boa_01 30 2012LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
JANUARY 30,2012
2:00 P.M.
I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being five (5)in number.
II.Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings
The Minutes of the December 19,2011 meeting were
approved as mailed by unanimous vote.
III.Members Present:Robert Winchester,Chairman
Scott Smith,Vice Chairman
Rajesh Mehta
Brad Wingfield
Jeff Yates
Members Absent:None
City Attorney Present:Debra Weldon
LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
JANUARY 30,2012
2:00 P.M.
I.OLD BUSINESS:
A.Z-8060-A 6400 Geyer Springs Road
II.NEW BUSINESS:
1.Z-5885-D 7321 Cantrell Road
2.Z-8738 614 President Clinton Avenue
3.Z-8739 6 Armistead Road
4.Z-8740 22016 Colonel Glenn Road
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:A
File No.:Z-8060-A
Owner:Mark West
Applicant:Nikki Burgess-West
Address:6400 Geyer Springs Road
Description:West side of Geyer Springs Road at Frozen Road
Zoned:I-2
Variance Requested:A variance is requested from the paving provisions of Section 36-
508 to allow a temporary gravel vehicular use area.
Justification:The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property:Auto Repair and Sales
Proposed Use of Property:Auto Repair and Sales
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B.Landsca e and Buffer Issues:
Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance
requirements.
The zoning buffer ordinance requires an average seventeen-foot (17')wide street
buffer along Geyer Springs Road.The parking lot needs to be shifted west to
meet this minimal city ordinance requirement.
The landscape ordinance requires a nine-foot (9'-0")wide perimeter landscaping
strip along Geyer Springs Road.A variance from this minimal amount will
require City Beautiful Commission approval prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
Curb and gutter or another approved border will be required to protect
landscaped areas from vehicular traffic.
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO 'CON'T
The landscape ordinance requires a minimum of 8 %of the paved areas be
landscaped with interior islands of at least 7 '/~feet in width and 150 square feet
in area.Proposed plan does not currently reflect this minimum.
Upon rehabilitation or building addition in the future the parking lot and
associated landscaping may need to be upgraded to meet minimal City
Landscape and Zoning Ordinance requirements.
A franchise agreement with the City of Little Rock will be required in conjunction
with any/all amenities located within the public right-of-way.
An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit,it will be necessary to provide an
approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape
Architect.
The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees
as feasible on this site.Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6)inch caliper or larger.
C.~fftaff Anal ala:
The I-2 zoned property located at 6400 Geyer Springs Road is occupied by three
(3)one-story commercial buildings which house an auto repair and sales business.
The property is located along the west side of Geyer Springs Road,between W.
65'"Street and the railroad right-of-way to the north.A driveway from Geyer
Springs Road near the southeast corner of the property serves as access.There
is an area of paved parking on the north side of the building.The property is
fenced with chain-link fencing.
The applicant is proposing to gravel a portion of the property along the Geyer
Springs frontage,as noted on the attached site plan.The gravel area is proposed
for the display of vehicles for sale.The applicant is proposing use of the gravel
area for 18 months,after which it would be paved.The applicant is proposing new
wood and "cable wire"fencing as part of the project.The area where the
temporary gravel vehicular use area is proposed is currently grass-covered.
Section 36-508 of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that all vehicular use areas
be paved where subject to wheeled traffic.Therefore,the applicant is requesting a
variance from this ordinance requirement to allow a gravel vehicular use area for
18 months.
Staff is not supportive of the requested paving variance.There is a rather large
area of asphalt paving along the north side of the building.A large portion of the
existing paved area is occupied by vehicles which are not operational.
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:A CON'T.
Staff feels that some of these vehicles could be consolidated/eliminated to make
room for vehicular display until such time that the applicants are ready to pave the
additional area.Additionally,the proposed gravel area would be in a very
visible/prominent location of the property along the Geyer Springs Road frontage.
Staff does not believe it appropriate to install a new gravel vehicular use area
(even on a temporary basis)at this location along Geyer Springs Road.The
properties across Geyer Springs Road to the east are developed with paved
vehicular use areas,with a newly developed property to the southeast,at the
corner of Geyer Springs Road and W.65'"Street.
