boa_01 31 2011LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
JANUARY 31, 2011
2:00 P.M.
I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being four (4) in number.
II. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings
The Minutes of the December 20, 2010 meeting were
approved as mailed by unanimous vote.
III. Members Present: Robert Winchester, Chairman
Scott Smith, Vice Chairman
Rajesh Mehta
Brad Wingfield
Open Position
Members Absent: None
City Attorney Present: Debra Weldon
LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
JANUARY 31, 2011
2:00 P.M.
OLD BUSINESS:
A. Z-8622 8 E. Palisades Drive
II. NEW BUSINESS:
1. Z-8628 5300 Sherwood Road
2. Z-8629 102 S. Rodney Parham Road
3. Z-8630 1007 Main Street
CD
■ L
U)
E
a)
U
f -C
3� IJ
^ 006 RV WIH `+ • �• L.._.._
Q� 4
20P 2
� F O
i 0J U f
01
y
rell
l
1
O
•�
N
as svwoNi Nva
Oa sNabas
all
C'
0: N
W � 1
? W
L Q
� 1
a 1
�b G 1
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: A
File No.: Z-8622
Owner: Philip and Gina Tappan
Applicant: Philip Tappan
Address: 8 E. Palisades Drive
Description: Lot "D", Block 1, East Palisades Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254
to allow a building addition with a reduced side setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 8 East Palisades Drive is occupied by a two-story brick
and frame single family residence. The property slopes downward from front to
back. The residence is one-story as viewed from the front and two-story from the
rear. There is a two -car wide driveway from East Palisades Drive at the
southwest corner of the property. The driveway accesses a carport within the west
portion of the residence. The applicant is preparing to remodel the residential
structure. The lot contains a 40 foot front platted building line.
The applicant is proposing to make additions to the existing residence, as noted on
the attached site plan. The additions include a two-story garage addition on the
west end of the residence. The proposed garage addition will be located five (5) to
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.)
seven (7) feet back from the west side property line. All portions of the additions
will be located behind the front platted building line.
Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side
setback of eight (8) feet for this R-2 zoned lot. Therefore, the applicant is requesting
a variance to allow the reduced side setback for the proposed garage addition.
Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as
reasonable. Because of the downward slope of the property from front to back and
the increased front setback platted for this property (40 feet instead of the typical
requirement of 25 feet), the applicant has very little option in placement of a garage
addition to the residence. The proposal will not be out of character with other
structures in the area. The homes along both sides of East Palisades Drive are
fairly large structures with varying front and side setbacks. Staff believes the
proposed garage addition with reduced side setback will have no adverse impact
on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance, subject to the
building additions being constructed to match the existing residence.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (DECEMBER 20, 2010)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff noted that the
applicant had agreed to defer the application to the January 31, 2011 agenda, based on
the fact that circumstances regarding the application had changed. Staff supported
deferral of the application.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred to the January 31, 2011
agenda with a vote of 3 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position.
Staff Update:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on January 18, 2011 requesting to withdraw the
application. The applicant has revised the site plan for the property to provide the
required side building setback. Staff supports the withdrawal request.
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JANUARY 31, 2011)
Staff noted that the applicant submitted a letter on January 18, 2011 requesting to
withdraw the application, as the applicant had revised the site plan for the property to
provide the required side building setback. Staff supported the withdrawal request.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and withdrawn with a vote of 4 ayes, 0
noes, 0 absent and 1 open position
TAP
�U
~�K�~��-�Q �� ,1roonA/wvv000ROAD, SUITE ONE / LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS rzx1z/su1,cz4.n110
L,arad& 1-Mat;sr
11/01/200
Little Rock Department ofPlanning 8\Development
723West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72203
Dear Board of Adjustment,
Mywife and | have purchased the home et8East Palisades inLittle Rock and are planning
a substantial renovation and upgrade. This house will serve as our principal residence. The original
house was developed in 1955 and is dated to that era. The house currently offers only exposed parking
under ecarport.
The reason for a zoning variance on this renovation is primarily due to a conversion from carport
to enclosed garage. Most houses built in this era did not have an enclosed garage but now that is
certainly standard procedure. While the current carport is located on the west end of the house
ithas arestriction onthe turning space making for analmost inoperable situation once that space would
be enclosed. It currently has a 90 degree turn into the carport but with the variance approval we will
drive straight into the garage when coming off of E. Palisades. While the lot has adequate space for a
garage on the rear of the house the slope from the front to the rear makes the space unusable for
the addition there due tuthe severe grade transition.
