Loading...
pc_09 19 2013 LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING – REZONING – CONDITIONAL USE HEARING MINUTE RECORD SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 4:00 P.M. I. Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being ten (10) in number. II. Members Present: Tom Brock Alan Bubbus Keith Cox Janet Dillon J. T. Ferstl Rebecca Finney Keith Fountain Obray Nunnley, Jr. Amy Pierce Bill Rector Members Absent: One Open Position City Attorney: Cindy Dawson III. Approval of the Minutes of the August 8, 2013 Meeting of the Little Rock Planning Commission. The Minutes were approved as presented. LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING – REZONING – CONDITIONAL USE HEARING SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 4:00 P.M. I. OLD BUSINESS: Item Number: File Number: Title: A. Z-8866 Chenal Car Wash – Conditional Use Permit 17000 Chenal Parkway B. Z-5805-D Iglesia Samaritano Internacional Church – Conditional Use Permit 11820 Chicot Road II. NEW BUSINESS: Item Number: File Number: Title: 1. Z-5644-A Pinnacle Classical Academy – Conditional Use Permit #1 Covenant Drive 2. Z-6860-C 5300 West Markham Suite “E” Salon – Conditional Use Permit 5300 West Markham Street, Suite “E” 3. Z-6923-A Pulaski Heights Presbyterian Church Day Care – Conditional Use Permit 4401 Woodlawn Drive 4. Z-8880 Woodley-Nelson Multisectional Manufactured Home – Conditional Use Permit 8419 Hidden Valley Road September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: A FILE NO.: Z-8866 NAME: Chenal Car Wash – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 17000 Chenal Parkway OWNER/APPLICANT: Chenal Car Wash, LLC/White-Daters and Associates PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow for construction of a single-tunnel, automatic car wash on this undeveloped, C-3 zoned property. STAFF REPORT: On June 12, 2013, the applicant requested deferral of the item to allow additional time to work with Entergy to solve some outstanding issues. Staff recommends deferral of the item to the August 8, 2013 Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 27, 2013) Staff informed the Commission that on June 12, 2013, the applicant requested deferral of the item to allow additional time to work with Entergy to solve some outstanding issues. Staff recommended deferral of the item to the August 8, 2013 Commission meeting. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and deferred to the August 8, 2013 agenda with a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays and 3 absent. STAFF UPDATE: On July 26, 2013, the applicant requested deferral of the item to allow additional time to work with Entergy to solve some outstanding issues. Staff recommends deferral of the item to the September 19, 2013 Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 8, 2013) Staff recommended deferral of the item as noted above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and deferred to the September 19, 2013 agenda by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8866 2 STAFF UPDATE: On August 29, 2013, the applicant requested deferral of the item to allow additional time to work with Entergy to resolve some outstanding issues. He states they hope to reach an agreement by late September. Staff recommends deferral of the item to the October 31, 2013 Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2013) Staff presented the item and a recommendation of deferral as noted above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved for deferral to the Oct. 31, 2013 meeting by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: B FILE NO.: Z-5805-D NAME: Iglesia Samaritano Internacional Church – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 11820 Chicot Road OWNER/APPLICANT: Iglesia Samaritano Internacional/Twin City Properties PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow a church to occupy this existing building and R-2 zoned property. STAFF REPORT: There are unresolved issues concerning a possible subdivision of this property. The applicant did not respond to issues raised at the Subdivision Committee meeting. Staff recommends deferral of this item to the September 19, 2013 Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 8, 2013) Staff recommended deferral of the item as noted above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and deferred to the September 19, 2013 agenda by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. STAFF REPORT: Prior to the August 29, 2013 Subdivision Committee meeting, the applicant informed staff that the church would be acquiring the entire property and there would be no subdivision of the tract. The applicant will submit revised drawings and responses to staff issues. Staff recommends deferral of the item to the October 31, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant the opportunity to submit those revisions and responses. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2013) Staff presented the item and a recommendation of deferral as noted above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved for deferral to the Oct. 31, 2013 meeting by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 1 FILE NO.: Z-5644-A NAME: Pinnacle Classical Academy – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: #1 Covenant Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: Covenant Presbyterian Church PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow a small private school to be located in a portion of the existing church facility on this R-2 zoned property. 1. SITE LOCATION: The church property is located on the south side of Chenal Parkway, west of Pride Valley Drive. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The church has occupied this 10± acre site for approximately 10 years. The Woodcreek and Parkway Place Residential Neighborhoods are located to the south, east and west. Chenal Parkway is located to the north. A multifamily development and a retirement community are located across the parkway to the north. No changes are being made to the church property. The small private school will operate during the week within the existing church facility. Allowing the proposed use should not affect the church’s continued compatibility with the neighborhood. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the Parkway Place Neighborhood Association. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: Access to the site is via a single driveway off of Pride Valley Road. Existing parking wraps around the south and west sides of the church building. Even at the school’s proposed maximum capacity of 50 children, there is more than sufficient parking available during the week. No changes are proposed to the parking and driveways. All drop-off and pick-up of children is to occur within the parking lot and not on the public right-of-way. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5644-A 2 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: No comments. 5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: 1. No Comments. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Wastewater: Sewer available to this project. Entergy: No objection. Centerpoint Energy: No comment received. AT&T (SBC): No comment received. Water: No objection. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding the size and location of the water meter. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. Contact Central Arkansas Water if additional fire protection or metered water service is required. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5644-A 3 Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire Department: Approved as submitted, maintain access. County Planning: No Comments. CATA: The site is not located on a CAT A bus route. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (AUGUST 29, 2013) The applicants were present. Staff presented the item and noted there were no outstanding issues. In response to a question, the applicant stated current enrollment was in the range of 20 students and maximum enrollment requested was 50 students. The applicant stated they held a neighborhood meeting and presented the proposal (including the 50 student maximum) to those who attended. The Committee determined there were no outstanding issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: Covenant Presbyterian Church occupies the 10± acre, R-2 zoned tract located at #1 Covenant Drive. The CUP to allow for construction of the church was approved in January 1993. The church development currently consists of two buildings, connected by a breezeway, and parking. A single driveway provides access off of Pride Valley Road. A conditional use permit is requested to allow Pinnacle Classical Academy, a private parochial school, to operate within the existing church facility. The school will provide for grades K – 8th. The school will initially use approximately 4 classrooms for its 15 – 20 students. At the requested maximum the school will have an enrollment of 50 students and will occupy a correspondingly larger number of classrooms. No changes will be made to the site to allow the proposed school use. No signage will be placed on the property for the school. To staff’s knowledge, there are no outstanding issues. The proposed school will utilize existing church facilities and will operate during normal business hours following a typical school calendar. There is no bill of assurance for this acreage tract. Allowing the proposed small (maximum 50 students) school to operate during the week with the existing church should have negligible impact on the neighborhood. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 1 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-5644-A 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the comments in Section 6 of the agenda staff report. 2. All drop-off and pick-up of students is to take place in the church parking lot and not in the public right-of-way. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2013) The applicants were present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff recommendation” above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: Z-6860-C NAME: 5300 West Markham, Suite “E” Salon – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 5300 West Markham Street, Suite “E” OWNER/APPLICANT: Dr. Bert Miller/M. Lynn Redden PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow a salon (beauty salon and massage therapy) to operate in one suite of this O-3 zoned property. STAFF REPORT: On August 29, 2013, staff spoke with Ms. Redden who stated she had found another site and did not wish to pursue the application. Staff notified Dr. Miller of Ms. Redden’s decision and asked him to advise staff if he wished to pursue the issue as property owner/applicant. Staff received no response. Staff recommends withdrawal of the application, without prejudice. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2013) The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of withdrawal as noted above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved for withdrawal by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: Z-6923-A NAME: Pulaski Heights Presbyterian Church Day Care – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 4401 Woodlawn Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: Pulaski Heights Presbyterian Church PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow a day care in the existing church on this R-2 zoned property. 