D.Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends denial of the requested paving variance.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:(December 19,2011)
Staff informed the Board that the application needed to be deferred to the January 30,
2012 agenda so that a property ownership issue could be resolved.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred to the January 30,2012
agenda with a vote of 4 ayes,0 nays and 1 absent.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:(January 30,2012)
Mark and Nikki West were present,representing the application.There were no
objectors present.Staff presented the application with a recommendation of denial,
Mark West addressed the Board in support of the application.He explained the desire
to use asphalt millings instead of paving at this time.He described his proposed use of
the temporary non-paved area.
Vice-Chairman Scott asked how many cars would be displayed on the existing paved
area.Mr.West noted that hecould display approximatelyseven(7).He explained that
the temporary non-paved area would be used to display vehicles for sale.
There was a brief discussion regarding the existing asphalt area and new fence.Vice-
Chairman Smith explained that there are other components of a parking area such as
curbing and landscaping.
Mr.West explained the need for the delay in paving.He noted that other resources
would be available to pay for a paved lot in 18 months.
Chairman Winchester asked how long the auto repair/sales business had been on the
property.Mr.West noted four (4)years.
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:A CON'T.
The issue of the temporary non-paved area was discussed further.Rajesh Mehta
asked how large the gravel area would be.Mr.West responded 1,800 square feet.Mr.
Mehta asked about the cost for paving.Mr.West responded that it would be
approximately $5,000 for asphalt millings and $30,000 for paving.Mr.West explained
that he wanted to delay the parking lot improvements until a time closer to his purchase
of the property.
Jeff Yates expressed concern with Mr.West leaving the property before the 18 months
is up and the paving never getting installed.Mr.West noted that there was no need for
him to move.He explained that he could afford this location and had the resources to
grow at this location.
There was additional discussion related to the property and type of application which
was proposed for the parking area,Staff noted that a chip-seal type of application was
temporary.There was further discussion related to chip-seal application.
Vice-Chairman Smith explained the possible problems with supporting a variance for a
non-paved parking area.Mr.Yates made additional comments related to the issue of
chip-seal parking areas.There was brief additional discussion related to this issue.
Staff asked if there were going to be any new driveways from Geyer Springs Road.Mr.
West stated that there would be no new drives,
There was brief additional discussion related to staff's past recommendations on
deferral of paving issues.The drainage issue was discussed.
In response to a question from the Board,Mr.West noted that landscaping would be
installed initially,except for the interior landscaping which would be installed when the
lot is paved.
There was a brief discussion related to fencing and lighting of the property.
There was a motion to approve the paving deferral,subject to he following conditions:
1.There will be no new driveways from Geyer Springs Road.
2.The area of parking be properly prepared and graded as per City
requirements.
3.The area of parking have a sub-base as per city requirements.
4.Asphalt millings be installed with some required landscaping along the
street property line.
5.Within 18 months,the area of parking must be constructed to City
requirements,including paving,curb and gutter,landscaping and
irrigation.
The motion passed with a vote of 5 ayes,0 nays and 0 absent.
Staff explained that a landscape architect will need to design and prepare plans for the
parking lot to assure that the plan conforms to City code requirements.
z7
WeSt AutOPluS,InC.g-g~gr
6400 Geyer Springs Road
Little Rock,Ar 72209
Office 501-565-7704
Cell.501-425-1399
To whom it may concerm
I,Mark West,owner of West Autoplus which is currently a body shop and automotive
dealership.We are expanding the dealership so that we can have inore inventory.We do
understand that this location is zoned for paved surfaces,and our intentions are to do so
in the future.I'm requesting a eighteen month waiver to do such improvements.Until
then I would like to apply gravel in the proposed area.Thank you for your consideration
in this matter.
Sincerely,
Mark West
Owner
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:1
File No.:Z-5885-D
Owner:Pharmasite,LLC
Applicant:Terry Burruss
Address:7321 Cantrell Road
Description:South side of Cantrell Road,east of Georgia Avenue
Zoned:C-4
Variance Requested:A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-302
to allow a building addition with reduced side setback.
