved parking lot serving the Highway Department and a Highway Department maintenance building. The I-30 Access Road is one-way adjacent to the site. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All owners of property located within 200-feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified located within 300-feet of the site, the Town and Country Neighborhood Association and Southwest Little Rock United for Progress were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Mabelvale Pike is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 2. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Mabelvale Pike including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. 3. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 4. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 5. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 6. Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering must approve completed plans prior to construction. 7. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: E (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8234 3 E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available to this property. Capacity Contribution Fee charge maybe required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT and T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: 1. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. 2. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. 3. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. 4. Please submit two copies of the plans for the private fire line, if applicable, to Central Arkansas Water for review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of private fire line. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. 5. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Fire hydrants maybe required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located on CATA Bus Route #17 – the Mabelvale- Downtown Route. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: E (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8234 4 F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Geyer Springs West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from C-3, General Commercial and R-2, Single Family to Planned Commercial Development to allow the construction of a hotel containing 36 rooms including a manager’s residence. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Mabelvale Pike is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Collector Street is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: A Class III bike route is shown along Mabelvale Pike according to the Master Street Plan bicycle section. A Class III bikeway is a signed route on a street shared with traffic. No additional paving or right-of-way is required. Class III bicycle route signage may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the 65th Street West Neighborhood Action Plan. The Land Use and Zoning goal states, “Ensure that non residential development and multi family development in the area be limited to areas currently reserved for such uses on the Future land Use Plan or in areas currently zoned for non residential and multi family uses.” Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum nine foot (9’) wide landscape strip around the site’s perimeter. 3. A small amount of building landscaping is required. 4. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8 % of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 ½ feet in width and 150 square feet in area. The proposed plan does not currently reflect this minimum. 5. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a nine foot (9’) wide landscape buffer along the northern and eastern property lines next to the residentially zoned properties. Seventy percent of this area is to remain undisturbed. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: E (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8234 5 6. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern and eastern perimeters of the site. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year-around requirement. 7. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on tree covered sites. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (June 14, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of technical issues associated with the request in need of addressing prior to the Commission acting on the request. Staff stated the parking as indicated caused conflicting traffic movements by backed into the access easement. Staff questioned the location of the proposed dumpster facility and questioned if the hours of service would be limited to daylight hours. Staff stated the site plan should include the location and total area of all proposed signage including building and ground mounted signage. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated street improvements to Mabelvale Pike would be required at the time of development. Staff also stated a grading permit would be required prior to any clearing on the site. Staff stated since the site was less than one acre the storm water detention ordinance did not apply to development of the site. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated the site plan did not include the required street buffer along Mabelvale Pike. Staff also stated the site plan did not include the required interior landscaping or the required building landscaping. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan addressing most of the issues raised at the June 14, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has provided the proposed building elevations, included the August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: E (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8234 6 proposed signage plan and removed the parking space backing into the access easement. The revised site plan includes right of way dedication and construction of street improvements per the Master Street Plan. The revised site plan does not indicate sufficient building landscaping as required per the Landscape Ordinance. Minimum street buffering per the Zoning Ordinance is shown. The site plan appears to be very close on the required interior landscaping. The Landscape Ordinance typically requires a minimum of eight percent of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 ½ feet in width and 150 square feet in area. Any variance from this typical minimum standard will require approval from the City Beautiful Commission. The revised plan does not include the placement of building landscaping. The landscape strip must be a minimum of three feet in width. It appears the applicant could relocate the building and reduced the pavement to meet this typical minimum requirement. The Zoning Ordinance typically requires a nine foot (9’) wide landscape buffer along the northern and eastern property lines next to the residentially zoned properties. Seventy percent of this area is to remain undisturbed. The revised site plan is indicated with this minimum landscape strip. Typically a six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along these perimeters to screen the residentially zoned or used property. The applicant is seeking relief of this typical requirement. Although the adjoining properties are zoned residentially the uses are non-residential including a hotel and a paved parking lot. Staff is supportive of this request. The site plan includes the placement of 32 rooms and 34 parking spaces. Typically a hotel use would require the placement of one parking space per guest room, plus an additional ten percent of the total of all parking spaces is required for developments larger than twenty rooms for employees and non-guests patronizing meeting rooms, restaurants and other facilities. The site plan as proposed would typically require the placement of 35 parking spaces. The site plan does not include the placement of signage. Staff recommends a single ground mounted sign be allowed along Mabelvale Pike. The sign should be consistent with signage allowed in commercial zones or a maximum of 36-feet in height and 160 square feet in area. Building signage is proposed on the front of the building facing into the parking lot and on the street side facing Mabelvale Pike. The building is proposed as a two story building with a maximum height of 36-feet. The building is proposed constructed with the lower portion of the wall bricked and the remaining wall constructed of dryvit or a stucco material. The roof will be a non-reflective roofing material. The site plan includes the placement of an office, laundry and living quarters. A food preparation area is indicated along with a storage room. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: E (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8234 7 The food preparation area will consist of heating of breakfast foods such as items typically served as continental breakfast foods. The setbacks as proposed do not meet typical setbacks per the commercial zoning district. Typical setbacks include a 25-foot front and rear yard setback and 15-feet along the northern perimeter. The site plan as indicated allows a 9-foot 8-inch setback along the north and a 14-foot front yard and a 15-foot rear yard setback. Per the Planned Zoning District Ordinance a minimum of ten to fifteen percent of the PCD area shall be designated as landscaped open space not to be used for streets or parking. The applicant has not provided staff with the total area designated as landscape open space. The site plan as indicated does not appear to meet this typical minimum requirement. Staff is not supportive of the proposed request. The site plan includes inadequate parking, setbacks less than typical minimum ordinance standards and landscaping very near or less than the typical minimum ordinance requirement. Staff feels the site is being developed to maximize development with buildings and parking and the developer is paying little attention to site design. Staff feels the overall intensity of the development should be reduced to allow adequate parking, setbacks and sufficient landscaping. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated August 15, 2007, requesting a deferral of this item to the September 27, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated the deferral request would required a waiver of the Commission’s By-laws with regard to the late deferral request. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for a waiver of the By-laws with regard to the late deferral request. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 1 FILE NO.: S-1580 NAME: St. Michael’s Addition Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Located at 12415 Cantrell Road DEVELOPER: St. Michael’s Episcopal Church 12415 Cantrell Road Little Rock, AR 72223 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 6.56 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-family PLANNING DISTRICT: 1 – River Mountain CENSUS TRACT: 42.01 VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: 1. A variance from the Highway 10 Design Overlay District to allow the creation of a lot with less than the two (2) acre minimum lot size (Lot 2 - 1.61 acres). 2. A deferral of the Master Street Plan requirement for the placement of a sidewalk along Cantrell Road until adjacent sidewalk placement. 3. A variance from the Highway 10 Design Overlay District to allow a reduced building line around the existing structure. BACKGROUND: On January 14, 1992, the Little Rock Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for St. Michael’s allowing for the construction of a church on a 4.3 acre site. On May 3, 2004, a revision to the Conditional Use Permit was approved by the Little Rock Planning Commission to allow the previously approved area to be expanded by 2.2 acres. The 2.2 acre area included two single-family homes located on a separate parcel. The acquisition of the second parcel made possible a less dense site design. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1580 2 The parking lots and building footprints were “broken up” so as to make better use of the topography and to provide a better and more natural site development. The two houses were to remain single-family homes for the immediate future. Future uses included a parsonage or caretaker’s house, conversion of the structures into classroom or office space as a part of the church program, a youth or retreat center or removed and replaced with a distant third or fourth phase of program development which would require return to the Commission. The homes are presently vacant. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval for the creation of two lots from this 6.56 acre parcel. The plat includes several variances including a variance from the Master Street Plan to allow a deferral of the sidewalk placement on Highway 10 and variances from the Highway 10 Design Overlay District to allow a reduced lot size and a reduced front building line. The lots range in size from 1.61 acres to 4.97 acres. The proposed plat indicates a reduced building line adjacent to Cantrell Road. The building line is proposed around the existing structure located along the eastern perimeter. The applicant is seeking approval of a revision to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit (Z-5535-B) and approval of a rezoning to POD for a portion of this site (Z-5535-C) as separate items on this agenda. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a church and two vacant single-family homes. There is a significant grade difference between the church and the homes with the homes sitting on top of a ridge. Access to the homes is presently from Cantrell Road through a shared driveway. The church has a separate drive extending from Cantrell Road. Other uses in the area included multi-family, commercial and office uses. There is a large tract of undeveloped property to the northeast previously approved as a PRD for condominium housing. To the northwest are office uses and a recently approved health studio and spa. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All owners of property abutting the proposed site along with the Pankey Community Improvement District, the Piedmont Property Owners Association, the Pleasant Forest Property Owners Association and the Walton Height-Candlewood Property Owners Associations were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Cantrell Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial. Dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline will be required. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1580 3 2. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with Section 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. 3. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 4. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 5. Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Sections 30-43 and 31-210. The lots must share a single driveway access. The width of driveway must not exceed 36 feet. The eastern driveway must be removed per City code. 6. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineering at 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easement for Lot 2. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. Additional fire hydrant(s) may be required. Contact the Fire Department having jurisdiction to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located on the Highway 10 Express Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No comment. Landscape: No comment. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1580 4 G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the proposed preliminary plat indicating there were additional items necessary to complete the review process. Staff requested the applicant indicate the front building line, the zoning classification within the plat boundary and of abutting areas and provide the source of title of the landowner in the general notes section of the site plan. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated dedication of right of way would be required along Cantrell Road. Staff also stated the existing drive serving Lot 2 would require removal per City code. Staff stated streetlights would be required prior to platting or the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated the front building line, the zoning classification within the plat boundary and of abutting properties and provided the source of title of the landowner. The applicant has also indicated right of way dedication per the Master Street Plan and provided a note indicating the drive serving Lot 2 will be removed. The proposal includes the creation of a two (2) lot plat for this 6.56 acre parcel. There are several variances associated with the request two (2) of which are related to the Highway 10 Design Overlay District. The Highway 10 Design Overlay District typically requires a minimum lot size of two (2) acre and a front building line of 100-feet. Lot 2 is proposed with a minimum lot size of 1.61 acres. The front building line is indicated less than 100-feet due to the location of the existing residential structure. After the dedication of right of way the existing home encroaches into the 100 foot front building setback by a few feet. Staff is supportive of the variance request. Staff does not feel the reduced lot area nor the reduced front building line will significantly impact the development or the area. The plat includes a variance from the Master Street Plan to allow a deferral of the sidewalk placement along Highway 10 until adjacent sidewalk construction. Staff is supportive of this request. Presently there are large gaps in the sidewalk in this area. The sidewalk has not been placed adjacent to the apartment development to the east of this site nor has the sidewalk been placed in front of the commercial development to the west of this site. Staff does not feel the deferral of the sidewalk placement will significantly impact the development or the area. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1580 5 Staff is supportive of the preliminary plat request. Although there are variances from the Highway 10 Design Overlay District and a deferral of the sidewalk placement staff does not feel the creation of the plat and the associated variances and deferral will significantly impact the development or the area. To staff’s knowledge there are no remaining outstanding technical issues associated with the request. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances from the Highway 10 Design Overlay District to allow a reduced lot size and a reduced front building line. Staff recommends approval of the requested deferral of the Master Street Plan requirement for sidewalk placement along Cantrell Road. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the requested variances from the Highway 10 Design Overlay District to allow a reduced lot size and a reduced front building line. Staff also presented a recommendation of approval of the requested deferral of the Master Street Plan requirement for sidewalk placement along Cantrell Road. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: S-1582 NAME: Kanis/Kirby Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Located on the Northwest corner of Kanis and Asbury Roads DEVELOPER: LGR Investment, LLC 404 E. Kiehl Avenue North Little Rock, AR 72020 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 5.6 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and R-2, Single-family PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 – Ellis Mountain CENSUS TRACT: 42.10 VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: Ordinance No. 17,442 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on April 1, 1997, rezoned a portion of this site (0.34 acres) from R-2, Single-family to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval for the creation of a two lot plat with Lot 1 utilizing C-3, General Commercial District uses and Lot 2 utilizing O-3, General Office District uses through a rezoning request as a separate item on this agenda (Z-6245-B). Lot 1 is proposed containing 3.49 acres and Lot 2 containing .97 acres. A front building line of 25-feet has been indicated on the street sides of the proposed plat. Upon development all street improvements will be constructed in accordance with the Master Street Plan. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1582 2 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a number of residences both site built and manufactured homes and a building constructed for a commercial use a number of years ago now being used as a residence. The property to the north on Asbury Road is zoned PD-O and is currently being used as an office for Davis Forestry. To the north on Kirby Road, the property is zoned R-2 with a CUP which allows a manufactured home on the property. To the southeast is a newly developing single-family subdivision with attached and detached residential structures. To the west of the site is a vacant property currently zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District. Northwest of the site is a property zoned PD-R which was approved to allow the construction of attached single-family homes. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. The Parkway Place and the Gibralter Heights/Point West/Timber Ridge Neighborhood Association, all owners of property located within 200 feet of the site and all residents, who could be identified, located within 300 feet of the proposed development were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Kanis Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. Per the Master Street Plan an additional 10 feet of right-of-way is required to be dedicated for the right turn lane onto Kirby Road. 2. Asbury Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 3. Kirby Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 4. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Kanis Road and Kirby Road. 5. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Kanis Road and Asbury Road. 6. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Kanis Road including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 33 feet from centerline. A right turn lane should be installed at the Kanis Road-Kirby Road intersection. The right turn lane should be provided with 150 feet of stacking distance and 100 foot taper. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1582 3 7. With site development, provide the design of the street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvements to Kirby Road including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 18 feet from the centerline. 8. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Asbury Road including 5-foot sidewalk with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 18 feet from centerline. 9. The future driveway on Kanis Road must align with Woodlands Edge Trail. If future driveways are proposed on Kanis Road they must be right in/right out only and meet the City driveway spacing criteria. 10. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 11. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. 12. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 13. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineering 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 14. Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering must approve completed plans prior to construction. 15. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easement. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1582 4 Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. On-site fire line(s) and additional fire hydrant(s) will be required in order to provide service to this property. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire systems. This development will have minor impact on existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No comment. Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were few outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Staff requested the applicant provide the source of title of the landowner, the building setback for the proposed lots and the total lot area for each of the proposed lots. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the abutting streets would require construction to Master Street Plan standards at the time of final platting. Staff also stated a right turn lane would be required at the intersection of Kanis and Kirby Roads. Staff stated future drives along Kanis Road would be required to align with Woodlands Edge Trail. Staff noted streetlights would be required prior to final platting. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1582 5 H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised preliminary plat to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has provided the source of title of the landowner, the building setback and the total lot area for each of the proposed lots. The site plan indicates a right turn lane will be added at the intersection of Kanis and Kirby Roads and future drives will align with Woodlands Trails. The revised plat indicates the placement of a 25-foot front building line abutting the two streets as typically required by the proposed zoning classifications. A note indicates the remaining setbacks will comply with the proposed zoning classification. The plat is proposed with Lot 1 containing 3.49 acres and Lot 2 containing .97 acres. Lot 1 is proposed for C-3, General Commercial District zoning and Lot 2 with O-3, General Office District zoning through a rezoning request as a separate item on this agenda (Z-6245-B). Per the proposed zoning classification the minimum lot size allowed is 14,000 square feet or 0.32 acres. The lot sizes proposed are more than adequate to meet the typical minimum lot size for the proposed zoning. Staff is supportive of the proposed preliminary plat application. The plat as proposed follows the proposed zoning lines and fully complies with typical minimum ordinance requirements for the existing and proposed zoning classification. Staff’s support of the proposed preliminary plat should not be construed as support for the proposed rezoning or the Future Land Use Plan amendment. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to compliance with the comment and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: S-1581 NAME: Broadway Ice and Vending Subdivision Site Plan Review LOCATION: Located on the Northeast corner of 12th and Broadway Streets DEVELOPER: Best Ever Group, Inc. 1725 N. Spruce Street Little Rock, AR 72207 ARCHITECT: Terry Burruss, Architects 1202 South Main Street, Suite 230 Little Rock, AR 72202 AREA: 0.688 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: UU, Urban Use District PLANNING DISTRICT: 8 – Central City CENSUS TRACT: 1 VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking a site plan review for the placement of an additional structure on the site to house vending equipment. A free standing, automated ice machine that has the capability to produce fresh, fast and convenient ice on demand, is proposed along with a walk-up vending machine for products such as drinks, sandwiches and snacks. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a closed automotive detail shop, automatic carwash facility and mechanics bay. To the south is a self-serve carwash. Located on the same block is a heat and air business with a large warehouse and office uses. To the north is a drive-in restaurant. To the east and southeast are commercial uses including a copy center a restaurant use and plant sales. To the west of the site is a cemetery. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1581 2 C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one informational phone call from an adjacent property owner. All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site along with the East of Broadway Neighborhood Association and the Downtown Neighborhood Associations were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Provide survey showing centerlines of adjacent streets. Broadway Avenue is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial with special design standards. Dedication of right-of-way to 40 feet from centerline will be required. 2. Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plans specifies that 12th Street for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. Provide survey showing centerline. 3. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Broadway Avenue and 12th Street. 4. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 5. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 6. The curb radius at Broadway Avenue and 12th Street should be improved to a 20 foot radius. 7. Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Sections 30-43 and 31-210. The width of driveway must not exceed 36 feet. The western driveway on West 12th Street should be removed. Only a single driveway will be allowed on Broadway Avenue. 8. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 9. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1581 3 E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Existing sewer main located under the existing structure. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. Fire Department: Place and install fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Routes #14 – The Rosedale Route and #15 – The 65th Street Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No comment. Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. The zoning street buffer requires an average eighteen foot (18’) wide street buffer and in no point be less than half along Broadway Avenue and along Spring Street. 3. The zoning street buffer requires six foot nine inch wide (6’-9”) street buffer and in no point be less than half along West 12th Street. 4. The landscape ordinance requires a nine foot wide landscape strip around the sites entirety. There should be no hardscaping located within this minimal area. This site is located within the designated mature area of the City; therefore, this can be reduced to six foot, nine inches (6’-9”) where nine foot is a hardship. A variance from this minimal amount will require the approval of the City Beautiful Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The landscaping ordinance requires a small amount of building landscaping between all parking areas and the buildings. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1581 4 6. Street trees are required. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Staff requested the applicant provide building elevations for the proposed structure and provide the proposed construction materials. Staff also requested the applicant provide details of the proposed vending operation. Staff stated lighting must be low level and directed downward and into the site. Staff noted the site was located in the UU zoning district which had specific development criteria. Staff requested the applicant provide striping on the existing paved area to designate customer parking. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated right of way dedication was required at the intersection of West 12th Street and Broadway Avenue. Staff also stated the developers would be required to repair and/or replace any broken curb, gutter or sidewalk prior to occupancy. Staff stated the driveway locations and widths did not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of the existing ordinances. Staff stated the western drive on West 12th Street should be removed. Only a single drive would be allowed on Broadway Avenue. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated street trees would be required along the roadways. Staff also stated street buffers would be required along West 12th Street and Broadway Avenue. Staff stated presently there was no landscaping indicated on the site plan. Staff also stated a small amount of building landscaping would be required. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing a number of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated the site will contain a walk-up vending service for sale of ice and typical vending products including drinks, snacks and sandwiches. The revised site plan indicates the placement of a 9-foot landscape strip along the northern perimeter and a 6-foot 9-inch landscape strip along West 12th Street adjacent to the area proposed for the additional building. A note indicates building landscaping will be installed adjacent to the new structure. The site plan indicates the ice plant will be screened with the new structure. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1581 5 The site plan does not include striping of the parking lot area to designate customer parking, the removal of drives to comply with the typical ordinance requirements nor has the applicant provided building elevations or proposed construction materials. The site plan indicates the hours of operation from 6:00 am to Midnight seven days per week. Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Section 30-43 and 31-210. Per the Master Street Plan, the minimum driveway spacing on a principal arterial street is 300 feet and 150 feet from the property line. Since this property cannot meet those standards only one driveway is allowed on Broadway Avenue. Presently there are two drives indicated on Broadway Avenue. The site plan as indicated renders the existing one story brick structure unusable. According to the applicant the carwash facility will not operate while the vending operation is in operation on the site. The applicant has indicated the vending operation is a temporary use and will be removed from the site once a permanent use has been identified. Staff is not supportive of the request. There are a number of outstanding issues associated with the request. The development is located within the UU, Urban Use Zoning District which was established to assure the continuation of development consistent with traditional urban form. The district was established in order to help create a compact, dense, distinguishable core area. Broadway Avenue was one of the six streets within the Downtown corridor network as defined by the Downtown Little Rock Framework for the Future. Objective One as stated in the Downtown Little Rock Framework for the Future, the Downtown urban form should be protected by requiring structures be built to the street with street level activity and visual connection between the street and interior. The site plan as proposed does not meet this criteria. In staff’s opinion the development does not meet the intent of the UU Zoning District nor the recommendations of the Downtown Little Rock Framework for the Future. Also with the outstanding issues associated with the request staff does not feel the development as proposed is a proper development for the site. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated August 15, 2007, requesting a deferral of this item to the September 27, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated the deferral request would required a waiver of the Commission’s By-laws with regard to the late deferral request. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1581 6 There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for a waiver of the By-laws with regard to the late deferral request. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 4 FILE NO.: Z-3150-I NAME: I-30 RV Park Long-form PD-C LOCATION: Located on the Northeast corner of I-30 and Chicot Road DEVELOPER: Dave and Mary Pierce P.O. Box 6298 Sherwood, AR 72124 ENGINEER: The Holloway Firm Bob Holloway 200 Casey Drive Maumelle, AR 72113 AREA: 5.811 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: C-4, Open Display District ALLOWED USES: Outdoor sales and commercial uses PROPOSED ZONING: PD-C PROPOSED USE: RV Park VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST/APPLICANT’S STATEMENT: The proposal includes the development of 5.81 acres with 145 RV parking spaces. The development is proposed in three phases. A single entry to the park is proposed off Chicot Road to provide a controlled entry. The exit is on the frontage road along Interstate 30. The control center and office for the business will be at the northwest corner of the site where the only services offered will be a laundry facility and propane refilling station. The park is unlike a KOA in that it is simply a location to park the RV and the accompanying vehicle. It does not provide on site recreational facilities like long term camper parks. All utilities for August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 2 the park will be underground with the connections all in a concrete island such that they provide minimum difficulty while attaching to the RV’s. The applicant has indicated a desire to retain on-site trees where not located within the proposed parking spaces. The driveways are proposed with asphalt and concrete aprons at the entrance and exits, but the parking itself will be graveled with a light colored chat with the exception of the designated landscape areas. Since most of the lot will be gravel, it will provide for substantially easier maintenance operation, minimize storm water detention requirements and provide a clean and more easily maintained site. The site will be used for overnight stays, or small extended stays for recreational purposes by family visitations, shopping, athletic events or visits to the Clinton Library. Sewer service will be provided by Little Rock Wastewater Utility since a gravity sewer line is located on site and larger water lines are located along Chicot Road and the I-30 Frontage Road. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is a wooded site located just east of the Chicot/I-30 Overpass. To the north of the site is an apartment development and to the east is a church. West of the site is a property containing a warehouse building which was formerly used as a lumber company. Further west is an office use and an apartment development and a mini-warehouse development. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several phone calls from area residents. All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified, located within 300 feet of the proposed development, the South Brookwood Neighborhood Association, Southwest Little Rock United for Progress and the Town and County Neighborhood Associations were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Chicot Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 2. The driveway into the development from Chicot Road should be paved with curb and gutter and at least 26 feet from back of curb to back of curb to the eastern slot access drive. The driveway entrance off the I-30 frontage road should be paved with curb and gutter and at least 26 feet back of curb to back of curb to the slot access drives. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 3 3. With site development, provide the design of the street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Chicot Road with the planned development. Asphalt pavement should be provided 18 feet from the centerline and concrete to the right of way line with curb and gutter, and access ramps crossings. 4. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 5. The driveways within the development should be constructed to at least 20 feet in width of asphalt pavement. 6. The parking slots should be angled to allow vehicles to back into slots. This would require the slot driveways to be one way. 7. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. If the applicant desires to clear Phase 2 and/or 3 with Phase 1 a variance from the Land Alteration Regulations is required. 8. All radiuses should be sufficient for bus or WB-40 turning movements. Provide revised plan. 9. In accordance with Section 31-210 (h)(12), access driveways running parallel to the street shall not create a four-way intersection within 75 feet of the edge of pavement on the I-30 access road. 10. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. The detention is shown on the south side of the property. 11. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 12. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Existing sewer main on site. Sewer is available for the project. Sewer connection for private system serving RV Park must be approved by Little Rock Wastewater Utility prior to the start of construction. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 4 Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding the size and location of the water meter. Additional fire hydrant(s) may be required. Contact the Fire Department having jurisdiction to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s) and private fire line. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZA) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact Carroll Keatts at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Geyer Springs West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Commercial development to rezone the site from C-4, Open Display District to allow the placement of an RV Park on the site containing 145 stalls. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Chicot Road is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Collector Street is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: A Class III bike route is shown on the Master Street Plan bicycle section along Chicot Road. A Class III bikeway is a signed route on a street August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 5 shared with traffic. No additional paving or right-of-way is required. Class III bicycle route signage may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the 65th Street West Neighborhood Action Plan. The Land Use and Zoning goal states: “Non Residential developments within the neighborhood should be low volume traffic generating businesses” and “Encourage non residential uses continue to be located along University Avenue and I-30 and not infiltrate into the neighborhood.” Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. A nine-foot minimum landscape strip will be required along the access drive on the northern perimeter. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is also required in this area. 3. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a forty foot wide (40’) land use buffer along the remainder of the northern perimeter of the site next to the residentially zoned property. Seventy percent (70%) of this buffer is to remain undisturbed. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year-around requirement. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is also required. 4. The landscape ordinance requires the placement of a landscape strip along the eastern and western perimeters of the site a minimum of nine feet in width. 5. The landscape ordinance requires the placement of a 30-foot perimeter planting strip adjacent to I-30. 6. The zoning buffer ordinance requires an average of forty foot (40’) wide street buffer and in no case less than the thirty foot (30’) required by landscape ordinance. 7. Vehicular use areas are required to be landscaped at a minimum of eight percent of the interior wheeled area. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8 % of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 ½ feet in width and 150 square feet in area. These islands should be evenly distributed throughout the site. 8. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 6 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to provide an approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. 10. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on tree covered sites. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented the item stating there were a number of outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Staff stated the site plan did not include any outdoor livability. Staff stated the PUD ordinance typically required a minimum of ten to fifteen percent of the site area be designated as landscaped open space and not be used as streets or parking. Staff also stated the request included the placement of gravel parking pads for the RV’s. Staff stated the ordinance typically required all wheeled areas to be constructed with a hard surface material. Staff questioned the length of time visitors would be allowed to stay at the site. Staff also requested the applicant provide the location of the dump station or define how sewer service would be handled. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the parking slots should be angled to allow vehicles to back into slots. Staff stated this would require the drives to be one-way drives. Staff stated the internal drives should be constructed to a minimum width of 20-feet. Staff also stated if Phases II and III were proposed for clearing with the development of the Phase I a variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance would be required. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated a 30-foot perimeter landscape buffer was required along the I-30 Frontage Road per the Landscape Ordinance. Staff stated the zoning buffer ordinance would typically require the placement of a 40-foot street buffer in this area and in no case less than one-half or 20-feet. Staff stated the vehicular use areas were required to be landscaped with a minimum of eight percent of interior landscaping within interior landscape islands a minimum of seven and one-half feet and 150 square feet in area. Staff stated a landscape plan would be required prior to the issuance of a building permit and an automatic irrigation system would be required to water landscaped areas. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 7 H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 27, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated each of the proposed parking stalls will have access to City sewer service, the maximum length of stay is 30-days and the site will have a 24-hour attendant. The site plan does not include angled parking as suggested by staff. According to the applicant the width of the stalls and drive lanes are adequate to maneuver a vehicle into the stall as proposed. The buffer along the northern perimeter has not been indicated at the 40-foot minimum landscape strip as typically required per the zoning buffer ordinance and the 9-foot minimum landscape strip along the eastern and western perimeters has not been included. The interior landscaping, as typically required by the landscape ordinance, has not been included. Screening and buffering have been noted by the applicant in the revised cover letter but have not been noted on the site plan. According to the applicant a wooden fence is located along the northern perimeter of the site on an adjacent property. The ordinance typically requires the placement of screening by the more intense use and although there is screening in place this does not relieve the applicant of the screening requirement. A chain link fence is located along the eastern and western perimeters. The cover letter states a living screen would accomplish any screening requirements by the placement of hedges and trees for a more suitable perimeter treatment in these areas but has not been indicated on the site plan. The site plan does not include any outdoor living space in parks or community common areas. According to the applicant these amenities have not been provided since the site is not a long term stay facility. The site is proposed for larger units and a clientele that does not require a large common open space. According to the applicant’s revised cover letter a substantial number of existing trees (200+) will remain on the site. The revised site plan does not identify the trees to remain on the site nor has the applicant provided a tree survey. The Planned Zoning District Ordinance typically requires a minimum of ten to fifteen percent of the site to be common open space and green space. The site plan does not include this typical minimum requirement. The revised site plan includes the placement of 145 parking stalls with a minimum width of 22-feet and a maximum depth of 50-feet. Each of the stalls is proposed with areas of green space and a location for tow vehicle parking. Each of the proposed stalls will have a utility pedestal connection with access to water, sewer and electrical. Central Arkansas Water will provide water service and Little Rock Wastewater Utility will provide wastewater service. The lot is proposed with parking lot lighting to be mercury vapor shoebox type lighting with a maximum pole height of 20-feet. The development is proposed in three phases. The first phase will involve the construction of the access drive from Chicot Road, the office and laundry facility August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 8 and 48 parking stalls along with the drive serving the stalls. Phase II will contain 45 parking stalls along with the service drive and Phase III will include 52 parking stalls and service drive. Grading is proposed with each phase of development therefore a variance to allow advanced grading of the subsequent phases is not being requested. The office facility is proposed as a 14-foot by 40-foot structure and the laundry as a 10-foot by 16-foot structure. The trash receptacle is located adjacent to the office and laundry facility with the hours of service limited to daylight hours. A screening fence will be provided per the typical ordinance requirements. Signage is proposed along the I-30 frontage road and along North Chicot Road. The signage is proposed as typically allowed in commercial zones or a maximum of 36-feet in height and 160 square feet in area. Directional signage will also be utilized along the I-30 Frontage Road to direct patrons to the entrance to the development along North Chicot Road. The applicant has indicated the customers will be allowed a maximum stay of 30 days and the maximum number of occupants per vehicle is four. The vehicle must be moved from the site a minimum of 15 days before the unit can return for an additional 30 day stay. All drives are proposed constructed as a hard surface material. The driveway off Chicot Road is indicated as a 22 foot wide drive with no curb and gutter. The driveway should be paved with curb and gutter to a width of at least 26 feet from back of curb to back of curb and constructed for the expected wheel loads. The width will allow an RV to go around another RV parked at the office to check in. The driveway off Chicot Road should be constructed with a concrete apron starting 18 feet from the centerline of the street to the right-of-way line. Pavement should be provided on Chicot Road for widening to 18 feet per Master Street Plan and Public Works details. Indentions should be provided in the curb of the driveway for future access ramps. The driveway onto I-30 should be lengthened at least 5 feet to provide sufficient room for RV’s to stack waiting to enter the I-30 frontage road. The current design requires the nose of the RV to be closer than 5 feet from the through lanes of traffic on the I-30 frontage road. This lengthening will require adjustments in the street radiuses for WB-40 vehicles to maneuver. The driveway onto I-30 frontage road is indicated at 26 feet wide but without curb and gutter. Curb and gutter should be provided. Trees are shown to be placed in the pavement which reduces the available turning radius for a WB-40 vehicle. The parking stalls are proposed as gravel with a light colored chat with the exception of the designated landscape areas. Most of the lot will be gravel, to provide for easier maintenance operation and minimize storm water detention requirements. The zoning ordinance typically requires all wheeled area to be constructed of a hard surface material. Staff is not supportive of the request. The site plan as presented does not include adequate landscaping or areas for outdoor livability as typically required August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-3150-I 9 by the ordinances. Staff feels the site plan as proposed is maximizing the site for development and paying little attention to landscaping and livability. Staff feels if the site is developed for an RV park the developers should at least provide the meet or exceed the typical minimums requirements of the various ordinances. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were registered objectors present. Chairman Stebbins stated when fewer than nine Commissioners were present the Commission typically offer the applicant the option of deferral to a later hearing date. Chairman Stebbins stated for an item to be recommended for approval six affirmative votes were required. He stated presently there were seven Commissioners present. Mr. Bob Holloway requested on behalf of the applicant a deferral of the item to the next available public hearing. Staff stated the hearing date would be August 30, 2007. A motion was made to defer the item to the August 30, 2007, public hearing. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 1 no, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 5 FILE NO.: Z-5535-B NAME: St. Michael’s Episcopal Church Revised Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: Located at 12415 Cantrell Road OWNER: St. Michael’s Episcopal Church 12415 Cantrell Road Little Rock, AR 72223 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 PROPOSAL: A revision to the previously approved Conditional Use Permit site plan to reduced the approved site plan area. BACKGROUND: On January 14, 1992, the Little Rock Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for St. Michael’s Church allowing for the construction of a church on 4.3 acres of this site. No construction activity had taken place and on May 3, 2004, a revision to the Conditional Use Permit for St. Michael’s Episcopal Church was approved by the Little Rock Planning Commission. The revision was to allow the previously approved site area to expand by 2.2 acres. The applicant requested a revision to the previously approved Conditional Use Permit to include the additional 2.2 acre site and the two single-family homes located on it. The acquisition of the second parcel made possible a less dense site design. The parking lots and building footprints were “broken up” so as to make better use of the topography and to provide a better and more natural site development. The two houses were to remain single-family homes for the immediate future as a parsonage or caretaker’s house. Future plans included the conversion of the structures into classroom or office space as a part of the church program, a youth or retreat center or removed and replaced with a distant third or fourth phase of program development which would require return to the Commission. The church building and associated parking has been constructed. 1. SITE LOCATION: The site is located on the south side of Cantrell Road at 12415 Cantrell Road. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The church has existed at this site for many years. Surrounding properties are developed with multi-family residences to the east and office uses to the west. There is a lake located on the southern perimeter and across the lake are single-family residences located in the Piedmont Subdivision. Allowing the site August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-B 2 plan to be revised to remove the two residential structures from the approved site plan will not affect the church’s continued compatibility with the neighborhood. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The church’s sanctuary has a seating capacity of 175 persons with an average attendance of about 130. The attendance is 15 for the 8:00 am service, 35 for the 9:00 am service and 80 for the 11:00 am service. The site contains a total of 62 on-site parking spaces and eight (8) spaces along the common drive. Parking for the church is calculated on the seating capacity in the main worship area. The parking typically required for this size church would be 43 parking spaces. There is no change proposed to the sanctuary under this proposal; thus, no change is required in parking. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. All landscaping that is dead, diseased or missing will require replacement in conjunction with this request. 5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: 1. Cantrell Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial. Dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline will be required. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPARTMENT AND CATA COMMENTS: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easement for Lot 2. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. Additional fire hydrant(s) may be required. Contact the Fire Department having jurisdiction to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-B 3 CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Route #25 – the Highway 10 Express Route. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were few outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Staff stated the existing dumpster located on the site was not properly screened and requested the applicant provide proper screening. Staff requested the applicant provide the total seating capacity of the church and the average attendance of the membership. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. STAFF ANALYSIS: St. Michaels’ Episcopal Church is located on R-2 zoned property, with a Conditional Use Permit for the church, at 12415 Cantrell Road. The approved C.U.P. site plan includes the church building, parking and two single-family structures to be used for residential purposes or for church related activities. The request is a revision to the C.U.P. to remove the single-family structures from the approved site plan. As separate items on this agenda there are requests for the creation of a two lot plat (S-1580) and a rezoning to POD (Z-5535-C). Staff recommends the vehicle parking and striping in the driveway be removed since the driveway is only 25 feet wide. The parking spaces are located along the entrance drive. This would be the only modification proposed to the church site. With the removal of the parking spaces staff’s concerns related to sight distances when entering and exiting the proposed new drive to serve the office development will be minimized. Staff is supportive of the proposed C.U.P. The site is not located in an area covered by a bill of assurance. To staff’s knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested C.U.P. subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends the vehicle parking and striping in the driveway be removed since the driveway is only 25 feet wide. Staff recommends the existing dumpster be screen as required per Section 36-523(d). August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 5 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-B 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the requested C.U.P. subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the agenda staff report. Staff presented a recommendation the vehicle parking and striping in the driveway be removed since the driveway was only 25 feet wide. Staff also presented a recommendation the existing dumpster be screen as required per Section 36-523(d). There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 6 FILE NO.: Z-5535-C NAME: DAV Short-form POD LOCATION: Located at 12415 Cantrell Road DEVELOPER: DAV Properties, LLC 14109 Taylor Loop Road Little Rock, AR 72223 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 ARCHITECT: Terry Burruss, Architects 1202 South Main Street, Suite 230 Little Rock, AR 72202 AREA: 1.61 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-family with a CUP ALLOWED USES: Church and Single-family PROPOSED ZONING: POD PROPOSED USE: General and Professional Office uses VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: On January 14, 1992, the Little Rock Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for St. Michael’s Church allowing for the construction of a church on 4.3 acres of this site. No construction activity had taken place and on May 3, 2004, a revision to the Conditional Use Permit for St. Michael’s Episcopal Church was approved by the Little Rock Planning Commission. The revision was to allow the previously approved site August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-C 2 area to expand by 2.2 acres. The applicant requested a revision to the previously approved Conditional Use Permit to include the additional 2.2 acre site and the two single-family homes located on it. The acquisition of the second parcel made possible a less dense site design. The parking lots and building footprints were “broken up” so as to make better use of the topography and to provide a better and more natural site development. The two houses were to remain single-family homes for the immediate future and used as a parsonage or caretaker’s house. Future plans included the conversion of the structures into classroom or office space as a part of the church program, a youth or retreat center or removed and replaced with a distant third or fourth phase of program development which would require return to the Commission. The church building and associated parking have been constructed. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking as separate items on this agenda a request for the creation of a two lot plat (S-1580) and a revision to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit (Z-5535-B). The church (the revision to the C.U.P.) is proposed on a lot containing 4.97 acres and this rezoning request is a lot containing 1.61 acres. The applicant is seeking the rezoning of this 1.61 acres from R-2, Single-family to POD to allow the existing single-family structures to be converted to an office use. The development is proposed with a shared drive extending from the existing St. Michael’s driveway into the site from the west. The new drive is proposed with parking located along the drive and adjacent to the existing structures. The structures contain a total of 3,960 square feet of gross floor area and each has a carport area which has been proposed for enclosure for additional office area. The site plan includes the placement of 22 on-site parking spaces. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains two vacant single-family homes. There is a church located to the southwest which the office development proposes to share a driveway with. There is a significant grade difference between the church and the homes with the homes sitting on top a ridge. Access to the homes is presently from Cantrell Road through a shared driveway. The church has a separate drive extending from Cantrell Road. Other uses in the area included multi-family, commercial and office uses. There is a large tract of undeveloped property to the northeast previously approved as a PRD for condominium housing. To the northwest are office uses and a recently approved health studio and spa. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All owners of property located within 200-feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified, located within 300-feet of the site along with the Pankey Community Improvement District, the Piedmont Property Owners Association, the Pleasant August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-C 3 Forest Property Owners Association and the Walton Height-Candlewood Property Owners Associations were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Cantrell Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial. Dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline will be required. 2. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with Section 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. 3. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 4. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 5. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. 6. Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Sections 30-43 and 31-210. The lots must share a single driveway access. The width of driveway must not exceed 36 feet. The eastern driveway must be removed. 7. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 8. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineer 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 9. Erosion controls must be installed to reduce discharge of polluted storm water. 10. Due to width of western driveway and sight distance, parking must be removed from the driveway or future access easement. 11. The turning radius for the new driveway into Lot 2 should have a minimum radius for SU-30 vehicles. The new driveway should meet the existing driveway (access easement) at a 90 degree angle. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-C 4 E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easement for Lot 2. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. Additional fire hydrant(s) may be required. Contact the Fire Department having jurisdiction to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). Fire Department: Place and install fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Route #25 – the Pinnacle Mountain Express Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Office Development to allow for an office use within the existing structures. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians since this is a Principal Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of the development. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-C 5 City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan. The Residential goal states: “Enforce the construction of sidewalks with all types of development.” The Sustainable Natural Environment goal states: “Preserve the Highway 10 Design Overlay District.” Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. The Highway 10 Design Overlay District typically requires the placement of a 25-foot average landscape strip along the side and rear perimeters of the site. As proposed the site plan indicates the placement of a drive within this landscape buffer strip along the eastern perimeter. 3. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. 4. Berming is encouraged on this site to help screen the proposed parking areas. 5. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Staff stated the proposed drive was located within the typically required 25-foot landscape strip per the Highway 10 Design Overlay District along the eastern edge of the property. Staff questioned the proposed use of the property, if the existing carport structures would be enclosed for additional square footage and if the site would contain a dumpster facility. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the development would be required to remove the drive extending to the site from Cantrell Road. Staff also stated a grading permit would be required prior to any clearing on the site. Staff stated the turning radius for the new driveway into Lot 2 should have a minimum radius for a SU-30 vehicle. Staff stated the new drive should meet the existing drive at a 90 degree angle. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated an automatic irrigation system would be required to water landscaped areas. Staff stated the City Beautiful Commission recommended preserving as many trees as feasible on the August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-C 6 site and credit toward fulfilling typical landscape ordinance requirements could be given when preserving trees of six inch caliper or larger. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated one user will occupy both structures, revised the plan to eliminate the encroachment into the eastern landscape strip and indicated the existing drive from Cantrell Road will be removed. A dumpster is not proposed for the site and the carport structures will be enclosed for additional square footage. The drive has also been revised to meet the existing drive at a 90 degree angle. The turning radius for the new driveway into Lot 2 is not sufficient for an SU-30 vehicle to turn into and out of Lot 2 into the access easement. Staff recommends the turning radius be increased to allow for vehicles to maneuver the site. The applicant is seeking a deferral of the required sidewalk placement along Cantrell Road. Staff is supportive of the deferral request for the sidewalk placement since sidewalks are not located on adjacent properties. The request is to rezone the property from R-2, Single-family to POD to allow an office user to occupy these two existing structures. The structures contain a total of 3,960 square feet of gross floor area and each of the structures has a carport which is proposed for enclosure for additional office area. This area has been included in the total square footage of gross floor area on the site. The site plan indicates the placement of 22 on site parking spaces. Based on parking typically required for an office development 9 parking spaces would typically be required. The parking as indicated is more than adequate to meet the typical minimum ordinance requirements. The site plan indicates the placement of a single sign located near the drive entrance to the development. The sign is proposed with a maximum height of six feet and a maximum sign area of 72 square feet. The signage proposed is consistent with signage allowed per the Highway 10 Design Overlay District. The structures are existing on the site. The eastern most structure is located within the 100-foot building setback as typically required by the Highway 10 Design Overlay District. Presently the structure is located outside this typical setback but with the right of way dedication per the Master Street Plan the structure will fall within the setback. The Highway 10 Design Overlay District typically requires a landscape strip of 25-feet around the perimeters of the site with the exception of the street buffer which is required at 40-feet. The existing street buffer is more than adequate to August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5535-C 7 meet the typical minimum ordinance requirements. The eastern buffer appears to be less than the 25-foot minimum at the northern edge of the structure by a few feet. The days and hours of operation are proposed as typical office hours or from 8 am to 6 pm Monday through Friday. The company provides design layout for various publications. The actual printing takes place off site. Staff is supportive of the request. Although the existing structures do not fully comply with the typical standards of the Highway 10 Design Overlay District the structures are existing and no building modifications are proposed. Staff does not feel the rezoning of the site from R-2, Single-family to POD to allow the existing structures to be used as office uses will significantly impact the area. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the agenda staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the agenda staff report. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 7 FILE NO.: Z-6915-C NAME: Gamble Road Short-form PCD and Land Alteration Variance Request LOCATION: Located on the Northwest corner of Chenal Parkway and Gamble Road DEVELOPER: Davis Properties P.O. Box 241025 Little Rock, AR 72223 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 ARCHITECT: Terry Burruss, Architects 1202 South Main Street, Suite 230 Little Rock, AR 72202 AREA: 3.22 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0 CURRENT ZONING: PCD ALLOWED USES: O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District uses PROPOSED ZONING: Revised PCD PROPOSED USE: O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District uses VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: A request to rezone the site from O-3, General Office District to PCD was reviewed and approved by the Little Rock Planning Commission at their March 8, 2001, Public August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 2 Hearing. This applicant requested staff not forward the item to the Board of Directors for final action therefore the property remained zoned O-3. The applicant proposed a three-lot plat to consist of O-3, General Office District permitted uses and a furniture store. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved a request for a preliminary plat of this site at their May 26, 2005, Public Hearing. The applicant requested the subdivision of 3.22 acres of O-3, General Office District zoned property into two lots. The average lot size proposed was 1.79 acre with Lot 1 being 1.23 acres and Lot 2 being 2.34 acres. Proposed Lot 1 had street frontage to Chenal Parkway but was not allowed a driveway access. A cross access and utility easement was approved to serve Lot 1. Ordinance No. 19,455 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on December 5, 2005, rezoned the site from O-3, General Office District to PCD and established Gamble Road Short-form PCD. The rezoning for Lot 2 to PCD allowed the development of Gamble Road Plaza Center a three-story building with a lower level, a main level and an upper level. The lower level would be used for office space and some storage space. The main level was proposed for retail space and the upper level containing office space. The site was to be developed with approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space and 19,630 square feet of office space. The development was proposed as 62 percent office utilizing O-3, General Office District uses and 38 percent commercial utilizing C-3, General Commercial District uses. The applicant indicated a furniture store was proposed to locate on the site along with several office users. The furniture store would have an area of showroom and display along with an area of warehousing. The applicant proposed the right of way for Gamble Road be abandoned and access to Rock Creek Park to the north preserved via an access and utility easement located within the east 20-feet of the existing right of way. Access to Lot 1 would be maintained with an access easement for use of the existing driveway along the east side of Lot 1. Ordinance No. 19,454 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on December 5, 2005, abandoned the right of way for Gamble Road. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is now seeking a rezoning of the site to allow the development of the site in two phases with a single building constructed in each phase. The first phase is proposed with the construction of a 6,000 square foot two story building constructed for an office user. The second building is also proposed as a two-story building with 20,300 square feet utilizing the ground level as retail and the upper level as office spaces. The site plan includes 76 on-site parking spaces to serve the development. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 3 The applicant is also seeking a variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow advanced grading of the site. The applicant is seeking to grade the entire site with the construction of the sites first building. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains an existing medical office building taking access from Gamble Road (previously abandoned). There is an apartment complex located to the west of the site. To the north of the site is the Rock Creek Floodway; an area identified on the Parks Master Plan as recreational open space. The area to the east of the site is zoned PCD and is a strip retail center. South of the site are commercial uses located on C-3, General Commercial District zoned property. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: The Parkway Place Neighborhood Association, the Gibralter Heights Neighborhood Association along with all property owners located within 200-feet of the site and all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site were notified of the public hearing. As of this writing staff has received one informational phone call from an area resident. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. If the applicant plans to clear Phase 2 with construction of Phase 1, a variance from the Land Alteration Regulations must be requested. 2. A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan will be required per Section 29-186 (e). 3. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. 4. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 5. A special Grading Permit for Flood Hazard Areas will be required per Section 8-283 prior to construction. 6. Provide existing topographic information at maximum five-foot contour interval. Show the limits of the 100-year floodway and floodplain. 7. The minimum Finish Floor elevation is required to be shown on plat and grading plans. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 4 8. The median shown in the site plan is not drawn correctly. The intersection has 2 thru lanes and a right turn lane. 9. In accordance with Section 31-176, floodway areas must be shown as floodway easements or be dedicated to the public. In addition, a 25 foot wide access easement is required adjacent to the floodway boundary. 10. The abandoned right of way must be platted with a 20 foot access easement to allow access to City owned property for maintenance. The previous application showed the easement on the eastern side of the abandoned right of way. 11. The proposed driveway into and out of proposed development must be redesigned for a straight vehicular movement into and out of the development and not require vehicles to jog left or right. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available to the site. Sewer service for 13100 Chenal Parkway may cross property involved in development. If so sewer main will be required with easement to serve the existing building. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding the size and location of the water meter. Additional fire hydrant(s) will be required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). No signs, light poles, flag poles or other objects with foundations will be allowed within the waterline easement crossing this property. Extra care must be taken to protect the water main within this easement. Fire Department: Place and install fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 5 F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Multi Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a revised Planned Commercial Development to allow construction of two buildings on the site. A Land Use Plan Amendment (LU01-19-01) to change this area to Mixed Use was approved by the Planning Commission for this site on March 8, 2001, but this amendment was never acted on by the Board of Directors. If the current zoning item Z-6915-C is approved by the Planning Commission, this Land Use Plan amendment will go to the Board of Directors along with the zoning item. Master Street Plan: Chenal Parkway is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians since this is a Principal Arterial. Bicycle Plan: A Class I bike route is shown north of this site according to the Master Street Plan bicycle section. A Class I bikeway is built separate from or alongside a road. Additional paving and right of way may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the Rock Creek Neighborhood Action Plan. The Park and Recreation goal states: “Work with Parks and Recreation to develop open space behind Target into a passive park system with access from Chenal Parkway (via Gamble Road) and Markham Street.” The Office and Commercial Development goal states: “Aggressively use Planned Zoning Districts (PZDs) to influence more neighborhood-friendly and better quality developments.” Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a twenty-three foot (23’) wide land use buffer along the northern perimeter of the property. Seventy percent of this area is to remain undisturbed. 3. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a twenty foot wide (20’) land use buffer along the western most portion of the property, next to the residentially zoned areas. Seventy percent of this area is to remain undisturbed. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 6 4. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a nine foot wide (9’) land use buffer along the western/southern portion of the site, next to the office zoned property. Seventy percent of this area is to remain undisturbed. 5. The zoning street buffer requires an average twenty-three foot (23’) wide street buffer and in no point be less than half along Chenal Parkway. 6. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern, western, and southern perimeters of the site, where located to areas that are deemed less intensity uses by the City of Little Rock code. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year-around requirement. 7. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to provide an approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. 9. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of technical issues associated with the request remaining outstanding. Staff requested the applicant include a cross access easement on the site plan to serve Lot 1. Staff also questioned the total office and total commercial spaces proposed for the site. Staff questioned if the developers were willing to limit the available square footage for restaurant use. Staff stated the site was located within the Chenal Design Overlay District which regulated signage and overhead utilities. Staff questioned the location for the proposed signage including the total height and area and the total area for the proposed building signage. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the driveway into the proposed development must be realigned to provide straight vehicular movement into and out of the development. Staff stated the abandoned right of way must be platted as a 20 foot access easement to access City owned property for maintenance. Staff questioned if the entire site would be cleared with the development of Phase I. Staff stated if this was the case a variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance would be required. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated a minimum street buffer of 23-feet would be required along Chenal Parkway. Staff also stated a 20-foot August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 7 land use buffer would be required along the western perimeter and 9-foot along the eastern perimeter. Staff stated an automatic irrigation system would be required to water landscaped areas. Staff stated a landscape plan would be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The revised plan has not addressed staff’s concerns related to vehicular access. Vehicles must still jog left or right to enter or exit the development creating a traffic hazard. Staff feels only a minor modification is necessary to remedy this situation and recommends the entrance be redesigned with the assistance of the City Traffic Engineer. The site is proposed for development in two phases with a single building constructed in each phase. The first phase is proposed with the construction of a building footprint with 3,000 square feet and the structure being a two story office building. The second building is proposed as a two story building with a 10,150 square foot building footprint utilizing the ground level as retail and the upper level as office spaces. The maximum building height proposed is 30-feet. The request includes a limit of 20 percent of the gross floor area for a restaurant user or 2,030 square feet. The total building square footage proposed for the site is 26,300 square feet with 16,150 square feet designated for office space and 10,150 square feet for commercial space. The site plan includes 76 on-site parking spaces to serve the development. Based on typical minimum parking requirements a total of 40 parking spaces would be required to serve the proposed office use and 33 to serve the commercial space. Based on a portion of the site being used for a restaurant use 47 parking spaces would be required to serve the commercial portion of the development or 20 spaces for the restaurant and the remainder to serve potential commercial users. Based on the maximum intensity of uses a total of 80 parking spaces would typically be required for the office and commercial uses. Although the indicated parking is four spaces less than the typical minimum ordinance requirement staff is supportive of the parking as proposed. The street buffer has been indicated at 11-feet 9-inches narrowing to 9-feet. The ordinance typically requires the placement of a 23-foot street buffer and in no case less than one-half or 11-feet 5-inches. The width of the drive aisle August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 8 accessing the western property exceeds the typical design standard and could be reduced to allow for the typical minimum width of the street buffer. Staff recommends the drive be reduced to allow the entirety of the street buffer to be not less than 11-feet 5-inches. In addition, staff recommends the applicant provide a berm and additional plantings at one and one-half times the typical planting requirement in this area to enhance the landscaped area and minimize any potential impact of the reduced buffering. A single ground mounted sign has been indicated on the site plan at the driveway entrance. The sign is proposed consistent with signage allowed per the Chenal Design Overlay District or a maximum of eight feet in height and 100 square feet in area. Building signage is proposed as typically allowed per the zoning ordinance for commercial building signage or a maximum of ten percent of the façade area. The applicant is seeking to place the signage on the fronts of the building as allowed in Section 36-557. According to this section all on-premise wall signage must face required street frontage except in complexes where a sign without street frontage would be the only means of identification for a tenant. The applicant is also seeking a variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow advanced grading of the site. The applicant is seeking to grade the entire site with the construction of the sites first building. Staff is supportive of the request but requests the applicant provide sketch grading and drainage plan showing areas proposed to be graded and areas not disturbed prior to the issuance of a building permit. The site plan includes the placement of a dumpster pad containing two dumpster receptacles. The hours of service are indicated after 6:00 am. The site is located adjacent to Rock Creek with the St. Charles Neighborhood to the north and an apartment development located to the west. To limit the potential adverse impacts to the adjoining residential uses, staff recommends the dumpster service hours be limited to daylight hours. Staff is supportive of the applicant’s request. The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site to allow the site to develop with a mixed use development utilizing 61 percent of the site as office uses. Although the site does not fully comply with the typical minimum standards for parking and street buffering staff does not feel the development as proposed will significantly impact the development or the adjoining properties. To staff’s knowledge there are no remaining outstanding technical issues associated with the request. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the agenda staff report. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6915-C 9 Staff recommends the applicant increase the street buffer along Chenal Parkway to a minimum of 11-feet 5-inches and include a berm and additional plantings at one and one half times the typical minimum ordinance requirement. Staff recommends approval of the variance request from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow grading of the area proposed for Phase II with the development of Phase I. Staff recommends the dumpster service hours be limited to daylight hours. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the agenda staff report. Staff presented a recommendation the street buffer along Chenal Parkway be increased to a minimum of 11-feet 5-inches and include a berm and additional plantings at one and one half times the typical minimum ordinance requirement. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the variance request from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow grading of the area proposed for Phase II with the development of Phase I. Staff also presented a recommendation the dumpster service hours be limited to daylight hours. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 8 FILE NO.: Z-6245-B NAME: Kanis/Kirby Rezoning from R-2 to C-3 and O-3 LOCATION: Located on the Northwest corner of Kanis and Kirby Roads DEVELOPER: LGR Investment, LLC 404 E. Kiehl Avenue North Little Rock, AR 72020 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 5.6 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and R-2, Single-family PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 – Ellis Mountain CENSUS TRACT: 42.10 VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North – R-2, Single-family District – Single-family Residences and PD-O for an office use South – Vacant - Conceptual PCD presently at the Board of Directors for approval to establish uses and create lots (August 6, 2007) East – R-2, Single-family District – Single-family Residences West – C-1, Neighborhood Commercial - Vacant - PCD zoning for a convenience store with gas pumps at the Board of Directors on appeal of the Planning Commission’s recommendation of denial (August 6, 2007) August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 8 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6245-B 2 A. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: 1. Kanis Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. Per the Master Street Plan an additional 10 feet of right-of-way is required to be dedicated for the right turn lane onto Kirby Road. 2. Asbury Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 3. Kirby Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 4. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Kanis Road and Kirby Road. 5. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Kanis Road and Asbury Road. 6. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Kanis Road including 5- foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 33 feet from centerline. A right turn lane should be installed at the Kanis Road-Kirby Road intersection. The right turn lane should be provided with 150 feet of stacking distance and 100 foot taper. 7. With site development, provide the design of the street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvements to Kirby Road including 5- foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 18 feet from the centerline. 8. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Asbury Road including 5- foot sidewalk with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 18 feet from centerline. 9. The future driveway on Kanis Road must align with Woodlands Edge Trail. If future driveways are proposed on Kanis Road they must be right in/right out only and meet the City driveway spacing criteria. 10. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 11. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 8 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6245-B 3 12. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 13. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineering 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 14. Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering must approve completed plans prior to construction. 15. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. B. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. The Parkway Place Property Owners Association, the Gibralter Heights/Point West/Timber Ridge Neighborhood Association, all owners of property located within 200 feet of the site and all residents, who could be identified, located within 300 feet of the proposed development were notified of the public hearing. E. LAND USE ELEMENT: Planning Division: This request is located in the Ellis Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Mixed Office Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2, Single-family to C-3, General Commercial District and O-3, General Office District. A land use plan amendment for a change to Commercial and Office is a separate item on this agenda (LU07-18-01). Master Street Plan: Kanis Road is shown as a Minor Arterial on the plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Kirby Road is shown as a Collector. The primary function of a Collector is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Kanis Road since it is a Minor Arterial. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 8 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6245-B 4 Bicycle Plan: A Class III bike route is planned along Kirby Road and south across Kanis Road. A Class III bikeway is a signed route on a street shared with traffic. No additional paving or right-of-way is required. Class III bicycle route signage may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is covered under the Rock Creek Neighborhood Action Plan. The Plan’s Office and Commercial goal states: “Aggressively use Planned Zoning Districts (PZDs) to influence more neighborhood-friendly and better quality developments.” F. STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant owns approximately 10 acres located north of Kanis Road at the intersections of Kirby and Asbury Roads. The property is currently zoned R-2, Single- family and C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and the applicant is requesting to rezone the property to O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District excluding Convenience food store with gas pumps, Beverage shop and Bar, lounge or tavern as allowable uses for the property with Planning Commission site plan review and approval prior to development. As separate items on this agenda the applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval (S-1582) to allow the creation of two lots with 3.49 acres proposed for C-3 zoning and .97 acres proposed for office zoning and an amendment to the City’s Future Land Use Plan (LU07-18-01) to change the Plan from Mixed Office Commercial to Commercial. This rezoning request is proposed to allow future development of the property. Ordinance No. 17,442 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on April 1, 1997, rezoned a portion of this site (0.34 acres) from R-2, Single-family to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. The site contains a number of residences both site built and manufactured homes and a building constructed for a commercial use a number of years ago now being used as a residence. There is a property to the north on Asbury Road zoned PD-O currently being used as an office for Davis Forestry. To the north on Kirby Road the property is zoned R-2 with a CUP which was approved to allow a manufactured home on the property. To the southeast is a newly developing single-family subdivision with attached and detached residential structures. South of the site is property presently zoned O-3, General Office District and C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District being considered for rezoning by the Board of Directors on August 6, 2007, to PCD to create lots and establish uses for the Woodlands Edge overall Master Plan. To the west of the site is a vacant property currently zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District. The property is to be considered by the Board of Directors on August 6, 2007, for a rezoning to PCD to allow a convenience store with gas pumps and a carwash. Northwest of the site is a property zoned PD-R which was approved to allow the construction of attached single-family homes. The City’s Future Land Use Plan designates this property as “Mixed Office Commercial”. A land use plan amendment for a change to a portion of this site to Commercial is a separate item on this agenda (LU07-18-01). August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 8 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6245-B 5 Staff is not supportive of the C-3, General Commercial District portion of the rezoning request. The entirety of the property is identified on the City’s Future Land Use Plan as Mixed Office Commercial, which provides for a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur. Acceptable uses include office or mixed office and commercial uses. A planned zoning district is required if the use is mixed office and commercial. As previously stated the applicant is seeking a change to the City’s Future Land Use Plan as a separate item on this agenda for the commercial portion of the rezoning application. Staff is not in support of the change to the City’s Future Land Use Plan allowing this area to become designated as Commercial. The Kanis Road corridor has been reviewed a number of times in the recent past and it has generally been determined the current land use designations are acceptable to allow for the future growth and development of the area. An established single-family neighborhood is located immediately north of the site, which in staff’s opinion, should be coddled to limit the potential impacts of intense commercial activities in their back yard. South and southwest of the site is property currently being considered by the Board of Directors for rezoning to a Planned Commercial Development to establish uses and create lot layouts for future development. This area is being developed as a part of the overall Master Plan for the Woodlands Edge Subdivision. This item is scheduled to be heard by the Little Rock Board of Directors on August 6, 2007. Staff feels the zoning of the property should not be approved and the future development be in-line with the City’s Future Land Use Plan designation of Mixed Office Commercial. The present designation would allow for office development on the property. Staff would support a rezoning to O-3, General Office District for the entirety of the property or development in some manner as a Planned Zoning District as required by present Future Land Use designation. Staff feels that C-3, General Commercial District zoning at this location could have an adverse impact on the surrounding residential uses. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated August 10, 2007, requesting a deferral of this item to the September 27, 2007, public hearing. Staff stated they were supportive of the deferral request. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for deferral. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 9 FILE NO.: LU07-12-01 Name: Land Use Plan Amendment - 65th Street West Planning District Location: The southwest corner of Colonel Glenn and David O. Dodd bounded by Lawson Road Request: Community Shopping and Office to Commercial and Mixed Office Commercial Source: Joe White, White Daters and Associates PROPOSAL / REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the 65th Street West Planning District from Community Shopping and Office to Commercial and Mixed Office Commercial. Commercial includes a broad range of retail and wholesale of products, services, and business activities. Mixed Office Commercial allows a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The amendment area is currently zoned C-3 General Commercial, O-3 General Office and R-2 Single Family. The property has a grocery store/convenience store on the northwest corner and a large gas station on the northeast corner. There are six single-family homes currently on this property and a small cemetery. The remainder of the amendment area is undeveloped. To the north of this amendment area is zoned Planned Office Development for Bowman Plaza I offices. To the west of the amendment area is zoned Planned Development Commercial for Kinco Constructors. To the east of the amendment area is zoned C-3 General Commercial for a bank, the Rave movie theater, several auto dealerships, and future developments. To the south and southwest of the area is mostly zoned R-2 Single Family for single-family residences and JA Fair School. There is a small amount of O-2 Office zoning at the corner of Lawson and Lawson Cutoff, which is still undeveloped. There is also a small parcel to the west of the amendment area that is zoned C-3 General Commercial but which remains undeveloped and for sale. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: The amendment area is currently shown as Community Shopping and Office on the Future Land Use Plan. To the west is shown as Commercial and Office. North of this site is shown as Mixed Office Commercial. To the northeast is shown as Public Institutional. East is all shown as Commercial. South is shown as Public Institutional for the school, and southwest is shown as Office and Single Family. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9 (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-12-01 2 Ordinance 19,308 was approved on April 19, 2005 to amend the southeast corner of David O. Dodd Road and Bowman Plaza Drive from Office to Commercial with a Park/Open Space buffer for future commercial development and buffering. Ordinance 18,964 was approved on October 21, 2003 to amend the area west of Interstate 430 and southeast of David O. Dodd road from Office to Commercial and Park/Open Space for future commercial development and buffering. Ordinance 18,799 was approved on January 7, 2003 to amend the Office west of the intersection of Colonel Glenn and Lawson Roads to Commercial for a construction company office development. MASTER STREET PLAN: Colonel Glenn Road is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and David O. Dodd Road is shown as a Minor Arterial. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians. BICYCLE PLAN: A Class I bike route is shown on the Master Street Plan bicycle section on this application site. A Class I bikeway is built separate from or alongside a road. Additional paving and right of way may be required. PARKS: According to the Master Parks Plan, this area is within eight blocks of a park or open space. Just south of this amendment area is JA Fair Junior High School, which offers some recreational opportunities. HISTORIC DISTRICTS: There are no city recognized historic districts that would be affected by this amendment. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9 (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-12-01 3 CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The property under review is not located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan. ANALYSIS: The amendment area is currently shown as Community Shopping and Office on the Future Land Use Plan. The applicant has requested a change from Community Shopping to Commercial along Colonel Glenn Road. The remaining Community Shopping and Office would be changed to Mixed Office Commercial as part of a large Planned Commercial Development. This PCD would help control the types of uses allowable in the Mixed Office Development. The vicinity has been developing rapidly in the past twenty years. There is a growing demand for more commercial land in this area as it is all quickly being developed. In 1997, the Future Land Use Plan was amended at the corner of Colonel Glenn Road and I-430 from Community Shopping, Suburban Office and Office to Commercial for the development of the Rave movie theater and a car dealership. That amendment provided nearly 66 acres of Commercial land in the area. Much of this area is currently developed. In 2003, 50 more acres of Office were amended to Commercial with Ordinance 18964. A portion of this land has since been developed into a luxury car dealership. The northern half of the amendment area is currently shown as Community Shopping. Community Shopping is usually reserved for large shopping centers with one or more general merchandise stores. Most of the amendment site is undeveloped. There are currently two gas stations on the Colonel Glenn portion of the amendment. They are shown as Community Shopping on the Plan, and this amendment would change them to Commercial. The amendment would also affect all of the land between these two gas stations. A change to Commercial for this site would be more appropriate since it fits the types of Commercial developing and likely to develop in this area The rest of the amendment area is currently shown as Community Shopping and Office. The proposed change would result in a large area of Mixed Office Commercial. This Mixed Office Commercial would be a step down in intensity from the Commercial along Colonel Glenn. The change continues the office and commercial use pattern on the Plan. The requirement of a Planned Zoning district will provide the City some additional protections with future development of the area. The amendment area is surrounded by Office to the west, south and southeast. This existing Office shown will be another step down in intensity from August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9 (Cont.) FILE NO.: LU07-12-01 4 the Mixed Office Commercial and will serve as a buffer to protect the existing Single Family and the Public Institutional shown for JA Fair School. The Planned Commercial Development should be used to ensure only Office uses are allowed in the Mixed Office Commercial area except for the main mixed-use building that is currently being considered. The southern portion of this Mixed Office Commercial should have mostly Office uses since it is located so close to a school. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations: John Barrow and Stagecoach/Dodd. Staff has received no comments from area residents. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes the change is appropriate since the Commercial better represents the Commercial developing in that area and Mixed Office Commercial continues both uses shown on the Plan with the requirement of a Planned Zoning District (subject to any single uses in the southern section of the area being office). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The item was placed on consent agenda for approval. By a vote of 7 for, 0 against the consent agenda was approved. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 9.1 FILE NO.: Z-6973-D NAME: The Village at Colonel Glenn Revised Preliminary Plat, The Village at Colonel Glenn Short-form PCD for Lot 8 and Land Alteration Variance Request LOCATION: Located on the Southwest corner of Colonel Glenn and David O Dodd Roads DEVELOPER: Colonel Glenn, Sextet, LLC P.O. Box 13267 Maumelle, AR 72113 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 18.2 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 12 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District ALLOWED USES: General Office and Commercial PROPOSED ZONING: PCD, O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District PROPOSED USE: O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: A variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance to allow advanced grading. BACKGROUND: Various zoning actions rezoned this property from R-2, Single-family to C-3, General Commercial District and O-3, General Office District. Ordinance No. 18,446 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on March 20, 2001, rezoned a 7.7 acre tract to C-3, General Commercial District (2.96 acres) and O-3, General Office District (4.87 acres). Ordinance No. 19,046 adopted January 20, 2004, rezoned one (1) acre from R-2, August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 2 Single-family to C-3, General Commercial District and 1.74 acres to O-3, General Office District. Ordinance No. 19,253 adopted December 21, 2004, rezoned 1.087 acres from R-2, Single-family to C-3, General Commercial District. On January 20, 2005, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for convenience store with carwash on the corner of David O Dodd and Colonel Glenn Roads. The Little Rock Planning Commission approved a preliminary plat for a large portion of this site on April 22, 2004. The applicant requested a preliminary plat to subdivide 12.8 acres into 12 non-residential lots zoned O-3, General Office District and C-3, General Commercial District. The applicant indicated driveways would be shared for the majority of the lots. Common access drives were to provide circulation between the various lots and the public streets. The applicant indicated street improvements would be constructed per the Master Street Plan and the lots would be final platted individually as the market demanded. The applicant indicated street construction would be placed on the entirety of the street when any lot abutting the street was final platted. On January 20, 2005, the applicant proposed to revise the previously approved preliminary plat by changing the name of the proposed subdivision and adding a small sliver of property located adjacent to Colonel Glenn Road. The preliminary plat was originally filed as Colonel Glenn Center and the applicant wishes to name the proposed subdivision the Village at Colonel Glenn. The applicant indicated additional property located in the northeast corner of the proposed addition at the intersection of Colonel Glenn and David O Dodd Road. The proposed subdivision contained 13.9 acres of commercially and office zoned properties. The average lot size proposed was 150-feet by 300-feet or 1.03 acres. The minimum lot size proposed was 0.73 acres. Shared driveways and common private drives provided interior access to all the proposed lots. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The project contains 13.61 acres located at the southwest corner of Colonel Glenn Road and David O Dodd Road. The developer is proposing a revision to a previously approved preliminary plat and the construction of a mixed use development on one of the proposed lots within the plat area. The development is proposed as a two story building on Lot 8 with retail uses on the ground floor and office uses on the upper floor. Employee parking will be provided in the rear of the building with ample customer parking in the front. The developer will construct the street improvements as required by the Master Street Plan and along the Colonel Glenn Road frontage adjacent to proposed Lots 1 – 4 and the David O Dodd frontage adjacent to Lots 6 and 7 with the development of Lot 8. The applicant is seeking approval of a variance request from the Land Alteration Ordinance. A site located on the south side of David O Dodd Road is proposed August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 3 to provide the dirt needed for the fill of the northern lots. Buffers will be provided along the abutting property lines and the street frontage. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Portions of the site are vacant and portions contain single-family homes scattered along Lawson Road. There is an existing grocery store located on the southeast corner of Colonel Glenn Road and Lawson Road, which is not a part of the proposed request. A new convenience store has been constructed on the southwest corner of Colonel Glenn Road and David O Dodd. This area is not included in the proposed request either. Areas along David O Dodd Road are primarily vacant and tree covered. The roads are unimproved roadways with open ditches for drainage and no curb, gutter or sidewalk in place. Other uses in the area include the Rave Theater and vacant C-3, General Commercial District zoned property located immediately to the east. There are other developed and vacant properties located further to the east, south of Colonel Glenn Road and west of I-430. To the north of the site is a site zoned POD which has developed as an office/warehouse development. West of the site is a PDC for Kinco Construction Company and also single-family homes located on tracts. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All owners of property located within 200-feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified, located within 300-feet, the John Barrow and the Stagecoach Dodd Neighborhood Associations were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. David O. Dodd Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2. Church Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 3. Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plans specifies that Lawson Road for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. 4. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to David O. Dodd and Church Road including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 29.5 feet from the August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 4 centerline. A right turn lane should be provided on David O. Dodd onto Lawson Cutoff to provide 250 feet of stacking distance and 150 foot taper. 5. With site development, provide the design of the street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Lawson Road including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be placed 18 feet from centerline. 6. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. If the applicant plans to clear additional lots besides Lot 8 on north side of David O. Dodd a variance must requested from the Land Alteration Regulations. 7. With site development, provide the design of the street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Colonel Glenn Road including 5-foot sidewalks with the planned development. The back of curb should be located 29.5 feet from the centerline of the street. 8. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 9. Provide a letter prepared by a registered engineer certifying the sight distance at the intersections comply with 2004 AASHTO Green Book standards. 10. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. 11. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner). 12. Street improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering must approve completed plans prior to construction. 13. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineering 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 14. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. 15. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 16. Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Sections 30-43 and 31-210. The width of driveway must August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 5 not exceed 36 feet. Per code, a driveway can be located a minimum of 300 feet from an intersection and the minimum driveway spacing on minor arterial streets is 300 feet. The driveway locations though were previously approved on the preliminary plat. 17. Due to the size of this development and its use, study vehicle trip generation and trip distribution for the development and also take into account existing and projected traffic growth and consider access to and from I-430. Provide an estimate of the amount of traffic increase from the proposed 12-acre subdivision on future traffic estimates. 18. The Church Road is officially named Lawson Cutoff and should be changed on plat. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Water main extensions, on-site fire line(s) and additional fire hydrant(s) will be required in order to provide service to this property. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place and install fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the 65th Street West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Community Shopping and Office for this August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 6 property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Commercial Development to allow a revision to a previously approved preliminary plat and to allow the development of one of the lots with a mixed use development. A land use plan amendment for a change to Mixed Office Commercial is a separate item on this agenda (LU07-12-01). Master Street Plan: Colonel Glenn is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and David O. Dodd is shown as a Minor Arterial. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians. Bicycle Plan: A Class I bike route is shown on the Master Street Plan bicycle section on this application site. A Class I bikeway is built separate from or alongside a road. Additional paving and right of way may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan. Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. 3. The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8 % of the paved areas be landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 ½ feet in width and 150 square feet in area. 4. A land use buffer will be required next to any residentially zoned abutting properties. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a land use buffer calculated at six (6%) percent of the average depth of the property with a nine foot minimum land use buffer next to residentially zoned property. Seventy percent (70 %) of this area to remain undisturbed. Both the grading plan and the landscaping plan will require this area be delineated as “area to remain undisturbed”. 5. The zoning buffer ordinance requires the following three (3) street buffer distances: a. David O’ Dodd, thirty-two foot average (32’), in no case less than half. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 7 b. Lawson Road, twenty four foot average (24’), in no case less than half. c. Colonel Glenn Road, forty foot average (40’), in no case less than half. 6. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on tree covered sites. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 7. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required between this property and the residentially zoned or used properties abutting the site. 8. A small amount of building landscaping is required. 9. The development is being reviewed as a single development rather than considering each individual platted lot. Based on this review regardless of the lot size at the time of building permit a landscape plan will be required as a part of the overall development plan. The landscape plan must be stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of issues associated with the request remaining outstanding. Staff stated the site plan did not provide for pedestrian connectivity throughout the site. Staff stated the site plan as indicated allowed a straight thru connection between David O Dodd Road and Colonel Glenn Road. Staff stated the plan should be revised to eliminate this connection. Staff questioned the building design and requested proposed construction materials. Staff also requested additional information concerning the signage plan. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the site plan indicated a variance to allow advanced grading including an area to the south of the site. Staff also stated the abutting streets would require dedication and construction to Master Street Plan standards. Staff requested the applicant provide a letter verifying sight distance at the intersections. Staff also requested the applicant study the trip generation and trip distribution for the development taking into account existing and project traffic growth and consideration for access to and from I-430. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated the indicated street buffers did not appear to comply with the typical minimum ordinance requirements. Staff stated a small amount of building landscaping would be required at the time of development. Staff stated the buffers and screening along the western perimeter August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 8 did not comply with typical minimum ordinance standards where the site abutted single-family zoned or used property. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated the proposed signage plan, eliminated the straight through connection from David O Dodd Road and Colonel Glenn Road and provided details of the proposed building construction. The applicant has indicated screening and buffering will comply with minimum ordinance standards per the landscaping and zoning ordinances with the exception of the area adjacent to the cemetery. The site plan indicates a minimum landscape strip of nine feet adjacent to the parking areas located on the northern and southern perimeters of the cemetery. The site plan is not meeting the average requirement of six percent of the average depth of the lot or approximately 24-feet. A variance is being requested to grade Lots 1 - 7 and an area to the south of David O Dodd Road with the development on Lot 8. Staff is supportive of the advanced grading request provided all slopes are 3:1 or flatter and the development complies with the Land Alteration Regulations of Section 29-190(14). This section requires a perimeter buffer strip temporarily be maintained around disturbed areas for erosion control purposes and the area shall be kept undisturbed except for reasonable access for maintenance. The ordinance states the width of the strip shall be six percent of the lot width and depth with a minimum width of 25 feet and maximum width of 40 feet. In no event shall these temporary strips be less than the width of the permanent buffers required for the development. Based on the typical minimum ordinance requirements the buffer on the southern property line should be 25 feet wide and the buffer on the east and west property lines must be 35 feet wide. Due to the sparse trees staff recommends the buffer on the street be at least 35 feet wide and the access opening at most 25 feet wide, which is sufficient for two way traffic. A tracking pad must be installed to eliminate tracking onto the City streets. All disturbed areas not developed must be vegetated prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued for the proposed building located on Lot 8. Staff recommends where possible, trees should be saved on Lots 1-7. The applicant has provided a signage plan indicating signage will be placed along the street sides along Lawson Road and David O Dodd Road with the maximum height and area as typically allowed per the ordinance. The signage typically allowed in commercial zones is a maximum height of 36-feet and a maximum sign area of 160 square feet. Building signage is proposed on the front along David O Dodd Road and the rear facing Lawson Road with a maximum sign area of ten percent of the façade area. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 9 The dumpsters have been identified on the site plan. The site plan includes the placement of three dumpsters locations behind the proposed building. A note on the site plan indicates the dumpsters will be screened per the typical ordinance requirements. The hours of service for the dumpster facilities has not been limited. Staff recommends the hours of service will be limited to daylight hours only. The site plan includes the placement of 286 parking spaces and a total building area of 60,000 square feet. The ground level or 30,000 square feet is proposed for C-3, General Commercial District uses and to second level is proposed for O-3, General Office District uses. Based on typical parking required for a shopping center development 266 parking spaces would be required. The site plan indicates the hours of operation are 24 hours per day and seven days per week. The front of the building will consist of brick and EIFS between the storefront windows and doors, EIFS from the top of the store front material and for the soffit of the covered walkway that will run the length of the building. The covered walkway will have a sloped roof and use a mix of roof tiles and architectural metal roof panels. Above the roof of the covered walkway, there will be an EIFS parapet with reveals. The sides of the building will be EIFS with reveals and the back of the building will have metal panels. The request includes a revision to the preliminary plat to adjust lot lines and create a lot without public street frontage. Staff is supportive of the lots as proposed. Staff does not feel the lot indicated without public street frontage will significantly impact the development. The development is proposed with access easements which will provide access to the proposed lot. Staff is supportive of the development as proposed. Presently the site is zoned C-3, General Commercial District and O-3, General Office District and the applicant is proposing a mixed use development utilizing these zoning classifications. Staff feels the development as proposed should have minimal impact on the development and the area. To staff’s knowledge there are no remaining technical issues associated with the request outstanding. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the requested proposed preliminary plat and proposed PCD for Lot 8 subject to compliance with the comment and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends the hours of dumpster service be limited to daylight hours. Staff recommends approval of the proposed variance for the preliminary plat to allow the creation of a lot without public street frontage. Staff recommends approval of the variance request to allow advanced grading as proposed subject to compliance with the comments as noted in paragraph H. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 9.1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6973-D 10 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the requested proposed preliminary plat and proposed PCD for Lot 8 subject to compliance with the comment and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the agenda staff report. Staff presented a recommendation the hours of dumpster service be limited to daylight hours. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the proposed variance for the preliminary plat to allow the creation of a lot without public street frontage. Staff also presented a recommendation of approval of the variance request to allow advanced grading as proposed subject to compliance with the comments as noted in paragraph H. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 10 FILE NO.: Z-7351-C NAME: Jive in Java Short-form PCD Time Extension LOCATION: Located at 8101 Stagecoach Road DEVELOPER: Clark’s Corner Company LLC 2409 Crystal Lake Circle Alexander, AR 72002 SURVEYOR: Global Surveying Kelton Price, PE 217 West 2nd Street, Suite 100 Little Rock, AR 72201 AREA: 0.68 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: PCD ALLOWED USES: Restaurant and C-3, General Commercial District uses as alternative uses PROPOSED ZONING: Revised PCD – Time extension PROPOSED USE: Restaurant and C-3, General Commercial District uses as alternative uses VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: Ordinance No. 19,339 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2005, allowed a revision to Miracle Development Long-form PCD. The applicant proposed to revise the previously approved PCD to allow the construction of a restaurant building on Lot 2 of the Miracle Development Subdivision. The development was to occur in two phases with the placement of a 10-foot by 20-foot prefabricated building on the site and the construction of drives and parking areas to allow for a drive-thru coffee shop. Phase II of the development would be the construction of a larger (24-foot by 50-foot) site built building to be constructed in conjunction with additional parking and drives to allow for August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7351-C 2 drive-thru sales as well as a small sitting area. The applicant indicated upon completion of the site built building, the prefabricated building would be removed from the site. The anticipated time frame for removal of the temporary building was 18 to 24 months. The approved hours of operation were from 6:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday and 6:00 am to 6:00 pm Saturday. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is now requesting a one year time extension for the placement of the permanent building. The applicant to justify the extension request has provided the following statements: ™Due to land issues for the purchase of the property we were not able to finalize the sale until January of 2007. This was significantly behind our projected time line for acquiring the property. This has delayed our ability to obtain financing for the final structure. ™Sales projections for this location are at the lower end of guidelines used to determine the viability of a unit. Although the sales began at the lower end steady but slow growth shows that as the area develops in housing and businesses so will our business. ™We have improved the location of the property with fill and a clean pad with partial pavement. ™Landscaping has exceeded the phase one of the planned site. Maintenance of the building and property will be maintained to an attractive level. The applicant is seeking approval of an extension to June of 2008 to initiate or complete the permanent building. B. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is supportive of the request. Staff does not feel the additional year will significantly impact the development or the area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating they were supportive of the request and did not feel the additional year would significantly impact the development or the area. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 11 FILE NO.: Z-7920-A NAME: Meramec Specialty Company Short-form PCD LOCATION: Located at 17410 Kanis Road DEVELOPER: Meramec Specialty Company Randy Garrett 919 Hickory Drive Bryant, AR 72015 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 10 Otter Creek Court, Suite A Little Rock, AR 72210 AREA: 8.80 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: PCD ALLOWED USES: Strip retail with C-3, General Commercial District uses as allowable uses and Mini-warehouse PROPOSED ZONING: Revised PCD PROPOSED USE: Seasonal Sale of Fireworks VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. The applicant requested withdrawal of this item on July 10, 2007. Staff is supportive of the withdrawal request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated July 10, 2007, requesting the item be withdrawn from consideration without prejudice. Staff stated they were supportive of the withdrawal request. Staff is supportive of the withdrawal request. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7920-A 2 There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for withdrawal. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 12 FILE NO.: Z-8118-A NAME: Meramec Specialty Company Short-form PCD LOCATION: Located at 18220 Cantrell Road DEVELOPER: Meramec Specialty Company Randy Garrett 919 Hickory Drive Bryant, AR 72015 ENGINEER: Crafton Tull and Associates 10825 Financial Center Parkway, Suite 300 Little Rock, AR 72211-3554 AREA: 1.85 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: PCD ALLOWED USES: C-1 uses PROPOSED ZONING: Revised PCD PROPOSED USE: Seasonal sale of fireworks VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. The applicant requested withdrawal of this item on July 10, 2007. Staff is supportive of the withdrawal request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item stating the applicant had submitted a request dated July 10, 2007, requesting the item be withdrawn from consideration without prejudice. Staff stated they were supportive of the withdrawal request. Staff is supportive of the withdrawal request. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 12 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8118-A 2 There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for withdrawal. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 13 FILE NO.: Z-8241 NAME: Scroggins Short-form PD-C LOCATION: Located at 3010 Winsome Drive DEVELOPER: James Paul Scroggins, Jr. 3010 Winsome Drive Little Rock, AR 72210 SURVEYOR: Ben Kittler, Jr. 28 Dena Drive Little Rock, AR 72206 AREA: 1.47 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-family ALLOWED USES: Single-family residential PROPOSED ZONING: PD-C PROPOSED USE: Single-family and cabinet shop VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site from R-2, Single-family to PD-C to allow him to construct a new shop building on the site and to operate a cabinet shop on the property. The building is proposed as a 32-foot by 48-foot building with a maximum height of 28-feet. The building is proposed as a wood building with a similar construction style as a number of buildings located in the area. There are no additional employees of the business. The applicant is requesting the ability to employ a family member should his son decide to pursue the craft. The business generates eight to twelve cabinet jobs per year and there is little to no customer traffic to the site. A lumber company makes deliveries and there is typically one delivery per cabinet job. The days and hours of operation are from 7:00 am to 7:30 pm Monday through Friday and from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm on August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8241 2 Saturday. On occasion, the hours may be extended to meet a deadline and allow a job to be completed. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a single-family residence. The area is predominately single- family homes located on acreage. East of the site on Rocky Lane is a property zoned PCD previously approved for a rock shop and automobile sales. North of Rocky Lane is a PCD approved for an upholstery shop. Across Winsome Road is a series of privately owned lakes and ponds. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one informational phone call and one letter indicating their support of the development with conditions. All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site and all residents, who could be identified, located within 300-feet of the site were notified of the Public Hearing. There is not a registered neighborhood association located in the area. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plans specifies that Winsome Drive for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Property outside the current service boundary. No comment. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: A water main extension would be required in order to provide water service from the Central Arkansas Water system. Fire Department: Place and install fire hydrants per code. The site is located outside the City limits of Little Rock. Provide a letter from the area volunteer fire department indicating their knowledge of the project and their ability to serve the development. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8241 3 County Planning: No comment received. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Ellis Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Commercial Development to allow the owner to construct a new 48x32 foot shop building and operate a cabinet shop on site. This application is for only their use. This is a home occupation from a land use standpoint, so a Land Use Plan amendment is not necessary. Master Street Plan: Winsome Drive is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Bicycle Plan: A Class I bike route is shown on Colonel Glenn Road according to the Master Street Plan bicycle section. A Class I bikeway is built separate from or alongside a road. Additional paving and right of way may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan. Landscape: 1. The site plan must comply with the City’s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. 2. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on tree covered sites. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 3. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the southern perimeter of the site. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year-around requirement. 4. The zoning buffer ordinance requires nine foot wide land use buffer along the southern perimeter of the property. Seventy percent of this area must remain undisturbed. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8241 4 5. A small amount of building landscaping is required. 6. Additional landscaping may be required with any new associated parking areas. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating the request was to allow the applicant the ability to construct a shop building to be used as a cabinet shop. Staff questioned if the business would have any employees. Staff also questioned the number of jobs and of deliveries per year. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the use of the property would require dedication of right of way 30-feet from centerline along Winsome Drive. Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated screening and buffering would be required along the southern perimeter of the site. Staff stated the rear of the building could act as the required screening. Staff stated no equipment or materials could not be stored in the buffer area. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has provided staff with a revised cover letter indicating there are no additional employees proposed of the business. The applicant has requested the ability to employ a family member should his son decide to pursue the craft. The request also limits the use to the current applicant and his ownership of the home and his residence on the property. The revised cover letter indicates a maximum of twelve deliveries from the lumber company will be made to the site per year. The applicant has indicated a dedication of right of way per the Master Street Plan will be provided if the rezoning is approved. Staff is supportive of the request. The request is to allow the construction of a 32-foot by 48-foot wooden shop with a maximum height of 28-feet on the site to serve as a commercial cabinet shop. The owner has indicated the business generates eight to twelve cabinet jobs per year and there is little to no customer traffic to the site. Deliveries are made by a lumber company with a maximum of August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8241 5 one delivery per cabinet job. The days and hours of operation are from 7:00 am to 7:30 pm, Monday through Friday and from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm on Saturday. On occasion the hours may be extended to meet a deadline to allow a job to be completed. Staff is viewing the proposed use of the property as a home occupation for the present ownership of the property. Although a cabinet shop is not allowed as a listed home occupation staff is viewing the use as a home occupation thus not requiring a change to the City’s Future Land Use Plan. Based on the fact the applicant has no employees outside a family member and there is little to no customer traffic to the site staff feels the proposed use should have minimal impact on the area. Staff also feels the approval should be limited to the current ownership and the current owner residing in the home. To staff’s knowledge there are no outstanding technical issues associated with the request. According to the Pulaski County Circuit Clerk’s Office there is not a bill of assurance for the site. Staff does not feel a commercial cabinet shop as proposed by the applicant and limited to the applicant’s ownership will significantly impact the area. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request, with the level of activity as proposed, subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends the approval be limited to the present ownership and the present owner residing in the home, PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff also presented a recommendation the approval be limited to the present ownership and the present owner residing in the home. Staff stated the maximum building height allowed would be 17-feet 6-inches. Staff stated the right of way dedication would not be required for the project since the applicant’s property did not abut the street. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 14 FILE NO.: Z-8242 NAME: Stuber Short-form PD-R LOCATION: Located near 600 Gamble Road DEVELOPER: Mei Chin Chuang/David Stuber 601 Brookside, Unit #4 Little Rock, AR 72205 SURVEYOR: Brooks Surveying 20820 Arch Street Pike Hensley, AR 72065 AREA: 0.32 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-2, Single-family ALLOWED USES: Single-family Residential PROPOSED ZONING: PD-R PROPOSED USE: Single-family Residential - 2 homes on a lot VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site from R-2, Single-family to PD-R to allow two homes to be constructed on a single zoning lot. There is presently a single-family home located on Lots 4 and 5 Block 11, Gibralter Heights Subdivision. The existing home was constructed across the lot line approximately five feet along the eastern side. The new home will be constructed with a 25-foot front yard setback and side and rear yard setbacks as typically required per the zoning ordinance. The site plan indicates a 10-foot separation between the proposed new residence and the existing home. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8242 2 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: There is an existing residence located on the site proposed for rezoning. A number of new homes have been constructed in the area along Atkins, Arthur and Gamble Roads. These homes have been constructed utilizing an “old paper plat” and the area has developed without curb, gutter or sidewalk. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. All owners of property located within 200 feet of the proposed site, all residents, who could be identified, located within 300-feet of the site and the Gibralter Height/Point West/Timber Ridge Neighborhood Association were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Arthur Lane is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 2. Dedication of right-of-way is required to 10 feet from centerline of alley. 3. With site development, Arthur Lane must be widened across the property frontage to provide at least 20 feet of pavement. 4. For building permits to be pulled on the new structure the address must be changed to 13015 Arthur Lane. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required, with easements. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding size and location of water meters. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. Fire Department: Fire hydrants maybe required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8242 3 County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Ellis Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Residential Development to allow the development of a second home on this site containing an existing home on two lots with the existing home encroaching onto the second lot proposed for new construction. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Gamble Road is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Collector Street is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of the development. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the Rock Creek Neighborhood Action Plan. The Residential Development goal states: “Encourage large lot single family development in the area.” Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were few outstanding technical issues associated with the request. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated Arthur Lane was indicated on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. Staff stated a right of way dedication of 25-feet from centerline would be required. Staff also stated additional paving to 20-feet would be required along the property frontage. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8242 4 H. ANALYSIS: There were no technical issues associated with the request remaining from the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant is seeking a rezoning to PD-R to allow the construction of a second home on this site. The site contains two lots and a single home has been constructed over the lot line. The existing single story home was constructed approximately five feet over the lot line a number of years ago. The applicant has indicated the existing home will be removed at some point in the future but desires to construct a new home on the site in the short-term. To allow this to occur the applicant must rezone the property to PD-R to allow for the two homes to be located on the same zoning lot until the existing home is removed. Staff is supportive of the request. The applicant has indicated building setbacks per the typical minimum standard for the proposed new residence. The applicant has indicated a 10-foot separation between the proposed new home and the existing residence which is typical separation between homes per the R-2, Single-family zoning district based on the lot widths. To staff’s knowledge there are no remaining technical issues associated with the request. Staff does not feel the rezoning of the site from R-2, Single-family to PD-R to allow the construction of the new home on the site will significantly impact the development or the area. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position. August 16, 2007 ITEM NO.: 15 FILE NO.: Z-8243 NAME: Pittman Short-form PD-R and Alley abandonment LOCATION: Located on the Northwest corner of 24th and Ringo Streets DEVELOPER: James R. Pittman 120 North 39th Street Fort Smith, AR 72903 SURVEYOR: Brooks Surveying 20820 Arch Street Pike Hensley, AR 72065 AREA: 0.24 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: R-4, Two-family ALLOWED USES: Single-family and Two-family residential PROPOSED ZONING: PD-R PROPOSED USE: Allow a separate lot for each of the existing structures VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The property currently contains a single-family home and a duplex. The applicant is seeking a rezoning from R-4, Two-family to PD-R to allow the existing duplex and single-family home to be contained on separate lots. Presently the lot is 75-feet wide and 140-feet in deep. The single-family residence is proposed to be contained on Lot 1 with a lot width of 75.0 feet and a lot area of 7,708.7 square feet. Lot 2 is to proposed contain the duplex. The lot area proposed for Lot 2 is 2,791.3 square feet with a lot width of 51.5 feet and a lot depth of 54.2 feet. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 15 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8243 2 Lot 1 is proposed with an 11.7 foot rear yard setback. The northern perimeter has a 6.4 foot side yard setback and the southern perimeter has a 27.5 foot side yard setback. The front yard setback is 30.9 feet. Lot 2 is indicated with a one-foot side yard setback along the eastern property line and a 1.3 foot rear yard setback. The duplex is located along West 24th Street and presently encroaches into a platted alley right of way. The applicant is seeking an abandonment of the right of way for the alley maintaining the area as a utility and drainage easement. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a single-family home fronting Ringo Street and a duplex fronting West 24th Street. There is an alley located along the rear property line providing access to the parking for the single-family residence. The alley does not go through to West 24th Street and ends at the northern edge of this property. There is a significant elevation change between West 24th Street and the duplex structure. There is a slight elevation change from Ringo Street to the Single-family home. The area is primarily single-family homes with a mix of two family residences. The streets appear to have recently been resurfaced. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. All owners of located within 200-feet of the site, all residents located within 300-feet of the site, who could be identified, the MLK Heritage Enrichment Center and the Downtown Neighborhood Association were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Ringo and 24th Streets. 2. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 3. The alley should be abandoned with easements or the encroachment of the structure removed. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available to the property. Entergy: No comment received. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 15 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8243 3 Center-Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional water meter(s) are required. Fire Department: Fire hydrants maybe required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located on CATA Bus Route #2 – the South Main Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Central City Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Residential Development to allow the reconfiguration of the existing lots and allow each of the two existing units to be located on a lot separate from the other. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: 24th and Ringo are both shown as Local Streets on the Master Street Plan. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Bicycle Plan: A Class III bike route is shown east of this site along Chester. A Class III bikeway is a signed route on a street shared with traffic. No additional paving or right-of-way is required. Class III bicycle route signage may be required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant’s property lies in the area covered by the Downtown Neighborhood Action Plan. The Plan does not address this issue. Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 26, 2007) The applicant was not present. Staff stated they had met with the applicant and he had secured approval letters from the utility companies concerning the August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 15 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8243 4 abandonment of the alley. Staff stated the existing duplex structure encroached into the alley which was the primary concern of staff and with the abandonment this issue could be resolved. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: There were no remaining technical issues associated with the request remaining from the July 26, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The request is a rezoning from R-4, Two-family to PD-R to allow an existing duplex and single-family home to be contained on separate lots. Presently the lot is 75-feet wide and 140-feet in deep. The single-family residence is proposed contained on Lot 1 with a lot width of 75.0 feet and a lot area of 7,708.7 square feet. Lot 2 is proposed containing the duplex. The lot area proposed for Lot 2 is 2,791.3 square feet with a lot width of 51.5 feet and a lot depth of 54.2 feet. Lot 1 is proposed with an 11.7 foot rear yard setback. The northern perimeter has a 6.4 foot side yard setback and the southern perimeter has a 27.5 foot side yard setback. The front yard setback is 30.9 feet. Lot 2 is indicated with a one-foot side yard setback along the eastern property line and a 1.3-foot rear yard setback. The duplex is located along West 24th Street and presently encroaches into a platted alley right of way. The applicant is seeking an abandonment of the right of way for the alley maintaining the area as a utility and drainage easement. The applicant has provided staff with approval letters from the various utility companies indicating their approval of the abandonment request for the 20-foot alley. The utility companies have indicated a desire to maintain the area as a drainage and utility easement. The adjoining property owner has agreed to the abandonment. The abandonment of the alley eliminates staff’s concerns with the encroachment of the existing structure into the alleyway. To staff’s knowledge there are no remaining technical issues associated with the request outstanding. Staff does not feel the allowance of the creation of a two-lot plat to allow each of the structures to be located on a separate lot will have a significant impact on the area. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends approval of the request for the alley abandonment located adjacent to Lot 7 and the South ½ of Lot 8, Block 9 Wat Worthen’s Addition to the City of Little Rock. August 16, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 15 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8243 5 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 16, 2007) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff also presented a recommendation of approval of the request for the alley abandonment located adjacent to Lot 7 and the South ½ of Lot 8, Block 9 Wat Worthen’s Addition to the City of Little Rock. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and 1 open position.