While the variance does ask for closer placement of the garage to the west side property line,it also
other storage items are currently kept.
I hope you will strongly consider our request.
'V'
Phil pTlap n
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 1
File No.: Z-8628
Owner: Cliff and Kristen Lee
Applicant: Jim Yeary
Address: 5300 Sherwood Road
Description: Lots 133-135 and Lots 172-174, Prospect Terrace No. 2 Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-
254, the easement provisions of Section 36-11 and the area provisions of Section 36-156
to allow a garage addition with a reduced side setback and utility easement
encroachment, and a pool house with a reduced setback from street frontage.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Building Codes Comments:
The required fire separation distance (building to property line) prescribed by the
building code terminates at five (5) feet. Buildings are allowed to be closer than
five (5) feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite
one (1) hour fire resistance rating. When buildings are five (5) feet or more from
the property line, the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself, only the
projections such as eaves or overhangs.
Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three (3)
feet from the property line, and are prohibited when the exterior wall is less than
three (3) feet from the line. There is no restriction on openings when the exterior
wall is more than three (3) feet from the property line.
Contact the City of Little Rock Building Codes at 371-4832 for additional details.
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.)
C. Utility Comments:
Little Rock Wastewater — No objection to easement encroachment. No sewer
mains located on property.
Central Arkansas Water — No objection to easement encroachment. No existing or
planned facilities within existing easement.
AT&T/SWB — No objection to easement encroachment
Entergy — No objection to easement encroachment. No future need for this
easement.
CenterPoint Energy — No objection to easement encroachment.
D. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 5300 Sherwood Road is occupied by a two-story rock
single family residence located within the south half of the property. The property
is comprised of six (6) platted single family residential lots, with Sherwood Road
located along the south property boundary, Edgewood Road along the north
boundary and N. Harrison Street along the east property line. Driveways from
Sherwood Road and Edgewood Road serve as access to the property and run
along the west side of the residence. A garage structure is located near the
northwest corner of the residence, with a pool house structure at the northwest
corner of the garage. There is an existing swimming pool in the rear yard area,
within the north half of the property. The rear yard area is enclosed with an
existing rock wall. The lots contain a thirty (30) foot platted building line along the
north and south property lines, and a fifteen (15) foot platted building line along the
east street side property line. An eight (8) foot wide utility easement runs
east/west through the center of the overall property.
The applicant is proposing to remove the garage and pool house structures and
construct a new garage addition at the northwest corner of the residence. The
garage portion of the addition will have a two-story height, with a one-story
heated/cooled connection to the existing house. The garage addition will be
located approximately two (2) feet from the west side property line, over 130 feet
back from the front (south) property line and 90 feet back from the rear (north)
property line. The one-story connection between the garage addition and existing
house will encroach across the existing utility easement.
The applicant is also proposing to construct a one-story pool house within the rear
yard area, as noted on the attached site plan. The pool house will be located thirty
(30) feet back from the rear (north) property line and approximately thirty-four (34)
feet back from the west side property line. The pool house will not encroach
across the thirty (30) foot platted building line along the Edgewood Road frontage.
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.)
The applicant is requesting three (3) variances with the proposed additions to the
property. The first variance is from Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning
Ordinance. This section requires a minimum side yard setback of eight (8) feet for
this R-2 zoned lot. As noted above, the proposed garage addition will be located
approximately two (2) feet from the west side property line.
The second variance is from Section 36-11(f). This section requires that
encroachments into utility easements be reviewed and approved by the Board of
Adjustment. A small portion of the heated/cooled connection between the
proposed garage addition and house will cross the utility easement.
The final variance is from Section 36-156(a)(2)c. This section requires that on
double frontage lots accessory buildings be set back at least sixty (60) feet from
each street fronting property line. The proposed pool house structure will be
located thirty (30) feet back from the rear (north), street fronting property line.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Staff views the request as
reasonable. As noted previously, the property is comprised of six (6) platted single
family residential lots. The overall building construction as proposed will occupy a
small percentage of the total lot area. The proposed side setback as proposed for
the new garage addition should provide adequate separation between it and the
nearest structure to the west. The proposed garage addition will maintain the
same side setback as the existing accessory structure. As noted in paragraph C.,
all of the public utility companies support the proposed encroachment into the
utility easement. With respect to the pool house structure, it will maintain a
setback from the north property line similar to the single family houses to the west.