Justification:The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property:Drug Store with Compounding Lab
Proposed Use of Property:Drug Store with Compounding Lab and Storage Area
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
Measures to control the increase in stormwater runoff from the increased
impervious surface should be implemented to not damage adjacent property.
B.Landsca e and Buffer Issues:
a.If the rehabilitation exceeds fifty percent (50'/o)of the replacement cost of
the building the landscaping must be upgraded accordingly.
b.Any new parking areas must be landscaped per Chapter 15,of The
Landscape Ordinance and comply with the City of Little Rock Buffer
Ordinance.
c.The City Beautiful Commission recommends and appreciates saving
any/all on site existing trees.
C.Buildin Codes Comments:
The required fire separation distance (building to property line)prescribed by the
building code terminates at five (5)feet.Buildings are allowed to be closer than
five (5)feet if they have properly constructed fire walls which provide the requisite
one (1)hour fire resistance rating.When buildings are five (5)feet or more from
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:1 CON'T.
the property line,the requirement no longer applies to the wall itself,only the
projections such as eaves or overhangs.
Openings such as doors and windows are limited when the exterior wall is three
(3)feet from the property line,and are prohibited when the exterior wall is less
than three (3)feet from the line.There is no restriction on openings when the
exterior wall is more than three (3)feet from the property line.
Contact the City of Little Rock Building codes at 371-4832 for additional details.
D.~fftaff Anal ata:
The C-4 zoned property at 7321 Cantrell Road is occupied by a one-story metal
and stucco commercial building.There are two (2)access drives from Cantrell
Road and one (1)drive from Kentucky Avenue,which runs along the rear (south)
property line.Paved parking is located along the north and east sides of the
building,with paved vehicular use area along the south and west building sides.
A wood fence is located along the south and portions of the east and west
property lines.The building is occupied by Cantrell Drug,a drug store with
compounding lab.
On May 23,2011 the Board of Adjustment approved a planned building addition at
the southwest corner of the existing building.The addition was approved with a
west side setback of 4 to 6 feet,and a rear setback ranging from 12 to 12.5 feet.
The building addition was to be constructed over an existing asphalt area,with a
height not to exceed 30 feet.
On August 29,2011 the Board of Adjustment approved revisions to the previously
approved site plan.The revisions included a smaller footprint for the addition at
the southwest corner of the existing building and a small addition near the
northwest corner of the structure.A covered walkway was to connect the two (2)
additions.The same side (west)setbacks and building height were proposed as
originally approved.
After final design work on the project,the applicant is proposing additional
revisions to the site plan from what was previously approved.The proposed
addition at the southwest corner of the existing building remains the same as
previously approved.It will be set back from the west side property line by four (4)
to six (6)feet.The proposed addition at the northwest corner of the existing
building has been enlarged,as noted on the attached site plan.This addition will
be located four (4)to 4.5 feet back from the west side property line and over 60
feet back from the front (north)property line.Both additions will be two-story
construction,with a maximum building height not to exceed 30 feet,as originally
approved.The two (2)areas of addition will be connected by a small hallway
area.
Section 36-302(e)(2)of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side
setback of 15 feet for this C-4 zoned lot.Therefore,the applicant is requesting a
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:1 CON'T.
variance from this ordinance requirement to allow the building additions with a
reduced side setback.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances.Staff views the request as
reasonable.The overall concept related to the building expansion remains the
same as originally approved.The adjacent properties to the east and west are
zoned C-3,which require no side yard setback.The proposed building addition
with reduced setback will not be out of character with other commercial buildings in
this immediate area.The existing commercial building (Backyard Burgers)on the
property immediately to the west has a driveway along the dividing side property
line.Therefore,ample separation will exist between the two (2)structures.Staff
will require approval from the City's Fire Marshall prior to a building permit being
issued.The applicant previously stated that fire wall(s)will be constructed as
required.Otherwise,staff believes the proposed building addition with reduced
side setback will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general
area.
E.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends the approval of the requested side setback variance,subject to
the following conditions:
1.Compliance with the City's Landscape and Buffer Ordinances.
2.Compliance with the Public Works comment as noted in paragraph A.of
the staff report.