1. SITE LOCATION: The church property occupies the block bounded by Walnut, Ash, Woodlawn and Lee; in the Hillcrest Neighborhood. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The church has been a part of the neighborhood for decades. Surrounding uses are primarily single family homes on typical, urban lots. The Hillcrest commercial district is located one block to the north, along Kavanaugh. Allowing this small day care operation during the week will not affect the church’s continued compatibility with the neighborhood. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the Hillcrest Neighborhood Association. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: The church parking lot is located on the west half of the block with access off of Woodlawn Avenue and Ash Street. The day care is proposed to have an enrollment of 36 children maximum with 8 employees; requiring 11 parking spaces. There is more than sufficient parking available during the week to accommodate the use. All drop-off and pick-up of children is to take place in the church parking lot and not in the public right-of-way. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: No Comments. 5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: No Comments. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6923-A 2 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Wastewater: Sewer available to this project. Entergy: No objection. Centerpoint Energy: No comment received. AT&T (SBC): No comment received. Water: No objection. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding the size and location of the water meter. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. Contact Central Arkansas Water if additional fire protection or metered water service is required. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer’s expense. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW’s Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No Comments. CATA: CATA bus routes are located along Kavanaugh Boulevard and Lee Street; one block to the north and south respectively. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6923-A 3 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (AUGUST 29, 2013) The applicants were present. Staff presented the item and noted there were no real outstanding issues. The applicant was asked to provide information on any proposed signage. Utility and Fire Department comments were noted. The Committee determined there were no outstanding issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: Pulaski Heights Presbyterian Church occupies the R-2 zoned block bounded by Woodlawn, Lee and Ash and Walnut. The main church building is located on the east half of the block. The west half contains three smaller buildings and the church’s parking lot. The church is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow the operation of a day care center in the church in partnership with Village Montessori. On October 26, 2000, a CUP was approved to allow a day care in the church. It was not done and that previous approval expired. The proposed day care will be operated Monday – Friday, 7:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. The age of the children will be 18 months – 5 years. The maximum capacity will be 36 children, with a total of 8 employees. The day care will be located in classroom space within the church building. The playground area is “tucked” into the “U-shaped” main building area. The church parking lot will be used for day care parking as well as drop-off and pick-up. A small (30” X 36”) sign will be placed on the Woodlawn side of the church property near the entrance to where the daycare will be located. To staff’s knowledge, there are no other issues. Allowing this small day care operation within the existing church should have no effect on nearby properties. The use had previously been approved by the Commission. The 1921 bill of assurance does not address use issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the comments in Section 6 of the agenda staff report. 2. All drop-off and pick-up of children is to take place in the church parking lot and not in the public right-of-way. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6923-A 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2013) The applicants were present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff recommendation” above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved, including all staff comments and conditions. The vote was 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 open position. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 FILE NO.: Z-8880 NAME: Woodley-Nelson Multisectional Manufactured Home – Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 8419 Hidden Valley Road OWNER/APPLICANT: Donald Nelson/Pamela Woodley PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is requested to allow placement of a multisectional manufactured home on this R-2 zoned 1 acre tract. 1. SITE LOCATION: The site is located off of Hidden Valley Road, south of Pinnacle Valley Road. The site is outside of the city limits, within the City’s zoning jurisdiction. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The site is located in a rural area characterized primarily by a variety of single-family housing types on larger lots and acreage. Undeveloped property is adjacent to the east, south and north. Two single family residences are located immediately to the west. Within the general area there is no specific housing type. The homes include site built homes, single-wide and multisectional manufactured homes. The site built homes vary in size and architecture. The proposed multisectional manufactured home does not appear to be incompatible with the neighborhood. Notice of the public hearing was sent to all owners of properties located within 200 feet of the site and the River Valley Neighborhood Association. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: One parking space is required for this single family residence. Access to the site is via an existing gravel drive off of Hidden Valley. There is sufficient space on the tract for several vehicles. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8880 2 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: No Comments. 5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: No Comments. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Wastewater: Outside Service Boundary, no comment. Entergy: Entergy has an existing overhead distribution line in the area. The manufactured home should not be located under or within ten (10) feet of the existing line so that proper NESC clearances can be maintained. This can be discussed when applies for service, but before home is located. Centerpoint Energy: No comment received. AT&T (SBC): No comment received. Water: No objection. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A water main extension will be needed to provide water service to this property. Please submit plans for water facilities to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities. Approval of plans by Central Arkansas Water, the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8880 3 Additional fire hydrant(s) will be required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. Fire Department: Little Rock Fire Department; Outside Little Rock City Limits. Notice also sent to West Pulaski Volunteer Fire Department. County Planning: No comment received. CATA: The site is located outside of the CATA service area. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (AUGUST 29, 2013) The applicant Pamela Woodley and the property owner Donald Nelson were present. Staff presented the item and noted there were few outstanding issues. In lieu of providing an authorization affidavit, Mr. Nelson signed the application form. Staff noted the utility comments, particularly the requirement to extend a water main and to provide a fire hydrant. Staff noted a response had not yet been received from the area volunteer fire department. Staff presented the siting criteria of Section 36-254(d)(5). Staff also noted Entergy’s comments. The applicants were advised to coordinate with the utilities. The Committee determined there were no outstanding technical issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: A conditional use permit is requested to allow a 28’ X 60’ multisectional manufactured home on the 1+acre tract located at 8419 Hidden Valley Drive. The property is located outside of the city limits, within the City’s zoning jurisdiction. The applicants were unaware of the City’s jurisdiction and had the home placed on the site. Once they were made aware of the violation, they applied for the conditional use permit. To staff’s knowledge the home is not yet occupied. The home is a new model with vinyl siding and a pitched, shingled roof. The home contains 5 bedrooms and 3 baths. The home will be occupied by the property owner, his niece and her family who will care for him. The home will be underpinned (bricked) and porches/decks will be added. Based on the September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8880 4 dimensions provided by the applicant, placement of the home exceeds R-2 district setback requirements. The general area around the site is rural in nature, consisting primarily of single family homes on larger lots and acreage. Housing types in the area vary in design from site-built homes of varying size and style to single-wide and multisectional manufactured homes. There are also large areas of undeveloped properties in the vicinity. Pinnacle Mountain State Park is located about 1 mile to the west. Staff believes the proposed use is appropriate. Multisectional manufactured homes are an appropriate housing type to be considered especially when they are not incompatible with an established neighborhood architectural style. As was previously noted, there are a variety of housing types and styles in the general area; most all of which are on larger lots or tracts. There is no bill of assurance for this acreage tract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested CUP subject to compliance with the following: 1. Compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in Section 6 of the agenda staff report. 2. Compliance with the following siting criteria from Section 36-254(d)(5) of the Code: a. A pitched roof of three (3) in twelve (12) or fourteen (14) degrees or greater. b. Removal of all transport elements. c. Permanent foundation. d. Exterior wall finished so as to be compatible with the neighborhood. e. Orientation compatible with placement of adjacent structures. f. Underpinning with permanent materials. g. All homes shall be multisectional. h. Off-street parking per single-family dwelling standard. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8880 5 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 2013) The applicant, Pam Woodley, and the property owner, Donald Nelson, were present. There were several other persons present, both in support and in opposition. Copies of twelve (12) e-mails of opposition had been previously distributed to the commissioners. Staff also informed the commission that three (3) phone calls had been received from area residents in opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the “staff recommendation” above. The applicant addressed the commission and stated she would reserve her time to respond to issues raised by the opponents. Ruth Bell, of the League of Women Voters of Pulaski County, spoke in support. Mrs. Bell stated manufactured homes were recognized by the Federal Government as equivalent to any other single-family housing. She stated she had personally seen other manufactured homes that had fit in with and not hurt other neighborhoods. She stated the applicant had a large lot which provided the opportunity to make improvements to the site; including the addition of decks and porches and landscaping. Dan Roda, attorney representing Bella Casa LLC, spoke in opposition. He stated his clients were developing a potential subdivision west of Hidden Valley. He presented copies of a map showing the location of his client’s property and photographs of another home in the immediate vicinity. He stated he disagreed with staff’s assessment that the area was rural; that he thought it was residential in nature. Mr. Roda stated the proposed home had objectionable characteristics and was placed on the property without prior approval. He noted there were others present in opposition. At his request, eight (8) persons raised their hands indicating their opposition. Delores Nelson, of 9405 Hidden Valley Road, expressed her concerns about traffic on the private drive back to the site. She stated the drive was not maintained by the County. She stated she was not opposed as long as they (the applicants) don’t create problems. Leslie Rounds, of 8411 Hidden Valley Road, stated she was representing elderly family members in opposition. She stated it was a difficult situation because of family ties between the applicants and some of the opposition. She said there were some family disagreements. Ms. Rounds stated there had already been a situation where lots of people had been on the property creating noise and parking problems. She said she was concerned about individuals creating problems for the neighbors. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8880 6 Ms. Woodley responded that she was trying to provide a home for herself and her elderly mother and uncle. She said they had been paying taxes on the property for years and wanted to occupy it. She read from a letter in which she described her plans make improvements; including rock or brick underpinning and putting in a paved driveway. She said she does not plan on having large parties but they did have a few friends over for a back yard party after the home had been moved in. She stated she did not know about the rules and had already made three mortgage payments on the home. Chairman Rector commented that he had not heard objections to the manufactured home; that he heard objections to anything being there and about the activities of people on the site. Mr. Roda stated he did not know about the family issues. He said he was there on the land use issue. He said there were newer, larger homes in the area and he expressed concern about property values being impacted. He asked if other manufactured homes would have to be allowed if this home was approved? Chairman Rector stated there were other manufactured homes in the area. He said the proposed home can be appropriate and it doesn’t look like a trailer. He described other manufactured homes that had been approved and placed in the City. Commissioner Nunnley asked staff when the proposed and required improvements would have to be made. Staff responded that the Commission could set a time limit and typically those improvements were a condition of occupancy of the home. Commissioner Bubbus asked the applicant how long the home had been on the site and if it was occupied. He asked what the cost would be to move the home, it the application were denied. Ms. Woodley responded she did not know the cost to remove the home. She said it had been on the site for about three months and she had made three payments. She stated the home was not occupied and the utilities had not been installed since the City stopped her. Commissioner Nunnley asked how long it would take to make the proposed and required improvements. There was then a discussion of an appropriate time frame in which to expect the improvements to be completed. Commissioner Nunnley stated he was concerned about the home sitting there unoccupied for an extended length of time pending completion of the improvements. It was agreed by the commissioners that six (6) months was an appropriate time. Ms. Woodley agreed and stated she was amending her application to include the six (6) month time limit to complete the improvements, including a paved driveway. September 19, 2013 ITEM NO.: 4 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8880 7 In response to a question, Chairman Rector stated the improvement would have to be completed by six months or the home would have to be removed or the applicant would have to re-file to come back to the commission. A motion was made to approve the application, as amended, including all staff comments and conditions. The motion was approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position. CLr w w 0 M CO 0 z Q J CL W �w Z Ate nil as a� E 0 Q css c a) a) 2 n I z CO m P, TM r W i oil all �Q. t � ��N a� E 0 Q css c a) a) 2 n I z CO m P, TM r W i oil all �Q. September 19, 2013 There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 4;37 p.m. Date 4 4 f I � Chairman