It will have the appearance of aligning with those homes. Staff believes the
proposed garage addition and pool house structure are appropriate for the site and
will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
E. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested variances associated with the garage
addition and pool house, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the Building Codes requirements as noted in paragraph
B. of the staff report.
2. The garage addition and pool house must be constructed to match the
existing house (similar/complimentary style and color).
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JANUARY 31, 2011)
Jim Yeary and Chuck Hamilton were present, representing the application. There was
one (1) person present in opposition. Staff presented the application with a
recommendation of approval.
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.)
Jim Yeary addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained that the
garage addition with heated/cooled connection to the house was needed for security
purposes.
Bill Coker addressed the Board in opposition. He expressed concern with the proposed side
yard setback. He noted that the garage addition would block the view from his house to the
northeast.
There was a brief discussion of where Mr. Coker's house is in relation to the home in
question. Vice -Chairman Smith explained that the proposed garage addition was adjacent to
the lot north of Mr. Coker's lot, and not adjacent to Mr. Coker's lot. Mr. Yeary explained the
construction of the proposed garage addition. These issues were discussed further.
There was a motion to approve the application, as recommended by staff. The motion
passed with a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays, 0 absent and 1 open position. The application was
approved.
Yeary Lindsey Architects
December 21, 2010
Dana Carney
Little Rock Board of Adjustments
Planning and Development
I
723 West Markham
,
Little Rock, AR
Re: Cliff & Kristen Lee Variance Request
5300 Sherwood Road
Little Rock, AR
Please find attached our submittal to the Little Rock Board of Adjustments requesting
three variances with regard to the property at 5300 Sherwood Road.
The new Owners wish to make several improvements to the current property which will
require the Board's approval. They include.-
3
nclude:
3 Car Garage
The existing 2 car detached garage was built in approximately 1927 and is
insufficient. The interior dimensions of this structure, the maneuvering space and
approach to it are not adequate to accommodate the Owner's vehicles. The
existing location of this structure limits the potential for an addition to meet the
need of a three car garage. Additionally, the structure is located upon a utility
easement.
The desire is to construct a new 3 car garage on axis with the current driveway.
The center bay will allow a vehicle to pass through from Sherwood Road to
Edgewood Road (2 garage doors). The eastern bay will have access from the
south while the western bay will be accessible from the north. Due to the existing
pool location, the design of the garage aligns with the west wall of the existing
accessory structure which is approximately 2' from the property line. Due to
security issues regarding the family, the Owner has requested an indoor
connection from the garage to the main house.
Because of these circumstances two variances will be required for the
construction of the garage. A side yard variance is required since the garage will
be considered inclusive to the main structure,.it will encroach upon the western
8'- 0" side yard setback. A utility easement variance is also required since the
indoor connection will cross the utility easement.
3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, AR 72902 501-372-5940 FX: 501-663-0043
Yeary Lindsey Architects
2. Pool House
The current pool house is located to the northwest of the existing garage. As
described above, this area is planned to become part of the new 3 car garage.
Therefore, a new pool house located on axis with the existing pool is planned.
This structure is shown to align with the existing stone wall which is located 30
feet from the Edgewood property line. Due to the fact that the property is
considered by the City to have two front yards this accessory structure will
require a setback variance.
If you have any questions or need further information Please feel free to contact me.
We appreciate your consideration of our request.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
',At�oh , A1A.
Jim Yeary, AIA
3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, AR 72202 501-372-5940 FX: 501-663-0043
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 2
File No.: Z-8629
Owner: Chow Time Corp. — Little Rock
Applicant: Thomas Pownall
Address: 102 S. Rodney Parham Road
Description: West side of S. Rodney Parham Road, South of W. Markham Street
Zoned: C-3
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the parking provisions of Section 36-
502 to allow construction of a new restaurant building with reduced parking.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Vacant Restaurant Building
Proposed Use of Property: New Restaurant Building
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Landscape and Buffer Issues:
Areas set aside for landscape and buffer appear to meet the City minimal
standards.
An automatic irrigation system will be required in conjunction with this application.