3.A letter of approval from the City's Fire Marshall must be submitted to staff
prior to a building permit being issued.
4.Parking must be provided to accommodate the building expansion as per
ordinance requirements.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:(January 30,2012)
The applicant was present.There were no objectors present.Staff presented the
application with a recommendation of approval,with conditions.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved,as recommended by staff,
with a vote of 5 ayes,0 nays and 0 absent.
6 14 C ER ST.
LITTLE ROCK,AR 72201
501-376-3676 FAX 376-3766
lfuPuss
design,planning and inleriors
z=l.4J
December 20,2011 Z-Sos'S-b
Mr.Monte Moore
Zoning and Enforcement Administrator
Department of Planning 8 Development
City of Little Rock
723 W.Markham
Little Rock,AR 72201
RE:Cantrell Drug
7321 Cantrell Road
Little Rock,Arkansas
Dear Mr.Moore:
Attached please find six (6)copies of the Site Plan and Survey on the above referenced project.
We are proposing to add 9,223 square feet of storage to the West side of the existing facility.
The existing building is 16,490 square feet.Currently there is 1,289 s.f.of retail,3,607 s.f.of
office,6,111 s.f.of manufacturing (compounding lab,etc.),and 5,483 s.f.of storage.The
addition would be used as a storage area only.The building height would not exceed 30'in
reality the addition would not be visible from Cantrell Road due to the existing front facade).
The building uses (including the proposed addition)would require a minimum of 36 parking
spaces.There are currently 26 parking spaces shown on the site;however the re-striping plan
shown on the attached site plan would increase that to 37 spaces.
We appreciate your consideration on this request.If there are any questions or additional
information is needed,please call.We can also be reached by email at
tbadesignplanning@sbcglobal.net.
Terry G.Burruss,AIA
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:2
File No.:Z-8738
Owner:Dennis Long
Applicant:James O'rien
Address:614 President Clinton Avenue
Description:North side of President Clinton Avenue,east of Sherman Street
Zoned:UU
Variance Requested:Variances are requested from the sign provisions of Section 36-353
and the development provisions of Section 36-342.1/36-553 to allow a projecting sign with
increased projection from a building and reduced setback from property lines.
Justification:The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property:Restaurant
Proposed Use of Property:Restaurant
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B.~Staff Anal ala:
The UU zoned property 614 President Clinton Avenue is occupied by a two-story
brick commercial building which houses Juanita's restaurant.The two-story
structure is located approximately 20 feet back from the south property line.An
elevated walkway extends from the sidewalk along President Clinton Avenue to the
second (upper)level of the restaurant.The first level of the building is below street
level.There are two (2)narrow wing walls along the east and west side property
lines,extending from the building to the front (south)property line.
The applicant proposes to install a projecting sign on the south end of the east
wing wall,as noted on the attached photo/sketch.The sign will be approximately
20 square feet in area and overhang the sidewalk.The sign will be located 12 feet
above the sidewalk and extend from the building 5 feet —8 inches.As noted
previously,the east wing wall is located on the east side property line.
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:2 CON'T.
Section 36-353(e)(1)c.of the City's Zoning Ordinance (River Market Design
Overlay District)allows projecting signs to extend a maximum of three (3)feet from
the face of a building.Section 36-553(b)requires that projecting signs be set back
at least five (5)feet from any property line.Therefore,the applicant is requesting
variances from these ordinance requirements to allow the projecting sign with an
increased projection from the building and a decreased setback from the east side
property line,extending across the front (south)property line.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances to allow the projecting sign.Staff
views the request as reasonable.The front wall of the restaurant building is set
back at least 20 feet from the front property line,with the buildings on either side
being on the property line.Additionally,other buildings further west are located
along the street side property line.Therefore,the projecting sign as proposed will
not be out of character with other projecting signs in the River Market area.The
River Market Design Review Committee reviewed the proposed sign on January
10,2012.The Committee approved the sign with the following condition:
~The bottom of the sign must be at least 13 feet above the sidewalk.
C.Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested sign variances,subject to the
following conditions:
1.The bottom of the sign must be at least 13 feet above the sidewalk.
2.A sign permit must be obtained.
3.A franchise permit must be obtained from the Public Works department.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:(January 30,2012)
Staff informed the Board that the application needed to be deferred to the February 27,
2012 agenda based on the fact that the applicant failed to correctly notify the
surrounding property owners.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred to the February 27,2012
agenda with a vote of 5 ayes,0 nays and 0 absent.
T4~~z.
2-0 vade
n
alt 0
614 Presrdeni Clinics Avenue rude Rock,AR 72201 pk (5015 572 /228
To Whom It May Concern:
The Little Rock sign ordinance (e)Projecting Signs,(I)Location,(c)states "Projecting
signs shall extend a maximum of three (3)feet from the face of the building.We would
propose that the sign be allowed to protrude Irom the front of the building,5 feet 8 inches
instead of the normal 3 feet.The sign that we are using is designed to be able to be seen
from a distance,since we are at the end of the River Market.This is the same variance
previously approved for the Flying Fish and the Big Whiskey's signs.There is an
ordinance stating that signs must be at least 5 feet from the property line.We would
propose we be given a variance on the sign ordinance requiring the sign to be at least five
feet from the edge of the property line.The sign cannot be mounted on a pole,and there
is no building present in front of the restaurant on the street,therefore the only way that
the sign can be mounted is on the front of the brick wall that belongs to the Restaurant.
Sincerely,
I es O'rien
River4 Frank Porbeck,ChairmanMarketLarryJacimore,Vice-Chairman
Design Terry Burruss,Member
Review Presley Melton,Member
Jim Rice,Member
Committee
Planning and Development ~723 W.Markham e Little Rock,Arkansas 72201 ~501-371-4790 ~fax 501-399-3435
January 18,2012 2-S'VS
S'oardofAdjustment
723 West Markham
Little Rock,AR 72201
Re:614 President Clinton Avenue,Juanita's
Chairman and Members,
The River Market DRC met on 10,2012 and reviewed the signage at 614 President Clinton
Avenue for Juanita's.The DRC did approve the projecting sign with one condition.The motion
was made to approve the signage with an installation height of thirteen feet (13')clearance
above the sidewalk The applicant stated in the DRC meeting that the sign was to be a
temporary sign and offered that there be a time limit.The final vote was 3 yes,1 noes and 1
abstention.
Brian Minyard
River Market DRC Staff
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:3
File No.:Z-8739
Owner/Applicant:Hunter and Mary Carpenter
Address:6 Armistead Road
Description:Lot 19,Edgehill Addition
Zoned:R-2
Variance Requested:A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254
to allow a building addition with reduced rear setback.
Justification:The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property:Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property:Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B.~Staff Anal ala:
The R-2 zoned property located at 6 Armistead Road is occupied by a two-story
brick and frame single-family residence.The property is located on the south side
of Armistead Road,east of Beechwood Street.There is a circular driveway from
Armistead Road which serves as access to the property.The driveway extends
along the west side of the residence to a garage on the west end of the house.
The applicants are proposing to construct a one-story addition on the rear (south
side)of the residence,as noted on the attached site plan.The proposed addition
will be located 20 feet back from the rear (south)property line and 32.5 feet back
from the west side property line.The addition is proposed to allow a laundry room,
library and master bedroom suite.
Section 36-254(d)(3)of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear
setback of 25 feet.Therefore,the applicant is requesting a variance to allow a
reduced rear setback of 20 feet.
Staff is supportive of the requested variance.Staff views the request as
reasonable.The requested 20 foot rear setback represents a relatively minor
variance.The proposed addition is only 2.5 feet over the 10 percent reduction in
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:3 CON'T
rear setback that staff can approve administratively.The proposed addition will not
be out of character with other properties in the area.Other residential structures in
this general area appear to have similar reduced rear setbacks.Additionally,the
lot has a 40 foot front platted building line,with the house located over 50 feet back
from the front property line.The typical front setback for R-2 zoning is 25 feet.
This reduces the amount of buildable area in the rear yard.Staff believes the
proposed reduced rear setback will have no adverse impact on the adjacent
properties or the general area.
C.Staff Recommendation.