C. Staff Analysis:
The C-3 zoned property at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road is occupied by a one-
story commercial building located within the north half of the property. Paved
parking is located on the north, south and west sides of the building. The building
previously housed a restaurant use, but is currently vacant. Access drives from S.
Rodney Parham Road and Sunnymeade Drive serve the property.
The applicant proposes to remove the existing building from the site and construct
a new one-story restaurant building, as noted on the attached site plan. The
proposed building will have an area of 12,416 square feet and be located within the
same area of the property as the existing building. The applicant is proposing to
utilize the two (2) existing access drives, and provide newly designed parking
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.)
spaces on the north, south and west sides of the new building. A total of 114
parking spaces is proposed with the redevelopment. Currently there are 107
parking spaces on the site. The new parking design will provide increased
perimeter and street buffers, with increased perimeter and interior landscaping.
The applicant is requesting one (1) variance with the proposed property
redevelopment. Section 36-502(b)(3)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a
minimum of 124 paved parking spaces for the proposed restaurant building.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow 114 parking spaces for
the site.
Staff is supportive of the requested parking variance. Staff views the request as
reasonable. The applicant is providing 92 percent of the required parking spaces
which should be sufficient to serve the proposed restaurant use. As noted
previously, increased buffers and landscaping are being provided with the new
parking designs. Without the increased landscaping, the applicant could easily
provide ten (10) more parking spaces. Additionally, the site is located relatively
close to the Midtown Design Overlay District (approximately one (1) mile to the
east), which allows a development to have half of the parking spaces as typically
required by ordinance. Staff feels that the amount of proposed parking will be
sufficient to serve the new restaurant use. Staff believes the new restaurant
construction will be a quality redevelopment of the site and have no adverse
impact on the adjacent properties or general area.
D. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested parking variance, subject to
compliance with the Buffer and Landscape requirements as noted in paragraph B.
of the staff report.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JANUARY 31, 2011)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the
application with a recommendation of approval, with conditions.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved, as recommended by staff,
with a vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position.
3810 LOOKOUT RD
December 21, 2010
Mr. Monte Moore
Zoning Administrator
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Chow Time Restaurant
Parking Variance Request
Dear Mr. Moore:
THOMAS ENGINEERING COMPANY
NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72116 (501) 753-4463
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
Submitted herewith is an application for a non-residential zoning request for the
proposed Chow Time Restaurant located at 102 South Rodney Parham Road,
Little Rock, Arkansas. The proposed building will have 12,416 square feet and
will require 125 parking spaces by ordinance. The owner would like to request a
variance of the required 125 spaces to 114 spaces. As can be seen on the
preliminary site plan, we will utilize all of the available lot area while increasing
the landscape area from the previous restaurant use.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Thomas R. Pownall, P.E.
Project Engineer
TRP/a b
FAX (501) 753-6814
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 3
File No.: Z-8630
Owner: Parwinder Singh
Applicant: Terry Burruss
Address: 1007 Main Street
Description: Lots 1 and 2 and part of Lot 3, Block 11, Original City of Little Rock
Zoned: UU
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the development provisions of
Section 36-342.1 to allow construction of an addition to an existing commercial building.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Commercial Building (Liquor Store)
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial Building (Liquor Store) with addition
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
1. The radii for the driveway on Main Street is too large, and should be reduced
to 10 feet.
B. Landscape and Buffer Issues:
Areas set aside for landscape and buffer appear to meet the City minimal
standards.
Street trees will be required along both Main Street and along E. 10th Street per the
UU district requirements.
These street trees must be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system.
C. Staff Analysis:
The UU zoned property at 1007 Main Street is occupied by a one-story block/brick
commercial building. The property is located at the southeast corner of Main
Street and E. 10th Street. Driveways from Main Street and E. 10th Street serve as
access to the property. Paved parking is located on the north side of the building.
A paved alley is located along the rear (east) property line.
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.)
The applicant is proposing to remove a portion of the existing building (1,486
square feet) at its northeast corner, and construct a new addition (1,628 square
feet) at the west end of the building, all noted on an attached site plan. The front
door of the liquor store business which occupies the building will be on the
building's north side, facing E. 10th Street. A new sidewalk with landscaping will be
located along the north side of the building. A redesigned parking area will also be
provided on the north side of the building. The existing driveway from Main Street
will be shifted slightly to the north, with the existing driveway from E. 10th Street
being closed. The paved alley will be utilized as a second access point. Eleven
(11) parking spaces will be provided along the north property line. New
landscaped areas will be constructed along the Main and E. 10th Street frontages.