Staff recommends approval of the requested rear setback variance,subject to the
addition being constructed to match the existing residence.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:(January 30,2012)
The applicant was present.There were no objectors present.Staff presented the
application with a recommendation of approval,with conditions.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved,as recommended by staff,
with a vote of 5 ayes,0 nays and 0 absent.
To:The City of Little Rock ~-F731
We would like to build an addition to the back of our house at ¹6 Armistead Road,to
include a laundry room,library and master bedroom suite.
We are requesting a variance of 5 feet,for the 25 foot setback requirement in the
rear yard,to allow our master bedroom to be 18'9 wide,rather than 13'9 wide,
which would be more in keeping with the size and style of the current house.
We would go no closer than 20 feet of the rear property line.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Hunter and Megan Carpenter
Re.ceudnu.l(o,Zo i(
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO.:4
File No.:Z-8740
Owner/Applicant:Robert and Pam Gracie
Address:22016 Colonel Glenn Road
Description:North side of Colonel Glenn Road,west of Beauchamp Road
Zoned:R-2
Variance Requested:A variance is requested from the accessory building provisions of
Section 36-252 to allow a trailer to be used as an accessory building.
Justification:The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property:Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property:Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A.Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B.~StaffAnai sis:
The R-2 zoned property at 22016 Colonel Glenn Road is occupied by a one-story
frame single-family residence located within the south Y4 of the property.The
property is located outside the Little Rock City limits,but within the City'
extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction.A gravel driveway from Colonel Glenn Road is
located at the southeast corner of the property.The overall property is 10.34 acres
in size.There are several small accessory buildings/metal carport structures on
the north side of the residence.The rear '/4 of the property is wooded.
The applicant recently placed an 8 foot by 32 foot mobile construction office-type
trailer in the rear yard area to serve as an accessory/storage building.The trailer
is located within the rear yard area,north of the residence,as noted on the
attached site plan.The applicant notes that the structure will be underpinned.The
exterior of the structure contains metal siding.
Section 36-252(b)of the City's Zoning Ordinance does not allow use of trailers as
accessory buildings in residentially zoned districts.Therefore,the applicants are
requesting a variance to allow the construction office-type trailer to be used as an
accessory building to serve their residence.
JANUARY 30,2012
ITEM NO 'CON'T.
Staff is supportive of the requested variance.Staff views the request as
reasonable,given the fact that the property is a large lot (10.34 acres)in a rural
setting of the City's extraterritorial zoning.The proposed accessory building will
not be out of character with other accessory structures on properties in this general
area.This area contains numerous accessory buildings of various size and type
throughout.Additionally,the proposed accessory structure has very little visibility
from the street,and is located a considerable distance from all property lines.Staff
believes the proposed accessory building will have no adverse impact on the
adjacent properties or the general area.
C.Staff Recommendation.
Staff recommends approval of the requested variance to allow use of a trailer as
an accessory building,subject to the following conditions:
1.All transport elements must be removed from the structure.
2.The structure must be underpinned with permanent materials.
3.The accessory structure cannot be used as a residence.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:(January 30,2012)
The applicant was present.There were no objectors present.Staff presented the
application with a recommendation of approval,with conditions.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved,as recommended by staff,
with a vote of 5 ayes,0 nays and 0 absent.
zg
2-s'ego
I
'Dent u p 8 k 53 ga4 5i"E.CR iC.,M
+r u&IQ('PDi WG~Gu.Il&I g Q&'i Q
+D ~PIC pl M [~AC U&F~.
AQ!J KILt M&L~
BOARD OF ADJUSTIIENT VOTE RECORD
DATE:~~~.0 wa ~
Gh/5$/j DvgzW
MEMBER
MEHTA,RAJESH
SMITH,SCOTT IIC
WINCHESTER,BOB v
WINGFIELD,BRAD
YATES,JEFF
TIME IN AND TIME OUT
MEHTA,RAJESH
SMITH,SCOTT
WINCHESTER,BOB
WINGFIELD,BRAD
YATES,JEFF
Meeting Adjourned 2 K4 P.M.&AYE NAYE ~ABSENT ~ABSTAIN
January 30,2012
There being no further business before the Board,the meeting was adjourned at 2:50 p.m.
Ch r Secre ary