The street fronting facades (north and west) will have an EIFS finish with brick
wainscot. Several new glass windows will be provided, with other panels to
resemble windows. The east (alley) elevation will be concrete block construction.
The applicant is requesting three (3) variances from the UU (Urban Use) zoning
design standards for the proposed property redevelopment. The first variance is
from Section 36-342.1(c )(7) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. This section requires
that entrances to buildings in the UU district be at street level at the sidewalk. As
noted above, the front door to the business will be located on the north side of the
building, separated from the street by the parking area.
The second variance is from Section 36-342.1(c )(8). This section requires that
street fronting floors of non-residential structures have a minimum surface area of
sixty (60) percent transparent or window display. The west elevation will have
approximately eleven (11) percent window display, with 28 percent when the other
panels are added. The north elevation will have approximately eleven (11) percent
windows, and 20 percent when the panels are added. The building currently has
no windows.
The final variance is from Section 36-342.1(c )(10)b. This section requires that
surface parking lots be located behind or adjacent to a structure, and not between
the building and abutting street. As noted previously, the applicant plans to
refurbish the existing parking area on the north side of the building, between the
building and E. 10th Street.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances from the UU district development
standards. Staff views the request as reasonable. Staff feels that the applicant is
proposing a quality redevelopment plan for this property, with updated building
fagade and new landscaped areas. Many of the UU development standards are
more pertinent to properties in the downtown area where there is a large volume of
pedestrian traffic. This property is located on the outer edge of the UU district
where pedestrian traffic is not as prevalent. As noted previously, the front door to
the existing business is on the north side of the building, facing E. 10th Street, with
an existing parking lot on the building's north side. The applicant is proposing to
maintain those two (2) elements with the redevelopment. With respect to the
percentage of window display, the existing building has no windows. The applicant
is providing new windows on the portion of the building to be added. Staff believes
JANUARY 31, 2011
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.)
the proposed property redevelopment will be an asset to the area, with no negative
impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
D. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested variances from the UU district
development standards, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the Public Works requirement as noted in paragraph A. of
the staff report.
2. Compliance with the Landscape and Buffer requirements as noted in paragraph B.
of the staff report.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JANUARY 31, 2011)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the
application with a recommendation of approval, with conditions.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved, as recommended by staff,
with a vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position
eueuo
614 CEIv i ER ST.
LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201
IT LteurgLlss 501-376-3676 FAX 376-3766
A r c n t e c t design, planning and interiors
December 21, 2010
go
Mr. Monte Moore o
Zoning and Enforcement Administrator
Department of Planning & Development
City of Little Rock
723 W. Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: Warehouse Liquor
1007 Main Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72202
Dear Mr. Moore:
Attached please find six (6) copies of the Site Plan and Survey on the above referenced project.
We are proposing to add approximately 1,600 square feet to Warehouse Liquor along with
demolition of approximately 1,486 square feet to the existing store. The existing structure has a
total of 6,625 square feet with the "new total" with addition being 6,766 square feet. We are
requesting a new curb cut on Main Street (while closing an existing curb cut on Main Street and
10' Street). A variance will be required for the location of the Main Street entry drive, the
location of the entry door, and the amount of glass storefront.
We appreciate your consideration on this request. If there are any questions or additional
information is needed, please call. We can also be reached by email at
tbadesignplanning@sbcglobal.net.
Yours very truly,
------------
------------
D
0
w
O
o
H
C
U
m
a
W
Cr
oUo
W
L)
cn
w
w
-Z
Q
=
,i
W
H
WLZ
Z
Z
F-
0 O
N
Z
W
H
• cn
O
B
O
m
�
c�
mo
o
<
=
L�m
m
W
<o
o
w
UJ
Ll.l
w
m
<
=UCS
LL
Z_
_Z
------------
------------
0
w
o
H
C
m
m
a
W
Cr
oUo
L)
cn
w
w
-Z
Q
=
,i
H
WLZ
Z
Z
iff
C
H
z
w
m
w
z
0
w
Q
January 31, 2011
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:22
p.m.
Date: 2 Z ✓I�
Chairman